Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
More
Next Blog
Create Blog
Sign In
My Microblog
Tweets
Isaiah Janzen
@IsaiahJanzen
Follow
10 Sep
Now more specifically the Jacobian, which is short for the Jacobian Matrix Determinate, is really
the best measure of finite element mesh quality. It is one number which defines how good or bad
an element is. The Jacobian is a measure of the normals of the element faces relative to each
other. Unfortunately, Hypermesh does not show the element face normals on solid elements, but
it is basically an arrow on each face pointing out perpendicular to the face. The range of
a Jacobian is from 1, a perfect cube, to something lower, -1 or even lower. The smallest Jacobian
I have seen was -1.45. When the element face normals start to cross, that is they are not
perpendicular to each other, your element quality gets worse.
For several examples I created the image below. In all of the elements, except for the red one, I
simply translated one node (vertex) to a new location and kept the other seven in the original
cube positions. You can see that as the node moves farther away from the cube position the
element quality gets worse.
Isaiah Janzen
@IsaiahJanzen
10 Sep
Show Photo
Isaiah Janzen
@IsaiahJanzen
9 Sep
Show Photo
Isaiah Janzen
@IsaiahJanzen
9 Sep
Isaiah Janzen
@IsaiahJanzen
8 Sep
Tweet to @IsaiahJanzen
How bad is bad? Abaqus will not run a job with a Jacobian below 0, at least not for me. Ansys on
the other hand has less strict mesh quality requirements. Often times Abaqus will not run a solid
element Jacobian below 0.2 and a shell element Jacobian below 0.3. And yes, I have had one
element with a negative Jacobian prevent an Abaqus job with over 100,000 elements from
running. If you can get all of the Jacobians in your model above .5 you can typically say you have
a good quality mesh.
If you liked this click on something below or leave a comment, please. I can do more like this,
http://www.isaiahjanzen.com/2012/08/the-jacobian-finite-element-mesh-quality.html
1/4
9/12/2014
Yes (6)
No (0)
life
11 comments:
Damien Mesh April 25, 2013 at 12:01 PM
Hi, thx for this article, I always wonder what was this quality criterion because element with the
same jacobian could have different shapes.
Reply
running
Search
2014 (174)
2013 (282)
Reply
2012 (222)
December (21)
November (21)
October (20)
September (17)
August (16)
Finite Element Art
Wow it seems finite element analysis is a bit over my head at the moment, I'll have to start a
bit simpler.
Reply
Doesn't Everybody?
Non-Linear Productivity
nice!
more!
Reply
July (22)
June (22)
May (16)
April (15)
March (14)
Reply
February (19)
January (19)
2011 (204)
2010 (202)
2009 (196)
Subscribe To:
http://www.isaiahjanzen.com/2012/08/the-jacobian-finite-element-mesh-quality.html
Posts
Comments
2/4
9/12/2014
Comment as:
Publish
Google Account
Preview
Home
Older Post
My Platform :
Total Pageview s
310,855
http://www.isaiahjanzen.com/2012/08/the-jacobian-finite-element-mesh-quality.html
3/4
9/12/2014
http://www.isaiahjanzen.com/2012/08/the-jacobian-finite-element-mesh-quality.html
4/4