Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
ONLINE RESOURCES
Divisin de Gentica, Centro de Investigacin Biomdica de Occidente, Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, and
2
Doctorado en Gentica Humana, Centro Universitario de Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad de Guadalajara,
Guadalajara, Jalisco 44340, Mxico
[Ros-Gonzlez B. E., Luvano-Ortega K. E., Saldaa-Cruz A. M., Gonzlez-Garca J. R. and Magaa-Torres M. T. 2011 Polymorphisms of
seven genes involved in lipid metabolism in an unselected Mexican population. J. Genet. 90, e114e119. Online only: http://www.ias.ac.in/
jgenet/OnlineResources/90/e114.pdf]
Introduction
Dyslipidemia is a multifactorial disorder caused by interactions between genetic and environmental factors. It is
characterized by hypertriglyceridemia, a low serum concentration of high density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol,
and a high serum concentration of low density lipoprotein
(LDL) cholesterol. These conditions play important roles
in the development of cardiovascular disease, hypertension,
metabolic syndrome, and atherosclerosis. Genetic variation
accounts for about 4383% of the variability of lipid levels in plasma (Chang et al. 2010). The most studied polymorphisms and/or mutations are situated in coding regions
of genes involved in lipid synthesis and degradation. Several worldwide population association studies have yielded
inconsistent results, mainly due to ethnic differences and
environmental factors (Aguilar-Salinas et al. 2009; Li et al.
2011).
Some of the single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) that
modify lipid metabolism are APOA5 p.S19W (c.56C>G),
APOB p.E4181K (c.12541G>A), APOC3 *3238G>C,
FABP2 p.A55T (c.163G>A), LDLR c.1959C>T (p.V653V),
LIPC 514C>T, and LPL p.S474X (c.1421C>G). These
genetic variations were assigned according to the nomenclature proposed by den Dunnen and Antonarakis (2001).
Diverse effects and/or associations that have been reported
with these polymorphisms are summarized in table 1. In
Mexico, some of these polymorphisms have been associated
with dyslipidemias (Keebler et al. 2009), insulin sensitivity/resistance (Goodarzi et al. 2007), and obesity and cardio-
DNA analysis
Genotyping was performed by polymerase chain reaction (PCR), PCR-articial introduction of a restriction
site (APOA5 p.S19W), by PCR-restriction fragment length
polymorphisms (PCR-RFLPs) (APOB p.E4181K, APOC3
*3238G>C, LDLR c.1959C>T and LPL p.S474X) and by
sequencing of PCR products (FABP2 and LIPC 514C>T)
using the ABI PRISM 310 sequencer. The amplified 456-bp
FABP2 fragment contains four described polymorphisms:
c.115A>G (p.A32A), p.E52D (c.156A>T), p.A55T (c.163G>
A) (reference SNP rs1799883, http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.
gov/projects/SNP/snp_ref.cgi?rs=1799883) and c.216G>A
(p.N72N) (reference SNP rs4834770, http://www.ncbi.
Keywords. lipids; linkage disequilibrium; deviation of HardyWeinberg equilibrium; Mexican population; snps.
Journal of Genetics Vol. 90, Online Resources
e114
Ref. Seq.
(rs)
Chromosome
APOA5 p.S19W
(C>G)
APOB p.E4181K
(G>A)
3135506
11q23
19W
1042031
2q24.1
4181K
APOC3 *3238G>C
FABP2 p.A55T
(G>A)
5128
1799883
11q23
4q2-q31
*3238 C
55T
LDLR c.1959C>T
5925
19p13-p13.3
1959T
LIPC 514C>T
1800588
15q21
514T
LPL p.S474X
(C>G)
328
8p22
474X
Allele
Polymorphisms were named according to the nomenclature proposed by den Dunnen and Antonarakis (2001) (http://www.hgmd.cf.ac.
uk/docs/mut_nom.html).
