Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
2- Employee-based techniques
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
I
J
K
L
M
N
O
P
Q
R
S
T
U
3- Product-based techniques
A
B
C
D
E
Value engineering
Product diversification
Product simplification
Research and development
Product standardization
Method engineering
Work measurement
Job design
Job evaluation
Job safety design
Human factors engineering (Ergonomics)
Production scheduling
Computer-aided data processing
Inventory control
Material requirement planning (MRP)
Materials management
Quality control
Material handling system improvement
Material reuse and recycling
Data collection
Computation of total
productivity changes and
Regression analysis to
determine productivity
improvement coefficient
No
Yes
Productivity improvement
coefficient>0
Investigation of
the
effectiveness
techniques with
negative
coefficient
Selection of
candidate techniques
for productivity
improvement
Integer
programming
formulation
Sensitivity
analysis
Final technique
selection
Implementation
Data collection. A two page survey questionnaire is used to collect two type of information from an
organization:
1-Total sales and total expenses for several time periods in the past (the time period can be months,
quarters, half-years, years, etc ).These are used as estimates of total output and total input, respectively.
2-Productivity improvement techniques used in the corresponding time periods (the 54 techniques
listed above are used as a guideline).
The first type of information comes readily from the financial statements, while the second type
of information is available from industrial engineering of operations departments.
Computation of productivity changes and data file compilation. The next step is to calculate the
percentage change in total productivity between consecutive time periods t and t-1:
Pct =
TP tTPt 1
100
TPt 1
Pct =Percent changetotal productivity between t1t
Where
TPt =
(total output )t
(total input )t
TP t1=
( total output ) t1
( total input ) t1
The total output and total input are expressed in constant dollars with respect to a base
period.
A data file structure is then prepared, showing the percent change in total productivity
improvement and the technique of productivity improvement used in the various time periods. We
denote the kth technique by
PC t as follows.
PC t =A 0 t + A 1t T 1 t + A2 t T 2t + + A kt T kt + + A 54 t
A frequency distribution of the usage of the techniques for different periods is also prepared in
order to indicate the consistency with which some of these techniques yielding positive productivity
changes.
The techniques that are associated with positive coefficients are selected as a preliminary set; we
shall call these the candidate techniques.
Ak T k
k=1
Subject to
r
f k Tk F
k=1
sk T k S
k=1
T k =0,1
Where
T k = 1 if technique k is selected
0 otherwise
companies manufacturing
Automotive parts
companies manufacturing
companies manufacturing
Aircraft
companies manufacturing
Knitwear
companies manufacturing
Food items
Data Collection-The data for total sales and total expenses, and the usage of various techniques of
productivity improvement, were collected from a two-page questionnaire sent to the 10 companies.
Computation of Productivity Changes and Data File Compilation: The total productivity value
were computed for 10 six-month periods. The percent change in total productivity from one period to
the next was then calculated and a data structure was established.
Determination of productivity improvement coefficients. A multiple regression analysis was
performed using the multiple regression subroutine of the SPSS program on UNIVAC 1100/8 system.
Productivity improvement coefficient based on data from 10 companies for 10 six month
period
Technique No
Technique name
productivity improvement
Coefficient (%)
T24
communication
+98.16
T12
energy conservation
+48.51
T46
production scheduling
+22.78
T43
job evaluation
T13
+13.39
+6.42
T16
employee promotions
T51
quality control
-34.97
T48
inventory control
-49.58
T26
-1.72
training
T47
-54.04
-60.04
Constant term
12.1956
CAD
CAM
Integrate CAM
Robotics
Laser-beam technique
Energy technique
Group technique
Computer graphics
Emulation
Maintenance management
Rebuilding old machinery
Energy conservation
Individual financial incentives
Group financial incentives
Fringe benefits
Employee promotions
