Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
The
Genucentric
Knee
Orthosis
( F i g . 1) offers a u n i q u e polycentric
( G e n u c e n t r i c ) joint a s a n alternative to
F i g . 1. A n t e r i o r a n d m e d i c a l view o f t h e G e n u c e n t r i c K n e e O r t h o s i s .
ceived by the a u t h o r s a n d d e v e l o p e d at
the V e t e r a n s A d m i n i s t r a t i o n Prosthetics
Center ( V A P C ) , this orthosis features
lightweight
construction,
improved
cosmesis,
supracondylar-suprapatellar
suspension, a n d a knee-tracking c a p a
bility that eliminates p i s t o n i n g a n d m i
g r a t i o n . T h e m o s t distinct feature is the
G e n u c e n t r i c joint (Figs. 2 a n d 3), with
its ability to a p p r o x i m a t e its instan
t a n e o u s center of rotation with the struc
turally
sound
and/or
pathologically
d e r a n g e d knee. Clinical results thus far
i n d i c a t e that the intended g o a l of de
s i g n i n g a polycentric joint to a c c o m m o
d a t e the a n a t o m i c a l knee, such as to
e l i m i n a t e completely the joint as a source
of p i s t o n i n g at the orthosis-limb inter
face, h a s b e e n achieved.
T h e Genucentric Joint
A d e t a i l e d description of the m e c h a n i
cal aspects of the Genucentric j o i n t m u s t
F i g . 2 . C l o s e - u p view o f G e n u c e n t r i c J o i n t .
F i g . 3. C l o s e - u p view o f G e n u c e n t r i c J o i n t fully
flexed.
t o d a y utilize a m o v i n g center-or-rotation
to r e d u c e pistoning. However, they
p r o v i d e only one ideal p a t h of instant
centers a n d lack the flexibility n e e d e d to
c o n f o r m to individual v a r i a t i o n s f o u n d
in healthy a s well as p a t h o l o g i c a l l y de
r a n g e d knees. By contrast, the slotted
disk s a n d w i c h e d between the thigh a n d
c a l f sections p e r m i t s the instant center
of the G e n u c e n t r i c j o i n t to m o v e t h r o u g h
a variety of p a t h s , thereby allowing the
j o i n t to follow the p a t h of the individual
a n a t o m i c a l knee while p r o v i d i n g the
necessary s u p p o r t ( F i g s . 4 a n d 5 ) . Plots
of the instant center, using the m e t h o d s
outlined by F r a n k e l a n d B u r s t e i n , show
a c o n c e n t r a t e d locus o f centers that lie
within a 2 . 5 c m circle, i n d i c a t i n g that the
m o t i o n s of the G e n u c e n t r i c j o i n t c a n
m i m i c the m o t i o n s of the a n a t o m i c a l
j o i n t . L i k e the a n a t o m i c a l knee, the
G e n u c e n t r i c joint h a s a sliding a s well a s
a rolling c o m p o n e n t in its m o t i o n . T r a n s
verse r o t a t i o n o f the a n a t o m i c a l knee
was not considered significant in the
d e s i g n of the Genucentric joint since this
m o t i o n is a d e q u a t e l y a b s o r b e d by the
soft tissues between the skeletal m e m b e r s
a n d the cuff sections.
Polypropylene is u s e d in the construc
tion o f the G e n u c e n t r i c j o i n t b e c a u s e it
afforded the opportunity to m a k e the
joints continuous with a n intimately
fitting polypropylene calf a n d thigh
cuffs ( F i g . 5 ) . T h i s was a c c o m p l i s h e d
d u r i n g m o l d i n g by e x t e n d i n g the thigh
piece below the k n e e center on the cast,
t e r m i n a t i n g in a semicircle. T h e calf
piece w a s e x t e n d e d a s e q u a l d i s t a n c e
a b o v e the knee center a n d thigh p i e c e ,
t e r m i n a t i n g in a similar m a n n e r . T h i s
p r o v i d e d a circle of o v e r l a p p i n g plastic
a b o u t the knee center within which to
construct the j o i n t . S a n d w i c h e d between
the plastic cuff extensions a r e a l u m i n u m
disks with two holes drilled in a hori
zontal p l a n e . (See f a b r i c a t i o n s e q u e n c e
below.) T h e holes p r o v i d e the r e q u i r e d
F i g . 4 . A s k n e e is flexed, it's i n s t a n t a n e o u s c e n t e r o f r o t a t i o n is d u p l i c a t e d by t h e G e n u c e n t r i c J o i n t .
