Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
APPROACH
Author: lecturer, PhD. Bran Camelia-Nadia
Aurel Vlaicu University of Arad
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
1.
2.
3.
defines need and promotes the direction of change in pursuit of improved quality of life. As
any change process, it is not without resistance some groups might never agree with the
change or other will take a very long time for understanding and negotiation. Some changes
are reversed or implemented only on the surface if there is not enough support either
sufficient number or influence and commitment of community leadership to back up the
change. (***, 2006)
b) Assisted/facilitated community development: This happens when one or more people
or organizations take on a conscious role to act as agents of change/ development with the
purpose to support a community achieve the 3 results described above.
A community development facilitator/practitioner can play a role in assisting community
development at a number of levels:
Increased awareness of own needs and aspirations (of individuals in the community but with
increased focus on what is common/shared);
Defining the direction for change/agenda for development starting from commonly identified
problems/needs and/or aspirations and resources;
Help mobilize further resources and support for the agreed agenda/course of action;
Support communication and transparency of the process to increase access of community
members so they can participate with own ideas and energy;
Support conflict resolution by mediating agreements or relationships;
Help create new supportive relationships and discover latent resources within the community;
Support community members or leaders to learn from the experience, remain optimistic and
plan for follow up when needed.
Such assistance usually accelerates development processes or mitigates some of the
unwanted consequences of change processes (some people are left behind/excluded,
confusion, discomfort).
If we start from the assumption that development potential is unlimited, so would be even
if assistance programs can take a number of years, the practice has shown a need to split this
process in more manageable units (we will call them cycles) that make sense if taken by
themselves. As the facilitator aims to increase the capacity of the community to generate its
own development rather than create dependency of the facilitator, many times the role the
facilitator will take changes from a cycle to another to allow more responsibility and initiative
being taken at the community level.
Figure no.1 Community development cycle (***, 2006, Overview of community
Follow-up
Define
Define
community
what remains
andtoown
be done
role and
Define
by borders
whomwho
of community and own role/interest;
developmenttraining
material)
Research
EvaluationMonitor progress and involve key sstakeholders in evaluating
success
Learn about interests, assets, people& relationships
Action
Initiate relationship Define key stakeholders & initiate/cultivate relationship; clarify expectations & o
Support implementation of strategy with own skills and community mobilized resources
Both the value and limitation of this framework is that is quite general. This makes it
applicable to wide range of situations facilitators meet in practice, but at the same time it
leaves it at a rather abstract level.
....its applications in practice
There is one major difference in how the process looks like with a specific influence on the
stages in the upper half of the circle, which is given by reactivity/proactivity of the
intervention.
1. Reactive: Facilitator is requested by an organization or group from that community to
support the community development process within a certain framework given by the mission
and interests of that group/organization. In this case, facilitator is reactive to a need/interest as
defined internally by a group within community;
2. Proactive: Facilitator works with an organization/agency outside or inside the
community that has an interest to provide resources (human or a combination) to support the
development of the specific community. We can assimilate here the third option when the
facilitator works independently. In this case, facilitator is proactive on behalf of the
development agency/organization or her/himself.
In reactive interventions, the facilitator will be provided probably a more narrow
framework of what is expected of her/him in the strategy design or action phase. Still, it is a
good idea to try to understand the assignment in the overall framework of the community
agenda as well as the agenda of the organization that requested assistance. The major source
for this information can be the potential contact client, but depending on the assignment the
facilitator might decide to research a bit more before deciding to take on the assignment. In
this case, the requesting organization and facilitator will have to agree on the focus on the
assignment as they see it at this moment.
In proactive interventions, the facilitator enters the community with the framework given
by organization/agency or with own framework of interest if independent. Sometimes, she/he
has a choice over communities to engage with so an initial feasibility stage is carried out
trying to look for those communities where development assistance might be most meaningful
judging from criteria established by organization/agency or by facilitator in case she/he is
independent. In this case, the initial stages take usually longer and the facilitator will have
increased responsibility in the phase of initiating relationship, defining expectations and own
role.
Similarly, in proactive situation, facilitator takes more responsibility with regards to
evaluation and follow up which in the more reactive situations might be shared with the
organization that requested assistance.
Currently the circle is defined more from the perspective of proactive interventions
which is a bit larger/more complex, however most stages have some meaning even if they
receive much less focus in the case of reactive interventions.
