Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
http://palaeo-electronica.org
Kathleen A. Campbell. Geology Programme, School of Geography, Geology and Environmental Science,
University of Auckland, Private Bag 92019, Auckland 1142, New Zealand.
ka.campbell@auckland.ac.nz (corresponding author)
Patrick R.L. Browne. Geology Programme, School of Geography, Geology and Environmental Science,
University of Auckland, Private Bag 92019, Auckland 1142, New Zealand.
prl.browne@auckland.ac.nz
KEY WORDS: sinter, silica, stromatolite, microorganisms, geothermal, Rotokawa, New Zealand
INTRODUCTION
Stromatolites may serve as important proxies
for early life on Earth. Many modern siliceous hot
spring deposits, or sinters, have laminated growth
structures that characterise such stromatolites
(e.g., Walter et al. 1972; Doemel and Brock 1974;
Renaut et al. 1998; Jones et al. 2000, 2005; Konhauser et al. 2001; Campbell et al. 2002; Guidry
and Chafetz 2003; Handley et al. 2005). Sinters
are often colonised by a range of (hyper)thermophilic microbiota that can become silicified and
incorporated into these deposits (e.g., Inagaki et al.
2001; Blank et al. 2002; Walker et al. 2005). The
taxonomic identities of these microbes can vary
within and between different geothermal settings,
and are a result of the numerous niches and
(micro)habitats encountered in these localities
(e.g., Schinteie 2005; Pancost et al. 2005, 2006).
Microbes inhabiting thermal environments are
often placed at the most deeply rooted parts of the
universal tree of life (e.g., Barns et al. 1996; Stetter
1996; Pace 1997; Hugenholtz et al. 1998). Hence,
the mineralisation of sinters and the phylogeny and
ecology of hot spring microorganisms are central
themes in studies concerning the origin of life,
astrobiology and mineral-microbe interactions
(e.g., Walter and Des Marais 1993; Henley 1996;
Farmer and Des Marais 1999; Farmer 2000; Handley et al. 2005). Indeed, hot spring deposits, like
sinters, may have provided surfaces that concentrated organic chemical constituents, thereby contributing to the formation of biological membranes
important for the origin of life (Henley 1996).
Studies concerned with the formation of sinter
and the distribution of their associated microbiota
require an understanding of the different litho- and
biofacies occurring at hot spring sites (Farmer
2000). The deposition of actively forming sinters
and the occurrence of specific microorganisms are
affected by shifting environmental parameters that
result in zonations around hot spring effluents with
respect to sinter morphology, texture, and microbial
species composition. In particular, deposits of sin2
ter and their microbiota can act as sensitive indicators of pH-temperature conditions (e.g., Brock
1978; Cassie and Cooper 1989; Cady and Farmer
1996; Lowe et al. 2001; Jones et al. 2000; Jones
and Renaut 2003; Lynne and Campbell 2003,
Rodgers et al. 2004) and the hydrodynamics of
spring discharge (e.g., Jones and Renaut 1997;
Braunstein and Lowe 2001; Lowe et al. 2001;
Guidry and Chafetz 2003; Lowe and Braunstein
2003). From observed variations in the texture and
distribution of sinters, and the species composition
or cell morphology of the associated microbiota,
facies models have been constructed to characterise surficial deposits from alkali-chloride hot
springs (e.g., Walter 1976; Cady and Farmer 1996;
Farmer 2000; Campbell et al. 2001; Guidry and
Chafetz 2003; Lowe and Braunstein 2003).
While ancient sinters from extinct hot springs
may retain some primary textural characteristics
(e.g., Rice et al. 1995; Walter et al. 1996; Trewin et
al. 2003; Campbell et al. 2001, 2004), their palaeoenvironmental
signatures
commonly
are
obscured by the loss of fine-scale microstructure
due to diagenetic overprinting (Cady and Farmer
1996) or differential preservation (Guidry and
Chafetz 2003). In addition, interpreting ancient sinter facies requires an understanding of the relative
contributions of abiotic and biotic factors in the formation of a variety of sinter textures. However,
studies of modern, actively forming sinters allow for
such shortcomings in palaeoenvironmental reconstruction to be addressed (Farmer 1999).
While most investigations are of sinters
deposited from thermal waters of near neutral pH,
very few (e.g., Jones et al. 1999, 2000; Mountain et
al. 2003; Rodgers et al. 2004) have addressed sinters formed from highly acidic (pH ~3 or lower) hot
spring waters. Such studies could potentially
enable the recognition of extinct hot spring systems and their deposits, even where there is no
longer any evidence of the original discharging
waters. Indeed, acid hot spring deposits may be
the most appropriate terrestrial analogues for the
PALAEO-ELECTRONICA.ORG
178E
174E
2
176E
177E
36S
40S
38S
Lake
Rotorua
o
Waikat
Parariki Stream
Rive
r
N
Waikato River
Rotokawa
Study site
Lake
Taupo
Lake Rotokawa
Resistivity boundary
Geothermal field
Deep drillhole
Active volcano
Lake
Chloride spring
39S
River
TVZ boundary
30 km
1 km
Taupo Pumice
Figure 1. Study site location. (1) The Taupo Volcanic Zone and associated geothermal fields in the central North
Island, New Zealand. Modified from Bibby et al. (1995) and Wilson et al. (1995). (2) Map of the Rotokawa Geothermal Field and location of the study site. Modified from Collar and Browne (1985), Krupp and Seward (1987) and
Reyes et al. (2002).
