Management Dashboard - Issues & Risks

Issue Summary

Open
Closed
In Progress
Monitoring
Resolved
Low Impact
Med Impact
High Impact
Low Priority
Med Priority
High Priority
Total Issues

0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0

Open
Closed
In Progress
Monitoring
Resolved
Low
Moderate
High
Extreme
Total Risks

0
0
0
0
0

Strategic
Financial
Regulatory
Management
Operational

Issue Type Summary

Strategic
Financial
Regulatory
Management
Operational

Is s ue Status

Risk Summary

1
0
1
0
0
0
0
2
0
2

Open

Closed

In Progress

Open

Closed

In Progress

Monitoring

Resolved

Risk Status
Monitoring

Resolved

Risk Type Summary

0
0
0
0
1

50%

Risk & Issue Types

50%

Total Risk Ratings

2.5

1.2
1

0.8

Risk Type

0.6

Issue Type

0.4

1.5
1
0.5

0.2
0

0
Strategic

Financial

Last Review Date: 25-05-2016

Regulatory

Management

Operational

Low

Moderate

High

Extreme

Record Number: 00676480

Al-Ain Slaughter House- Risk Register

Ref
No
R1
R2

Risk Type

Date
Logged

Risk Control Area /Phase

Contraints

Operational
Environmental

5/24/2016
5/24/2016

Design & Engineering

Handover

Time, Cost, Quality

Time, Cost, Quality

Risk
Lack of detailed information
Effluent not complient

Action Owner

Likelihood Rating

Likelihood

Impact
Rating

Impact

Risk
Rating

Proposal
Project

B
D

Likely
Unlikely

2
4

Minor
Major

H
H

Page 2 of 6

Risk Mitigation
Actions
Early orders
Process calcs

Last
Reviewed

Current
Status

24/05/16
Open
25/05/16 In Progress

AS/NZ Standard 4360:2004 Risk Management

Each risk has been rated in terms of its resulting likelihood of occurrence and the potential impact, using the rating system specified in AS/NZ
STANDARD 4360:2004 Risk Management. These are explained in the tables below.

Table 1 - Types of Issues/Risks

Type

Description

Related strategic mission and objectives.

Strategic
economic
impact (costs,
revenues,Political
budgets).
Related to legal
and contractual
obligations.
legislative
Financial
Regulatory (Compliance)impacts.
Related
to
decision
making,
resources,
policies,
etc.
Management
Operational (Technical) Related to ICT delivery, support or management services.

Table 2 - Qualitative Measure of Consequences of Likelihood

Level

Descriptor

A
B
C
D
E

Almost certain
Likely
Possible
Unlikely
Rare

Description

Is expected to occur in most circumstances.

Will probably occur in most circumstances.
Might occur at some time.
Could occur at some time.
May occur in exceptional circumstances.

More than once per year

1 in 1 - 3 years
1 in 3 - 5 years
1 in 5 - 10 years
1 in 10 years

Table 3 - Qualitative Measure of Consequences of Impact

Level

Description

Insignificant

Minor

Moderate

Major

Catastrophic

Example detail description

No injuries, low financial loss, no risk to

reputation.
Minor First aid treatment, on-site release
immediately contained, medium financial loss,
some customer dissatisfaction.
Medical treatment required, on-site release
contained with outside assistance, high
financial loss and public visibility.
Major Extensive injuries, loss of production
capability, invocation of disaster recovery with
no detrimental effects, major financial loss.
Death, off-site with detrimental effect, huge
financial loss.

Table 4 - Quantitative Measure of Consequences of Impact

Level

Description

1
2
3
4
5

Insignificant
Minor
Moderate
Major
Catastrophic

Example detail description

Nil Negligible
Under 500K
Between $500k - $5m
Between $5m - $20m
Above $20m

Table 5 - Qualitative Risk Analysis Matrix

Consequences

Likelihood:
A (almost certain)
B (likely)
C (possible)
D (unlikely)
E (rare)

Insignificant

Minor

Moderate

Major

H
M
L
L
L

H
H
M
L
L

E
H
H
M
M

E
E
E
H
H

E
E
E
E
H

Key

E
H
M
L

Description

Extreme Risk: Immediate action required to mitigate the risk.

