Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
- In underground
surface operations.
Drilling by rotary percussion is the most classic system
for drilling blastholes, and its chronological appearance
coincides with the industrial development of the ninteenth century. The first prototype machines made by
Singer (1838) and Couch (1848) were run by steam, but it
was when compressed air was used as the source of
energy, in the execution of the tunnel of Mont Cenis in
1861, that this system evolved and was put into extensive
use. This event, along with the arrival of dynamite, was
decisive in the rapid development of rock breakage in
mining and civil engineering at the end of the last century.
The drilling principle of these rigs is based upon the
impact of a steel piece (piston) that hits a utensil which
transmits at the same time that energy to the bottom of the
blasthole by means of the final element called the bit. The
rotary percussive rigs are classified in two large groups,
depending upon where the hammer is located:
- Top hammer. In these drills, two of the basic actions,
rotation and percussion. are produced outside the blasthole, and are transmitted by the shank adaptor and the
drill steel to the drill bit. The hammers can be driven
hydraulically or pneumatically.
- Down the hole hammer. The percussion is delivered
directly to the drill bit, whereas the rotation is performed
outside the hole. The piston is driven pneumatically,
while the rotation can be hydraulic or pneumatic.
Depending upon the fields of application of these
drilling rigs. surface or underground, the most common
range of diameters are shown in Table 2.1.
The main advantages of rotary percussive drilling are:
- It can be applied to any type of rock. from soft to
hard.
- Wide range of diameters;
- Versatile equipment. it adapts well to different operations and is very mobile;
- Only requires one operator:
- Easy. quick maintenance. and
- The capital cost is not high.
In view of these advantages and charactenstics. the
type of operations where it is used are:
- Underground
civil engineering; tunnels. underground hydraulic plants. residual deposits. etc.. and in
surface operations; roads. highways. industrial excava
tions. etc.
2.2 FUNDAMENTALS
DRn.,UNG
OF ROTARY PERCUSSIVE
Table 2.1.
(.pm X
Drilling diameter (mm)
Surface
Underground
Drilling method
50-127
75-200
Top hammer
Down the hole
38- 65
100-165
Ap)
3
t.!
I
Tn
/2
(Hartman,
1959).
)'/2
~ xA
m
p
(m x I
p
p
and taking into account the previous equations, the following can be stated:
P ..
= E eggx
11
where 11
=K
FLUSHING
FLUID
FEED
Fig. 2.4. The effect of thrust load upon penetration rate in top hammer
drilling.
EXIT OF
(CHIPS
2.2.4 Flushing
In order to have efficient drilling, the bottoms of the
blastholes must be maintained clean by evacuating drill
cuttings as soon as they appear. If this is not done, a large
quantity of energy will be consumed in regrinding with
the consequent wear on drill bits and decrease in penetration, apart from the risk of jamming.
Blasthole flushing is carried out with a flow of air,
water or foam that is injected by pressure to the bottom
through an opening in the center of the drill steel and
flushing holes in the drill bits.
The cuttings are removed up through the space between the rod and the blasthole walls, Fig. 2.5.
Flushing with air is used in surface operations, where
the dust produced can be eliminated by means of dust
collectors.
Water flushing is mostly used in underground drilling,
which also keeps dust down, although it reduces performance by about 10 to 20%.
Foam is used as a complement to air as it helps bring
large particles up to the surface and also acts as a sealer
for bias thole walls when drilling through loose material.
The velocity of air flow for efficient cleaning with air
goes from 15 to 30 m/s. The minimum velocities for each
case can be calculated from the following equation:
= 9,55
v
a
x~
x
Pr + I
(p6
P
Q
a
r x
_a
(01 - d1)
_
1.27
This drilling system can be qualified as the most conventional or classic, and although its use by pneumatic drive
was limited by the down the hole and rotary equipment,
the appearance of the hydraulic hammers in the sixties
has given a new boost to this method, complementing and
widening its field of application.
2.3.1 Pneumatic drilling rigs
Hammers driven by compressed air basically consist in:
- A cylinder with a front cover that has an axial
opening where the rotation chuck goes, as well as a
retaining device for the drill rods.