Job enrichment
Job enlargement
7
2
3
1
2
1
2
2
2
2
5
5
5
2
0
6
6
2
1
8
2
3
1
2
1
2
2
2
2
5
5
6
2
0
6
6
2
1
9
4
4
2
2
2
3
2
3
2
6
5
7
3
0
6
7
2
1
10
4
5
2
2
2
3
2
3
2
6
5
7
3
0
6
7
2
1
T19
T20
T21
T22
T23
T24
T25
T26
T27
T28
T29
T30
T31
T32
T33
T34
T35
T36
T37
T38
T39
T40
T41
T42
T43
T44
T45
T46
T47
T48
T49
T50
T51
T52
T53
T54
Job rotation
Worker participation
Increasing worker skills
Management by objectives
Learning curves
Communication
Better working condition
Training
Education
Role perception
Quality of supervision
Recognition
Quality circle
Punishment
Zero defects
Value engineering
Product diversification
Product simplification
R&D
Product standardization
Product reliability improvement
Method engineering
Work measurement
Job design
Job evaluation
Job safety design
Human factors engineering
Production scheduling
Advertising and promotions
Inventory control
Material requirement
Planning(MRP)
Materials management
Quality control
Quality handling system
Design
Recycling materials
Computer-aided data
Processing
1
2
3
2
4
5
3
5
3
0
3
3
0
4
2
3
3
3
5
3
3
3
3
2
4
3
2
6
4
4
1
2
3
2
4
5
3
5
3
0
3
4
1
4
1
3
3
3
5
3
3
3
3
2
4
3
2
6
4
4
1
2
3
3
3
5
4
5
3
0
3
4
1
4
1
3
3
3
5
3
4
3
3
2
4
3
2
6
4
4
2
2
4
4
3
5
4
5
3
0
3
4
4
4
1
3
3
3
5
3
4
3
3
2
4
3
3
6
4
4
1
2
4
4
3
5
4
5
3
0
4
4
1
4
2
3
2
3
5
3
4
3
3
2
5
3
3
6
4
4
2
2
5
5
3
5
4
6
4
0
4
4
1
4
2
3
3
4
5
3
4
3
3
2
5
4
3
6
4
5
3
3
6
5
3
5
5
7
5
0
5
4
2
4
1
4
3
4
5
4
5
4
4
2
6
4
4
7
4
6
3
3
5
5
3
5
5
7
5
0
5
4
3
4
1
4
3
4
5
4
5
4
4
2
6
4
4
7
4
6
3
4
6
6
5
6
6
8
5
0
5
5
3
4
1
4
4
4
5
6
6
5
5
2
7
4
5
8
4
6
3
4
6
6
5
6
6
8
5
1
5
5
5
4
1
4
4
4
5
6
6
5
5
2
7
4
5
8
5
6
1
1
7
1
1
7
2
1
7
2
1
7
2
1
7
2
1
7
3
2
7
3
2
8
3
4
9
5
4
9
2
3
2
3
2
3
2
3
3
3
3
3
4
3
4
3
4
3
4
3
Final selection of the productivity improvement technique. For each of the candidate techniques
identified in the previous step, let us suppose that the director of productivity management in the
corporate headquarters has his or her people compile the information based on the questionnaire filled
out by each of the ten companies.
Production scheduling
Communication
Job evaluation
Energy conservation
Individual financial
Incentives
Average
installation
time(Mos)
Average
payback
period
Average annual
savings attributable
the technique
(Mos)
(Millions
22.79
98.16
13.39
48.51
6
12
1
12
6
12
3
6
0.30
0.35
0.05
1.50
6.42
12
1.00
$ )
It is not realistic to expect each of the companies to employ all the 54 techniques of productivity
improvement; therefore, what we have done here is to come up with a set of techniques that have been
proved successful in one or more of the ten companies.
The formulation for final selection of the productivity improvement techniques from among the
candidate techniques is given by the following:
Maximize:
Subject to:
for k =1,2,3,4,5
This model was solved by using the Mixed Integer Programming (MIP) subroutine of the
FMPS program on the UNIVAC 1100/8 computer.
The CPU time was 0.016 minutes, and the solution obtained was
1-microprocessor principle
Whenever and wherever possible design products and
processes with microprocessor control .The use of
microprocessor creates built-in productivity and quality
that may not be ordinary achieved unless formal effort are
made once the product or process are designed
200
400
50
3.00
2.5oo
1.00
0 100
4-Secrecy principle
Productivity improvement strategies that are novel when
compare to the competitor must be kept secret
European and asian companies tend to be more
conscious of the secrecy principle than are united states
companies
Nondefense organization do not have to give away their
importance to productivity improvement strategy simply
because they do not produce any product that are
classified top secret
6-Emulation principle
9-Harmony principle
Seek harmony in human relations at all level of
management from the topmost executive down to the
productions/operations level employee
It is the most effective one for short and long term
productivity improvement principle, it is also very difficult
principle to practice. internal politics in an organization
result from a lack in harmony between the goals and
objectives of the management ,the employee and the
union.
Whenever a union exists in an organization sincere effort
must be made to work with it
Harmony can not be taught through few training session
,seminars and workshops .it can be learned simply by
reading about human relations