Vous êtes sur la page 1sur 3

Some Interesting Statements By Scientists:

(only one is by a biblical creationist)


(Note: Reference numbers refer to the Bibliography. The first number indicates the book or publication, the
second number(s) refers to the pages referenced.)

1. Christian B. Anfinsen, (Ph.D. biochemistry, Harvard University, Nobel prize for physics)
I think only an idiot can be an atheist. 22:139
2. David Berlinsky (Ph.D. mathematics, Princeton University)
The theory of evolution is the great white elephant of contemporary thought. It is large,
almost entirely useless, and the object of superstitious awe.27
3. Michael Denton (M.D., molecular biologist)
Ultimately, the Darwinian theory of evolution is no more or less than the great cosmogenic
myth of the 20th century.
The overriding supremacy of the myth has created a widespread illusion that the theory of
evolution was all but proved 100 years ago and that all subsequent biological research
paleontological, zoological and in the new branches of genetics and molecular biologyhas
provided ever increasing evidence for Darwinian ideas. Nothing could be further from the
truth.9: 77,358
4. Isaac V. Manly, (M.D., Harvard Medical School)
[Evolution] is a fairy tale myth.
Society has suffered as a result of this adult fantasy.
Evolutionists claim their theory is scientific. Where is the science? I can assure the reader
the American Kennel Club would not certify an ancestor of your dog based on evidence such
as paleontologists present. 29:15,117,228
5. Saltationist Sren Lvtrup, Professor of Embryology, University of Umea, Sweden
I believe that one day the Darwinian [gradualist] myth will be ranked the greatest deceit in
the history of science. When this happens, many people will pose the question: how did this
ever happen? 28:422
6. H.S. Lipson, University of Manchester Institute of Science and Technology
to my mind, the theory does not stand up at all.I think, however, that we must go further
than this and admit that the only acceptable explanation is creation. I know that this is
anathema to physicists, as indeed it is to me, but we must not rejected a theory that we do not
like if the experimental evidence supports it. (Physics Bulletin, May 1980, p.138)
7. Lemoine, former President of the Geological Society of France, Director of the Natural History
Museum in Paris, editor of the Encyclopedia Francaise
the theory of evolution is impossible. 5 vol.1:151
8. Ken Hsu, Geological Institute at Zurich, former President of the International Association of

Sedimentologists
We have had enough of the Darwinian fallacy. Its about time we cry the emperor has no
clothes. (Darwins Three Mistakes Geology, Vol. 14 (1986) p. 534
9. Louis Neel, Nobel Prize for physics
the progress of science, no matter how marvelous it appears to be, does not bring
science closer to religion but it leads to dead ends and shows our final ineptitude at
producing a rational explanation of the universe.22:73
10. Arno Penzias, Nobel Prize for physics
Creation is supported by all the data so far.22:83
11. Thomas C. Emmel, Ph.D. in Population Biology, Stanford University, Professor of Zoology,
University of Florida, Gainesville
To me, the concept of God is a logical outcome of the study of the immense universe that
lies around us. the evidence is all too pervasive for me to think otherwise.22:171
12. P.C.C. Garnham, M.D., D.Sc., recipient of the Darling Medal and Prize, Emeritus Professor of
Medical Protozoology, University of London
by faith and by appreciation of scientific necessity, God must exist.22:173
13. Dr. A.E. Wilder-Smith, holder of three earned doctorates in science
the theory totally lacks experimental or theoretical scientific basis!
this type of [evolutionary establishment] credulousness far surpasses all the religious
credulousness and superstition on this entire planet Earth.19:5,51
14. Dr. Louis Bounoure, Director of the Zoological Museum and Director of Research at the National
Center of Scientific Research in France
Evolutionism is a fairy tale for grown-ups.1:11
Bibliography For References Cited (These are also recommended reading)
1. John Ankerberg and John Weldon, Darwins Leap of Faith ( Eugene, OR: Harvest House, 1998).
2. _____Ready with an Answer (Eugene, OR: Harvest House, 1996).
3. ____ What Evolution Did to God, Faith, and the Bible, unpublished. See our Feb. 1999 issue for a condensed version.
4. Michael Behe, Darwins Black Box: the Biochemical Challenge to Evolution (NY: The Free Press, 1996).
5. W. R. Bird, The Origin of Species Revisited: the Theories of Evolution and Abrupt Appearance, two volumes (NY: Philosophical Library, 1991)
6. J. Buell and V. Hearn, Darwinism: Science or Philosophy? Proceedings of a Symposium on Darwinism:
Scientific Inference or Philosophical Preference? held on March 1992 and Published 1994 (Richardson,
TX: Foundation for Thought and Ethics, 1994).
7. I. L. Cohen, Darwin Was Wrong: A Study in Probabilities (Greenvale, NY: New Research Publications,
1984).
8. James F. Coppedge, Evolution: Possible or Impossible? (Grand Rapids: Zondervan, 1973).
9. Michael Denton, Evolution: a Theory in Crisis (Rockville MN: Woodbine House, 1986).
10. Phillip P. Johnson, Darwin on Trial (InterVarsity 1991); Defeating Darwinism by Opening Minds
(InterVarsity 1997).
11. _____Reason in the Balance: The Case Against Naturalism in Science, Law, and Education (InterVarsity,
1995).

