Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Department of Justice
'
A 206-349-898
Enclosed is a copy of the Board's decision and order in the above-referenced case.
Sincerely,
DO>vtL
Donna Carr
Chief Clerk
ca.AA)
Enclosure
Panel Members:
O'Connor, Blair
Userteam: Docket
Date:
AUG 1 8 2016
APPEAL
ON BEHALF OF RESPONDENT: Herlinda R. Vasquez, Esquire
APPLICATION: Reopening
The respondent, a native and citizen of Mexico, was ordered removed in absentia on
May 6, 2014. On January 16, 2015, the respondent filed the instant motion to reopen
proceedings, which an Immigration Judge denied on May 18, 2015. The respondent filed a
timely appeal of that decision. The record will be remanded.
The respondent challenges the Immigration Judge's decision and argues that the Immigration
Judge did not consider his arguments presented in his motion to reopen proceedings. The
Immigration Judge's decision consisting of a check list and a sentence which indicates that the
motion was denied because the respondent did not include an application for relief is inadequate
as it fails to include specific findings of fact and substantive analysis addressing the reasons and
claims stated in the respondent's motion to reopen. See Matter ofA-P-, 22 l&N Dec. 468 (BIA
1999); Matter of M-P-, 20 l&N Dec. 786 (BIA 1994), see also Matter of Ruiz, 20 I&N Dec. 91
(BIA 1989). Accordingly, we will return the record to the Immigration Judge to specifically
address the respondent's contentions and for the entry of a new decision.
ORDER: The record is returned to the Immigration Judge for further proceedings consistent
with the above opinion.
Cite as: Felipe Diaz Santana, A206 349 898 (BIA Aug. 18, 2016)
IN REMOVAL PROCEEDINGS
i'
/.17
.Jo /
-9'
r-
:-te
)?
-?--J-,-1-.1---
69 )f!J17VtP/.
S-
rati
/2_ - -Si
Certificate of Service
"
Christine Stancill
Immigration Judge