- The piston that alternately strikes the drill steel
shank through which the shock wave is transmitted to the
rod.
2.12.
Fig. 2.\1.
port.
the exhaust
12
Table 2.2.
Row (m3/min)
3.2
5.2
6.5
6.5
9.3
9.3
9.3
9.3
32
45
12
38
55
14
38
55
14
45
61
45
61
17
51
72
21
87
100
61
76
50
27
22
17
13
36
24
18
15
Blasthole diameter
51 mm (2")
64 mm (2112")
76mm (3")
89 mm (3112")
102 mm(4"}
115 mm (4112")
127 mm(5"}
140 mm (5112'')
152 mm(6'')
42
22
15
42
25
17
1.5- 1.7
35-95
1500-3400
40-400
2.1-2.8
52
32
21
15
17
37
24
17
12
68
34
19
16
69
34
21
15
working surface area of the piston on which the compressed air acts is increased.
- More power which allows working with larger diameters and lengths.
- The percussion and rotation can be adapted to the
type of rock to be drilled.
- Increased drilling yield.
This type of drills have cyiindrical gearing to transmit
the rotation movement to the drill steel, Fig. 2. 14.
The field of application of top hammer pneumatic rock
drills is turning more and more to short blastholes with
lengths between 3 and 15 m, blastholes of small diameter,
from 50 to 100 mm, hard rocks and areas of difficult
access. This is due to the large consumption of compressed air, about 2.4 m3/min for each centimeter of
diameter, and to the great wear on accessories. drill steel,
sleeves. bits, etc., to the frequency of blows and shape of
the shock wave transmitted with large diameter pistons.
However, pneumatic rock drills still give numerous
advantages:
- Simplicity,
- Reliability and low maintenance,
- Easy repair,
- Low capital cost, and
- Possibility of using the eXlsung compressed au
installations for underground operations.
2.3.2 Hydraulic rock drills
At the end of the sixties and beginning of the seventies, a
great technological advance took place in rock drilling
with the development of hydraulic hammers.
A hydraulic drill is composed basically of the same
elements as the pneumatic. Fig. 2.15.
The most important difference between both systems
is that instead of using compressed air as an energy
transmission medium, this has been replaced by a more
efficient medium. hydraulic oil, which is pumped around
the circuits by gear or piston pumps, driven by a diesel
engine or electric powerpack.
The following describes the working principle of a
hydraulic top hanlmer drill used in surface drilling. Figs.
2.16 to 2.19.
r~TON
... CHUCK BUSHING
DRIlL STEEL
SHANK ADAPTOR
ALVE
FLUSHING TUBE
PISTON
pair-Holman).
.
o f a pneumatic rock d n11wllh
. .Illdependent rotation (Com
DRILL STEEL
ADAPT
~I
II
ROTATION
MOTOR
7.5-25
6-20
2000-5000
0-500
100-1800
0.6-0.9
-n-!U!
. --J~i-I-O~i~-------------,-HYDRAUlIC TOP
HAlMooIER
PISTON
Table 2.5.
Diameter of the drill steel (mminches)
25.4-1"
31.7-1'//'
38.1-111.(
44.5-1\"
50.8-2"
a~~
8-12
10-14
14-16
16-18
18-22
,-.c:l'Du==============::=:=:::=.=:::.c:!
..
ORlLl STEEL
Fig. 2.20. Shape of shock wave and energy level in lop hammer
drilling.
...
m
2
-<
130
,to
CD
~
..J
110
>
W
-'
~
'DO
;0
i~~
.
1. HAMMER ROTATION
2. TUBE CLAMP
3. FEED MOTOR
4. COUPLING
~. FEED TUBES
6. HAMMER
7. DRILL BIT
MOTOR
Table 2.6.
Ill2mm DIAMETER
BUTTON BIT
GRANTE COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH 180 "".
Type of rock
Rotation velocities
Very soft
Soft
40-60
30-50
20-40
10-30
Medium
Hard
(r/min)
Fig. 2.24 Penetration rate and air pressures for di fferent down the hole
hammers.
_ Pm15
P M-
15 X /05
p
p
mO.5
p
where: Pm
Air pressure acting on the piston.
