LOPEZ NATIONAL COMPREHENSIVE HIGH SCHOOL

Lopez, Quezon

Component
Proposal overview

Justification for
hypotheses

Supporting
evidence
Review of relevant
research

Maintains
purpose/focus

Methodology

Fully met (4)

Effectively and insightfully
develops a set of testable,
supportable and impactful
study hypotheses.
The introduction section
provides a cogent overview
of conceptual and
theoretical issues related to
the study hypotheses.
Demonstrates outstanding
critical thinking.
Provides clearly
appropriate evidence to
support position
Sophisticated integration,
synthesis, and critique of
literature from related
fields. Places work within
larger context.
The proposal is well
organized and has a tight
and cohesive focus that is
integrated throughout the
document
Identifies appropriate

ICT PROJECT RUBRICS

TEST II (items 26-40)
Met (3)
Partially Met (2)
Develops a set of testable
Develops hypotheses.
and supportable
hypotheses.
The proposal provides
weak support for study
hypotheses. Provides
some evidence of
sound critical thinking.

Not met (1)

Hypotheses are not
testable or justifiable.

The introduction section

provides a logical overview
of conceptual and
theoretical issues related to
the study hypotheses.
Demonstrates competent
critical thinking.
Provides adequate
evidence to support
position
Provides a meaningful
summary of the literature.
Shows understanding of
relevant literature

Very little support for

the conceptual and
theoretical relevant to
the study hypotheses
was provided. Provides
little evidence of sound
critical thinking.
Provides little or no
evidence to support
position
Provides little or no
relevant scholarship.

Provides inappropriate
or insufficient evidence
to support position
Fails to cite important or
relevant scholarship.
Misinterprets research
findings.

The proposal has an

organizational structure and
the focus is clear
throughout.

The proposal is
somewhat focused or
has minor drifts in the
focus.

The document lacks

focus or contains major
drifts in focus

Identifies appropriate

Identifies appropriate

The methodologies

Score

Sample
Procedures
Measures
Data analytic
plan

Grammar, clarity,
and organization

References and
citations

methodologies and
research techniques (e.g.,
justifies the sample,
procedures, and
measures). Data analytic
plan is suitable to test study
hypotheses. Provides
appropriate justification for
controls. Project is feasible
The manuscript is well
written and ideas are well
developed and explained.
Sentences and paragraphs
are grammatically correct.
Uses subheadings
appropriately.
Properly and explicitly
cited. Reference list
matches citations

General recommendations:

Point System:
Test II total points = 15 points

methodologies and
research techniques but
some details are missing or
vague.

methodologies and
research techniques but
many details are
missing or vague. The
methodology is largely
incomplete.

described are either not

suited or poorly suited
to test hypotheses. The
methodology is underdeveloped and/or is not
feasible.

The manuscript effectively

communicates ideas. The
writing is grammatically
correct, but some sections
lack clarity.

The manuscript
communicates ideas
adequately. The
manuscript contains
some grammatical
errors. Many sections
lack clarity.
The manuscript has
several instances of
improper use of
citations. Contains
several statements
without appropriately
citing.

The manuscript is
poorly written and
confusing. Ideas are not
communicated
effectively.

Properly cited. May have a

few instances in which
proper citations are
missing.

The manuscript lacks

proper citations or
includes no citations.

Highest possible points for rubrics = 24pts

(Total score / highest possible points for rubrics) X Test II total points = score

Thesis and Dissertation Defense Evaluation Rubric

Component
Thesis/disserta
tion overview

Justification for
hypotheses

Supporting
evidence

Review of
relevant
research

Fully met (3)

Effectively and
insightfully develops a
set of testable,
supportable and
impactful study
hypotheses. In
general the document
is well organized and
maintains a tightly
integrated focus
throughout the
manuscript.
The introduction
section provides a
cogent overview of
conceptual and
theoretical issues
related to the study
hypotheses.
Demonstrates
outstanding critical
thinking.
Provides clearly
appropriate evidence
to support position

Met (2)
Develops a set of
testable and
supportable
hypotheses. The
manuscript is nicely
organized and the
focus of the
manuscript is
generally maintained
throughout the
document.