PALAEO-ELECTRONICA.ORG
Table 1 Composition, temperature, and pH values of representative sampling localities at 11 and 21 (see Figure 4).
Concentrations are in mg kg-1.
Location
T (C)
pH
Li
Na
Mg
Ca
Al
Fe
SiO2
As
Cl
HCO3
H 2S
SO4
11
72
2.1
2.8
333
31
33
17.1
39
15.7
297
0.63
448
25
0.47
1340
21
84.6
2.26
2.5
313
32
6.9
34
15.5
28
15.8
302
0.51
393
26
3.4
1282
N
Key:
Microfacies 1 sinter (substrate width >2 cm)
Microfacies 1 sinter (substrate width <2 cm)
Microfacies 2 sinter (substrate width >2 cm)
Microfacies 2 sinter (substrate width <2 cm)
Microfacies 3 sinter
Microfacies 4 sinter
Dry cracked siliceous sinter
(indicating former thermal discharge)
Sulphur accumulation
Brown vent deposit
Alluvial mud
Dry alluvial sand
Submerged alluvium
Pumice clasts
Silicified pumiceous tuff
Vegetation (manuka)
Thermal water flow
Scale:
0
5m
Figure 3. Map of the study site showing the spatial distribution of the four distinct sedimentary microfacies of siliceous
sinter formation. Also shown are thermal and stream water flow directions, the distribution of alluvium, sulphur accumulations, outcrops of silicified pumice tuff, and vegetation.
6
PALAEO-ELECTRONICA.ORG
ebullient discharge from nearby vents that produces pulses of thermal water (typically 85C)
washing onto the siliceous sinters. Neither splash
nor spray was observed around these deposits.
However, water level changes were recorded in
this microfacies (Figure 4.1). Sinter forms subaerially on pumice clasts and pine cones that act as
substrates above water level (Figure 5). Sinter
accretion rates were fastest at this microfacies. An
average of 0.24 g silica accumulated on glass
slides over 67 days in this environment (Figure 4).
It is unknown if Microfacies 1 sinter accreted at a
uniform rate or not.
XRPD analyses of sinters from this and all
other microfacies of this study site showed that
they are composed almost entirely of opal-A, with
minor traces of detrital quartz and/or feldspar (for
full width at half maximum intensity (FWHM) values
and density/porosity data, see Rodgers et al.
2004). DTA of sinters from this study also gave
identical traces characteristic of opal-A, with no
indications of clay content (cf. Herdianita et al.
2000a). TGA of these sinters indicated weight loss
of approximately 5 to 6% resulting from opal-A
dehydration (cf. Herdianita et al. 2000b; Handley et
al. 2005).
Microfacies 1 sinter is vitreous, light grey in
colour, and usually cup- or ridge-shaped with
minute microspicules (0.5 cm high) visible on the
uppermost sides of the rim or within cavities (Figure 5.2). The sinter surfaces have multiple, thin layers of silica with an irregular texture, and are
composed of gnarled, broken, and isolated surface
remnants (Figure 5.4). This irregular texture is gradational, occurring predominantly in the lowermost
portions of the sinter, close to the air-water interface. Vertical sections through the sinters exhibit
alternating series of light brown and light grey laminae (Figure 5.5). The laminae range from <2 to 50
m in thickness and alternate between brown to
dark brown and clear, translucent silica (Figure
5.6). No evidence for the presence of microorganisms or any mineral-microbe association was
observed in thin-section. Laminae in the lower portions of the sinters are relatively flat, but become
progressively more convex upwards. On and within
these layers, conical microspicules may be
present, but in a relatively lower frequency than in
Microfacies 2 (see below). Under SEM, vertical
sections appeared vitreous and massive, without
any conspicuous laminae. Prokaryote-sized microorganisms were only rarely observed in these sections.
1
2
4
5
N
8
9
10
12
11
Microfacies 2
13
14
6
19
Microfacies 1
Microfacies 4
21
22
Key:
25
Microfacies 1
24
Microfacies 2
Microfacies 3
Microfacies 4
Scale:
0
5m
Figure 4. Characteristics of discharged thermal water from each microfacies. 4.1 Map of the study site showing
approximate microfacies locations. Numbers refer to localities were measurements were taken (see Figure 4.3). 4.2
Representative examples of glass slides with subaerially accreted silica after 67 days. Differences between slides
indicate different rates of subaerial silica accretion. Dashed blue line marks average water level. Note the relatively
large subaqueous sulphur accumulation in Microfacies 1. A yellow-light brown substance (sulphur? and/or organics?)
accumulated subaqueously in Microfacies 2. Bar represents ~3 cm. Silica accretion rates were unable to be measured for Microfacies 3.
SEM examination revealed that silica deposited predominantly as spheres of opal-A that are
primarily <10 nm to 50 nm in diameter. However,
spheres can grow up to 500 nm in diameter
through the aggregation of smaller spheres. Two
types of sphere shapes were observed: (1) freshly
deposited, round equidimensional spheres; and (2)
more poorly defined spheres with interparticle
necks (Figure 8.1-8.2) (cf. Iler 1979, figure 3.24).
