Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
ROLL NO. 76
SUBMITTED ON: 26.08.2013
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
I, Kevin James, would like to humbly present this project to Dr. Uttam Kumar Panda.. I
would first of all like to express my most sincere gratitude to Dr. Uttam Kumar Panda for his
encouragement and guidance regarding several aspects of this project. I am thankful for being
given the opportunity of doing a project on Understanding Conflict through Marxian
Perspective.
I am thankful to the library staff as well as the IT lab staff for all the conveniences they
have provided me with, which have played a major role in the completion of this paper.
I would like to thank God for keeping me in good health and senses to complete this
project..
Last but definitely not the least, I am thankful to my seniors for all their support, tips and
valuable advice whenever needed. I present this project with a humble heart.
KEVIN JAMES
2| Page
CERTIFICATE OF DECLARATION
I hereby declare that this research work titled Understanding Conflict through
Marxian Perspective is my own work and represents my own ideas, and where others ideas or
words have been included, I have adequately cited and referenced the original sources. I also
declare that I have adhered to all principles of academic honesty and integrity and have not
misrepresented or fabricated or falsified any idea/data/fact/source in my submission.
...
(KEVIN JAMES)
Date:
3| Page
4| Page
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1) AIMS AND OBJECTIVES...4
2) INTRODUCTION..6.
3) RESEARCH METHODOLOGY.7
7) CONCLUSION.20
10) REFERENCES.21
INTRODUCTION
5| Page
The conflict theory was derived from the writing of Karl Marx. Marxism as a theoretical
perspective became popular in sociology only in the 1970s, about a hundred year after the death
of its founder Karl Marx in 1883. Though he always wrote regarding economic issues, it was his
ability to relate economic issues to sociology that made his contribution to the field of sociology
unique. Even his critics admit that his contribution to the field of sociology is invaluable. The
current popularity of Marxism is due to the decline of functionalism, its promise to provide
answer to questions which functionalism is ill-equipped to provide with, intellectual fashion and
the crisis faced by both contemporary socialist and capitalist societies. Marxism is a
comprehensive worldview for understanding the social world. It provides the theoretical
weapons needed to attack the mystifications of capitalism and the vision needed to mobilize the
masses for struggle. Marxism is a source of interesting and suggestive ideas, many of which
remain useful for contemporary social scientific analysis. Many people thought that the death of
socialism, both in reality and in the imagination, has spelled the final death of Marxism.
Nonetheless, Marxism continues to offer the most comprehensive critique of capitalism as well
as a compelling guide to feasibility. Marxism is an analytically powerful tradition of social
theory of vital importance for scientifically understanding the dilemmas and possibilities of
social change and social reproduction in contemporary society. Particularly if one wants to
change the world in egalitarian and emancipatory ways, Marxism is indispensable. This does not
mean, however, that every element within Marxism as it currently exists is sustainable. For
Marxism to be considered a social scientific theory it must be continually subjected to challenge
and transformation. Marxism is not a doctrine, a definitively established body of truths. But
neither is Marxism simply a catalogue of interesting insights. 1
6| Page
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
NATURE OF RESEARCH
This research work is descriptive in nature. It describes the perspective of Karl Marx on the
concept of Conflict.
SOURCES OF DATA
This study is done with the help of secondary data. This secondary information has been
obtained from published sources such as books, journals, websites, doctrines, research works etc.
MODE OF CITATION
A uniform mode of citation has been adopted and followed consistently throughout this paper.
WHAT IS CONFLICT?
The idea of conflict is basic to our understanding and appreciation of our exchange with
reality of human action. Conflict can be treated broadly as a philosophical category denoting the
clash of power against power in the striving of all things to become manifest. Or, conflict can be
seen simply as a distinct category of social behaviour, as two parties trying to get something they
7| Page
(iii)
Conflicts of ideas: These are ideological conflicts, concerns over what is right or
wrong, good or bad, just or unjust. Often, what is meant here is conflict between
systems of values or norms which underlie a person being Buddhist, communist,
egalitarian, materialist, hedonist, and so on. Such conflicts are always conflicts of
interest. They always involve needs, sentiments, the superego, and a person's
superordinate goal--always engage a person's motivational calculus and his integrated
personality. Conflicts of ideas are pure conflicts of social power.
MARXIAN PERSPECTIVE
The theory of class struggle or class conflict is central to Marxian thought. In fact,
Marxian sociology is often called the sociology of class conflict. The main premise of the
Marxian class theory is to be found in the opening sentences of his famous work the The
Communist Manifesto, 1848 which reads as follows: 3
The history of all hitherto existing society is the history of class struggles. Freeman and
slave, patrician and plebeian, lord and serf, guild-master and journeyman, in a word, oppressor
and oppressed, stood in constant opposition to one another, carried on an uninterrupted, now
10 | P a g e
Pauperisation
Exploitation of the workers can only add to their misery and poverty. But the same
exploitation helps the rich to become richer. As Marx says the wealth of the bourgeoisie is
swelled by large profits with corresponding increase in the mass of poverty; of pressure of
slavery, of exploitation of the proletariat. In every mode of production which involves the
exploitation of man by man, majority of people, the people who labour, are condemned to toil for
no more than the barest necessities of life. With this, society gets divided into rich and poor. To
Marx, poverty is the result of exploitation of scarcity.
Alienation
The process of alienation is central to the Marxian theory of class conflict. The economic
exploitation and inhuman working conditions lead to increasing alienation of man. Alienation
results from a lack of sense of control over the social world. The social world confronts people as
a hostile thing leaving them alien in the very environment they have created. The workers caught
in the vicious circle of exploitation find no way to get out of it. Hence they lose interest in work.
Work becomes an enforced activity, not a creative and a satisfying one. The responsibility of the
worker gets diminished because he does not own the tools with which he works, he does not own
12 | P a g e
13 | P a g e
THE NEGATIVES:
Classless and Stateless society is Utopian
Marxist theory of social classes is ambiguous and debatable. His analysis of the rise of
social classes may be applicable to the western societies but not to Asiatic societies including the
Indian society. And Marxs classless and stateless society is utopian. Nowhere in the world,
including in the so called communist societies such as Russia, China, Cuba, Poland and the like,
such state of affairs exist. Thus Marx has been proved to be a failure in many respects.
Pure Bourgeoisie and the Proletariats do not exist
It is recommended that the Marxist division of capitalist society in to two sections the
bourgeoisie and the proletariat is not seen anywhere. As Raymond Aron has said, The analogy
between the rise of the proletariat and the rise of the bourgeoisie is sociologically false. In order
13 Ibid note 10
16 | P a g e
CONCLUSION
The theory of class struggle often known as the theory of class conflict is one of the most
important theories given by Karl Marx. The contributions of Karl Marx to the development of
social thought can hardly be exaggerated. He was undoubtedly a genius and a profound scholar.
It is not an easy task to evaluate the contribution and influences of Karl Marx and his thoughts on
his followers and opponents. He has profoundly influenced western thought, sociological,
economic and political thought. That being said though, Marxism as a theory has been losing its
16 Ibid note 8
18 | P a g e
REFERENCE
1) Bottomore, T.B., Sociology: A Guide to Problems and Literature, Blackie and Sons
(India) Ltd., Mumbai, 1986.
2) Coser, Lewis, A., Masters of Sociological Thought, Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, New
York, 1979
3) Giddens, Anthony, Sociology, Polity Press, Cambridge, 2010.
19 | P a g e
20 | P a g e