Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Recently, rice straw has been applied back in larger amounts onto paddy and also
upland fields, especially for green house croppings, as an organic material mainly for
soil improvement. The degradation products of rice straw in the soils may influence
the growth of crops in both nutritional and physiological aspects. The elucidation of
the mechanism of humus formation from rice straw is also of importance for understanding its influence on plant growth.
Phenolic substances are widely distributed in various plants, including the rice
plant. Some of the substances, which enter into soils from the plants, cause dieback
219
220
disease or other abnormal growth as inhibitors against plant growth. It was reported
that p-coumaric acid and other phenolics, for instance, inhibited the growth of the
upland rice plant (1 ), pea ( 2 ), and sugarcan.;: ( 3 ), and that isoflavones caused the
abnormal growth of red clover ( 4 ). Moreover, phenolic moieties are included in the
chemical structure of humic acids ( 5, 6 ).
NORD ( 7) found phenolic compounds such as ferulic acid, vanillic acid, dehydrodivanillin, and vanillin in the products from lignin which had been degraded by white
rot fungi. WHITEHEAD ( 8) detected phenolic compounds such as p-hydroxybenzoic,
vanillic, p-coumaric, and ferulic acids from soils. WANG, et al. ( 9) also found phenolic
acids in some Taiwan soils in which the yield of sugarcane decreased after multiple
planting. On the other hand, KUWATSUKA and OSHIMA ( 10) isolated and/or identified
p-hydroxybenzoic, vanillic, p-coumaric, and ferulic acids from rice leaves. INAMATSU
( 11 ) also found P-coumaric acid in a methanol extract of rice straw and recognized
that the amount of the acid decreased during the heaping of rice straw.
Most of these reports are deficient in quantitative data for these phenolic substances. Further quantitative information is necessary to elucidate the behavior of
phenolic substances in the decaying process of rice straw in soils and in compost.
In this paper, phenolic acids in rice straw and its decayed product were surveyed
in more detail and quantitatively analysed by gas chromatography.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Rice straw of the "Kinmaze" variety was air-dried and crushed by a 'Wiley's
crusher so as to pass through a 2 rom sieve. For the preparation of the decayed
product, the crushed straw was put in beakers, brought to 60% water content, covered
with Saran Wrap, and incubated at 50oc for 45 days. The samples were mixed well
once a week.
Phenolic aldehydes and acids were obtained commercially, including p-hydroxybenzaldehyde, vanillin, resorcinol, orcinol, p-coumaric acid, ferulic acid, syringic acid,
protocatechuic acid, .S-resorcylic acid, caffeic acid, sinapic add, gallic acid, gentisic
acid, p-hydroxybenzoic acid, benzoic acid, vanillic acid, and salicylic acid.
Gas chromatography was carried out on a Hitachi Gas Chromatograph Model 063
equipped with a flame ionization detector, and dual stainless columns, 2 mx3 rom (inner
diameter), packed with chromosorb W (60-80 mesh) coated with 1.5% Silicone SE 30
(Shimazu). The flow rate of the carrier gas (nitrogen) was 30 ml/min. The temperatures of injector and detector were 280 and 300C, respectively. The column temperature was programmed from 100 to 250C at 5C/min. For standard calibration curves,
the ratio of the peak height of phenolic acid to that of the internal standard substance,
p-chlorobenzoic acid, was plotted to the ratio of the amount of the former to a definite
amount of the latter.
Identification of phenolic acids in rice straw and its decayed product.
Fifteen grams
each of the crushed rice straw sample or the decayec\. product was suspended in 1 liter
of methanolic sodium hydroxide (methanol : 0.1 N Na0H=7 : 3) and shaken for 30 min.
The extract solution was centrifuged and then filtered. The filtrate was adjusted to
pH 7.Q-7.5 with dil. HCI, concentrated to about 300 ml at 45-50C in a water bath.
and acidified to pH<2 with dil. HCl. The solution was extracted with 300m! of ether
221
three times. The ether was dried over anhydrous Na 2SO., and evaporated to dryness
below 45C. To the residual sample was added 0.3 ml of TMS (N, 0-bis-trimethylsilyl
acetamide, 25% solution in acetonitrile), and the solution was allowed to stand for 3
min in heat below 60C and was then injected into the gas chromatograph. The individual phenolic compounds in rice straw and the decayed product were identified with
the authentic chemicals by co-chromatography,
Recovery test 1 (Recovery from methanolic NaOll solution).
Phenolic acids of the
various concentrations shown in Table 2 were added to 100 ml of the methanolic sodium
hydroxide above described. The solution was adjusted to pH 7.0-7.5 with dil. HCl,
evaporated to 30 ml at 45-50C in a water bath and acidified to pH <2 with dil. HCI.