The poorly defined sphere shape-texture was pervasive on Microfacies 1 sinter. Associations
between this texture and microorganisms were not
observed under SEM. In addition to silica, well
developed crystals of gypsum, barite, and sulphur
were present. No clay minerals were observed
8
PALAEO-ELECTRONICA.ORG
Figure 4 (continued) 4.3 Temperature, pH, water level changes and silica accretion measurements. N.R. = not
recorded. No significant water temperature changes were observed between seasons.
Microfacies
Stream
Water temperature
(summer/winter)
(C)
30.8/17
49
55
58
57.9
8/12
2.23
N.R.
55
12/18
2.23
0.1289
54.6
12/15
N.R.
N.R.
58
12/16
2.3
0.1281
2 and 3
59.8
6/10
2.13
N.R.
10
45
No change
2.24
0.0092
0.0802
Locality
number
1
Water pH
2.03
Silica accumulation
over 67 days (g)
N.R.
12/14
2.3
0.1287
N.R.
2.25
N.R.
20/23
2.14
N.R.
11
85
10/12
2.10
12
64.2
10/14
2.13
N.R.
13
54
10/19
2.12
N.R.
14
38.8
130/136
N.R.
N.R.
15
63
5/8
2.24
N.R.
16
63.9
6/10
N.R.
N.R.
17
83.2
N.R.
2.28
0.2752
18
76.1
25/28
N.R.
N.R.
19
78.2
20/25
N.R.
0.2036
0.0098
20
67
No change
N.R.
21
84.6
N.R.
2.26
N.R.
22
59.4
18/20
2.23
N.R.
23
78.1
21/25
2.27
N.R.
24
52
No change
2.22
N.R.
25
91
N.R.
N.R.
N.R.
26
Stream
33.2/20.9
120/130
N.R.
N.R.
rounded by small cavities, taller nodules are associated with deeper cavities and larger ridges.
The lower portions of Microfacies 1 sinters
exhibit isolated patches of surficial silica sheets
(Figure 9.1). These sheets appeared to have
become progressively contracted and diminished,
particularly around necks (Figure 9.2), so as to
leave behind isolated remnants of a formerly continuous surface. The patches are bound by anastomosing ridges (Figure 9.3) that are larger towards
the outer fringes of these isolated patches (Figure
9.4). Figure 9.1-9.4 show the surface of silica
grown onto a glass slide for one month in a Microfacies 1 setting. Surfaces of natural Microfacies 1
sinter show even more extreme forms of isolated
remnants (Figure 9.5-9.6), presumably because
they have been in this environment for much longer
than the slides. These remnants contain concentric
laminae, mirroring the topography of the underlying
layers, as well as ridges, which are larger on the
fringes.
Figure 5. Field occurrences and hand specimens of Microfacies 1 sinter. (1) Overview of Microfacies 1 represented
by a sulphur-emitting vents (84C) around which subaerial sinter forms (red arrows). White-grey and orange deposits
to the left and right belong to Microfacies 2 and 4, respectively. Green microbial mats form where water cools to
<52.5C. Note copious steam emission around sulphur discharging vent. Bar represents ~1.5 m. (2) Cup-shaped sinter (grey rim) depositing on the surface of a pumice clast. Spicules formed within a cavity on the uppermost side of the
rim (red arrow). Bar represents 3 cm. (3) Ridge-shaped sinter on a pumice clast. Bar represents 3.5 cm. (4) Close-up
of the lower portion of a Microfacies 1 sinter deposit. Multiple flat siliceous layers (yellow arrows) exhibit an irregular,
gnarled surface texture. Isolated patches of silica (red arrows) also occur. (5) Vertical section through sinter and pumice substratum. Note the alternating light brown and light grey laminae. (6) Thin-section micrograph showing microspicules (red arrows) along the length of a brown lamina. Laminae become increasingly more convex upwards.
Schinteie 2005). The mats occur where temperatures are between 52.5 and 30C. On sinter, the
mats are at their thickest (1 mm) at ~ 45C. On the
uppermost portions of the sinters, where temperatures are often slightly cooler and less exposed to
thermal water, the mats become faint and disappear.
The sinters are white to vitreous in colour, and
typified by significant spicular growth (Figure 10).
The spicules are needle-like to conical in shape, 1
10
to 3 mm wide, and from <1 mm to ~1 cm long. Spicules are densely packed, accrete perpendicular to
the substratum, and become progressively smaller
outward towards the water. A rim forms where spicules progressively link laterally with each other
through a continuous deposition of silica (Figure
10.2 and 10.5; cf. Handley 2004). Vertical sections
through these sinters revealed alternating light and
dark laminae (Figure 10.6).
PALAEO-ELECTRONICA.ORG
Figure 6. Microbial colonisation and microcolony formation associated with Microfacies 1 sinter. (1) Irregularly lobed,
coccoidal cells, and associated EPS. (2) Close-up of a conical microcolony. (3) Preferential silicification on the uppermost portion of a microcolony. (4) Colonisation of a silica substratum (yellow arrow) by a succession of partially silicified biofilm. Red arrows indicate acicular, aluminum, and oxygen-rich minerals (as determined by EDS) of unknown
phase.
The laminae alternate among laterally continuous green, brown, and translucent silica (Figure
11.1). As in Microfacies 1, laminae in the lower sinter portions are relatively flat but become progressively convex upwards (Figure 11.2), culminating in
spicules composed of parabolic laminae. The fate
of incipient spicules varied over time; some
became reinforced by the deposition of successive
laminae, whereas others were smothered or dampened by the lamination process (Figure 11.3 and
11.4). Overall, the relief of the sinters increased
over time, with surfaces characterised by abundant, erect, and free-standing spicular structures
with parabolic laminae. Numerous spicules also
exhibit branching and small (~0.5 mm) projections
with internal convex laminae.