1.3.Other influences on community development process
Agency background: Another difference in practice is given by who is the organization
that employs the facilitator, its location and image. In the case of organization without an
image/perception in the community, more responsibility is placed on the facilitator to pass
information about the organization (also for transparency and credibility reasons). For
organizations/agencies with an image in the community (usually from within the community)
it is important for the facilitator to understand to what degree it is seen as
independent/representative of a diversity of community interests or is seen as associated with
a specific group of interests. Facilitator can work and be successful in all these circumstances
however the way it defines community, stakeholders and success might be different from
case to case.
Types of clients and interests: Since assisted/facilitated community development
discusses a helping relationship between community facilitator and supported community,
some understanding of the concept of the client might be important. The concept of main
client refers to individual or group where the facilitator aims to make a change directly and
whose interests it needs to follow. In community development we deal with a multitude of
clients and many times conflicting agendas. Often, the main (and direct) client of community
facilitator is a group of community leaders or for different interventions different sub-groups
of community members, however given the purpose of the intervention she/he needs to
always guard the interests of all community members (end clients). Two other categories of
clients may come to further complicate the picture contact clients (those who call in for
assistance usually to benefit another or at least a wider group) and paying clients.
So unless a community based organization representative of community interests or the
acknowledged leadership groups committed to follow these interests calls and pays for the
service of a facilitator (...and sometimes even in that case), the facilitator needs to understand,
hold and make the best our of a diversity of interests, while slowly selecting and serving
common or complementary interests.
In the case it is not possible to identify the common interests of a certain community this
might be indication that the way the community was defined needs some revision. Maybe
from a whole town or village, you can move to a specific neighborhood or maybe there is a
need for more specificity in defining the key interests of the group (friends of nature from
this city...)
This suggest that the cycle can be used also as a compass of the community development
process highlighting key points where you have been, points you can review or return to if the
journey seems to be loosing meaning.
2. YOUTH PARTICIPATION IN COMMUNYTY DEVELOPMENT
2.1. Forms of youth participation
There are many various forms of youth participation. We mention here only some of them
that were applied in CEE countries. They can be divided according to the way in which youth
may enter the public arena and according to their influence on the final decision:
2.1.1. Public discussion, with no decision-making involved. This is aimed at seeking
public interest in, and awareness of, the connections between the specific interests of
individuals and the common interest of the community.
The aim of public discussion is not joint decision-making. It is more of a process of
discovery, which can lead to better understanding and a change in attitude on the part of
those involved in the discussion. According to Dukes (in 1996), it is a good idea to create
space for public discussion when you want to:
Educate the participating parties and/or the public at large concerning an issue that is
subject to, or connected with, public decision-making;
Discover public interest provide both the decision-maker and the public with an
opportunity to become aware of what is and what is not the public interest in relation to a
given theme, and also to discover fears, differences of opinion, or solutions;
Raise the level of awareness and understanding of specific groups of people
concerning important areas of public policy;
Enable parties to a conflict to understand that, even in the most controversial issues,
people with opposing views may be found with whom it is possible to enter into discussion;
Reduce the risk of violent confrontation;
Figure 2: The five levels of youth influence on public decision-making (World YOUTH
Report,2003)
the time needed to reach a decision
5
4
Legenddddd
the public authorities
citizens
representatives of the public authorities
1
working groups with citizens
mutual interaction
the level of youths influence on decision-making
What are the individual levels of youth influence on public decision-making? What
characterises them, and how do they differ?
1. The authorities make a decision and subsequently provide information
The least time-consuming method is where the authorities make a decision independently
and inform the public afterwards, whether directly (for example, at a public meeting) or
indirectly (through the media).
This approach may be appropriate in a situation where it is important to make a rapid
decision, and the people affected are aware of this; for example, in crisis situations (such as
any type of natural disaster). The authorities may also be able to use such an approach in a
situation where they have the trust and support of the youth (for example, where they allow
youth to influence decision-making in other situations), or if the decision has been preceded
by a wide-ranging discussion and an agreement upon priorities in which youth have
participated. It is important that youth know in advance that a decision is to be made; in this
case, the decision-making process meets the first condition for the decisions acceptance by
the public.
It is particularly inappropriate to use such an approach in situations where it may be
expected that public opinion will be the reverse of that held by the authorities. Furthermore, if
the public is capable of rapid mobilisation, then such a form of decision-making is very
hazardous for the authorities.
