Exploring The Rich Diversity Of Human Languages

search this site...

Home Categories Places Courses Resources About

Home "Bad Linguistics" Are Indo-Europeans Untraceable?A Response to Jean-Paul Demoule

Are Indo-Europeans Untraceable?A Response to Jean-Paul Demoule

Oct 25, 2015 by Asya Pereltsvaig
[Thanks to LanguagesOfTheWorld reader, Arjan, who drew my attention to the article discussed here.]

In a recent interview titled Indo-Europeans, the untraceable people that racist fantasies are obsessed with*, published in a Swiss
magazine Le Temps, French archaeologist Jean-Paul Demoule, Professor of Proto-history at the Universit de Paris I, denies the
prehistorical existence of Indo-Europeans. Is this the end of the Indo-European controversy? Is there no Indo-European homeland
to locate because Indo-Europeans never existed? Have Sir William Jones, Franz Bopp, Rasmus Rask, and scores of other
philologists, linguists, and other scholars who followed in their footsteps all been wrong? Not so fast! I think Demoule throws the
proverbial baby out with the water, by misunderstanding, misappropriating, and misusing the concept of Indo-European.
Since he has worked on this topic for over three decades, it is not surprising that Demoule sees the Indo-European problem as
primarily an archaeological puzzle. He says:

It has been a fascinating issue, whose resolution would necessarily be through archeology that is to say, by the discovery

of material traces of one or more peoples moving in space and leading to historically known populations speaking IndoEuropean languages such as Greek, Sanskrit or Hittite.

But, as Martin Lewis and I discuss in our book, The Indo-European Controversy: Facts and Fallacies in Historical Linguistics, the
Indo-European problem is primarily one of historical linguistics, not archaeology, anthropology, or genetics, although evidence
from these disciplines can be very helpful. The overwhelming patterns of similarities across the Indo-European languages, their
vocabularies and grammars, support the theory that these languages are related by descent from a shared ancestral language.
This was evident to Charles Darwin, who wrote in The Descent of Man: if two languages were found to resemble each other in a
multitude of words and points of construction, they would be universally recognized as having sprung from a common source,
thus echoing the words of Sir William Jones: no philologer could examine [Sanskrit, Latin, and Classical Greek] without believing
them to have sprung from some common source, which, perhaps, no longer exists (Jones 1824: 28). Although biological evolution
and the development of languages are not completely alike, there are certain clear and undeniable parallels.
Yet although it was originally a linguistic idea, Indo-Europeans quickly became popular characters in other disciplines
narratives. So why does this quest for the origins of the Indo-Europeans ha[ve] all the fascination of an electric light in the open
air on a summer night [] attract[ing] every species of scholar or would-be savants who can take pen to hand (Mallory 1989:
143)? Demoule, in fact, offers a good explanation: If you want to be financed, rather than saying I found similarities between
fifteen skeletons in this one region and fifteen skeletons in that other region, you say I found the Indo-Europeans Simply put,
Indo-Europeans are iconic. Moreover, they are fashionable. Flash the Indo-European card and you are accepted into the best
scholarly clubs. And like any other elements of fashion, their popularity, even acceptability in polite society, comes and goes.
Demoule recalls that after Nazism, for 25 years, there has been very little work [on Indo-Europeans]. The subject returned in the
late 70s and by now it has entered the English-speaking academic system. And like other fashions and customs, the IndoEuropeans have to be done just right. Long coats and fake furs may be in vogue this year, but wearing a long fur coat may
nonetheless be a major fashion faux-pas. Mention Indo-Europeans in the wrong context or with a wrong tone, and you could
easily be branded as a Russian or Indian nationalist, Demoule suggests. And there has been no shortage of those who bent the
Indo-Europeans (or the Aryans) to suit their goals, from racial theorists such as Arthur de Gobineau (1816-1882) and Houston
Stewart Chamberlain (1855-1927), to the ideologues of the Nazi era, to Russias Alexander Dugin (born 1962).
But Demoule takes this problem of ideological corruption by nationalists of all stripes further by implying that such abuses of the
Indo-European concept completely invalidate it. However, in my opinion, the logic of this argument is lacking: a theory is not
falsified by nature of its being misunderstood or misused by someone, especially outside the scholarly world. Moreover, scientists
cannot be held responsible for such misunderstandingsalthough it is their job to explain their ideas clearly and
straightforwardly. (Linguists could certainly do a better job at that, and I am trying to do my bit, including in this blog.)
Yet, setting aside the issues of fashion, funding, and ideological implications, scholars have had a hard time pinpointing IndoEuropeans in the archaeological or genetic record. Demoules conclusion can be paraphrased with the words of Confucius: the
hardest thing of all is to find a black cat in a dark room, especially if there is no cat. Indo-Europeans have remained so elusive,
Demoule proposes, because they never existed. This idea is further developed in his recent book, Mais o sont passs les IndoEuropens ?: Le mythe dorigine de lOccident. He puts forward that the mysterious Indo-Europeans are a figment of scholars
imagination, a useful construct that offers Europeans an origin myth of their own, which all peoples have, says Demoule. He
further suggests that the Indo-European/Aryan myth exempts Europeansall Christians in his viewfrom having to borrow their
origin myth, the Bible, from the detested Jews. (Incidentally, one might challenge his equating of Europeans with Christianity:
after all, Jews settled in Europe before Christianity became a predominant or official religion.)
While the connection between the Aryan ideals and toxic anti-Semitism is worth exploring, I think that Demoules sweeping
denial of the Indo-European concept is misguided, and the roots of this denial are in misunderstanding and misappropriating the
Indo-European concept itself. To my mind, an archeologist who speaks of Indo-European bones or Indo-European pottery is, in
the words of renowned 19th-century philologist Max Mller, as great a sinner as a linguist who speaks of a dolichocephalic
dictionary or a brachycephalic grammar (Mller 1887: 120). What Demoule and many other archaeologists look for is IndoEuropeans as a group united by material culture, biological traits, or even genetics, but Indo-Europeans may very well be none of
those. Instead, they were a linguistic group. And linguistic groups, although somewhat more abstract than ethnicities, races, or
clans, are cohesive groups nonetheless. Imagine what future archaeologists, removed from us by 6,000 years, are likely to find
remaining from our present-day humanity: I think they will have a hard time piecing together the French as a linguistic group,
just as todays archeologists cannot find concrete traces of the Indo-Europeans. (Think of not only France, Belgium, and
Switzerland, but also West Africa, Madagascar, Indo-China, and parts of Canada.) Does the lack of cohesion in terms of material
culture or biological relatedness mean that French is not a language spoken today? I think Demoule would be among the first to
disagree with such a ridiculous propositionyet what he says of the Indo-Europeans is not much different.