= Effective area of the piston, I = Piston stroke.
p
Pi ston mass.
p
Inp
It can be seen that air pressure is the parameter that has
most influence on the penetration rate obtained with a
down the hole hammer.
Nowadays there are valveless rigs that operate at high
pressures, 2 to 2.5 MPa, with excellent yields.
In order to avoid void percussion, the hammers usually
have a protection system that closes the air supply to the
cylinder when the bit is not in contact with the rock in the
bottom of the hole.
The drill bilS are connected to the hammer by two
systems: first, like a bayonet, the bit is inserted in the
a=.r
'"rn.~f~
11I.'1I'lolh,
tA
th~ I~f,
\lhit"h
)fV"L,l.':
if in
w:l1I
Table 2.7.
w
~
76
102-115
127-140
152-165
200
102
114
152
100
90
(/)
80
a:o
70
60
50
c(
l5
125
91
102
68.5
6.7
150
108
102
108
10.1
200
148
100
177
17.1
300
216
100
624
28.2
1.33
1.37
1.39
1.35
1.39
0.47
0.54
0.67
0.86
0.94
..J
..J
100
75
100
38.5
4.7
40
#.
STEEL
30
same.
- High pressure compressors
~nt"nJ\.
("nn,lll11nri"n
2.5.1 Airlegs
Basically. an airleg consists of two tubes. an outer tube of
aluminium or another light metal. and a inner tube of steel
that is connected to the jackhammer. The inner tube acts
as a piston with double effect. controlling its position and
thrust force with a valve that is connected to the compressed air circuit. Fig. 2.26.
2.5.2 Chainfeed
This system consists of a heavy gauge chain that runs
between two channels and is powered by a pneumatic or
hydraulic piston type motor. depending upon the fluid
used to dri ve the hammer. by means of a worm and a
wheel type gearbox.
The chain is attached to a travelling drill mount which
runs over the top of the channels.
The advantages of this system. which is widely used in
surface as well as in underground equipment. are: its low
cost. easy repair and the possibility of long feed lengths.
On the contrary. there are some problems. such as: more
wear in abrasive conditions. danger if the chain breaks
2.5.3 Screwfeed
In this system, the feed thrust is produced by the rotation
of a lead screw run by a piston or gear type air motor. The
screw has a small diameter in relation with its length and
is subject to bending forces and vibrations during drilling.
For this reason, lengths over 1.8 m are not common.
The principal advantages of this method are: a regular
and smooth feed force, great resistance to wear, very
powerful and adequate for deep blastholes, less bulky
than chainfeeds and safer.
However. this system also has inconveniencies which
are: high price, difficult to repair and limited in length.
2.5.4 Cablefeeds
In Canada this system is very popular and is mounted on
special jumbos called Stopewagons. Basically, it consists
of a hollow light extrusion upon which the drilling
machine slides. A piston moves inside and is connected at
each end to a cable that comes out of each end of the
extrusion through closures or glands. The piston is run
pneumatically.
Its advantages are: low price. easy repair, robust and
long operational life.
*i
A. Jumbos
Jumbos are drilling units equipped with one or various
drill hammers and their principle application in underground labors are:
- Driving of tunnels and drifts.
- Bolt hole drilling and cross cutting.
- Benching with horizontal blastholes.
- Cut and fill mining.
The basic components of these rigs are: the translation
system, the drive system, booms, screw or chain feed and
hammers, Fig. 2.30.
These machines can be towed or, more commonly,
self-propelled. The latter are rubber tire, crawler or rail
mounted.
The first is the most used for its great mobility (up to 15
,
..-_-AI
'
.- _
-ELECTRIC
"-OIL
_
WATER
~J
60 x Lv
------
Lv X tb
--+t
I
b
Nb x e
L
+-
VP
1250
Fig. 2.33. Base rotation boom (Atlas Copco).
The feeds can be of the type described before, preferably chain or screw feed. They are lighter than those
used for surface operations and have an advance motor in
back to avoid blows. Apart from the end centralizers,
there are also intermediate centralizers to eliminate bending of the drill steel, as it is usually very long and thin.