F i g . 6. A . A n t e r i o r view o f p o s i t i v e m o d e l s h o w i n g b u i l d u p s p a r a l l e l to t h e a n t e r i o r r e f e r e n c e l i n e . B . M e d i a l
view o f p o s i t i v e m o d e l s h o w i n g j o i n t b u i l d u p s , f l a r e e x t e n s i o n s , a n d t r i m lines.
3. T a p e a 3 m m - t h i c k b l a n k alu
m i n u m disk that is l a r g e r in d i a m e t e r
t h a n p r o p o s e d joint d i a m e t e r , to kneej o i n t position on thigh cuff ( F i g . 7 A ) .
M o l d calf cuff over both thigh cuff ex
tension a n d disk (Fig. 7 B ) .
4 . R e m o v e calf cuff after cooling a n d
trim to trim lines.
5. H a n d - m o l d tongues on cast using 2
mm-thick
low
density
polyethylene.
Skive tongues where they fit u n d e r cuffs.
6. A t t a c h reinforced Velcro straps,
tongues, a n d 25 m m stainless steel loops
reinforced with l a m i n a t e d D a c r o n t a p e ,
to cuffs.
7. P l a c e c o m p l e t e d cuffs on c a s t : 3
m m s p a c e s p a r a l l e l to b o t h the m i d -
F i g . 7. A . T h i g h c u f f with b l a n k a l u m i n u m d i s k o n c a s t . B . C a l f c u f f m o l d e d over t h i g h c u f f a n d b l a n k d i s k .
C . B o t h cuffs in p o s i t i o n a f t e r t r i m m i n g a n d p o l i s h i n g . J o i n t s p a c e s for a l u m i n u m disks s h o u l d b e p a r a l l e l in
all p l a n e s .
F i g . 8. D i m e n s i o n s o f t h e disk.
F i g . 9. A . R e f e r e n c e l i n e s t r a n s f e r r e d f r o m p o s i t i v e m o d e l to t h i g h cuff. B . D i s k s a r e p o s i t i o n e d o v e r refer
e n c e l i n e s . A n t e r i o r p i v o t s a n d d i s t a l # 3 0 h o l e s in disks a r e m a r k e d a n d d r i l l e d t h r o u g h p l a s t i c .
F i g . 1 0 . C l o s e - u p o f disk b e i n g r o t a t e d a b o u t a n t e
rior p i v o t . A p e n c i l is u s e d to s c r i b e p a t h t h a t s t o p
travels t h r o u g h .
Clinical Experience
T h e G e n u c e n t r i c K n e e Orthosis w a s
delivered to patients with m e d i o l a t e r a l
instability a n d / o r g e n u r e c u r v a t u m of
the knee. Following a r e reviews o f four
case studies o f patients who have worn the
device for sufficient p e r i o d s of time to
o b t a i n m e a n i n g f u l results.
1. Patient B . C . , a 24-year-old active
m a l e , an automobile body-and-fender
m a n , s u s t a i n e d g u n s h o t w o u n d s of the
left femur in 1 9 7 0 . R e s u l t i n g deformi
ties i n c l u d e : limited range-of-knee m o
tion (15 to 100 d e g . ) , g e n u v a r u m of 22
degrees, a n d a one-inch shortening. T h e
patient's m a j o r c o m p l a i n t was p a i n at
the lateral aspect o f the knee on s t a n d i n g ,
walking a n d s q u a t t i n g , which resulted in
loss of t i m e f r o m work. B . C . w a s ori
ginally p r o v i d e d with a d o u b l e b a r K A F O
with corrective p a d s . However, d u e to
weight,
bulk
and
overall extensive
b r a c i n g , he refused to wear the device.
A n elastic h i n g e d knee orthosis was then
p r e s c r i b e d , b u t while the p a t i e n t liked
the weight a n d f r e e d o m o f the orthosis,
his condition worsened.
T h e clinic t e a m , in April 1 9 7 8 , de
c i d e d to provide B . C . with a G e n u c e n
tric K n e e Orthosis. After w e a r i n g this
orthosis for five weeks, the patient was
seen in the clinic for follow-up e x a m i n a
tion. H e w a s a b l e to walk a n d s t a n d with
less p a i n a n d his deformities were con
trolled. In a d d i t i o n , h e f o u n d the ortho
sis to b e lightweight, cosmetic a n d c o m
fortable, a n d it p r o v i d e d sufficient free
d o m for his n e e d s . D u r i n g seven m o n t h s
o f w e a r i n g this orthosis, the p a t i e n t h a s
experienced no problems
concerning
function or wear of c o m p o n e n t s .