'The phenolic acids were extracted with 100 ml of ether four times. The ether solutions
were combined, dried with anhydrous sodium sulfate, and then concentrated to a small
volume. The materials were completely transferred to a small vial with washing
acetone. P-Chlorobenzoic acid as the internal standard substance was added into the
vial and the solvent was evaporated off below 60C. The sample with added 100 pl of
'TMS solution was allowed to stand for 3 min in heat below 60C and injected into
the gas chromatograph. From the ratio of the peak heights of the samples to that of
the internal standard substance, the amount of each phenolic acid was obtained by the
standard calibration curves which had been previously prepared for the determination
of the amount of phenolic acids.
Recovery test 2 (Recovery from the rice straw with added authentic chemicals).
The
-crushed straw was extracted with acetone and methanolic sodium hydroxide successively, and then the residue was washed and air-dried. To 5 g of the residue, 15 ml for a
wet condition or 50 ml for a flooded condition of distilled water and 5 to 10 ml of a
methanol solution of phenol carboxylic acids of the various amounts shown in Table 3
were added and allowed to stand for 30 min at room temperature. After the addition
of 150 ml of the methanolic sodium hydroxide solution, each sample was shaken for 30
min. The suspension was centrifuged at 3,000 rpm for 30 min and filtered. This
procedure was repeated three times. The filtrates were combined and made up to 500
ml. The subsequent procedure was as described above (Recovery test 1). Moreover,
as the blank test, phenolic acids in the straw sample with no authentic chemicals added
were also determined by the same procedure. The recovery of phenolic acids was cal-culated by the following formula:
Recovery (%) =
B-C
--x-
100
where A is the added amount of phenolic acids, B the recovered amount from the
straw sample with the added acids, and C the recovered amount from the sample
without added acids.
Determination of major phenolic acid components in rice straw and the decayed straw.
Each content of major phenolic acids in 5 g of the straw sample was determined by
applying the procedure of "Recovery test 2" before and after the incubation at sooc for
45 days under the wet condition.
Determination of the total phenolic substances in the ether-extractable acid fraction
.()f rice straw and in that of the decayed product.
Total phenolic substances in the
222
ether-soluble acid fractions derived from the concentrated methanol-NaOH extracts, described in "Recovery test 2" were also determined by a modification of the method of
Folin et al. ( 12 ). After the ether solution was dried up, 50 ml of 20% Na2C08 and
10 ml of Folin's reagent were added to the residue. The mixture was filled up to 100
ml with distiUed water and allowed to stand for 20 min at room temperature and the
optical density was measured at 700 mp. The amount of phenolic substance was calculated from the optical density of p-coumaric acid, which was present in the largest
amount of the phenolic acids in rice straw.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Phenolic acids in rice straw and the decayed product were surveyed by the gas
chromatographic method as described above. As a result, nine phenolic acids were
newly detected by co-chromatography with authentic chemicals in addition to P..hydroxybenzoic, vanillic, p..coumaric, and ferulic acids which had been already identified as
phenolics in rice plants ( 10 ).
The gas chromatogram of phenolic acids in rice straw is shown in Fig. 1. The
100
14
..
"'
..,2.
11
so
!:E:
10
20
Retention time
6n in)
30
40
223
Phenolic acid
Benzoic
Salicylic
P.Hydroxybenzoic
Vanillic
2
3
13
Gentisic
Protocatechuic
JlResorcylic
Syringic
p-coumaric
Gallic
Ferulic
Caffeic
Sinapic
14
p-el-benzoic
()
1
8
9
10
11
12
Chemical structure
Benzoic acid
2-Hydroxybenzoic acid
4-Hydroxybenzoic acid
3-Methoxy-4-hydroxybenzoic acid
2, 5-Dihydroxybenzoic acid
3, 4Dihydroxybenzoic acid
2, 4-Dihydroxybenzoic acid
3, 5-Dimethoxy-4-hydroxybenzoic acid
4Hydroxycinnamic acid
3, 4, STrihydroxybenzoic acid
3-Methoxy-4-hydroxycinnamic acid
3, 4-Dihydroxycinnamic add
3, 5Dimethoxy-4-hydroxycinnamic acid
Internal standard substance
4..Chlorobenzoic acid
Relative reten
tion time
0.67
1.26
1.59
1. 91
2.00
2.05
2.05
2.15
2.30
2.34
2.61
2.66
2.90
1.00
method was used for the gas chromatography, p..Chlorobenzoic acid was used as the
internal standard substance because the peak did not interfere with compounds derived
from rice straw and its decayed product.
Standard calibration curves of major phenolic acids are shown in Fig. 2, in which
the linear relation is shown between the ratio of the peak height and that of the
.amount. Recovery of individual phenolic acid in "Recovery test 1" is shown in Table
2 and the average of recoveries were as follows: P..hydroxybenzoic acid 97%, vanillic
.acid 99%, p-coumaric acid 87%, ferulic acid 68%, salicylic acid 99.5%, and syringic
.acid 81%, respectively. Each recovery of these acids showed almost the same value
for the various concentrations of phenolic acids added. The recovery of ferulic acid
was lower than those of the other phenolic acids, It seemed to be caused by the
structural change of the acid during the procedure and/or by the long retention time,
Recovery of individual phenolic acids in "Recovery test 2.. is shown in Table 3.