As it is not normal to add rods for the drilling of a
round, these can reach 4.20 m in length or even longer.
When the operator has to control several bias tholes, the
feed control can be automatic with detention of drilling at
a prefixed depth or the hammer reaches the end of its
stroke on the feed. It is also normal to install an automatic
system of parallelism to eliminate deviations through
angulation errors, and a medium power collaring device.
The drills are usually rotary-percussive
or rotary,
depending upon the type of rock to be blasted, the drilling
diameter and the required output. These drills differ from
those of surface operations in that they have a lower
profile to be able to correctly drill the contour blastholes
without an excessive inclination which would produce
saw tooth irregularities. For this reason, the rotation
systems of the hammers usually go in the opposite position of those on the surface, remaining inside the feeds.
The drilling diameters depend upon the section of the
tunnels or drifts, and for a rock of medium to hard
strength they can be established as indicated in Table
2.9.
As for these diameters the drill steel, whether of fixed
length or extendable, has diameters between 25 and 37
mm, the underground drills are much lighter than those
for surface operations with lower energies per blow and
higher impact frequencies.
The hammers tend to be hydraulically operated, substituting the pneumatic, for all the advantages described
before, to which must be added a lower contami nation by
oil mist and the elimination of ice problems in the exhausts.
Portal jumbos are used for the drilling of large tunnels
or chambers, Fig. 2.35. These structures are designed for
a specific job and have an opening. or portal. through
which the loading and haulage equipment can pass to
remove the blasted material. The advantage is that the
jumbo does not have to be pulled out of the way. only
moved to a safe distance when blasting.
These jumbos can have several booms, as well as the
man ba<;kets that are operated hydraulically to give easy
access to the blasters when charging the holes or during
support operations.
Tahlc 2'1
__
- -~------.. -~_.
.~._--_
Scction (otJ::':''-l~a\:atcd_(_m~Z)__._.
< 10
10-30
> .10
..
Dnlling Jurnc(cr
:7 .0
3:'-4)
3S51
(rnrn)
\
\
\
",
5600nm
~nm
"
on
I-J
,
Light
Tophammer(38-64 mm)
---<
-----1 _'
Onframewith '
wheels
~------bown
I
lJ_H_ea_vy_------
Light
CJ
---4
_______
..-.:-
r"
0 T H (83-108 mm)
Tophammer(89-127 mm);
Fixedlengthboom
- TeleSCOpIC;;!bOO/Tl-_
-
Tophammer
(89-140mm) J
11of-=-
lJ"t -
II HYDRAULIC
ENERGY
CENTRAL.IZER
AND ClAMP
I
II
DOWN THE
HOLE HAMMER -,
Photo 2.2. Control pannel for the drill. cenlralizer and drill steel
support (Ingersoll-Rand).
~
2Z!l
:i
200
a:
The most sophisticated booms are usually found in
civil engineering operations, as in mining the jobs are
more rutinary and over more unifonn surfaces.
The feeds have: an advance motor. a hammer or rollover head, controls for drilling. centralizer and support
for the drill steel.
When drilling with top hammers these are mounted on
the feeds; and with down the hole hammers the rotation
heads are mounted on the feeds.
The centralizer or clamp-guide assures the proper beginning of the blastholes and makes the changing of drill
steel possible.
The control pannel is usually installed on the feed and
pennits selection of the most adequate drilling parameters for each type of rock.
Thr ,-nnlrnl,
fnr rhr> rr;lt"lHJn r>n"inr>, and lowinl' winch
17!l
Cl.
~
1!l0
125
()
100
i=
o
>C)
a:
T!l
w
~
!So
PROPULSION
MOTORS
OSCLLATIi CRAWl~
SYSTEM
pnprov or nnPllm~tlr~
IIv on (V""r~c;:i{)n~
(~:r
F~
= 31
VP (m/min)
POT
-
DI4
where: POT
Kinetic output power available in hammer
(kW), D Diameter of bias thole (mm).
Therefore, as an example, a hydraulic hammer with a
power of 18 kW that is drilling 100 mm diameter blastholes would achieve a penetration rate, in Barre Granite,
of 0.88 m/min.