2. The authorities make a decision after consultation with individuals
It is a little more time-consuming when the authorities, before making a decision, engage
in consultations with individuals and determine their opinions, whether randomly, or using a
representative sample (which should at least provide an overview of differing interests,
opinions, and other characteristics expressing diversity). This includes all methods of
determining public opinion, such as opinion polls, individual conversations with official and
non-official local authorities and an ascertainment of their opinions, focus groups, and public
discussion (referred to by some writers as a public hearing).
This type of decision-making meets the first two criteria for the decisions acceptance by
the public, which is an improvement over the preceding type.
In this case, the accumulation of public opinions may be perceived merely as a
smokescreen to conceal what is actually the fait accompli approach to decision-making
detailed previously. It is generally very difficult for the public to distinguish whether the
results of research are genuine or have been manipulated, as well as the extent to which these
results have been considered and accepted when approving a decision.
3. The authorities make a decision after consultation with representative groups
Another possible method of decision-making is where the authorities create a committee
for research and the creation of proposals to solve a specific problem or issue. In order that
the public become involved, this committee must include representatives of interested parties
and youth.
We would recommend an approach whereby the committee analyses the problem and
proposes solutions that the authorities subsequently approve, either with a small number of
amendments, or unconditionally. An important condition for the legitimacy of such a process
is that the committee have a representative composition. In the event that a committee is
successfully established from generally respected authorities, reflecting a wide range of
interests on the part of those affected, then this is a process that meets all four criteria for the
decisions acceptance by the public. In this case, it is also important that the decision-making
process be clear and accessible to the public.
Youth committees, which are usually established when decisions are to be made by the
state or local government, have various tasks and roles, and not all of them have a real
influence on decision-making. Sometimes their task is merely to analyse the problem and
monitor attitudes, providing the authorities with simple orientation in the situation. At other
times, committees also provide advice and propose alternatives, from which the authorities
choose the solution to be implemented.
4. The authorities make a decision together with representative groups of individuals
The authorities go a stage further in meeting the criteria for a decisions acceptance by the
public if they become one of the participants an equal partner in the negotiations between
the interested parties. Such an approach is only possible in situations where the state or local
government, along with the other interested parties, begin to understand that none of them
have the power, the necessary mandate, or the resources to solve a common problem alone.
If the interested parties have enough motivation to solve a common problem, then they can
begin to negotiate with each other, which may culminate in active co-operation. The joint
negotiations are then participated in not only by the authorities, but also by the representatives
of non-profit organisations, entrepreneurs, and individual youth. The authorities usually
guarantee the joint agreement, which is binding for both the authorities themselves and the
other parties involved. The latter typically participate in the agreements implementation.
5. The authorities delegate decision-making to others; youth have control over the decision
The last level in participatory decision-making is where the authorities delegate decisionmaking (and sometimes implementation) to an independent group of youth or a civic
organisation. Control is effected either by a group established in a similar way to that seen in
the previous case, or by a non-profit organisation. In this case, it is essential that the
responsible authorities have effective mechanisms at their disposal to monitor the observance
of those conditions and rules that have been delegated, along with the decision-making
competence, to an independent entity. This is especially true in cases where public funds are
used, and in the observance of generally valid legislation. However, the public authorities
should always retain the option to revoke the delegation of competencies in justified
(previously agreed) circumstances.
