Running head: HUMAN RESOURCES

Human Resources
Name
University

HUMAN RESOURCES

Abstract
This paper aims to address different issues identified in the case study on the basis of
factual information provided in the case. The facts of the case are gathered and analyzed in order
to evaluate the effectiveness of the decision and the pertaining situation in the organization.
Decision making has associated strengths and weaknesses, the strengths and weaknesses of
CEOs decision in the case are analyzed in the paper. Managers role is very important in case of
decision making by the CEO. In order to complete the analysis of the prevalent situation in the
company and for recommendations, the reaction of the employees with mixed feelings is also
analyzed in the paper.

HUMAN RESOURCES

Human Resources
The case has been built around the decision of CEO in regard to the employees of the
company. Managers of the company put themselves at the back of CEO decision in this regard.
Layoffs and other changes in the organization can be succeeded with support from different
levels of the management. This paper aims to address different issues identified in the case study
on the basis of factual information provided in the case. CEO decision was restricted and
reaction is apparent form the employees. In the paper, the factual information of the case is
gathered first and then issues related to the persisting situation are identified. The problem of the
case is identified in the later part with certain and noticeable advices. CEO decision has various
pros and cons and associated strengths and weaknesses.
The CEO ought to be noticeable and accessible to directors and representatives.
Preceding layoffs, CEO ought to give honing to the supervisors to help them in conveying
passionate news. The CEO has an effective impact in case of personal touch when he is willing
to convey an announcement to the chiefs and representatives with respect to the need for these
extreme activities and what he accepts will be the effect on the organization's future. In any
event, the CEO ought to present supervisors with a composed, arranged explanation that they can
impart to all workers. Face to face interaction and the spread of decision with the assistance of
opinion leaders would have created favorable situation for the CEO.
Before layoffs, CEO should keep in the lines of open correspondence in regards to the
condition of the organization. Keeping awful news from representatives never works. They
frequently hear through the grapevine or even the news media that the organization is battling. In
the event that you don't impart this data to them, you are setting yourself up for a larger number

HUMAN RESOURCES

of difficulties than you anticipated as the workforce gets to be disheartened and incredulous of
authority. Never forget, on the off chance that you don't tell representatives what is going on,
they will make it up. Impart straightforwardly and sincerely. Fill in the data holes for your
workers. Offer business sector information and the condition of the organization's benefits, and
keep them educated of conceivable future activities. Try not to make a domain of doubt by lying
or bypassing the genuine circumstance. It is verging on difficult to recover trust once individuals
realize that you have misled them.
In a few firms the CEO settles on all the major decisions. In different firms decisions are
all the more plainly the result of accord among the top administrators. On the off chance that
distinctive people have diverse opinions, then the appropriation of basic leadership power inside
firms may influence which decisions are made (Boxall, Purcell & Wright, 2008). Administrative
choices might influence firm results, however in the event that they do, both official attributes
and hierarchical variables could impact firm execution. Managers who support CEO on the
major decisions are always considered valuable employees of the company. Data-driven decision
management (DDDM) is a way to deal with business administration that quality choice that can
be moved down with undeniable information. The achievement of the information driven
methodology is dependent upon the nature of the information accumulated and the viability of its
investigation and translation. Integrative decision-making keeps you concentrated on how the
greater part of the moving parts of your business cooperate. This decision-making process begins
with taking a gander at all variables that assume a part or that will be influenced by decisions that
you make. For instance, before cutting specialists' hours, you should seriously mull over
variables, for example, the individual effect on laborers and their families, or the unfavorable
effects on client benefit that having fewer laborers on staff would bring. You would continue

HUMAN RESOURCES

burrowing for more variables to consider until variables not yet considered turn out to be rare.
You're then ready to decide how all variables are interrelated and resolve every variable with an
eye on how every determination changes the whole picture.
To take part in integrative decision-making, an entrepreneur or supervisor must take part
in basic considering. In the event that the decision-producer does not think fundamentally, he
will be not able consolidation the two or more decisions. Since the decision-creator will utilize
basic deduction aptitudes, he will probably be more fruitful in really measuring the advantages
and shortcomings of every alternative, enhancing the odds that the decision he makes is the best
one. Integrative decision-making advances the utilization of imagination, something that can
demonstrate profitable in the realm of business. At the point when taking part in this sort of
decision-making, decision-producers must not just indicate maybe a couple alternatives, but
rather concoct inventive approaches to blend the two and, in doing as such, likely uncover some
not-beforehand considered choices. With this utilization of imagination comes an improved
probability that the decision the individual at last reaches will be the best one. A definitive worry
of any business decision-producer is making decisions that his clients will like. In the event that
a decision-producer is equipped for joining numerous choices, he enhances his odds of
addressing his clients' needs. Since fulfilled clients mean deals, addressing client needs is of
principal significance inside the business circle. Collective choices can prompt better decision
results by conveying to tolerate a more extensive scope of points of view. By assigning a
decision to a gathering, an association can make compelling utilization of the abilities and
information of its workers. One more of the advantages of cooperative choice making in an
association is its impact on worker inspiration. Giving chances to partake in decisions is an