Allele and genotype frequencies were determined by counting. The HardyWeinberg equilibrium was calculated using
a chi-square test. The linkage disequilibrium between pairs
Primers
APOA5 p.S19W
-TaqI
APOB p.E4181K
EcoRI
APOC3 *3238G>C
SacIa
F:5- GGCTCTTCTTTCAGGTGGGTCTCCG-3
R:5- GCCTTTCCGTGCCTGGGTGGT -3
F:5- GCCATTAGGCAAATTGATGA-3
R:5- GAAACTGGAATCTGGGGAAG-3
F:5- CCAGTGAAGTTGAGAGGGTG -3
R:5- ACCCACAGAACAGCCTCG -3
F:5- TAC CGA GTT TTC TTC CCA CCC -3
R:5- TTA AAT ATC CTG CCA ATT TGT GC -3
F:5- TCT TCC TTG CTG CCT GTT TAG G -3
R:5- GGG CAG AAG AAG CGG AGT CA -3
F:5- CCT ACC TGA TTT TGC TGA GTG GC -3
R:5- TGG AAA TTC TGC CAA AGG TCG -3
F:5- ACC AGG TTA GGC TCT CAA ATT ACC C -3
R:5- GGC AAG CTG CTG GTG ATG GG -3
Polymorphism
FABP2b
LDLR c.1959C>T
LIPC 514C>T
LPL p.S474X
a Isoschizomer
AvaII
MnlI
134/23
261
188/73
501
292/209
456
296
164/132
400
394
19/33/35/59/248c
of SstI. b FABP2 sites: c.115A>G, p.E52D, p.A55T and c.216G>A. c LPL p.S474X PCR product has three constitutive cuts
(19/33/35 bp).
units of enzyme were used in all digests. F, forward primer; R, reverse primer.
d Five
e115
Results
We analysed 10 SNPs in 142 unrelated individuals;
however, not all sites could be identied in every DNA sample (table 3). All 131 individuals analysed were monomorphic for the wildtype allele at sites FABP2 c.115A>G and
p.E52D. Genotypic and allelic frequencies of the other eight
polymorphic sites are in table 3. The most common mutated
alleles were LDLR c.1959T (55.7%) and LIPC 514T
(51.6%); in contrast, the LPL p.474X allele was seen the least
(8.8%).
Table 3. Genotypic and allelic frequencies of the polymorphisms studied in the Mexican population.
Polymorphism
APOA5
p.S19W
APOB
p.E4181K
APOC3a
*3238 G>C
FABP2c
p.A55T
FABP2c
c.216G>A
LDLRb
c.1959C>T
LIPC
514C>T
LPL
p.S474X
Genotypes
(%)
n = 131
SS 84
SW 41
WW 6
64.1
31.3
4.6
n = 142
EE 102
EK 36
KK 4
71.8
25.4
2.8
n = 127
GG 92
GC 34
CC 1
72.4
26.8
0.8
n = 131
AA 73
AT 23
TT 35
55.7
17.6
26.7
n = 131
GG 45
GA 32
AA 54
34.4
24.4
41.2
n = 132
CC 29
TC 59
TT 44
22.0
44.7
33.3
n = 125
CC 24
CT 73
TT 28
19.2
58.4
22.4
n = 130
SS 109
SX 19
XX 2
83.8
14.6
1.5
Alleles
(%)
n = 262
S 209
W 53
79.8
20.2
n = 284
E 240
K 44
84.5
15.5
n = 254
G 218
C 36
85.8
14.2
n = 262
A 169
T 93
64.5
35.5
n = 262
G 122
A 140
46.6
53.4
n = 264
C 117
T 147
44.3
55.7
n = 250
C 121
T 129
48.4
51.6
n = 260
S 237
X 23
91.2
8.8
All individuals (n = 131) were monomorphics for the wildtype allele at sites FABP2 c.115A>G and p.E52D.
Usually named a SstI and b AvaII. c Departure from the HardyWeinberg equilibrium.
Journal of Genetics Vol. 90, Online Resources
e116
Discussion
In different populations, the alleles APOA5 p.19W, APOC3
*3238C, LIPC 514T and FABP2 p.55T have been associated with high levels of cholesterol, HDL and/or triglycerides
in plasma (Deeb and Peng 2000; Liu et al. 2005; Albala et al.
