Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Unemployment
India as a nation is faced with massive problem of unemployment.
Unemployment can be defined as a state of worklessness for a man fit and
willing to work. It is a condition of involuntary and not voluntary idleness.
Some features of unemployment have been identified as follows:
2007 61 37 55
Number of Health Care Workers
Male Female
Education is the most powerful weapon which you can use to change the world.
Nelson Mandela
India’s greatest wealth lies in its human resources. Universal schooling of decent quality
could be the single biggest move it makes towards future prosperity. Towards this end the
Government has come up with Right to Education Bill which promises free education for
every child in the 6-14 age- group. Education requires substantative not just symbolic
action. Merely passing laws without sustained political attention that plugs financial and
administrative gaps in the school sector is going to fail. One of the problems of taking a
purely legislative view is to define who will be held responsible if a child doesn’t attend
school.
A related problem is to set out clearly who will pick up the bill for universal
education, estimated to cost Rs 55,000 crore a year to implement. It is
supposed to split between the centre and states but the precise arrangement is
yet to be known. The most controversial provision of the Bill is to drag the
private sector in by imposing an obligation on private schools to take in at least
25% of its students of its students from disadvantaged backgrounds. Their fees
will supposedly be paid by the government, a promise it’s unlikely to keep.
Providing free education for all should be unambiguously the government’s
responsibility. Countries haven’t made rapid strides towards universal literacy
by palming off the responsibility on the private sector. That will stunt the
growth of the private sector rather than lead to universal literacy.
Alcoholism
• Growing India: India is the world's second most populous country and is
expected to be the most populous by 2040.The country is undergoing the same
forces of demographic transition that have been experienced elsewhere, only
delayed by few decades.
• Young India: Over 700 million Indians are below 35 years of age and
over 550 million are below 25.However despite its youthful population, India's
size means that it is home to the second largest number of older people in the
world, in absolute terms.
Literacy in India
Dowry is derived from the ancient Hindu customs of "kanyadan" and "stridhan". In
"kanyadan", the father of the bride offers the father of the groom money or property, etc.
whereas for "stridhan", the bride herself gets jewelry and clothes at the time of her
marriage, usually from her relatives or friends. In "varadakshina", the father of the bride
presents the groom cash or kind. All of these could be done voluntarily and out of affection
and love.
The dowry custom continues to rule society. In majority of Indian families the
boy has inheritance rights while the girl is given a hefty sum at the time of her
marriage in lieu of the Government regulated equal rights for girls in parental
property. The evil of the dowry system has spread its tentacles in almost all
parts of the country and sections of society. There are several reasons for the
prevalence of the dowry system, but the main one is that it is a necessary
precondition for marriage. "No dowry, no marriage," is a widespread fear.
There has also been an emergence of a feudal mindset with a materialistic
attitude in a new globalized economy. The price tag for the groom is now
bigger and bolder. The emergence of an affluent middle class, the torchbearer
of social change in modern India, is the main factor for the perpetuation of the
dowry system. Families arrange most marriages, and a man who does not
marry for love learns he can marry for possessions. For this man, and his
family, a woman becomes the ticket to shortcut riches through the system of
dowry. There are a number of things people desire to have in their own houses
but cannot afford; they use the opportunity of a son's marriage to get them.
The girl's parents do not protest against the blatant extravaganza, as they
regard the alliance as a stepping-stone towards higher social status and better
matches for the remaining children. Dowry as a phenomenon has gone beyond
the ritual of marriage. Pregnancy, childbirth and all kinds of religious and
family functions are occasions when such demands are made. A more
sophisticated public image of an extended gifting session has replaced the old
system. Now there is demand for receptions in marriage palaces. The
trousseau includes designer wear for the bride and groom's family. Chefs are
flown in for multi-cuisine wedding dinners. The bride's family usually pays for
all this. The rich revel in the exchange of their black money, but this in turn
exerts pressure on the other classes to ape them with serious social
consequences. The women have become a kind of commodity. It is them who
are the worst sufferers because dowry is most often a monetary agreement
between two men - the bride's father and the groom. Caste-based practices
have only added fuel to the fire. Marriages in political families are arranged to
consolidate the caste base for support in electoral politics, so they do not
challenge the dowry system. Dowry rituals have now spread even to
communities where they were unknown. It has gone to different castes,
crossed the boundaries of provinces and education and religion. Muslims and
Christians, such as the Syrian Christians of Kerala and the Roman Catholics of
Mangalore have started demanding dowry.
Official statistics show a steady rise in dowry crimes. More than 9, 5000
women are killed every year in India over dowry. Bihar and Uttar Pradesh still
record the maximum number of dowry crimes, but Bangalore, India's fastest
growing city also shows an alarming rise - four women reportedly die every
day because of dowry harassment and domestic violence. The cases of dowry
torture are the highest accounting for 32.4% of crimes against women in the
country.
The Dowry Prohibition Act, in force since 1st July 1961, was passed with the
purpose of prohibiting the demanding, giving and taking of dowry. In 1980 the
Government set up a committee which recommended amendments in the
Dowry Prohibition Act and also suggested expanding the definition of dowry
and instituting family courts and National Commission for women. Many
parliamentary debates led to some amendments in 1983,1984 and 1986.To
stop the offences of cruelty by husband or his relatives on the wife, Section
498-A was added in the Indian Penal Code and Section 198-A in the Criminal
Procedure Code in the year 1983. The Dowry Prohibition Act clearly
stipulates that a person who gives or takes or helps in the giving or
taking of dowry can be sentenced to jail for 5 years and fined Rs.15,
000/- or the amount of the value of dowry, whichever is more. The Act also
prohibits the giving and taking directly or indirectly any property or valuable
security, any amount either in cash of kind, jewelry, articles, properties, etc. in
respect of a marriage. The control is provided by stating a limit and names of
gifters and their relationship to the married couple to be signed by both sides
of parents. In 1986, the Act was amended again, empowering State
governments to appoint Dowry Prohibition Officers, who not only had a
preventive role but also had powers to collect evidence against people who
took dowry.
Domestic Violence
"…the wife: however brutal or tyrant she may unfortunately be chained to-
though she may know that he hates her, though it may be his daily pleasure to
torture her, and though she may feel it impossible not to loathe him- (he)can
claim from her and enforce the lowest degration of a human being ,that of
being made an instrument of an animal function contrary to her inclinations."
John Stuart Mill
The above lines reflect the brutality that one out of
every three women has to face at the hands of their
husbands, fathers, brothers and uncles in their homes
around the globe. Domestic violence can be described as when one adult in a
relationship misuses power to control another. It is the establishment of
control and fear in the relationship through violence and other forms of abuse.
It is basically an abuse of power. The abuser tortures and controls the victim
by calculated threats, intimidation and physical violence. Although men,
women and children can all be abused, in most cases the victims are women.
In every country where reliable, large-scale studies have been conducted,
results indicate that between 16 and 52% of women have been assaulted by
their husbands\partners. These studies also indicate widespread violence
against women as an important cause of morbidity and mortality. These
physical attacks may also include rape and sexual violence. Psychological
violence includes verbal abuse, harassment, confinement and deprivation of
physical, financial and personal resources. For some women emotional abuse
may be more painful than the physical attacks because they effectively
undermine women's security and self-confidence.
Violence within the home is universal across culture, religion, class and
ethnicity. The abuse is generally condoned by social custom and considered
part and parcel of marital life .An example of this can be seen through the gist
of a popular Spanish riddle: Question: What do mules and women have in
common? Answer: A good beating makes them both better."
The statistics reveal grim picture of the realities prevalent in
developing and developed countries alike.
In the United States a women is beaten every 18 minutes; between 3 million and 4
million are battered each year, but only 1 in 10 cases of domestic violence is ever reported.
In the United Kingdom, 1 in 3 families is a victim of assault and 1 in 5 a victim of
serious assault, according to a recent report by the home office.
In Austria, in 59%of 1500 divorce cases, domestic violence is cited as a cause in the
marital breakdown.
In India the records of National Crimes Bureau, Ministry of Home Affairs government of
India revealed a shocking 71.5% Increase in cases of torture and dowry deaths during the
period from 1991 to 1995 .In 1995, torture of women constituted 29.2%of all reported
crimes against women.
