Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
20084
SHIP
SPEED
IN
A REGULAR SEA
by
Francis Noblesse
liJ
<M
15
HI
111
lu
oc
a
^
z
I- LU
U.UJ
>
I-
o<z
cc
LU h-
o
Xo
HI
lu
NDWDTNSRDC
5602/29
(supersedes 3960/441
April
(2 80)
1983
DTNSRDC-83/007
DTNSRDC
COMMANDER
00
TECHNICAL DIRECTOR
01
OFFICER-IN-CHARGE
OFFICER-IN-CHARGE
ANNAPOLIS
CARDEROCK
04
05
SYSTEMS
DEVELOPMENT
DEPARTMENT
AVIATION AND
PERFORMANCE
DEPARTMENT
SHIP
SURFACE EFFECTS
DEPARTMENT
16
15
COMPUTATION,
STRUCTURES
DEPARTMENT
MATHEMATICS AND
LOGISTICS DEPARTMENT
18
17
PROPULSION AND
AUXILIARY SYSTEMS
SHIP ACOUSTICS
DEPARTMENT
DEPARTMENT
27
19
CENTRAL
INSTRUMENTATION
MATERIALS
ENGINEERING
SHIP
DEPARTMENT
DEPARTMENT
28
29
NDW-DTNSRDC
5602/21 (2-80)
UNCLASSIFIED
SECURITY CLASSIFICATION OF THIS PAGE (When Dale
Entered)
READ INSTRUCTIONS
BEFORE COMPLETING FORM
REPORT NUMSER
2.
GOVT ACCESSION
NO,
3.
5.
TYPE OF REPORT
DTNSRDC-83/007
4.
TITLE
(and Subline)
ft
PERIOD COVERED
Final
AUTHORCs;
6.
8.
Francis Noblesse
9.
12.
REPORT DATE
13.
NUMBER OF PAGES
34
IS.
SECURITY CLASS,
April 1983
14.
ft
AODRESSf/f
OHIcd)
UNCLASSIFIED
16.
DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT
~. DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT
Block
DISTRIBUTION UNLIMITED
-Qt^NOG"^"^
dltle^S^Jfom Report)
20, II
\i
18.
SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES
19.
KEY WORDS
'aJIS-w
DEPARTMENT OF
OCEAM GMSI^'RFBmfi
READING ROOM
(Continue on rever
Ship
Ship Motions
Waves
Integral Equation
ABSTRACT
!'
DD
1473
NOV 65
S/N 0102-LF-014-6601
EDITION OF
IS
OBSOLETE
UNCLASSIFIED
SECURITY CLASSIFICATION OF THIS PAGE (When Dmtm
Snimrmd)
ITNCT-ASSTFTKn
SECURITY CLASSIFICATION OF THIS PAGE (When Date
Entered)
(Block 10)
UNCLASSIFIED
SECURITY CLASSIFICATION OF THIS PAGEfHTion Dale
Entered)
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
FIGURE
iii
ABSTRACT
ADMINISTRATIVE INFORMATION
1.
INTRODUCTION
2.
3.
4.
5.
20
6.
22
12
REFERENCES
27
13
ABSTRACT
The study presents a new integral identity for the velocity
potential of three-dimensional flow about a ship moving with
constant speed in regular waves.
This integral identity is
valid outside, inside, and exactly on the surface of the ship,
and is equivalent to the set of three classical identities valid
strictly outside, inside, and on the ship's surface, respectively.
For the usual problem of ship motions in a regular sea, the
integral identity obtained in this study yields an integrodifferential equation for determining the velocity potential on
the ship's surface. A recurrence relation for solving the proposed new integro-dif f erential equation is presented.
ADMINISTRATIVE INFORMATION
The research reported here was performed under the Numerical Ship Hydrodynamics
Program at the David W. Taylor Naval Ship Research and Development Center (DTNSRDC)
This program is jointly supported by the Office of Naval Research under Program
Element 61153N, Task Area RR0140302, and by the Independent Research Program at
DTNSRDC under Program Element 61152N, Task Area ZR0230101, and using Work Unit
1542-018.
