Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
|chanrobles.com
ChanRoblesVirtualLawLibrary
Tweet
Search
Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence > Year 2015 > March 2015 Decisions > G.R. No. 212054, March 11,
2015ST.LUKESMEDICALCENTER,INC.,Petitioner,v.MARIATHERESAV.SANCHEZ,Respondent.:
Search
ChanRoblesOnLineBarReview
G.R.No.212054,March11,2015ST.LUKESMEDICALCENTER,INC.,Petitioner,v.MARIATHERESA
V.SANCHEZ,Respondent.
FIRSTDIVISION
G.R.No.212054,March11,2015
ST.LUKESMEDICALCENTER,INC.,Petitioner,v.MARIATHERESAV.SANCHEZ,Respondent.
DECISION
PERLASBERNABE,J.:
Assailed in this petition for review on certiorari1 are the Decision2 dated November 21, 2013 and the
Resolution3datedApril4,2014oftheCourtofAppeals(CA)inCAG.R.SPNo.129108whichaffirmed
theDecision4 dated November 19, 2012 and the Resolution5 dated January 14, 2013 of the National
Labor Relations Commission (NLRC) in NLRC LAC No. 0600185812, declaring the dismissal of
respondentMariaTheresaV.Sanchez(Sanchez)illegal.
chanroblesvirtuallawlibrary
TheFacts
DebtKollectCompany,Inc.
On June 29, 2009, Sanchez was hired by petitioner St. Lukes Medical Center, Inc. (SLMC) as a Staff
Nurse,andwaseventuallyassignedatSLMC,QuezonCitysPediatricUnituntilherterminationonJuly
6,2011forherpurportedviolationofSLMCsCodeofDiscipline,particularlySection1,Rule1onActsof
Dishonesty,i.e.,Robbery,Theft,Pilferage,andMisappropriationofFunds.6
cralawred
Records reveal that at the end of her shift on May 29, 2011, Sanchez passed through the SLMC
Centralization Entrance/Exit where she was subjected to the standard inspection procedure by the
security personnel. In the course thereof, the Security Guard onduty, Jaime Manzanade (SG
Manzanade), noticed a pouch in her bag and asked her to open the same.7 When opened, said pouch
containedthefollowingassortmentofmedicalstockswhichweresubsequentlyconfiscated:(a)Syringe
10cl [4 pieces] (b) Syringe 5cl [3 pieces] (c) Syringe 3cl [3 pieces] (d) Micropore [1 piece] (e)
CottonBalls[1pack](f) Neoflon g26 [1 piece] (g) Venofix 25 [2 pieces] and (h) Gloves [4 pieces]
(questioned items).8 Sanchez asked SG Manzanade if she could just return the pouch inside the
treatment room however, she was not allowed to do so.9 Instead, she was brought to the SLMC In
HouseSecurityDepartment(IHSD)whereshewasdirectedtowriteanIncidentReportexplainingwhy
shehadthequestioneditemsinherpossession.10Shecomplied11withthedirectiveandalsosubmitted
anundatedhandwrittenletterofapology12(handwrittenletter)whichreadsasfollows:
chanRoblesvirtualLawlibrary
ToInHouseSecurity,
ChanRoblesIntellectualProperty
Division
I am very sorry for bringing things from [SLMC] inside my bag. Pasensya na po. Taos
puso po akong humihingi ng tawad sa aking pagkakasala, Alam ko po na ako ay
nagkamali.Hindikopodapatdinalayungmgagamitsahospital.Hindikopoalamkung
[paano]akomagsisimulanghumingingpatawad.Kahitalamkongbawalaynagawakong
makapaguwinggamit.Maramipanggamitdahilsanaiponpo.Paisaisanagagawakong
makakuha pag nakakalimutan kong isoli. Hindi ko na po naiwan sa nurse station dahil
naisipkongmagagamitkorinpopagminsangnagkakaubusanngstocksattalagangmay
kailangan.
Humihingipoakongtawadsaakingginawa.Isinakripisyokoanghindipagigingtoxicsa
pagkuha ng gamit para sa bagay na alam kong mali. Inaamin ko na akoy naging
madamot, pasuway at makasalanan. Inuna ko ang comfort ko keysa gumawa ng tama.
Manikluhodpoakonghumihingingtawad.
http://www.chanrobles.com/cralaw/2015marchdecisions.php?id=206
1/8
9/28/2016 G.R. No. 212054, March 11, 2015 - ST. LUKES MEDICAL CENTER, INC., Petitioner, v. MARIA THERESA V. SANCHEZ, Respondent. : MARCH 2015 -
Sorrypo.Sorrypo.Sorrypotalaga.13
cralawlawlibrary
Inamemorandum14ofevendate,theIHSD,CustomerAffairsDivision,throughDutyOfficerHernaniR.
Janayon, apprised SLMC of the incident, highlighting that Sanchez expressly admitted that she
intentionallybroughtoutthequestioneditems.