The green laminae observed in thin section
(Figure 11.5) are composed of spheres that are
similar in size (2-10 m) and appearance to the
coccoidal cells present in the green biomats (Figure 11.6). These cells are restricted to the lower
and middle portions of Microfacies 2 sinter, corresponding to the distribution of the living green
mats. Diatom tests occur throughout the sinter.
As in Microfacies 1, sinter morphology also is
controlled by substrate shape and dimensions.
Subaerial substrate portions that are relatively
Figure 7. Formation of microspicular structures on Microfacies 1 sinter. (1) Upright microspicules at various stages of
growth and covered with microbial cells. (2) Cluster of cells attached to the top of a microspicule. (3) Knobby texture
on the uppermost portion of a microspicule with individual knobs (red arrows) equal in size to unsilicified cells (yellow
arrows).
colonies became silicified, forming areas of positive relief (Figure 12.4). This consistent interplay
between bacterial colonisation and silicification
also resulted in the formation of microspicules. The
possible outlines of bacilli inside spicules are preserved (Figure 12.6). The occurrence of vertically
upright microcolonies in Microfacies 2 is more
widespread than in Microfacies 1.
Pennate diatoms, predominantly Pinnularia
acoricola Hustedt and P. champmaniana Foged,
constitute a major component of the sinter biota
(Schinteie 2005; cf. Foged 1979; Cassie 1989;
Cassie and Cooper 1989). These diatoms preferentially occupied areas of low microrelief, such as
crevices and cracks, as well as overlying areas of
positive relief (Figure 13.1-13.3). The mode of
attachment for these benthic diatoms is adnate, or
closely appressed to the substratum, with the
entire valve attached to a substrate by a coating of
EPS (Figure 13.4). In open areas of the deposits
that do not offer sheltering by surrounding sinter,
12
PALAEO-ELECTRONICA.ORG
Figure 8. Formation of irregular silica surface textures on Microfacies 1 sinter. (1) Clusters of coalesced silica
spheres. (2) Close-up of (1) showing ill-defined outlines. (3) Anastomosing ridges and cavities at various stages of formation. (4) Incipient occurrence of ridges, associated cavities, and nodules (red arrows). Note broad deposition of
secondarily deposited silica spheres (yellow arrows). (5) Early-stage occurrence of nodules, acquiring a cone to round
shaped surface. (6) Late-stage occurrences of nodules, exhibiting necking (red arrows).
13
Figure 9. Isolated patches on the lower portions of Microfacies 1 sinter. (1) Overview of a sinter surface grown on a
glass slide for one month and showing isolated patches of surficial layers. (2) Necking of isolated patches (red arrows).
(3) Isolated patches exhibiting ridges around their sides. (4) Close-up of (3) showing ridges becoming progressively
smaller inwards towards the centre of the isolated patch (red arrow). (5) Isolated remnants exhibiting concentric laminae. (6) Remnant island exhibiting necking (yellow arrow) and numerous ridges (red arrows) that increase in size
towards the outer fringes.
Sinter from this environment is flat and parallel-laminated (Figure 15.1). Surfaces are irregular
and even rippled in places, which appears to be
due to the patchy nature of ongoing silica deposition (Figure 15.2). During lower water levels, small,
isolated puddles of thermal water occur in the irregular surface crevices of the sinters. Continuous
patchy silica deposition on these sinters results in
silica rims (Figure 15.3) that eventually grow into
cup-like deposits like those of Microfacies 2 (Figure
15.4). Indeed, pumice clasts that rest partially submerged in these waters and on top of the planar
14
PALAEO-ELECTRONICA.ORG
Figure 10. Field occurrences and hand specimens of Microfacies 2 sinter. (1) Overview of Microfacies 2 with sinters
(white deposits) surrounded by relatively quiescent thermal water. A green microbial mat (algal) covers portions that
are 52.5C. Photo width is ~5 m. (2) Cup-shaped siliceous sinter (white rim and green/white spicules) depositing on
the upper surface of a pumice clast. Bar represents 4 cm. (3) Spiculose deposit covering entire substrate surface. Bar
represents 1.5 cm. (4) Cup-shaped and spiculose deposits forming in areas where thermal water flow is confined to
small spaces between densely clustered substrates. Coin at the lower right is 2 cm wide. Bar represents 2.5 cm. (5)
Side-on view of sinter showing a rim along inner portions of the deposit, while the outer portions are covered by vertical spicules. (6) Vertical section through sinter showing a white deposit with fine laminae. Sinter rests on a silicified
sandy substratum (brown). Bar represents 1 cm.
15
2 mm
2 mm
1 mm
2 mm
100 m
Figure 11. Thin-section micrographs of Microfacies 2 sinter. (1) Branching spicules exhibiting projections (red arrow)
on their sides. (2) Close-up of sinter laminae that become increasingly convex upwards. (3) Reinforcement (red arrow)
or dampening (green arrow) of microspicules by the deposition of successive laminae. (4) Conical microspicules (red
arrows) growing on a lamina (cf. Figure 5.6). New layers of silica (green arrow) have subsequently covered the microspicules. (5) Overview of sinter displaying alternating laminae on the lower portions that are light brown and dark
green in colour (green arrow). (6) Close-up of green laminae present on the sinter surface (red arrow) and incorporated into the sinter body (green arrow).
