Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
-.
!
...
,
~-----.-----d
---.
-----
---
------...-
.,
LABORATORY
Crown Copyright 19S1. The work described in this report forms pati of the programmecarried out forlhe Overseas
Development Administration,
but the views expressed are not necessarily those of the Administration, Extracts
from the text may be reproduced, except for commercial purposes, provided the source is acknowledged.
Overseas Unit
Transpod and Road Research Laboratoy
CroWhorne, Berkshire, RGI 1 6AU
1991
ISSN 0266-5247
I
. ... .. .... _- .. .... .
.
9
?]
,,
CONTENTS
Page
Page
8.
24
Abstract
8,1
24
1.
Introduction
8.2
Vehicle revenue
25
Z.
The context
8.3
26
3.
4.
The fleet
4.1
5.
28
9.1
Drivers problems
28
9.2
Road accidents
28
4.2
Fleet composition
29
4,3
11. Acknowledgements
30
4,4
12. References
30
31
11
5.1
Freight consignors
11
5.1.1
it
5.1.2
12
5.1.3
12
5,2
Freight agents
Ownerst,ip and operations
12
5.2.2
13
5.2.4
6.
7.
12
5.2.1
9.
13
14
14
6,1
14
6.2
14
6,3
15
18
7.1
18
7,2
Operating performance
20
7.3
22
.,
,1
- -_ .. _. ... . ________________
INTRODUCTION
,
\,
. . ... ..-.
THE CONTEXT
.~
--
..--.
_
.
.-
. .
--
.._
.
111
!
I-.
j/
Shh,,l
/
-,--,
L ,---,
<.$
.J
I
;0
{
p
,,, @
1
SURVEYS AND DK R
SOURCES
of tho
%UIVI)V
stti!tiol!s
atu
Iostud In TOIJIU Al
THE FLEET
aooc
Others
Bedfords
76
7a
79
Year
ao
81
82
a3
84
.. _-_,
,,
,,.
..,,.,.>.,
~~
TABLE 1
Common Trucks In Pakistan
Vehicle
Make
Model
Type
Bedford
Bedford
Hino
Isuzu
Isuzu
Mitsubishi
Nissan
Nissan
Nissan
Nissan
CJP
TM2500
FF 170
JCWFTR
TDJ/DVR
FP415ER
TK20GT
TK20
TDIO
U780E
Rigid
Tractor Unit
Rigid
Rigid
Rigid
Tractor Unit
Tractor Unit
Rigid
Rigid
Rigid
Axles
GVW.
kg
GCW.
kg
HP
Price Rs.
Sept t986
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
3
2
10,920
nla
nla
12,000
15,000
15,400
14,175
16,500
23,000
12,000
nla
25,000
nla
nla
27,000
39,000
26,000
26,000
nla
nla
98
171
200
160
220
310
190
190
160
140
275,000
nla
412,000
398,000
51s,000
730,000
570,000
475,000
480,000
342,000
4.2
FLEET COMPOSITION
HI~ll sidt$d
Tonkur
LOW sldcd
Moh
Fig.4 Vehiclomakc~
.. . ... -, .
,,
X-.
. .
. .
. .
/4
:7\
*-.
. t
r-a
A-.
.
.,
.-
--
4.3
VEHICLE MODIFICATIONS
REPAIRS
AND
TABLE 2
Common Vehicle Modifications
Bedford
Modification
2 Axle Trucks
Isuzu
Hino
Fdt
Nissan
Cent
Vehicle
strengthened?
Yes
No
Dont Know
90
6
4
81
13
6
90
7
3
90
5
5
91
1
8
88
11
1
Chassis
strengthened?
Yes
Nr
Dont Know
59
32
9
30
53
17
43
47
10
57
34
9
80
11
9
59
29
12
Yes
No
Dont Know
89
4
7
48
34
18
64
26
to
69
22
9
64
27
9
53
34
t3
Springs
Strengthened?
Yes
No
Dont Know
66
3
9
80
2
18
86
2
10
66
s
9
86
4
10
74
Ii
13
Extra axle
added7
Yes
No
Dont Know
Engine comparfmert
strengthened?
Truck into
tractor unit?