Partially Met (1)

Develops
hypotheses. The
manuscript lacks a
clear
organizational
structure and
cohesive focus;
some sections are
clearly organized
and focused and
others are not.

Not met (0)

Hypotheses are
not testable or
justifiable. Focus
of the manuscript
is hard to follow;
lacks
organizational
structure.

The introduction
section provides a
logical overview of
conceptual and
theoretical issues
related to the study
hypotheses.
Demonstrates
competent critical
thinking.
Provides adequate
evidence to support
position

The proposal
provides weak
support for study
hypotheses.
Provides some
evidence of sound
critical thinking.

Very little support

for the conceptual
and theoretical
relevant to the
study hypotheses
was provided.
Provides little
evidence of sound
critical thinking.
Provides little or
no evidence to
support position

Sophisticated
integration, synthesis,
and critique of
literature from related

Provides a
meaningful summary
of the literature.
Shows

Provides
inappropriate or
insufficient
evidence to
support position
Fails to cite
important or
relevant
scholarship.

Provides little or
no relevant
scholarship.

Score

Maintains
purpose/focus

Methodology
Sample
Procedure
s
Measures
Data
analytic
plan

Results section

fields. Places work

within larger context.
The proposal is well
organized and has a
tight and cohesive
focus that is
integrated throughout
the document
Identifies appropriate
methodologies and
research techniques
(e.g., justifies the
sample, procedures,
and measures). Data
analytic plan is
suitable to test study
hypotheses. Provides
appropriate
justification for
controls. Project is
feasible
The results clearly
align with study
hypotheses and the
data analytic plan.
Tables are well
integrated and
discussed in the
section. Controls and
preliminary analyses
are well explained and
justified. The
statistical results are
discussed in a

understanding of
relevant literature
The proposal has an
organizational
structure and the
focus is clear
throughout.

Misinterprets
research findings.
The proposal is
somewhat focused
or has minor drifts
in the focus.

The document
lacks focus or
contains major
drifts in focus

Identifies
appropriate
methodologies and
research techniques
but some details are
missing or vague.

Identifies
appropriate
methodologies
and research
techniques but
many details are
missing or vague.
The methodology
is largely
incomplete.

The
methodologies
described are
either not suited
or poorly suited to
test hypotheses.
The methodology
is under-developed
and/or is not
feasible.

The results
discussed are
consistent with
hypotheses and the
data analytic plan.
Tables are somewhat
integrated and
discussed in the
section. Adequate
justification of
preliminary analyses
and statistical
controls. The

The results section

is under
developed. Results
section is
incomplete in that
tables are
somewhat
integrated, or
preliminary
analyses and
statistical controls
are not justified.
Results are not

The statistics used

are inappropriate
to test study
hypotheses. Or,
results are
discussed
incorrectly or
inappropriately.
There is not a
good
correspondence
between the
tables and the

sophisticated and
accurate way.
Discussion
section

Grammar,
clarity, and
organization

References and
citations

Provides a
sophisticated
integration of the
findings within the
extant literature.
Clarifies how the
findings and research
hypotheses advance
the field. Addresses
strengths,
weaknesses, and
limitations of the
current study
accurately and
insightfully.
The manuscript is well
written and ideas are
well developed and
explained. Sentences
and paragraphs are
grammatically correct.
Uses subheadings
appropriately.
Properly and explicitly
cited. Reference list
matches citations

statistical results are

discussed
adequately.
Adequately
integrates the
findings within the
extant literature.
Addresses how the
findings and
research hypotheses
advance the field.
Attends to issues of
strengths,
weaknesses, and
limitations of the
current study.

The manuscript
effectively
communicates ideas.
The writing is
grammatically
correct, but some
sections lack clarity.

Properly cited. May

have a few instances
in which proper
citations are missing.

always described
accurately.

written document.