An initial investigation was also conducted by the SLMC Division of Nursing15 which thereafter served
Sanchezanoticetoexplain.16
cralawred
OnMay31,2011,SanchezsubmittedanIncidentReportAddendum17(May31,2011letter),explaining
that the questioned items came from the medication drawers of patients who had already been
discharged, and, as similarly practiced by the other staff members, she started saving these items as
excessstocksinherpouch,alongwithotherbasicitemsthatsheusesduringhershift.18Shethenput
the pouch inside the lowest drawer of the bedside table in the treatment room for use in immediate
proceduresincasereplenishmentofstocksgetsdelayed.However,onthedayoftheincident,shefailed
to return the pouch inside the medication drawer upon getting her tricolored pen and calculator and,
instead,placeditinsideherbag.Eventually,sheforgotaboutthesameasshegotcaughtupinwork,
untilitwasnoticedbytheguardondutyonherwayoutofSMLCspremises.
Consequently, Sanchez was placed under preventive suspension effective June 3, 2011 until the
conclusion of the investigation by SLMCs Employee and Labor Relations Department (ELRD)19 which,
thereafter, required her to explain why she should not be terminated from service for acts of
dishonestyduetoherpossessionofthequestioneditemsinviolationofSection1,RuleIoftheSLMC
CodeofDiscipline.20Inresponse,shesubmittedaletter21datedJune13,2011,whichmerelyreiterated
herclaimsinherpreviousMay31,2011letter.Shelikewiserequestedforacaseconference,22which
SLMCgranted.23 After hearing her side, SLMC, on July 4, 2011, informed Sanchez of its decision to
terminate her employment effective closing hours of July 6, 2011. 24 This prompted her to file a
complaintforillegaldismissalbeforetheNLRC,docketedasNLRCNCRCaseNo.071104211.
In her position paper,25 Sanchez maintained her innocence, claiming that she had no intention of
bringingoutsidetheSLMCspremisesthequestioneditemssinceshemerelyinadvertentlyleftthepouch
containingtheminherbagasshegotcaughtupinworkthatday.Shefurtherassertedthatshecould
notbefoundguiltyofpilferagesincethequestioneditemsfoundinherpossessionwereneitherSLMCs
nor its employees property. She also stressed the fact that SLMC did not file any criminal charges
against her. Anent her supposed admission in her handwritten letter, she claimed that she was
unassisted by counsel when she executed the same and, thus, was inadmissible for being
unconstitutional.26
cralawred
Foritspart,27SLMCcontendedthatSanchezwasvalidlydismissedforjustcauseasshehadcommitted
theft in violation of Section 1,28 Rule I of the SLMC Code of Discipline,29 which punishes acts of
dishonesty, i.e., robbery, theft, pilferage, and misappropriation of funds, with termination from
service.
chanroblesvirtuallawlibrary
TheLARuling
March-2015 Jurisprudence
A.C. No. 7158, March 09, 2015 YOLANDA A.
ANDRES,MINETTEA.MERCADO,ANDELITOP.ANDRES
, Complainants, v. ATTY. SALIMATHAR V. NAMBI,
Respondent.
A.C. No. 5816, March 10, 2015 DR. ELMAR O.
PEREZ, Complainant, v. ATTY. TRISTAN A. CATINDIG
ANDATTY.KARENE.BAYDO,Respondents.
G.R. No. 211497, March 18, 2015 HOCHENG
PHILIPPINES CORPORATION, Petitioner, v. ANTONIO
M.FARRALES,Respondent.
G.R. No. 190828, March 16, 2015 ONOFRE V.
MONTERO, EDGARDO N. ESTRAERO, RENING P.
PADRE, GABRIEL A. MADERA, HERMINIO T. TACLA,
NELSON C. VILORIA, DEMETRIO Q. PAJARILLO,
ALFREDO R. AGANON, REYNALDO AVILA, ALBERT T.
RUIZ,NESTORY.YAGO,HARTYM.TUPASI,AGUSTINR.
AVILA, JR. OR MARCOS R. AVILA, BONIFACIO B.
GAANO, JOSELITO D. CUENTA, JONAS P. ESTILONG,
DOMINADOR C. CANARIA, GENARO C. RONDARIS,
HERARDO M. DULAY, FRANKLIN A. RAVINA, JR., AND
RUBEN
C.
CABELLO,
Petitioners,
v.
TIMES
TRANSPORTATION CO., INC., AND SANTIAGO
RONDARIS, MENCORP TRANSPORT SYSTEMS, INC.,
VIRGINIA R. MENDOZA AND REYNALDO MENDOZA,
Respondents.
A.C. No. 7593, March 11, 2015 ALVIN S.
FELICIANO, Complainant, v. ATTY. CARMELITA
BAUTISTALOZADA,Respondents.
InaDecision30datedMay27,2012,theLaborArbiter(LA)ruledthatSanchezwasvalidlydismissed31
forintentionallytakingthepropertyofSLMCsclientsforherownpersonalbenefit,32whichconstitutes
anactofdishonestyasprovidedunderSLMCsCodeofDiscipline.