Yes
No
Dont Know
.._.
.G.
- -..
40
51
9
2
75
23
---
- -. .
4.4
(1)
(se = 13,2)
Coefficient of determination (R): 0.26, Observations: 12
Irl the equation N, M and Year are defined as follows:.
N(x) = Number of Bedfords observed In the
Roadside Interview Survey assembled in
year x,
M(x) = Total number Bedfords assembled
In year x,
year = year(x). 1956! i,e. Year= 28 for 1984)
If this equation represents tho true rate of survival then a
mean expected life of 12.Gyears is Implied. However the
result should be treafod with caution because the Bedford
sales data were Iimifed and t; s survey was not corn.
pletely representativ~ of all traffic. Because the survey
omitted trucks rulming on short distance urban and intra.
district routes (these trucks are likely, on average, to be
older than those traveling on Inter-district routes) there
are grounds to suppose that the calculated expected life
Ijndorostlmated the true value. A life expectancy of 15
years could well be a better estimate,
Hundal (1985b) found a mean expected life of 1i.9 years
in a study of the survival ,ates of 81 trucks first registered
in 1961. Hundals survey related to a wide variety of
trucks and in view of the later standardisation on the
Bedford model and the consequent improved availabltity
of cheap spare parts It Is reasonable to believe that the
expected life of the later Bedford trucks would be higher,
The mean age of Bedford tru~ks found In the Survey was
ten years, However since 1982 Bedf~rd registrations
have declined while Japanese truck registrations have
Increased, Over three quarters of the Hines were less
than two years old and the mean ages of the Nissans and
Isuzus were between three and four years, The oldest
trucks In use were found to be the Afghan-run Mercedes
with a mean age of i 5 years. Most of these trucks were
brought second hand Into Afghanistan,
The data collected from the Roadside Interview Survey
demonstrated a strong relationship between the drivers
estimate 01current value and vehicle age. This is shown
in Fig, 6 and in Tables A3 and A4 In the AppendIx, During
the period covered only relatively minor changes were
made 10the basic Bedford truck model, As a result the
.,
. .
. ..
..
..J.
.,
-..
,,>--.
-., --
,-.
\.-A
_..
-. .._.
___.
___
400
300
100
0
60
62
64
66
68
70
72
74
Mode;VOaf
7G
7S
80
62
64
86
6
5.1
J
o
,/
10
11
- .--..
,----
Consignors
vehicles
TABLE 3
Advantages of Vehicle Ownership to Consignors,
Advantage of
owning vehicles
Per cent
of responses
Less delays
Less damage to goods
Fewer incidents of theft
Increased customer contact
53
32
8
7
Total
100
12
,. ..,_ ____
in situations of fluctuating demand were the most important problem, and the difficulties of trying to obtain return
loads were also cited as maior disadvantages of running
in-house transport operations. Over half of the consign.
ors simply stated that such operations would not be
financially viable or appropriate to ttleir business, and the
comment was frequently made that they could not
compete with the ptivale hire and reward truck operators, Further avldence of this pattern was revealed from
the Roadside Interview Survey where less than 1 per
cent of the trucks intercepted wero operated on an own
account basis.
Sixty per cent of alt vehicles operated by these consign.
ors were Bedfords: other popular vehicles included the
Mazda truck (a vehicle with up 10three tons carrying
capacity) and the Suzuki pick-ups: these vehicles
accourlted for, respectively, i 5 and 10 percent of the
total owned by the consignors
5,1.3
TABLE 4
Disadvantages of Vehicla Ownership.
Disadvantage of
owning vehicles
Proportion of all
problems mentlonad
Managing staff/vetlicles
Flnanciat problems
Empty relurn Iournoys
Other
No reply
43
32
5
1
t9
34
49
9
8
Total
100
100
TABLE 5
Consignors
Relationship with Freight Ag#tlt
5.2
cREIGHT AGENTS
Ownership
Per cefll
86
15
7
00
46
B
4
43
Total
i 88
i 00
-.
It was not possible to draw any conclusions with regard 10
the difference In rates charged per ton kilometre between
those consignors who had a formal contract with an
agent and those who did not, due to the lack of directly
comparable data of toad types and routes.
