Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Outline
Introduction
Research Objectives
Numerical Work
Geometry
Numerical Results
Numerical and Analytical Results
Side Resistance and End Bearing Capacity
Conclusion
References
Introduction
Drilled Shaft
Introduction
in dense and
gravel is easier
Group of piles
= more economic
Ground vibration
= damage nearby structures
Introduction
Application
Drilled shafts are often used in many retrofit projects with certain ground conditions
Clay
limestone
loose sand
water saturated sand
Introduction
Axial Load
Qu = Q s + Qb
Qu = ultimate load
Qp = ultimate load-carrying capacity at the base
Qs = frictional (skin) resistance
Qs = (qs)(Surface area)
Qb = (qb)(Base area)
Qu = {(qs)( D L)} + {(qb)( D2)/4}
qs = Unit skin friction
qb = Unit base resistance
D = Diameter
L = Length
Research Objectives
Objectives
1) Developing a three-dimensional Finite Element Model
2) Evaluating the load-displacement curves on the shaft and soil
3) Considering two different stress-strain relationship for the
concrete, confined model and unconfined model and compare
the results of load-displacement
4) Comparing the numerical results from ANSYS and
Experimental model
Numerical Work
This part of the study presents a three-dimensional finite element modeling of a
drilled shaft subjected to axial load and then compares the results with an
analytical results.
Diameter = 7 ft
Length = 95 ft
Total load = 7000 kips
Concrete strength = 3 ksi
Longitudinal reinforce= 2.12% A
Cohesive Soil Profile
Numerical Work
Materials
Steel
CSL
Reinforcement
tubes
Material
Concrete
No.
3605
29000
29000
13.88
0.2
0.3
0.3
0.45
Elastic Modulus
(ksi)
Poisson's Ratio
Density
(pcf)
Soil
120
Cohesion
Angle
Dilatancy
of
angle
friction
0.06
35
30
Soil
Numerical Work
Numerical Work
Numerical Work
Numerical Work
Contact
Elements
Nodes Selected on
the Drilled Shaft
Geometry
Drilled Shaft
Numerical Results
Z Component of
Stress in Drilled Shaft
(Un-confined Model)
Numerical Results
Z Component of Stress in Soil
(Un-confined Model)
Numerical Results
Z Component of Displacement
in Drilled Shaft (Un-confined Model)
Numerical Results
Z Component of Displacement in Soil
(Un-confined Model)
Numerical Results
8.00E+03
7.00E+03
Load (Kips)
6.00E+03
5.00E+03
4.00E+03
Bottom Displacement
3.00E+03
Middle Displacement
Top Displacement
2.00E+03
1.00E+03
0.00E+00
0.00E+00
5.00E-01
1.00E+00
1.50E+00
2.00E+00
2.50E+00
Numerical Results
8.00E+03
7.00E+03
Load (kips)
6.00E+03
5.00E+03
4.00E+03
Top of Shaft
Middle of Shaft
3.00E+03
Bottom of Shaft
2.00E+03
1.00E+03
0.00E+00
0.00E+00
5.00E-02
1.00E-01
1.50E-01
Displacement (in)
2.00E-01
2.50E-01
Conclusion
With increasing the load, after 5000 kips displacement in the nodes on soil
is reduced.
Load- displacement curve in unconfined model has closer results to the
analytical results in comparison to confined model.
In confined model for concrete, since bars have been removed and confined
concrete model has been used for the stress-strain relationship, the loaddisplacement curve is less than analytical and un-confined results.
For drilled shafts with the diameters of 4 ft to 10 ft, in the first depths the
difference between the total axial load capacities of drilled shafts is less than
the end of the shafts.
For a drilled shaft with 7 ft diameter, and 95 ft length with cohesive soil profile ,
75.5 percent of the total axial load is resisted by the soil around the shaft
or side resistance and the rest of the axial load is resisted by the tip resistance.
References
Geotechnical Design Policy DS-1 , Intermodal Transportation Division, 206 South
Seventeenth Avenue Phoenix, Arizona 85007-3213, Arizona Department of
Transportation, December 2010, page14
Numerical analysis of composite piled raft with cushion subjected to vertical load,
Fa-Yun Liang, Long-Zhu Chen, Xu-Guang Shi
Three-dimensional finite element nonlinear dynamic analysis of pile groups for
lateral transient and seismic excitations, Bal Krishna Maheshwari, Kevin Z. Truman,
M. Hesham El Naggar, and Phillip L. Gould
Reese, L. C., ONeill, M. W. (1999). Drilled Shafts: Construction Procedures and Design
Methods, Publication No. FHWA-IF-99-025, Federal Highway Administration.
Rollins, K. M., Clayton, R. J., Mikesell, R. C., Blaise, B. C. (2005). Drilled Shaft Side
Friction in Gravelly Soil. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmetral Engineering,
Volume 131, Issue 8, 987-1003.
Bal Krishna Maheshwari, Kevin Z. Truman, M. Hesham El Naggar, and Phillip L. Gould,
Three dimensional finite element nonlinear dynamic analysis of pile groups for lateral
transient and seismic excitations, NRC Research Press, Can. Geotech. J. 41: 118133 (2004)
Bathe, K.J. 1982. Finite element procedures in engineering analysis. Prentice-Hall, Inc.
, Englewood Cliffs, N.J.
Thank You