According to the LA, Sanchezs act of theft was evinced by her attempt to bring the questioned items
thatdidnotbelongtoheroutofSLMCspremisesthiswasfoundtobeanalogoustoseriousmisconduct
whichisajustcausetodismissher.33ThefactthattheitemsshetookwereneitherSLMCsnorherco
employees property was not found by the LA to be material since the SLMC Code of Discipline clearly
providesthatactsofdishonestycommittedtoSLMC,itsdoctors,itsemployees,aswellasitscustomers,
are punishable by a penalty of termination from service.34 To this, the LA opined that [i]t is rather
illogical to distinguish the persons with whom the [said] acts may be committed as SLMC is also
answerable to the properties of its patients.35 Moreover, the LA observed that Sanchez was aware of
SLMCs strict policy regarding the taking of hospital/medical items as evidenced by her handwritten
letter,36 but nonetheless committed the said misconduct. Finally, the LA pointed out that SLMCs non
filing of a criminal case against Sanchez did not preclude a determination of her serious misconduct,
consideringthatthefilingofacriminalcaseisentirelyseparateanddistinctfromthedeterminationof
justcauseforterminationofemployment.37
cralawred
Aggrieved,Sanchezappealed38totheNLRC.
chanroblesvirtuallawlibrary
TheNLRCRuling
InaDecision39datedNovember19,2012,theNLRCreversedandsetasidetheLAruling,andheldthat
Sanchezwasillegallydismissed.
The NLRC declared that the alleged violation of Sanchez was a unique case, considering that keeping
excess hospital stocks or hoarding was an admitted practice amongst nurses in the Pediatric Unit
which had been tolerated by SLMC management for a long time.40 The NLRC held that while Sanchez
expressedremorseforhermisconductinherhandwrittenletter,shemanifestedthatsheonlyhoarded
thequestioneditemsforfutureuseincasetheirmedicalsuppliesaredepleted,andnotforherpersonal
benefit.41ItfurtherheldthatSLMCfailedtoestablishthatSanchezwasmotivatedbyillwillwhenshe
brought out the questioned items, noting: (a) the testimony of SG Manzanade during the conference
before the ELRD of Sanchezs demeanor when she was apprehended, i.e.,[d]i naman siya masyado
nataranta,42 and her consequent offer to return the pouch43 and (b) that the said pouch was not
hidden underneath the bag.44 Finally, the NLRC concluded that the punishment of dismissal was too
harshandtheone(1)monthpreventivesuspensionalreadyimposedonandservedbySanchezwasthe
appropriate penalty.45 Accordingly, the NLRC ordered her reinstatement, and the payment of
backwages,otherbenefits,andattorneysfees.46
cralawred
Unconvinced, SLMC moved for reconsideration47 which was, however, denied in a Resolution48 dated
January14,2013.Thus,itfiledapetitionforcertiorari49beforetheCA.
A.C.No.5914,March11,2015SPOUSESROGELIO
AMATORIO AND AIDA AMATORIO, Complainants, v.
ATTY. FRANCISCO DY YAP AND ATTY. WHELMA F.
SITONYAP,Respondents.
InaDecision50datedNovember21,2013,theCAupheldtheNLRC,rulingthatthelatterdidnotgravely
http://www.chanrobles.com/cralaw/2015marchdecisions.php?id=206
chanroblesvirtuallawlibrary
TheCARuling
abuseitsdiscretioninfindingthatSanchezwasillegallydismissed.
It ruled that Sanchezs offense did not qualify as serious misconduct, given that: (a) the questioned
items found in her possession were not SLMC property since said items were paid for by discharged
patients,thusdiscountinganymaterialoreconomicdamageonSLMCspart(b)theretentionofexcess
medicalsupplieswasanadmittedpracticeamongstnursesinthePediatricUnitwhichwastoleratedby
2/8
9/28/2016 G.R. No. 212054, March 11, 2015 - ST. LUKES MEDICAL CENTER, INC., Petitioner, v. MARIA THERESA V. SANCHEZ, Respondent. : MARCH 2015 -
SLMC(c)itwasillogicalforSancheztoleavethepouchinherbagsinceshewouldbesubjectedtoa
routine inspection (d) Sanchezs lack of intention to bring out the pouch was manifested by her
composeddemeanoruponapprehensionandoffertoreturnthepouchtothetreatmentroomand(e)
had SLMC honestly believed that Sanchez committed theft or pilferage, it should have filed the
appropriatecriminalcase,butfailedtodoso.51Moreover,whiletheCArecognizedthatSLMChadthe
management prerogative to discipline its erring employees, it, however, declared that such right must
beexercisedhumanely.Assuch,SLMCshouldonlyimposepenaltiescommensuratewiththedegreeof
infraction. Considering that there was no indication that Sanchezs actions were perpetrated for self
interestorforanunlawfulobjective,thepenaltyofdismissalimposedonherwasgrosslyoppressiveand
disproportionatetoheroffense.52
Dissatisfied,SLMCsoughtforreconsideration,53butwasdeniedinaResolution54datedApril4,2014,
hence,thispetition.
