Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
, England
INTRODUCTION
1
Fujiwhara (1924, 1925) performed similar experiments, but does not describe the details of the shear zone
structure. Path's model (Path, 1920) is also of the same
type, even though probably without boards, but the
structures illustrated are mainly tension gashes. See also
Brown (1928) for experiments on materials other than
clay.
1626
(plan)
Figure 1. Diagram of the Riedel experiment. (R)
Riedel shear. (R') conjugate Riedel shear. (IV) width of
shear zone.
Tchalenko, 1967b), and their similarity with
the shear box structures was shown to reflect
a similarity in the deformation mechanism
(Tchalenko, 1968).
On a much krger scale, the en echelon
arrangement of fractures in shear zones produced by strike-slip ground movements associated with earthquakes is fairly well documented in the literature on earthquake effects.
In this case, movements along faults situated
in the bedrock deform the sedimentary overburden or weathered rock and cause fracturing
at the ground surface. The shear features are of
the order of meters and hundreds of meters in
length. The movements are known with much
less precision than on the smaller scales, but
the similarity of the structures with the Riedel
and shear box cases suggests, at least for the
SHEAR BOX
RIEDEL EXPERIMENT
EARTHQUAKE FAULT
Figure 2. Deformation in the shear box, Riedel experiment and earthquake fault. (N) normal effective force. (T)
horizontal shear force. (F) tectonic fault in bedrock.
M. /.
AD
B
Figure 3. Riedel experiment results on kaolin. (A)
force-displacement curve. (B) proportion of total movement taken up by shears. Water content = 56 percent
(D) total (board) movement. (T) horizontal shear force.
(a,b,c,d,e,} stages in the deformation, also shown in
Figure 4.
value is reached at large displacements when
the shear zone is fully formed. By analogy
with the stress-displacement behavior which
will be demonstrated for the shear box, the
maximum shearing resistance is referred to as
the "peak shear strength," and the final stable
resistance as the "residual shear strength."
The appearance and evolution of the shear
zone structure may be followed visually or
photographically. By observing the development of individual shears and the distortion of
markers inscribed on the clay surface, the
approximate proportion of the board movement (or total displacement, D) taken up by
movement on individual shears (d) can be
measured. Figure 3B shows the rapid increase
of movement on shears after peak shear
strength, a characteristic feature of all clays.
Figure 4 shows the sequence of structures
1627
observed in the experiment, with kaolin mentioned in connection with Figure 3. The
structures, drawn on the basis of photographs
taken during the experiment, are shown at
five stages of deformation. Displacements
measured on the shears are plotted in the form
of histograms indicating the cumulative
amounts of displacement d,- having taken place
along shears of different inclinations ;'. The
histograms were constructed by adding the
offsets incurred by each marker, and by noting
the average inclination of the shears responsible
for each offset. Stages a to e in the outline
which follows, are common to Figures 3 and 4.
Pre-Peak Strength Deformation. (Not
shown in Fig. 4). The initial movement of the
boards causes a homogeneous straining in the
region of the future shear zone. Circles inscribed on the clay slab are transformed into
ellipses, indicating that the deformation is of
the simple shear type. No shears are discernible
during this stage.
Stage a, Peak Structure. The first shears,
the Riedels, appear just before peak shear
strength is reached, at an average inclination
of 12 + 1. At peak strength, the Riedels
have been bodily rotated to a maximum inclination of about 16. During this stage, the
proportion of total board displacement accommodated by individual shears increases rapidly
from 0 to around 50 percent.
Stage b, Post-Peak Structure. Some Riedels
are extended into a more horizontal direction,
and a few new shears appear at angles of about
8. The proportion of total displacement
accommodated by shears attains about 75
percent.
Stage c, Post-Peak Structure. New shears,
referred to as the "P shears," are formed at an
average inclination of -10, that is, approximately symmetrical to the Riedels. They
interconnect pairs of Riedels, at times forming
characteristic "bull nose" structures (Skempton, 1966). More than half of the shears are
now inclined at 4, and nearly all the total
movement at this stage is taken up by displacements along shears. This stage is illustrated
in Figure 7B.