If the Indo-European hypothesis, that is the linguistic unity of that ancestral group, is rejected, how can one explain the
similarities among the languages, Demoule was asked by the interviewer. His response, heavy on hand-waving and light on
specifics, is as follows:

These similarities are more complex and far fewer than we might want to say. It is possible to explain them with a
network model, by contacts among populations, rather than on the basis of a family tree that splits from a single point.
Unfortunately, complex models sell with more difficulty than simple explanations.

Lets consider the salient points one by one. That the similarities across Indo-European languages are more complex than some
people might realize (perhaps Demoule included), I am ready to concede, but what does it mean that they are far fewer? Have
some of the alleged similarities been misidentified? Which ones? Some specifics certainly would not hurt here. Next, the Tree
Model may indeed not be ideal to represent the complex web of historical changes in, and relationships among, Indo-European
languages, and that is why the Wave Model has been proposed. In my view, neither model captures all the facts perfectly, and both
are needed to tell the story of the Indo-European family (or any other language family, probably). But it is not true that all
similarities across languages can be accounted for by contact among populations or linguistic groups; identifying contact-induced
changes and those that occurred for language-internal reasons is a complicated linguistic issue (this point is also discussed in my
earlier post). Are words such as English loaf and Russian xleb bread cognates (i.e. have they developed independently from the
same ancestral form) or is one of them a loanword from the other language? Is the Verb-Second in subordinate clauses in Eastern
Yiddish a result of influences from Slavic languages (as I have argued in my recent work) or is it a language-internal development
that reflects errors made by children in the acquisition of their parents grammar? Is the disappearance of case marking in English
a contact-induced change (if so, contact with whom?) or a language-internal process? Questions such as these constantly
preoccupy historical linguists. And the answers to them are often quite complex, a lot more so than its all contact view
advocated by Demoule. But ultimately, in the contest between simple and complex, as scientists, we linguists always strive to give
answers that are as simple and straightforward as possible, yet which find the greatest degree of harmony and convergence
among all the facts (Baker 2001: 31). Similarly to the NavierStokes equations, which may be used to model the weather, oceanic
currents, water flow in a pipe, blood flow in an artery, and air flow around an aircraft or bird wing, the Indo-European hypothesis
can account for parallelisms in cognates (e.g., English five, Italian cinque, and Russian pjat) and sound correspondences across
languages, the shapes of the grammatical systems (e.g. how many cases and which ones are found in various languages) and
individual inflectional morphemes, and even word order. It is a powerful theory, and as any powerful tool, it should be wielded
carefully, lest it is distorted beyond recognition and used to justify some vile doctrine.

