Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
___________________________
Reversed.
BROCK, C.J., and NADEAU, J., concurred; DALIANIS, J.,
dissented.
DALIANIS, J. dissenting. The majority today holds that in
furtherance of the constitutional protections afforded free
speech under both the State and Federal Constitutions, we must
apply close scrutiny when interpreting RSA 641:4, I, so as not to
criminalize protected speech. Because I believe the majority has
effectively rewritten RSA 641:4, I, to include an element that is
otherwise not present in the statute, I respectfully dissent.
Page 7