HUMAN RESOURCES

approach to give workers a voice in something significant. Doing as such can affect work
fulfillment, authoritative responsibility, singular inspiration, and occupation execution.
Decision-making in organizations has the capability to influence its mission and vision.
Therefore, even as the study was being conducted, one of the primary aims was to come up with
solutions to the institutions that still did not embrace the art of devoting the best time in
conducting good decision-making sessions. Ten enthusiastic members carried out the study, for
almost two months. The key purpose of this first phase was to make it obvious that still most
organizations did not come up with decisions, even though they performed fairly well. Some
important tools were employed throughout the process, like team coordination, collective
decision-making and corporation among the team members. By the end of the second month, the
team managed to collect some data that were later analyzed to come up with the finals. It was
found out that a number of factors affected the decisions made by big organizations. They were
grouped in to three categories as environmental issues, organizational issues, and perception
issues. Perception issues can be expounded on as the way individual view their environment of
operation. Such mentalities influence the decisions they make.
Employees responses to change are affected by various components. It is sensible to
anticipate that workers will respond since the procedure of progress includes going from the
known not obscure, and when workers respond, it is critical to recognize between the side effects
of their responses also, the causes behind them. Taking after is an examination of three variables
that examination emphatically distinguishes as impacting Employees responses to change:
Employees feelings and perceptions, correspondence, and Employees support in decision
making. Proof proposes that these variables clarify quite a bit of Employees responses,
seemingly more than different elements present amid authoritative change. In spite of the fact

HUMAN RESOURCES

that these elements are nearly related and can even be viewed as intertwined from numerous
points of view, every element contributes individual and essential data. Hierarchical change is
vital for organizations to stay focused in today's market (Mondy & Martocchio, 2016). To
effectively execute change activities, change operators must get it that the part of representatives
is exceptionally imperative, what's more, representatives' responses to change are affected by
various components, counting representatives' feelings and insights, correspondence, and support
in decision making. Change operators can apply the Spectrum of Employees' Reactions to
Hierarchical Change as a one of a kind model that shows how representatives respond to change.
This model is situated in the idea that the level of representatives' acknowledgment of or
resistance is an imperative element that change specialists ought to look at. Generally speaking,
this paper gives OD specialists critical data about workers' responses to change, and associations
will advantage from further research in this field. Numerous individuals trust in the expectation
standard, as indicated by which a specialist's goal in playing out a demonstration can at times
make a demonstration that would some way or another have been admissible impermissible,
different things being equivalent. On the off chance that legitimate, these cases would appear to
given occasion to feel qualms about the goal standard.
Hierarchical structure is especially critical for decision making. Most organizations either
have a tall or level authoritative structure. Little organizations for the most part utilize a level
hierarchical structure. For instance, a chief can report specifically to the president rather than an
executive, and her partners are just two levels beneath the president. Level structures empower
little organizations to settle on speedier decisions, as they are frequently becoming quickly with
new items and need this adaptability. The Business Plan, an online reference site, says little
organizations ought not stress over authoritative structure, unless they have no less than 15

HUMAN RESOURCES

workers. The reason is that representatives in to a great degree little associations have various
obligations, some of which can incorporate numerous capacities. For instance, an item chief
additionally may be in charge of showcasing examination and publicizing. Expansive
associations regularly have numerous levels or echelons of administration. As a littler association
develops, it can choose to include more administration levels. Parts turn out to be more
characterized. Thusly, it is critical to know which individuals direct certain capacities.
Appropriate human resources are assigned the project management of products and
services development. Products and services of the organization are developed by quality and
experienced staff of the company. Organizational success is also dependent upon the quality of
human resource that is required for management of projects. Project management is obviously
directed by the management of organization but the role subordinate staff in the completion of
projects cant be ignored. Human Resources in an organization are utilized for multipurpose.
Development of human resources is not only required for individual success but also it is
required for organizational growth. Project management is always carried out by experienced and
skillful staff. Organizations develop their human resources from time to time in order to keep up
their pace with markets. Therefore, the importance of human resource in in project management
of companies cant be ignored. Human resources practices are vital in the success of
organizational project.
Human resources is one of the area that contributes towards the success of organization.
In the planning and management of business operations, the importance of human resources
capacity and capacity development cant be neglected. Human resource management is
challenged by numerous factors across the world. Planning, recruitment, staff development and
deployment are some of the challenges that have hindered the human resource practices. Human