Table 1: The level of youth /citizens participation in decision making process
THE LEVEL
THE
PROCESS
THE PROCESS ON
THE
PROCESS
OF
JOINT ON THE LEVEL OF THE LEVEL OF THE INVOLVING
THE
DECISIONOFFICIAL
AND CITIZEN
ENTIRE
MAKING
UNOFFICIAL
COMMUNITY
LEADERS
LEADERS
AND
CITIZENS
1. The authorities
make a decision
and subsequently
provide
information
briefings
short
meetings in which the
authorities
provide
brief information on
the decision to invited
leaders
2. The authorities
make a decision
after consultation
with individuals
3. The authorities
make a decision
after consultation
with
representative
groups
expert
advisory
groups
panels and round table
discussions,
conferences
committees
workshops
informal discussions
4. The authorities negotiations
with
make a decision interest groups
together
with mediation
with
representative
interest groups
public meetings
providing information
through
the
media
(newsletters,
press
announcements, press
conferences,
advertisements)
briefings
short
meetings with groups of
citizens
surveys,
listening
projects
public hearings
opinion polls
focus groups
the
collection
of
comments
for
the
authorities (in person,
by telephone, by e-mail)
the organisation of
exhibitions (models and
alternative
plans),
linked to the collection
of observations on the
investment objective
civic advisory groups
local working groups
discussion forums
public hearings
local working/advisory
groups
co-operative planning
with
an
advisory
aspect
citizens juries
co-operative planning
with the power to
make and implement
decisions
groups
individuals
of charrettes (a method
by which all interested
parties, the support of
which is necessary for
a decision to be made,
meet and engage in
continuous
discussions until they
agree)
5. The authorities community
delegate
foundation
grant
decision-making programmes
to others; citizens
have control over
the decision
coordinated by Camelia Bran from Aurel Vlaicu University of Arad. This group carries the
whole process forward. Arads Local Group of Action includes 26 local structures: NGOs,
public authorities, citizens. One or more preliminary meetings provided an opportunity to
organize the process, ensured that it is complete and made sure that the group has taken on
board its role, which was to carry through and co-ordinate the process.
In the light of the principle that the definition of well-being for all must be based on the
way in which citizens themselves see it, the co-ordination group began by organising small,
homogeneous groups of eight to ten people. In Arad we have consulted 20 homogeneous
groups, as shown below: Unskilled workers; Civil servants / Fire fighters; prospective
teachers; Scientists of Education; Employees in the system of social protection / social
assistants; teaching staff; Economists in the social field; Prisoners / Imprisoned; Resident /
non-institutionalized elderly; Institutionalized residents; Doctors; Lawyers; Journalists;
Sportsmen; Higher education students; Psychologists; Cultural actors; Representatives of
non-governmental organizations; Young volunteers; Workers in the prison. Three of these
groups were exclusively represented by youngsters.
These groups were invited to consider the matter individually (by writing "post it" notes)
and then collectively (taking stock of their thoughts together) in the light of three simple and
completely open questions: 1) What do you understand by well-being? 2) What you
understand by ill-being? 3) What do you do to ensure your own well-being? This generated a
large number of highly varied criteria for well-being, put forward by the various groups.
These criteria were then pooled and organised according to the main facets of well-being, so
as
to
produce
a
consolidated,
inclusive
set
of
criteria.
The next stage was to devise indicators for progress/well-being on the basis of the criteria
allocated to each of the indicators identified. Given that a progress indicator must be able to
measure progress between what may be considered a very bad situation and, at the other
extreme, an ideal situation corresponding to the objective to be achieved, progress indicators
are devised in relation to five situations: very bad situation, bad situation, average situation,
good situation and, finally, ideal situation. The five situations thus describe the path to
progress on which local players embark in their efforts to ensure well-being in all its
dimensions.
Following the final processing of all data in the ESPOIR software, a series of graphics of
the statistical results obtained from processing criteria, indicators were generated.
In the table bellow, we have presented the distribution of criteria and indicators families
having the most representative interest for Arad. (Bran, 2013).
Table No.2.Sinthetic representation of indicators
A. Access to the means of life 26,44% A00
Access to the means of life 0.21%
E. Societal Balance 10,12%
NA0- Generally unclassified A 0,63%
E00 Societal Balance 0.21%
A01 Access to food 5.29%
NE0-Generally Unclassified E 0.63%
A02-Acces to Medications and health
E01 Affirmation and transmission of
services 8.88%
identity and values 8.25 %
A03 Home/interior comfort 6.98%
E02 Courtesy, respect and tolerance
A04 Clothing 0%
5.8%
A05- Education/Training 5.29%
E03 Solidarity, knowledge and
A06 Access to a job 10.36%
resources sharing and transmission 4.44%
A07 leisure, culture, sport 6,13%
E04 Social Mixed
A08 purchasing power/access to
/Segregation 0.85%
finance 47.57%
E05 Economic Balance 1.9%
A09 help and personalized services
E06 Demographic Balance 0%
4.02%
A10 Mobility 2,33
A11 Access to information/ 2.33%
B. Environment 3,69%
B00 General Environment 0.42 %
NB0 -Generally Unclassified B 0.21%
B01 Sanitation/Pollution/Noise 3.38%
B02 Basic infrastructure 5.92%
B03 -Services and trade structures 0.63%
B04- Places for meeting and leisure
2.75%
B05 Weather, natural phenomena 0%B06- Landscape 0.63%
B07 Production conditions 0%
C. Relations with and between
organizations 12,19%
C00
Relations with and between
organizations 0.21%
NC0 Generally Unclassified C 0%
C01 Fundamental rights/Recognition
1.9%
C02 Functioning of Justice 7.82%
C03- Democracy
C04 Transparency/communication
4.65%
C05 Organization, management,
financing 24.74%
C06 Access, information, contacts with
organizations 0.63%
Figure no. 3- The distribution of the citizens answer within the eight families of indicators
Accordingly, for general distribution of data, we can say that the idea of the good life, in
Arad binds to (1) resources on means of life and (2) attitudes and initiatives, both in
perspective. With other words, within the community of Arad there is a lack of means of life
and civic attitudes and initiatives.