Stage d, Pre-Residual Structure. The first
continuous horizontal shears, the "principal
displacement shears," are formed, isolating
elongated lenses of essentially passive material
between them. Most of the shears are inclined
at about 0 to 4.
Stage e, Residual Structure. Nearly all displacements take place along a single principal
1628
0 4 8 12 16 i
0 4 8 12 16' i
-10
0 4 6 1 2 18' i
-10
0 4 Q 12 15'
. 12{degrees)
IS'
rnclination^
Figure 4. Sequence of structures in the Riedel experiment. (D) total (board) movement. (*') inclination of shear in
degrees with respect to general direction of movement. (SA) cumulative amount of displacements on shears inclined at/at each stage of movement. (a,b,c,d,e,) stages in the deformation, also shown in Figure 3. For stager, see
Figure 7B.
displacement shear superimposed on the interface between the two boards. The shearing
resistance is stable, and at its residual value.
When kaolin or other clays are used at lower
water contents than in the experiment described above, a second family of shears is observed during stage a. These are the conjugate
Riedels, inclined at 78 + 1 for kaolin, and
appearing simultaneously with, or just before,
the Riedels. Due to the large angle they make
with the general direction of movement, the
conjugate Riedels soon become passive and distorted into an S shape (Fig. 5). The general
characteristics of stages a to e are however, not
modified by the presence of the conjugate
Riedels.
Shear Box Test
In the shear box apparatus, the sample is
confined between rigid sides and it can thus be
tested under larger ambient stresses (Fig. 2).
The test is performed by immobilizing the
upper half of the box and displacing the lower
1629
Figure 5. Detail of Riedel experiment structure. Note inhomogeneous strain around a Riedel shear (R), and
distortion of conjugate Riedel shears (R'). Thick vertical lines arc markers inscribed on the slab surface prior to
deformation.
and Tchalenko, 1967a). The increase in particle
parallelism occurring in the shears enables them
to be distinguished, in polarized light, from the
surrounding material. Structural observations
are carried out on two different scales: the entire
thin section is viewed directly or at a small
magnification, and a petrographic microscope
is used to examine details at magnifications of
up to X500.
The sequence of structures observed in the
shear box lest, both on the scale of the entire
sample and on the microscopic scale, is essentially the same as the one outlined for the Riedel
experiment (see Morgenstern and Tchalenko,
1967a, Figs. 5 and 8). Figure 8 A shows a
longitudinal thin section of a sample which has
nearly attained residual shear strength. Both
Ricdels and conjugate Ricdcls which appeared
at peak shear strength can be seen, as well as
some interconnecting P shears oriented approximately symmetrically to the Ricdels with
respect to the general direction oi movement.
The sample shown is at a stage corresponding to
stage d of the Riedel experiment when the
horizontal principal displacement shears appeared across the whole clay slab.
On a smaller scale, some of the individual
shears described above undergo a similar development which is illustrated in Figure 8B for
one of the Riedel shears. Each substructure is
1630
10
12 )mm
B
Figure 6. Shear box tests results on kaolin. (A)
stress-displacement curves. (B) Mohr envelopes. <rn'
normal effective stress, (r) shear stress. (D) total displacement. ($') peak angle of shearing resistance (0r)
residual angle of shearing resistance. (The stress-displacement curves are interrupted to show that the sense
of movement has been reversed ; see footnote 6) .
undergone different amounts of relative displacements, and under favorable conditions, a
time sequence and stages of a structural
evolution become evident. Such is the case for
the fractures associated with the Dasht-e Bayaz
earthquake of 1968, from which most of the
examples quoted in this paper are taken. Surface ground movements associated with this
earthquake were essentially strike-slip, and
over-all vertical displacements were negligible
(Ambraseys and Tchalenko, 1969). The ground
features, in the form of ridges and cracks, when
seen from the air, were found to be concentrated in shear zones which are the equivalent
of the shears described for the smaller scales
(Fig. 7A). These zones varied in length from
several meters to several hundreds of meters,
and in width from about a meter to some tens of
meters. They combined to form a "principal
displacement zone" in which Riedel directions
STRUCTURAL SIMILARITIES
The relative arrangement of the Riedel, conjugate Riedel and P shears, which constitute the
shear zone structure, is seen to be similar in the
three deformations described in the preceding
section. The extent of this similarity is best illustrated by comparing the Riedel experiment,
shear box test, and earthquake fault at three
distinctive stages of their structural evolution,
the peak structure (stage a), the post-peak
structure (stage c) and the residual structure
(stage e). The basic shear zone dimensions and
rektive displacements corresponding to the
examples quoted here are given in Table 1.