PALAEO-ELECTRONICA.ORG
Figure 12. Microbial colonisation and microcolony formation on Microfacies 2 sinter. (1) Bacilli associated with
mucosal EPS. (2) Silicified mucosal EPS. (3) Conical microcolony formed predominantly by bacilli and fibrous EPS. (4)
and (5) Formation of a conical microspicule, showing the close association between the presence of biofilms and silicification. Red arrows in (4) indicate diatom shells. (6) Cross-section through a microspicule, showing it to be composed
of a network of rod-shapes (red arrows) that resemble bacilli. Yellow arrow points to a modern, unsilicified bacillus.
Figure 13. Lifestyle modes of diatom assemblages on Microfacies 2 sinter. (1) Clusters of diatoms occupying numerous portions of a spicule. (2) Cluster of diatoms occupying a crevice on a spicule surface. (3) Diatoms wedged along
layers of silica that act as surfaces of positive relief. Note the succession of silica layers that drape a spicule surface
(red arrows), forming convex-upward layers similar to those observed in thin section (Figure 11.1). (4) Diatoms closely
appressed to the surface by a coating of mucosal EPS. (5) Fractured diatom cells amassed together in an open area
lacking shelter by surrounding sinter. (6) Cemented diatom cells incorporated into sinter.
PALAEO-ELECTRONICA.ORG
Figure 14. Biotic composition and silicification of green algal-dominated mats on Microfacies 2 sinter. (1) Overview
of an unsilicified green mat showing a predominance of spherical cells that are 2-4 m in diameter. Minor amounts of
bacilli are also present. (2) Silicified portion of a green mat on the top (young) sinter surface. Note the incorporation of
equivalent sized spherical cells into the (older) sinter body (red arrows) (cf. Figure 11.6). (3) Alternating laminae of
sinter composed of silicified biomats (red arrows) and layers of featureless, massive, vitreous silica (yellow arrows).
(4) Sharp boundary (red arrow) between a biotic and an abiotic layer. (5) Close-up of silicified cells incorporated into
sinter beneath living green mat. Some silicified cells include endospores. (6) Preservation of cellular impressions (red
arrows).
monomeric silicic acid from deprotonating, polymerising, and nucleating (cf. Iler 1979; Makrides et
al. 1980; Weres et al. 1981; Mountain et al. 2003).
This inhibition explains both the monomeric form of
dissolved silica in the Parariki outflows and the lack
of subaqueous silica deposition. The low propensity for silicic acid to polymerise in acid environments is responsible for the small size (<100-500
nm) of the opal-A spheres that comprise the
Parariki sinters (cf. Iler 1979). However, monomeric silica may also deposit directly onto the subaerial substratum. Direct monomeric deposition,
concomitant with precipitation of small silica
spheres, can result in the formation of the massive
19
Figure 15. Field occurrences and morphologies of Microfacies 3 sinter. (1) Flat, sinter deposit (brown colour) over
which thermal water flows (blue arrows). Microfacies 2 sinter forms on pumice clasts above water level (black arrows).
Hammer to the upper right is ~30 cm long. (2) Close-up of Microfacies 3 sinter showing irregular surface texture. (3)
Patchy silicification (yellow arrows) and the beginnings of rim formation (red arrow). The rims are frequently above
water level. Bar represents 2 cm. (4) Formation of a cup-like deposit (red arrow) that is continuous with the flat, parallel
laminated sinter below. Coin is 2.5 cm wide.
vitreous silica texture observed in the cross-sections of all sinters examined in this study (cf. White
et al. 1956; Rimstidt and Cole 1983; Handley et al.
2005).
While diatoms take up silicic acid from the
water to form their tests, prokaryotes are not
known to actively precipitate silica by metabolic
activity (Mountain et al. 2003; Konhauser et al.
2004). In this study, it appears that the silicification
of microbes and their associated EPS is a passive
process. Silicification often does not proceed
evenly on the biofilms of Parariki sinters, but is
concentrated in places that are more prone to cooling and evaporation, such as the upper portions of
microcolonies and spicules (Figure 6) (cf. Jones
and Renaut 1997; Lowe and Braunstein 2003).
Recent experiments have shown that silica precipitation is affected by its concentration but is independent of microbial growth (Toporski et al. 2002;
Yee et al. 2003; Benning et al. 2004). Nevertheless, microbial cell surfaces at the Parariki site
20
PALAEO-ELECTRONICA.ORG
1
A
B
2
3
C
4
D
E5
6
F
Figure 16. Biotic characteristics and textures of Microfacies 3 sinter. (1) Colonisation of sinter surface by bacilli. (2)
Patchy silicification of cells by nanospheres (<100 nm) of silica. (3) Overview of sinter section showing a predominantly massive, vitreous texture, although cavities are also present. Silicified, sandy sediment underlies sinter. (4)
Diatoms and spherical cells cemented into sinter. (5) Clusters of cemented pennate diatoms aligned perpendicular to
the approximate air-water interface (dashed blue line). (6) Close-up of (5) showing aligned pennate diatoms.
site, although species-specific patterns of silicification have been noted elsewhere (e.g., Francis et al.
1978; Westall et al. 1995; Toporski et al. 2002;
Lalonde et al. 2005). The tendency of silica to
deposit on the margins of diatoms and EPS (Figure
18.2) is likely due to the higher energy encountered
at these surfaces (Banfield and Hamers 1997).