We have gone deeper with this analysis by following the same distributions of the answers
provided by the citizens for those 3 questions
For the 3 questions mentioned above, it was observed a significant differences between
distributions of the criteria on the 8 families and on the 4 categories. Thus, under the first piechart, referring on what constitutes a good life, the answers were mainly related to the access
to the means of life, followed by personal balance and then social balance. The answers
were included mainly in the catheogory of btaining, meaning that there is a lack or a poor
level of resources referring to personal and social balance. Other indicators were mentioned
especially in terms of quality.(eg. Education,environment).
Figure no.4 The distribution of the citizens answers for the question:What does it mean
to have a good life?
Analysis of responses relative to the hindrances in having a good life brought into question
the critical relationships with the public organizations from Arad. The most commonly
reported phenomena were corruption and bureaucracy. The second place was occupied by the
acces to the means of life followed by the social balance and personal balance. Also
focused significantly toward obtaining category, a significant proportion of responses were
included in the category of exclusion referring to the blocked access to the means to ensure
a good living. Thus, the citizens of Arad consider that having a good life is hindered by the
mal-functioning of the public institutions.
The insufficiency of the means of life and the unbalanced social life are considered the 2 nd
and 3rd factor that prevent the citizens of Arad of having a good life.(figure no.5)
Figure no.5The distribution of the citizens answers for the question:What prevent you to
have a good life?
Lastly, in respect of the third question, it was highlighted the segment of attitudes and
initiatives, mainly from the perspective of quality. The citizens of Arad believed, that there
are not enough initiatives for improving ones well-being. The existing ones require a higher
quality.(figure no.6).
Figure no.6.The distribution of the citizens answers for the question : What can you do to
have a good life?
Within the second series of Statistics,(figure no.7) we have conducted a differentiation
between families of indicators and the categories on investigated groups. Thus, for Arad, in
first graph we can see the dominant presence of family-life means (red) and H-attitudes
(orange) for all groups except the investigated Group Sportsmen and Psychologists for whom
the personal balance is more important. Within the group civil servants in special regime, in
addition to the two families of the above-mentioned indicators, it appeared with about the
same weight the family of indicators referring to the Relationships with and among
organizations. Within the group of Prison Workers there was relatively equal proportion
between access to the means of life, attitudes and initiatives and social balance
followed closely by Relationships with and among organizations. For the group of
institutionalized retirees it was very important the personal balance, particularly keeping
ties with family. Lawyers and journalists are primarily concerned with Relations with and
between organizations, then the attitudes and personal and community initiatives,
access to the means of life hovering in 3rd place. It seems to be a strong correlation
between occupational groups and the preference for one or other of the families.
1.
2.
3.
4.
We can observe that for the three groups of youngsters (Ngo representatives, Students,
Volunteers) the criteria most prevalent were: Access to means of life and Attitude and
Initiatives. The youngsters from Arad are concerned with assuring their basic needs as
money, food, furniture etc but also they are involved themselves in many civic initiatives.
The second right bar-graph shows the distribution of categories for analyzed groups. We
can observe the clear domination of the categories obtaining and quality. For the
following groups: prison workers and representatives of NGO half of the responses aimed at
quality. In other words, for these 2 groups the idea of good living linked to the quality of
certain existing landmarks. Even if the exclusion has fairly small weights in the responses
of groups, it was interesting to found that prison workers identified more things that block
their access to a good life than the detainees. These two groups together with lawyers had the
highest scores for exclusion. At the opposite pole were un-institutionalized pensioners..
