Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Transient Stability Analysis of the IEEE 14-Bus Test System Using Dynamic
Computation for Power Systems (DCPS)
N. Hashim, N. Hamzah, M.F. Abdul Latip
A.A. Sallehhudin
I.
INTRODUCTION
The two major areas in stability studies are steadystate stability and transient stability. Steady-state stability
refers to the ability of the electrical power system to
regain synchronism after encountering slow and small
disturbances, such as gradual power. Transient stability
analysis of a power system refers to the system's ability to
remain in synchronism when subjected to a large
disturbance, such as a three-phase fault and the sudden
outage of a transmission line or the sudden addition or
removal of the loads [1, 2]. Studies regarding these types
of stability are helpful in determining crucial metrics such
as critical clearing time (tCCT) of the circuit breakers and
the voltage level of the power system. In the study of
transient stability, the critical clearing time is one
significant factor for maintaining the transient stability of
the power system [3]. The definition of tCCT is related to
transient stability. tCCT is defined as the maximum time
between the fault initiation and its clearing, such that the
power system is transiently stable. The clearing time is the
time duration from the instant the disturbance occurred
until all three poles of the circuit breaker are completely
open. The critical clearing time is obtained by increasing
the fault time interval until the system loses its stability.
Increasing the tCCT can reduce the protection system rating
and its cost and can increase the reliability of the
protection system [4].
978-0-7695-4668-1/12 $26.00 2012 IEEE
DOI 10.1109/ISMS.2012.53
479
481
(1)
Figure 2. Graphical Depiction of Improved Euler Method; (a) Predictor
and (b) Corrector
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
(8)
(9)
482
480
is
is the quadrature-axis sub-transient reactance;
the open circuit quadrature-axis transient time constant;
1
R
C. Exciter Model
The exciter is a key component of a synchronous
generator control system, as it maintains the output
terminal voltage at a constant level. It provides direct
current to the field winding of the synchronous machine.
The amount of excitation required is a function of the
generator load. As the generator load increases, the
amount of excitation increases. Figure 5 shows a simple
excitation system used in DCPS. The differential
equations relating the input and output variables of this
exciter model is given as:
X 'd' X
X 'd X
E fd
1
Td' 0S
1
Td''0S
X 'd X 'd'
X 'd X
+
+
X 'd' X
X ad I fd
X d X 'd
X X
( X 'd X ) 2
'
d
''
d
Id
X q X 'q
1
1 + sT1
(13)
Iq
X 'q X 'q'
( X 'q X q ) 2
1
1 + sTR
X 'q' X
1
Tq' 0S
1
Tq''0S
X 'q X 'q'
X 'q X
K1
X X
''
q
'
q
X X
IV.
Figure 3. Detailed Synchronous Machine Model (Type Gen5) in DCPS
B. Turbine-Governor Model
The function of a turbine-governor system is to
monitor the speed of the the rotor being driven by the
turbine. The governor provides the appropriate signal to
fuel valve controllers either to open or close the valve,
depending on the deviation of the rotor speed with respect
to the synchronous speed [7]. Figure 4 shows a simple
turbine-governor control system embedded in DCPS. The
input mechanical power PMECH to the generator is
controlled by this turbine-governor system in order to
maintain the output electrical power, PE at an acceptable
level. A speed error signal 7err is calculated by comparing
the recorded speed at the shaft to a desired value. 7err is
used to determine the new gate/valve position. The speed
change as an input is given by = (0 - )/0. The
equations that describe the control transfer function
relating the input and output variables of the Simple
Turbine-Governor are given below:
(10)
483
481
V.
484
482
Pre-fault Fault-on
Post-fault
Pre-fault Fault-on
tct
Post-fault
tct
Figure 13. Plots of terminal voltage for all buses (tct=0.15). (Unstable)
Rank
Faulted Bus
1 (Swing Bus)
0.0592 p.u
0.2230 p.u
0.2355 p.u
0.2572 p.u
485
483
Analysis Result
Stable
Unstable
Stable
Unstable
Stable
Unstable
Stable
Unstable
Stable
Unstable
VI.
CONCLUSION
[7]
[8]
[9]
APPENDIX
TABLE II. DYNAMIC DATA FOR TRANSIENT STABILITY ANALYSIS IN
DCPS
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
The financial assistance of the Faculty of Electrical
Engineering, Universiti Teknologi MARA is greatly
appreciated. Also, special thanks to Mr Ahmad Adib
Sallehhudin for permission to use DCPS software.
REFERENCES
[1]
[2]
[3]
[4]
[5]
[6]
P. Kundur, Power system stability and control, New York: McGraw-Hill, 1994.
P. Kundur, J. Paserba, V. Ajjarapu, G. Andersson, A. Bose, C.
Canizares, N. Hatziargyriou, D. Hill, A. Stankovic, C. Taylor, T.
Van Cutsem, and V. Vittal, "Definition and classification of power
system stability IEEE/CIGRE joint task force on stability terms and
definitions," IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, vol. 19, no. 3,
pp. 13871401, Aug. 2004.
IEEE Committee Report, "Proposed terms and definitions for
power system stability,"IEEE Transactions on Power Apparatus
and Systems, vol. PAS-101, pp. 18941898, 1982.
A. M. Hemeida, Improvement of voltage stability and critical
clearing time for multi-machine power systems using static var
compensator, ICGST-ACSE, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 4147, December
2009.
S.C Chapra and R.P Canale, Numerical methods for engineers with
software and programming applications, 4th. ed., McGraw Hill,
2002.
I. Xyngi, A. Ishchenko, M. Popov, and L. van der Sluis, "Transient
Stability Analysis of a Distribution Network With Distributed
Generators," IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, vol. 24, no. 2,
pp. 1102 - 1104, May 2009.
486
484
Parameters
Generator
Turbine-Governor
Exciter
50 hz
1.9
0.3
0.3
4.57
0.042
1.6
0.7
0.293
0.5
0.3
L
0.25
1.0
-1.0
30.0
0.05
1.0
-1.0
30.0
0.01