2006; Smith et al. 2010). These alleles were frequent and
were seen at a range of 1452% in our population. Further,
mutant alleles APOB p. 4181K (15%), LDLR c.1959T(56%),
and LPL p.474X (9%), which have opposite effects on lipid
concentrations (Genest et al. 1990; Liu et al. 2003; Rip et al.
2006; Benn et al. 2008) from the above-mentioned alleles, also appear at high frequencies. These results reveal the
importance of integrating results from studies on multiple
polymorphisms and/or mutations with potential roles in the
development of dyslipidemia. Because some of these variants have opposite effects on the regulation of lipid levels in
plasma, analysis of singular polymorphisms could generate
ambiguous results.
The FABP2 p.A55T (alanine>threonine) site frequently
exhibits a G>A change; however, in some populations the C
and T variants, rendering proline and serine changes, respectively, have also been observed (Reference SNP rs1799883,
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/projects/SNP/snp_ref.cgi? rs=
1799883). The Mexican population harboured only the G>A
change where the ancestral G allele was the most common
(66.1%).
Linkage disequilibrium analyses are useful in establishing the genetic basis of multifactorial diseases or complex
traits. Our unselected population showed linkage disequilibrium between FABP2 p.A55T and c.216 G>A, perhaps as a
result of the small number of nucleotides between them.
Evaluating HWE among alleles is a basic approach in
most population genetics studies. We detected a signicant
departure from HWE for the polymorphisms FABP2 p.A55T
and c.216G>A, where heterozygotes were under-represented
and mutant homozygotes were in excess. These deviations
are often interpreted as genotyping errors; however, we can
exclude this possibility at least for site p.A55T because it
was identied by two different methodologies (sequencing
and RFLPs), and in both instances the same results were
obtained. Other causes of departure from HWE are nonrandom mating, recent migrations, mixture of subpopulations with incomplete interbreeding, and selection. The rst
three causes can be dismissed because other polymorphisms
(at least 13) were analysed in the same population (mainly
from two different states: Jalisco and Michoacan) and all
were at HWE (Luvano et al. 2009). It is noteworthy that
a report in obese Mexican population also shows signicant
departure from HWE for FABP2 p.A55T site (P = 0.02)
(Martnez-Lpez et al. 2007). Thereby, we can suggest that
in our population these polymorphisms represent underdominant selection, where the new alleles reduce the tness of
the heterozygote alone (Jobling et al. 2004).
On the other hand, the GG haplotype (121 versus 190
45) was under-represented in the haplotype distributions of
the FABP2 p.A55T (G>A) and c.216G>A sites analysed by
the EwensWatterson homozygosity test. In contrast, the AA
(92 versus 51 34) and the GA (48 versus 15 16) haplotypes were over-represented in the sample. According to
the values proposed by Watterson (1978), F value was statistically signicant (0.08); which indicates that the FABP2
polymorphisms signicantly deviate, with an excess of heterozygosity, from the expectations of the standard neutral
model. These results suggest the presence of a type of
gene-specic selective force.