T01,71
and operations
5.2.2
Consignments
Freight
13
.~
..J
-.---- ---___--
------
TABLE 6
Use of freight Agents, Agents Charges and Trip Distance.
Number of
loaded trucks
surveyed
Per conl of
drivers using
an agent
Mean charge
by agent as
a per cent of
total tariff
less than 50
50- 100
101- 200
201. 500
501.1000
1001.1500
more than 1500
149
225
371
608
528
352
146
20
28
49
66
75
85
79
11,3
8.8
7<1
5.6
5.0
4,8
5,8
all journeys
2379
62
5.8
Trip
distance
Kms
6.1
.\__,
.. - ...--.-.----..-.
..
. .
determined bv SUDDIV
and demand, and a~art
,-----from thp
apetalians of.the NLG there is little direct governtnenl
intervention In the Industry. Entry is cheap and easy:
thero is a relatively lax Iicenslng systetn and there is little
enforcement of axte load Iimlts or af vehicle construction
and use regulations,
The pattern of numerous small scalo entrepreneurs is a
camman feature of the industry with garaqe mechanics,
truck awners and freight agents all exhibiting this charac.
teristic,
Large Industrial campanles awn very fow vehicles and
rely mainly an hiring transport, The few vehicles they da
own tend to be used far local delivery work, The largest
own accaunt fleet is run by Ihe Waler And Powor
Development Authority (WAPDA) which likes 10use its
own vehicles ta transport Its exponslve electrical equip.
menl, althaugh it will hire transport when necessary,
There are a few large transport organlsatlons in Pakistan.
The NLC Is by far the biggest wkh about 2000 Irucks. A
small number af large privately run firms concentrate on
running tractar-lrallers and on moving containers,
specialised equipment and autsized loads.
6.3
TABLE 7
Truck Ownership
2 Axle
Bedford
2 Axlo
Jauarlese
3 Axlo
J[l~nrrese
Japanese
Tractar Trailer
Driver
Other Privato Individual
Fotnily Partnership
Commercial Campany
Federal Government
Provincial Govermnont
Public Corporolion
Others
458
i 958
146
11
2
o
3
2
103
365
15
2
0
0
i
0
14
88
6
0
0
0
o
0
2
77
12
14
0
1
1
0
Tatal
2632
492
i 09
108
TABLE 8
Truck Floots
6.2
.-.
VEHICLE OWNERSHIP
MANAGEMENT
2 Axlo
Bodfard
Is truck managed
in common with
olhtir trucks ?
2 Axlu
Japanesu
3 Axle
Japanoso
Tractor-Trailer
Japanese
Yes ?&
10
i6
26
43
No Ya
90
84
74
57
To[al replius
2623
485
109
i 07
4,62
4,0
9.6
283
AND
15
.H
.. . .. . ... . . -. -.--.,
,,
,...
..-.:
L..:>.
..-,
._-_
.. . .
,. -----
-----
<~.
--
TABLE 9
..
20
Year of
purchase
2 Axle
Hino
2 Axle
Isuzu
2 Axle
Nissan
3 Axle
Nissan
1
4
1
6
10
19
45
13
2
3
7
8
7
11
30
30
3
Tractor.Trailer
Nissan
15
Per Cent
Before 1976
1976
1977
1978
1979
I 980
1981
1982
1983
1984
1985
1986
Total Replies
4.3
2.9
i ,2
2.6
2.3
4,1
5.6
8.7
14.8
24.4
26.2
2.9
2
i
1
2
1
4
4
57
30
1:
37
42
7
1
4
4
t4
17
17
35
6
100
100
i 00
100
100
100
2206
170
i 67
69
69
61
/
RutII of itltt!t(!$t
___
Bedford
Hino
2 Axle
Isuzu
Nissan
3 Axle
Nissan
Traclor.Trailer
Nissan
I % and 60%:
26
23
23
23
22
20
22
21
21
21
21
i7
i 37
267
245
249
39 i
467
Average monlhly
payment Rs
4230
9480
8670
8430
Average payment
Der]od months
52
40
41
44
Average rate
/.
I
Average borrowed
Rs. 000
t 3,600
44
15,070
45
17
~-.. ..-.