For rocks with a compressive strength above 80 MPa,
and when drilling with valveless down the hole hammers,_
the following equation can be applied:
.
VP
=
RC
( 3.5 . I)
RC
X
D2
D11D
=
=
31
127
1.00
0.85
0.72
0.59
0.46
0.41
0.35
0.30
0.25
0.23
0.21
0.19
0.16
114
1.17
1.00
0.84
0.69
0.55
0.48
0.42
0.35
0.30
0.28
0.24
0.22
0.19
102
1.40
1.19
1.00
0.82
0.65
0.57
0.50
0.42
0.35
0.32
0.29
0.26
0.23
89
1.71
1.45
1.22
1.00
0.79
0.70
0.61
0.52
0.43
0.39
0.35
0.32
0.28
76
2.15
1.83
1.54
1.26
1.00
0.88
0.76
0.65
0.54
0.49
0.45
0.40
0.34
70
2.46
2.09
1.75
1.44
1.14
1.00
0.87
0.74
0.62
0.56
0.51
0.45
0.40
64
57
'il
2.83
2.41
2.02
1.65
1.31
1.15
1.00
0.85
0.72
0.65
0.59
0.52
0.46
3.3\
2.82
2.36
1.94
1.54
US
1.17
1.00
0.84
0.76
0.69
0.61
0.54
3.96
3.37
2.83
2.32
184
161
loW
119
100
091
082
0.73
0.65
48
44
4.35
3.71
3.11
2.55
2.02
1.77
1.54
1.31
110
1.00
0.90
0.81
0.72
4.82
4.11
3.45
2.82
2.24
1.97
1.71
1.46
1.22
III
1.00
0.89
0.79
41
5.41
4.61
3.86
3.17
2.51
2.20
1.91
1.63
1.37
1.24
1.12
1.00
0.89
38
6.10
5.19
4.35
3.56
2.82
2.48
2.15
1.84
1.54
1.40
1.26
0.08
1.00
cm\
In order to detennine the Specific Energy and the
Coefficient of Rock Strength CRS, it is necessary to carry
out a simple laboratory test that consists of letting a
weight drop on a rock of about 15 cm3 a determined
number of times and measure the percentage of material
under 0.5 mm (Paone and others, 1969). The relationship
between the Uniaxial Compressive Strength and the CRS
is shown in Fig. 2.50.
A Relationship also exists between the CRS and the
Specific Energy E\. which is indicated in Fig. 2.51.
(Paone, Madson and Bruce, 1969).
C. Drillability Index Ip
This test is carried out in the High Technology School of
Mining Engineers, Madrid (E. T. S. de Ingenieros de
Minas de Madrid), and its purpose is to reproduce the
actual phenomenon of rotary percussion by using an
electric drill that slides along a frame and exerts constant
thrust on the rock to be studied.
The samples, that are the size of a fist, are prepared by
polishing fiat surfaces and then setting them in a pot filled
with plaster to hold them in place, with the fiat surface
parallel to the base.
The drill has a diameter of 9.5 mm and 3 or 4 holes are
made in 3 to 5 seconds, controlled by an electric temporizer. The dust produced is eliminated by blowing with
compressed air.
After testing, the length of the holes are measured with
a micrometric probe to obtain their average value. Afterwards, the Drillability Index I is calculated like the
penetration rate, expressed in inthes per minute.
From the investigations carried out by 1. Bernaola
(1985), in which the actual penetration rates with
hammers of different characteristics, different diameters
and different types of bits are correlated with the drillability indexes obtained on the same rocks, the output for a
given equipment can be predicted by the following steps:
I. Obtention of the drillability index on the rock in
laboratory testing.
2. Definition of the drill hammer characteristics: Ell =
Energy per blow (pounds x foot), n = Number of
.
II
blows per mmute
3. Detennination of the length of the cutting edge Lfof
the drilling tool. For insert bits the following exists:
32
en
a:
10
9
ROCK S7
C)
Z
AGGREGATE
'iKI!
a:
~
en
X20
O'6mm.
:lC
()
a:
~~
u.
~~
~OIl,2mm
OIl.2mm
l~
BRITTLENESS VALUE
iL
u.