ThecoreissuetoberesolvediswhetherornotSanchezwasillegallydismissedbySLMC.
ASBEEGUARDSCORPORATION)ANDMS.MILAGROST.
CHAN, Petitioners, v. ALBERTO N. HILONGO,
Respondent.
G.R. No. 199113, March 18, 2015 RENATO M.
DAVID,Petitioner,v.EDITHAA.AGBAYANDPEOPLEOF
THEPHILIPPINES,Respondents.
cralawred
chanroblesvirtuallawlibrary
TheIssueBeforetheCourt
chanroblesvirtuallawlibrary
TheCourtsRuling
G.R.No.187836,March10,2015SOCIALJUSTICE
SOCIETY (SJS) OFFICERS, NAMELY, SAMSON S.
ALCANTARA, AND VLADIMIR ALARIQUE T. CABIGAO,
Petitioners, v. ALFREDO S. LIM, IN HIS CAPACITY AS
MAYOROFTHECITYOFMANILA,Respondent.G.R.No.
187916 JOSE L. ATIENZA, JR., BIENVINIDO M.
ABANTE, MA. LOURDES M. ISIPGARCIA, RAFAEL P.
BORROMEO JOCELYN DAWISASUNCION, MINORS
MARIANREGINAB.TARAN,MACAILARICCIB.TARAN,
RICHARD KENNETH B. TARAN, REPRESENTED AND
JOINED BY THEIR PARENTS RICHARD AND MARITES
TARAN, MINORS CZARINA ALYSANDRA C. RAMOS,
CEZARAH ADRIANNA C. RAMOS, AND CRISTEN AIDAN
C. RAMOS REPRESENTED AND JOINED BY THEIR
MOTHER DONNA C. RAMOS, MINORS JAZMIN SYLLITA
T.VILAANDANTONIOT.CRUZIV,REPRESENTEDAND
JOINED BY THEIR MOTHER MAUREEN C. TOLENTINO,
Petitioners, v. MAYOR ALFREDO S. LIM, VICE MAYOR
FRANCISCO DOMAGOSO, COUNCILORS ARLENE W.
KOA, MOISES T. LIM, JESUS FAJARDO LOUISITO N.
CHUA, VICTORIANO A. MELENDEZ, JOHN MARVIN C.
NIETO, ROLANDO M. VALERIANO, RAYMUNDO R.
YUPANGCO, EDWARD VP MACEDA, RODERICK D.
VALBUENA, JOSEFINA M. SISCAR, SALVADOR PHILLIP
H. LACUNA, LUCIANO M. VELOSO, CARLO V. LOPEZ,
ERNESTOF.RIVERA,1DANILOVICTORH.LACUNA,JR.,
ERNESTO G. ISIP, HONEY H. LACUNAPANGAN,
ERNESTO M. DIONISO, JR. AND ERICK IAN O. NIEVA,
Respondents. CHEVRON PHILIPPINES INC., PETRON
CORPORATION AND PILIPINAS SHELL PETROLEUM
CORPORATION,Intervenors.
Thepetitionismeritorious.
Therightofanemployertoregulateallaspectsofemployment,aptlycalledmanagementprerogative,
givesemployersthefreedomtoregulate,accordingtotheirdiscretionandbestjudgment,allaspectsof
employment, including work assignment, working methods, processes to be followed, working
regulations, transfer of employees, work supervision, layoff of workers and the discipline, dismissal
andrecallofworkers.55Inthislight,courtsoftendeclinetointerfereinlegitimatebusinessdecisionsof
employers.Infact,laborlawsdiscourageinterferenceinemployersjudgmentconcerningtheconduct
oftheirbusiness.56
cralawred
Among the employers management prerogatives is the right to prescribe reasonable rules and
regulationsnecessaryorproperfortheconductofitsbusinessorconcern,toprovidecertaindisciplinary
measures to implement said rules and to assure that the same would be complied with. At the same
time, the employee has the corollary duty to obey all reasonable rules, orders, and instructions of the
employerandwillfulorintentionaldisobediencethereto,asageneralrule,justifiesterminationofthe
contractofserviceandthedismissaloftheemployee.57Article296(formerlyArticle282)oftheLabor
Codeprovides:58
cralawred
xxxx
cralawlawlibrary
Notethatforanemployeetobevalidlydismissedonthisground,theemployersorders,regulations,or
instructionsmustbe:(1)reasonableandlawful,(2)sufficientlyknowntotheemployee,and(3)
inconnectionwiththedutieswhichtheemployeehasbeenengagedtodischarge.59
Testedagainsttheforegoing,theCourtfindsthatSanchezwasvalidlydismissedbySLMCforherwillful
disregard and disobedience of Section 1, Rule I of the SLMC Code of Discipline, which reasonably
punishes acts of dishonesty, i.e., theft, pilferage of hospital or coemployee property, x x x or its
attempt in any form or manner from the hospital, coemployees, doctors, visitors, [and] customers
(external and internal) with termination from employment.60 Such act is obviously connected with
Sanchezs work, who, as a staff nurse, is tasked with the proper stewardship of medical supplies.
