Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Note:
I.
II.
III.
IV.
Students are expected to analyze the judgment of the assigned case with focus on both
facts as well as points of law. Presentation may be done in groups with individual
presentation on one aspect of judgment. The slides/write up shall be submitted
individually and must not be copied or common to the group.
The presentation shall be marked on style, clarity of concepts, research applied on the
point.
The hard copy of slide is to be submitted on the appointed date. Late submissions shall be
penalized with deduction of marks.
Vigilantibus Et Non Dormientibus Jura Subveniun( Copying verbatim from others will
attract negative marking!)
S. No.
1.
Case
Name of Students
Municipal Council, Ratlam v. Vardhichand, AIR 1980 SC
1622
2.
10
11
12
13
14
15
1997 SC 811.
Vellore Citizens Welfare Forum Vs Union of India
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
SC 1109.
S P Gupta v. UOI with reference to environmental law.
Exxon Shipping Co. V. Baker.
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
ER 737 (HL)
Datta Mal Chiranji Lal v. Lodh Prasad, AIR 1960 All 632
Radhey Shiam v. Gur Prasad Sharma, AIR 1978 All 86
Pulp Mills on the River Uruguay (Arg. v. Uru.)
35
36
37
38
(Ecuador
v.
Colom.)
law
Solatu v. De Held (1851) 2 Sim NS 133
Attorney General v. P.Y.A. Quarries, (1957)1 All ER 894