Paradoxically, people with limited access to the means of life have identified fewer things that
blocks their access to a better life compared to groups considered "privileged".
In order to have a more representative diagnosis of well-being in Arad, a questionnaire
based on the ESPOIR five dimensions outcomes (very bad situation, bad situation, average
situation, good situation, and sustainable situation) should be applied on a statistically
representative sample.
The process of defining well-being indicators in Arad was followed by the co evaluation of
the existing 15 local initiatives from the point of view of their impact on the 59 indicators. A
Local Plan of Action was set up containing more than 10 action proposals for increasing the
citizens well-being.
3.2.The development of Local Action Plan of Arad Municipality
For the development of the Local Plan of Action, 4 general directions of action were
selected. The choice of the directions carried out was based on the primary analysis of the
indicators of wellbeing, choosing the indicators with the greatest number of expressed criteria,
as well as the indicators for which a reduced number of criteria of wellbeing was expressed,
as follows: (Bran, C., Racotea, R., 2012)
Environment
Entrepreneurship
Social Inclusion/Networks of Social Inclusion
Democracy, institutions, social morals
For each direction of development, were chosen a number of projects/local actions/ which
Co-are evaluated, based on the grid with the indicators of wellbeing. In the municipality of
Arad, 15 projects. were co-evaluated based on the indicators of wellbeing.
Table no.3 Proposals the Local Action Plan of Arad
Directi
Actions
Who?
How?
When?:
on
D.I.M
Contest
of Local Police force Consultation of Internet site Autumn
development
of Arad Pupils fro of the Local Police force of 2012
flyers for the Local Arad high schools
Arad by the pupils
Police force Arad
The Arad County Lansing the flyers design
School inspectorate contest
Uploading the proposal of
flyers on the Local Police
site;
Online voting
Publishing of the winner
flyer
The winning ceremony
D.I.M.
Enviro
nneme
nt
RIS
The
campagne The Local Agency
Stop the new for
Community
drugs consume
development
and
assistance
Antidrogue
Association of Arad
The Local Police
force
The
maximum
Security jail of
Arad?
Educatio
Association
Volunteers
The
Orthodox
archibishopric of Arad
Personal
Higher education
development
students studying
Workshops for the Psychology
from
college pupils
two
local
universities
The
Orthodox
archibishopric of Arad
College pupils
volunteers
Children
from
placement Centers
The Arad County
School inspectorate
2012-2013
Psychology students will
direct the activities in the
classrooms and in other notconventional spaces. They
have worked with the college
pupils
and
the
institutionalized
children.
The activities aimed at the
stimulation of the selfknowledge
and
the
knowledge of the colleagues,
the development of the
capacity of communication,
assertivity, creativity, etc The
beneficiary could become
further multipliers.
Colors
and Disadvantaged
Painting the walls, in order to 2013
smiles
people,
young embellish the places in which
people that lacks the the waste is collected. .
means of expression
and pupils of the
College of Art from
Arad
NGO+EURAR+ The Local Agency
September
Public Institutions for
Community Interactive presentations of 2012
Fair
development
and organizationsactivities (for
assistance
example the organizations
NGOs from Arad + responsible for tax collection
Public Institutions could bring official templates
The
Orthodox and teach people how to
archifulfil them.
bishopric of Arad
RIS
Arad
catalogue
NGOs
The
little The kindergartens
Entrepreneur
from Arad
Aurel
Vlaicu
University of Arad
National Council of
Small and Medium
sized
Private
Enterprises
of
Romania _
2012-2013
RIS
I
have
succeeded . Have
you?
2013
RIS
Helping
the
beggars around the
churches
RIS
DIM
Forum Theater
2012-2013
2013
2013
RIS
Photovoice
Local Group of
Action unprivileged
youngsters
Aurel
Vlaicu
University of Arad,
Local group orf
Action, important
stakeholders active
in the environment
issues.
the youngsters
The
people
of
the
underprivileged groups will
receive a camera and they
will
capture
the
instantaneous ones of their
life. The photos will be
exposed on a public space..