Atoms on edges have lower coordination and
strongly asymmetric bonding configurations (Banfield and Hamers 1997), thereby allowing preferential deposition of silica. The patchy nature of
microbial silicification on Parariki sinters (Figure
16.2) may be induced abiotically, or by continuous
microbial growth and cell division. The latter would
enable microbial populations to survive during constant bathing by silica-rich thermal outflow.
21
Figure 17. Field occurrences and hand specimens of Microfacies 4 sinter. (1) Thin siliceous sinter rims (orange colour, red arrow) forming on small pumice clasts that rest on fine sandy substrates. Coin in the centre of photo is 2 cm
wide. Bar represents ~15 cm. (2) Close-up showing underlying sandy substrate (covered by green microbial mat) that
is protected from erosion by the overlying orange sinter, thereby forming pillar-like structures. Bar represents 4 cm. (3)
Small hole dug into the sandy substrate revealing warm (45C) thermal pore water at shallow depths. Shovel to the
upper right is 15 cm wide. (4) Vertical section through a thin siliceous rim sinter. Pumice clast underneath sinter is covered with green microbial mat. Red arrow indicates thin internal laminae that are convex in shape. Bar represents 0.8
cm.
Subaerial Constraints on
Sinter Dimensions and Morphogenesis
The formation mechanisms and morphology
of Parariki sinters are primarily the products of substrate shape and size and the specific environment. Silica-rich water reaches subaerial
substrates in the outflows through water level
changes, wave wash and likely through capillary
creep. However, these mechanisms are microfacies dependent, and do not occur everywhere at
the study site.
In Microfacies 1-3, fluctuating water levels
enable thermal outflows to reach subaerial portions
of various substrates. Subsequent cooling and
evaporation ensue, allowing dissolved silica to
become oversaturated and deposit as continuous
layers. Wave wash, caused by the pulsating dis22
PALAEO-ELECTRONICA.ORG
Figure 18. Biotic characteristics and textures of Microfacies 4 sinter. (1) Clusters of interconnected diatoms (red
arrows) distributed on the surface of the sinter rim. Yellow arrow points to gypsum. (2) Close-up of interconnected diatoms (numbered), with silica spheres (~250 nm) precipitating on test margins (red arrow). (3) Colonisation of sinter
surface by spherical cells. (4) Spherical cell with silica precipitating on its surface (red arrow). (5) Vertically upright
microcolony of bacilli on a diatom test. (6) Incorporation of spherical cells, including endospores, into sinter.
PALAEO-ELECTRONICA.ORG
ter producing geyserite. Therefore, spiculose textures in ancient hot spring deposits should not be
taken as the sole facies indicator of water turbulence but considered in context with other proxies
(e.g., oncoids and pisoids; silicified streamers; preserved sinter terraces) (e.g., Walter et al. 1996;
Campbell et al. 2001).
Morphogenesis of Ridges, Cavities,
Nodules, and Isolated Remnants
Anastomosing ridges, associated cavities,
nodules, and pits that occur on surfaces of Microfacies 1 sinter were seen previously on siliceous sinter (Braunstein and Lowe 2001; Lowe and
Braunstein 2003) and silica residue (Cook et al.
2000; Rodgers et al. 2002, 2004). For sinter, constructive processes were inferred for their formation. Such constructive processes result when pits
retain water between wetting events from geyser
eruptions, while capillary action and evaporation
draw water along edges, forming rims alongside
these pits through concomitant deposition of silica
(Lowe and Braunstein 2003, figure 20A). In crosssection, these deposits are typically composed of
cavities and pseudo-cross-laminae that mark pit
migration (Lowe and Braunstein 2003, figure 20B,
C). Micropitted nodular sinters, or knobs, are also
suggested to form from repeated wetting and drying (Braunstein and Lowe 2001, figure 12B).
The formation of ridges, cavities, and nodules
on Microfacies 1 sinter at the Parariki site may
involve a similar component of construction. However, destructive processes in acid settings should
not be discounted. Ridge formation does not necessarily require repeated wetting events by silicarich water, as similar irregular ridges have been
observed to form in sinter buried in humate-rich soil
that was exposed to rain water (B.Y. Lynne, personal commun., 2004). Nodules, similar in shape
to those in the Parariki sinters of Microfacies 1,
also occur on siliceous coverings of pumice on
steaming ground at Rotokawa (R. Schinteie,
unpublished data).
Anastomosing ridges on silica residue are
interpreted to be destructive remnants of surfaces
etched by dissolution (Cook et al. 2000; Rodgers et
al. 2002, 2004). Alongside these ridges, layers of
once-cemented opal-A microspheres become
exposed, while depressions between the ridges
are lined by irregular clusters of silica spheres at
different stages of dissolution (cf. Rodgers et al.
2002, figure 8). Corrosive activity could likewise
produce the gnarly texture (Figure 5.4), necking
(Figures 8.6, 9.2 and 9.6), and the dominance of
26
PALAEO-ELECTRONICA.ORG
the result of progressive strengthening of interparticle bonds at the contact between adjacent silica
spheres (Rodgers et al. 2002, 2004).