()
20 Kg WEIGHT
ROCK
SAMPLE
MlNIA TURE DRILL TIPPED
WITH TUNGSTEN CARBIDE
100
200
UNIAXIAL
300
COMPRESSIVE
400
500 600
STRENGTH
(MPa)
Strength
ASOT A SANDSTONE
a:
loIAIATO SAN)STONE
9.100
X
UJ
st
90
>
~
80
I-
70
a: 60
<!J
Z
()
~
...J
50
a:
40
...J
W
Q.
en
30
o.e
o
1,0
t.O
ROCK STRENGTH
rr;
ROCK ON.. L
10 ROCK ON..L A. ~
Fig. 2.5\
Rdallonship
4,()
COEFFICIENT
20
\0
to
TJoIG AT A ~
01'
20 30 40 50 60 70 80
lOOp.'
BRITTLENESS
tx't"een
the C'>eiticlentlli
(S20)
Cleo
"-
...
W
140
II:
C)
Z
:::;
...J
120
ITACOIITEIIlIAGHETITE I
ILNESTONE
IQUARTZITE I IQAANTlCGNEISS
Lf =. 1.7 D-0.7
where: D =. Bit diameter.
If button bits are used, the drilling rate obtained for the
studied diameter is multiplied by 1.15, and with bevel bits
by 0.85.
4. Calculation of the drilling rate by the fonnula:
VP =.
E x n
K
L'12
'f
x 1O..{)(51 x I + 90)
P
Change of rods
Manual
Time to place rod
Time to remove rod
I.Omin
1.5min
O.9min
I.Omin
2.5 min
1.9min
Table 2.12.
Operation
.____
Time
Change of blasthole
Positioning and collaring
Blas~holecle~~
3 mi n
I mln
.__
I min
c
E
E.. 160
w
I- 140
<{
a:
<!l
ZI
::::;
~
ir
0100
I-
I~
20
2!l
30
_____
DRILL RODS
OF 3,6m
--
DRILL RODS
OF 3m
36
40
4~
DRILLING RATE
(m/h)
...
where:
Indirect Costs. CA
Depreciation ($/h), C/ = Interest
rates and insurance ($/h).
Direct Costs. CM = Maintenance and repair ($/h),
Co = Labor ($/h), CE
Fuel or energy ($/h), CL Oil,
grease and filters ($/h), CB = Bits, rods, sleeves and
shanks ($/h). VM = Mean drilling rate (m/h).
2.11.1 Depreciation
o
-14
W
l-
e(
a:
(!J 120
~
...J
...J
100
I-
CA
+C
160
cro
VM
Fig. 2.56. Drilling rates obtained for different bench heights calculating 5 min. time for changing holes and collaring. and 1.9 min. for rod
manuevering.
C4 + C, + CM + Co + CE + CL
-----------
= (Purchase
80
hours
of life
40
4~
50
rigs.
Number of
operators
Nannal range
Deplh----[jlaiile-l~r
1\EXI~--A\ erage'
(0101)
---_ ..--------
---
-----------~
Pneumatic
Hand held drill 20 kg
Hand held drill 30 kg
Dn II wagon on wheels (small)
Drill wagon on wheels
Dniling ng on crawlers (lOp hammers)
Dniling ng on crawlers (Jown-the-holehamll1er)
}{Ydrtwlrc
Rig on cTawlers ('lI1alll
LarFe f1~ un -_._
cr4wkrs
..__
.~-
mum
10
2.0
50
70
100
JO.O
200
30.0
4S-M
64-100
S5-150
-------------
--,"-
._---_._-
..
Average.
drilling
rate (m/h)
Compressor
Air /lor
(lis)
(MPa)
30
60
SO
200
JOO-J'iO
200
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.7
1.2
pressure--
\011
15
3.0
80
120
20.0
32-3S
38-45
3S-48
:'0-7:'
64-12:'
(01)
---~_._-------
Penetration
rale \emf
Olin)
1:'0
1
1
1-2
1-2
1-2
1-2
25
35
45
55
60
40
100
I:' 0
12
1-2
80
100
6
13
16
19
13
25
70
35
SO
0.7
0.7
Table 2.14.