Local
important
stakeholders were invited to
Aurel Vlaicu University of
Arad. the organization of the
activity was the cafe, as a
space of free expression of
solutions
for
the
environmental problems
2012
2013
The target group was represented by the youngsters with talent in painting belonging to
both normal and disadvantaged social groups.
Results 105 youngsters were involved in painting 10 spaces around the garbage collection
points.
Indirect beneficiaries of the project were the citizens of Arad . It was intended to attract a
large number of people in its support. Concrete results were known by the inhabitants. Arad
inhabitants were thrilled by the children action. Volunteers have adhered to the project.
Citizens helped in painting, companies provided water, food, sweets for the children, public
authorities have cooperated for a smooth implementation of the project and a national
producer of paint POlicolor is sponsoring the painting of 10 more places. So we can affirm
that the Colors and smiles have succeeded to create synergy of action in Arad community.
3.4. Main benefits for the local development after the implementation of the SPIRAL
methodology in Arad.
It has been created the frame for better knowledge of the local stakeholderds involved in the
field of social inclusion of youth
developing joint projects, increased the level of trust between the various community
stakeholders
commonly shared resources
increased participation of youth and other social categories to the community life and projects
design response actions at the local level based on an actual identification of the needs of
residents
integrate members of the Local Group of Action in a national network
access to information on examples of good practice in the field of social inclusion
References:
Bran, C., (2012), Characteristics of well-being indicators developed by Arads citizens in
Journal Plus Education, Volume VIII, no.2, ISSN: 1842-077X, E-ISSN (online) 2068 1151,
Vol VIII (2012), No. 2, pp 246 - 254
Bran,C., Racotea, R (2013), Arad territoire de coresponsabilit, Educaia-Plus Journal Plus
Education 1842-077X, E-ISSN (online) 2068 1151 Vol X (2013), pp.178-84
Cook, James B. (1994),. Community Development Theory. MP568, Reviewed October 1994
University of Missouri Extension, Columbia, MO.
Dukes, E. F.,(1996), Resolving Public Conflict: Transforming Community and Governance,
Manchester University Press
European Commission, (2001), European Commission White Paper: A New Impetus for
European Youth (Brussels, 21 November 2001)
European Committee For Social Cohesion (CDCS), (2010), Draft New Strategy for Social
Cohesion, Report Of The 23rd Meeting, Strasbourg, 24-25 February, pp.13-18
Ferguson, R. F., Dickens, W.T. (ed.): (1999), Urban Problems and Community Development,
Brookings Institution Press, Washington, D.C.,
Hopkins A. W.: Groundswell, (2005), Stories of Saving Places, Finding Community, The
Trust for Public Land
Johanisova, N.:(2005), Living in the Crack, A Look at Rural Social Enterprises in Britain
and the Czech republic, The Foundation for the Economics of Sustainability, Dublin
Nadolu, B., (2011), Itinerarii n metodologia SPIRAL: de la realitatea post-it-urilor la
postarea realitii, in Rolul Dialogului Social n Dezvoltarea Incluziunii Sociale Active.
Newsletter
nr.
5
(oct.
dec.
2011),
available
at
http://dialogsocial.cries.ro/newslettere/#content_211
National Civic League (1997). The Community Visioning and Strategic Planning Handbook,
The NCL Press,
Potapchuk, W. R.; Crocker J. P. (1998). Assessing Civic Capacity and Building Civic CapitalDraft, PCPS
Potapchuk, W. R.; Crocker, J. P.; Boogaard;, D.; Schechter, W. H. (1998). Building
Community, Exploring the Role of Social Capital and Local Government, Program for
Community Problem Solving
Tolman, J., Pittman, K., Cervone, B. and others, (2001), Youth Acts, Community Impacts:
Stories of Youth Engagement with Real Impacts, Community and Youth Development
Series, vol. 7 (Takoma Park),Maryland, Forum for Youth Investment
World YOUTH Report,( 2003), Youth Participation in Decision-making, available at
http://www.un.org/esa/socdev/unyin/documents/ch10.pdf
*** (2006), Summer School on Community Development Bulgaria 2006 , 917 September
developed within the project: Networking Programme Civil Society Component Bulgaria
and Romania Dialogue on community development: discourse and practice in CEE,
training materials
***, (2009), Developping and using the well-being indicators with citizens and communities,
www.https://spiral.cws.coe.int/tiki-index.php?
page=The+method+proposed+by+the+Council+of+Europe