Stage a, which in the shear box and Riedel
experiment occurs just before or at peak shear
strength, is shown in Figure 9. The over-all displacements measured at the boundaries are 6
mm in the shear box2, 8.5 mm in the Riedel
experiment, and about 150 cm in the earthquake fault. The conjugate Riedels are the first
shears to appear; their larger angle to the general movement direction causes them to be
subsequently distorted and rotated by a few
degrees. During this stage the en echelon
Riedels are still at an early phase of their
development. The examples illustrated are
taken from cases where the conjugates were
particularly well developed.
At increased displacements, P shears interconnect the Riedels at inclinations approximately symmetrical to the Riedels (Figure 10).
This is stage c, which in the shear box and
Riedel experiment, occurs about half-way
between peak and residual shear strengths. A
continuous line can now be drawn through the
different shears along most of the length of
the shear zone. Over-all displacements in the
examples illustrated are 5 mm in the shear box,
20 mm in the Riedel experiment, and about
250 cm in the earthquake fault. "Bull nose"
structures and wedges are common features at
all scales.
2
The example chosen in Figure 9C is, in fact, of a later
stage of the stress-displacement curve (hence, the presence of some P shears), but the peak structure formed at
about 3 mm displacement is still perfectly retained in the
clay.
INTERPRETATION
1631
Material
Shear Zone
Relative
Displacement*
Width (W)
(D)
Shears
Width
Length
meters to
hundreds
meters
< 50 mm
<30mm
2-100 m
max 4.5 m
1-10 m
kaolin
kaolin
5-20 mm
20-500 M
~30 mm
~10 mm
< 1 mm
20-200 p
kaolin
20-200 M
< 10mm
<10M
Earthquake fault
Riedel experiment
Shear box test
(entire sample)
Shear box test
(substructure)
Relative
Displacement
()
< 4m
<30 mm
< 10 mm
~1 mm
1632
--
------- - -- --------- - ------- - -- ------------ ----------------- ----- ----------- - ------- - -------------- - ------- ------- ---------------- -------- cm (,,YY- also Fig. 10A). (B) Riedel experiment on kaolin: total displacement 19.5 mm (set1 also Fig. 4C).
where c' is the cohesion intercept, 4>' tl i c peak
angle of shearing resistance, and a,,' and r are,
respectively, the effective normal stress and
shear stress acting across the failure surlace. The
Coulomb criterion also predicts that the directions of the failure surfaces with respect to the
major principal stress <j\ are given by
/J = 45 - 0:2 .
(2)
Hvorslcv (1937), Pcynircioglu (1939) and
Gibson (1953) showed that the inclination of
failure surlaces in the tnaxial test are in closer
agreement with the Coulomb prediction il the
"true angle oi friction" 0e (Hvorslcv, 1936,
1937) is used instead of <fr' in equation (2). 'I he
chfierence 0' <$>e varies from a maximum of
about 10 tor highly active clays such as
bentomtes, to about 0 for kaolins and coarser
minerals. "I he deformation being of the simple
shear type, <TI is taken to be at 45 to the general
INTERPRETATION
1633
--
--
------- - -- --------- - ------ - -- ------------ ---------------- ---- -------- - ---- - ---- --- - --------- ------- - ---------- ------- ---------------- t
8 mm (see also Fig. 11C). The NW-SE hairline cracks are due to slight shrinkage associated with thin sectioning
procedure. (B) shear box test on kaolin, detail: estimated total displacement = 3 mm.