1.
INTRODUCTION
Motions of a ship advancing with constant average speed in regular waves are
predicted theoretically by using approximate theories based on the slenderness of
ship forms.
These theories are the strip theory,, most useful in the short-wavelength
have made that theory the most widely used method for predicting ship motions.
Indeed, the theory, with the improvements of the recently proposed unified slender-
ship theory, seems likely to continue to provide a very useful and practical tool
in the future, even if significant improvements in computer performance are made and
Notwithstanding its many merits, the strip theory evidently has limitation, and
in some cases there is a need for potentially more accurate calculations based on a
be useful for predicting the pressure distribution on a complex bow shape, such as
and indeed only a very limited number of numerical results have been obtained by
Chang,
4-7
Further-
while agree-
ment is good for some hydrodynamic coefficients, discrepancies are very large for
This lack of consistency suggests that the accuracy of three-
other coefficients.
dimensional calculations may be difficult to control, as is the case for the problem
of wave resistance.
Different integral
equations can thus be formulated, and these can be solved in several ways, in particular by using an iterative solution procedure or inverting a matrix of influence
coefficients.
obviously depend, to a large extent, upon the form and mathematical properties of
the integral equation and upon the solution procedure selected as the basis of the
calculation method.
The results
given in this study generalize those obtained previously for the particular problems
of wave radiation and diffraction at zero forward speed,
10
<^,
(i.e., a line integral around the intersection curve between the mean hull surface
and the mean sea plane), as in the problem of ship wave resistance,
and a water-
plane integral (i.e., an integral of the Green function over the portion of the mean
sea plane inside the mean hull surface), as in the problem of radiation and diffrac-
[(()(x)-(j)(t)
]9G(t,x)/9n and
[(})(x)-(f)(t)
in the classical
take
terms are nonsingular, i.e., remain finite, as the integration point x approaches
any field point
an ellipsoid (with arbitrary beam-to-length and draft-to-length ratios) in translatory motion, along any direction, in an unbounded fluid, the first approximation.
given by Equation (5.6), actually is exact, as is proved in Reference 11; this first
approximation was also shown to provide a good approximation to the exact potential
for arbitrary translatory motions in an unbounded fluid of a cylinder in the shape
of an ogive with arbitrary thickness ratio.
three-dimensional theory of flow about a ship moving with constant speed in regular
waves is briefly formulated in Section
2;
1.
by the Green function associated with the free-surface boundary condition (2.5) are
given in Section
3.
G,
respectively.
cor-
responding to a flux across the mean sea surface, are proper in the limiting case
(3.4a and b) generalize the corresponding equations obtained previously for the par-
13
12
Section
is identity (4.13).
The
valid
obtained first.
b,
are
and c)
the hull surface, and indeed is equivalent to the set of the three usual identities
(4.10a, b, and c)
equation for determining the velocity potential on the surface of a ship moving at
constant speed in regular waves.
Finally,
Section
is presented in Section 6.
2,
Surface tension, wavebreaking, spray formation at the ship bow, and non-
A moving system of
coordinates (X,Y,Z) in steady translation with the mean forward velocity U of the
Specifically, the mean (undisturbed) sea surface and the center-
ship is defined.
plane of the ship in its mean position are taken as the planes
respectively; the
Z =
and Y =
0,
(2.1)
Z =
are not completely (or uniquely) determined unless an appropriate "radiation condiA
for instance.
tion" is imposed, as is well known and is discussed by Stoker,
.15
and
convenient alternative approach, employed previously in Lighthill
"'^
defining a
in
consists
condition"
"radiation
a
such
to the use of
Noblesse,"""^'
$'(X,T) = Re<l'(X)exp[(a-ioj)T]
(2.2)
where Re represents the real part of the function on the right side.
The eventual
P'(X,Y,T) = Re P(X,Y)exp[(a-ia))T]
(2.2a)
(2.2b)
In this alternative approach, one is then faced with an initial-value problem, with
and B^'/BT =
for T =
Use of Equations
~.
condition
(2.3)
<I>(X)
1/co
as reference time,
the
t = a)T,
J = X/L,
4)
= $/(gL)^^^L,
p = P/pgL,
q =
Q/igL)^^^
(2.4)
[S
where
and
(2.5)
is the time-
f =
ca(L/g)^/^
(2.6a)
F = U/(gL)^/^
(2.6b)
e = a(L/g)-'-/^
(2.6c)
V^(|)
in d
(2.7)
tion (2.7) is the domain exterior to the ship hull and bounded upwards by the mean
sea surface a.
satisfied:
[8
p =
The potential
= q.
(j)(x)
vanishes as
(2.8)
|x|
|-*-
>
at least
(j)
= 0(1/1 |x|
|)
as
|x|
|-^
>
(2.9)
Finally, on the mean position of the ship hull surface h the potential must satisfy
the usual Neumann condition
9(j)/3n
where
9(})/3n
= V<})'n
is the derivative of
given on h
<t>
(2.10)
expression for
8(j)/8n
found in Newman,
for instance.
consists in formulating an integral equation for the potential based on the use of
a Green function satisfying all the equations of the problem except the "hull boun-
The
3.
The Green function, G(^,x), associated with the sea-surface boundary condition
(2.5)
V^ G = 6(?-x)6(n-y)6(?-z) in C <
[8
where
-(f-iF8^+ie)^]G =
on
(3.1a)
(3.1b)
operator (9^,3
->-
->
,9^^).
-^
--
nent" of the velocity potential ReG(C,x)exp (e/f-i)t] of the flow created at the
[
0,
limiting case is that the pulsating flow created at point x(x,y,z=0) stems from a
flux across the plane
In the limit
z =
0,
the Green
V^G =
[9
(3.2a)
in C <
(3.2b)
C =
12 13
'
tion at zero mean forward speed (F=0) and of steady flow about a ship advancing at
4-+
C+z, and
_ y^
<;-!->-
(^-z)
z.
-<->
- x,
it then may be seen that the Green function G(C,x) also satisfies
V^G = 6(x-?)6(y-n)5(2-C) in
z <
(3.3a)
for
[8
-(f+iF8 +ie)^]G =
V G =
on z =
<
(3.3b)
in z <
(3.4a)
for
[8
z =
(3.4b)
,9
A well known expression for the Green function, in terms of a double integral,
can be obtained by using a double Fourier transformation of Equations (3.1a and b)
E,
and
r\.
-^
2-1/2
"-'^
4uG(C,x) = -[(x-0^+(y-n)^+(z-C)^]
OO
_l
-^
+ [(x-?)^+(y-n) +(z+C)
-1/2
'
2
]
CO
exp[(z+s)(y^vy/^i{(x-Oy+(y-n)v}]
(y'+v2)l/2 _ (f-Fy+ie)2
A.
cos9 and v = X sin6, which express the Cartesian Fourier variable y and v in
0.
19
Eggers,
20
Havelock,
21
and Brard,
and Wehausen,
10
22
and
the double- integral Fourier representation in terms of the polar coordinates (X,e),
in the manner shown in Reference 12 for the particular problem of ship wave
resistance (f=0, F^O), have not been obtained to the author's knowledge.
However,
such single- integral representations are considerably more complex than the corresponding integral representations for the ship wave resistance problem and the series
f?^0)
numerically evaluating the velocity potential defined by a surface (or line) distribution of singularities (sources or dipoles) with known strength, it may actually be
11
6.
4.
In this section, basic integral identities for the velocity potential are
((j)V^G-GV^(f))dv =
G(?,x).
(})(x)
J
h
(G3(l)/9n-({)9G/9n)da
(cj)9G/9n-G9cj)/9n)da
h,
1;
9())/9n = V(})'n
and 9G/9n
z =
with the
surrounding
we have
(4.1)
h00
0,
and the
((j)9G/9z-G8())/9z)dxdy
plane
I"
z =
(p
())9G/9z
(p[d
(G9(J)/9x-(f)9G/9x)/9x.