16
TABLE 10
..__...__
..
,..
. .. .. .. .
----
~~
_______
.......
----
-:,. . .. . . .
.. . .
..
. .~..
TABLE 11
,, ,.
25
m
Bedford
Hlno
2 Axle
Isuzu
Late
Repayments?
Nissan
3 Axle Tractor-Trailer
Nissan
Nissan
replies
No
Yes
17
83
3
97
t:
20
80
3
97
Ii
89
No
Yes
65
35
84
16
77
23
64
36
79
21
97
3
17
45
38
o
26
41
33
0
i5
39
45
0
14
39
48
0
28
35
37
0
32
44
24
0
1
1
1
81
15
1
i
4
77
17
4
i
7:
15
7
5
0
79
10
6
0
0
61
13
6
0
0
83
11
1709
165
i 36
53
61
37
Bank
Relative
Frland
Vehicle Seller
AganVMoney Lender
~rlp
[Ilsto,lce,
(k,,,!)
7. OPERATIONAL
PERFORMANCE, LOADS AND
TARIFFS
7.1
I
As exp?cled the Roadside Interview Survey recorded a
much greater proportion of long distance trips, Trips of
over 1000 km accounted for 15 per cent of the cases and
45 per cent of the vehicle kms In the former survey but
only 6 per cent of the cases and 29 per cent . the
vehicle kms In the latter survey,
19
i8
I
.
..
100
,
TABLE 12
80
60
40
20
t
7.2
OPERATING PERFORMANCE
20
3Axte Tracior-Trailer
Nissan
Nissan
Bedford
Hino
68.5
75,7
66.8
67.1
75<0
74.1
85,4
87,5
73,7
76.6
86,1
87.6
403
726
607
598
887
809
502
839
665
666
iOi8
957
20
39
34
36
47
5i
98
325
235
205
2TJ
318
40
31
32
46
35
Nissan
188
373
487
448
495
387
6,7
7.9
10.2
8.8
11,8
9>0
17.t
16.3
21.1
i 7.3
27. i
37.8
245
2.1
2.4
2!1
1.7
1.6
t,7
i .7
i ,7
i .8
2!8
3,3
52
33
34
46
42
51
r~iurning to
family
days
a) weekly disianceiravelled
b) monthly revenues andcurreni idprevenugs
and disiances,
and
TABLE 13
Isuzu
Nissan
3 Axle
Nissan
Traclor.Trailer
Nissan
2 Axle
Bedford
Hino
based on:
Alihough Bedford trucks accounied for 77 per ceni of ihe
irucks surveyed ihey provided jusi 50 per ceni of ihe
measured iotal ion.kilomeires. The capacity ihaf different
vehicles provldedlsshownln Fig, 11, which demon.
slraies the Importance of ihe iracior-irailers that ac
counied for 15 per cent of the capacity provided but only
3,5 per ceni of ihe vehicles surveyed.
a) weekly distance
117
i 59
t47
i 32
143
136
b) irip revenues
i 09
116
104
95
112
129
i 08
120
127
112
t 25
13i
c) (rip iimes
109
129
117
Mean of esiimates
112
135
i 25
21
7rIP distance,
fkrm)
-.
e
I
22
I
I
1
7,, !,,
1
,,,,,
I
!,!,,,
i
,!,,,
I
I
1
I
I
I
,,,,,, , ,,,
,,,,1,
,,,,,,,
2 Axle
3 Axle Yractor-Yraller
Nissan
Nissan
Bedford
Hino
Isuzl
Nissan
1702
3918
290i
3850
5682
5940
Mean Loaded
Distanco Km
547
921
724
850
1051
957
Mean Empty
Distance Km
i 58
242
359
236
i 98
387
Per Cent
Kms Loaded
86<5
937
86>8
91.3
967
87.6
Mean Load
Weight Tons
8!1
12,4
tl,4
13.6
20!0
25.7
0.38
0!34
0.35
0.33
0,26
0.24
2<7
4.0
3.5
4.i
5.2
584
3.1
4,3
4,0
4.5
5,4
6,2
TABLE 14
(li%l
7.3
Mean Tariff
Rs
23
.... .. . . .. . ..