Origins of Sinter Laminae
While laminae in Parariki sinters of all microfacies were visible in hand sample and/or in thin section, they were not observed under SEM, where
vertical sections mostly revealed a massive, vitreous sinter body (e.g., Figure 16.3). However, the
irregular, gnarled surfaces on Microfacies 1 sinter
exhibited layering under SEM (Figure 9.5), while
for Microfacies 2 deposits, a succession of silica
layers was observed only at the surface (Figure
13.3). Jones and Renault (2004) related indistinctive laminae in other sinters to differences in the
water contents of opal-A. Since these differences
are texturally featureless, they are not detected by
standard SEM methods. However, etching of these
surfaces, attributed to acidic steam condensate,
reveals alternating laminae caused by differential
dissolution of opal-A due to local differences in silica solubility (Jones and Renaut 2003, 2004).
Jones and Renaut (2004) interpreted wet opal
layers to be formed by rapid precipitation of
hydrated silica. Dry opal, in turn, would form by
slow evaporation, resulting in layers of silica with
less water. Since the Parariki sinters also form by
repeated wetting and drying, a continuous laminated buildup would likewise develop.
Lower portions of sinter from Microfacies 2, by
contrast, consist of laminae that are both abiotic
and biotic in nature. Green, algal-dominated mats
cover a large portion of these sinters close to the
air-water interface (Figure 10), and become silicified and incorporated into the sinter (Figure 14).
Studies of the taxonomically related alga Cyanidium caldarium, suggest that silicification of its mats
result by the continuous proliferation of non-motile
algal cells, with parental cells underlying younger
cells (Asada and Tazaki 1999). Therefore, older
cells will face shortages of light and CO2 for photosynthesis, and O2 for respiration. Asada and
Tazaki (1999) suggested that these stresses impair
the ability of the algal cells to regulate silica on their
walls, so that silica continuously grows on them
and progressively fills the interstices between silica
crusts of different cells.
The restriction of the green Parariki algal mats
to the lower portions of Microfacies 2 sinters (Figures 10 and 11.5) could be temperature controlled,
although moisture and nutrient supply may also
influence their distributions. Brock (1978) found C.
caldarium cells growing in high densities at ~45C
CONCLUSIONS
REFERENCES
Environmental variables, acting on a microscale over a few centimetres (or less) at the
Parariki study site, have a differential effect on sinter textures and microbiology. Hence, four different
microfacies of stromatolitic sinter occur, featuring
distinctive deposit morphologies, textures, formation mechanisms, and microbial communities. Constraints on their distribution include: 1) the size and
shape of the subaerial substrate surfaces; 2) the
relative exposure to thermal waters; 3) water flow
rate; 4) the presence, nature, and taphonomy of
mat-forming microorganisms; 5) water and ambient
temperature; and 6) potential exposure to acid
steam condensate. The dynamic interplay between
silica deposition and microbial activity is a major
factor in the formation of a variety of sinter textures, particularly spicules. Laminae develop in
these sinters due to abiotic and/or alternating abiotic and biotic processes. Different microbial communities also exhibit variable preservation potential
as sinter accumulates, regardless of microbial
abundances.
Results of this study are consistent with previous studies of acid hot spring deposits. In terms of
the associated biota, eukaryotes, namely diatoms
and the rhodophyte taxon Cyanidiophyceae, are a
ubiquitous sinter component at temperatures
<52.5C. Lobed coccoidal and bacilliform morphotypes of prokaryotic dimensions also were confined
to different microfacies settings, with the former
largely restricted to the hotter setting of Microfacies
1, and the latter observed elsewhere at the site.
Clay minerals, as well as fungi, were not observed
in this study. Mineralogically, sinters of Microfacies
1 are similar to silica residue and siliceous deposits
around fumaroles; namely a gnarled, possibly corrosive, surface texture and/or faint silica sphere
shapes.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
We thank J. Tahau (Tauhara Trust) and the
New Zealand Department of Conservation for
granting us site access. Funding support for water
chemistry analyses was supplied by the Marsden
Fund, Royal Society of New Zealand. Technical
assistance was provided by A. Arcila, L. Cotterall,
C. Hobbis, B. James, R. Sims, A. Turner, J. Wilmshurst, and B. Wong. Insightful discussions were
held with K. Brown, K. Handley, N. Hinman, M.
Hochstein, B. Lynne, B. Mountain, B. Ricketts and
S. Turner. We also thank two anonymous reviewers for their valued comments.
28
PALAEO-ELECTRONICA.ORG
30
PALAEO-ELECTRONICA.ORG
Jones, B., Renaut, R.W. and Rosen, M.R. 2000. Stromatolites forming in acidic hot-spring waters, North
Island, New Zealand. Palaios, 15:450-475.
Kerr, R.A. 2004. Rainbow of Martian minerals paints picture of degradation. Science, 305:770-771.
Konhauser, K.O. and Ferris, F.G. 1996. Diversity of iron
and silica precipitation by microbial mats in hydrothermal waters, Iceland: implications for Precambrian
iron formations. Geology, 24:323-326.
Konhauser, K.O., Jones, B., Phoenix, V.R., Ferris, G. and
Renaut, R.W. 2004. The microbial role in hot spring
silicification. Ambio, 33:552-558.
Konhauser, K.O., Phoenix, V.R., Bottrell, S.H., Adams,
D.G., and Head, I.M. 2001. Microbial-silica interactions in Icelandic hot spring sinter: possible analogues for some Precambrian siliceous stromatolites.
Sedimentology, 48:415-433.
Krauskopf, K.B. 1956. Dissolution and precipitation of silica at low temperatures. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 10:1-26.