12
]())
(4.1)
Figure
=
j
Definition Sketch
[2i(f+ie)9(G(f))/Sx+F9(G9(J)/9x-(})8G/9x)/3x]dxdy
1 -
[2i(f+ie)G({)+F(G9(})/9x-(})9G/9x)]dy
[2i(f+ie)G({)+F(G9())/9x-())9G/9x) ]dy
(4.2)
as is shown in Figure
1.
13
(t)V^Gdv -
(|)[8^-(f+iF3^+ie)^]Gdxdy
(t)dxdy
(G8())/8n-(})3G/8n)da
I
+ F
[2i(f+i)G(|)+F(G9())/9x-(})3G/3x)]dy + I^
(4.3)
We have G
+ F
((f)3G/3n-G8(j)/8n)da
0(l/r) and
(j)
= 0(l/r)
[2i(f+ie)G(t)+F(G3(j)/3x-(|)3G/3x) ]dy
as r E (^^
2_^^2^1/2 ^
^
'
d''
The term I
can
plane are replaced by the unbounded mean flow domain d and the unbounded mean sea
surfspp n outside the mean hull surface h and its intersection curve
z
= 0,
respectively.
cj)
<^^
('p-'t'^)
where
(j)
4)(x)
as was defined
->
previously, and
(J)^
^,
i.e.,
(f)^
->
(})(C),
we may obtain
(j)V^Gdv -
(})[3^-(f+iF3^+ie)^]Gdxdy =
I*
14
C(j)^
+ C'
(4.4)
C =
V^Gdv -
(())-())
j^)V^Gdv - r
as X
->
->
5,
[8^-(f+iF9^+ie)^] Gdxdy
((f)-(l)^)[9^-(f+iF9^+ie)^]Gdxdy
if ^ - ^^ =
({"(x)
(4.5)
c,
as is assumed here.
Use of Equation
0,
C(})^
GV^(l)dv -
G[9^-(f-iF9^+i)^] ({)dxdy
(G9(j)/9n-ct)9G/9n)da
j
+ F
(4.6)
[2i(f+ie)Gcl)+F(G9(j)/9x-(t)9G/9x)]dy
Let t(t ,t ,0) represent the unit vector tangent to the curve c oriented in the
X y
1.
On the mean waterline c, we have
Furthermore, we
have
9<})/9x
= V({)*i,
where
where (n .n .n
surface
x'
y'
h,
9())/9,
are the components of the unit outward normal vector n to the hull
is the derivative of
(J)
c,
and
9(l)/9d
This
t^d<^/d!i - n^t^9(})/9d,
is the derivative of
(})
to
->-
15
C(j)(|)
where
C is
^(t) =
(4.7)
ijj(f)
GV^({)dv -
- Lit-A)
ij;(t)
G[3^-(f-iF9^+i)^](f)dxdy
+ F^
G8(J)/3nda
and
L(C;cj))
L(t;(j))
Gn
8(})/8nd
(4.8)
(j)
defined as
(f)8G/anda -
2i(f+ie)F
G4)t
+ F^
[(l)3G/8x-G(t
I
(4.9)
Use of Equations (3.3a and b) and (3.4a and b) in expression (4.5) for C then shows
-*-
that we have C = 1 if the field point ^ is strictly outside the hull surface h, in d
_
or on a, whereas we have C =
-)
It can
also be seen from Equations (3.3) and (3.4) that we have C = 1/2 if the point
->
C-
We thus have
16
the plane z = 0, at
the value of
which
(or a)
is
is
ind +
*(?)