Both recoveries by "test 1" and "test 2" were almost same. This means that the
:Phenolic acids added were mostly recovered from the straw sample by extraction three
times with methanolic sodium hydroxide. The outline of quantitative determination is
shown in Fig. 3. The determined values of phenolic acids in rice straw and the decayed
product were as follows: p-coumaric acid 0.037%, 0.017%, ferulic acid 0.022%, 0.013%,
vanillic acid 0.012%, 0.009%, and P..hydroxybenzoic acid 0.002%, 0.002%, per dry weight,
respectively (Table 4). The content of p-coumaric acid was the largest of all phenolic
acids. The amount of other phenolic acids, except for p.hydroxybenzoic acid, decreased
during the decaying process of the straw, These amounts of individual acids and the
224
.g
""."'
Ill
""!!c:
...f
Ill
.::::
1.6
1.4
1.2
1.0
} 0.8
"'
.:&, 0.6
......o;
:
... 0.4
0
0.2
0o
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
1,.2
1.<&
Ratio of amount (sample/internal standard sub.)
Vanillic
p-Coumaric
Ferulic
Salicylic
Syringic
Added amount
(pg)
Recovered amount
(pg)
Recovery
(%)
382
153
377
144
99
76
75
406
406
98
100
162
155
96
81
338
81
100
304
90
135
118
68
57
87
84
364
258
146
98
71
67
73
48
66
402
402
100
161
159
99
412
346
84
165
127
77
94
Average;of recovery
(%}
97
99
87
68
99,5
81
225
Condition 1>
Added
amount
(pg)
Blank
(no addition)
(pg)
Recovered
amount
Recovery
(%)
Average of
recovery
(%)
p-Hydroxybenzoic
804
Trace
737
92
91
804
724
90
784
876
93
520
95
392
508
92
796
2696
93
2303
88
398
2326
94
776
1431
1158
70
70
1144
66
555
74
529
71
792
97
790
97
388
95
Salicylic
w
w
F
p-Coumaric
w
w
F
w
w
Ferulic
F
Syringic
Vanillic
1)
392
147
1952
398
888
388
388
Trace
748
748
816
816
408
+2>
2)
(pg)
93
92
69
73
96
+, <50pg.
Table 4. Content of phenolic substances in rice straw and the decayed product.
Decayed product
Rice straw
Phenolic substance
Content
(pg)
%per
dry wt.
Content
(pg)
1642
0.037
446
27.2
0.017
Ferulic acid
981
0.022
340
34.6
0.013
Vanillic acid
543
0.012
240
44.2
0.009
79
0.002
63
79.7
0.002
Salicylic acid
<SO
<0.002
<SO
Syringic acid
<SO
<0.002
<SO
5.7 mg
p-Coumaric acid
p-Hydroxybenzoic acid
1S.1 mg
0.34
<0.002
<0.002
37.7
0.28
226
alkaline methanol
shake for 30 min
Filter
Fill up to 500 ml
Concentrate
Residual fraction
Concentrate
Dry up
Na2COa
Folin reagent
distilled water
Evaporate off
TMS
Gas chromatography
Fig. 3. The outline of the quantitative determination.
only 21 and 19% of the whole amounts of ether-soluble phenolic substances which were
calculated as p-coumaric acid, in non-decayed straw and the decayed product, respectively. This result suggests that either rice straw or the decayed product contains
many other phenolics besides these 4 major phenolic acids, as is shown by the gas
chromatogram in Fig. 1. These percentages also suggest that the ether-soluble acid
fraction contains other types of phenolic compounds such as tricin, an ether-soluble
flavonoid compound, which had been isolated from rice leaves (13), and these compounds were not detected by this gas chromatographic method. Further, the ratio of
the summed amounts of the major phenolic acids to the amount of the total phenolic
227
substances in the ether-extracted fraction was only slightly changed, although both
amounts decreased to about one-third of the initial amounts after the incubation of
straw for 45 days. This result may suggest that considerable amounts of various
ether-extractable phenolics in rice straw behaved in a similar manner during the in
cubation, although these phenolics were thought to be decomposed or polymerized to
other molecules and produced from substances of higher molecular weight during this
decaying process. And, it may be said that the decomposition or polymerization of
these phenolics of low molecular weight was more rapid than their production from
other ether-unextractable substances such as lignin.
Acknowledgement. Special thanks are due to Prof. K. Kumada of the authors' laboratory for
his guidance and assistance during the course of this study.
REFERENCES
1)
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
7)
8)
9)
10)
11)
12)
13)