Significantly, records show that Sanchez made a categorical admission61 in her handwritten letter62
i.e., [k]ahit alam kong bawal ay nagawa kong [makapaguwi] ng gamit63 that despite her
knowledgeofitsexpressprohibitionundertheSLMCCodeofDiscipline,shestillknowinglybroughtout
the subject medical items with her. It is apt to clarify that SLMC cannot be faulted in construing the
takingofthequestioneditemsasanactofdishonesty(particularly,astheft,pilferage,oritsattemptin
anyformormanner)consideringthattheintenttogainmaybereasonablypresumedfromthefurtive
taking of useful property appertaining to another.64 Note that Section 1, Rule 1 of the SLMC Code of
Discipline is further supplemented by the company policy requiring the turnover of excess medical
supplies/itemsforproperhandling65andprovidingarestrictionontakingandbringingsuchitemsoutof
the SLMC premises without the proper authorization or pass from the official concerned,66 which
Sanchez was equally aware thereof.67 Nevertheless, Sanchez failed to turnover the questioned items
and,instead,hoardedthem,aspurportedlypracticedbytheotherstaffmembersinthePediatricUnit.
Asitisclearthatthecompanypoliciessubjectofthiscasearereasonableandlawful,sufficientlyknown
to the employee, and evidently connected with the latters work, the Court concludes that SLMC
dismissedSanchezforajustcause.
cralawred
On a related point, the Court observes that there lies no competent basis to support the common
observation of the NLRC and the CA that the retention of excess medical supplies was a tolerated
practice among the nurses at the Pediatric Unit. While there were previous incidents of hoarding, it
appears that such acts were in similar fashion furtively made and the items secretly kept, as any
excessitemsfoundintheconcernednursespossessionwouldhavetobeconfiscated.68Hence,thefact
thatnoonewascaughtand/orsanctionedfortransgressingtheprohibitiontherefordoesnotmeanthat
the socalled hoarding practice was tolerated by SLMC. Besides, whatever maybe the justification
behind the violation of the company rules regarding excess medical supplies is immaterial since it has
beenestablishedthataninfractionwasdeliberatelycommitted.69Doubtless,thedeliberatedisregardor
disobedience of rules by the employee cannot be countenanced as it may encourage him or her to do
even worse and will render a mockery of the rules of discipline that employees are required to
observe.70
cralawred
Finally,theCourtfindsitinconsequentialthatSLMChasnotsufferedanyactualdamage.Whiledamage
aggravates the charge, its absence does not mitigate nor negate the employees liability.71 Neither is
SLMCs nonfiling of the appropriate criminal charges relevant to this analysis. An employees guilt or
innocenceinacriminalcaseisnotdeterminativeoftheexistenceofajustorauthorizedcauseforhisor
herdismissal.72Itiswellsettledthatconvictioninacriminalcaseisnotnecessarytofindjustcausefor
termination of employment,73 as in this case. Criminal and labor cases involving an employee arising
from the same infraction are separate and distinct proceedings which should not arrest any judgment
fromonetotheother.
http://www.chanrobles.com/cralaw/2015marchdecisions.php?id=206
As it stands, the Court thus holds that the dismissal of Sanchez was for a just cause, supported by
substantialevidence,andisthereforeinorder.Bydeclaringotherwise,bereftofanysubstantialbases,
theNLRCissuedapatentlyandgrosslyerroneousrulingtantamounttograveabuseofdiscretion,which,
inturn,meansthattheCAerredwhenitaffirmedthesame.Inconsequence,thegrantofthepresent
3/8
9/28/2016 G.R. No. 212054, March 11, 2015 - ST. LUKES MEDICAL CENTER, INC., Petitioner, v. MARIA THERESA V. SANCHEZ, Respondent. : MARCH 2015 -
Petitioners, v. PEPSICOLA PRODUCTS, PHILIPPINES,
INC.,Respondents.
G.R. No. 200620, March 18, 2015 ROBERTO L.
ABAD,MANUELD.ANDAL,BENITOV.ARANETA,PHILIP
G.BRODETT,ENRIQUEL.LOCSINANDROBERTOV.SAN
JOSE, Petitioners, v. PHILIPPINE COMMUNICATIONS
SATELLITE CORPORATION, REPRESENTED BY VICTOR
AFRICA,Respondent.
petitioniswarranted.
WHEREFORE, the petition is GRANTED. The Decision dated November 21, 2013 and the Resolution
datedApril4,2014oftheCourtofAppealsinCAG.R.SPNo.129108areREVERSEDandSETASIDE.
TheLaborArbitersDecisiondatedMay27,2012inNLRCCaseNo.NCR071104211findingrespondent
MariaTheresaV.SancheztohavebeenvalidlydismissedbypetitionerSt.LukesMedicalCenter,Inc.is
herebyREINSTATED.