= i)(0 -
>
UK-A) for
<
d.
ind. +
1
(4.10a)
-h-c
exactly on h +
<t>(K)/2
where
a-h-c
(4,10b)
>
(4.10c)
z =
0,
respec-
The value of the constant C on the left side of Equation (4.7) is discontinuous
across the ship hull surface
h;
b,
and c)
inside, as is
Equation (4.7).
distribution integrals
j,
ct)3G/8nda and J
(fi8G/8xt
d in the potential
can
L(^;()))
outside,
inside, or
(j)^
on both
C.
V^Gdv -
[3^-(f+iF8^+ie)^]Gdxdy
a.
d.
V^Gdv =
3G/3zdxdy +
17
8G/3nda
(4.11)
yields
C^ =
(f+iF3^+ie)^Gdxdy +
9G/9nda
[2i(f+ie)3G/3x-F9^G/9x^]dxdy = -
("
[2i(f+ie)G-F9G/9x] t d
C^ = (f+ie)^
Gdxdy - 2i(f+ie)F
a.
Gt d
+ F^ r 9G/9xt di
dl +
I
9G/9nda
(4.12)
C.(})^
C.
given by Equation (4.11) on the left side and Equation (4.12) on the right side, we
may obtain
->-)
->-
[l-w(5)](})(C) = i>(D
'
- L^(C;4))
(4.13)
w(t) = (f+ie)^
18
G(t,$)dxdy
(4.14)
and
L'(C;(J))
L^d;*)
defined as
<t)
((})-(f)^)8G/8nda -
2i(f+ie)F
+ F^
in which we have
(})
(j)(x)
J*^
(
and
[((})-(()
(j)^
)8G/9x-G(t
8(j)/9-n t
3(})/9d)]t d
SI
was used.
(4.15)
(})(^)
C.
xzy
dZ
G((})-cf)^)t
In obtaining
using Equations (3.3a and b) and (3.4a and b) in Equations (4.5) and (4.11), which
yield
+ C^ =
V^Gdv -
[9^-(f+iF3^+ie)^]Gdxdy
z<0
z=0
E,,
b,
outside,
Identities (4.10a,
b,
waterplane integral w(^) defined by Equation (4.14) and the integrals around the
mean waterline
c in
L(5;(j))
and L
(^;(J))
ip(C)
b,
Two
obtained in the limiting cases when the Froude number F vanishes, corresponding to
a body
and when
19
5.
Identities (4.10a,
b,
If the function
(p
(f)
continuous in
ity potential of flow about a ship advancing at constant mean speed in a regular sea,
of
3<t)/8n
(()
(j)
satisfies
the Laplace Equation (2.7) in the mean flow domain d and the sea-surface boundary
= q, at the mean sea surface a.
(4.13) then yield integro-dif f erential equations for determining the potential
<j)
on
[l-w(t)](j)(|) = i>it)
- L'(|;(t))
(5.1)
->
w(t) = (f+ie)^
G(|,x)dxdy
(5.2)
a.
the potential
'Jj(C)
i>(t)
G3ct)/8nda
+ F^
Gn^^
(5.3)
3(j)/3nd2.
L'(C;<J5)
:-A)
((l)-(l)^)8G/9nda ((l)-(l).)8G/9nda
2i(f+ie)F
f"
dJl
G(<j)-(j)^)t
+ F^
20
(5.4)
The potential
iJj(C)
tial L
(^;(f)),
is known since
9(})/8n
The poten-
(t)(^)
= k(t)ijj(t), where
-^
Specifically, by
adding the term k(OL^(?;ip) to both sides of Equation (5.1) and multiplying the
resulting equation by
ii(^)
we may obtain
tt)(t){[l-w(|)]4;(|)+L^(t;iP)} =
If the potential
<)>(S)L
(C;'!')
(p
ilj^it)
(J)(t)L'(|;i|j)
- i>(X)l^' (t'A)
(5.5)
^KOl
(C;<)>)
(5.6)
More generally, the above expression for the potential can be regarded as the
-.
...,
_.
..J,
<p
(n)
associated
<,,(n+l)(|)
^(X)&\t)/ill-^(t)]&\t)
(?)