e117
CEU
CHB
JPT
YRI
MEX-A
APOA5
p.S19W
SS
SW
WW
n = 60
53
7
P < 0.01
%
88.3
11.7
n = 45
45
P < 0.01
%
100
n = 45
45
P < 0.01
%
100
n = 60
55
4
1
P < 0.01
%
91.6
6.7
1.7
APOB
p.E4181K
EE
EK
KK
n = 60
40
15
5
P = 0.19
%
66.7
25
8.3
n = 45
41
4
P < 0.01
%
91.1
8.9
n = 44
42
2
P < 0.01
%
95.5
4.5
n = 60
44
11
5
P = 0.66
APOC3
*3238
G>C
GG
GC
CC
n = 113
94
18
1
P = 0.09
%
83.2
15.9
0.9
n = 43
13
25
5
P < 0.01
%
30.2
58.2
11.6
n = 85
29
47
9
P < 0.01
%
34.1
55.3
10.6
FABP2
p.A55T
AA
AT
TT
n = 113
47
58
8
P = 0.57
%
41.6
51.3
7.1
n = 41
16
23
2
P = 0.70
%
39.0
56.1
4.9
n = 84
37
40
7
P = 0.53
%
44.0
47.7
8.3
FABP2
c.216
G>A
GG
GA
AA
n = 113
27
60
26
P = 0.41
%
23.9
53.1
23.0
n = 42
14
22
6
P = 0.05
%
33.3
52.4
14.3
n = 84
26
46
12
P = 0.02
%
31.0
54.8
14.3
LDLR
c.1959
C>T
CC
CT
TT
n = 60
20
25
15
P = 0.08
%
55.5
41.7
25.0
n = 44
27
14
3
P < 0.01
%
61.4
31.8
6.8
n = 45
28
17
P < 0.01
%
62.2
37.8
LIPC
514
C>T
CC
CT
TT
n = 60
34
21
5
P < 0.01
%
56.7
35.0
8.3
n = 45
16
23
6
P = 0.08
%
35.6
51.1
13.3
n = 44
7
22
15
P = 0.32
LPL
p.S474X
SS
SX
XX
n = 60
46
13
1
P = 0.48
%
76.7
21.7
1.7
n = 45
37
8
P = 0.82
%
82.2
17.8
n = 44
32
11
1
P = 0.18
%
73.3
18.3
8.3
n = 50
33
16
1
P = 0.64
%
66.0
32.0
2.0
n = 113
70
37
6
P = 0.04
%
62.0
32.7
5.3
n = 50
34
14
2
P = 0.41
%
68.0
28.0
4.0
n = 49
25
19
5
P = 0.32
%
51.0
38.8
10.2
n = 113
33
58
22
P = 0.07
%
29.2
51.3
19.5
n = 49
14
28
7
P = 0.07
%
28.6
57.1
14.3
n = 50
16
24
10
P = 0.06
%
32.0
48.0
20.0
%
15.9
50.0
34.1
n = 60
12
32
16
P = 0.74
%
20.0
53.3
26.7
%
72.7
25.0
2.3
n = 60
56
4
P = 0.22
%
93.3
6.7
P = P values obtained by comparing our frequencies versus the frequencies from other populations. CEU, European, CHB, Chinese, JPT,
Japanese; YRI, Nigerian populations (International Hap Map Consortium 2003, http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/projects/SNP/snp_ref.cgi?
rs = 328, rs = 5925, rs = 1800588, 1799883, 1800775, 4783962, 5128, 1042031, 3135506).
References
Aguilar-Salinas C. A., Canizales-Quinteros S., Rojas-Martnez R.,
Mehta R., Villarreal-Molina M. T., Arellano-Campos O. et al.
2009 Hypoalphalipoproteinemia in populations of Native American ancestry: an opportunity to assess the interaction of genes
and the environment. Curr. Opin. Lipidol. 20, 9297.
Albala B. C., Jimnez R. B., Prez B. F. and Liberman G. C. 2006
Fatty acid binding protein 2 (FABP-2) polymorphism, obesity
and insulin resistance. Rev. Md. Chile 134, 372379.
Baier L. J., Bogardus C. and Sacchettini J. C. 1996 A polymorphism
in the human intestinal fatty acid binding protein alters fatty acid
transport across Caco-2 cells. J. Biol. Chem. 271, 1089210896.
Benn M., Stene M. C., Nordestgaard B. G., Jensen G. B.,
Steffensen R. and Tybjaerg-Hansen A. 2008 Common and rare
alleles in apolipoprotein B contribute to plasma levels of lowdensity lipoprotein cholesterol in the general population. J. Clin.
Endocrinol. Metab. 93, 10381045.
e118
Received 6 June 2011, in nal revised form 22 August 2011; accepted 13 September 2011
Published on the Web: 16 December 2011
e119