A l t h o u g h J . A . still h a d p a i n , he n o
l o n g e r e x p e r i e n c e d the s h a r p p a i n h e h a d
with previous devices. L a x i t y in both A - P
a n d M - L p l a n e s were well c o n t r o l l e d ;
the patient f o u n d the orthosis to b e light
weight a n d c o s m e t i c , a n d it d i d not
piston a s previous devices h a d ( F i g . 1 4 ) .
3. Patient M . L . ( F i g . 1 5 ) , a 55-yearo l d m a l e , suffered a h e a d injury in 1 9 4 5 ,
s e c o n d a r y to shell f r a g m e n t w o u n d s ,
with resulting h e m i p l e g i a o n his right
s i d e . H e walks with a spasticequinova
q u a d r i c e p s a r e g o o d a n d h e is s t a b l e
while s t a n d i n g a n d walking. M . L . was
provided with a single b a r A F O with 90d e g r e e p l a n t a r stop a n d v a r u s corrective
s t r a p . With the p a s s a g e of time, stresses
F i g . 1 3 . P a t i e n t J . A . N o r m a l k n e e m o t i o n s a r e u n r e s t r i c t e d e v e n w h i l e h e is s e a t e d , e n h a n c i n g b o t h c o m f o r t
a n d cosmesis.
Summary
T h e G e n u c e n t r i c K n e e Orthosis e m
ploys a u n i q u e new j o i n t to e l i m i n a t e
p i s t o n i n g . T h i s is d u e to the c a p a b i l i t y
of the j o i n t to d u p l i c a t e the m o t i o n of
the individual a n a t o m i c a l knee it con
trols. W i t h pistoning e l i m i n a t e d , a n d
with a firm f o u n d a t i o n p r o v i d e d by its
supracondylar-suprapatellar
suspension
system, m i g r a t i o n of the orthosis b e c o m e s
clinically
undetectable,
even
after
lengthy p e r i o d s o f active u s e . In a d d i t i o n ,
to further e n h a n c e patient comfort a n d
a c c e p t a n c e o f this u n i q u e rehabilitation
a p p r o a c h , the orthosis is f a b r i c a t e d of
lightweight plastic utilizing v a c u u m f o r m i n g a n d d r a p e - m o l d i n g techniques.
T h e G e n u c e n t r i c K n e e Orthosis is
presently b e i n g clinically tested on p a
tients with various knee p r o b l e m s ; four
patients h a v e thus far worn the device
for sufficient p e r i o d s of time to c o m p i l e
definitive results. In e a c h c a s e , the p a
tient f o u n d the orthosis to b e c o m f o r t a b l e
a n d non-restrictive to the desired m o
tions of the l i m b . Neither wear nor m e
c h a n i c a l failure h a v e b e e n observed, even
t h o u g h s o m e of these patients a r e y o u n g
a n d quite active.
Acknowledgments
T h e authors would like to express
their a p p r e c i a t i o n to K e n n e t h L a B l a n c ,
Senior T e c h n i c a l Specialist, a n d M a x
Nacht,
T e c h n i c a l Writer, for their
c o o p e r a t i o n a n d assistance in p r e p a r i n g
Footnotes
1Orthotist, V e t e r a n s Administration Prosthetics
Center, 252 Seventh Avenue, New York, New York
10001
2Orthotist-Prosthetist, Veterans Administration
Prosthetics Center, 2 5 2 Seventh Avenue, N e w
York, New York 10001
3 T h e t e r m " G e n u c e n t r i c " h a s b e e n c o i n e d to dis
tinguish o u r unique polycentric joint from the
polycentric joint now in c o m m o n use.
References
(1) Frankel, Victor H . , a n d Burstein, Albert H . ,
Orthopaedic
Biomechanics,
(Philadelphia:
L e a a n d Febiger, 1970), p p . 118-144
( 2 ) K a p a n d j i , I . A . , The Physiology
of the Joints,
Vol. T w o , (Edinburgh-London-New York:
Churchill Livingstone, 1970), p p . 86-91
(3) S m i d t , Gary L . , "Biomechanical Analysis of
K n e e F l e x i o n a n d E x t e n s i o n , "Journal
of Bio
mechanics,
V o l . 6, ( G r e a t B r i t a i n - N e w Y o r k :
P e r g a m o n Press, J a n u a r y 1973), p p . 79-91