/~.
... .--.
....__ ._. .. . . .
._
-.
._
____
TABLE 15
TABLE 16
Commodity
Rail
Tari//
2 Axle 3 Axle& T&T
Trucks
Trucks
Rs per Ton-Km
Kerosene 011
Diesel Oil
Petrol
Furnace Oil
0.59
0.54
044
0,27
0!95
0.70
0.94
0.42
Firewood
Fertilizer
Wheat
Sugar
Coal & Coke
Paddy & Rice
Iron & Steel
Cement
Salt
0,51
0.47
0,27
0,26
0.25
0.25
0.25
0.23
0.22
0.59
0,37
0.39
0.38
0.34
0.32
0.39
0!53
0.44
0,74
0!53
0.32
0.19
0.31
0,27
025
0.30
0,24
Vehicle Running Costs (Mean Values From Different Surveys, 1986 prices)
Rail
Mean Distance
2 Axle 3 Axle& T&T
Trtjckc
-----Trucks
Kms-
488
409
277
844
432
411
350
G03
359
672
1060
1033
i 237
973
1159
916
848
292
348
307
767
i 042
488
635
348
243
0!68
o!5t
571
498
1014
Dry Cargo
026
0.37
0.25
872
638
1002
...\
f
1
10
8.1
,
0
24
0.306
0,397
0.486
0.239
dyrs
0,358
t Oyrs
0,244
i yr
0.259
3yrs
04315
i yr
0.367
3yrs
0.568
4yrs
0.142
0.1
O.ii
o.t49
0.ld3
0.207
0.246
127
131
i Od
159
199
i 73
0.141
0.129
0.19
0.193
0.06
0.065
0.13
0,4 i
0.148
0.102
0.17
0.16
0.035
0,142
0.12
0.07
006
0.16
0.16
i 555
658
1085
i 065
0.41
Trac!or.Trailers
Japanese
0.299
0.285
0.25
554
551
Overall Rates:
Petroleum
Products
Three-Axle
Japanese
596
1521
1043
Two.Axle
Bedlords
Japanese
8.2
VEHICLE REVENUE
0.158
and tho total timo period 10make the currenl loaded trip
togethor with the lime spent empty prior 10making the
loaded trip.
TI1Oostlmates for Bedford trucks rango from 967 to 1086
Rs per day: a differcnco of about i 2 per cent. Because of
tho smaller sample sizes [hero is greater uncertainty for
the larger trucks. For these an adjuslmonl was made to
the Roadside Intorvlow Data to accommodate Iho
directional flow imbalanc~ of trucks Iravolling 10and from
Karachi. Tariffs for loads traveling from Karachi were
found to bo much higher than taritfs in the opposite
direction: this difference was particularly murkod for
25
I
I
,- -
..,
-
_.-.._.
..
. ...:
--
.-__..
TABLE 17
TABLE 19
Vehicle Capital Costs Per Day (For trccks made In 85/86, i 986 prices)
Bedlord
Mean new purchase
price QsOOO
Two.Axle
Japanese
Three-Axle
Japanese
Traclor.Trailer
JapanesQ
305
377
519
625
Assumed vehicle
life
Years
15
13
12
12
68
94
139
167
11)fortrucks purchased
by repayments Rs
84
115
166
202
80
ifl
i 60
185
TWO.AXIO
Bedford
Distance perday
Kms
329
Two-Ax18
Japanese
Three.Axlo
Japanese
304
373
Rs por km
8.3
Running costs:
Fuel
Crew
Maintenance and repairs
Tyres
011and grease
Loading Iabour
Octrol, police, taxes
Agents commission
1.257
0.426
0.322
0.142
0!141
0>079
0.171
0.078
1,333
0.472
0!294
0.142
o#190
0,086
0.193
0.115
i .732
0.587
0!388
0.213
oji93
0.149
0.183
0.110
2,GiG
2.825
3.555
0.207
0.309
0.373
0.255
0.378
0)445
0.243
0.365
0.429
2.939
3.347
~.302
Nel Profit:
i) vehicle purchased outright
0.116
0.213
0.454
0>068
0.144
C.372
0.000
0.157
0.398
11)vehlclo purchased
with repayments
Iii) mean ostlmate Ior all trucks
TABLE 18
TABLE 20
Bedford
Two.Axle
Japanese
Tractor-Trailer
JaDoneso
TWO.AXIO
Bedford
TwoAxle
Japanese
Ttlre~.Axl~
Japanese
1005
i554
Roadside Interview
967
1179
Roadside Interview.