(})
+ h^it-A'-''^)}
= i)(K)
for n >
(5.7)
21
6.
Equation (3.5) for the Green function may be written in the form
00
4uG(?,x) =
-d/r-l/rO
(1/tt)
'tt)
00
where r,
00
oo
dv
dyE(y,v;OE(y,v;x)/D(y,v)
(6.1)
r =
[(x-02+(y-n)^+(z-C)2]^/2
r' =
The potential
i['(^)
(6.1a)
[(x-C)^+(y-n)^+(z+C)^]^''^
(6.1b)
E(y,v;x) = exp[z(y^+v^)"'-'^+i(xy+yv)]
(6.1c)
E(y,v;t) = exp[(;(y^+v^)-'-/^-i(Cy+nv)]
(6. Id)
D(y,v) = (y^+v^)-'-/^-(f-Fy+ie)^
(6.1e)
form
^(t) =
S
ip
and
R
ip
/(t) + /(t)
(6.2)
regular term defined by the double integral, respectively, in Equation (6.1) for
the Green function.
integral
22
4^
/(t)
= -(l/4u)
(l/r-l/r')3*/3nda
(6.2a)
ip
/(t)
f-\
= -(l/47r^)
dv
dME(y,v;OA(y,v)/D(y,v)
(6.2b)
E(y,v;x)8<j)/9nda + F
F^
A(y,v) =
E(y,V;x)n
9())/3nd
(6.2c)
The waterplane integral w(C) defined by Equation (5.2) takes the form
00
w(t) = - -^^i|^
oo
dv
J
The potential
L'(C;'jj)
dy
j
^D(^y;f^
exp[i(xy+yv)]dxdy
(6.3)
form
L'(t;.|j)
L'[
= L^(t;i^) +
23
Cd;^^)
(6.4)
= -(1/4TT)
Lg(|;il;)
(/+/)-(4+'^^ ]9 (l/r-l/rO/9nda
(6.4a)
^00
00
L^(t;'l^)
= -(1/4tt^)
dv
dyE(y,v;|)A'(y,v)/D(y.v)
(6.4b)
00
oo
^'(y,v) =
[(^^W)-('l^^+4^^]^E(y,v;x)/^nd
j
- 2i(f+ie)F
j
I
+ F^
J
I
(/-ijj^)E(y,v;x)t
{(/h
{(ijJ^-t|jJ)3E/3x-[t
(1)
d^^/dl-n
3 (ij;^+i|;^)/9d]E}t
t
z
(6.4c)
->-
(5)
(j)
dil
The potential
L^(tA
),
1,
defined by Equation (5.7), for the second and subsequent iterative approximations
<t>
(n>_l),
b,
L'(5;iJj).
(6.3), and
say, of
the form
1(C)
dv
=1
.j\,!
I
dyexp[ay^+v^)^^^-i(?y+iiv)]N(y,v)/D(y,v)
24
(6.5)
=
N(y,v)
i.v) .
exp[z(y^+v^)"'-''^+i(xU+yV)]A(x)da,dxdy,d
(6.5a)
h,a ,c
.
real root, and the integral (6.5) can be evaluated without difficulty in principle.
25
REFERENCES
1.
Chang, M.S., "Computations of Three-Dim ens ional Ship Motions with Forward
135 (1977).
3.
Depth," International Shipbuilding Progress, Vol. 29, No. 332, pp. 103-117 (1982).
4.
4,
pp. 105-110
(1980).
5.
Inglis, R.B. and W.G. Price, "The Influence of Speed Dependent Boundary
Inglis, R.B. and W.G. Price, "A Three-Dimens ional Ship Motion Theory
The
Hydrodynamic Coefficients with Forward Speed," Trans. RINA, Vol. 124, pp. 141-157
(1982).
7.
Calculation of Wave Loading and Responses with Forward Speed," Trans. RINA, Vol. 124,
pp.
183-192 (1982).
8.
and 2, Edited by K.J. Bai and J.H. McCarthy Jr., David W. Taylor Naval Ship Research
Noblesse,
F.