SOORDERED.
cralawlawlibrary
A.C.No.10132,March24,2015HEIRSOFPEDRO
ALILANO
REPRESENTED
BY
DAVID
ALILANO,
Complainants, v. ATTY. ROBERTO E. EXAMEN,
Respondent.
G.R. No. 209843, March 25, 2015 TAIWAN KOLIN
CORPORATION,
LTD.,
Petitioner,
v.
KOLIN
ELECTRONICSCO.,INC.,Respondent.
Sereno,C.J.,(Chairperson),LeonardoDeCastro,Bersamin,andPerez,JJ.,concur.
Endnotes:
1Rollo,pp.335.
Id. at 4050. Penned by Associate Justice Ramon R. Garcia with Associate Justices
AmelitaG.TolentinoandDantonQ.Bueserconcurring.
3Id.at5253.
toP615.00.
9Id.at41.
10Id.
11SeeIncidentReportdatedMay29,2011id.at112.
12Id.at110.
13Id.
14Id.at108.
15Id.at201.
16Id.at111.
17Id.at114.
18
Such as black ball pen, tricolored pen, stamp/trodat, bandage, scissors, and
calculator.Id.
19SeememorandumdatedJune1,2011ofLaborRelationsManager,ELRDBenjaminC.
Altavasid.at168.
20
See memorandum dated June 9, 2011 of Labor Relations Manager Allan Jeremy
RaymondR.Ignacioid.at115.
21Id.at116117.
22Id.at117.
23HearingswereconductedonJune14and15,2011id.at118and172181.
24SeememorandumdatedJuly4,2011id.at118119.
25DatedSeptember14,2011.Id.at154164.
26Seeid.at203206.
27Id.at88107.DatedSeptember13,2011.
28Id.at125.Section1,RuleIofSLMCCodeofDisciplinereads:
RULEIACTSOFDISHONESTY
Section1Robbery,Theft,Pilferage,andMisappropriationofFunds
Robbery, theft, pilferage of hospital or coemployee property, and/or
misappropriation of funds or its attempt in any form or manner from the
hospital,coemployees,doctors,visitors,customers(externalandinternal).
29Rollo,pp.120138.
30Id.at199215.PennedbyLaborArbiterFeS.Cellan.
31Id.at208.
33Id.at209.
http://www.chanrobles.com/cralaw/2015marchdecisions.php?id=206
32Id.at210.
34Id.at211212.
35Id.at212.
4/8
9/28/2016 G.R. No. 212054, March 11, 2015 - ST. LUKES MEDICAL CENTER, INC., Petitioner, v. MARIA THERESA V. SANCHEZ, Respondent. : MARCH 2015 -
SUELLO,Respondent.
G.R. No. 200759, March 25, 2015 FAJ
CONSTRUCTION & DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION,
Petitioner,v.SUSANM.SAULOG,Respondent.
36Id.at213.
37Id.at214.
38SeeNoticeofAppealdatedJune21,2012id.at216217.
39Id.at255265.
40Id.at261.
41Id.at261262.
42Id.at262.SeealsominutesofthecaseconferencebeforetheELRDheldonJune14,
2011id.at174.
43Id.at174and263.
44Id.at262.
45Id.at263.
46Id.at263264.
47SeeMotionforReconsiderationdatedDecember7,2012id.at266283.
48Id.at285286.
49DatedMarch22,2013.Id.at287311.
50Id.at4050.
51Id.at4748.
52Id.at4849.
53SeeMotionforReconsiderationdatedDecember17,2013id.at5469.
54Id.at5253.
55Deles,Jr.v.NLRC,384Phil.271,281282(2000).
56SeePhil.IndustrialSecurityAgencyCorp.v.Aguinaldo,499Phil.215,225(2005).
57Malabagov.NLRC,533Phil.292,300(2006).
http://www.chanrobles.com/cralaw/2015marchdecisions.php?id=206
58 As renumbered by Republic Act No. (RA) 10151, entitled AN ACT ALLOWING THE
23,1992,207SCRA415,421.
60Rollo,p.125.
61 Note that Sanchezs objection on the admissibility of her handwritten letter based on
theabsenceofcounselatthetimeofitsexecution(aninvocationofparagraphs1and3,
Section 12, Article III of the 1987 Constitution) remains untenable considering that the
presentcasedoesnotinvolveacustodialinvestigationconductedbygovernmentagents,
butmerelyaninspection/investigationconductedbyprivateindividuals,i.e.,thesecurity
ofSLMC.InPeoplev.Marti[271Phil.51,61(1991)],itwasheldthattheBillofRights
embodied in the Constitution is not meant to be invoked against acts of private
individuals.
62Rollo,p.110.
63Id.
64SeeBeltran,Jr.v.CA,G.R.No.181355,March30,2011,646SCRA728,744745.