Adjusted for traffic
directiorr llowlmbalance
Activity Survey
l17i
1804
1846
9.3
6.3
18.1
50,6
15,t
70>3
i 662
.
1917
1~86
/,
26
27
I,
.!
- ..___ ...._. .
IIF
. - .
-. .
,,
,,
-. -
\ ,
9
9.1
9.2
DRIVERS PROBLEMS
ROAD ACCIDENTS
TABLE 22
Road Accidents
Two.Axle
BPdfords
No. of vehicles Involved In accidents
during previous yuar
Total No, of accldelts
No. of accidents as V. of total trucks
Per cent of accidents with truck damage
Mean tiuck damage
Rs
Per cent with load damage
Mean loaddamage
Rs
254
288
11
95
25,5oo
20
7,000
Accldenl Type
Rollover
Head.on
Side
Nose.lo.tail
Obstacle
Animal
Other
39
22
18
12
6
o
2
79
Ii
4
6
Olher
Trucks
45
50
7
ao
36,OOO
21
i 1,600
p~r COn/
38
26
5
12
5
0
0
Por Cc/l/
67
26
0
7
All
Trucks
299
33a
to
92
27,100
20
7,900
39
22
16
iz
~
0
2
77
14
3
6
TABLE 21
28
17i6
853
614
522
222
164
55
47
49
21
1
1
1
66.3
33,0
23.7
20.2
8.6
6.3
2.1
i ,8
1.9
),i
o
o
2a7
1.1
4553
Japat)ese
No, of
Answels
436
363
25i
23
37
55
13
29
3
0
0
0
0
0
51
Trucks
Per Genl
of Drivers
67.6
56,3
38.9
36
5.7
8.5
2.0
4,5
0.5
0.2
7,9
i 262
2588
645
29
.- .--.
30
TABLE Al
11 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The work described In this report forms part Of a pro.
gramme of Ioint research between Ihe Overseas Unit
(Ilead J S Yerrell) of the Transport and Road Researctl
Laboratory, UK and the National Transport Research
Centre !Head M S SwatI), Pakistan.
12 REFERENCES
Cundill, M, A. and P, M Hull (i 979) Reducing Empty
Travel By Goods Vehicles, TRRL Laboro/ory Report NO
876. Transport and Road Research Laboratory,
Crowthorne,
Cundill, M, A. (1986) Road.rail competition for fraight
traffic in Kenya, TRRL Researcl) Repor/ No. 41. Trans.
port and Road Reseorch Laboratory, Crowthorno,
Hundal, S, A. (1985a) Transport Statistics. NTHC Repor/
No, 83. Nafional Transport Research Cen(re, Islamobad.
Hundal, S. A. (i 985b) Survival Rate of Molor Vohiclos in
Pakistan. NTRC Reporf No, 90. Nationul Transport
Research CanIre, Islamabod.
Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA), (1983)
The Study on National Transport Plan in tho Islamic
Republic of Pakistan. Tokyo.
ttlaioed, A, (1980) Highway Speed Survey, NTRC Ropor/
No. 5t. National Transport Research Contre, Islamabad
Majeed, A. (1983) Road Troffic Origin.Destination Survey
(i979.80). NTRC Hepor/ No. 67, Nalional Transport
Research Centro, Islamabad,
Maieed,A,(1985) Vohiclo Operating Costs. NTRC
Report No. 79. Nutional Transport Research Contre,
Islamabad.