In Bangladesh, half of the 170 reported cases of women murdered between 1983 and
1985 took place within the confines of the homes.
The question arises why women put up with the abuse in the home? The
answer lies in their unequal status in society. They are often caught in a
vicious circle of economic dependence, fear for their children's lives as well as
their own, ignorance of their rights before the law, lack of confidence in
themselves and social pressures. These factors effectively force women to a life
of recurrent mistreatment from which they often do not have the means to
escape. The sanctity of privacy within the family also makes authorities
reluctant to intervene, often leads women to deny they are being abused. This
is equally common in the higher as well as in the lower segments of a society.
A woman who files a charge of abuse is often forced to drop it by her
husband's family if she wants an uncontested divorce. Social prejudices
reinforce domestic violence against women. They are treated as their spouses'
property; husbands assume that this subordinate role gives them right to
abuse their wives in order to keep them in their place. Against this background
is the tradition of dowry, an expectation of gifts and cash from the bride's
family, one can imagine the anxiety these expectations may cause to a woman
and the consequences she has to face if it is inadequate. Women's physical and
mental health is often permanently damaged or impaired and in some cases
violence can have fatal consequences as in the case of dowry deaths in India.
Physical torture as well as mental torture usually occurs on a regular basis
causing suffering and inflicting deep scars on the psyche of the victims and
their families. Many assault incidents result in injuries ranging from bruises and
fractures to chronic disabilities. Domestic violence has devastating
repercussions on the family. Mothers are unable to care for their children
properly. Often they transmit to them their own feelings of low self-esteem,
helplessness and inadequacy. Violence against women is the most pervasive
human rights violation in world today. We need to think and ponder as how
this form of degradation of women can be stopped. It needs support from all
quarters be it government, NGOs and women themselves. There is also a need
to improve women's economic capacities that include access to and control of
income and assets and also share in the family's property. The government
should strengthen and expand training and sensitization programs.
Subscribe to indiancorruption
Origin of all the reasons behind the worst Indian situations is nothing but the
collective inability to make right decisions by the Indian masses; corruption,
injustice, corrupt leadership, corrupt judges, corrupt bureaucrats, etc. all are the
offspring of this.
From The Economist (9th Oct 2003) an article on the perceived corruption of countries.
Finland remains the least-corrupt country in the world, according to the latest annual
index compiled by Transparency International, a Berlin-based organisation. The index,
which measures perceived levels of corruption, focuses on the misuse of public office for
private gain. The United States ranks as the 18th least-corrupt country, only a little less so
than Chile. Botswana is reckoned to be less corrupt than Italy.
India ranks 83 in the list of least-corrupt countries. Finland is the least corrupt and ranks
first; Singapore is fifth; Botswana is ranked 30th — thus leading India by about 50
places.
In the Indian neighborhood, there are no clean countries. On a scale where 10 is the
cleanest, India gets a score of 2.8 (with a standard deviation of 0.4, a fairly low standard
deviation.) Compared to that, China scores marginally higher at 3.5 but has a greater
standard deviation of 1.0 and therefore the estimated error is larger.
The Islamic Republic of Pakistan and the Islamic Republic of Bangladesh both score —
surprise, surprise — lower than India. Pakistan gets a 2.5 with a large 0.9 standard
deviation, and Bangladesh has the dubious distinction of being the least uncorrupt
country of the 133 surveyed by Transparency International and has a score of 1.3 (std
deviation 0.7).
I suppose if Sri Lanka were in that list, it would get a higher score than India. And I also
suppose that the northern states of India (UP, Bihar, etc.) would be more found to be
more corrupt than the southern states (Kerala, AP, TN).
In India, the web of corruption probably has a bureaucratic core. A vast bureaucracy that
is instituted to control every aspect of economic life creates the incentives for individual
and institutionalized corruption. Then the “democratic” political system uses that
bureaucracy to extract rents that are used for fueling the vast political machinery.
Dismantling the bureaucracy would be the first step to fixing the problem of corruption in
India, followed by reduction of the public sector. This would lead to reduced rents that
political parties could extract through the bureaucratic machinery and have the salutary
effect of getting rent-seeking thugs out of the political system in India.