*Note: the interview is in French, all translations are mine.

Sources:
Baker, Mark (2001) Phrase structure as representation of primitive grammatical relations. In: William Davies & Stan Dubinsky
(eds.) Objects and other subjects: Grammatical functions, functional categories, and configurationality. Dordrecht: Kluwer. Pp. 21-51.
Jones, William (1824) Discourses Delivered before the Asiatic Society: and Miscellaneous Papers, on the Religion, Poetry, Literature,
etc., of the Nations of India. London: C.S. Arnold.
Mallory, James P. (1989) In Search of the Indo-Europeans: Languages, Archaeology and Myth. London: Thames & Hudson.
Mller, Friedrich Max (1887) Biographies of Words and the Home of the Aryas. Reprinted in the Collected Edition of Max Mllers
Works. 1912. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Like this post? Please pass it on:

Tweet

Previous Post
Is There a Language-Area of the Brain?And...

Next Post
Welcome

Related Posts
Ancient DNA and the
Indo-European
Question, Yet Again
Posted on Jun 17, 2015

Paleolithic Continuity
Theory: Assumptions
and Problems
Posted on Apr 2, 2015

Disentangling The
Tangled Roots of
English
Posted on Feb 28, 2015

What is the Homeland

Problem?
Posted on Feb 22, 2015

Subscribe For Updates

We would love to have you back on Languages Of The World in the future. If you would like to receive updates of our
newest posts, feel free to do so using any of your favorite methods below:

Tags
HOMELAND

HOMELAND PROBLEM

INDO-EUROPEAN

JEAN-PAUL DEMOULE

PROTO-INDO-EUROPEAN

ABOUT LANGUAGES OF THE WORLD

This site is a discussion forum dedicated by Asya Pereltsvaig to exploring the rich diversity of human languages and the peoples
who speak them. How does language make us humans what we are? How do we learn language and how do we navigate our
multilingual world? Read more...

BOOKS BY ASYA

The Indo-European Controversy: Facts and Fallacies in Historical Linguistics

Languages Of The World: An Introduction

Copular Sentences In Russian

Learn more about these books

or
See Asya's recommendations

RECENT POSTS

Are Indo-Europeans Untraceable?A Response to Jean-Paul Demoule

Posted on Oct 25, 2015

Is There a Language-Area of the Brain?And Moros Experiments about Real and Fake Italian
Posted on Oct 22, 2015

Using Grammar to Identify Language Relatedness

Posted on Oct 22, 2015

Reconstructing the Lifestyles of Three Pre-Historic Amazonian Tribes

Posted on Oct 7, 2015

Meeting Darwins Last Challenge: Matching Genes, Languages, and Geography (Part 3)
Posted on Oct 4, 2015

POPULAR POSTS

What is the most difficult language to learn and why?

Posted on Jun 3, 2011

Which language is the oldest?

Posted on Apr 22, 2011

What is the Homeland Problem?

Posted on Feb 22, 2015

Language Referendum in Latvia

Posted on Feb 20, 2012

Is the Georgian language related to Basque, another European outlier?

Posted on May 15, 2014

RANDOM POSTS

Syntactic feature or scribal convention?

Posted on Apr 18, 2012

Tracing Indo-European Languages Back to Their SourceThrough the False Mirrors of the Popular Press
Posted on May 24, 2014

Were the Neandertal a symbolic species?

Posted on Oct 18, 2010

Is language a vehicle for happiness?

Posted on Sep 2, 2011

Da-da-da Duh!
Posted on Apr 4, 2011

Archives

Tag Cloud

Archives

American English Chinese dialect

Select Month

endangered languages

English

Finno-Ugric French gender genetics

German Germanic Google Translate

Hebrew Hungarian Icelandic Italian

Jews Latin Old Church Slavonic
Romance

Russian Spanish

student paper translation word order

Want To Advertise On Languages Of The World?

If you have a great product or service you'd like to let our targeted audience know about, you can sponsor the
development of this site with your promotion.
Get in touch to learn more here.

Copyright 2015 LanguagesOfTheWorld.info.

LanguagesOfTheWorld.info All Rights Reserved | Privacy Policy

Site created by K&J Web Productions