10
Ii
12
3
14
15
16
17
iB
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
3i
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
Road Section
Province
Rawalpindi - Murroe
Taxila - Hasan Abdal
Abbottabad. Mansehra
Batgram - Bosham
Allock Bridge
Mardan - Malakand
Poshawar. Nowshora
Poshawar - Kohal
Bannu - DI Khan
Di Khan. DG Khan
Rawolpindi . Mandra
Jhelum Bridgo
Guiranwala. Lahoro
Faisalabad - Shoikhupura
Sargodha - Faisaktbad
Okara - Sahiwal
Multan - Bahawalpur
Muzuffargarh - I:alehpur
DG Khan - Rakhni
DI Khan - Dnry] Khan
Pano Aqil - Mirpur Malholo
Jncobabod . Dora M~rad Jamali
Larkann - Ghafi Yasin
Hydorabad - Sakrand
Hyderabad . Mirpur Khas
I(otri - Dadu
Hyderabad - Kar:lchi
Karachi - Thalto
Karachi - Lflhal
Sibi - Dndhar
Nushki - Ouolla
Ouolla - Bostafl
Muslimbaqh to Zhob & Loralai
Khuzdar - Kalal
Desima . Surab
Bosimtl - l>anjgur
Panjgur - Turbal
Turbat - Gawadnr
Turbat - Awaran
Puniab
Punlab
N.W.F.P
N,W.F.P
Puniab
N,W.F.P
N,W.F.P
N,W,F.P
N.W,F.P
N.W.F.P
Pun]ab
Punlnb
Punlab
Puniab
PurlJob
Punlab
Punlab
Punlab
Puniab
Punlab
Sind
Sind
Sind
Sind
Sind
Sind
Sind
Sind
Bnkrchislan
Ualuchislan
Total Intorviows
Qaktchislnn
Ualuchislan
Ualuchist;m
Dalo
10/01/86
12/01/86
14/01/86
16/0i /86
18/01/86
20/Oi/86
22/01/86
2d101186
26/01/86
28/01/86
10/02/86
i 2/02/BG
f 4/02/86
1610218G
18/02/8G
20/02/86
ZZ/02/8G
24/02/86
26/021aG
2a/02/aG
i a/03/aG
20/03/a6
221031aG
24103/aG
2G/03/a6
2a/03/a6
30/03/a6
Oi /04/86
03/04/a6
1o/041a6
121041aG
14/0418G
16/041a6
19/041UG
21/041a6
231041aG
25/04/aG
2710dlaG
25/04ia6
Total
Interviews
69
103
98
68
139
i 09
96
9a
9a
55
43
95
94
134
i 03
i 00
109
110
105
99
79
102
50
i 32
t oa
120
133
izi
99
112
42
99
ai
ii5
13
18
10
29
65
3453
31
.. .,
..
... .
..
. .. . ... .. . . .
TABLE A2
Bedford
NWFP
Province
Punjab
Sind
524
1111
613
386
2634
3
1
3
1
2 axle
12
16
Ford
2 axle
Hlno
2 axle
3 axle
Tractor Trailer
23
1
35
1
i
45
2
3
106
1
1
2 axle
3 axle
Tractor Trailer
13
28
6
5
32
t
6
117
2 axle
10
2 axle
Tractor Trailer
Man
Mazda
Mercedes
Mitsubishi
Nissan
Saviem
Toyota
2 axle
3 axle
Tractor Trailer
7
6
2 axle
Yractor Trailer
2 axle
3 axle
Tractor Trailer
19
16
2 axle
190
7
11
12
2
19
4
2
3
2 axle
4
2
1
2
10
29
7
1
7
14
29
i8
12
43
59
41
10
8
86
98
85
2 axle
2
1
FOI
Two-Axle Trucks
Two Axle Japanese Trucks
Two.Axle Bedfords
Balucltis!an
BMC/Leyland
International
2 axle
3 axle
Tractor Trallar
,.
