Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
of
Protection
Local
and
overseas,
organized
and
The Constitution (In Article XIII, Section 3) provides that the State shall
afford protection to labor, local and overseas, organized and unorganized.
The State shall afford protection to labor by promoting full employment
and equality of employment opportunities for all.
Workers are entitled to security of tenure, humane conditions of work
and a living wage. o The State shall guarantee the right of all workers to self
organization, collective bargaining and negotiations, and peaceful concerted
activities, including the right to strike, in accordance with law.
Workers shall also participate in policy and decision making processes
affecting their rights and benefits as may be provided by law.
The State shall promote the principle of shared responsibility between
workers and employers and the preferential use of voluntary modes in settling
labor disputes, including conciliation, and shall enforce mutual compliance
therewith to foster industrial peace.
The State shall regulate the relations between workers and employers,
recognizing the right of labor to its just share in the fruits of production and
the right of enterprises to reasonable returns on investments, and to expansion
and growth.
relations laws are not mutually exclusive; they are complement to each other.
Thus, the law on strikes and lockouts which is an example of labor relations
law includes some provisions on the security of tenure of workers who go on
strike or who are locked out. These provisions are examples of labor standards
law.
May social justice as a guiding principle in labor law be so used by the courts
in sympathy with the working man if it collides with the equal protection clause
of the Constitution? Explain. 5%
SUGGESTED ANSWER:
Yes. The State is bound under the Constitution to afford full protection to
Labor; and when conflicting interests collide and they are to be weighed on the
scales of social justice, the law should accord more sympathy and compassion
to the less privileged workingman. (Fuentes v. NLRC. 266 SCRA 24 f 19971)
However, it should be borne in mind that social justice ceases to be an effective
instrument for the equalization of the social and economic forces by the State
when it is used to shield wrongdoing. (Corazon Jamer v. NLRC. 278 SCRA 632
F1 99711).
ANOTHER SUGGESTED ANSWER:
No, social justice as a guiding principle in law may not be used by the courts if
it collides with the equal protection clause of the Constitution. Social justice is
not a magic wand applicable in all circumstances. Not all labor cases will be
automatically decided in favor of the worker. Management has also rights which
are entitled to recognition and protection; justice must be dispensed according
to facts and law; and social justice is not designed to destroy or oppress the
employer.
ANOTHER SUGGESTED ANSWER:
Social justice as a guiding principle in Labor Law can be implemented side by
side with the equal protection clause of the Constitution. In implementation of
the principle of social justice, the Constitution commands that the State shall
afford protection to labor. Thus Labor Law may be pro-labor in the sense that
labor is given certain benefits not given to management. But this is not
necessarily violative of the equal protection clause of the Constitution because
said clause allows reasonable classification.