Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Amir Vig
In PDE, we will study (second order) equations of the form F (u, Du, D2 u, x) = 0. Here F :
2
R Rn Rn Rn R is a function that depends on the function u, gradient
u
x1
u
x1
Du = u = .
..
(1)
u
x1
D 2 u = 2 u =
2u
x1 x1
..
.
2u
xn x1
...
..
.
...
2u
x1 xn
..
.
2u
xn xn
(2)
Ok, so now we need to clarify some things: Suppose we have a function u(x, t) that takes in
one space variable x and one time variable t. It is really important to understand what do we mean
by expressions like ux (x, t) or ut (x, t). Here, x and t show up in two places... once as a subscript
and once as a variable the function u takes in. Are they the same? The answer is NO! ux simply
means the derivative of u with respect to the first variable... having nothing to do with where the
function is being evaluated. For example, you could have uxt (y, t + s + h) which is the derivative of
u in the first variable and then the second variable, evaluated at the point (y, t + s + h). Oftentimes,
people get confused by using the same letter for the variable which we differentiate with respect
to and the variable that u takes in... but they are different. However, when we do use the same
letter, ux (x, t) is the function u differentiated with respect to the first variable, evaluated at the
point (x, t). The x in the subscript is just indicating where the derivative is being taken, not where
this new function is being evaluated. Hopefully this is clear... Now, some more concrete things.
Chain Rule: Suppose u : Rn R is a function of m variables x1 , . . . , xm which takes values
in R. Now suppose f1 , . . . , fm : Rn R are m different functions which take in x = (x1 , . . . , xn ).
f1 (x1 , . . . , xn )
..
f (x) =
(3)
fm (x1 , . . . , xn )
with m components. Hence, it makes sense to consider the composition u(f (x)). Note that u f :
Rn Rm R. So the composition takes in n variables and outputs a single number. The chain
rule from calculus tells us that
D(u f ) = Du Df = DuDf
(f1 )x
. 1
= ((u f )x1 , . . . , (u f )xn ) = ux1 . . . uxm ..
(4)
...
..
.
...
(fm )x1
(f1 )xn
..
.
(5)
(fm )xn
Usually for us, we want to understand something like x1 u f (x), which is the first entry of the
above vector (when you multiply the matrices, you end up with a row vector). Taking the matrix
product and equating components of the above vectors gives
n
X
x1 (u f )(x) =
(6)
You can obviously replace x1 with any one of the other xj . Lets see an example. Suppose u : R3
R be given by u(f1 , f2 , f3 ) = f1 + f25 + f37 . Let f1 (x, y) = x3 , f2 (x, y) = xy 2 and f3 (x, y) = sin(x2 y).
Here m = 3 and n = 2. Then we have
u f1
u f2
u f3
+
+
f1 x
f2 x
f3 x
= 1 3x2 + 5f24 (x, y) y 2 + 7f36 (x, y) 2x cos(x2 y)
2 4
(7)
(8)
(9)
We will use this quite a bit, so try to make sure you understand it.
Improper Integrals Suppose we have an arbitrary function u : R R which depends on x.
Suppose u is continuous... then the FTOC guarantees the existence of an antiderivative by the
formula
Z x
F (x) =
u(t) dt
(10)
0
x3
G(x) =
u(t) dt
(11)
x2
How do we differentiate G in x? Well, an easy way to think about this is in terms of the FTOC...
We dont need to know what the antiderivative F is explicitly, but we can use the fact that it exists
2
= u(x ) 3x u(x) 2x
(12)
(13)
where we used the one variable chain rule in the first line. The general formula is easily obtained
from this
Z b(x)
u(t) dt = u(a(x)) a0 (x) u(b(x)) b0 (x)
(14)
a(x)
We will use this quite a bit as well. For example today, we used the mass conservation law
Z
M = const. =
b+ch
u(x, t) dx =
0
u(x, t + h) dx
(15)
ch
(16)
(17)
Setting h = 0 gives the PDE cux (b, t) + ut (b, t) = 0. Notice that we used the letter b here, but b
could be any point (so we might as well call it x)... Recall x in the subscript ux has nothing to do
with either b or the actual input x!!! The PDE is more compactly written as cux + ut = 0.