Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Adj.
1.
Architecture that has a connection to Nature. Building designs that take into
account climate and environmental conditions to help achieve optimal thermal
comfort inside. It deals with design and architectural elements, avoiding complete
dependence on mechanical systems, which are regarded as support. A good
example of this is using natural ventilation or mixed mode ventilation.
Is this new?
Traditional techniques work, and are time tested in many places as they are in
Spain. The coolness inside a thick-walled traditional village house at noon in August,
and the comfort of a traditional patio in Andalucia on a hot day are direct ways to
experience these techniques at work. Also, designing with Nature means accounting
for multi-seasonal considerations, for example, reducing heating needs with
maximum sunlight from Southern oriented windows. If these techniques have
worked for generations in these communities designed for their geographic region,
then clearly modern design could benefit from careful integration of these
traditional principles. It is entirely possible to design modern bioclimatic housing
This example also showcases the concept of biomimicry, in which nature is the
mentor for the concept of the design. Passive air cooling systems use the physical
properties of air density at different temperatures to force air through multiple
smaller spaces. The biomimicry in the case of Eastgate a midrise in Harare,
Zimbabwe is the designinspired by passive air cooling in termite
mounds. http://biomimicryinstitute.org/case-studies/case-studies/termite-inspiredair-conditioning.html.
The bioclimatic house doesnt need the purchase and installation of complicated
and expensive systems, because it uses the regular architectural elements to
increase the energetic performance and get a natural comfort. Cost savings begin
with designing to maximize the assets of the site. Bioclimatic design imposes a set
of guidelines, but there still remains a lot of freedom to design according to individ-
ual taste. Siting of the building, consideration of solar access, collection of rainwater, using thermal mass to your advantage, correct fenestration and solar shading
are all good examples of techniques that can be taken into account when designing.
The end product is much more energy efcient and in tune with its surroundings
and Nature.
Clothes hold much more meaning to us than the need for thermal protection:
starting simple, but now many original functionality features are lost to the concept
of fashion. Housing, too, means more than the need for a comfortable place to live.
Like fashion it now often represents a status symbol. As that symbol, it must adapt
to the established standards of status like convenience and leisure, and sometimes
ignoring basic functionalities like the environment (i.e. McMansions). Energy saving
and taking advantage of the sun may not fit into these standards. From this
perspective, having an expensive conditioning system to overheat in winter and
overcool in summer every single space in the house (even if it is seldom used) may
seem necessary. The cultural inertia of the overdone is hard to stop, even in the
face of Climate Change and the 2008 economic bubble burst. Because right now
many still think that consumption is necessary for economic growth, and that model
is still working. and yet energy prices continue to rise and minimum wage
continues to flatline.
There are many challenges facing the transition from excessive consumption to a
perspective that designing to be more efcient is the new status symbol. Primarily,
the powers that be are strong and they have built a legacy they want to continue. Big companies (the legacy industries) refuse to innovate, and lobby to keep
the status quo. No energy supply companies are really interested in new technologies for renewable energy, instead its only the new startup companies that tackle
the challenge. Necessoty is the mother of invention. To the startup companies, how
to increase their benefits at the site is the equation for success and profit. Selling
energy if you are making your own is an easy way to calculate cost recovery. Or
even not needing as much because the house is designed for according to human
use and needs at given times of the day, as opposed to having all rooms ready for
all possible uses at all possible times. Air conditioning manufacturers arent interested in alternative systems that make their technology less valuable: natural ventilation does not make money. Why would the powers that be want you to get energy
for free when they can charge for it?
Architects and builders often dont look beyond the success of their business to
promote alternate techniques, and often dont go through the hassle of introducing
something new to the consumer. With no information on the topic, the consumer
cannot demand alternative products that ultimately improve the livability of
structures and reduce the waste and expense of resources. Things that in the
economic Rational Man Model would be defined as maximizing and promoting true
self interests, yet it it still remains that there are few electric cars on the streets or
solar panels on rooftops. Consumers can not make informed decisions without
having all of the relevant information to make a truly rational choice.
Slowly, new programs, smart companies, eco citizens are becoming aware of the
energy waste problem, and things are babystepping forwardpromoting research on
the topic and generating new legislation and standards. For example, something as
simple as good insulation in buildings to keep heat inside is a topic for legislation of
increasing importance. And in a lot of countries institutions (USGBC.org) are appearing to perform research and spread bioclimatic knowledge among architects and
builders (like CIEMAT in Spain). Hundreds of books have been written on the topic,
and hundreds of projects related somehow to bioclimatic architecture have been
implemented around the world, and slowly it takes hold.