The integration of
the findings within
the extant
literature is
superficial or
incomplete. Poorly
justifies the
strengths,
weaknesses, and
limitations of the
current study.

No integration of
the findings within
the extant
literature. Fails to
attend to issues of
generalizability or
design strengths
and weaknesses.

The manuscript
communicates
ideas adequately.
The manuscript
contains some
grammatical
errors. Many
sections lack
clarity.
The manuscript
has several
instances of
improper use of
citations. Contains
several
statements

The manuscript is
poorly written and
confusing. Ideas
are not
communicated
effectively.

The manuscript
lacks proper
citations or
includes no
citations.

Responsive to
prior feedback

Highly responsive to
previous feedback
from faculty. Feedback
is well integrated into
the current document.

Largely responsive
to previous feedback
from faculty.
Feedback is
somewhat
integrated into the
current document.
General recommendations for the thesis /dissertation defense:

without
appropriately
citing.
Somewhat
responsive to
previous feedback
from faculty.

Highly
unresponsive to
previous feedback
from faculty.

Qualifying Exam Rubric: Pre-oral exam evaluation of the written document

Component
Biological bases of
psychology

Fully met (3)

Effectively and
insightfully answers
the exam question.
Provides scientific
evidence to support
conclusions and
provides a thoughtful,
rich, astute answer
that is consistent with
and or extends
existing empirical and
theoretical work.

Social bases of
psychology

Effectively and
insightfully answers
the exam question.
Provides scientific
evidence to support
conclusions and
provides a thoughtful,
rich, astute answer
that is consistent with
and or extends
existing empirical and
theoretical work.

Cognitive-affective
bases of
psychology

Effectively and
insightfully answers
the exam question.
Provides scientific
evidence to support

Met (2)
Provides a solid
answer to the
question. Presents
good scientific
evidence to support
conclusions,
although may have
missed a few
relevant citations.
The answer is
clearly represents
the empirical and
theoretical work.
Provides a solid
answer to the
question. Presents
good scientific
evidence to support
conclusions,
although may have
missed a few
relevant citations.
The answer is
clearly represents
the empirical and
theoretical work.
Provides a solid
answer to the
question. Presents
good scientific
evidence to support

Partially Met (1)

Answers the
question, but the
answer lacks
depth and a clear
integration of
existing research
and theory. Some
sections are
clearly organized
and focused and
others are not.

Not met (0)

Question is not
answered. The
answer is
superficial and
lacks any clear
demonstration of
an understanding
of the conceptual
issues the
question
addressed.

Answers the
question, but the
answer lacks
depth and a clear
integration of
existing research
and theory. Some
sections are
clearly organized
and focused and
others are not.

Question is not
answered. The
answer is
superficial and
lacks any clear
demonstration of
an understanding
of the conceptual
issues the
question
addressed.

Answers the
question, but the
answer lacks
depth and a clear
integration of

Question is not
answered. The
answer is
superficial and
lacks any clear

Score

conclusions and
provides a thoughtful,
rich, astute answer
that is consistent with
and or extends
existing empirical and
theoretical work.

conclusions,
although may have
missed a few
relevant citations.
The answer is
clearly represents
the empirical and
theoretical work.

existing research
and theory. Some
sections are
clearly organized
and focused and
others are not.

demonstration of
an understanding
of the conceptual
issues the
question
addressed.

Component
Individual
differences

Fully met (3)

Effectively and
insightfully answers
the exam question.
Provides scientific
evidence to support
conclusions and
provides a thoughtful,
rich, astute answer
that is consistent with
and or extends
existing empirical and
theoretical work.

Grammar, clarity,
and organization

The manuscript is
well written and ideas
are well developed
and explained.
Sentences and
paragraphs are
grammatically
correct. Uses
subheadings
appropriately.
Properly and explicitly
cited. Reference list
matches citations

References and
citations

Met (2)
Provides a solid
answer to the
question. Presents
good scientific
evidence to support
conclusions,
although may have
missed a few
relevant citations.
The answer is
clearly represents
the empirical and
theoretical work.
The manuscript
effectively
communicates
ideas. The writing is
grammatically
correct, but some
sections lack clarity.