65InthememorandumdatedJuly4,2011,itwasmentionedthatexcessmedicalitems
boughtandpaidforbythepatientsparentsorrelativesxxxshould[be]surrendered
for proper handling as specified in the Computerized Nursing Transcription System,
specificallythe[turnin]ofserved,butunused,andunserveditems.Seerollo,p.118.
66SeeSection7.c.oftheSLMCCodeofDisciplineid.at126.Seealsoid.at119.
67Asadmittedinherhandwrittenletter.Id.at110.
68
During the case conference before the ELRD, Ms. Ruth Elejorde, the Nurse Unit
ManagerattheSLMCPediatricUnit,testifiedinthiswise:
datikasinangyarinayannoon,naparanghoardingnatinatawag.Tapos
mayboxsilanoonnapinagtataguan.Ngayon,yungmgaanonila,siguroas
amanagertinatagorinnilasaakinkasialamnilanaicoconfiscateko.So
meron silang mga pouch. Kaya lang di ko kasi ugaling magbukas kasi
privacyissuenamanpoyunsakanila.(Seerollo,p.261.)
69SeeSanMiguelCorporationv.Ubaldo, G.R. No. 92859, February 1, 1993, 218 SCRA
293,300.
70Areno,Jr.v.SkycablePCCBaguio,625Phil.561,579(2010).
5/8
9/28/2016 G.R. No. 212054, March 11, 2015 - ST. LUKES MEDICAL CENTER, INC., Petitioner, v. MARIA THERESA V. SANCHEZ, Respondent. : MARCH 2015 -
HON.JUDGEBENJAMINESTRADA,INHISCAPACITYAS
PRESIDING JUDGE OF BRANCH 9, RTC, MALAYBALAY,
BUKIDNON, MANUEL V. NIETO, REP. BY HIS
ATTORNEYINFACT,LOPEDUROTAN,Respondent.
G.R. No. 207422, March 18, 2015 ANGEL ABAD,
Petitioner,v.HERMINIODELACRUZ,Respondent.
G.R. No. 208685, March 09, 2015 PEOPLEOF THE
PHILIPPINES,PlaintiffAppellee,v.RODRIGOCASACOP
YDECASTRO,AccusedAppellant.
71Panuncillov.CAPPhilippines,Inc.,544Phil.256,268(2007),citingLopezv.NLRC(2nd
Div.),513Phil.731,738(2005).
72PepsiColaBottlingCo.ofthePhils.v.Guanzon,254Phil.578,584(1989).
73RenoFoods,Inc.and/orKhuv.NagkakaisangLakasngManggagawa(NLM)Katipunan,
629Phil.247,256(2010).
G.R.No.175842,March18,2015NILOMACAYAN,
JR. Y MALANA, Petitioner, v. PEOPLE OF THE
PHILIPPINES,Respondent.
G.R. No. 189949, March 25, 2015 CASTILLEJOS
CONSUMERS
ASSOCIATION,
INC.
(CASCONA),
Petitioner, v. JOSE S. DOMINGUEZ, ISIAS Q. VIDUA,
VICENTE M. BARRETO, JOSE M. SANTIAGO, JOSE
NASERIV C. DOLOJAN, JUAN FERNANDEZ, HONORARIO
DILAG, JR., FIDEL CORREA, ALICIA MERCADO, LECIRA
JUAREZ, ATTY. FULGENCIO VIGARE, JR., ANGELITO U.
SACRO, MILDRED ESGUERRA, ANTONIO APALISOK,
SALAMAND.MANGCA,DANILOS.SEGOBRE,EDMUNDO
D. ENGAO, P/SUPT. ROLAND FELIX, P/SUPT. JERRY
SUMBAD, P/INSP. GERRY HADUCA, P/INSP. ROBIN
FUGIRAN, COOPERATIVE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
(CDA), BARTOLOME GALARITA, JR., WILFRE0O
JIMENEZ, HITLER UNTAL, JOEL JOHN PACTORES,
ROLLY CADORNA, RUDY ELIPSE, IBRAHIM LAHI,
RODOLFO BONIFACIO, JR., ANECITO VIEJO, JR.,
JONARD IRAN, ANGELITO BALDONAZA, NIKKO DAJAY,
ROLANDO ASPA, JESON CABATINGAN, JOBERT UGANG
(SECURITY GUARDS), JOHN DOES (MEMBERS OF THE
ZAMBALES PROVINCIAL MOBILE GROUP OF THE
PHILIPPINENATIONALPOLICE),Respondent.
BacktoHome|BacktoMain
QUICKSEARCH
1901
1902
1903
1904
1905
1906
1907
1908
1909
1910
1911
1912
1913
1914
1915
1916
1917
1918
1919
1920
1921
1922
1923
1924
1925
1926
1927
1928
1929
1930
1931
1932
1933
1934
1935
1936
1937
1938
1939
1940
1941
1942
1943
1944
1945
1946
1947
1948
1949
1950
1951
1952
1953
1954
1955
1956
1957
1958
1959
1960
1961
1962
1963
1964
1965
1966
1967
1968
1969
1970
1971
1972
G.R.No.178407,March18,2015METROPOLITAN
BANK AND TRUST COMPANY, Petitioner, v. S.F.