High Risk: Action should be taken to compensate for the risk.
Moderate Risk: Action should be taken to monitor the risk.
Low Risk: Routine acceptance of the risk.

Table 6 - Issues/Risks status types

Type

Open
Closed
In progress
Monitoring
Resolved

Description

New item identified and awaiting action.

Item closed e.g. no longer a concern, rejected, etc.
Item undergoing treatment/mitigation activities.
Treatment/Mitigiation activities complete and being monitored.
Item resolved through treatment/mitigation actions and resolution
accepted by stakeholders.

Catastrophic

Al-Ain Slaughter House- Issue Register

Ref No

Issue Type

Date Logged

Issue Control Area

Impact

Priority

I1

<select>

<select>

<select>

<select>

I2

<select>

<select>

<select>

<select>

I3

<select>

<select>

<select>

<select>

I4

<select>

<select>

<select>

<select>

I5

<select>

<select>

<select>

<select>

I6

<select>

<select>

<select>

<select>

I7

<select>

<select>

<select>

<select>

I8

<select>

<select>

<select>

<select>

I9

<select>

<select>

<select>

<select>

I10

<select>

<select>

<select>

<select>

I11

<select>

<select>

<select>

<select>

I12

<select>

<select>

<select>

<select>

I13

<select>

<select>

<select>

<select>

I14

<select>

<select>

<select>

<select>

I15

<select>

<select>

<select>

<select>

I16

<select>

<select>

<select>

<select>

I17

<select>

<select>

<select>

<select>

I18

<select>

<select>

<select>

<select>

I19

<select>

<select>

<select>

<select>

I20

<select>

<select>

<select>

<select>

I21

<select>

<select>

<select>

<select>

I22

<select>

<select>

<select>

<select>

I23

<select>

<select>

<select>

<select>

I24

<select>

<select>

<select>

<select>

I25

<select>

<select>

<select>

<select>

I26

<select>

<select>

<select>

<select>

I27

<select>

<select>

<select>

<select>

I28

<select>

<select>

<select>

<select>

I29

<select>

<select>

<select>

<select>

I30

<select>

<select>

<select>

<select>

I31

<select>

<select>

<select>

<select>

I32

<select>

<select>

<select>

<select>

I33

<select>

<select>

<select>

<select>

I34

<select>

<select>

<select>

<select>

I35

<select>

<select>

<select>

<select>

I36

<select>

<select>

<select>

<select>

I37

<select>

<select>

<select>

<select>

I38

<select>

<select>

<select>

<select>

I39

<select>

<select>

<select>

<select>

I40

<select>

<select>

<select>

<select>

I41

<select>

<select>

<select>

<select>

I42

<select>

<select>

<select>

<select>

I43

<select>

<select>

<select>

<select>

I44

<select>

<select>

<select>

<select>

I45

<select>

<select>

<select>

<select>

I46

<select>

<select>

<select>

<select>

I47

<select>

<select>

<select>

<select>

I48

<select>

<select>

<select>

<select>

I49

<select>

<select>

<select>

<select>

I50

<select>

<select>

<select>

<select>

Table 1 - Types of Issues/Risks

Type

Description

Strategic

Related strategic mission and objectives.

Financial

Related
impact (costs,
revenues,Political
budgets).
Related to
to economic
legal and contractual
obligations.
or legislative impacts.

Regulatory (Compliance)
Management
Operational
Desgin & Engineering
Procurement
Fabrication
Installation

Related to decision making, resources, policies, etc.

Related to ICT delivery, support or management services.

Description

Last Update

Allocation Details/Update

Assigned To

Status

Deadline

Document Control
Date

7/7/2009

Version

Name and Position

Review type/status or amendments

Provided by KineticIT
Final version - customised
1.00 under contract to the
original Issue-Risk log template.
Dept of Finance

9/11/2013

Customised for DoF project

1.10 Updated and rebadged
management.

9/18/2013

1.20 Jack Hondros

Modified - increased issues and

risk items.

1.30 Jack Hondros

Additional content provided by

Greg Stone - Chief Technology
Officer, Microsoft Australia, Pierre
Noel - Chief Security Advisor,
Microsoft Asia and James
Kavanagh - Chief Security
Advisor, Microsoft Australia.

12/13/2013