Krumbein, W.E. 1983. Stromatolites: the challenge of a
term in time and space. Precambrian Research,
20:493-531.
Krupp, R.E., Browne, P.R.L., Henley, R.W., and Seward,
T.M. 1986. Rotokawa Geothermal Field, p. 47-55. In
Henley, R.W., Hedenquist, J.W., and Roberts, P.J.
(eds.), Guide to the Active Epithermal (Geothermal)
Systems and Precious Metal Deposits of New
Zealand, Monograph Series on Mineral Deposits,
Volume 26. Gebrder Borntraeger, Stuttgart.
Krupp, R.E. and Seward, T.M. 1987. The Rotokawa geothermal system, New Zealand. Economic Geology,
82:1109-1129.
Laclair, D.A. and Benison, K.C. 2002. Acid environments
on Mars?: the physical sedimentology. The Geological Society of America, Denver Annual Meeting,
34:175
Lalonde, S.V., Konhauser, K.O., Reysenbach, A.-L., and
Ferris, F.G. 2005. The experimental silicification of
Aquificales and their role in hot spring sinter formation. Geobiology, 3:41-52.
Le Magrex-Debar, E., Lemoine, J., Gelle, M.P., Jaqueline, L.F., and Choisy, C. 2000. Evaluation of biohazards in dehydrated biofilms on foodstuff packaging.
International Journal of Food Microbiology, 5:239243.
Lowe, D.R. and Braunstein, D. 2003. Microstructure of
high-temperature (>73C) siliceous sinter deposited
around hot springs and geysers, Yellowstone Park:
the role of biological and abiological processes in
sedimentation. Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences,
40:1611-1642.
Lowe, D.R., Anderson, K.S., and Braunstein, D., 2001.
The zonation and structuring of siliceous sinter
around hot springs, p. 143-166. In Reysenbach, A.L., Voytek, M., and Mancinelli, R. (eds.), Thermophiles: Biodiversity, Ecology and Evolution. Kluwer
Academic/Plenum Publishers, New York.
Luttenton, M.R. and Rada, R.G. 1986. Effects of disturbance on epiphytic community architecture. Journal
of Phycology, 22:320-326.
Lynne, B.Y. and Campbell, K.A. 2003. Diagenetic transformations (opal-A to quartz) of low- and mid-temperature microbial textures in siliceous hot-spring
deposits, Taupo Volcanic Zone, New Zealand. Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences, 40:1679-1696.
Lynne, B.Y. and Campbell, K.A. 2004. Morphologic and
mineralogic transitions from opal-A to opal-CT in lowtemperature siliceous sinter diagenesis, Taupo Volcanic Zone, New Zealand. Journal of Sedimentary
Research, 74:561-579.
Makrides, A.C., Turner, M., and Slaughter, J. 1980. Condensation of silica from supersaturated silicic acid
solutions. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science,
73:345-367.
Marshall, W.L. and Chen, C.-T.A. 1982. Amorphous silica solubilities VI. Postulated sulfate-silicic acid
solution complex. Geochimica et Cosmochimica
Acta, 46:367-370.
McCollom, T.M. and Hynek, B.M. 2005. A volcanic environment for bedrock diagenesis at Meridiani Planum
on Mars. Nature, 438:1129-1131.
McNeill, K. and Hamilton, I.R. 2003. Acid tolerance
response of biofilm cells of Streptococcus mutans.
FEMS Microbiology Letters, 221:25-30.
Moore, L.S. and Burne, R.V. 1994. The modern thrombolites of Lake Clifton, Western Australia, p. 3-29. In
Bertrand-Sarfati, J. and Monty, C. (eds.), Phanerozoic Stromatolites II. Kluwer Academic Publishers,
Boston.
Mountain, B.W., Benning, L.G., and Boerema, J.A. 2003.
Experimental studies on New Zealand hot spring sinters: rates of growth and textural development. Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences, 40:1643-1667.
Pace, N.R. 1997. A molecular view of microbial diversity
and the biosphere. Science, 276:734-740.
Pancost, R.D., Pressley, S., Coleman, J.M., Benning,
L.G., and Mountain B.W. 2005. Lipid biomolecules in
silica sinters: indicators of microbial biodiversity.
Environmental Microbiology, 7:66-77.
Pancost, R.D., Pressley S., Coleman, J.M., Talbot.,
H.M., Kelly, S.P., Farrimond, P., Schouten, S., Benning, L., and Mountain, B.W. 2006. Composition and
implications of diverse lipids in New Zealand geothermal sinters. Geobiology, 4:71-92.
Purevdorj, B., Costerton, J.W., and Stoodley, P. 2002.
Influence of hydrodynamics and cell signaling on the
structure and behavior of Pseudomonas aeruginosa
biofilms. Applied and Environmental Microbiology,
68:4457-4464.
Renaut, R.W., Jones, B., and Tiercelin, J.-J. 1998. Rapid
in situ silicification of microbes at Loburu hot springs,
Lake Bogoria, Kenya Rift Valley. Sedimentology,
45:1083-1103.
31
PALAEO-ELECTRONICA.ORG
Wilson, C.J.N., Houghton, B.F., McWilliams, M.O., Lanphere, M.A., Weaver, S.D., and Briggs, R.M. 1995.
Volcanic and structural evolution of Taupo Volcanic
Zone: a review. Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research, 68:1-28.
33