1634
TABLE 2. OBSERVED AND PREDICTED INCLINATIONS OF SHEARS AT PEAK STRENGTH IN THE RIEDEL EXPERIMENT
Type of Observed Predicted
Water Content % Shear Inclination Inclination
Type of Clay
4>e
Kaolin
(LL = 60, PL = 24)
London Clay
(LL = 79, PL = 34)
Wyoming B Bentonite
(LL = 579, PL = 45)
23
13
40 and 62
R
R'
R
2.5
12 1
78 1
7.5 1
2 1
11.5
79.5
6.5
1
100 m
10mm
10 mm
10 mm
Figure 9. Comparison of peak structure in shear zones of different magnitudes. (A) Dasht-e Bayaz earthquake
fault (after Tchalenko and Ambraseys, 1970, Fig. 8). (B) Riedel experiment (after Tchalenko, 1967, Fig. 132). (C)
entire shear box (after Morgenstern and Tchalenko, 1967a, Fig. 5). (D) detail of shear box sample (after Morgenstern and Tchalenko, 1967a, Fig. 12). Total displacements are given in the text. Dotted lines indicate less prominent
shears. The structures plotted in the form of rose diagrams show Riedel and conjugate Riedel directions.
700m
B
10 mm
10 mm
D
1 mm
Figure 10. Comparison of post-peak structure in shear zones of different magnitudes. (A) Dasht-e Bayaz earthquake fault (see also Fig. 7A). (B) Riedel experiment. (C) entire shear box sample. (D) detail of shear box sample
(after Tchalenko, 1968, Fig. 5). Total displacements are given in the text. Dotted lines indicate less prominent shears.
The structures plotted in the form of rose diagrams show Riedel and P shear directions.
CONCLUSIONS
contained within it similar Riedels on a smaller
scale. This resolution of a structure into substructures (also known for some cases of kinkbands in foliated rocks: Ramsay, 1962; Anderson, 1968; Dewey, 1969), is a process about
which very little is known. In the cases considered here, it seems to be arrested, and an
ultimate structure seems to be produced by the
emergence of an altogether different mechanism, basal plane slip in the first example and
tensional in the second, to the mechanism
operating on the larger scale. No interpretation
is offered here for these "Riedel within Riedel"
structures, the elucidation of which, both in
1637
Figure 11. Comparison of residual structure in shear zones of different magnitudes. (A) Dasht-e Bayaz earthquake fault (after Tchalenko and Ambraseys, 1970, Fig. 5). (B) Riedel experiment. (C) entire shear box sample (see
also Fig. 8A). (D) detail of shear box sample. Total displacements are given in the text. Dotted lines indicate less
prominent shears. The structures plotted in the form of rose diagrams show Riedel, P shear and principal displacement shear directions.
1638
is of the order of 105. The similarities in structure were interpreted as indicating similarities
in the deformation mechanism. At the peak
stage, the mechanism is essentially of the simple
shear type, at the post-peak stage it is governed
by the kinematic restraints inherent in the
strain field, and at the residual stage it is of the
direct shear type. The Coulomb criterion predicts adequately the peak stage structures.
The relationships between shearing resistance
and structural evolution, and between direction
of shears and mechanical properties of the
material, expkin the most perceptible similarities between the shear zones of different
magnitudes. There are, however, further
similarities which have not been explained, for
example, in the relative dimensions of structures
Figure 12. "Riedel within Riedel" structures. (A) and substructures, in the spacing of shears, and
Dasht-e Bayaz earthquake fault. (B) detail of shear box in the development of "Riedel within Riedel"
sample (after Morgenstern and Tchalenko, 1967a, Fig. structures. The study of these points will re9). Over-all trace and general direction of movement in quire new parameters to be taken into account,
the shear box are in the direction of the sense arrows. such as the degree of homogeneity and the volume of the material participating in the deforthe P shears lying approximately symmetrically mation, the variations in local ambient presto the Riedels with respect to the general direc- sures and pore-pressures, and so forth. The fact
tion of movement; and (3) the residual stage, that these and other parameters undoubtedly
during which the resistance to shear attains a vary greatly from one scale to another makes
stable though smaller value than that of the the similarity in structure all the more remarkpeak stage, and the characteristic structure able, and shows the necessity of continued reconsists of one or several parallel principal search into the mechanism of shear zones.
displacement shears in the general direction of
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
movement.
These three stages were shown to be common
The author acknowledges the support of the
to deformations taking place on the microscopic Natural Environment Research Council. He is
(shear box), intermediate (Riedel experiment), also grateful to Professor A. W. Skempton,
and regional (earthquake fault) scales. The F, R. S., and to Doctors N. N. Ambraseys and
range in linear scales of the shear zones described R. J. Chandler for helpful discussions.
REFERENCES CITED
Anderson, T. B., 1968, The geometry of a natural Cloos, H., 1928, Experimente zur inneren Tekorthorhombic system of kink-bands, p, 200tonik: Centralbl. f. Mineral, u. Pal., v. 1928 B,
220, in Baer, A. J., and Norris, D. K., Editors,
p. 609-621.
Conference on Research in Tectonics Proc., Dewey, J. F., 1969, The origin and development of
(Kink-bands and brittle deformation): Otkink-bands in a foliated body: Geol. Jour., v. 6,
tawa, Geol. Soc. Canada Paper 68-52.
p. 193-216.
Ambraseys, N. N., and Tchalenko, J. S., 1969, Path, E. A., 1920, The origin of faults, anticlines,
The Dasht-e Bayaz (Iran) earthquake of
and buried "granite ridges" of the northern
August 31st, 1968: A field report: Seismol.
part of the mid-continent oil and gas field:
Soc. America Bull., v. 59, p. 1751-1792.
U.S. Geol. Survey Prof. Paper 128 C, p.
Bishop, D. G., 1968, The geometric relationships
75-89.
of structural features associated with major Fujiwhara, S., 1924, Torsional form of the earth
strike-slip faults in New Zealand: New Zealand
surface and the great earthquake of Sagami
Jour. Geology and Geophysics, v. II, p. 405Bay: Jour. Meteorological Soc. Japan, Ser. 2,
417.
v. 2, p. 32-36.
Brown, R. W., 1928, Experiments relating to the
1925, Torsional form on the face of the earth:
results of horizontal shearings: Am. Assoc.
Japanese Jour. Astronomy and Geophysics
Petroleum Geologists Bull., v. 12, p. 715-720.
Trans., v. 3, p. 103-114.
REFERENCES CITED
Gibson, R. E., 1953, Experimental determination
of the true cohesion and true angle of internal
friction in clays: 3rd Internat. Conf. Soil
Mech. and Foundation Engineering Proc.,
Zurich, v. I, p. 126-130.
Hills, E. S., 1963, Elements of Structural Geology.
London, Methuen and Co. Ltd., 483 p.
Hvorslev, M. J., 1936, Conditions of failure for
remolded cohesive soils: 1st Internat. Conf.
Soil Mech. and Foundation Engineering
Proc., Cambridge, v. 3, p. 51-53.
1937, Uber die Festigkeitseigenschaften gestorter bindiger Boden: Ingeniorvidenkabelige
Skrifter, Ser. A., No. 35.
Morgenstern, N. R., and Tchalenko, J. S., 1967a,
Microscopic structures in koalin subjected to
direct shear: Geotechnique, v. 17, p. 309-328.
1967b, Microstructural observations on shear
zones from slips in natural clays: Geotechnical
Conf. Oslo Proc., v. I, p. 147-152.
Norris, D. K., and Barren, K., 1968, Structural
analysis of features on natural and artificial
faults, p. 136-167, in Bear, A. J., and Norris,
D. K., Editors, Conf. on Research in Tectonics
Proc. (Kink-bands and brittle deformation),
Ottawa, Geol. Soc. Canada Paper 68-52.
Peynircioglu, H., 1939, Uber die Scherfestigkeit
bindiger Boden: Berlin, Springer-Verlag,
Degebo no. 7.
Ramsay, J. G., 1962, The geometry of conjugate
fold systems: Geol. Mag., v. 99, p. 516-526.
Riedel, W., 1929, Zur Mechanik geologischer
Brucherscheinungen: Centralbl. f. Mineral.
Geol. u. Pal., v. 1929 B, p. 354-368.
MANUSCRIPT RECEIVED BY THE SOCIETY AUGUST
18, 1969
REVISED MANUSCRIPT RECEIVED JANUARY 12, 1970
1639