Noblesse,
F.
Noblesse,
F.
pp.
13-33 (1983).
Potential Flow about a Body," Journal of Ship Research, Vol. 27, No.
(1983).
27
1,
pp.
1-12,
12.
Noblesse, F.
of the Theory of Ship Wave Resistance," Journal of Engineering Mathematics, Vol. 15,
pp. 241-265 (1981).
13.
Noblesse,
F.
(1957).
15.
Vol.
10,
pp.
Tech. Res, Bull. No. 1-12, pp. 3-43, Soc. Nav. Archit. Mar. Eng., New York (1953).
17.
Brard,R.
Hanaoka,
T.
Eggers, K.
Havelock, T.H.
pp.
874-878 (1957).
and Pitch," Trans. Inst. Naval Arch., Vol. 100, pp. 131-135 (1958).
22.
England (1980).
28
INITIAL DISTRIBUTION
Copies
Copies
CHONR/438 Lee
NRL
1
U.
Code 2027
Code 2627
of Cal/Dept Naval
Arch, Berkeley
Eng Library
1
1
1
1
U^.NA
1
1
1
1
Tech Lib
Nav Sys Eng Dept
Bhattacheryya
Calisal
Library
Higdon
na:)C
NCLL/Code 131
13
Library
Garrison
NAV 5 EA
1
SEA
SEA
1
SEA
1
SEA
1
SEA
1
1
SEA
,)EA
1
1
1
1
iEA
SEA
S.IA
SIA
SEA
PMS
031, R. Johnson
031, G. Kerr
031, C. Kennel
05R, L. Benen
05R, Dilts
05R, N. Kobitz
05R, J. Schuler
312, P. A. Gale
312, J.W, Kehoe
55W, E.N. Comstock
55W, R.G. Keane, Jr
61433, F. Prout
383, Chatter ton
Catholic U. of Amer/
Civil & Mech Eng
Florida Atlantic U.
1
Tech Lib
U.
of Hawaii/St. Denis
U.
of Illinois/J. Robertson
U.
of Iowa
1
1
U.
MIT
1
1
DTIC
DOT/Lib, TAD-491.1
NBS/Klebanoff
MARAD/Lib
Library
of Notre Dame
U.
1
29
Sclavounos
Abkowitz
Newman
Ogilvie
of Mich/NAME
U.
1
Library
Landweber
12
Aero Lib
T.Y. Wu
NCSC
L
CIT
N.lVPSGSCOL
1
U.
Webster
Paul ling
Wehausen
Eng Lib
Copies
2
Copies
SIT
1
1
1
1
Breslin
Savitsky
Dalzell
Kim
of Texas/Arl Lib
U.
U.
1
1
CENTER DISTRIBUTION
Code
Name
012
D.
R.M. Stevens
G.R. Lamb
1170
1170
1170
1500
W.B. Morgan
1504
V.J. Monacella
1520
w.c. Lin
1521
1521
W.G. Day
A.M. Reed
1522
1522
G.F. Do bay
M.B. Wilson
1540
1540
J.H. McCarthy
B. Y im
1542
1542
1542
F.
1560
1560
D.
1561
1561
G.C. Cox
S.L. Bales
1562
1562
1562
D.D. Mo ran
E.E. Zarnick
Y.S. Hong
Copies
of Washington
Eng Lib
Mech Eng/Adee
Webb Inst
1
Library
1
Lewis
1
Ward
SNAME/Tech Lib
25
Cox/Tech Info
Gibbs
Hydronautics/Lib
&
1
1
Lockheed, Sunnyvale
1
Potash
1
1
Oceanic
1
1
30
Jewell
Hawkins
Noblesse
T.T. Huang
J.
Bai
C ieslowski
Division Head
Copies
Code
Name
1563
W.E, Smith
1564
1564
J. P.
5211.1
Reports Distribution
522.1
Library
(C)
522.2
Library
(A)
10
Feldman
R.M. Curphey
31