NAGUIATENTERPRISES,INC.,Respondent.
1973
1974
1975
1976
1977
1978
1979
1980
1981
1982
1983
1984
1985
1986
1987
1988
1989
1990
1991
1992
1993
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2013
2014
2015
2016
2012
Go!
http://www.chanrobles.com/cralaw/2015marchdecisions.php?id=206
6/8
9/28/2016 G.R. No. 212054, March 11, 2015 - ST. LUKES MEDICAL CENTER, INC., Petitioner, v. MARIA THERESA V. SANCHEZ, Respondent. : MARCH 2015 -
G.R. No. 206267, March 25, 2015 PEOPLEOF THE
PHILIPPINES, PlaintiffAppellee, v. RONNIE BUAT
ALIASDATUSINSUAT,AccusedAppellant.
G.R. No. 182886, March 09, 2015 SPOUSES
SALVADOR P. NORBERTE, JR. AND ELIZABETH S.
NORBERTE, Petitioners, v. SPOUSES FELICISIMO G.
MEJIA AND ELVIRA C. MEJIA AND/OR THEIR HEIRS,
REPRESENTED
BY
ALEXIS
MEJIAQUERUBIN,
Respondent.
G.R. No. 169407, March 25, 2015 BANK OF THE
PHILIPPINE ISLANDS, Petitioner, v. AMADOR
DOMINGO,Respondent.
G.R.No.201248,March11,2015LETICIANAGUIT
AQUINO, MELVIN NAGUIT, ROMMEL NAGUIT, ELMA
NAGUIT TAYAG, YSSEL L. NAGUIT, ROSALINA NAGUIT
AUMENTADO, RIZEL NAGUIT CUNANAN, CARIDAD
NAGUITPARAJAS,MILLIENAGUITFLORENDO,MARNEL
NAGUIT, EDUARDO NAGUIT, JOSE NAGUIT, ZOILO
NAGUIT, AND AMELIA NAGUIT DIZON, REPRESENTED
BY YSSEL L. NAGUIT, Petitioners, v. CESAR B.
QUIAZON, AMANDA QUIAZON, JOSE B. QUIAZON AND
REYNALDO B. QUIAZON, REPRESENTED BY JAIME B.
QUIAZON,Respondent.
G.R. No. 193890, March 11, 2015 ESTANISLAO
AND AFRICA SINAMBAN, Petitioners, v. CHINA
BANKINGCORPORATION,Respondent.
G.R. No. 191945, March 11, 2015 NATIONAL
POWER CORPORATION, Petitioner, v. SOCORRO T.
POSADA, RENATO BUENO, ALICE BALIN, ADRIAN
TABLIZO, TEOFILO TABLIZO, AND LYDIA T. OLIVO,
SUBSTITUTED BY HER HEIRS, ALFREDO M. OLIVO,
ALICIA O. SALAZAR, ANITA O. ORDONO, ANGELITA O.
LIM,ANDADELFAO.ESPINAS,Respondents.
G.R. No. 175493, March 25, 2015 REPUBLIC OF
THE PHILIPPINES, Petitioner, v. HEIRS OF GABRIEL Q.
FERNANDEZ,Respondents.
G.R. No. 197546, March 23, 2015 PEOPLEOF THE
PHILIPPINES, PlaintiffAppellee, v. BAYANI DE LEON,
ANTONIODELEON,DANILODELEONANDYOYONGDE
LEON,AccusedAppellants.
G.R. No. 195956, March 11, 2015 ABSCBN
CORPORATION, Petitioner, v. FELIPE GOZON,
GILBERTO R. DUAVIT, JR., MARISSA L. FLORES,
JESSICA A. SOHO, GRACE DELA PEAREYES, JOHN
OLIVERT.MANALASTAS, JOHN DOES AND JANE DOES,
Respondents.
G.R.No.184355,March23,2015ARNULFOA.K.A.
ARNOLD JACABAN, Petitioner, v. PEOPLE OF THE
PHILIPPINES,Respondent.
G.R. No. 179047, March 11, 2015 SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, Petitioner, v. SUBIC
BAY GOLF AND COUNTRY CLUB, INC. AND UNIVERSAL
INTERNATIONAL
GROUP
DEVELOPMENT
CORPORATION,Respondents.
http://www.chanrobles.com/cralaw/2015marchdecisions.php?id=206
7/8
9/28/2016 G.R. No. 212054, March 11, 2015 - ST. LUKES MEDICAL CENTER, INC., Petitioner, v. MARIA THERESA V. SANCHEZ, Respondent. : MARCH 2015 -
Copyright19982016ChanRoblesPublishingCompany
|Disclaimer|EmailRestrictions
http://www.chanrobles.com/cralaw/2015marchdecisions.php?id=206
ChanRoblesVirtualLawLibrary|chanrobles.com
RED
8/8