Repair factor
Spare parts
only
Equipment (pneumatic)
4-6%
3-5%
8-12%
6-10%
6-10%
8-12%
12-20%
16-24%
6-10%
12-20%
2-3%
4-6%
--
C/
x Purchase price x
2N
= ------
% (interest
insurance + taxes)
= Number
= [(Purchase
price)
1.000] x FR (%)
where:
0.85.
Anderson, B. F.: DoWl'l-the-Hole Blasthole Drill Jumbos for Underground Stoping. Underground Methods Handbook. AIME, 1982.
Arenas, S.: Sistemas de Peiforacion para Mineria y Construccion.
Canteras Y ExplofQCiones.Julio, 1985.
Atlas Copco: Manual Atlas Copco. 4th edition, 1984.
Auranen, I. PeiforacilJll en Minas a Cie/o Abierro. Las Ventajas de /a
Peiforacion Hidtiutlica. Tamrock News.
Bernaola, 1: Prediccian de la Velocidad de Peiforacion a Percusion
Mediante &saya de Laboratorio Sobre Muestras de Roca. E.T.S.
Ingenieros de Minas de Madrid. Tesis Doctoral, 1986.
Bernaola, J.: Fundamentos de la Peiforacion Percutiva. II Seminario
de Ingenierl'a de Arranque de Rocas con Explosivos en Proyectos
Sublerraneos. Fundaci6n G6mez-Pardo, 1987.
Clark, G. B.: Principles of Rock Drilling. Colorado School of Mines.
April, 1979.
Clemman, R.J.: The lNsign of Percussive Drilling Bits. Mining &
Mineral Engineering. March, 1965.
Frey, G.R.: Rotary Drills. Underground Mining Methods Handbook,
AIME,1982.
Gadner Denver: Rock Drilling Data. 1986.
Hulkkonem, K. Nunas Tendencias en la Peiforacion de Barrenos
Largos. Tamrock News.
Ingersoll-Rand.lnjormtlcion Tecnica.
Kurt, E.H.: COnl'entional Small Drilling EqUipment. Underground
Mining Methods Handbook, AIME, 1982.
Marshall, D. R.: Progress in Down the Hole Drilling. The Quarry
Managers Journal. August, 1962.
Menendez, E: Peiforacibn a Roropercusion-Martillo en Cabeza. 11
Seminario de Ingenierl'a de Arranque de Rocas con Explosivos en
Proyectos Subterra.neos. Fundaci6n Gomez-Pardo, 1987.
Mission: Percussion Drilling Equipment Operation and Maintenance
Manual. Mission Drilling Products Division. 1985.
Montan, L.: Recent De\'e!opments in Underground Mining Methods
and Machinery Fifth Australian Tunneling, Sydney. 1984.
Morales, Y.: Peiforacibn Percutiva. Manillos en Fondo. II Seminario
de Ingenieria de Arranque de Rocas con Explosivos en Proyectos
Subterr:meos. Fundacion Gomez-Pardo. 1987.
Morrel, RJ. & H. E lInger: Drilling Machines. Suiface. Mining Engineering Handbook. AIME. 1973.
Patrucco. N.: Las Perforadoras de Manillo en Fondo. Caracteristicas
y Campo de Empleo. Canteras y Explotaciones. Julio. 1982.
Peach. A.J.: Increasing Subsuiface Excavation Productivity with Computers. Fifth Australian Tunneling. Sydney. 1984.
Pia, f et al.: Curso de Perforacibn y Voladura. Fundaci6n GomezPardo. 1978.
Roos. H. H.:Percussion Drill-Jumbos. Underground Mining Methods
Handbook. AIME. 1982.
Sandvik: Rock Drilling Manual - Rock Drilling Tool Applications.
1985.
Slenmark. E.: Equipos \" Mhodos AlitlUlk pam Miner/a y Obms
Subterraneas. 1982.
Tamrock: Handbook of Underground Drilling. J 983.
Tamrock: Handbook on Surface Drilling and Blasting. 1989.
Tandanand. S.: Pnnnpies of Dn'/ling. Mining Engineering Handbook.
AIME.1973.