TABLE A3
Model
Year
1957
1959
1960
19Gt
t 962
1963
1964
i 965
19G6
1967
1968
1969
1970
1971
1972
1973
1974
1975
i 97G
1977
1978
1979
1980
1981
i 982
1983
1994
i 985
1986
Total
Mean
Number
Per cent
In
Survey
2
2
3
2
8
10
72
GO
81
56
5t
i 08
57
63
100
115
211
185
168
8G
120
232
167
102
191
178
139
54
2
2625
0,3
0.4
2.7
2,2
3!0
2,1
1.9
4.1
2>2
2,4
3,8
4,4
8.0
7!1
6.4
3,3
4,6
:::
3.9
7.3
6.B
5,3
2.1
Per cent
of all
Bedford
Sales
30
4.4
6.8
::;
3.2
5.4
7.6
3,4
6.6
7.3
8.8
Current
Value
Number
Per cent
In
Survey
Rs 000
Rs 000
48
60
65
70
83
60
98
93
95
104
ill
10G
127
114
114
123
i 28
i 33
131
143
14G
i G6
i 72
18G
197
223
266
290
325
4
3
i
3
4
9
7
10
12
21
26
65
92
186
42
485
100
i 55
Current
Value
0!8
o,G
0!2
0.6
0.8
1.9
1.4
2.1
2.5
4.3
54
i3.4
19!0
38!4
8.7
113
150
70
217
293
ioi
102
i 82
238
257
265
317
341
383
406
100
337
Others/Unspecified
Total
10
19
622
i 303
845
683
3453
32
33
,,
~~ i
. 1&_..-...
o
----- ....... * ..
,,,
I
(
!
TABLE A4
Model
Year
1974
i 976
1977
i 97C
i 979
i 980
1982
1983
1984
1985
1986
Number
Per cent
i .0
;
6
7
ii
17
40
6
Total
Mean
98
i ,0
7.1
6.1
7. f
11.2
i 7,3
40>8
6.1
Number
Current
Value
Rs 000
3
2
7
6
5
7
13
19
15
i
350
30i
360
3io
503
498
527
soa
i 00
84
Per cent
Current
Value
Rs 000
3.6
2.4
8,3
7,1
5.9
8.3
i5.5
22.6
17.9
1,2
438
425
360
4a4
413
360
5ao
573
634
700
TABLE A7
Empty and Loaded Trip Length Distribution by Direction
TABLE A6
1ocatlon
I(arachl
Lahore
Rawalplndl
Falsalabad
Gujranwala
Sarghoda
Sukkur
Abbottabad
Attock
Sheikhupura
Others
Total
Number of interviews
Consignors
Freighf Agen/s
56
36
23
i
la
14
13
11
10
4
2
i 8a
49
37
29
9
28
24
19
9
9
4
Type
Yextiles
Industrial mechanics
Iron and steel
Agricultural produce
General raw materials
Food/anlrnal feed
Celnent
Agricultural mechanics
Vegetable oll/ghee
Minerals
petroleum products
Fertilizer
Others
237
Yotal
Total
Per cent
35
19
18
17
15
9
7
6
5
5
4
i
25
la,6
10,1
9,6
9.0
7.8
~i.a
3.7
3.2
2.7
2,7
2.i
0>6
13.3
188
To Karachi
Loaded
501. 600
601- 700
70 i - aoo
80t - 900
901-1000
100i -1200
1201.1400
1401.1600
1601-1800
i aoi -2000
66
97
t 93
102
135
129
100
64
60
50
57
70
94
33
45
12
i 49
118
67
27
15
9
8
4
2
1
2
0
1
0
0
1
76
t27
t 78
91
55
96
51
45
24
42
35
59
8a
24
51
14
Total Trucks
1307
404
1056
534
TABLE A5
Empty
551-
100
483
From Karachi
Loaded
Trip
Length Kms
50
100
200
300
400
500
7s.4
934s
61!a
74,3
Total
Trucks
Per Cent
Loaded
45
45
34
35
15
54
10
10
6
13
6
3
2
397
423
626
265
250
268
194
i 2a
i 40
103
104
135
i 96
63
99
29
351a
53.0
59!3
72.8
76.0
84.0
77.8
a5.2
60,0
89.3
88!5
95,6
92.9
90!5
97.0
89,9
653
3420
Empty
106
81
i aa
69,1
839
i on,~
P,I,tI,I<l(,I tl~aUIIIludKIIIUCIOIn
10fllhlSO
DdK5012001Ul C1002510 IOI1O
34
35
~
.-
.-.
-M
,,,
..,
.$
-..
....
.-_
. . .
..- _____
_____
freight industry:
An overview
.
>,
~ ~_
-
~T-&_..-
.. ..
. ~~
.......... . .. . . . .
(@
,)>
. .. ..
_____