Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Surveillance
Surveillance requires the systematic collection, analysis, interpretation and dissemination of
health data and is essential to the planning, implementation, and evaluation of public health
policies and practices. Surveillance systems can detect and verify emerging disease threats and
initiate the appropriate public health response in order to minimize the impact of a disease on the
health of a population. Most countries have systems in place to monitor certain diseases (e.g.
meningitis, anthrax and tuberculosis) through mandatory reporting by health care providers,
including physicians, laboratories, health centers and hospitals (notifiable diseases). Risk factors
for disease, such as smoking and alcohol consumption, are also monitored to review population
behaviors over time. The development of a surveillance system requires clear objectives and the
use of strict criteria with which to identify and classify disease.
The clear definition of a case of disease is vitally important to ensure accurate data are collected
and is usually based on three criteria: clinical findings, laboratory results to confirm a diagnosis,
and epidemiological data describing the time, place and type of individuals affected.
A standardized way of reporting disease is very important if authorities are to have confidence in
the data collected. Surveillance systems are sometimes described as either active or passive. In
passivesurveillance, the reporting of certain diseases isautomatic and routine, with an obligation
on health providers, laboratories and hospitals to notify a central public health agency of all cases
of a notifiable disease.
Active surveillance is rarely carried out routinely and makes use of periodic visits to institutions
to collect required data. Active surveillance may be used to monitor the spread of a new disease
threat but is costly and labor-intensive. While many effective surveillance systems are in place
around the world, we need to consider the fact that the proportion of notifiable disease that is
reported will vary and surveillance is unlikely to capture all disease. Estimates of disease
incidence in a population are therefore likely to be conservative.
Activity 1
Figure 1 shows the result of rheumatic fever surveillance in Denmark since 1900.
1
Health reviewed the data from routine surveillance systems in order to assess the burden of
malaria in the country and to introduce additional control measures. The data obtained in this
review are used here to highlight the benefits and limitations of data from routine surveillance
systems.
The numbers of clinical malaria cases and deaths from malaria reported each year between 1997
and 2002 by all government health facilities are shown in Figure 1.
Activity 3
John Snow (181358) was a distinguished physician. As an epidemiologist, he is best
known for his studies of cholera, in particular of two outbreaks that occurred in
London in 18489 and 1854.
During the nineteenth century, drinking water in London was supplied by private companies,
which obtained water directly from the Thames. Each company had its own network of pipes and
in some areas these networks overlapped to such an extent that the houses along a single street
might be supplied by more than one company. The Southwark and Vauxhall (S & V) Company
and the Lambeth Company were the two major companies that supplied water to cholera
epidemic areas during these periods.London was free of cholera from 1849 until 1853, and
during this period the LambethCompany moved its source of water upstream to an area outside
London, while the S & V Company continued to draw water from a downstream source within
London. When cholera reappeared in London in July 1853, Snow visited households where a
cholera death had been recorded and collected information on the routine sources of water. The
water sources for the households of the first 334 deaths are shown in Table 1.
Table 1. Water source of households of people who died of
cholera
in London 1853
Source of water Number of deaths
Number of deaths
S & V Company
286
Lambeth Company
14
Direct from river
26
Pump wells
4
Unknown
4
Total
334
1. Do the data presented in this table support Snows hypothesis that cholera is
transmitted through water? Give reasons for your answer.
Answer :
Dari data tersebut dapat disimpulkan bahwa kemungkinan besar bahwa kolera ditularkan
melului air (water borne). Sebab dari semua jumlah kematian hanya 4 kasus yang tidak
diketahui sumber penularannya, selebihnya adalah ditularkan melalui media air.
2. What further questions would you ask before reaching firm conclusions from these
data?
Answer:
a. Dibutuhkan data demografi penduduk yang didalamnya terdapat jumlah populasi,
sehingga bisa menentukan besarnya proporsi dan rate kematian tersebut.
b. Data tersebut hanya memberikan jumlah kematian dan tidak memberikan data kesakitan
atau yang tidak sakit sebagai pembanding dengan besarnya angka kematian (case
fatality rate).
c. Klasifikasi umur dan jenis kelamin
d. Tingkat pendapatan atau ekonomi
Snow collected data on the number of houses supplied by the S & V Company and the Lambeth
Company. When the cholera epidemic recurred in London in 1854, he again collected data on
sources of water in the houses of those who died of cholera. The number of cholera deaths per
10,000 houses during the first seven weeks of the epidemic (8 July to 26 August) in houses using
different water sources is shown in Table 2.
Do you think these data are adequate to conclude that cholera mortality is higher in houses
supplied by the S & V Company than in houses supplied by the Lambeth Company?
Discuss your answer.
Answer :
a. Dari tabel tersebut menunjukkan bahwa air yang disuplai oleh S & V Company secara
signifikan memiliki angka kematian yang lebih tinggi dibandingkan air dari sumber lain.
Table 2. Sources of water and cholera mortality in London, 9 July-26 August
1854
Deaths per
Total number of
Number of
Source of water
10000
households
cholera deaths
household
S & V Company
40046
1263
315
Lambeth Company
26107
98
38
Other
256423
1422
55
1. Using Figure 3 describe the distribution of cholera deaths in relation to the
position of water pumps.
Answer :
Paling banyak yang meninggal adalah penduduk yang mengambil air di pompa A
2. What explanations can you think of for the differences in the distribution of deaths
around water pumps A, B and C?
Answer :
Pompa A berada ditempat yang padat penduduk , sehingga besarnya sebaran kasus di
lingkungan sekitar pompa A dikarenakan penduduk menggunakan air dari pompa A tersebut.
Sedangkan pada B dan C berada di tempat yang bukan padat penduduk.
3. Can you conclude that water from pump A was the source of the cholera epidemic?
Answer :
Dapat disimpulkan bahwa pompa A merupakan sumber penularan utama. Indikasinya adalah:
- Jumlah kasus yang tinggi disekitar pompa A bila dibandingkan dengan pompa B dan C.
- Letak pompa A strategis berada ditengah penduduk, sehingga bisa diakses dengan mudah.
- Hanya satu kompleks atau rumah yang tidak menderita kolera yaitu Pabrik Beer karena
mereka memiliki pompa air sendiri dan lebih minum beer daripada minum air.
persuaded the local authorities to remove the pump. This was achieved on 8 September. The
dates of onset of symptoms of the 616 fatal cases of cholera recorded between 19 August and
30 September are shown in Figure 4