HUMAN RESOURCES

resource capacity is fundamental issue that is persistent to human resource practices. Capacity
building is important for businesses in order to assume growth in future. Human resource
capacity determines the existing skills level of employees working in an organization. Capacity
building workshops are required for enhancement of skills in order to achieve growth and
development objectives of the company. Products and services of the organization are developed
by quality and experienced staff of the company. Companys human resource capacity is not only
subjected to the progress of organizational success but also it is mandatory for employees in
terms of their personal growth. Human resources is also utilized for project management
purposes in the organization. Project management in an organization is supported by the efforts
of staff that is charged with the responsibility of project management. Quality human resource is
required for operations of project management. For instance, the development of new product
and services in the organization is an ongoing project in the organization.
Organizations have to encounter numerous problems in the course of their operations.
Problem solving approach of an organization is plausible idea for achievement of success in the
future through eradication of resistance in the way. Problem solving requires series of steps.
Organizations have to face different problems; therefore separate analysis is required to address
different nature of problems. Organizations have to follow established criteria in order to propose
remedy for the persisting problematic situation.
Managers in the organizations are charged with the responsibility to address the
problematic situations. They are supposed to establish proactive approach in order to fix the
problem. Their objective is not only subjected to implementation of solution to the existing
problem but also they aim to ignore future occurrences of such events. Critical thinking requires
straightforward correspondence where everybody's worries and perspectives are uninhibitedly

HUMAN RESOURCES

10

communicated. Yes, correspondence in organization is a crucial need. Compelling

correspondence towards critical thinking for problem solving happens due to a pioneer's capacity
to encourage a debate between individuals who believe her expectations and feel that they are in
a protected situation to share why they trust the issue happened and in addition particular
arrangements.
The significance of authoritative structure is especially pivotal for correspondence.
Authoritative structure empowers the conveyance of power. At the point when a man begins a
vocation, he knows from the very first moment to whom he will report. Most organizations pipe
their correspondence through division pioneers. For instance, showcasing representatives will
talk about different issues with their executive. The executive, thusly, will talk about these issues
with the VP or upper administration. Hierarchical structure is imperative for assessing
representative execution. The straight structure of practical and item authoritative structures
permit managers to better assess the work of their subordinates. Managers can assess the abilities
representatives illustrate, how they coexist with different specialists, and the convenience in
which they finish their work (Need, 2006). Thus, directors can all the more promptly finish
semiannual or yearly execution evaluations, which are generally obligatory in many
organizations.
Hierarchical structure is especially critical in accomplishing objectives and results.
Authoritative structure takes into account the levels of leadership. Office pioneers are
accountable for assigning errands and undertakings to subordinates so the office can meet
venture due dates. Basically, authoritative structure encourages collaboration, where everybody
in the office progresses in the direction of a shared objective. Hierarchical structure empowers
organizations to better oversee change in the commercial center, including buyer needs,

HUMAN RESOURCES

11

government direction and new innovation. Office heads and administrators can meet, diagram
different issue zones, and think of an answer as a gathering. Change can be normal in any
industry. Organization pioneers dependably ought to endeavor to locate the best authoritative
structure to meet those progressions.
In my opinion, the decisions of the CEO and the situation of the organization can be
improved if the managers and staff of the company would have assumed their duties and roles
effectively. The case revolves around the decision on CEO and the pertaining situation in the
organization. There are different aspects which are considered in the analysis of the case for
considerable implications. In a few firms the CEO settles on all the major decisions. In different
firms decisions are all the more plainly the result of accord among the top administrators. Offer
business sector information and the condition of the organization's benefits, and keep them
educated of conceivable future activities. Preceding layoffs, CEO ought to give honing to the
supervisors to help them in conveying passionate news. Layoffs and other changes in the
organization can be succeeded with support from different levels of the management.

HUMAN RESOURCES

12

References
Boxall, P., Purcell, J., & Wright, P. M. (2008). Human Resource Management.
Need, W. C. D. H. P. (2006). Human resource management: Gaining a competitive advantage.
Mondy, R., & Martocchio, J. J. (2016). Human resource management. Pearson.