12. Lane P. Lester, and Raymond G. Bohlin, The Natural Limits to Biological Change (Waco, TX: Word, 1984).
13. Marvin L. Lubenow, Bones of Contention: a Creationist Assessment of Human Fossils (Grand Rapids:
Baker, 1992).
14. Richard Milton, Shattering the Myths of Darwinism (Rochester, VT: Park Street Press, 1997).
15. J. P. Moreland, ed., The Creation Hypothesis: Scientific Evidence For An Intelligent Designer (InterVarsity,
1994)
16. Henry M. Morris, and John D. Morris, Modern Creation Trilogy: Vol.1 Scripture and Creation; Vol. 2 Science and Creation; Vol. 3 Society and Creation (Santee, CA: Institute for Creation Research, 1986).
17. Lee M. Spetner, Not by a Chance! Shattering the Modern Theory of Evolution (Brooklyn, NY: Judaica
Press, 1997).
18. Charles B. Thaxton, Walter L. Bradley and Roger L. Olsen, The Mystery of Lifes Origins: Re-Assessing
Current Theories (NY: Philosophical Library, 1984).
18 a. R. C. Sproul, Not a Chance: The Myth of Chance in Modern Science and Cosmology (Grand Rapids:
Baker, 1994).
19. A. E. Wilder-Smith, The Natural Sciences Know Nothing of Evolution (San Diego: Master Books, 1981).
20. Emmett L. Williams, ed., Thermodynamics and the Development of Order (Creation Research Society
Books, Monograph Series No. 1, 1981).
21. Duane Gish, Creation Scientists Answer their Critics (El Cajon, CA: Institute for Creation Research, 1993)
22. Henry Margenau, and Ray Varghese, eds., Cosmos, Bios, Theos: Scientists Reflect On Science, God And
The Origin Of The Universe, Life And Homo Sapiens (LaSalle, IL: Open Court, 1994)
23. For more specific or technical information, see note 24 and/or contact the Creation Research Society, P.O.
Box 8263, St. Joseph, MO 64588 (816/279-2626) or the Institute for Creation Research, 10946 Woodside
Ave. North, Santee, CA 92071 (619/448-0900).
24. The Web has a large number of creationist sites. We recommend you familiarize yourself with the contents
and links of the Access Research Network (http://www.arn.org) and then proceed to the Creation Research
Society and Institute for Creation Research sites.
25. Robert T. Clark, and James D. Bales, Why Scientists Accept Evolution (Grand Rapids: Baker, 1976)
26. Jerry Bergman, The Criterion (Richfield, Mn: Onesimus, 1984)
27. Mere Creation: Reclaiming the Book of NatureConference on Design and Origins, Biola University,
Nov., 14-17, 1996
28. Soren Lovtrup, Darwinism: The Refutation of a Myth (NY: Chapman Hall, 1987)
29. Isaac V. Manly, God Made: A Medical Doctor Looks at the Reality of Creation (Joplin, MO: College Press,
1994)
30. The National Center for Science Education, Voices for Evolution (Berkeley: NCSE,1995 rev.)
31. William A. Dembski, The Design Inference, Cambridge Studies Probability, Induction and Decision Theory
(Cambridge University Press 1998)
32. ______ editor, Mere Creation: Science, Faith & Intelligent Design (InterVarsity Press, 1998)
33._______ What Every Theologian Should Know About Creation, Evolution And Design, The Princeton
Theological Review, March 1996

3SCScientists699

Vous aimerez peut-être aussi