Partially Met (1)

Answers the
question, but the
answer lacks
depth and a clear
integration of
existing research
and theory. Some
sections are
clearly organized
and focused and
others are not.

Not met (0)

Question is not
answered. The
answer is
superficial and
lacks any clear
demonstration of
an understanding
of the conceptual
issues the
question
addressed.

The manuscript
communicates
ideas adequately.
The manuscript
contains some
grammatical
errors. Many
sections lack
clarity.

The manuscript is
poorly written and
confusing. Ideas
are not
communicated
effectively.

Properly cited. May

have a few
instances in which
proper citations are
missing.

The manuscript
has several
instances of
improper use of
citations. Contains
several
statements
without
appropriately
citing.

The manuscript
lacks proper
citations or
includes no
citations.

Score

Notes:

LOPEZ NATIONAL COMPREHENSIVE HIGH SCHOOL

Lopez, Quezon
ICT PROJECT PRESENTATION
TEST II (items 26-40)

Content
Does the student appropriately and effectively exhibit or use the following:
Components
Yes
Sometim
No (0)
Total
(2)
es (1)
Accurately answer questions
Clarifies concerns in written
document (if NA answer yes)
Recovers from anxiety
Demonstrates knowledge of the
content area
total
Presentation and delivery: Oral components
Does the student appropriately and effectively exhibit or use the following:
Components
Yes
Someti
No (0)
Total
(2)
mes (1)
Eye contact
Facial expressions
Gestures/movement
Appropriate word choice
Proper pronunciation
Vocal variety
Self-confidence
Professionalism
Enthusiasm
Timing/pace
total
Presentation and delivery: Visual components
Are the visual aids (Power point slides, handouts.)
Components
Yes
Someti
(2)
mes (1)
Well organized
Clear and readable
Free of mechanical and
grammatical errors
Relevant and meaningful
Appropriately cited
Enhance overall presentation
total
Overall total:______________

No (0)

Total

LOPEZ NATIONAL COMPREHENSIVE HIGH SCHOOL

Lopez, Quezon
PRACTICUM COMPUTER APPLICATIONS
TEST I (items 1-25)
1

Student spent an Student spent an

Student spent too
Student spent too much
adequate amount of adequate amount of
much time and/or
Adequate Time Spent time and/or too little
time on computer time on computer
too little time on
on Activity
time on entire computer
lab activity to
lab activity to
parts of computer
lab activity.
ensure good
ensure the best
lab activity.
results.
results.
Student put little Student put a good Student put a great
Student put little to no
effort towards
amount of effort
deal of effort
Effort
effort towards computer
computer lab
towards computer towards computer
lab activity.
activity.
lab activity.
lab activity.
Student completed Student completed
Student completed less
Student completed
about 1/2 of the
about 80% of the
than 1/2 of the
all of the computer
Completion of Task
computer lab
computer lab
computer lab activity by
lab activity by the
activity by the given activity by the
the given time.
given time
time.
given time
Responses and
Responses and
Responses and
Responses and
information given information given information given
Reasonable Response information given are
are unreasonable in are reasonable are very reasonable
and Information
entirely unreasonable
some areas of the throughout most of throughout all of
throughout the activity.
activity.
the activity.
the activity.
Responses and
Responses and
Responses and
Responses and
information given information given
information given are information given
Neatness, Readability,
are neat, readable,
are very neat,
entirely unreadable and are unreadable and
and Legibility
and legible
readable, and
illegible throughout the illegible throughout
throughout most of legible throughout
activity.
most of the activity.
the activity.
all of the activity.

Total---->

____

____

____

____

____

____

Point System:
Test I total points = 25 points
Highest possible points for rubrics = 20pts
(Total score / highest possible points for rubrics) X Test I total points
= score

Teacher Reflection: