Vous êtes sur la page 1sur 229

UNDRAINED RESPONSE OF SATURATED SANDS

WITH EMPHASIS ON LIQUEFACTION AND CYCLIC MOBILITY


by
JIN-CHING CHERN

B.S., National Taiwan University, 1968


M.E., Asian I n s t i t u t e of Technology, 1971
M.A.Sc, The University of B r i t i s h Columbia, 1981

A THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILMENT OF


THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF
DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY

in
THE FACULTY OF GRADUATE STUDIES
DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL ENGINEERING

We accept this thesis as conforming


to the required standard

THE UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA


January, 1985
Jin-Ching Chem, 1985

In presenting t h i s thesis i n p a r t i a l f u l f i l m e n t of the


requirements for an advanced degree at the University
of B r i t i s h Columbia, I agree that the Library s h a l l make
i t f r e e l y available for reference and study.

I further

agree that permission for extensive copying of t h i s thesis


for scholarly purposes may

be granted by the head of

department or by h i s or her representatives.

my

It i s

understood that copying or publication of t h i s thesis


for f i n a n c i a l gain s h a l l not be allowed without my
permission.

Department of

C/u.'J

<g->^j j ^ r - ,

The University of B r i t i s h Columbia


1956 Main Mall

Vancouver, Canada
V6T

1Y3

Date

rLu*^^

/S" .

14 8-S~

written

ABSTRACT

An experimental i n v e s t i g a t i o n of the undrained monotonic and c y c l i c


loading behaviour of a saturated angular sand and a rounded sand under
t r i a x i a l conditions i s presented.

These studies are aimed at obtaining a

u n i f i e d approach to the undrained behaviour of sand spanning from s t r a i n


softening (termed l i q u e f a c t i o n or l i m i t e d l i q u e f a c t i o n ) to s t r a i n hardening

response and l i n k i n g the c y c l i c loading behaviour to the monotonic

loading behaviour.

It i s also aimed at i n v e s t i g a t i n g the differences In

undrained loading behaviour of sand with d i f f e r e n t p a r t i c l e a n g u l a r i t y .


Under monotonic loading, the s t r a i n softening response i s i n i t i a t e d
and terminated at two d i s t i n c t values of e f f e c t i v e s t r e s s r a t i o termed
c r i t i c a l e f f e c t i v e s t r e s s r a t i o state (CSR) and phase

transformation

s t a t e (PT), regardless of the r e l a t i v e density and consolidation stress


conditions.

For s t r a i n hardening response, the s t a r t of d i l a t i o n also

occurs at the same e f f e c t i v e s t r e s s r a t i o of PT f o r s t r a i n softening


response.

It i s shown that the unique steady s t a t e l i n e concept f o r

l i q u e f a c t i o n Is a l s o v a l i d f o r l i m i t e d l i q u e f a c t i o n .

The PT states f o r

s t r a i n hardening response, however, form a s e r i e s of l i n e s , which are


function of I n i t i a l void r a t i o , merging i n t o the unique steady state l i n e
as the consolidation stresses increase.
A 3-D

e f f e c t i v e s t r e s s state behavioural model i s developed, which

enables p r e d i c t i o n of the anticipated undrained loading behaviour ( s t r a i n


softening or s t r a i n hardening) from the knowledge of the i n i t i a l state of
the sand.

It Is shown that a complete s p e c i f i c a t i o n s of i n i t i a l state of

sand, i . e . , void r a t i o , confining pressure and s t a t i c shear, i s required


to predict the type of undrained response, e s p e c i a l l y f o r angular sand.

- ii -

Under c y c l i c loading, i f l i q u e f a c t i o n develops, the CSR, e f f e c t i v e


stress r a t i o at PT state and steady state l i n e are the same as those
observed under monotonic loading.

If c y c l i c m o b i l i t y develops, the

e f f e c t i v e stress r a t i o at PT state i s also the same as that observed


under monotonic loading.

Thus, the 3-D e f f e c t i v e stress state diagram

provides a l i n k between monotonic and c y c l i c loading behaviour, and i s


used to develop the c r i t e r i a f o r the occurrence of l i q u e f a c t i o n and
cyclic mobility.

The influences of void r a t i o and confining pressure on

the c y c l i c loading behaviour are s i m i l a r to those f o r the monotonic loading behaviour.

However, the influence of s t a t i c shear on c y c l i c loading

behaviour can be completely d i f f e r e n t depending on whether l i q u e f a c t i o n


or c y c l i c m o b i l i t y i s developed.
The undrained loading behaviour of rounded sand i s s i m i l a r to that
of the angular sand.

However, for the range of consolidation stresses of

i n t e r e s t , the i n i t i a l r e l a t i v e density alone provides a good s i n g l e parameter c h a r a c t e r i z i n g the i n i t i a l state of the sand, and hence i t s a n t i c i pated response.

- i i i

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Chapter

Page

INTRODUCTION

GENERAL ASPECTS OF UNDRAINED BEHAVIOUR OF SAND

LABORATORY TESTING

21

3.1. Test Apparatus

21

3.1.1. T r i a x i a l Apparatus

21

3.1.2. Loading System

24

3.2. Testing Procedures

31

3.2.1. Sample Preparation and Saturation

31

3.2.2. Methods of Loading

34

3.3. Testing Program

38

3.4. Material Tested

41

3.4.1. S o i l Description

41

3.4.2. Consolidation C h a r a c t e r i s t i c s

43

UNDRAINED MONOTONIC LOADING BEHAVIOUR

48

4.1. Typical Undrained Monotonic Loading Behaviour

48

4.2. S t r a i n Softening and S t r a i n Hardening Responses

68

4.2.1. C l a s s i f i c a t i o n of Undrained Responses

69

4.2.2. C h a r a c t e r i s t i c s of S t r a i n Softening and


Strain Hardening Responses
4.3. Undrained Strength Under Monotonic Loading

82
91

4.3.1. Peak Strength for States which Developed


Liquefaction

94

4.3.2. Steady State Strength

104

4.3.3. Phase Transformation Strength f o r D i l a t i v e


Response

107
- iv -

TABLE OF CONTENTS (cont'd)

Chapter

Page
4.4. 3-D E f f e c t i v e Stress State Diagram

109

4.5. Role of Void Ratio, Confining Pressure and


S t a t i c Shear Stress on Undrained Monotonic
Loading Behaviour

115

4.5.1. Void Ratio or Relative Density

115

4.5.2. Confining Pressure

116

4.5.3. S t a t i c Shear Stress or Consolidation


Stress Ratio
5

118

UNDRAINED CYCLIC LOADING BEHAVIOUR

122

5.1. Liquefaction Induced Under C y c l i c Loading

123

5.1.1. Liquefaction During C y c l i c Loading

124

5.1.2. A p p l i c a b i l i t y of Steady State Concept to


Liquefaction Under C y c l i c Loading Conditions

129

5.1.3. C r i t e r i a to Cause Liquefaction Under C y c l i c


Loading

136

5.1.4. Test Results

145

5.2. C y c l i c Mobility Induced Under C y c l i c Loading


5.2.1. Strain Development Due to C y c l i c Mobility

157
157

5.2.2. C r i t e r i a to Cause C y c l i c M o b i l i t y Under


C y c l i c Loading
5.2.3. Test Results

169
169

5.3. Resistance to Strain Development Under C y c l i c


Loading

177

5.4. Influence of Certain Factors on the Undrained


C y c l i c Loading Behaviour
- v -

179

TABLE OF CONTENTS (cont'd)

Chapter

Page
5.4.1. Void Ratio or R e l a t i v e Density

179

5.4.2. Confining Pressure

181

5.4.3. S t a t i c Shear Stress or Consolidation


Stress Ratio

185

5.5. Prediction of Undrained C y c l i c Loading Behaviour

194

5.6. Phenomenon of Spontaneous Liquefaction

197

CONCLUSIONS

206

REFERENCES

210

- vi-

LIST OF FIGURES
Figure
2.1
2.2
2.3
2.4
2.5
2.6

Page
Characteristic behaviour of saturated sand under
undrained monotonic loading

Effective stress paths of contractive and dilative


response

11

Characteristic behaviour of dilative sand after large


deformation

11

Strain development on loading after the attainment of


transient state of zero effective stress

14

Cyclic loading behaviour of contractive sand - true


liquefaction and limited liquefaction

16

Cyclic loading behaviour of dilative sand - cyclic


mobility

18

3.1

Schematic layout of t r i a x i a l apparatus

22

3.2

Schematic layout of loading system

25

3.3

Detailed layout of consolidation system

26

3.4
3.5

Anisotropic consolidation stress paths


Undrained monotonic loading response with limited
liquefaction using dead weight loading

30
36

Influence of the pneumatic loading system on the strain


softening behaviour

37

3.7

Grain size distribution curves of sands tested

42

3.8

Consolidation characteristics of tailings sand

44

3.9

Consolidation characteristics of Ottawa sand

45

4.1
a-c

Undrained monotonic compression loading behaviour of


i n i t i a l l y loose tailings sand under low, moderate and
high confining pressure

50

Effective stress paths of monotonic compression loading


response of i n i t i a l l y loose tailings sand

53

3.6

4.2

- vii -

LIST OF FIGURES (Continued)

Figure
4.3
a,b

Page
Undrained monotonic compression loading behaviour of
i n i t i a l l y dense t a i l i n g s sand under moderate and high
confining pressure

55

E f f e c t i v e stress paths of monotonic compression loading


response of i n i t i a l l y dense t a i l i n g s sand

57

Undrained monotonic extension loading behaviour of


i n i t i a l l y loose t a i l i n g s sand

59

Undrained monotonic compression loading behaviour of


i n i t i a l l y loose Ottawa sand under low and high confining
pressure

60

E f f e c t i v e stress paths of monotonic compression loading


response of i n i t i a l l y loose Ottawa sand

62

Undrained monotonic compression loading behaviour of


i n i t i a l l y medium dense Ottawa sand under low and high
confining pressure

64

E f f e c t i v e stress paths of monotonic compression loading


response of i n i t i a l l y medium dense Ottawa sand

66

Undrained monotonic extension loading behaviour of


i n i t i a l l y medium dense Ottawa sand

67

Relationship between e c and


at PT state f o r t a i l i n g s
sand at f i x e d e^ under undrained compression loading . . . .

70

Relationship between e c and


at PT state f o r t a i l i n g s
sand with various e^ under undrained compression loading

71

Relationship between e c and a 3 at PT state f o r Ottawa


sand with various e^ under undrained compression loading

75

Comparison of steady state condition under compression


and extension

77

Grain size d i s t r i b u t i o n of t a i l i n g s sand before and after


test

79

4.16

Microphotograph of t a i l i n g s sand before and a f t e r test ..

81

4.17

Undrained monotonic loading response under various


confining pressure

83

4.4

4.5

4.6
a,b

4.7

4.8
a,b

4.9

4.10

4.11

4.12

4.13

4.14

4.15

viii-

LIST OF FIGURES (Continued)

Figure
4.18

4.19

4.20

4.21

4.22

4.23

4.24

4.25

4.26

Page
E f f e c t i v e stress conditions at the i n i t i a t i o n of s t r a i n
softening response and s t a r t of d i l a t i o n of t a i l i n g s sand
under undrained compression loading

85

Undrained monotonic loading behaviour of t a i l i n g s sand


consolidated Into the region of contractive deformation

88

E f f e c t i v e stress conditions at the i n i t i a t i o n of s t r a i n


softening response and s t a r t of d i l a t i o n of Ottawa sand
under undrained compression loading

90

E f f e c t i v e stress conditions at the i n i t i a t i o n of s t r a i n


softening response and s t a r t of d i l a t i o n of t a i l i n g s
sand under undrained extension loading

92

E f f e c t i v e stress conditions at the i n i t i a t i o n of s t r a i n


softening response and s t a r t of d i l a t i o n of Ottawa
sand under undrained extension loading

93

Relationship between e f f e c t i v e minor p r i n c i p a l stress


at CSR state and e f f e c t i v e minor consolidation stress
for t a i l i n g s sand

95

Relationship between the r a t i o of e f f e c t i v e minor


p r i n c i p a l stress at CSR state and e f f e c t i v e minor
consolidation stress vs K c r a t i o for t a i l i n g s sand

96

Comparison of undrained monotonic loading response of


t a i l i n g s sand under the same major consolidation stress
but with d i f f e r e n t K c ratios

99

Undrained strengths of t a i l i n g s sand under monotonic


compression loading

100

Relationship between e f f e c t i v e minor p r i n c i p a l stress at


CSR state and e f f e c t i v e minor consolidation stress f o r
Ottawa sand

102

Relationship between the r a t i o of e f f e c t i v e minor p r i n c i pal stress at CSR state and e f f e c t i v e minor consolidation
stress vs K r a t i o for Ottawa sand

103

4.29

Steady state shear strength of t a i l i n g s sand

105

4.30

Steady state shear strength of Ottawa sand

106

4.31

(a) 3-D e f f e c t i v e stress state diagram f o r t a i l i n g s sand,


and (b) A t y p i c a l section at constant e c

112

4.27

4.28

- ix -

LIST OF FIGURES (Continued)


Figure
A.32
5.1
a-c
5.2
a-c
5.3

5.4

5.5
5.6
5.7

Page
Influence of static shear stress on the undrained monotonic loading behaviour

119

Undrained cyclic loading behaviour of contractive


tailings sand under low, moderate and high confining
pressure

125

Undrained cyclic loading behaviour of i n i t i a l l y loose


Ottawa sand under low, moderate and high confining
pressure

130

Effective stress conditions at the i n i t i a t i o n of strain


softening response and start of dilation of tailings
sand under undrained cyclic loading

134

Effective stress conditions at the i n i t i a t i o n of strain


softening response and start of dilation of Ottawa sand
under undrained cyclic loading

135

Comparison of steady state confining stress of tailings


sand under monotonic and cyclic loading conditions

137

Comparison of steady state confining stress of Ottawa


sand under monotonic and cyclic loading conditions

138

Comparison of steady state shear strength of tailings


sand under monotonic and cyclic loading conditions

139

5.8

Comparison of steady state shear strength of Ottawa sand


under monotonic and cyclic loading conditions
140

5.9

Cyclic shear stress conditions to cause liquefaction at


fixed e c

142

Cyclic stress required to cause liquefaction or 2.5%


axial strain for contractive tailings sand consolidated
to various Kc ratios

14?

5.10

5.11

Typical undrained cyclic loading response for contractive


tailings sand showing cyclic mobility
149

5.12

Typical undrained cyclic loading response for contractive


tailings sand showing (a) liquefaction and (b) cyclic
mobility
150

5.13

Typical strain development vs number of cycles for contractive tailings sand consolidated to various K ratios

- x -

1 5 2

LIST OF FIGURES (Continued)

Figure

Page

5.14

C y c l i c s t r e s s required to cause l i q u e f a c t i o n f o r i n i t i a l l y
loose Ottawa sand consolidated to various Kc r a t i o s
153

5.15

Typical i l l u s t r a t i o n of l i q u e f a c t i o n of i s o t r o p i c a l l y
consolidated Ottawa sand under c y c l i c loading

155

Typical s t r a i n development vs number of cycles f o r


i n i t i a l l y loose Ottawa sand consolidated to various K c
ratios

156

5.17
a-c

Typical undrained c y c l i c loading behaviour of i s o t r o p i c a l l y consolidated d i l a t i v e t a i l i n g s sand

159

5.18
a-c

Typical undrained c y c l i c loading behaviour of anisot r o p i c a l l y consolidated d i l a t i v e t a i l i n g s sand

162

5.19

Schematic i l l u s t r a t i o n o f monotonic and c y c l i c loading


response of saturated sand i n 2-D state diagram

167

C y c l i c stress required to cause 2.5% a x i a l s t r a i n f o r


d i l a t i v e t a i l i n g s sand consolidated to various K c ratios

171

5.21

Typical s t r a i n development vs number of cycles f o r


d i l a t i v e t a i l i n g s sand consolidated to various K c r a t i o s

172

5.22

C y c l i c s t r e s s required to cause 2.5% a x i a l s t r a i n f o r


medium dense Ottawa sand consolidated to various K c
ratios

175

Typical s t r a i n development vs number of cycles f o r


medium dense Ottawa sand consolidated to various K c
ratios

176

Influence of confining pressure on the resistance to


s t r a i n development under c y c l i c loading

183

Influence of s t a t i c shear s t r e s s on the resistance to


s t r a i n development under c y c l i c loading: (a) d i l a t i v e
t a i l i n g s sand; (b) medium dense Ottawa sand

186

Influence of s t a t i c shear s t r e s s on the resistance to


s t r a i n development under c y c l i c loading: (a) contractive
t a i l i n g s sand; (b) i n i t i a l l y loose Ottawa sand

137

Schematic i l l u s t r a t i o n showing the influence of s t a t i c


shear stress on the resistance to l i q u e f a c t i o n under
c y c l i c loading

192

5.16

5.20

5.23

5.24

5.25

5.26

5.27

- xi-

LIST OF FIGURES (Continued)

Figure
5.28

5.29

Page
Flow chart f o r assessing the p o t e n t i a l of l i q u e f a c t i o n
or c y c l i c m o b i l i t y

196

Spontaneous l i q u e f a c t i o n induced by pore pressure


increase i n i n i t i a l l y loose Ottawa sand

200

5.30

5.31

5.32

Spontaneous l i q u e f a c t i o n Induced by pore pressure


increase i n contractive t a i l i n g s sand

201

Comparison of r e l a t i v e values of s t a t i c shear stress


and steady state shear strength f o r t a i l i n g s sand at two
Kc r a t i o s

203

Comparison of r e l a t i v e values of s t a t i c shear s t r e s s


and steady s t a t e shear strength f o r Ottawa sand at two
Kc r a t i o s

204

- xii -

NOTATIONS

A ^ a r e a

of top chamber and bottom chamber of air loading piston

Ar

area of the loading ram

sample area

a
max

maximum ground surface acceleration

Skempton's pore pressure parameter

c r i t i c a l effective stress ratio constant = ( a * / c l )

CSR

c r i t i c a l effective stress ratio

CT

characteristic threshold

relative density

rc

relative density after consolidation


i n i t i a l relative density of specimen as prepared (under
2

i n i t i a l effective stress of 0.2 kgf/cm )


e

void ratio

e^

void ratio after consolidation


i n i t i a l void ratio of specimen as prepared (under i n i t i a l
2

effective stress of 0.2 kgf/cm )


g

gravitational acceleration

bias relay constant

consolidation stress ratio = o' fal


l c 3c

magnification factor of pressure amplifier

number of stress cycles

p,p1,p2,p

air pressures

P*

= 1/2 (a* +

PT

phase transformation

ap

xii i

= 1/2 (a' - op
magnification factor of ratio relay
signal pressure
steady state line
undrained peak shear strength
undrained steady state shear strength
shear stress increment to peak shear strength under undrained
monotonic loading
pore pressure
excess pore pressure
axial strain
angle of internal friction
major and minor effective pricipal stresses
major total principal stress
major and minor effective prinpcipal stress increments
major and minor effective principal consolidation stresses
critical consolidation stress
major and minor effective principal stresses at peak
strength
deviator stress
cyclic deviator stress
deviator stress increment
cyclic shear stress = (jCy./2
static shear stress

xiv

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

In presenting this t h e s i s , the author wishes to express his g r a t i tude to the University of B r i t i s h Columbia and National Research Council
of Canada for f i n a n c i a l support which made t h i s i n v e s t i g a t i o n possible.
The author would also l i k e to thank the following Individuals:
His supervisor, Dr. Y.P. Vaid, for h i s invaluable guidance and advice
during the entire course of the research.
Dr. P.M. Byrne, Dr. R.G. Campanella and Dr. W.D.L. Finn for their valuable comments.
His colleagues for their valuable discussions, and Dr. P.K. Robertson
for h i s suggestion i n the manner of presenting part of the test
results.
The s t a f f of the C i v i l Engineering Department Workshop for t h e i r
technical assistance i n f a b r i c a t i n g the t e s t i n g equipments.
Mrs. Brenda G i l l e s p i e for her assistance i n drafting the f i g u r e s , and
Mrs. K e l l y Lamb for typing the manuscripts and f i n a l t h e s i s .

And f i n a l l y , the author deeply appreciates the support and


consideration given to him by h i s wife during the entire course of his
studies.

- xv -

1.
CHAPTER 1
INTRODUCTION

Undrained loading behaviour of saturated sands i s of direct i n t e r e s t


i n practice where deposits of such materials may

be subjected to rapid

shearing.

develop large deforma-

As a result of such loading, sand may

t i o n s , and f o r c e r t a i n I n i t i a l states may


fluid.

even flow l i k e a f r i c t i o n a l

The undrained shearing could be due to c y c l i c earthquake loading

or rapidly applied s t a t i c loading such that p r a c t i c a l l y no drainage


occurs
A large number of studies (e.g. , Finn et a l . , 1971;
a l . , 1975;

Lee and Seed, 1967

1,2

; Seed and Lee, 1966;

Ishihara et

Seed et a l . ,

1975)

have been reported i n l i t e r a t u r e concerning the large deformation developed i n saturated sands under c y c l i c loading.

The main emphasis i n these

studies has been on the resistance of sand to s t r a i n development, with


l i t t l e attention paid as to the mechanism which i s responsible for t h i s
s t r a i n development.

Most researchers attributed the developments of

large deformation under c y c l i c loading to l i q u e f a c t i o n .


of developing

This phenomenon

large deformation under c y c l i c loading has apparently been

c a l l e d l i q u e f a c t i o n , because these deformations are developed when a


condition of transient zero e f f e c t i v e stress occurs i n the sand at some
stage of the c y c l i c loading.
Large deformations can also occur i n saturated sands under rapidly
applied s t a t i c loads.

The development of such deformations under s t a t i c

loading conditions, which i s a r e s u l t of s t r a i n softening (temporary or


permanent decrease i n shear resistance with continued straining)
undrained response of sand, has been treated separately as another

2.

category of problem (e.g., Casagran.de 1975,


been termed l i q u e f a c t i o n .

Castro 1969), and has also

This type of l i q u e f a c t i o n response can not be

explained within the framework of l i q u e f a c t i o n as perceived under c y c l i c


loading conditions.
It i s now recognized, however, that the development of large deformation could be the result of transient zero e f f e c t i v e stress condition
developed at c e r t a i n stage of the c y c l i c loading without any s t r a i n s o f t ening, or s t r a i n softening response developed under s t a t i c or even c y c l i c
loading conditions (Castro 1969;. Seed, 1979).

These two phenomena have

been called c y c l i c mobility and l i q u e f a c t i o n , respectively (Castro, 1969;


Casagrande, 1975; Seed, 1979) and w i l l also be referred to as such i n
this t h e s i s . However, due to a lack of clear d i s t i n c t i o n as to which of
the two phenomena i s responsible f o r development of s t r a i n , considerable
controversies have arisen regarding the Influence of some f a c t o r s , most
notably the l e v e l of s t a t i c shear, on the resistance to s t r a i n development i n l i q u e f a c t i o n and c y c l i c m o b i l i t y (Casagrande, 1975;
Poulos, 1977).

Castro and

A proper recognition of the mechanism of s t r a i n develop-

ment ( l i q u e f a c t i o n or c y c l i c mobility) i s v i t a l for a r a t i o n a l explanat i o n of some of the c o n f l i c t i n g ideas regarding undrained response of
1

sand (Vaid and Chern, 1983 ' ).


T r a d i t i o n a l l y , the study of the phenomenon of l i q u e f a c t i o n under
monotonic loading has been c a r r i e d out on sand which developed s t r a i n
softening response with unlimited deformation (Castro, 1969). The
concept of an eventual steady state of deformation has been advanced i n
r e l a t i o n to the sand during the state of l i q u e f a c t i o n .

The state of sand

i s characterized by i t s void r a t i o and the e f f e c t i v e stress conditions.

3.
Liquefaction i s thus considered a phenomenon wherein a sand, which i s
consolidated

to a state well above the steady state, develops large u n i -

d i r e c t i o n a l deformation associated with s t r a i n softening response on


undrained shearing, ultimately ending at steady s t a t e .

Such a sand has

been c a l l e d contractive for which a unique steady state l i n e ,

independent

of the loading paths causing the steady state deformations, has been
proposed (Castro, 1969; Castro and Poulos, 1977; Castro et a l , 1982).
Based on this perception of l i q u e f a c t i o n , the development of large deformation i s exclusively due to the occurrence of s t r a i n softening leading
to steady state deformation.

Liquefaction can not be induced i n sand

with i n i t i a l state below the steady state l i n e and such a sand i s c a l l e d


dilative.
During c y c l i c loading, the deformation can develop either due to the
occurrence of l i q u e f a c t i o n or c y c l i c mobility (Castro, 1975; Vaid and
2
Chem, 19 83 ) .

In most c y c l i c loading s t u d i e s , however, predominant

focus has tended to be on the response of d i l a t i v e sand In which s t r a i n


development occurs as a consequence of c y c l i c mobility (Seed and Lee,
1966; Lee and Seed, 1967).

For c e r t a i n i n i t i a l states and c y c l i c

s t r e s s e s , a sand may develop l i m i t e d l i q u e f a c t i o n ( s t r a i n softening


response, but without unlimited s t r a i n ) under c y c l i c loading (Vaid and
1 2
Chern, 1983 ' ) .

In such cases, c y c l i c mobility can occur a f t e r the

occurrence of limited l i q u e f a c t i o n , when c y c l i c loading i s continued,


which r e s u l t s i n additional accumulation of s t r a i n .

Thus, i t i s conceiv-

able that l i q u e f a c t i o n and c y c l i c mobility occur In d i f f e r e n t regimes of


i n i t i a l sand s t a t e .

In between, both l i m i t e d l i q u e f a c t i o n and c y c l i c

mobility can occur, and limited l i q u e f a c t i o n always precedes c y c l i c


mobility.

4.

In the steady state approach to l i q u e f a c t i o n (Castro, 1969; Castro


et a l . , 1982), the void r a t i o and confining pressure have been used i n a
2-D

state diagram to separate the i n i t i a l sand state into regions of

l i q u e f a c t i o n and d i l a t i v e responses.

Tests on sand are performed

purposely f o r those I n i t i a l states which induce l i q u e f a c t i o n only.

For

states which develop d i l a t i v e response i n monotonic loading or c y c l i c


mobility i n c y c l i c loading are considered of no concern.

Although the

general influence of s t a t i c shear stress on the occurrence of liquefact i o n has been i d e n t i f i e d , the s t a t i c shear stress has never been incorporated as a part characterizing the i n i t i a l state of sand i n order to
predict the occurrence of l i q u e f a c t i o n . Only an a r b i t r a r y c r i t e r i o n ,
such as sand with an i n i t i a l state well above and to the right of the
steady state l i n e i s susceptible to l i q u e f a c t i o n , has been proposed.
clear quantitative boundary for separating

No

the I n i t i a l states into

regions of l i q u e f a c t i o n and d i l a t i v e response has been s p e c i f i e d , and


thus the influence of several factors on the undrained behaviour of sand
can not be explained r a t i o n a l l y .

At present, no comprehensive and

u n i f i e d approach exists which covers the undrained behaviour of sand i n


both contractive (which includes l i m i t e d liquefaction) and d i l a t i v e
regimes, and enables prediction of the undrained response from the knowledge of the I n i t i a l sand state together with the nature of loading
applied.
Most of the understanding i n the undrained behaviour of saturated
sand has been obtained from tests performed on natural sands with genera l l y rounded p a r t i c l e s and under r e l a t i v e l y low confining pressures.
Relative density has often been used as the sole c r i t e r i o n to separate
the regions of development of l i q u e f a c t i o n and c y c l i c m o b i l i t y , without

5,

any reference as to the p a r t i c l e angularity and consolidation stress


condition.

It i s generally believed that sand with low r e l a t i v e density

i s susceptible to l i q u e f a c t i o n , and that with high r e l a t i v e density can


develop c y c l i c mobility only.

However, there Is a f a i r acceptance of the

fact that sand behaviour Is very much dependent on the p a r t i c l e charact e r i s t i c s and consolidation stress condition.

Thus, i t may not be

prudent to predict behaviour of a sand by extrapolating the results


obtained on another sand under r e l a t i v e l y low consolidation stress and
d i f f e r e n t consolidation stress conditions.
The f i r s t purpose of these investigations i s to present a u n i f i e d
approach f o r the undrained behaviour of sand which spans between liquef a c t i o n with unlimited deformation on one side and d i l a t i v e response on
the other.

This i s done by an experimental study of the undrained mono-

tonic loading behaviour which covers the whole spectrum of undrained


response, i . e . , from s t r a i n softening response associated with the development of unlimited s t r a i n on one end to s t r a i n hardening response on the
other, using a wide range of i n i t i a l sand s t a t e s .
behavioural

Then, a comprehensive

model f o r the sand Is attempted, which enables prediction of

the undrained monotonic loading behaviour from the knowledge of i n i t i a l


state of the sand.

The l i n k between undrained s t a t i c and c y c l i c loading

response i s demonstrated within the framework of undrained monotonic


loading behaviour, i . e . whether l i q u e f a c t i o n or c y c l i c mobility w i l l
develop under c y c l i c loading conditions i n sand which i s characterized as
contractive or d i l a t i v e under undrained monotonic loading condition.
Furthermore, a d d i t i o n a l c y c l i c loading c r i t e r i a f o r l i q u e f a c t i o n under
c y c l i c loading i s established even i f l i q u e f a c t i o n w i l l be expected under
monotonic loading.

The behavioural model f o r the sand i s also used to

6.

explain the influence of factors (such as void r a t i o , confining pressure


and s t a t i c shear) on the undrained behaviour of saturated sand under both
s t a t i c and c y c l i c loading conditions i n an attempt to c l a r i f y some
contradictory conclusions i n l i t e r a t u r e arisen primarily due to d i f f e r e n t
perceptions of the phenomenon of l i q u e f a c t i o n .
The second objective of the study i s the investigation of the
differences i n the undrained response of sand with changes i n p a r t i c l e
angularity.

This i s achieved by comprehensive experimental studies over

a large range of confining pressure on two sands having i d e n t i c a l gradation and mineral composition, one angular and the other rounded.
Behaviour of angular sands under high confining pressure i s of utmost
importance i n the design of t a i l i n g s dams where such sands are used.
There i s a growing trend towards b u i l d i n g t a i l i n g s dams of increasing
height.

Confining pressure up to 25.0 kgf/cm

encountered i n such dams of 200 m height.

(2450 kPa) could be

T a i l i n g s dams of this height

are either being constructed or under consideration i n the future.

The

undrained behaviour of t a i l i n g s sand under high confining pressure could


have a dramatic difference from that of the rounded or subrounded sands.

7.
CHAPTER 2
GENERAL ASPECTS OF UNDRAINED BEHAVIOUR OF SAND

Undrained response of saturated sand Is t r a d i t i o n a l l y considered


separately under monotonic and c y c l i c loading conditions.

Interest i n

monotonic loading has generally been related to undrained f a i l u r e associated with flow s l i d e s .

The c h a r a c t e r i s t i c feature of such behaviour Is

extremely large deformation under very small shear resistance.


Conditions which could bring about such a response from s o i l could be
rapid increase i n stresses due to earthquake loading, shock loading or
even s t a t i c loading.

Interest i n c y c l i c undrained loading behaviour has

been related to the s u s c e p t i b i l i t y of sand to accumulate undesirable


deformation during earthquake shaking.

Monotonic Loading Behaviour


The range of t y p i c a l undrained t r i a x i a l compression behaviour of
i s o t r o p i c a l l y consolidated saturated sand under moderate confining
pressure i s shown i n F i g . 2.1. The v a r i a t i o n s In s t r e s s - s t r a i n curves
from type 1 to type 5 i s associated with Increasing r e l a t i v e density.
These types of response have been reported by several i n v e s t i g a t o r s , such
as Bishop, Webb and Skinner (1965), Bjerrum, Kringstad and Kummeneje
(1961), Castro (1969), Castro et a l . (1982) and Lee and Seed (1970). The
same type of c h a r a c t e r i s t i c behaviour i s also obtained i f the sand i s
i n i t i a l l y a n i s o t r o p i c a l l y consolidated.
Types 1, 2 and 3 are s t r a i n softening response - a behaviour associated with loss of shear resistance a f t e r the occurrence of a peak.
Sand showing such behaviour i s c a l l e d c o n t r a c t i v e .

Type 1 response has

F i g . 2.1

Characteristic behaviour of saturated sand


under undrained monotonic loading.

been c a l l e d l i q u e f a c t i o n by Castro (1969), Casagrande (1975) and Seed


(1979).

It is. a s t r a i n softening response with unlimited u n i d i r e c t i o n a l

s t r a i n and w i l l be c a l l e d herein true l i q u e f a c t i o n .

The c h a r a c t e r i s t i c

feature of this type of response i s continued deformation at constant


void r a t i o , confining stress and shear resistance, which has been c a l l e d
steady state deformation or flow deformation, since i t resembles flow of
f l u i d (Poulos, 1971; Castro, 1975; Vaid and Chern, 1 9 8 3 ) . However, the
shear resistance during such deformation i s of a f r i c t i o n a l nature,
instead of zero, as would be the case for a f l u i d .
Type 2 and 3 responses were c a l l e d limited liquefacton by Castro
(1969).

Such types of response i s thus s t r a i n softening with limited

unidirectional s t r a i n .

Instead of deforming continuously at reduced

constant shear resistance, the shear resistance of sand increases with


further deformation after attaining a minimum, and simultaneously the
pore pressure decreases after attaining i t s maximum v a l u e . However, over
some f i n i t e range of s t r a i n prior to the commencement of increase i n
shear resistance, the sand deforms at e s s e n t i a l l y constant void r a t i o ,
e f f e c t i v e confining stress and shear r e s i s t a n c e , which could be
considered as the steady state condition of the case of true liquefaction.

The difference i n response represented by type 2 and type 3 i s a

lesser degree of s t r a i n softening and associated smaller s t r a i n u n t i l the


start of increase i n shear resistance or decrease i n pore pressure i n
type 3 compared to that i n type 2.
The arrows i n F i g . 2.1 indicate the arrest of s t r a i n softening
response, i . e . , the start of increase i n shear resistance and decrease i n
pore pressure with further s t r a i n i n g .

On e f f e c t i v e stress path, this

condition i s reflected by a sharp turnaround of the e f f e c t i v e stress

10.
path.

Such a condition has been c a l l e d phase transformation (PT) state

by Ishihara et a l . (1975).

After the PT state has been reached, the

e f f e c t i v e stress path approaches the undrained f a i l u r e envelope rather


quickly with further s t r a i n i n g .

A state of PT for true l i q u e f a c t i o n

(type 1 response) coincides with the attainment of steady s t a t e . The


stress state then stays on the PT l i n e while steady state deformation
continues I n d e f i n i t e l y .
Type 4 response i s associated with a terminal case of s t r a i n softening

response i n which the degree of s t r a i n softening can be considered as

zero.

Such a behaviour i s represented by a f l a t plateau i n s t r e s s - s t r a i n

curve over a certain s t r a i n range before the shear resistance starts to


increase and pore pressure starts to decrease with further s t r a i n i n g .
Type 5 response represents the s t r a i n hardening behaviour with no
loss of shear resistance.
tive.

Sand showing such behaviour i s c a l l e d d i l a -

For such a response, a sharp turnaround i n the e f f e c t i v e stress

path i s not well defined (see F i g . 2.2).

However, the condition of start

of decrease i n pore pressure after i t s maximum value i s well defined.


Such a condition has been c a l l e d c h a r a c t e r i s t i c threshold (CT) by Luong
(1980), which i s the same as the PT state described before. Luong
further showed that this threshold occurs at the same e f f e c t i v e stress
r a t i o regardless of the r e l a t i v e density of sand.

I t represents the

boundary between contractive and d i l a t i v e regions of sand i n e f f e c t i v e


stress space.

Luong's conclusions were based on tests on one sand under

low confining pressure only.


It may be pointed out that a sand exhibiting s t r a i n hardening
response can develop s t r a i n softening response but only after large
straining.

Such type of response i s i l l u s t r a t e d schematically i n F i g .

F i g . 2.2

F i g . 2.3

E f f e c t i v e stress paths of contractive


d i l a t i v e response.

and

C h a r a c t e r i s t i c behaviour of d i l a t i v e sand a f t e r large


deformation.

12.
2.3.

After i n i t i a l s t r a i n hardening response (Type 5 ) , the sand d i l a t e s

u n t i l the e f f e c t i v e confining stress becomes high enough to cause cont r a c t i o n i n the sand.

The sand then develops a s t r a i n softening response

ultimately leading to a state of constant e f f e c t i v e confining stress and


constant shear resistance.

This was also termed steady state by Poulos

(1981) and Castro et a l . (1982).

This type of s t r a i n softening response

however can be induced only after very large s t r a i n i n g , and the shear
stress required to induce such response i s well above the levels of
p r a c t i c a l interest and may even be greater than the drained strength.
Moreover, the back pressure for the sand to sustain the negative excess
pore pressure without causing c a v i t a t i o n i s very high, which may
be encountered In p r a c t i c a l cases.

seldom

Therefore, this type of response Is

not considered i n this i n v e s t i g a t i o n .


Predominant interest i n monotonic loading behaviour has been with
the

occurrence of true l i q u e f a c t i o n .

Castro (1969), Castro et a l . (1982)

and Casagrande (1975) studied such behaviour i n r e l a t i o n to the problem


of

flow s l i d e .

It has been shown by Castro (1969) that i f sand undergoes

true l i q u e f a c t i o n , the e f f e c t i v e confining stress and shear resistance


during steady state deformation are uniquely related to void r a t i o , and
that such r e l a t i o n s h i p i s independent of the i n i t i a l consolidation stress
condition.

This unique l i n e r e l a t i n g the void r a t i o with effective con-

f i n i n g stress or shear resistance during steady state was called steady


state l i n e .

T r i a x i a l tests on several sands with rounded to angular

p a r t i c l e s under a wide range of confining pressure and consolidation


stress r a t i o have been shown to support these concepts (Castro, 1969;
Castro et a l . 1982).

However, the studies have been limited to compres-

sion mode only, and possible influence of stress path, e.g., t r i a x i a l

13.
extension, was not considered. Only true l i q u e f a c t i o n was considered and
no attention was given to the treatment of range of behaviour described
by response type 2 to type 5 ( F i g . 2.1).

Consideration was given only to

relate parameters during steady state deformation.

In p a r t i c u l a r , no

quantitative attempt was made to assess whether such a response couldN


occur for a known i n i t i a l state of the sand.
ion,

Only an a r b i t r a r y c r i t e r -

e.g., i n i t i a l state above and s i g n i f i c a n t l y to the right of steady

state l i n e w i l l cause true l i q u e f a c t i o n , was proposed.

Furthermore, In

t h e i r approach the deformation i s considered unlimited so that their


design proposal are similar to a strength c r i t e r i o n .

Many cases of

l i m i t e d l i q u e f a c t i o n of p r a c t i c a l i n t e r e s t (response type 2 to type 3)


may exist' where minimum strength available w i l l be s t i l l substantial but
deformation to mobilize such strength could be excessive and therefore
unacceptable.

Such cases were not considered by Castro within the frame-

work of l i q u e f a c t i o n .

C y c l i c Loading Behaviour
I n i t i a l interest i n undrained c y c l i c loading behaviour of sand was
triggered by the extensive f a i l u r e associated with saturated sand during
Niigata and Alaska earthquakes of 1964. Consideration centered predominantly on the response of saturated sand under l e v e l ground, which w i l l
be subjected to reversing shear stresses on h o r i z o n t a l planes (Seed and
Lee, 1966).

The stress conditions on such s o i l elements are simulated i n

the laboratory by undrained c y c l i c simple shear or c y c l i c t r i a x i a l test


on i s o t r o p i c a l l y consolidated samples.

The samples were subjected to

constant amplitude c y c l i c shear stresses on h o r i z o n t a l plane i n simple


shear test or constant pulsating deviator loads i n the t r i a x i a l t e s t .

u.
Continued c y c l i c loading r e s u l t s i n the development of large s t r a i n and
s o i l i s said to have l i q u e f i e d .

C y c l i c shear stress or deviator

stress

amplitude which causes a s p e c i f i e d l e v e l of s t r a i n i n a fixed number of


stress cycles i s c a l l e d the resistance to l i q u e f a c t i o n .
L i q u e f a c t i o n i n c y c l i c loading has thus been defined as a s t r a i n
c r i t e r i o n with no attention paid to the mechanism which i s responsible
for the development of s t r a i n .

The phenomenon was c a l l e d l i q u e f a c t i o n

because during some stage of the c y c l i c loading with shear stress


r e v e r s a l , a transient state of zero e f f e c t i v e stress i s reached when the
applied shear stress i n sand i s zero.

Zero e f f e c t i v e stress i n sand

would imply zero shear resistance f o r a f r i c t i o n material and hence i t s


equivalence with a l i q u i d and the corresponding phenomenon l i q u e f a c t i o n .
The s t r a i n development during the increasing phase of the deviator

stress

i n a c y c l i c t r i a x i a l test a f t e r a state of zero e f f e c t i v e stress i s


reached i s i l l u s t r a t e d i n F i g . 2.4.

F i g . 2.4

I t may be noted that large deforma-

S t r a i n development on loading a f t e r the


attainment of transient state of zero
effective stress.

15.

tion developed i s not associated with s t r a i n s o f t e n i n g .


Undrained c y c l i c loading of sand causes a progressive increase i n
pore pressure and c y c l i c deformation i n saturated sand with increasing
number of c y c l e s , regardless of i t s r e l a t i v e density.

However, two

d i s t i n c t types of response may be obtained with regard to the development


of

strain.

In the f i r s t type of response, at some stage during c y c l i c

loading the sample undergoes l i q u e f a c t i o n .

Castro (1969) has shown cases

in which true l i q u e f a c t i o n developed much i n the same manner as those


1 2
observed under monotonic loading ( F i g .

2.5a).

Vaid and Chem (1983 ' ) ,

however, have shown cases of c y c l i c loading of sand wherein limited


l i q u e f a c t i o n developed In the same way as that observed i n type 2 and 3
response under monotonic loading ( F i g .

2.5b).

By making a detailed

observation of the development of pore pressure and s t r a i n not only at


the end of cycles of loading but also within cycles of l o a d i n g , they
c l a r i f i e d the possible mechanism of s t r a i n development during undrained
c y c l i c loading.
Vaid and Chem showed that s t r a i n softening associated with limited
l i q u e f a c t i o n i s I n i t i a t e d at a c r i t i c a l value of e f f e c t i v e stress r a t i o
(CSR) regardless of the void r a t i o or consolidation stress conditions of
sand.

Following the arrest of l i q u e f a c t i o n (or s t r a i n softening), the

subsequent unloading from the peak amplitude of c y c l i c deviator stress


causes large Increase i n pore pressure bringing the sample close to the
state of zero e f f e c t i v e s t r e s s , but with very l i t t l e change i n deformation ( F i g .

2.5b,c).

Reloading In the extension region of the stress

cycle causes the sample to undergo large deformation with i t s stress


state moving along the undrained f a i l u r e envelope.
now,

Subsequent unloading

from the peak amplitude of deviator stress on extension s i d e , once

16.

F i g . 2.5

C y c l i c loading behaviour of contractive sand true l i q u e f a c t i o n and limited l i q u e f a c t i o n .

17.
again brings the sample to a state of zero e f f e c t i v e s t r e s s , and further
reloading into the compression region again causes the stress state
moving along the f a i l u r e envelope with large deformation developed.
Repetition of t h i s loading and unloading process causes a progressive
increase i n c y c l i c deformation following l i m i t e d l i q u e f a c t i o n .

In such

type of response the accumulation of s t r a i n with loading cycle i s shown


schematically i n F i g . 2.5d.
In the second type of response, the sample develops progressive
increase i n pore pressure and c y c l i c deformation but at no stage i s
1 2
deformation associated with s t r a i n s o f t e n i n g .

Vaid and Chern (1983 ' )

observed that such a sample develops very small deformation as long as


i t s e f f e c t i v e stress state stays below the s t r e s s r a t i o corresponding to
the phase transformaton l i n e ( F i g . 2.6a,b).

S i g n i f i c a n t amount of

deformation i s accumulated only when the s t r e s s state crosses the PT l i n e


during the loading phase.

Unloading causes large increase i n pore

pressure bringing the sample close to the state of zero e f f e c t i v e s t r e s s ,


but with very l i t t l e change i n deformation.

Repetition of t h i s

phenomenon of s t r e s s state moving a l t e r n a t e l y into the region beyond the


PT l i n e s with cycles of loading ultimately r e s u l t s i n a transient state
of zero e f f e c t i v e s t r e s s , and i s responsible f o r further accumulation of
deformation at a much f a s t e r r a t e .

S t r a i n accumulation with cycles of

loading In t h i s type of response i s shown i n F i g . 2.6c.


In t h i s thesis the term l i q u e f a c t i o n w i l l be used only i f sand
deforms i n a s t r a i n softening manner regardless of the nature of loading
- monotonic or c y c l i c .

This d e f i n i t i o n i s consistent with that used by

Castro (1969) except that i t now encompasses l i m i t e d l i q u e f a c t i o n i n


a d d i t i o n to true l i q u e f a c t i o n .

The second type of response described

18.

N
F i g . 2.6

C y c l i c loading behaviour of d i l a t i v e sand cyclic mobility.

19.
above, In which the deformation developed during c y c l i c loading i s not
associated with s t r a i n softening, w i l l be c a l l e d c y c l i c mobility.
d e f i n i t i o n of c y c l i c mobility i s also a f t e r Castro (1969).

This

Thus i n the

type of c y c l i c loading response i l l u s t r a t e d i n F i g . 2.5,

the accumulation

of deformation i s p a r t l y due

partly to c y c l i c

mobility following limited


It may

to l i m i t e d l i q u e f a c t i o n and

liquefaction.

be pointed out that the progressive increase i n deformation

of serious magnitude can develop when there i s no shear stress


i n sand with a c e r t a i n l e v e l of s t a t i c shear.
such a sand, a state of transient
and

the association

becomes ambiguous.

reversal

During c y c l i c loading of

zero e f f e c t i v e stress i s never r e a l i z e d

of term " l i q u e f a c t i o n " to the response of this sand


Cyclic mobility i s a more appropriate term i n connec-

t i o n with the accumulation of a l l deformations under c y c l i c loading

not

associated with s t r a i n softening.


Since a s p e c i f i e d s t r a i n development during c y c l i c loading could be
due

to l i q u e f a c t i o n or c y c l i c mobility or the combination of two

2.5

and

2.6),

(Figs.

the term "resistance to l i q u e f a c t i o n " used to designate

resistance to c y c l i c loading w i l l herein be called resistance to s t r a i n


development under c y c l i c loading.

However, i f the s p e c i f i e d s t r a i n

development during c y c l i c loading i s exclusively

due

to

liquefaction

only, then the term resistance to l i q u e f a c t i o n w i l l be used.


s t r a i n development during c y c l i c loading i s due

If

the

to c y c l i c mobility o n l y ,

then resistance to c y c l i c mobility w i l l be used.

These d i s t i n c t i o n s

In

d e f i n i t i o n s are necessary because various factors affect l i q u e f a c t i o n


c y c l i c mobility response d i f f e r e n t l y (Castro, 1969;
1975;

Vaid and

Castro and

Poulos,

Chern, 1983 ' ).

Attempts to l i n k the monotonic and

c y c l i c loading behaviour have

and

20.
been confined only to the i l l u s t r a t i o n that s t r a i n softening occurs under
c y c l i c loading much i n the same manner as under monotonic loading.
Castro (1969) and Castro et a l . (1982) showed that the steady state l i n e
i s unique under monotonic and c y c l i c loading conditions, which implies
that the undrained stress paths have no e f f e c t on steady state l i n e .

1 2
study on one sand at one confining pressure by Vaid and Chern (1983

'.)

showed that the i n i t i a t i o n of s t r a i n softening under monotonic and

cyclic

loading occur at a unique value of e f f e c t i v e stress r a t i o .

Also

the

arrest of s t r a i n softening occurs at a stress r a t i o corresponding to the


phase transformation

line.

No comprehensive studies have been made to

make general prediction of sand behaviour under c y c l i c loading from the


known behaviour under monotonic loading.

The role of void r a t i o , confin-

ing pressure and s t a t i c shear on undrained c y c l i c loading behaviour are


not clear and often contradictory, because of a lack of recognition of
the mechanism of deformation under c y c l i c loading.

It i s the purpose of

these investigations to present a u n i f i e d approach for undrained response


of sand, which w i l l enable prediction of the type of undrained monotonic
and c y c l i c loading behaviour from the knowledge of the I n i t i a l state of
the sand and the superimposed shear l o a d i n g .

It i s also intended to

c l a r i f y the role of various factors influencing the undrained response of


saturated sand, including the e f f e c t s of p a r t i c l e

angularity.

21 .

CHAPTER 3
LABORATORY TESTING

3 .1

Test Apparatus

A l l tests were conducted using the t r i a x i a l apparatus.

The testing

system consists of an instrumented t r i a x i a l c e l l and a loading system.


The loading system i s capable of monotonic consolidation under anisotropic stress conditions and c y c l i c loading under stress or s t r a i n
controlled conditions.

3.1.1

T r i a x i a l Apparatus
A schematic layout of the t r i a x i a l t e s t i n g apparatus and the asso-

ciated instrumentation i s shown i n F i g . 3.1.

The t r i a x i a l c e l l

was

designed to test specimen with 6.4 cm diameter and 12.7 cm height.


It has long been recognized that f r i c t i o n l e s s end plattens cause
more uniform deformation throughout the specimen and hence y i e l d more
r e l i a b l e s o i l parameters.

Use of f r i c t i o n l e s s end plattens however, i s

often complicated by the development of non-uniform expansion i n the


sample over i t s height, apart from the d i f f i c u l t sample preparation
procedures involved and l a t e r a l s l i d i n g of sample o f f the platten during
testing.

Green (1969) performed a comprehensive study on the deformation

modes of a Belgium sand by using f r i c t i o n l e s s end p l a t t e n s .

He found

that the sample did not develop uniform l a t e r a l expansion during shear.
The sample expanded predominantly e i t h e r at the top or at the base,
depending on the sample preparation procedures used.

This non-uniform

expansion was also obtained by Rowe and Barden (1964), Lee (1966) and by

22.

Cyclic

Input

^Loading

Double

Acting

Frame

Air

Piston

CP

Trans

ZZ3

?
Recorder

Legend:
R)

F i g . 3.1

Schematic layout of t r i a x i a l

Pressure

Regulator

apparatus.

the writer i n preliminary t r i a l s using the f r i c t i o n l e s s ends.

The major

factor influencing the mode of deformation appears to be the difference


i n the sand contact at the top and bottom sample-platten Interfaces
(Green, 1969).

Although this may be reduced by forming a sample i n two

halves, as was done by Green, such a procedure i s not possible to use f o r


sample formed by the sedimentation technique.
Furthermore, most of the f r i c t i o n l e s s end plattens used have a
s l i g h t l y higher central portion for the porous disk i n order to accommodate the thickness of the membranes and the grease on the outer portion.
This technique serves to prevent the sample from s l i d i n g l a t e r a l l y off
the end p l a t t e n .

Such a protrusion of stone into the sand sample may

result i n a complex stress and s t r a i n pattern within the sample, and


hence may influence test results i n an unknown manner.
Comprehensive studies have been made by Lee (1978) and Lee and
Vernese (1978) on the influence of end r e s t r a i n t on the s t a t i c and c y c l i c
strength of sand.

I t was found that end r e s t r a i n t could have a s i g n i f i -

cant e f f e c t on s t a t i c and c y c l i c strength, but only i n d i l a t i v e dense


soil.

This effect appeared to be a d i r e c t function of d i l a t i o n tendency

of the s o i l .

For loose sand, l i t t l e or no e f f e c t of the type of end

restraint was found.

Such findings are also supported by recent studies

of Castro et a l . (1982) who investigated the e f f e c t of end r e s t r a i n t on


the e f f e c t i v e confining stress at steady state for two types of loose
sands.

No s i g n i f i c a n t difference i n r e s u l t s was found i f f r i c t i o n l e s s

ends were substituted for regular end plattens i n both sands.

Since the

major objective of the intended study i s the response of r e l a t i v e l y loose


sand, the choice was made i n favour of regular end plattens for simplic i t y of test procedure.

Nevertheless, the end r e s t r a i n t was kept to a

24.
minimum by using polished anodized plattens with a small central 2 cm
diameter porous discs for drainage.

3.1.2

Loading System
The loading system consists of two

and

the c y c l i c loading system.

described by Chern (1981) .


were made to f a c i l i t a t e

parts: the consolidation system

This system i s b a s i c a l l y similar to that

However, considerable additional Improvements

testing under high confining pressure and

various

anisotropic consolidation stress c o n d i t i o n s .

Consolidation System
In order to simulate the f i e l d consolidation stress condition more
c l o s e l y , p a r t i c u l a r l y under the sloping ground, an anisotropic consolidation system was

developed.

In the conventional method, anisotropic

consolidation i s either carried out incrementally

In steps, or the sample

i s consolidated i s o t r o p i c a l l y f i r s t and then deviator stress applied


under drained condition u n t i l the desired K
c

= al /a'
r a t i o i s obtained.
l c 3c

The newly designed system enables the s o i l sample to be

consolidated

i s o t r o p i c a l l y or a n i s o t r o p i c a l l y along any constant e f f e c t i v e stress


r a t i o path.

This system i s I l l u s t r a t e d schematically i n the lower l e f t

part of F i g . 3.2, whereas the d e t a i l s are shown i n F i g .

3.3.

The consolidation system consists of a motorized pressure regulator,


a pressure amplifier ( i f higher confining pressures are needed), a posit i v e and negative bias relay and an adjustable ratio r e l a y .

In operating

the system, an i d e n t i c a l signal pressure, s, from the motorized regulator


i s fed Into the pressure amplifier and

the bias r e l a y .

The

pressure

a m p l i f i e r simply magnifies the s i g n a l pressure by a constant r a t i o m (=

Function

Elect.

Signal

Generator

I > I
E / P
Transducer

Ratio
Relay

Volume
Booster

Cyclic

Output

to Top Chamber
of Air PiJfon

Precision
Gage

Regulated
Air

Supply

Steady

F i g . 3.2

Schematic layout of loading system.

To

Bottom

of

Air

Output
Chambe
Piston

Pressure
Regulator

To Triaxial

Motomatlc

Motor

Generator

Speed

Control

Unit

Chamber

M
Pressure
Amp
Adjustable'
Ratio
Relay

Bios

To

Valve

or

Air

B
Piston

Relay

P ' S
P

F i g . 3.3

+
RP

K
'

R(S

K)

Detailed layout of consolidation system.

N)

4.167

i n system designed) before feeding the output pressure Into the

triaxial chamber as cell pressure O j , i.e.,

a3 = m s

The bias relay adds a constant K (continuously adjustable) to the signal


pressure and outputs a pressure

p = s + K.

The pressure p when fed through the ratio relay gets multiplied by a
factor R (continuously adjustable) and the output pressure

Pl

= R(s + K)

Is fed to the top chamber of the air loading piston, either directly or
through a volume booster.
For the given signal pressure s, the vertical stress

on the

sample Is given by (see Fig. 3.1)

=
s

In which

[R(s + K)AX - p 2 A 2 - msAr] + m s

(3.1)

sample area,
s

area of top chamber of air loading piston,


area of bottom chamber of a i r loading piston,

area of the loading ram,


r

P2

steady input to the bottom chamber of air loading


piston.

28.
If the consolidation is desired under a Kc value, incremental changes
in a| and o*^ are related by

Now

Aa.'/Ao-; = K
1
3
c

(3.2)

Ao| = Lal

(3.3)

- Au

Ao^ = mAs - Au

(3.4)

Under drained conditions u = constant and thus Au = 0.

Therefore, from

Eqs. 3-2, 3-3 and 3-4,

AO,' = mAs K

(3.5)

Substituting for Ao^ from Eq. 3-1 into Eq. 3-5, we get

(RAsAj - A p A - mAsA^) + mAs = mAs K


2

(3.6)

If p2 is held constant, Ap2 = 0 and Eq. 3-6 reduces to

1
^ - (RA,
- mA ) + m = m K
A
r
c
s

(3.7)

from which the value of ratio relay R factor can be obtained in terms of
the system constants for the desired

value.

In this Investigation,

the input pressure p2 in the bottom chamber of the air loading piston and
the back pressure u were maintained constant.

Therefore, knowing R

factor of the ratio relay, the K factor of the bias relay can be obtained

29.

from the relationship a' = K


1

a'

i.e.,

^ [R(s + K)AX - p2A2 - msA ] + ms - u = K (ms-u)


s

(3.8)

For any value of signal pressure s. Once the constant R on the ratio
relay and constant K on the bias relay are selected, the sample can be
consolidated continuously along the desired constant

ratio path.

A cohesionless s o i l sample has to be set up with some finite


confinement, which makes i t s i n i t i a l effective stress state hydrostatic.
This hydrostatic stress was kept to a practical minimum of about 0.2
2

kgf/cm

(19.6 kPa) following the application of back pressure and prior

to initiating the consolidation phase of loading.

In order to avoid

sudden change of stress state from i n i t i a l hydrostatic stress of about


2

0.2 kgf/cm

(19.6 kPa) to the anisotropic stress condition, which may

cause sudden buildup of excess pore presure and cause collapse of loose
sample, the consolidation stress path was brought to approach the desired
K path during the i n i t i a l stage of consolidation (see Fig. 3.4).
c

This

is done by opening the valve B slowly and admitting the pressure p^, to
the air piston slowly.

Cyclic Loading System


Cyclic loading i s applied by means of an electro-pneumatic (E/P)
transducer driven by a function generator (Fig. 3.2).

Due to the limited

output pressure capability of the E/P transducers, an adjustable ratio


relay was installed to magnify this pressure.

Any desired cyclic load

amplitude can be obtained by appropriate combination of piston size and


multiplication factor of the ratio relay.

16.0

4 ^

4.0

BO

12.0

16.0

20.0

1/2 ((J,'+ <%)

F i g . 3.4

+S
24.0

28.0

32.0

36.0

40.0

IkQf/cm*)

Anisotropic consolidation stress paths.

OJ

31.
In order to maintain a constant c y c l i c load amplitude when large
sample deformation develops, a 1:1 pressure r a t i o volume booster relay
was i n s t a l l e d on both top and bottom chambers of the a i r p i s t o n .

A large

increase i n a i r flow rate and exhausting rate reduced greatly the degradation of c y c l i c load pulse when large deformation

developed.

After consolidation was completed, the pressure i n the top chamber


of

the a i r piston was transferred to the c y c l i c loading system.

With

valve C closed, the pressure i n the c y c l i c loading system was increased


to

the value equals to that i n the consolidation system using the DC-

o f f s e t on the function generator.

A smooth transfer was then made by

c l o s i n g valve B and opening valve C.

3.2

Testing Procedures

3.2.1

Sample Preparation and Saturation

Test samples were formed by p l u v i a t i n g sand i n deaired water which


filled

the sample cavity formed by a membrane lined s p l i t mold.

While

depositing sand, the t i p of the pouring nozzle was always submerged and
maintained at a constant height of about 1 cm above the sedimented sand
surface.

The pouring t i p was traversed l a t e r a l l y over the plan area of

sample In order to form a loose uniform sand d e p o s i t . A l l samples were


formed loose i n this manner. Higher i n i t i a l d e n s i t i e s , i f required, were
obtained by d e n s i f i c a t i o n after the loading cap was i n place.

Densifica-

tion was achieved by tappings on the base of the t r i a x i a l c e l l with a


soft hammer while maintaining a gentle pressure on the loading cap.

The

d e t a i l e d sample preparation techniques have been described previously by


Chern (1981).

These techniques are believed to y i e l d samples of uniform

32.
density throughout (Vaid and F i n n , 1979).
During the process of sample set up i n the loading frame and checking

f o r saturation, the main emphasis was to f i r s t bring a l l samples to a

state of constant e f f e c t i v e stress p r i o r to consolidation.


e f f e c t i v e stress was about 0.2 kgf/cm
ing

This value of

(19.6 kPa), which was the confin-

pressure after the sample was formed.

The careful sample preparation

technique, which involved sedimentation by mutual transfer of sand with


water without contacting a i r , resulted In v i r t u a l l y saturated samples
with B value greater than 0.99.
Other sample preparation techniques, e.g., moist or dry compaction,
frequently give r i s e to nonuniformities i n density over the height of the
sample (Castro, 1969).
to

Moreover, they require a p p l i c a t i o n of f u l l vacuum

the sample i n order to remove the a i r trapped to f a c i l i t a t e

with high back pressure.

saturation

Such procedures r e s u l t i n unknown volume

changes i n the samples and hence an uncertainty i n the estimation of void


r a t i o of the sample.

Furthermore, c e l l pressure has to be applied before

the sample i s percolated with water i n order to dissolve or drive out the
a i r trapped i n the sample.

Thus, the sample f i r s t experiences an effec-

t i v e stress of more than 1.0 kgf/cm

(98 kPa) depending on the l e v e l of

c e l l pressure applied, followed by a loss of t h i s e f f e c t i v e stress when


vacuum i s released at one end during the process of saturation.

Hence

the sample gets consolidated and then rebounded causing stress h i s t o r y


effects i n addition to unknown volume changes.

This volume change may be

s i g n i f i c a n t when the water i s allowed to percolate into the sample.

Very

large volume change can take place e s p e c i a l l y i f the sand contains some
fines.

In any case, the exact amount of volume change i s d i f f i c u l t to

estimate due to Inherent anisotropy of the pluviated samples even

33.

though the a x i a l deformation, i s monitored.


The sample preparation technique adopted i n this i n v e s t i g a t i o n i s
believed to y i e l d more uniform samples, the e f f e c t i v e stress p r i o r to
initiating

consolidation was kept i d e n t i c a l i n a l l samples at a very low


2

value (0.2 kgf/cra ) and no a r b i t r a r y e f f e c t i v e stress h i s t o r y was


imparted to the samples.
e f f e c t i v e stress s t a t e .
was

Consolidation was

started from this i n i t i a l

A complete record of volume changes of samples

kept and hence errors i n the estimation of void r a t i o at the end of

consolidation were eliminated.

Such e r r o r s , together with those associ-

ated with sample preparation by tamping, are e s p e c i a l l y Important In the


study of undrained response of loose samples under r e l a t i v e l y
consolidation

low

pressure.

A f t e r the sample had been saturated, the t r i a x i a l c e l l was


on the loading platform, and the sample loading ram was
loading piston rod.

The sample was

now

tropic consolidation, i f required, was


sure and a x i a l load simultaneously
Section 3.1.2.

connected to the

ready for consolidation.

Aniso-

achieved by r a i s i n g the c e l l pres-

i n a preset r a t i o as described i n

The c e l l pressure was

about 0.5 kgf/cm

centered

increased at a constant rate of

(49 kPa) per minute by the motorized regulator u n t i l

the desired c e l l pressure was

achieved.

During the process of consolida-

t i o n , the volume change, a x i a l deformation and a x i a l load were monitored


at discrete levels of confining pressure.
t i o n stress path f o r Kc
3.4.

r a t i o of 2.0

A t y p i c a l monotonic consolida-

i s i l l u s t r a t e d by path 3 i n F i g .

In the conventional procedure of anisotropic consolidation, the

sample would be f i r s t consolidated i s o t r o p i c a l l y and then sheared under


drained condition to the desired value of K

r a t i o . This i s generally
c
carried out i n one step or i n multiple steps as i l l u s t r a t e d by paths 1

34.
and 2 respectively i n F i g . 3.4.

A monotonic anisotropic consolidation Is

superior to the conventional technique, because of the possible influence


of stress path during consolidation on the subsequent undrained
behaviour.
When the consolidation pressure reached the desired value, the
drainage l i n e was

kept open for a period of time u n t i l the secondary

consolidation, i f any, was

complete.

The

time required for this phase

depends on the type and the l e v e l of consolidation stress used.


rounded and angular sands consolidated
this waiting period was

very short.

For both

to low consolidation pressure,

However, for angular t a i l i n g s sand

under high consolidation s t r e s s e s , a period of more than 20 minutes


elapsed before the volume change got s t a b i l i z e d .
the sample was

During consolidation,

always kept under stress c o n t r o l l e d condition u n t i l the

next stage of loading.

3.2.2

Methods of Loading
Two

types of t e s t s , i . e . , monotonic and c y c l i c loading t e s t , were

performed i n order to study the undrained behaviour of sands.

In each

type of t e s t , either s t r a i n c o n t r o l l e d or stress controlled loading


applied.

was

A l l tests were performed using the conventional t r i a x i a l stress

path, i . e . , the c e l l pressure was

maintained constant during shear.

Undrained Monotonic Loading


Generally, undrained s t r a i n softening behaviour has been studied
testing samples under stress c o n t r o l l e d conditions
et a l . , 1982).

(Castro, 1969;

by

Castro

The dead weight system or a i r piston loading system can

be used for this purpose.

35.

It was

found that the dead weight system i s not suitable for

investigating behaviour of sand that developed limited l i q u e f a c t i o n .


This i s due to the Impact on the sample a f t e r occurrence of steady state
deformation and the sample moving beyond the state of PT with accompanied
increase i n i t s r e s i s t a n c e . The impact force on the sample was
the large i n e r t i a force i n dead weights at PT s t a t e .

due to

As an example, the

actual load acting on the sample during and a f t e r s t r a i n softening i s


shown i n F i g . 3.5
tion.

together with pore pressure response and a x i a l deforma-

High frequency vibrations occurred i n the sample, causing a

complicated

s t r e s s - s t r a i n history a f t e r steady state deformation.

The

data for this test were recorded on an o s c i l l o g r a p h i c recorder.


In contrast to the dead weight system, a i r piston loading i s a low
i n e r t i a system.

Such a loading system was

found to influence the test

results If sand undergoes s t r a i n softening on account of i n t e r a c t i o n of


sample c h a r a c t e r i s t i c s with that of the loading system.

I t was

found

that the steady state strength and s t r a i n p o t e n t i a l (amount of s t r a i n


from peak u n t i l PT state) could vary depending on the piston s i z e ,
position of the piston cylinder and the presence of volume booster.

An

example of such an Interaction Is i l l u s t r a t e d by the r e s u l t s of tests on


two i d e n t i c a l sand samples i n F i g .

3.6.

The samples were loaded

i d e n t i c a l l y except that for one sample the volume of a i r i n the a i r


piston prior to the occurrence of s t r a i n softening response was larger
than for the other.
I t was

found i n preliminary studies that the steady state strength

and s t r a i n p o t e n t i a l obtained under s t r a i n controlled conditions were


comparable to those obtained using the dead weight system.
observed by Castro et a l . (1982).

This was

For these reasons, a l l monotonic

also

36.

40.0

Time
Fig. 3.5

Undrained monotonic loading response with limited


liquefaction using dead weight loading.

37.

Ottawa Sand
2.0

A i r Volume in Piston

0.700
0.701
1.6

small
large

C ' 2.0 k g f / c m

3 c

.9 1.2

\ 3 0.8

0.4

2.0

F i g . 3.6

4.0

6.0

8.0

10.0

12.0

Influence of the pneumatic loading system on the


s t r a i n softening behaviour.

38.
loading tests were performed by using s t r a i n controlled loading system.
However, i t should be noted that the Interaction of the sample with the
stress c o n t r o l l e d loading system occurs i n samples which developed s t r a i n
softening response only.

For samples which developedstrain hardening

response, both the stress c o n t r o l l e d and s t r a i n controlled tests should


y i e l d the same r e s u l t .
After consolidation was completed, the loading platform was raised
or lowered u n t i l the piston rod contacted

the loading crosshead.

With

drainage l i n e closed, the sample was loaded monotonically under s t r a i n


controlled conditions.
used i n a l l t e s t s .

A x i a l s t r a i n rate of about 1.0% per minute was

During the process of loading, a x i a l load, pore

pressure, c e l l pressure and a x i a l deformation were monitored

continuously

by transducers and records obtained on a four pen chart recorder.

Undrained C y c l i c Loading
C y c l i c loading tests were performed i n order to obtain the e f f e c t i v e
confining stress and shear strength at PT state under c y c l i c loading
condition, and also to assess the resistance to c y c l i c loading i n terms
of s t r a i n development.
For reasons described above, only s t r a i n c o n t r o l l e d loading was used
to obtain the steady state strength parameters under c y c l i c loading.

It

was achieved manually by loading and unloading i n the s t r a i n controlled


machine maintaining

constant stress amplitudes.

The s t r a i n rate used i n

these t e s t s was s i m i l a r to that used i n the monotonic loading t e s t s .

3.3

Testing Program
Four types of t r i a x i a l tests were performed:

39,
1.

IC-U

- I s o t r o p i c a l l y Consolidated Undrained Monotonic Loading


Tests.

2.

AC-U

- A n i s o t r o p i c a l l y Consolidated Undrained Monotonic Loading


Tests.

3.

IC-U

- I s o t r o p i c a l l y Consolidated Undrained C y c l i c Loading T e s t s .

4.

AC-U

- A n i s o t r o p i c a l l y Consolidated Undrained C y c l i c Loading


Tests.

Most of the monotonic loading t e s t s were performed i n the compression mode.

However, a,limited number of monotonic loading tests were

also c a r r i e d out i n the extension mode i n order to i l l u s t r a t e possible


differences due to the two modes of loading.

The main purpose of this

t e s t i n g program was to e s t a b l i s h a u n i f i e d picture of the undrained


behaviour of sand under monotonic and c y c l i c loading conditions, and the
manner i n which the void ratio,, consolidation stress r a t i o , l e v e l of
confining pressure and amplitude of c y c l i c loading influence this
behaviour.

Tests were c a r r i e d out on samples having the same i n i t i a l

void r a t i o while varying the consolidation stress r a t i o K c and confining


pressure l e v e l -c

Five series of test with i n i t i a l r e l a t i v e denstiy

varying from 15% to 70% for angular t a i l i n g s sand and three series of
test with i n i t i a l r e l a t i v e density varying from 30% to 45% f o r rounded
Ottawa sand were performed.

The consolidation stress r a t i o s were varied

from 1.0 to 2.0 under wide range of consolidation pressure from 2.0
kgf/cm

(196 kPa) to 25.0 kgf/cm

(2450 kPa).

Two types of c y c l i c loading t e s t were performed.

One type of tests

were carried out to examine, under c y c l i c loading conditions, the a p p l i c a b i l i t y of steady state concept established under monotonic loading
condition.

In order to observe the steady state deformation under c y c l i c

40.
loading condition, only i n i t i a l l y loose samples consolidated

to K

ratio
c

of 2.0 and

subjected to consolidation pressure ranging from 2.0


kgf/cm

(196 kPa)

to 25.0

(2450 kPa)

explained

previously, these tests were carried out under s t r a i n

kgf/cm

were tested for both sands.

As

controlled conditions i n order to eliminate the influence of sample


c h a r a c t e r i s t i c s - loading system i n t e r a c t i o n on test r e s u l t s .

The

other

type of tests were carried out to obtain the resistance to c y c l i c s t r a i n


development or c y c l i c m o b i l i t y .

These tests were performed using

conventional stress controlled c y c l i c loading technique.


two series of tests were performed.

In one

For each sand,

s e r i e s , the sample states

a f t e r consolidation were so chosen that steady state deformation


expected under monotonic loading c o n d i t i o n .

was

These tests consisted of

sample with the same void r a t i o a f t e r consolidation and


stress a l while the consolidation stress r a t i o K was
3c
c
2.0.

the

consolidation
varied from 1.0

to

In the second s e r i e s , the sample states a f t e r consolidation were

chosen such that they were well below the steady state l i n e from
monotonic loading tests and hence no l i q u e f a c t i o n but the development of
c y c l i c mobility was

anticipated.

Again, the samples were prepared with

the same void r a t i o after consolidation and consolidation stress a'


3c
while the consolidation stress r a t i o K was varied from 1.0 to 2.0.
c
main purpose of these two series of tests was

The

to show the influence of

s t a t i c shear on resistance to l i q u e f a c t i o n and c y c l i c m o b i l i t y .


In addition, several tests were performed to simulate the phenomenon
of spontaneous l i q u e f a c t i o n . The d e t a i l s of such t e s t i n g w i l l be given
i n Section

5.6.

41.
3.4

Material Tested

Two sands were used i n this laboratory testing program.

One was

Ottawa sand C-109, which has been used extensively i n the laboratory
studies of undrained c y c l i c loading behaviour at UBC and elsewhere.
other was a mine t a i l i n g s sand.
screened.

The

The t a i l i n g s sand was s p e c i a l l y

The f r a c t i o n retained on #60 sieve was v i r t u a l l y a l l quartz

and the grain size d i s t r i b u t i o n almost i d e n t i c a l to that of Ottawa sand.


Thus, the two sands represented sands which d i f f e r e d only i n t h e i r
p a r t i c l e shape, and therefore provided a d i r e c t assessment of the i n f l u ence of p a r t i c l e angularity on the undrained behaviour.

3.4.1

S o i l Description

Ottawa Sand
Ottawa sand i s a natural sand processed by Ottawa S i l i c a Company,
Ottawa, I l l i n o i s .

It meets the ASTM Designation C-109.

uniform, medium sand with rounded p a r t i c l e s .


of the sand i s shown i n F i g . 3.7.

It i s a c l e a n ,

The grain s i z e d i s t r i b u t i o n

The sand has a maximum and minimum

void r a t i o s of 0.82 and 0.50 r e s p e c t i v e l y , according to standard test


method ASTM D2049.

The lowest r e l a t i v e density of water pluviated sand

a f t e r i s o t r o p i c consolidation to a^c

= 2.0 kgf/cm

(196 kPa) was about

32.0%.

Mine T a i l i n g s Sand
Mine t a i l i n g s sand was obtained from a copper mining operation i n
Peachland, B r i t i s h Columbia.

It constituted the coarse f r a c t i o n used i n

b u i l d i n g the embankment f o r t a i l i n g s impoundment. The sand consists of

&
100

sE

Z E
+ m

an

Sand

Gravtl

Coaua

E
E ,
tm <> <

Medium

I *

80

Off

c-

iI
I

CoifM

Fin*

a >anc

- J )9

Tai lit g ; - A
Washet
thfou, 1 -it
Sievi
>

40

20

0
100 80

F i g . 3.7

40

20

10 8

1 0:8
Dumttcr (mm)

0.4

0.2

Grain s i z e d i s t r i b u t i o n curves of sands t e s t e d .

0.1

0.01

43.
about 80-85% of quartz, 10-15% of mica, traces of chalopyrite and
feldspar and has angular p a r t i c l e s .
The t a i l i g n s sand was

washed through #60

the fines and mica presented.

sieve i n order to remove

Removal of these fines brought both the

mineral composition and the gradation curve of the f r a c t i o n retained on


#60

sieve very s i m i l a r to that of the Ottawa sand C-109.

curve of the sand i s shown i n F i g . 3.7.


size d i s t r i b u t i o n of the two

It may

The

gradation

be noted that the grain

sands are e s s e n t i a l l y i d e n t i c a l .

This

permits the influence of p a r t i c l e angularity on undrained behaviour to b


isolated without introducing a d d i t i o n a l variables i n the form of gradat i o n and mineral content.

The maximum and minimum void r a t i o s of the

t a i l i n g s sand were found to be 1.060


standard test method ASTM D2049.

and 0.688 r e s p e c t i v e l y , according t

The loosest r e l a t i v e density of water

pluviated sand a f t e r Isotropic consolidation to


kPa) was

3.4.2

=2.0

kgf/cm

(196

about 25.0%.

Consolidation C h a r a c t e r i s t i c s
The consolidation c h a r a c t e r i s t i c s of sands were determined at

several i n i t i a l void r a t i o s e^ and consolidation stress conditions.


The relationships between void r a t i o a f t e r consolidation e c and major
consolidation stress

for t a i l i n g s sand are shown i n F i g .

3.8.

Similar r e s u l t s for Ottawa sand are shown In F i g . 3.9.


It may

be noted that considerable

volume reduction occurs on a p p l i -

cation of high confining pressure during consolidation of angular t a i l ings sand ( F i g . 3.8).

However, the volume reduction i s much less for

rounded Ottawa sand under s i m i l a r stress l e v e l s .

Larger compressibility

of angular sand i s a consequence of easy breakage of sharp edges of

OTTAWA

0.80-

*/

SAND

1.0

0.725 O
O 700 A
0.673

0.75-

10

20

20

. 30

0.70-

40
u
Q

30
c
Q

0.65 60

a,

4)

0.6C-

70 a:
80

0.53
90

0.30

0.2

Fig.

3.9

0.4

I I

0.6

0.8 10

Consolidation

Consolidation

1_
2.0

40

Stress,

60

8 0 10 0

0'lc (ka/cm )

characteristics of Ottawa sand.

200

40.0

60.0

L-

100

46.
p a r t i c l e s under high consolidation s t r e s s e s , which makes the p a r t i c l e s to
move into a more compact arrangement.
for

As expected, the volume reduction

a given stress increment decreases with increasing i n i t i a l density.

However, the consolidation curves with various i n i t i a l void ratios tend


to converge under high consolidation pressure.
apparent i n the case of t a i l i n g s sand.

This i s p a r t i c u l a r l y

It appears that under very high

confining pressure the f i n a l void r a t i o may be more or l e s s independent


of the i n i t i a l void ratio of the sample.
It may also be noted i n F i g s . 3.8 and 3.9 that f o r a given

initial

void ratio the f i n a l void r a t i o a f t e r consolidation i s a function only of


the major p r i n c i p a l consolidation s t r e s s Q^ > regardless of the c o n s o l i z

dation stress r a t i o K .
c

Such consolidation behaviour of sand has also

been observed f o r Sacramento River sand over an even larger range of


consolidation stress r a t i o and confining stress l e v e l by Lee and Seed
(1970).

This c h a r a c t e r i s t i c behaviour may be used to estimate the f i n a l

void r a t i o of sand after consolidation once the i n i t i a l void r a t i o and


consolidation stress conditions are known.

As w i l l be discussed i n

Section 5.1.4, the curves i n F i g s . 3.8 and 3.9 give a very good basis f o r
preparing samples to a desired f i n a l void r a t i o under a wide range of
consolidation stress conditions.

In this manner the f i n a l void r a t i o

could be reproduced with v a r i a t i o n of l e s s than 1.6% i n r e l a t i v e density.


For a given e., the unique e v s . a' consolidation c h a r a c t e r i s t i c s of
1
c
lc
sand may also have s i g n i f i c a n t importance i n determining the i n - s i t u void
r a t i o as construction proceeds i f the i n i t i a l placement void r a t i o can be
estimated.

This i s e s p e c i a l l y true i f the sand i s loose.

Sampling of

loose sand i s known to always cause d e n s i f i c a t i o n and hence gives higher


strength estimate, which could be unsafe f o r design purposes.

47,

It should be pointed out that the unique consolidation relationships


of sand discussed above are restricted for water pluviated sand and under
normal consolidation only. Other sample preparation procedures, e.g.,
moist tamping, dry compaction, etc., which may impart to the sample a
complex stress history, may not result in such relationships. This will
be especially critical for a sand with rounded particles in which the
total volume change during consolidation is generally very small.

48.

CHAPTER 4
UNDRAINED MONOTONIC LOADING BEHAVIOUR
I

Undrained t r i a x i a l compression tests were carried out on both sands


using confining pressure

ranging from 2.0 to 25.0 kgf/cm

2450 kPa) and K values from 1.0 to 2.0.

(196 to

For each sand, samples were

formed at a fixed i n i t i a l void r a t i o e^ and a series of tests performed


after consolidation to various l e v e l s of a' and K values.
3c
c

Similar

series of tests were then repeated on samples formed at another f i x e d


i n i t i a l void r a t i o .

In t h i s manner, f i v e i n i t i a l void r a t i o states f o r

t a i l i n g s sand and three i n i t i a l void r a t i o states f o r Ottawa sand were


covered.

This enabled i n v e s t i g a t i o n of undrained behaviour which covered

v
a f u l l spectrum
of i n i t i a l states e , 0 ' and K , of sand.
c'
3c
c

Only limited number of tests were performed under t r i a x i a l extension


mode. The objective was to show possible influence of loading path on
the undrained behaviour.

4.1

Typical Undrained Monotonic Loading Behaviour

Stress-strain and pore pressure response together with e f f e c t i v e


stress paths f o r some selected tests on both sands incorporating a range
of end of consolidation states are shown i n Figures 4.1 to 4.10.

It may

be noted that the range of observed undrained response covers the f u l l


range of behaviour described by type 1 to 5 i n Chapter 2.

In the subse-

quent discussions, the magnitude of a x i a l s t r a i n from peak u n t i l the


phase transformaton state ( s t a r t of pore pressure decrease) f o r s t r a i n
softening response w i l l be designated as s t r a i n p o t e n t i a l . With this

49.

d e f i n i t i o n , true l i q u e f a c t i o n corresponds to an unlimited s t r a i n


potential.

T a i l i n g s Sand Test Results


T y p i c a l s t r e s s - s t r a i n and pore pressure response of i n i t i a l l y

loose

samples of t a i l i n g s sand consolidated to low (2.0 kgf/cm ), moderate (8.0


2

kgf/cm ), and high (25.0 kgf/cm ) confining pressures o'


JC
Fig.
Fig.

4.1a,b,c.

The corresponding

are shown i n

e f f e c t i v e stress paths are shown i n

4.2.
I s o t r o p i c a l l y consolidated sample under low confining pressure did

not develop s t r a i n softening response ( F i g . 4.1a)


tive density was

only 25%.

even though the r e l a -

Instead, the sample developed a deviator

stress plateau over a small range of s t r a i n before the shear resistance


started increasing once again due to d i l a t i o n with further s t r a i n i n g .
may

It

also be seen that the s t r e s s - s t r a i n curve a f t e r the plateau was much

f l a t t e r than that i n the i n i t i a l stage of loading.

This i s the t y p i c a l

type 4 response described i n Chapter 2.


A n i s o t r o p i c a l l y consolidated sample under the same confining pressure, on the other hand, developed a s l i g h t s t r a i n softening even though
i t s r e l a t i v e density was
sample ( F i g . 4.1a).

higher than that of i s o t o p i c a l l y consolidated

Small s t r a i n softening was

s t r a i n p o t e n t i a l of less than 2%.

associated with a small

The sample deformed i n a manner char-

acterized as l i m i t e d l i q u e f a c t i o n , except that the s t r a i n p o t e n t i a l was


very small.

This i s the t y p i c a l type 3 response described i n Chapter 2.

When the confining pressure was

increased to 8.0 kgf/cm

(784

kPa),

both i s o t r o p i c a l l y and a n i s o t r o p i c a l l y consolidated samples developed


s t r a i n softening response ( F i g . 4.1b)

even though r e l a t i v e densities were

50.

Tailings Sand

03c''2.0

kgf/cm

e, =1.000
e =0.965
c

D =16.1%
D = 25.5%
rl

rc

&X =2.0
e

e, =0.997
e =0.948
c

D , =16.9%
D =30./%
r

rf:

12.0

Fig. 4 . 1 a

Undrained monotonic compression loading behaviour of


i n i t i a l l y loose t a i l i n g s sand under low confining pressure.

10.0-

8.0 -

6.0
CM

oi

Tailings

4.0

Sand
2

O3J = 8.0 kgf/cm


KC * '.0
Dr)
e; =0.999
ec =0.9/i
Ore
Ke =2.0
e, --0.992
ec =0.87/
0
rc

2.0

2.0

4.0

6.0

8.0

10.0

=16.4%
=40.1%
= 18.3%
= 50.8%

_i
12.0

14.0

F i g . 4.1b Undrained monotonic compression loading behaviour of i n i t i a l l y


loose t a i l i n g s sand under moderate confining pressure.

52.

Tailings Sand
0 > . 25.0

kgf/cm

3c

LO
LOU
e '0.827
Kc -2.0

40.0"

ri *

e*/.004 D
e - 0,738

F i g . 4.1c

4.0

13.2%

' 62.6 %

2.0

6.0

13.1 %
Drc '86.6%

6,

8.0

/0.0

/2.0

14.0

16.0

Undrained monotonic compression loading behaviour of i n i t i a l l y


loose t a i l i n g s sand under high confining pressure.

Tailings Sand
e(- '1.00

Drj -16.1%

Kc -2.0

l/2(0,'+0 ')
3

(kgf/cm )
2

OJ

F i g . 4.2

Effective stress paths of undrained monotonic compression


loading response of i n i t i a l l y loose t a i l i n g s sand.

54.
much higher than those under the lower confining pressure. Both samples
deformed i n the same manner with steady state conditions over a moderate
range of s t r a i n , before regaining strength due to d i l a t i o n with further
straining.

These correspond to type 2 response described i n Chapter 2.

It may be noted that a n i s o t r o p i c a l l y consolidated sample, which simulates


s o i l element with i n i t i a l shear b i a s , developed more severe loss of
strength and larger s t r a i n p o t e n t i a l than the i s o t r o p i c a l l y consolidated
one, even though i t s f i n a l r e l a t i v e density was higher.

Furthermore, i t s

shear resistance during steady state was s l i g h t l y less than the i n i t i a l


s t a t i c shear stress after c o n s o l i d a t i o n .
Under high confining pressure of 25.0 kgf/cm

(2450 kPa), both

samples behaved i n a manner s i m i l a r to those under moderate confining


pressure (Fig.

4.1c).

Despite t h e i r much higher r e l a t i v e d e n s i t i e s ,

they developed a severe loss of shear resistance and larger s t r a i n


p o t e n t i a l than samples at moderate confining pressure. The loss i n
resistance was e s p e c i a l l y severe f o r a n i s o t r o p i c a l l y consolidated sample.
Its

shear resistance

was reduced to a value considerably less than the

i n i t i a l s t a t i c shear s t r e s s , and the sample deformed continuously with


unlimited s t r a i n p o t e n t i a l .

Although the r e l a t i v e density i s very high

(86.6%), i t s behaviour i s the same as the true l i q u e f a c t i o n developed i n


very loose sand (type 1 response), with the difference that r e l a t i v e l y
high shear resistance was s t i l l retained during steady state deformation.
Typical s t r e s s - s t r a i n and pore pressure responses of i n i t i a l l y

dense

samples under moderate and high confining pressures i s shown i n F i g .


4.3a,b and the e f f e c t i v e stress paths i n F i g . 4.4.
I s o t r o p i c a l l y consolidated sample under moderate confining pressure
of 8.0 kgf/cm

(784 kPa) developed type 5 s t r a i n hardening response ( F i g .

55.

F i g . 4.3a

Undrained monotonic compression loading behaviour of i n i t i a l l y


dense t a i l i n g s sand under moderate confining pressure.

Tailings Sand
Cc

25.0 kgf/crn?

- LO
e, "0.804
e '0.725

D "68.8%
D -90./%
ri

rc

12.0

F i g . 4.3b

Undrained monotonic compression loading behaviour of i n i t i a l l y


dense t a i l i n g s sand under high confining pressure.

Tailings Sand
e

- 0 . 8 0 0

F i g . 4.4

Drl

70.0%

Effective stress paths of undrained monotonic compression


loading response of i n i t i a l l y dense t a i l i n g s sand.

58.
4.3a), whereas a n i s o t r o p i c a l l y consolidated sample developed type 4
response.

When the confining pressure was increased to 25.0 kgf/cm

(2450 kPa), both I s o t r o p i c a l l y and a n i s o t r o p i c a l l y consolidated samples


developed more contractive tendancy even though their r e l a t i v e densities
were much higher than those under moderate confining pressure.

For iso-

t r o p i c a l l y consolidated samples, the response changed from type 5 under


moderate confining pressure to type 4 under high confining pressure,
while that of a n i s o t r o p i c a l l y consolidated samples transformed from type
4 to type 2 as the confining pressure increased by the same magnitude.
Typical test results f o r an i n i t i a l l y loose sample under low confining

pressure of 1.84 kgf/cm

(180 kPa) subjected to monotonic extension

loading are shown i n F i g . 4.5. The sample developed s t r a i n softening


response unlike s i m i l a r sample with the same i n i t i a l sample state but
subjected to compression
4.1a).

loading, which developed

type 4 response ( F i g .

The sample loaded i n extension experienced severe loss of shear

resistance with accompanying large s t r a i n potential before i t regained


i t s strength due to d i l a t i o n with further s t r a i n i n g .

Ottawa Sand Test Results


Typical s t r e s s - s t r a i n and pore pressure response of i n i t i a l y

loose

samples of Ottawa sand consolidated to low and high confining pressures


are shown i n F i g . 4.6a,b.

The corresponding e f f e c t i v e stress paths are

shown i n F i g . 4.7.
In contrast to the behaviour of t a i l i n g s sand, a l l i n i t i a l l y loose
samples of Ottawa sand developed s t r a i n softening response with
cant s t r a i n p o t e n t i a l f o r the range of confining pressure and K c
considered.

signifiratio

Strain softening i s p a r t i c u l a r l y severe under low confining

59.

Tailings Sand
O' - 1.84 kgf/cm

12.0

l/2{6{+
0

6"

1-0

0.5

o y ;
1.0

(kgf/cm )
1.5

2.0

F i g . 4.5

Undrained monotonic extension loading behaviour


of i n i t i a l l y loose t a i l i n g s sand.

60.

Ottawa Sand
a 3c ' -2.0 kgf/cm

K
e;

e
K
e;
e
c

' L O
'0.725

Dri

-0.7/2
-2.0
-0.72/
-0.703

Drc

'29.7%

-33.8%

Dri - 3 0 . 9 %
Drc =36.6%

2.0

4.0

6.0

8.0

/0.0

/2.0

/4.0

(%)

S (%)
a

F i g . 4.6a

Undrained monotonic compression loading behaviour of i n i t i a l l y


loose Ottawa sand under low confining pressure.

61.

Ottawa Sand
25.0

3c'

Kg/cm

LO
e-, =0.728D =28.8%
e =0.68/
D =43.4%
K -2.0
e; =0.723 D =30.3%
e =0.667 D =47.8%
ri

40.01-

rc

ri

rc

F i g . 4.6b Undrained monotonic compression loading behaviour of


i n i t i a l l y loose Ottawa sand under high confining pressure.

Ottawa Sand
e =0.725 D =30.0%
}

ri

i/2(Oi'+03')

(Kgf/cm )
ON

N>

F i g . 4.7

E f f e c t i v e stress paths of monotonic compression loading response


of i n i t i a l l y loose Ottawa sand.

63.
pressure ( F i g .

4.6a).

The sand l o s t much greater percentage of i t s

resistance and developed much larger s t r a i n potential than those under


high confining pressure. A l l samples developed type 2 response, which i s
t y p i c a l of limited l i q u e f a c t i o n , and no type 1 response t y p i c a l of true
l i q u e f a c t i o n was
For

observed.

samples densified to I n i t i a l r e l a t i v e density of 45%, however,

completely d i f f e r e n t responses compared to those of the i n i t i a l l y loose


states were obtained.

Instead of developing s t r a i n softening response,

a l l samples developed s t r a i n hardening or type 4 response, regardless of


the confining pressure. T y p i c a l t e s t r e s u l t s f o r such response are shown
i n F i g s . 4.8a,b and

4.9.

Typical test r e s u l t s for an i n i t i a l l y medium dense sample under a


confining pressure of 8.0 kgf/cm

(784 kPa) and Kc

monotonic extension loading are shown i n F i g .

= 1.0 subjected to

4.10.

Similar to the

behaviour of t a i l i n g s sand, samples with states which developed s t r a i n


hardening response i n compression developed s t r a i n softening response
with s i g n i f i c a n t s t r a i n p o t e n t i a l under extension loading.

Comparison of T a i l i n g s and Ottawa Sand Response


From the test results of t a i l i n g s and Ottawa sands presented above,
i t may be noted that the s t r a i n softening and s t r a i n hardening behaviour
are

s i m i l a r f o r both sands.

However, there are important differences i n

the factors which control the occurrence of s t r a i n softening or s t r a i n


hardening response i n the two sands.

For t a i l i n g s sand, i t appears that

the confining pressure and consolidation stress r a t i o are the most


important f a c t o r s .

Samples with low r e l a t i v e density can develop s t r a i n

hardening response under low confining pressure and low K r a t i o ,

6k.

Fig.

4.

8a

Undrained monotonic compression loading behaviour of


i n i t i a l l y dense Ottawa sand under low confining pressure.

65.

e (%)
a

Fig

4.8b

Undrained monotonic compression loading behaviour of


i n i t i a l l y dense Ottawa sand under high confining pressure.

Ottawa Sand
e; =0.676 D = 45%
ri

1/2(a,'

+ 0 ')
3

(kgf/cm )
2

as

F i g . 4.9

Effective stress paths of monotonic compression loading response


of i n i t i a l l y dense Ottawa sand.

67.

OffawQ Sand
Tesf /C- U - # 4 5
0 ' =8.0 kgf/cm
e, =0.667 Dr ; =47.8%
s
e =0.647 Drc 54,1%
2

3c

8.0

6.0
CM

o
\

cn

4.0

< 2.0
eft

2.0

4.0

6.0

1/2(0,'+a ')
5

2.0

CM

E
o

F i g . 4.10

4.0

8.0

10.0

(kgf/cm )
6.0

8.0

10.0

Undrained monotonic extension loading behaviour


of i n i t i a l l y medium dense Ottawa sand.

68.
whereas samples even with high r e l a t i v e density can develop s t r a i n
softening response under high confining pressure and high K c r a t i o .

On

the other hand, r e l a t i v e density seems to be the most important factor


for

Ottawa sand.

A l l initially

loose samples developed s t r a i n softening

response over the range of confining pressure and Kc r a t i o considered,


and a l l samples densified to an I n i t i a l r e l a t i v e density large than about
45% developed s t r a i n hardening response, regardless of the confining
pressure and Kc r a t i o .

This difference i n the factors c o n t r o l l i n g the

undrained response of these two sands w i l l be discussed further i n


Section 4.2.
It may also be noted that the modes of loading influence the
undrained behaviour of both sands.

Sand at given r e l a t i v e density may be

safe against l i q u e f a c t i o n (limited or true) under monotonic compression


but may undergo l i q u e f a c t i o n under monotonic extension. The range of
r e l a t i v e density over which l i q u e f a c t i o n can be induced i n extension i s
larger than that i n compression under the s i m i l a r consolidation stress
conditions.

Also the degree of s t r a i n softening i s more severe i n exten-

sion than that i n compression under s i m i l a r i n i t i a l sample states.

These

c h a r a c t e r i s t i c s are true for both sands.

4.2

Strain Softening and Strain Hardening Responses

T r a d i t i o n a l l y , s t r a i n softening and s t r a i n hardening responses are


described by the shape of the s t r e s s - s t r a i n curve obtained.

In this way,

only q u a l i t a t i v e description as to the undrained behaviour, i . e . , softening

or hardening, can be obtained. Possible relationship of the type of

response either to the s o i l parameter during deformation or to i n i t i a l

69.

state (e , a' , K ) has not been Investigated


c' 3c' c

comprehensively.

In the

investigations reported herein, d i f f e r e n t types of response w i l l be


related to the sample state at phase transformation,
and

and peak, strength

to the i n i t i a l sample s t a t e .

4.2.1

C l a s s i f i c a t i o n of Undrained Responses
Test results r e l a t i n g void r a t i o a f t e r consolidation e c versus

e f f e c t i v e confining stress o"^ at phase transformation

state for t a i l i n g s

sand prepared at an i n i t i a l void r a t i o e^ of 0.90 are shown i n F i g .


4.11.

The r e l a t i o n s h i p between void r a t i o e c and consolidation stress

al which i s v a l i d for any value of K (see F i g . 3.8) i s also shown i n


lc
c
the f i g u r e .

Samples under low consolidation stresses, [ c > developed

s t r a i n hardening response.

As the void r a t i o e c decreases as a result

of increasing consolidation stresses, the samples started to develop


s l i g h t s t r a i n softening associated with small s t r a i n p o t e n t i a l . As the
consolidation stresses are increased

f u r t h e r , the samples developed

s t r a i n softening response with s i g n i f i c a n t (>2%) s t r a i n potential or even


true l i q u e f a c t i o n . It should be noted that data points In F i g . 4.11
contain results for samples consolidated

to various K c r a t i o s .

continuous unique relationship may be seen to exist between e^and a^


which describes

the f u l l spectrum of undrained response type 1 to type 5.

This continuous l i n e r e l a t i n g e and al


c
J

at PT state may be divided into

two d i s t i n c t regions of response, i . e . , s t r a i n hardening region and


s t r a i n softening region ( F i g . 4.11).

Due to the unique e ^ o ^ r e l a t i o n -

ship, these two regions of response can also be related uniquely to


consolidation stress al

lc

, regardless of the K

ratio.

In other words,

the undrained response i s uniquely related to consolidation stress a'

1.00

Tailings Sand
1.0
B

0.90"

Consolidation

1.5

20

Curve

(0.80-

0.75-

Note

Steady Stale
Transition
transformation
X State at phase
tor dilative response

070-

0.2

0.4
Effective

0.6
0.8 1.0
Confining
Stress

2.0
4.0
al PT State
oy
(kgf/cm )

6.0
8.0 10.0
20.0
or Effective
Consolidation

40.0
Stress CJ| '

60.0

F i g . 4.11

Relationship between e c and


at PT state for t a i l i n g s sand at
fixed e^ under undrained compression loading.

I.OOt

Tailings

e,
0.95h

1.0

1.0

095

0.90

0.85

0.80

Sand

20

(.5 2 . 0

30

40

0.90\
Consolidation
Curves ( e - Oj ')
c

50

0.651

Critical
Consolidation

Stress

I0, )
c

{60 Q
c r i t

\70

0.801

4
)
V

Note0 Steady
State
Transition

u
oo.TSf

{80 o
"5

XSfofe af phase
transformation for
dilative response

490

0.70H

woo

05L

0.2
Effective

OA

06

Confining

F i g . 4.12

08

10

Stress

20
O 3 ' o r Effective

40

6.0

Consolidation

a t

_J
L.
8.0 10 0

Stress

'110

20.0

400

Oj ' (kgf/cm )
2

Relationship between e c and


state f o r t a i l i n g s sand
with various e^ under undrained compression loading.

60.0

72.
which i s the product of K and al .
c
3c
Fig.

4.12 shows compilation of a l l test results r e l a t i n g e c and o\j

at PT state for t a i l i n g s sand with various i n i t i a l void r a t i o e^. The


relationship between e
figure.

v s . a' f o r various e. i s also shown i n the


c
Ic
i
It may be seen i n F i g . 4.12 that e - a l relationships for various
C

-5

e^ form a series of curves which merge into a unique l i n e below a c e r t a i n


e , depending on e. of the sand.
c
I

It i s found that t h i s unique l i n e

describes the behaviour of a l l samples which developed s t r a i n softening


resulting i n true liquefaction or limited l i q u e f a c t i o n with s i g n i f i c a n t
s t r a i n potential (greater than 2%), regardless of the e^ of the sand.
Thus, for those samples that developed limited l i q u e f a c t i o n , the
concept of a unique steady state l i n e proposed by Castro (1969) may be
used i n the same manner as f o r samples that develop true l i q u e f a c t i o n .
This steady state l i n e i s shown i n F i g . 4.12 by a darkened band. It
should be emphasized that this steady state l i n e comprises of results f o r
limited l i q u e f a c t i o n as well as true l i q u e f a c t i o n .
If the sand developed s l i g h t s t r a i n softening with s t r a i n
less than 2%, the & ~ 2
0

re

l a t i o n s h i p f o r each e^ starts to branch away

from the unique steady state l i n e .


state l i n e , these relationships
s t r a i n softening.

potential

Immediately to the l e f t of the steady

form a region characterized by s l i g h t

This i s shown by the dotted area i n F i g .

4.12 and Is

the region of t r a n s i t i o n from limited l i q u e f a c t i o n , which f i t s within the


concepts of unique steady state l i n e , into the region of s t r a i n hardening
response.

The dotted l i n e i n F i g . 4.12 which separates the regions of

s t r a i n hardening and s l i g h t s t r a i n softening response i s only approximate. A precise determination of t h i s l i n e would require a much more
comprehensive testing program.

73.
From F i g . 4.12,

i t may

be seeu that there e x i s t s a l i m i t i n g value of

consolidation stress cr!


for each e, such that sand with consolidation
lc
i
stress

greater than this value would always develop s t r a i n softening

response with s i g n i f i c a n t s t r a i n p o t e n t i a l and the


relationships f i t s the unique steady state l i n e .

e
c

~o"^ at PT state

Hereinafter this type

of response w i l l be c a l l e d l i q u e f a c t i o n . In contrast, samples with


consolidation stress

less than this c r i t i c a l value would always

develop either s t r a i n hardening or s l i g h t s t r a i n softening response and


the

e
c

T2

line.

a t

st

a t e relationship does not f i t the unique steady state

This l i m i t i n g value of consolidation stress w i l l be c a l l e d

c r i t i c a l consolidation stress (al )


, .
lc c r i t
f i v e e^, a relationship betwen e^ and
( a ^ c ) c r ^ t may

be obtained.

From the results for test at

c r i t i c a l consolidation stress

This i s shown i n F i g . 4.12

by the dashed l i n e

to the right but more or l e s s p a r a l l e l to the steady state l i n e .

It

may

be noted that (al ) . Increases with decreasing e .


lc c r i t
c
This c r i t i c a l consolidation stress (al )
. separates regions of
lc c r i t

I n i t i a l sample state (e , al ,'K ) which w i l l develop l i q u e f a c t i o n from


c
3c
c
those which w i l l not. Any sample with a state a f t e r consolidation l y i n g
on or to the right of (al ) . l i n e w i l l result i n l i q u e f a t i o n , otherlc c r i t
^
'
wise s l i g h t s t r a i n softening or s t r a i n hardening response w i l l be
developed.

n
(al ) . l i n e thus forms a quantitative
criterion for
lc c r i t

separating regions of l i q u e f a c t i o n from other types of response.


eliminates

It

the a r b i t r a r i n e s s of c r i t e r i o n proposed by Castro (1969) and

Castro and Poulos (1977), which s p e c i f i e s that the i n i t i a l state of sand


has to be well above and to the right of the steady state l i n e , i n order
to develop l i q u e f a c t i o n . It should be noted that

tf^is

the major

consolidation s t r e s s , which i s the product of minor consolidation stress

74.
0 ' and K r a t i o , i . e . , a' and K do not influence the l i q u e f a c t i o n
3c
c
3c
c
behaviour independently.
a!

Therefore, a l l sample states along the constant

path w i l l show the same response as long as conditions at PT state

It w i l l be shown l a t e r that sand with a given e and al ,

c
lc
with al > (al ) . w i l l result In the same peak undrained strength and
lc
lc crit
*
are concerned.

steady state strength under monotonic loading, regardless of the


individual value of al and K .
3c
c
The r e s u l t s of void r a t i o e versus e f f e c t i v e confining stress al at
c
J
PT state for Ottawa sand are shown i n F i g . 4.13. The relationships
between consolidation stress al and e f o r three i n i t i a l void ratios are
lc
c
also shown i n the f i g u r e .

As discussed

i n Section 4.1, a l l i n i t i a l l y

loose samples (upper consolidation curve) developed s t r a i n softening


response with s i g n i f i c a n t s t r a i n p o t e n t i a l (>2%).

The stress state at

steady state vs e^ f o r these samples may be seen to form a well defined


steady state l i n e with s l i g h t scatter at around e c = 0.70. No i n i t i a l
state gave r i s e to either s t r a i n hardening or s l i g h t l y s t r a i n softening
response.

I n i t i a l l y somewhat denser samples (middle consolidation curve)

under low i n i t i a l stresses al

developed s t r a i n hardening response, but

lc
s l i g h t s t r a i n softening response was obtained under higher al . For a'
lc
Jc
2
up to 25.0 kgf/cm (2450 kPa) and K =2.0 used i n this study, there was
c
no i n i t i a l stress state which led to s t r a i n softening with s i g n i f i c a n t
s t r a i n p o t e n t i a l and hence no data point on the steady state l i n e .
the sand was densified i n i t i a l l y

As

to i n i t i a l r e l a t i v e density of about

45%, a l l samples developed s t r a i n hardening response over the same range


of a\
and K values. It may be noted i n F i g . 4.13 that the plots of
Jc
c
void r a t i o versus a l at PT state f o r the two series of tests on i n i t i a l l y
denser samples formed two l i n e s more or less p a r a l l e l to the steady state

085

Sand

OHawa

0.80-

10

Kc

i
1.0
0.725 2.0
0700
0.675

0.75

20
0^

Steady State

30,

Line
Consolidation
Curves
lec -Olc ')

0.70-

40 ~
c
>
Q
50

0.65-

60*

Stale at phase tranformation


for dilative response

41

oloeo
o
>

NoteO Steady state


f Transition
State at phase transformation
for dilative response

70

80

0.5590

0.50

0.2
Effective

1.0

0.5
Confining

F i g . A.13

Stress

Relationship
various

2.0
OV

or

4.0

Effective

between e c

and

6.0

8.0 100

Consolidation

o^ a t PT

Stress

state

e^ under undrained compression

lc

40.0
20.0
(kal/cm )

f o r Ottawa sand

loading.

with

600

100

76.
l i n e obtained from i n i t i a l l y loose samples.

These l i n e s tend to approach

and may eventually merge into the steady state l i n e at extremely high
consolidation stress a' .
lc

This c h a r a c t e r i s t i c s of Ottawa sand i s s i m i l a r

to that of the t a i l i n g s sand.

From the results presented i n F i g .

4.13 i t

appears that the PT state for e^ = 0.70 w i l l merge into the steady l i n e
only when the consolidation stress
considered here.

i s greater than the range

Similarly for I n i t i a l l y loose samples, i t appears that

s t r a i n hardening response can occur under very low consolidation stress


7
only.

Therefore, the c r i t i c a l consolidation stress (o*' ) . _ could not


'
lc crit

be obtained for the range of consolidation stresses and i n i t i a l void


r a t i o considered. However, as discussed i n Section 4.1, sample with
i n i t i a l r e l a t i v e density greater than about 45% has l i t t l e p o s s i b i l i t y of
developing s t r a i n softening response.

On the other hand, samples with

i n i t i a l r e l a t i v e density looser than about 40%, are highly susceptible to


liquefaction.
Only limited test data were obtained for both sands i n undrained
extension loading.

Only those samples which led to the development of

steady state deformation were covered.


ings sand are shown i n F i g .

4.14a.

Results of these tests for t a i l -

For Ottawa sand, more comprehensive

studies have been made by Chung (1984), and some of h i s test results are
shown i n F i g .

4.14b.

From the limited data obtained, i t i s apparent that

the steady state l i n e i n extension i s not the same as that i n compression


for

each sand.

Furthermore, the extension steady state l i n e for either

sand i s not as well defined as the compression steady state l i n e .

It i s ,

however, clear that for the same e c the steady state strength In extension i s always less than that i n compression because of smaller

at

steady state In extension. Moreover, the range of void ratio over which

77.

1.00

20

0.95

(a) Tailings
\
\

40

/
\

0.S5

Steady State Line


in Compression
50

or

>

0.80

60

\
70

\
\
\

0.75

80

0.70r--

_t_ ....

90

I/O

(b) Ottawa

0.70

Sand

H20

Steady State Line


in C Compression
in

30

vp
o>

40

o
w
Q

50

0.65

in

Q:

60
>

CL)

or

H'o

0.75

0)

100

0.80

CD

05

u
Q

\
O

30

0.90

Sand

|
0)

0.60

70

80

ft

0)

0.55h

90
0.50

0.1

0.2

0.5

Effective
Fig.

4.14

1.0

Confining

2.0

Stress,

5.0

CT^

10.0

20.0

100
50.0

(kgf/cm )

Comparison of steady state condition under compression and


extension.

78.
l i q u e f a c t i o n can be induced i n extension i s much larger than that i n
compression for the same range of consolidation stresses considered.
This difference i n compression and extension behaviour i s believed to be
a consequence of the inherent anisotropy

i n pluviated sand samples.

However, these loading path differences may r e f l e c t c e r t a i n s i t u a t i o n s In


nature, such as the s o i l elements at the crest and. near the toe of a
p o t e n t i a l f a i l u r e surface.

If such a s i t u a t i o n occurs i n nature,

possible extension mode of loading should not be dismissed.

E f f e c t of P a r t i c l e

Angularity

It was pointed out i n Section 4.1 that Ottawa sand can not develop
s t r a i n softening response once i t i s densified to an i n i t i a l r e l a t i v e
density above 45% f o r the range of consolidation stresses considered.
However, t a i l i n g s sand could develop s t r a i n softening response even
though the f i n a l r e l a t i v e density was over 100%.

From the consolidation

c h a r a c t e r i s t i c s ( F i g . 3.8) I t may be noted that angular t a i l i n g s sand


shows much larger compressibility under high consolidation s t r e s s .

Dur-

ing shear deformation angular sand shows stronger d i l a t i v e tendency under


low consolidation stresses but stronger contractive tendency under higher
consolidation stresses.

This increased contractive tendency i n shear and

higher compressibility during consolidation to high consolidation stress


are believed to be due to the breakage of sharp edges of angular p a r t i c l e
(Vaid et a l . , 1983).

It was found that the fines content (material pass-

ing No. 100 sieve) of angular sand a f t e r shearing increases with increasing consolidation stresses.

F i g . 4.15 shows the comparative grain size

d i s t r i b u t i o n curves of a fresh untested sample and a sample a f t e r


undrained shearing.

An increase i n fines content from less than 1% to

about 6.5% may be observed when the confining pressure of 25.0 kgf/cm

Tailings
Sand
Test AQ - U - #6
05c ' =25.0
kgf/cm
K
-2.0

sm

Sand
Coirs*
E

r>

m *

C
H

Medium

Fin*

Coerse

I3
5i

t ^

100

80

60

A
40

\V

- A rer

i est

/ "

B ifOl

test

20

>
0

Diameter (mm)

F i g . A. 15

G r a i n s i z e d i s t r i b u t i o n of t a i l i n g s sand before

and a f t e r

test.

Medium

80.
(2450 kPa) and Kc ratio of 2.0 were used in undrained shear. From the
grain size distribution, i t appears there was no major particle crushing.
This may also be seen from the microphotographs of tailings sand samples
before and after shear testing (Fig. 4.16). Very large amount of fines
may be seen in the sample after testing, whereas there is hardly any
particle with this size in the fresh sample.

For Ottawa sand, on the

other hand, no indication of particle breakage could be observed for the


level of consolidation stresses considered.

Therefore, i t is conceivable

that strain softening response in sand of rounded particles is related to


i n i t i a l loose structure.

Although consolidation of I n i t i a l l y loose

sample to high stresses can result in high relative density, strain softening response can s t i l l develop due to the I n i t i a l loose structure,
which may be mostly preserved during consolidation.

This seems to be

true for other sands with rounded or subrounded particles, such as banding sand used in Castro's (Castro, 1969; Castro et a l . , 1982) studies.
In such sands, liquefaction can develop only i n states of low relative
density.

Thus, for sand with rounded particles, i n i t i a l relative density

provides a good single parameter defining its i n i t i a l state for a prediction of i t s anticipated undrained response as long as no particle
breakage occurs. However, i f the consolidation stresses are high enough
to cause particle breakage, i t is believed that the behaviour of rounded
sand would be similar to that of the angular sand, due to the added
potential compressibility due to particle breakage.
It may also be noted in Fig. 4.12 and 4.13 that the steady state
line for rounded Ottawa sand is much flatter than that of the angular
tailings sand. This feature is another characteristic manifestation of
the

differences in particle shapes.

Similar variations in slope of

81.

After Test
F i g . 4.16

(AC-U-#6)

Microphotograph of t a i l i n g s sand before and a f t e r t e s t .

82.
steady state l i n e with changing p a r t i c l e angularity have been reported by
Castro et a l . (1982).

One important significance associated with the

f l a t steady state l i n e i s the extreme s e n s i t i v i t y to the magnitude of


steady state strength with very small changes i n void r a t i o .

This aspect

of sand behaviour w i l l be discussed further i n l a t e r sections.


While the discussions presented above are v a l i d f o r hard, c l e a n ,
uniform, medium quartz sand, p a r t i c l e c h a r a c t e r i s t i c s which increases the
compressibility of sand, such as f r i a b l e p a r t i c l e or presence of f i n e s ,
w i l l increase the contractive tendency.

Sand with such p a r t i c l e

c h a r a c t e r i s t i c s w i l l have a steeper steady state l i n e which i s a d i r e c t


r e f l e c t i o n of i t s c o m p r e s s i b i l i t y .

4.2.2

Characteristics of Strain Softening and Strain Hardening Responses


It has been shown i n Section 4.2.1 that f o r any void r a t i o e c

there exists a c r i t i c a l consolidation stress (al ) . f o r t a i l i n g s sand.


lc c r i t
Sand consolidated to i n i t i a l states with void r a t i o e and consolidation
c
stress a I

equal to or greater than ( " ' c ) c r ^ t develops l i q u e f a c t i o n .

The

stress conditions at PT state then f i t the unique steady state l i n e when


the sample i s loaded monotonically.

Otherwise only s t r a i n hardening

response or s l i g h t s t r a i n softening response can be developed.

This

c r i t i c a l consolidation stress separates the i n i t i a l sample state into


regions which w i l l develop l i q u e f a c t i o n and other type of response.
T y p i c a l undrained monotonic loading responses f o r samples consolidated to
the same e

above and below the v(al ) . _ = constant l i n e are shown


lc crit

schematically i n F i g . 4.17.
For case A, i . e . , the i n i t i a l stress state (a^

or to the right of ( i c )

c r

=
t

= K x a^ ) l y i n g on
c

const, l i n e , the sand always develops type

2 response ( l i m i t e d liquefaction) or type 1 response (true liquefaction)


i n the extreme case.

Many cases which f i t this type of response have

been shown by t y p i c a l test r e s u l t s i n Section 4.1.

I n i t i a l stress state

33.

.0o

Contractive
TtVon

<T^ /c'W
( 7

r^ ,\o<*

Region
Consf.

1/2 (cr,'+ cr3';

4.17

Undrained monotonic l o a d i n g response under v a r i o u s


confining pressures.

84,
represented by Case B i s the l i m i t i n g case f o r this category.

The effec-

tive stress states at peak strength and PT state (same as steady state i n
t h i s case) for a l l samples which show t h i s type of response f o r t a i l i n g s
sand are shown i n F i g . 4.18. It may be seen that regardless of the void
r a t i o , confining pressure and consolidation stress r a t i o , the peak stress
states or the stress states at which s t r a i n softening i s i n i t i a t e d leading

to steady state deformation l i e e s s e n t i a l l y on a constant e f f e c t i v e

stress ratio l i n e .

This c h a r a c t e r i s t i c has also been reported by Vaid

and Chern (1983 ) based on r e s u l t s obtained f o r Ottawa sand under c y c l i c


loading condition.

This stress r a t i o w i l l be called the c r i t i c a l e f f e c -

t i v e stress r a t i o (CSR) i n this t h e s i s .

The mobilized f r i c t i o n angle <f>'

at CSR (= 2.54) i s about 25.1 for t a i l i n g s sand.

F i g . 4.18 also shows

the e f f e c t i v e stress conditions at PT states f o r t a i l i n g s sand with


i n i t i a l states which give r i s e to l i q u e f a c t i o n response.

It may be noted

that the PT states also l i e on a constant e f f e c t i v e stress r a t i o l i n e ,


regardless of the void r a t i o , confining stress and K c r a t i o of the
sand.

The mobilized cf)' angle i s about 3 6 . 5 f o r this t a i l i n g s sand.

This implies that the steady state l i n e i s a space curve l y i n g on the


phase transformation

plane.

If the i n i t i a l stress state l i e s to the l e f t of (al )


= const.
lc c r i t
(case C i n F i g . 4.17), the undrained response s t a r t s to move into a
t r a n s i t i o n region, which i s characterized by the development of s l i g h t
s t r a i n softening.

The e f f e c t i v e stress state at peak strength for such

I n i t i a l states was found to move c l o s e r and c l o s e r to the PT l i n e as the


degree of s t r a i n softening became less and l e s s .

Case D i s the l i m i t i n g

case f o r t h i s type of response which i s t y p i c a l of the type 4 stresss t r a i n curve.


for

The dotted l i n e j o i n i n g CSR state f o r Case B and PT state

case D ( F i g . 4.17) forms the locus of peak stress state i n t h i s

t r a n s i t i o n region at t h i s p a r t i c u l a r e c . The PT state f o r this type of


response was found to have the same e f f e c t i v e stress r a t i o as that f o r

Failure
Envelope

Tailings Sand
16.0 -

0 Initiation of Strain Softening Response


Sfeody State
A Phase Transformation State for
Strain H a r d e n i n g Response a n d
Slight Strain S o f t e n i n g R e s p o n s e

Line

12.0

8.0

= 38.2

^ - ^ ^ - C S R Line

4.0 -

4.0

'

8.0

12.0

16.0

l/2(oy+oV)
F i g . 4.18

20.0

24.0

28.0

i.
32.0

36.0

(kgf/cm )
2

Effective stress conditions at the i n i t i a t i o n of s t r a i n softening


response and start of d i l a t i o n of t a i l i n g s sand' under undrained
compression loading.

40

86.
i n i t i a l states which developed steady state deformation, regardless of
the void r a t i o , confining pressure and K c
shown i n F i g . 4.18

ratio.

The actual results

also include data points for test results character-

i s t i c of t r a n s i t i o n a l response.
When the i n i t i a l stress state l i e s further to the l e f t of (cr' ) .
lc crit
= const, line (case E i n F i g . 4.17), the sand develops s t r a i n hardening
response with no peak strength developed.

The PT state for this type of

response, which corresponds to the maximum pore pressure condition, was


also found to have the same e f f e c t i v e stress r a t i o at PT states for
states which developed l i q u e f a c t i o n or limited l i q u e f a c t i o n of the trans i t i o n region type.

The

test results shown i n F i g . 4.18

also

incorporate

results of samples which exhibited s t r a i n hardening response.


From the i l l u s t r a t i o n i n F i g . 4.17,
chosen e

the i n i t i a l stress state for the

to the l e f t of (a! ) . = const, l i n e may


lc crit

tute e s s e n t i a l l y a d i l a t i v e region.

be seen to consti-

Sand with i n i t i a l stress states i n

this region w i l l develop s t r a i n hardening or s l i g h t s t r a i n softening


only.

Region to the right of ( a ' ) . = const, l i n e including states on


lc c r i t

this l i n e may

be regarded as the contractive region.

A l l i n i t i a l sample

states in this region w i l l develop steady state deformation.

The shaded

area i n F i g . 4.17

shearing

deformation may

where actual s t r a i n softening occurs during

be c a l l e d the region of contractive deformation.

the stress state reaches the CSR,


developed (0.2 to 0.7%

Before

r e l a t i v e l y small deformation i s

for the sands tested) although considerable

pressure can be Induced and the sample i s e s s e n t i a l l y s t a b l e .


once the stress state reaches the CSR,

pore

However,

preferred slippage between a

majority of p a r t i c l e contacts s t a r t s to occur.

Due

to the initial''loose

arrangement of p a r t i c l e s or breakage at sharp edges of p a r t i c l e In

87.
angular sand under high confining pressure, the p a r t i c l e s tend to
rearrange themselves

into a more compact form.

High pore pressure then

develops as a result of constant volume condition imposed with accompanying large deformation.

This process continues u n t i l the e f f e c t i v e

confining stress becomes low enough to cause a tendency to expand i n


volume with further shearing deformation which occurs at the PT s t a t e .
A l l discussion presented above are based on test r e s u l t s with
i n i t i a l Kc

ratio less than CSR only.

It should be noted that the CSR

simply represents the s t a r t i n g of major rearrangement of p a r t i c l e s during


shear.

Samples consolidated to K c values > CSR, i . e . , to a state within

the shaded area ( F i g . 4.17) would be p o t e n t i a l l y unstable and s t r a i n


softening response could be induced by s l i g h t disturbance. This may
seen from the results of the test shown i n F i g .
sample was consolidated to a' of 8.0 kgf/cm
Jc
about 3.0 which was

greater than CSR.

4.19.

The

be

tailings

(784 kPa) and K

r a t i o of
c

A s l i g h t increase i n shear stress

caused severe reduction i n shear resistance and the sand deformed i n a


manner similar to the c h a r a c t e r i s t i c of true l i q u e f a c t i o n .

Thus, the

sand consolidated i n this shaded region of F i g . 4.17, although stable


under drained conditions, i s p o t e n t i a l l y unstable under undrained
conditions.

Such a region of contractive deformation exists f o r contrac-

t i v e sand only.

Luong (1980) designated the region below the CT l i n e

(same as PT l i n e ) as the contractive domain and the region beyond the CT


l i n e as the d i l a t i v e domain i n the sense that positive pore pressure w i l l
be induced i n contractive domain and d i l a t i o n (reduction i n pore pressure) w i l l start beyond the CT l i n e .

This i s consistent with the term

d i l a t i v e region used here, since the pore pressure reduction w i l l not


occur u n t i l the PT l i n e i s reached even i f the sand develops

strain

88.

Tailings

Sand
#33

Test AC-U-

<?3 ' - 8 . 0 k g f / c m
Kc - 3 . 0
e -0.996
D
-(7.2%
2

ec -0.328

r j

I/2(OI'+0 ')
3

DRZ ~62.4%

(kgf/cm )

F i g . 4.19 Undrained monotonic loading behaviour of t a i l i n g s sand


consolidated i n t o the region of c o n t r a c t i v e deformation.

89.
hardening response.

However, the terms contractive region and d i l a t i v e

region used herein refer to the type of response, i . e . , s t r a i n softening


or s t r a i n hardening expected i n those regions of i n i t i a l state of sand
p r i o r to undrained shear.
For Ottawa sand, test results s i m i l a r to F i g . 4.18

f o r t a i l i n g s sand

representing the stress states at peak strength and steady state for
those states that developed l i q u e f a c t i o n are shown i n F i g . 4.20.

Similar

to the behaviour of t a i l i n g s sand, two constant e f f e c t i v e stress r a t i o


l i n e s , one corresponding to CSR and the other PT were obtained, irrespect i v e of the void r a t i o , confining pressure and K c

r a t i o of the sample.

The stress state at PT state of sample that developed s t r a i n hardening or


s l i g h t s t r a i n softening are also shown i n F i g . 4.20.

As i n the case of

the t a i l i n g s sand, the PT state for s t r a i n hardening response may be seen


to be the same as that of the s t r a i n softening response, regardless of
the void r a t i o , confining pressure and K c

r a t i o of the sample.

The

mobilized cf)' angles for CSR and PT states f o r Ottawa sand are 2 3 . 5 and
29.5 respectively.
It i s i n t e r e s t i n g to note that the slopes of CSR l i n e s f o r these two
sands are nearly equal.

The mobilized

i n t e r p a r t i c l e f r i c t i o n angle ^

angles are very close to the

of the quartz sand, which varies from

2 2 . 8 to 27 according to Horn and Deere (1962).

It appears that

preferred s l i d i n g at a majority of contacts would occur when the effect i v e stress r a t i o reaches the value corresponding to cj>u and thus marks
the I n i t i a t i o n of s t r a i n softening response.
Similar to the behaviour i n compression, two d i s t i n c t e f f e c t i v e
stress r a t i o lines corresponding to CSR and PT were found to exist i n
extension mode f o r both sands, as i s c l e a r from the r e s u l t s shown i n

20.0

l/2(0,'

F i g . A.20

+ a ')
3

(kgi/cm )

E f f e c t i v e s t r e s s c o n d i t i o n s at the i n i t i a t i o n of s t r a i n s o f t e n i n g
response and s t a r t of d i l a t i o n of Ottawa sand under undrained
compression l o a d i n g .
o

9 -

Figs. A. 21 and 4.22.

For tailings sand, i t appears that CSR may depend

somewhat on the i n i t i a l relative density of the sample, with mobilized <j>'


angle varying from 18 to 2 3 from the limited data obtained.

Higher CSR

appears to be associated with higher i n i t i a l relative densities. For


Ottawa sand, the mobilized $ ' angle at CSR i s about 15 (Fig. 4.22). The
difference i n CSR i n compression and extension for each sand may be due
to inherent anisotropy i n pluviated sand. The implication of different
CSR in compression and extension on the cyclic loading behaviour will be
discussed In the next chapter.

On the other hand, the PT line in exten-

sion has the same slope as that i n compression for both sands (Figs.
4.21 and 4.22). Since PT state i s a stress state after relatively large
deformation, i t i s conceivable that inherent anisotropy may be erased as
a consequence and hence the PT line w i l l be the same i n both deformation
modes.

4.3

Undrained Strength Under Monotonic Loading

It has been shown i n the previous sections that a sand can develop
either liquefaction or strain hardening response under monotonic loading
depending on i t s state ( e c >

o ^ ) after consolidation.

For liquefac-

tion the major concern i s the strength loss and the associated excessive
deformation, whereas for strain hardening response concern usually
centres on limiting deformation to an acceptable level.

Therefore, i t

would be useful to have strength estimation for these two cases in order
to avoid strength loss and excessive deformation i n contractive sand and
excessive deformation in dilative sand.

92.

Tailings

Sand

1/2 (0','-ha ')


3

(kgf/cm )
2

0 Initiation of Strain Softening Response


a Steady State

F i g . 4.21

E f f e c t i v e stress conditions at the i n i t i a t i o n of s t r a i n


softening response and start of d i l a t i o n of t a i l i n g s
sand under undrained extension loading.

Ottawa Sand

F i g . 4.22

Effective stress conditions at the i n i t i a t i o n of


strain softening response and start of d i l a t i o n
of Ottawa sand under undrained extension loading.

OJ

94.
4.3.1

Peak Strength for States Which Developed Liquefaction

T a i l i n g s Sand
The minor e f f e c t i v e confining stress at CSR s t a t e , a' , i s plotted
r

against minor consolidation s t r e s s , 0 " ! ^ , f samples of t a i l i n g s sand


that developed l i q u e f a c t i o n leading to steady state deformation i n F i g .
4.23.

It may be noted that the test r e s u l t s of samples with the same

ratio l i e on a straight line passing


the void r a t i o of the sample.

through the o r i g i n , regardless of

This implies s i m i l a r i t y In e f f e c t i v e

stress path u n t i l the CSR i s reached for samples with the same K

ratio.

c
Thus, the e f f e c t i v e confining stress at CSR state i s a function of
i n i t i a l consolidation stress al and consolidation stress r a t i o K , and
3c
c
may be expressed as
cr'

Jp

f(K ) a'
c
Jc

(4.1)

Plotting the slope of a' vs a' In F i g . 4.23 against K r a t i o , the


-Jp
Jc
c
function f(K ) can be obtained. Such a plot i s shown i n F i g . 4.24, which
c
indicates that f(K ) may be approximated as a l i n e a r function of K as
c
c
follows:
f(K ) = 0.412 K - 0.044
c
c

(4.2)

It i s i n t e r e s t i n g to note that extension of the r e l a t i o n s h i p of K c vs

a' /al to al l a l = 1.0, I.e., the i n i t i a l consolidation stress condi3p


3c
3p 3c
tion for which no excess pore pressure w i l l be induced during undrained
shear at the instant of i n i t i a t i o n of s t r a i n softening corresponds to
K c r a t i o approximately equal to CSR f o r the sand ( F i g . 4.24).

This

implies that s t r a i n softening response i s imminent, i f a sample i s


consolidated at CSR state prior to undrained loading.

S l i g h t disturbance

35.

0 '
3c

Fig

4.23

(kgf/cm )
2

Relationship between e f f e c t i v e minor p r i n c i p a l stress at


CSR state and e f f e c t i v e minor consolidation stress for
t a i l i n g s sand.

F i g . 4.24

Relationship between the r a t i o of e f f e c t i v e minor p r i n c i p a l


stress at CSR state and e f f e c t i v e minor consolidation
stress vs K r a t i o for t a i l i n g s sand.
ON

97-

could then cause the sample to develop strain softening, leading to


steady state deformation. It should be emphasized that this is true for
contractive sand only.

This phenomenon w i l l be discussed further in the

next chapter In conjunction with spontaneous liquefaction.


It has been shown in previous sections that CSR for a given sand is
a constant stress ratio,
and

ratio.

regardless of the void ratio, confining stress

Therefore, the stress condition at CSR or peak strength

can be expressed as
ip

"

C 0

3p

<'>

where c is the CSR, which is a constant for the given sand (c = 2.54 for
tailings sand) .
Substituting Eqs. 4.1 and 4.2 into Eq. 4.3, the peak shear strength,
S

up

= 1/2 (a' - ol ) , may be obtained as follows:


lp
3p

up

= i (c-1) al
2
3p

(4.4a)

or
S

up

= \ (c-1) (0.412 K
i.

- 0.044) al
Jc

(4.4b)

Hence the peak shear strength may be obtained as a function of i n i t i a l


stress state, al and K . It was further noted that this function f(K )
3c
c
c
in Eq. 4.2 may be approximated by

f(K ) - 0.380 K
c
c

with error less than 3.0%.


F i g . 4.24.

(4.5)

This line (Eq. 4.5) is the dashed line in

Use of Eq. 4.5 instead of Eq. 4.2 in Eq. 4.4b yields

98.

up

j (c-1) 0.38 K a
Z
c JC

0.19 (c-1) al
lc

(4.4c)

Eq. 4.4c implies that the peak strength which occurs at CSR i s a function
of major consolidation stress a^

only.

In other words, the peak stress

condition at CSR state would be the same regardless of the K


r
samples
were consolidated to the same a'
lc

ratio, i f

c
but with d i f f e r e n t K

and a' .
3c

For a clearer i l l u s t r a t i o n of the above conclusions, results of


three sets of t a i l i n g s sand samples each set consolidated

to i d e n t i c a l

al
but samples within the set having d i f f e r e n t combinations of a' and
lc
*
3c
K

are shown i n F i g . 4.25. It may be noted that, as postulated, S


Is a
up

function of a\ only at a l l three levels of al considered.


lc
lc

Thus, the

undrained behaviour i s mainly a function of ^c which i s the product of


K

and al .
3c

This may also be noted from e a r l i e r discussion i n Section

4.2.

Samples s t a r t i n g with the same e. w i l l r e s u l t In the same e and


i
c
the same PT state i f the consolidation stresses al are the same. It has
lc

now been shown further here that the peak stress state w i l l also be the
same provided the samples r e s u l t i n s t r a i n softening response, leading to
steady state deformation.
Since f o r a given e^ the void r a t i o e c a f t e r consolidation i s a
function of al only, regardless of the K r a t i o , the peak shear strength
lc
c
in Eq. 4.4c can be expressed as a function of e instead of al . The
c
lc
calculated peak shear strengths for f i v e e^ as a function of
and
hence e are shown by the peak strength l i n e s i n F i g . 4.26. The actual
c
peak strength test data are shown by the data points i n the f i g u r e . I t
may be noted that the prediction of peak strength by using Eq. 4.4c i s

Tailings

Sand

e = 1.0
t

D - 16.4%
ri

CvJ

E 6.0

K =
c

cn

2.0

4.0

X
1

6" 2.0
CM

2.0

4.0

60

8.0

100

12

1/2 (0/4-03*) (Kgf/cm )

14.0

16.0

18.0

F i g . 4.25

Comparison of undrained monotonic loading response of t a i l i n g s sand under the


same major consolidation stress but with different K r a t i o s .
U3

F i g . 4.26

Undrained strengths of t a i l i n g s sand under monotonic compression


loading.

101 .
very good for i n i t i a l l y loose sample.

For i n i t i a l l y dense samples,

s t r a i n softening response leading to steady state deformation could


develop only under high consolidation s t r e s s .

Very l i t t l e test data were

obtained i n this range of high consolidation s t r e s s e s .

The paired data

points connected by v e r t i c a l lines represent the peak strength (upper


one) and steady state shear strength (lower one), which w i l l be discussed
in the next s e c t i o n .

The PT shear strength l i n e s for s t r a i n hardening

response lying below the steady state l i n e w i l l also be discussed l a t e r .

Ottawa Sand
For Ottawa sand, the relationship between al
and a' as a function
3p
3c
of K

r a t i o i s shown i n F i g . 4.27.

the t a i l i n g s sand may be observed.

Relationship similar to that for


Much less pore pressure i s induced

u n t i l CSR state for samples with high K

r a t i o i n comparison to low K

c
c
This i s i l l u s t r a t e d i n F i g . 4.28 i n the plot of a' fal
versus
3p 3c
value. It i s again interesting to note that by assuming a l i n e a r

ratio.
K

relationship between 3 p / 3 c

anc

* ^

r a t i o , the

r a t i o corresponding to

no pore pressure generation u n t i l CSR state was found to be approximately


equal to CSR.
ing

This also implies that the s t r a i n softening response lead-

to steady state deformation i s imminent when the sand i s consolidated

to a state close to CSR.

This i l l u s t r a t e s the s i m i l a r i t y i n undrained

behaviour of both sands i f l i q u e f a c t i o n i s developed. However, due to


very small range of e^ over which l i q u e f a c t i o n can be induced, no attempt
was made to relate peak strength to

(or e^) and hence no

comparison

made of predicted and observed S


as a function of e , similar to F i g .
up
c
4.26.
It may be pointed out that the peak strength w i l l be used l a t e r to

102.

24. Oh

03c'

F i g . 4.27

(kgf/cm )

Relationship between e f f e c t i v e minor p r i n c i p a l stress


at CSR state and e f f e c t i v e minor consolidation stress
for Ottawa sand.

0.2 .CSR

1.0

2.0

1.5

2.5

K,
o

F i g . 4.28

Relationship between the ratio of e f f e c t i v e minor p r i n c i p a l


stress at CSR state and effective minor consolidation stress
vs K ratio for Ottawa sand.

104.

construct the CSR plane In 3-D effective stress state diagram for a
comprehensive illustration of the undrained behaviour of saturated sand
only.

The effective stress condition at this state may offer an explana-

tion as to the influence of static shear or Kc ratio on the undrained


response. Peak strength should not be used as a design parameter for
sand which undergoes liquefaction since the sample Is not stable at this
state.

4.3.2

Steady State Strength


It has been shown i n the previous section that the PT state coincide

with the unique steady state line provided the sample develops liquefaction.

Moreover, the minor effective confining stress

at steady state

is a function of e c only, regardless of the I n i t i a l void ratio and


consolidation stress conditions.

Since the effective stress state at

steady state lies on the phase transformation line which i s a constant


stress ratio line through the origin, the steady state shear strength S u g
can be expressed as a function of e c only.

This predicted relationship

between e c and steady state shear strength based on the unique relationship between

and e c at steady state i s shown in Fig. 4.29 together

with actual test results.

The predicted values may be seen to be i n good

agreement with observed results.

Similar unique relationships between

steady state shear strength or steady state confining stress and void
ratio e^ have also been reported by Castro et a l (1982).
Relationship between e and S
for Ottawa: sand Is shown i n Fig.
c
us
4.30.

It may be noted that the range of void ratio i n which steady state

deformation can be developed for Ottawa sand i s very small for the range
of consolidation stresses considered.

The steady state shear strength

105.

1.00

Steady State Shear Strength,


F i g . 4.29

(kgf/cm )

Steady state shear strength of t a i l i n g s sand.

0.75

Ottawa

Sand

0.725h

30
0>
U

Q)

Q
0.70 h
40 >

cr

TJ
o
>

CD

0.675H

Q>

50

D
a>
cr

0.65

60

0.625
0
1

2.0

4.0
Steady

Fig.

4.30

Steady

state

6.0
State
shear

8.0
Shear

strength

10.0
Strength,

of Ottawa

sand.

/2.0
S

J4.0 16.0

/8.0

(kgf/cm )
2

u s

ON

107.
Increases rapidly with decreasing e c when the r e l a t i v e l y density i s i n
excess of about 40%.
The steady state shear strength of sand may be regarded as the
stable value of shear stress the sand can s u s t a i n .

Sand subjected to a

s t a t i c shear stress greater than I t s steady state shear strength, which


i s substantially less than i t s drained shear strength, i s p o t e n t i a l l y
unstable under undrained conditions.

Catastrophic f a i l u r e could be

induced i f any type of undrained loading brings the stress state of sand
to the CSR s t a t e .

Therefore, the steady state shear strength should be

used as the design parameter against l i q u e f a c t i o n .

4.3.3

Phase Transformation Strength f o r D i l a t i v e Response


For d i l a t i v e sand i t was shown that al at PT state versus e
3
c

form a

series of curves depending on the e^ of the sand, regardless of the


consolidation stress condition ( F i g . 4.12).

Due to a constant stress

r a t i o at PT s t a t e , the phase transformation shear strength can be determined as a function of e


c

and e..
i

The rpredicted results based on al and


.
3

e f f e c t i v e stress r a t i o at phase transformation are shown by a series of


l i n e s i n F i g . 4.26.

A l l these l i n e s l i e below the steady state l i n e .

The- data points correspond to actual test r e s u l t s .

I t may be noted that

for fixed e^ the phase transformation shear strength increases with


decreasing e c and approaches the steady state shear strength as the
sample becomes more contractive with increasing consolidation stresses.
The lines f o r phase transformation shear strength merge into the steady
state l i n e when the consolidation stress i s high enough to cause steady
state deformation.

It should be pointed out that these l i n e s include

test data i n the t r a n s i t i o n region of sand, which r e s u l t s i n s l i g h t


s t r a i n softening and associated very small s t r a i n p o t e n t i a l , and may be

108.
considered to be the same category as the s t r a i n hardening region for
design purposes.
From the e a r l i e r discussion of s t r a i n hardening behaviour of sand,
i t was noted that much f l a t t e r s t r e s s - s t r a i n curve develops after PT
state ( F i g s . 4.3a and 4.8a,b).

From the e f f e c t i v e stress path ( F i g . 4.4)

i t may also be noted that the phase transformation shear strength i s much
less than the corresponding drained shear strength.

Furthermore, the

phase transformation shear strength i s much less than the ultimate


undrained shear strength which can be mobilized only a f t e r very large
deformation.

Therefore, to design against large deformation for d i l a t i v e

sand, the phase transformation shear strength may be the more appropriate
strength parameter to be used i f undrained condition p r e v a i l s .

It should

be pointed out that the strength estimation given here i s good f o r sand
that are not very d i l a t i v e or are even s l i g h t l y contractive which would
have the most p r a c t i c a l concern during undrained loading where l i m i t i n g
deformation are s p e c i f i e d .

For highly d i l a t i v e sand, such as sand with

high r e l a t i v e density under low consolidation s t r e s s e s , the phase transformation shear strength i s very close to the drained shear strength.
The ultimate undrained shear strength w i l l be very high and the s t r a i n
involved i s very small.

Drained shear strength w i l l then be appropriate

for design purposes.


From F i g . 4.12, It may be noted that the series of l i n e s which
branch o f f the unique steady state l i n e are very similar i n shape.
Therefore, r e l a t i v e l y small number of tests have to be performed i n order
to establish the key aspects of undrained behaviour of sand; i . e . , steady
state l i n e , branch o f f l i n e s , consolidation c h a r a c t e r i s t i c s and c r i t i c a l
consolidation stress (o' )

line.

The undrained strength parameters,

109.
i.e.,

steady state shear strength and phase transformation shear strength

can readily be obtained from e - o l plot and the e f f e c t i v e stress ratio of


c
J
PT l i n e .

For sand with a given e^ and consolidation stress conditions,

the undrained response and i t s strength parameter can be determined.


For

sand with known e

and consolidation stress condition, the undrained

c
response, i . e . , l i q u e f a c t i o n or d i l a t i v e response, can be determined from
the (al ) , d i r e c t l y .
lc crit

If l i q u e f a c t i o n occurs, the steady state shear

strength can be determined from e c d i r e c t l y .

For d i l a t i v e response,

the e, can always be interpolated from the consolidation curves (e - a l )


i
c lc
as long as normal consolidation p r e v a i l s .
always be interpolated from F i g . 4.12

Knowing e^, a^ at PT state can

and hence the PT shear strength

estimated.

4.4

3-D E f f e c t i v e Stress State Diagram

Experimental evidence presented previously has indicated that sand


can develop either l i q u e f a c t i o n , s l i g h t s t r a i n softening or s t r a i n hardening response depending on i t s i n i t i a l state (e , al , K ) . Therefore,
c
Jc
c
i t would be of utmost importance to develop a method which would enable
separation of the i n i t i a l states into regions susceptible to l i q u e f a c t i o n
and s t r a i n hardening response, and explain the Influence of i n i t i a l

state

parameters on the occurrence of l i q u e f a c t i o n and s t r a i n hardening


response.
Since most of the studies on the undrained behaviour of sand have
been performed on sands with rounded p a r t i c l e s , i t i s generally believed
that the r e l a t i v e density i s the most important factor c o n t r o l l i n g the
undrained response.

Sand with low r e l a t i v e density may be considered to

no.
be susceptible to l i q u e f a c t i o n without any reference as to i t s consolidation stress conditions.

Based on the r e s u l t s of present study i t has

been shown i n Section 4.1 that this may be a s u f f i c i e n t guideline for


sand with rounded p a r t i c l e s but may be completely Inadequate for sand
with angular p a r t i c l e s .

Moreover, the use of r e l a t i v e density alone can

not explain the influence of confining pressure and s t a t i c shear on the


occurrence of l i q u e f a c t i o n .
Castro (1969, 1975) proposed the concept of steady state l i n e i n 2-D
^~2
c

space.

The concept of steady state deformation was used to explain

the phenomenon of l i q u e f a c t i o n . It was proposed that the i n i t i a l state


of the sample has to be well above and to the right of the steady state
l i n e i n order to have the p o s s i b i l i t y of l i q u e f a c t i o n occurring.

Atten-

tion was focussed only on the s o i l behaviour during steady s t a t e .

Speci-

f i c a l l y , no quantitative attempt was made to assess whether l i q u e f a c t i o n


could occur for a known i n i t i a l state (e , a' , K ) . Also no r a t i o n a l
c
3c
c
explanation as to the influence of s t a t i c shear on the occurrence of
l i q u e f a c t i o n was o f f e r e d .
A comprehensive understanding of the undrained behaviour of sand can
be obtained only by looking at the undrained behaviour over a whole
spectrum of responses from s t r a i n softening to s t r a i n hardening under
various consolidation stress conditions on d i f f e r e n t types of sand.
Moreover, not only the sample state during steady state deformation but
also at the i n i t i a t i o n of l i q u e f a c t i o n has to be examined i n order to
understand the influence of factors such as void r a t i o , confining stress
and s t a t i c shear, on the occurrence of l i q u e f a c t i o n . This requires a 3-D
e f f e c t i v e stress representation of the most important stages, i . e . ,
i n i t i a l state (e , o' , K ) and i n i t i a t i o n of l i q u e f a c t i o n and PT state

111.

during undrained response.

Although the type of undrained response can


-

be predicted by using the e ( o

r e l a t i o n s h i p and the i n i t i a l

sample state i n a 2-D p l o t , as described i n Section 4.2, i t can not


explain the r o l e of s t a t i c shear on the occurrence of l i q u e f a c t i o n . It
w i l l be shown further i n the next chapter that a 2-D plot Is i n s u f f i c i e n t
to predict the occurrence of l i q u e f a c t i o n under c y c l i c loading, even
though i t s u f f i c e s to predict the occurrence of l i q u e f a c t i o n under monotonic loading.

Therefore, i t requires a 3-D e f f e c t i v e stress

representa-

t i o n of state at CSR, steady state f o r s t r a i n softening response and


phase transformation state f o r s t r a i n hardening response.

This i s shown

schematically i n F i g . 4.31, and w i l l be c a l l e d 3-D e f f e c t i v e stress state


diagram.
The state of sand i s defined by a point i n 3-D space given by void
r a t i o a f t e r consolidation e , p' = 1/2 (o ' + a') and q = 1/2 (a* - a ' ) .
C
1
J
L
j
Other combination, such as e , a ', a I, may also be used. The I n i t i a l

sample state i s given by the consolidation curve which l i e s on constant


r a t i o plane.

For c l a r i t y of the diagram, the consolidation curves are

not shown i n the f i g u r e .

The main features of the 3-D diagram are the

existence of phase transformation

(PT) and c r i t i c a l e f f e c t i v e stress

r a t i o (CSR) planes which are shown i n the f i g u r e .

The PT plane l i e s

s l i g h t l y below the undrained e f f e c t i v e stress f a i l u r e plane which i s not


shown i n the diagram.
It was shown i n Section 4.2.2. that the steady state f o r liquefact i o n and PT state for s t r a i n hardening response occur at a unique value
of e f f e c t i v e stress r a t i o corresponding to PT l i n e ( F i g . 4.18), regardl e s s of the void r a t i o of the sample.

Hence, the unique steady state

l i n e f o r l i q u e f a c t i o n and PT state l i n e s f o r d i l a t i v e response shown i n

Hydrostatic

Fig. 4.31

Plane

(a) 3-D effective stress state diagram for tailings sand and
(b) a typical section at constant e .

113.

F i g . 4.12 are states on the PT plane. . Therefore, the unique steady state
l i n e i s a space curve on PT plane, which r i s e s up above the hydrostatic
plane as the void r a t i o decreases, as shown i n F i g . 4.3la.

The l i n e s

branching away from the steady state l i n e are a series of l i n e s corresponding to the l o c i of PT state f o r d i l a t i v e response f o r several e^.

small section of these curves near the eventual merger into the steady
s t a t e l i n e l i e s i n the t r a n s i t i o n region (darkened area) of s l i g h t s t r a i n
so ftening.
On the CSR plane, there e x i s t another s e r i e s of peak strength l i n e s
for various e^,, which are the l o c i of CSR states f o r those samples which
developed l i q u e f a c t i o n .
shown i n the 3-D diagram.

For c l a r i t y of the diagram, these l i n e s are not


From the peak strength l i n e s shown i n F i g .

4.26, which are the projection of peak strength l i n e s on CSR plane on


e^-q plane, these l i n e s terminate at a c e r t a i n s t a t e .

In other words,

CSR plane does not extend a l l the way to the o r i g i n as shown i n F i g .


4.18.

The state at which the of CSR plane ends are shown by the curve C

In F i g . 4.31a.

The construction of curve C w i l l be discussed i n the next

paragraph.
As discussed i n Section 4.2.1, f o r a given e
c r i t i c a l consolidation stress (a ' ) ,
lc c r i t
to a t

there e x i s t s a
c
(Fig- 4.12). A sand consolidated

equal to or greater than ( { c ) c r ^ t w i l l develop l i q u e f a c t i o n under

monotonic loading.

Otherwise, s t r a i n hardening or s l i g h t s t r a i n soften-

ing responses w i l l be developed.


with decreasing e^.

The ( { c ) c r ^ t

Any combination of

w a s

un

f d

t o

increase

and a ' ^ which r e s u l t s i n

K ol = a'
= ( a ' ) , i s the c r i t i c a l consolidation s t r e s s .
c 3c
lc
lc crit

This Is

shown by the constant ( a ! ) . paths AB i n 3-D diagram ( F i g . 4.31a) and


lc c r i t
i n p'-q plot at constant e c ( F i g . 4.31b). It was also shown i n Section

114.
4.3.1

that a l l samples with state on path AB w i l l r e s u l t i n the same

peak stress state at C and steady state at S.

The peak stress state C


path AB at which

also corresponds to the upper l i m i t of constant al


lc

l i q u e f a c t i o n i s imminent.

This i s also i l l u s t r a t e d by the stress paths

s t a r t i n g from i n i t i a l states A , B and C i n F i g . 4.31b.

Therefore, the

c r i t i c a l consolidation stress condition i n 3-D diagram i s a curved


surface generated by t r a n s l a t i n g the constant o|
the void r a t i o changes ( F i g . 4.31a).

(= ^ [ c ^

c r

^^

path as

The i n t e r s e c t i o n of t h i s curved

surface with the CSR plane forms a l i m i t i n g curve C which i s the lower
bound of the CSR plane.

Below curve C the CSR plane does not e x i s t .

Liquefaction w i l l be i n i t i a t e d when the sample moves into CSR plane i n


t h i s region from below, e.g., sample D, during monotonic loading.

The

shear stress corresponding to the lower bound of CSR plane (curve C i n


Fig.

4.31a) has a very important implication i n the occurrence of l i q u e -

f a c t i o n under c y c l i c loading condition and w i l l be discussed i n the next


chapter.
From the 3-D

e f f e c t i v e stress state diagram, a c l e a r picture of the

undrained monotonic loading behaviour can be obtained based on the


i n i t i a l state of the sand.

For samples with i n i t i a l states l y i n g on or

to the r i g h t of the ( ^ c ) c r t s u r f a c e , l i q u e f a c t i o n w i l l be developed.


Sample state w i l l reach the CSR plane f i r s t and then undergo s t r a i n s o f t ening leading to steady state deformation, f i n a l l y ending at steady state
S (samples A , B , C and D).

For i n i t i a l states l y i n g to the l e f t of

( o ^ c ) c r ^ t surface, s t r a i n hardening response or s l i g h t s t r a i n softening


response w i l l be developed.

The sample state w i l l reach the PT plane

d i r e c t l y (sample E ) or reach the peak strength i n the t r a n s i t i o n region


and then undergo s l i g h t s t r a i n softening (sample F) depending on how

115.
close Che i n i t i a l state i s to the (al
It may
4.3,

) . surface.
lc c r i t

be noted that the undrained behaviour obtained i n Section

i . e . , steady state l i n e , phase transformation

state l i n e s and pore

pressure generation c h a r a c t e r i s t i c s , which are used to develop the


e f f e c t i v e stress state diagram, are s i m i l a r for both sands.
s i m i l a r 3-D

3-D

Therefore,

e f f e c t i v e stress state diagram as that of the t a i l i n g s sand

should e x i s t for Ottawa sand a l s o .

However, due to a rather small range

of r e l a t i v e density over which l i q u e f a c t i o n can be induced for the range


of consolidation s t r e s s considered, no s i m i l a r 3-D
for Ottawa sand.

diagram was

developed

Nevertheless, the r o l e of void r a t i o , confining pres-

sure and K r a t i o on the undrained behaviour were found s i m i l a r for both


c
sands with only minor d i f f e r e n c e s .

These differences w i l l be

discussed

i n the next s e c t i o n .

4.5

Role of Void Ratio, Confining Pressure and S t a t i c Shear Stress on


Undrained Monotonic Loading Behaviour

4.5.1. Void Ratio or Relative Density


Most of the understanding of the undrained behaviour of sand has
come from tests on rounded sands.

It Is generally believed that r e l a t i v e

density i s the most important parameter d i c t a t i n g the undrained response


with no reference as to the associated consolidation s t r e s s conditions
and p a r t i c l e a n g u l a r i t y .
From the consolidation c h a r a c t e r i s t i c s discussed i n Chapter 3, i t
may

be seen that a sample with given void r a t i o e c ,can be achieved by

various combinations of e, and consolidation s t r e s s condition a' and K .


i
3c
c
The i n i t i a l state of the sample can l i e e i t h e r to the l e f t or to the

116.
right of the c r i t i c a l consolidation stress surface ( F i g . 4.31a).

The

response under these two conditions w i l l be completely d i f f e r e n t .

There-

fore, specifying void r a t i o or r e l a t i v e density alone without reference


to i t s consolidation stress condition w i l l not give any i n d i c a t i o n as to
the type of undrained response anticipated.
Generally, decreasing e

w i l l increase the c r i t i c a l consolidation


c
s t r e s s l e v e l required to cause l i q u e f a c t i o n . This may be seen from the
increasing c r i t i c a l consolidation stress ( a ! )
. as the void ratio
lc c r i t
decreases from the 3-D

e f f e c t i v e stress state diagram ( F i g . 4.31a).

seems to be true f o r Ottawa sand a l s o .

This

However, f o r the range of

consolidation s t r e s s considered, the i n i t i a l void r a t i o alone of Ottawa


sand gives a good prediction as to the type of undrained response, as
discussed i n the previous sections.

4.5.2. Confining Pressure


Undrained behaviour i s normally studied by t e s t i n g i s o t r o p i c a l l y or
a n i s o t r o p i c a l l y consolidated samples.
pressure a o n

The Influence of confining

undrained response i s assessed by coupling

such as i n Castro's 2-D,

-a
c

3 state diagram.

As shown i n the

with

o^ c ,

3-D

e f f e c t i v e stress state diagram, i t i s the complete sample s t a t e , i . e . ,


e , K and a I , which controls the undrained response.
c
c
JC
a !j

Specifying e

only i s not s u f f i c i e n t to predict the undrained response.

This

and

may

be explained c l e a r l y from the behaviour of sand along a constant a' path


Jc
GB i n F i g . 4.31b.
ratio.

Samples G and B have the same a^

but d i f f e r e n t Kc

As explained i n Section 4.4.1, Sample B w i l l r e s u l t i n l i q u e f a c -

t i o n , whereas G w i l l r e s u l t i n s t r a i n hardening response or s l i g h t s t r a i n


softening response.

117.
The general influence of increasing confining pressure on undrained
response with other two factors e c and

held constant i s Increasing

contractive tendency (e.g. Sample E to D i n F i g . 4.31b).

However, the

influences of a ^ c on the occurrence of l i q u e f a c t i o n i n the contractive


region and the s t r e s s increment required to reach PT state i n the d i l a t i v e region have to be considered

separately due to d i f f e r e n t response

developed i n these two regions.


In the contractive region, the shear stress increment required to
reach the CSR increases with increasing 0 - c but i s proportional to a l ^
due

to the s i m i l a r i t y of stress paths (with same K c ) .

However, the

potential to develop steady state deformation increases with Increasing


a' .

This may be seen from the response of Samples B and D i n F i g .

JC

4.31b.

Sample D w i l l develop much severe strength loss and larger defor-

mation u n t i l steady state strength i s mobilized than Sample B.

Static

shear stress on Sample D could be greater than i t s steady state shear


strength i f the confining stress i s high enough.
state i s p o t e n t i a l l y unstable.

Sample under such a

This i s e s p e c i a l l y serious f o r cases of

high Kc r a t i o .
In the d i l a t i v e region, the shear stress increment required to reach
the PT state also increases with increasing al , but the r a t i o of shear
3c
s t r e s s increment to a^

decreases with increasing a i ^ due to the

increased contractive tendency.

This w i l l be r e f l e c t e d by the decrease

i n resistance to c y c l i c mobility with increasing a^c i n c y c l i c loading,


which w i l l be discussed i n the next chapter.
For sand with rounded p a r t i c l e s a l s o , such as Ottawa sand, the
sample w i l l develop s t r a i n hardening response under very low confining
pressures.

As the confining stress increases, the sample develops s t r a i n

118.

softening response s i m i l a r to that f o r the angular sand.

However, as

stated i n the r o l e of void r a t i o , r e l a t i v e density i s the most important


factor c o n t r o l l i n g the undrained response of rounded Ottawa sand for the
range of consolidation s t r e s s considered h e r e i n .

4.5.3. S t a t i c Shear Stress or Consolidation Stress Ratio


The increase i n s t a t i c shear or K

a'
-3c

r a t i o while maintaining e and


c
c
constant could transform a sample from s t r a i n hardening response to

l i q u e f a c t i o n as discussed before.

The influence of K

r a t i o on the
c

undrained response f o r samples i n the contractive and d i l a t i v e regions


could be quite d i f f e r e n t due to d i f f e r e n t types of deformation developed.
This may be i l l u s t r a t e d by e f f e c t i v e stress paths f o r samples i n the'
contractive and d i l a t i v e regions shown i n F i g .

4.32.

In the contractive region (Sample C^ and


sample with higher K

having same-al ) , the

r a t i o develops higher peak shear strength.

This

c
may also be seen from Eq. 4.4b.

However, the shear stress increment

required to reach the peak strength s t a r t i n g from the i n i t i a l s t a t i c


value always decreases with increasing

ratio.

s u b s t i t u t i n g Eq. 4.4b i n t o the r e l a t i o n of AS

This may be shown by


= S

up

-T
up

where S
s

= peak
up

shear strength and T s = s t a t i c shear s t r e s s .

AS

up

= L[(1/2 (c-1)(0.412 K - 0.044) - 1/2


c

Equation 4.6 implies AS


l i m i t i n g case, i . e . , K

J
(K -1)]
al
c
ic

decreases with increasing


= CSR

ratio.

(4.6)

For the

(=c), the shear s t r e s s increment required

c
to reach the peak strength i s p r a c t i c a l l y zero.

i n other words, the

s t r a i n softening response i s imminent when the sample i s consolidated

120.
under t h i s e f f e c t i v e stress r a t i o .

This may also be seen; from the r e l a -

tionship between the pore pressure generated u n t i l l the CSR state and K
c
r a t i o as shown i n F i g . 4.24.

This case may correspond to: the phenomenon

of spontaneous l i q u e f a c t i o n , which w i l l be discussed further i n the next


chapter.

Due to the unique steady state strength at constant void r a t i o

e^, the p o t e n t i a l to develop steady state deformation Increases with


increasing K

r a t i o . . More severe loss of shear resistance accompanied by

l a r g e r deformation w i l l occur i n sand with high K

than with lower K


c

ratios.

Therefore, not only l i q u e f a c t i o n i s easier to occur but also the

strength loss on l i q u e f a c t i o n i s more severe when the s t a t i c shear stress


i s increased.
From the pore pressure generation c h a r a c t e r i s t i c s and unique steady
state l i n e observed, i t appears that the behaviour discussed above for
t a i l i n g s sand are also true f o r rounded Ottawa sand.
In the d i l a t i v e region (Samples D^ and D^) also the sand with higher
K

r a t i o develops higher shear strength at PT state and the shear stress

increment required to reach the PT state i s smaller.


that observed i n the contractive region.

This i s s i m i l a r to

However, t h i s s i m i l a r i t y i n

monotonic loading behaviour i n contractive and d i l a t i v e regions can not


be applied to c y c l i c loading behaviour, as w i l l be shown i n the next
chapter.
The same conclusion concerning the influence of s t a t i c shear to
reach the PT state In the d i l a t i v e region appears to be true f o r Ottawa
sand also due to the s i m i l a r i t y of undrained behaviour i n the d i l a t i v e
region i n both sands.
From the discussions presented above, i t may be seen that using
r e l a t i v e density or a 2-D e -o I representation i s i n s u f f i c i e n t for

121 .
predicting the undrained response.

Undrained response i s mainly

c o n t r o l l e d by major consolidation stress o ^ f o r

a given sand.

e f f e c t i v e stress state diagram developed t i e s the e f f e c t s of

The

3-D

and a l

on the undrained response and also provides a method to predict the


undrained response given the i n i t i a l state of the sand.

It also provides

a general understanding as to the r o l e s of void r a t i o , confining pressure


and s t a t i c shear s t r e s s on the undrained monotonic loading behaviour.

122.
CHAPTER 5
UNDRAINED CYCLIC LOADING BEHAVIOUR

It was discussed

i n Chapter 2 that s t r a i n development during

cyclic

loading could be either due to l i q u e f a c t i o n or c y c l i c mobility or a


combination of two. Although both l i q u e f a c t i o n and c y c l i c mobility
result i n large deformation which i s unacceptable for engineering
purposes, the mechanisms of s t r a i n development as a consequence of l i q u e faction and c y c l i c mobility are quite d i f f e r e n t .

Therefore, the e f f e c t

of factors on the s t r a i n development due to these two mechanisms could be


quite d i f f e r e n t too. In order to understand the influence of f a c t o r s ,
such as void r a t i o , confining pressure and s t a t i c shear stress l e v e l , on
the s t r a i n development under c y c l i c loading thus requires a clear understanding as to the mechanism which i s responsible f o r the s t r a i n development. Moreover, It would be desirable to be able to predict whether
liquefaction or c y c l i c mobility w i l l be induced under c y c l i c loading
given the I n i t i a l state of the sand and the amplitude of c y c l i c load
applied.
1

Although Vaid and Chern (1983 ' ) made clear d i s t i n c t i o n s between


l i q u e f a c t i o n and c y c l i c mobility as the mechanisms of s t r a i n development
during c y c l i c loading, the studies were limited to one sand and one
confining pressure only.

Therefore, no general guideline was offered to

predict the occurrence of l i q u e f a c t i o n or c y c l i c mobility under c y c l i c


loading given the i n i t i a l state of the sample and the c y c l i c

loads

applied.
This chapter describes tests on samples of both sands consolidated
to various i n i t i a l states to i l l u s t r a t e the mechanisms of l i q u e f a c t i o n

123.
and c y c l i c mobility for s t r a i n development under c y c l i c loading.

The 3-D

e f f e c t i v e stress state diagram developed under monotonic loading


tions i s then used, together with c y c l i c loading

condi-

results to develop a

comprehensive method for prediction of the occurrence of l i q u e f a c t i o n or


c y c l i c mobility given the i n i t i a l state of the sand and the c y c l i c loads
applied.

A r a t i o n a l explanation as to the influence of factors a f f e c t i n g

the resistance to s t r a i n development under c y c l i c loading i s presented i n


an attempt to c l a r i f y some of the controversial aspects of c y c l i c

loading

response reported i n l i t e r a t u r e .

5.1

Liquefaction Induced Under C y c l i c Loading

In order to demonstrate occurrence of l i q u e f a c t i o n during c y c l i c


loading, a series of tests were performed on i n i t i a l l y
both sands.

loose samples f o r

A l l sand states (e , a l , K ) a f t e r consolidation were so


c' 3c
c

chosen that liquefactions were expected under monotonic loading

condi-

tions.

i n order

Tests were performed under s t r a i n controlled conditions

to avoid the influence of loading system on the post-peak s t r e s s - s t r a i n


behaviour, as discussed i n Chapter 3.
For i s o t r o p i c a l l y consolidated
2 a l c required

sand, the c y c l i c stress r a t i o

<J
(

j C y/

to cause l i q u e f a c t i o n to occur Is very high and close to

the peak shear strength under monotonic loading.

Moreoever, under this

high c y c l i c stress r a t i o , l i q u e f a c t i o n occurs invariably i n the extension


mode, which i s not the main focus of study i n these i n v e s t i g a t i o n s .
Therefore, only samples consolidated
series of t e s t .

to high K c r a t i o were used i n this

The results obtained i n this series of tests were used

to e s t a b l i s h c r i t e r i a for l i q u e f a c t i o n to occur under c y c l i c


conditions.

loading

124.

Another series of c y c l i c loading tests were performed i n order to


confirm the l i q u e f a c t i o n c r i t e r i a established by the e a r l i e r test s e r i e s .
These test r e s u l t s are also used to I l l u s t r a t e the influence of various
factors on the resistance to s t r a i n development under c y c l i c loading
(Section 5.4).

5.1.1

Liquefaction During C y c l i c Loading


Typical results I l l u s t r a t i n g s t r e s s - s t r a i n r e l a t i o n s and pore

pressure response of t a i l i n g s sand under various levels of confining


pressure are shown In F i g . 5.1a,b,c, together with the e f f e c t i v e stress
paths.

It may be seen that during the f i r s t few cycles of loading, pore

pressure accumulated progressively and the e f f e c t i v e stress path moved


toward l e f t .
Its

However, the sample accumulated

very small s t r a i n before

state reached a c e r t a i n e f f e c t i v e stress r a t i o .

Further straining

beyond this e f f e c t i v e stress ratio caused the sample to lose i t s shear


resistance, which was accompanied by the development of large unidirect i o n a l deformation ( c h a r a c t e r i s t i c of liquefaction) and pore pressure
increase.

The sample deformed continuously over a s i g n i f i c a n t range of

a x i a l deformation i n the same manner as the steady state observed under


monotonic loading conditions.

This continuous deformation was arrested

in a l l samples after large straining except i n the case under high


confining pressure ( F i g .

5.1c) which developed unlimited s t r a i n (true

l i q u e f a c t i o n ) without causing d i l a t i o n .
showed a sudden turnaround.

The e f f e c t i v e stress path then

The sample kept on strengthening with

decreasing pore pressure while the e f f e c t i v e stress path moved toward the
undrained f a i l u r e envelope u n t i l the peak c y c l i c load applied was
reached.

125.

5.Oh

\/2
F i g . 5.1a

(a, '+(J ')


3

(kgf/cm )

Undrained c y c l i c loading behaviour of contractive t a i l i n g s


sand under low confining pressure.

126.

l/2(0i'+03 ')

F i g . 5.1b

(kgf/cm )
2

Undrained c y c l i c loading behaviour of contractive t a i l i n g s


sand under moderate confining pressure.

127.

32.0\-

F i g . 5.1c

(%)

Undrained c y c l i c loading behaviour of contractive


sand under high confining pressure.

tailings

Tailings

Sand

1/2

F i g . 5.1c

(Cont'd)

(oy + oy)

(kgf/cm )

Undrained c y c l i c l o a d i n g behaviour of c o n t r a c t i v e
sand under high c o n f i n i n g p r e s s u r e .

tailings

129.
For Ottawa sand, behaviour similar to that for t a i l i n g s sand was
observed.

Typical test results i l l u s t r a t i n g s t r e s s - s t r a i n curves and

pore pressure

response are shown i n F i g . 5.2a,b,c, along with the effec-

tive stress paths.

Unlike the behaviour of the t a i l i n g s sand, a l l

samples of Ottawa sand developed limited s t r a i n s before the continuous


deformations were arrested.
high confining pressure.

No unlimited s t r a i n was developed even under

Such behaviour of Ottawa sand i s similar to

that observed under monotonic loading conditions.


The e f f e c t i v e stress states at which s t r a i n softening response was
i n i t i a t e d during c y c l i c loading are shown i n F i g s . 5.3 and 5.4 for t a i l ings sand and Ottawa sand r e s p e c t i v e l y . I t may be seen that for both
sands a l l data points l i e e s s e n t i a l l y on the c r i t i c a l e f f e c t i v e stress
r a t i o (CSR) l i n e obtained under monotonic loading conditions.

This

unique CSR line under monotonic and c y c l i c loading was also observed by
2

Vaid and Chern (1983 ) f o r Ottawa sand under low confining pressures.

5.1.2

A p p l i c a b i l i t y of Steady State Concept to Liquefaction Under C y c l i c


Loading Conditions
Test r e s u l t s In the previous sections showed that the l i q u e f a c t i o n

occurs during c y c l i c loading i n the same manner as observed under monotonic loading conditions.

In order to consider the a p p l i c a b i l i t y of the

steady state concept and the 3-D e f f e c t i v e stress state diagram developed
under monotonic loading conditions to predict the occurrence of liquefaction under c y c l i c loading conditions, the uniqueness of steady state
under monotonic and c y c l i c loading conditions has to be examined.
The minor e f f e c t i v e confining stress
loading condition versus void ratio e

at steady state under c y c l i c

are shown by data points i n F i g s .

130.

2.5

2.0
0.43 kgf/cm

CM

(.5

CJ

>*D
-SC

LO
Ottawa Sand
Test AC - U

CO

as
o

Y?

cy

-#55

0*3^ = 2.0 kgf/cm


Kc =2.0
ej =0.722
Dri =30.6%
=
366%
er =0.703
're

0.5

2.0

4.0

a.o

6.0

/o.o

(2.0

14.0

CM

u
1.0

rj

0.5 h

C\J

1/2 (Cf,'-hCJ ') (kgf/cm')


3

F i g . 5.2a

Undrained c y c l i c loading behaviour of i n i t i a l l y loose Ottawa


sand under low confining pressure.

131 .

Ottawa Sand

2.0

4.0

6.0

8.0

10.0

&a (%)

1/2

F i g . 5.2b

(0*,*-rd ';
3

( k g f / c m

12.0

Undrained c y c l i c loading behaviour of i n i t i a l l y loose


Ottawa sand under moderate confining pressure.

F i g . 5.2c

Undrained c y c l i c loading behaviour of i n i t i a l l y loose


Ottawa sand under high confining pressure.

Ottawa

Sand

1/2

F i g . 5.2c (Cont'd)

(Oi'+03 ')

(kgf/cm )

Undrained c y c l i c loading behaviour of i n i t i a l l y loose Ottawa


sand under high confining pressure.

20.0

4.0

8.0

12.0

16.0

1/2 (Of'+O^)

F i g . 5.3

20.0

24.0

28.0

32.0

36.0

40.0

(kgf/cm )

Effective stress conditions at the i n i t i a t i o n of strain softening


response and start of d i l a t i o n of t a i l i n g s sand under undrained
c y c l i c loading.

O J

20.0
Ottawa Sand

1/2 (Of'+Oj)

F i g . 5.A

(kgf/cm )
2

E f f e c t i v e s t r e s s c o n d i t i o n s at the i n i t i a t i o n of s t r a i n s o f t e n i n g
response and s t a r t of d i l a t i o n of Ottawa sand under undrained
cyclic loading.

UO
Ul

136.
5.5 and 5.6 f o r t a i l i n g s sand and Ottawa sand r e s p e c t i v e l y .

The range of

a'^ covered under c y c l i c loading spans the f u l l range covered under monotonic loading.
ing

Average steady state l i n e s obtained under monotonic load-

conditions are shown by s o l i d l i n e s , and i t may be noted that the

c y c l i c loading results f i t very c l o s e l y the results from monotonic loading

over the entire range of void ratio considered

for both sands.

Furthermore, the c y c l i c loading test data i n F i g s . 5.3 and 5.4 show that
the effective stress states at steady state also l i e on the same PT line
obtained under monotonic loading.

Therefore, the steady state i s not

affected by the loading paths which bring the sand to this state, and the
steady state concept developed under monotonic loading conditions can be
used for c y c l i c loading conditions a l s o .
Due to the uniqueness of steady state l i n e and PT l i n e under monotonic and c y c l i c loading conditions, the steady state shear strength can
be obtained as a function of e a l s o .
c

The results f o r t a i l i n g s sand and

Ottawa sand are shown i n F i g s . 5.7 and 5.8 r e s p e c t i v e l y .

C y c l i c loading

and monotonic loading results may be seen to be defined by a unique curve


for

each sand. It may be pointed out that the existence of steady state for a sand

with a given i n i t i a l state does not necessarily imply that l i q u e f a c t i o n


w i l l develop under c y c l i c loading.

The c r i t e r i a whether a sand with a

given i n i t i a l state w i l l develop l i q u e f a c t i o n under c y c l i c loading i s


discussed i n the next s e c t i o n .

5.1.3

C r i t e r i a to Cause Liquefaction Under C y c l i c Loading


It has been shown that the c r i t i c a l

e f f e c t i v e stress r a t i o (CSR) at

which s t r a i n softening response i s i n i t i a t e d leading to l i q u e f a c t i o n

/.OOi

O.I

0.2

0.5

Steady

1.0

State

2.0

50

Confining Stress,

10.0

0'
3

20.0

50.0

1000

(kgf/cm )
2

oj

F i g . 5.5

Comparison of steady state confining stress of t a i l i n g s sand under


monotonic and c y c l i c loading conditions.

0
0.80-

-10

>
-80
0.55 -

o Cyclic loading

fesf

result

-90
i

sol

'

0.1

l
I
0.5
1.0
2.0
5.0
Steady State Confining Stress, 0 '
I

0.2

F i g . 5.6

100
20.0
(kgf/cm )

50.0

1100
100.0

Comparison of steady state confining stress of Ottawa sand under


monotonic and c y c l i c loading conditions.

CO

139.

Fig. 5.7

Comparison of steady state shear strength of tailings


sand under monotonic and cyclic loading conditions.

0.75
Ottawa Sand

0.725

30

0.70
Steady
State Shear
Strength
obtained
from
monotonic
loading
tests.

/
/

40

0.675
Rati

O
~0

"

50

Xi

06.5
o

06
.250 20
. 40
. 60
.
i

Cycl/c

test result

.J40
100
. 120
. 1
. 160
.60
i

8.0
Steady State Shear Strength, S

Fig. 5 . 8

loading

u s

(kgf/cm )

Comparison of steady state shear strength of Ottawa sand under


monotonic and c y c l i c loading conditions.

141.
under c y c l i c loading conditions i s the same as that under monotonic loading

conditions.

Moreoever, the steady state concept developed under

monotonic loading conditions can also be applied to l i q u e f a c t i o n under


c y c l i c loading conditions.

Therefore, the 3-D

diagram developed f o r monotonic loading may


for

l i q u e f a c t i o n to occur under c y c l i c
It was

e f f e c t i v e stress state

be used to develop c r i t e r i a

loading.

shown i n Chapter 4 that for a given void r a t i o e Q

there

exists a c r i t i c a l consolidation stress (al ) . above which the sand


lc crit
develops l i q u e f a c t i o n under monotonic loading, and below which only
s t r a i n hardening response or s l i g h t s t r a i n softening can be induced ( F i g .
4.12).

Due

to the demonstrated uniqueness of steady state under mono-

tonic and c y c l i c loading, therefore, the f i r s t c r i t e r i o n for l i q u e f a c t i o n


to occur under c y c l i c loading i s that the i n i t i a l state of the sand ( e c >
al , K ) must be above the c r i t i c a l consolidation stress N(al )
3c' c
lc crit
surface.

In other words, the sand must at an i n i t i a l state (e , al , K )


c' 3c' c

which has the p o t e n t i a l to develop steady state deformation.

Whether a

sand with such an. i n i t i a l state can develop l i q u e f a c t i o n or not then


depends further on the c y c l i c loadings applied, which constitutes another
c r i t e r i o n and i s discussed i n the next paragraph.
l i e below the (al ) . s u r f a c e
lc crit

(Fig.
&

For i n i t i a l state that

J
4.31), the steady
state can not
'

be

achieved and hence l i q u e f a c t i o n can not be induced.


As discussed i n the previous chapter, the CSR

plane exists only i n

the region above peak shear strength at c r i t i c a l consolidation stress


(ol )
(state C i n F i g . 5.9
lc crit

for the fixed void r a t i o e ) and


c

the

e f f e c t i v e stress path CS i s the lowest stress path over which s t r a i n


softening response i s developed leading to steady state deformation.
Hence the peak shear strengh at (al

(strength at C) i s the lowest

143.
l e v e l of shear s t r e s s to be applied i n order to develop l i q u e f a c t i o n .
Due

to the uniqueness of CSR and steady s t a t e , the c y c l i c loading applied

must therefore result i n peak stress state above state C.


CSR

Only then the

l i n e w i l l be reached i n order to have l i q u e f a c t i o n i n i t i a t e d .

Such a

s i t u a t i o n can be i l l u s t r a t e d by the e f f e c t i v e stress path plots of three


samples at constant void r a t i o e^ and a^

in Fig.

5.9.

For sand with no s t a t i c shear stress (Sample A1 ) , although the


p o t e n t i a l to develop steady state deformation e x i s t s ( f i r s t

criteria

s a t i s f i e d ) under monotonic loading, for the l e v e l of c y c l i c stress shown


i n the f i g u r e , the stress state of the sand with continued c y c l i c loading
w i l l reach the CSR

l i n e i n the region where CSR state does not exist

(dashed l i n e below C ) .
case.

Hence, l i q u e f a c t i o n can not be Induced i n t h i s

C y c l i c loading w i l l move sample state progressively toward the PT

l i n e and only c y c l i c mobility w i l l develop, which w i l l be discussed i n


Section 5.2.

Liquefaction f o r state A1

can be developed only by applying

c y c l i c load with shear stress amplitude equals to the peak shear strength
(S

j_) under monotonic loading.

Under t h i s c o n d i t i o n , l i q u e f a c t i o n w i l l

be induced i n the f i r s t compression loading, which i s i d e n t i c a l to


monotonic l o a d i n g .
Increasing the s t a t i c shear stress l e v e l while holding a^ c
to a value l e s s then the peak shear strength S

constant

^ (Sample A 2 ) , two

condi-

tions can occur, depending on the amplitude of c y c l i c loading a p p l i e d .


If the t o t a l shear stress i s less than S , , i . e . , x + T ' < S , , the
upl
s2
cy
upl
sample state with continued c y c l i c loading w i l l reach the CSR
region where CSR
developed.

i n the

state does not e x i s t , and hence l i q u e f a c t i o n can not

Under t h i s c o n d i t i o n , only c y c l i c mobility can be induced.

However, i f the amplitude of c y c l i c load i s large enough such that the

be

t o t a l shear stress i s greater than S , , i . e . , x + T


> S , , the
upl
s2
cy
upl
sample state with continued c y c l i c loading w i l l reach the CSR
region where CSR
at CSR

state does e x i s t .

i n the

Liquefaction w i l l then be i n i t i a t e d

l i n e , provided that the number of stress cycles i s large enough to

move the e f f e c t i v e stress state of sample to the CSR state by

the

progressive development of residual pore pressure.


For sand with I n i t i a l s t a t i c shear stress greater than the peak
shear strength S

^ at C (Sample Ag ) , the sand state w i l l always reach

the CSR i n the region where CSR state e x i s t s .

Hence l i q u e f a c t i o n w i l l

always be developed provided the number of stress cycles i s large enough


to move the e f f e c t i v e stress state of sample to the CSR
It should be noted that the peak shear strength S
f o r the chosen e c

state.

, at (a' )
upl
lc crit

Is s l i g h t l y greater than the steady state shear

strength (S

Therefore, for p r a c t i c a l purpose the steady state shear

strength may

be used as the minimum value of t o t a l shear stress instead

of the peak shear strength value at C.

Thus, the second c r i t e r i o n for

l i q u e f a c t i o n to occur i s that the maximum shear stress ( s t a t i c + c y c l i c )


must be greater than the steady state shear strength.

That these two

conditions must be simultaneously s a t i s f i e d f o r l i q u e f a c t i o n to occur


under c y c l i c loading w i l l be examined by actual tests In the l a t e r
sections.
It may

be pointed out that the two c r i t e r i a s p e c i f i e d above for

occurrence of l i q u e f a c t i o n under c y c l i c loading are the necessary conditions only.

Whether a c t u a l l i q u e f a c t i o n can be developed or not depends

on the number of s t r e s s cycles a p p l i e d .

If the number of stress cycles

i s not large enough to move the sample state to the CSR

s t a t e , no

l i q u e f a c t i o n can be induced, even though both c r i t e r i a s p e c i f i e d above

145.
are s a t i s f i e d .

However, the combination of c y c l i c loading and pore

pressure increase due to pore pressure r e d i s t r i b u t i o n i n the s o i l mass


following the termination of c y c l i c loading could move the sample state
to

the CSR state and I n i t i a t e l i q u e f a c t i o n .

This i s e s p e c i a l l y important

i f the i n i t i a l s t a t i c shear stress i s greater than the steady state shear


strength, since the pore pressure increase due to c y c l i c loading coupled
with the pore pressure increase due to post c y c l i c pore pressure redist r i b u t i o n could lead to the occurrence of l i q u e f a c t i o n .

Therefore, an

i n i t i a l condition with T " > S


should always be avoided i n order to
s
us
eliminate the p o s s i b i l i t y of l i q u e f a c t i o n under c y c l i c loading.
For Ottawa sand also the CSR i s unique, regardless of the loading
paths which brings the sample state to the CSR, and the steady state Is
unique after l i q u e f a c t i o n has been induced.

Therefore, the c r i t e r i a

specified above for angular t a i l i n g s sand can be applied to sand with


rounded p a r t i c l e s a l s o .

However, i n order to examine the existence or

non-existence of steady s t a t e , the i n i t i a l r e l a t i v e density alone may be


used for the range of consolidation stress considered h e r e i n , as
discussed i n Chapter 4.
It should be noted that the discussions presented above apply to
compression deformation mode only.
to extension mode a l s o .

However, similar concept should apply

I t w i l l be shown l a t e r by actual test results

that l i q u e f a c t i o n can be induced i n extension mode i f these two c r i t e r i a


specified above are s a t i s f i e d i n extension mode.

5.1.4

Test Results
A series of c y c l i c loading tests on samples consolidated to the same

e and o' but with various levels of K r a t i o were carried out to


c
3c
c

146.
examine the v a l i d i t y of the c r i t e r i a established f o r l i q u e f a c t i o n to
occur for both sands.

The i n i t i a l sample states were so chosen that the

sand would experience l i q u e f a c t i o n under monotonic loading.

These

results w i l l also be used l a t e r i n Section 5.4 to i l l u s t r a t e the


influence of e , o l and K on the resistance to s t r a i n development unde
c
3c
c

cyclic

loading.

T a i l i n g s Sand
For t a i2 l i n g s sand,, the minor e f f e c t i v e consolidation stress a^ c of
16.0 kgf/cm (1568 kPa) and r e l a t i v e density a f t e r consolidation D
of
rc
70% were used. Four series of tests with consolidation stress r a t i o K
c
of 1.0, 1.25, 1.5 and 2.0 were performed.

The i d e n t i c a l f i n a l void r a t i

under various consolidation stress conditions was achieved by


consolidating samples prepared with i n i t i a l void ratios e^, obtained by
interpolating between the consolidation curves ( F i g . 3.8). Extremely
consistent f i n a l densities were obtained with variations i n r e l a t i v e
density less than 1.6%.

This also served as a check of the consolida-

t i o n c h a r a c t e r i s t i c s of sand discussed

i n Chapter 3.

The results of c y c l i c stress r a t i o a . /2a' (= x /a' ) versus


dcy
3c
cy
3c
number of stress cycles to develop l i q u e f a c t i o n or c y c l i c mobility are
shown In F i g . 5.10.

If c y c l i c m o b i l i t y developed, the number of cycles

refer to those needed to accumulate 2.5% a x i a l s t r a i n .


develops, a x i a l s t r a i n i n excess of 2.5%

If liquefaction

develops u n t i l steady s t a t e .

It may be seen that not a l l samples developed l i q u e f a c t i o n , although


p o t e n t i a l to develop l i q u e f a c t i o n i n monotonic loading existed f o r a l l
i n i t i a l states.

A combination of i n i t i a l stress conditions and c y c l i c

loading amplitude dictated whether l i q u e f a c t i o n or c y c l i c mobility would

Tailings

Sand

0 " ' - 16.0 k g f / c m

3c

e
Drc
c

0.20-

- 0 8 0 0 t 0.006
'70.01 1.6%

o
o

1.0
1.25
1.5
2.0

0.15

Cvj

0.10

Note- X
indicates
no liquefaction
induced. 2.5% axial sfrafns

were used for cyclic mobility.

0.05-

Number
F i g . 5.10

10

of cycles,

20

50

100

Cyclic stress required to cause liquefaction or 2.5% a x i a l s t r a i n for contractive


t a i l i n g s sand consolidated to various
ratios.

148.
develop.
Fig.

Both l i q u e f a c t i o n and c y c l i c mobility r e s u l t s are presented i n

5.10 to f a c i l i t a t e discussion of the c r i t e r i a to cause l i q u e f a c t i o n

under c y c l i c loading.
For i s o t r o p i c a l l y consolidated states (K = 1.0) and a n i s o t r o p i c a l l y
c
consolidated states with
lity.

= 1.25, a l l samples developed c y c l i c mobi-

T y p i c a l s t r a i n developments and pore pressure responses during

c y c l i c loading f o r such i n i t i a l states are i l l u s t r a t e d i n F i g . 5.11.


Since the maximum shear stresses ( s t a t i c + c y c l i c ) were less than 2.4
kgf/cm

=1.0 and 1.25 respecc


t i v e l y , which are s u b s t a n t i a l l y less than the steady state shear strength
for

(235 kPa) and 4.7 kgf/cm

(461 kPa) for K

the e selected (about 5.6 kgf/cm


c

lower bound), l i q u e f a c t i o n could

not develop.
For a n i s o t r o p i c a l l y consolidated state with

= 1.5, however, both

l i q u e f a c t i o n and c y c l i c mobility could develop depending on the amplitude


of c y c l i c load applied ( F i g . 5.10).

For c y c l i c stress r a t i o greater than

0.13, l i q u e f a c t i o n developed, whereas f o r c y c l i c stress r a t i o less than


0.13

c y c l i c mobility developed.

These two cases are i l l u s t r a t e d by the

s t r e s s - s t r a i n curves and pore pressure responses i n F i g . 5.12a,b. In


Fig.

5.12a, the c y c l i c stress r a t i o r e s u l t s i n maximum shear stress of

6.10 kgf/cm

(598 kPa) which i s s l i g h t l y greater than the steady state

shear strength.

About 2.5% a x i a l s t r a i n was developed i n the 5th loading

cycle with accompanying pore pressure increase.

In F i g . 5.12b, however,

the maximum shear stress Is s l i g h t l y less than the steady state shear
strength.

Consequently no sudden development of s t r a i n associated with

steady state deformation occurred. The s t r a i n developed progressively


with number of stress cycles as a r e s u l t of c y c l i c m o b i l i t y .

This may

also be seen from the plot of s t r a i n development versus number of stress


cycles i n F i g . 5.13.

149-

4.0

3.0

2.0

Ext.
F i g . 5.11

1.0

a(%)

/.0

2.0

Comp.

Tyipcal undrained c y c l i c loading response for


contractive t a i l i n g s sand showing c y c l i c m o b i l i t y .

150.

Tailings
O&-I6-0
Kc

I6.0\-

Sand
kgf/cm

/.5

ec

'0.805

(a)

0dcy /203c '

5th cycle

Drc ' 68.4%


= 0.J53
6th cycle

13 th cycle

12.0]

Estimated Steady
State Strength

8.0

4.0

2.0

4.0

6.0

e (%)

8.0

10.0

(6.0

(o)

CT

dcy

/2Cr ' - 0 . / 0 9
3c

Estimated Steady State Strength

I2.0\

/
*d

8.0

4.0

66th cycle

36th cycle

2.0

4.0

6.0

8.0

10.0

e (%.
a

F i g . 5.12 T y p i c a l undrained c y c l i c loading response f o r contractive


t a i l i n g s sand showing (a) l i q u e f a c t i o n , and (b) c y c l i c
mobility.

151.

From the two test examples shown above, both i n i t i a l states satisfy
the first criterion. But, the occurrence of liquefaction depends in
addition on whether the maximum shear stress condition in relation to
steady state strength is satisfied.
For anisotropically consolidated state with

= 2.0, a l l samples

developed liquefaction (Fig. 5.10). In this test series, the static


2

shear stress equals 8.0 kgf/cm

(784 kPa), which i s substantially higher

than the steady state shear strength.

Thus, both criteria are satisfied,

and hence liquefaction occurs in a l l samples.

Typical strain development

with number of stress cycles for such samples is shown in Fig. 5.13.

Ottawa Sand
For Ottawa sand, minor effective consolidation stress a' of 2.0
3c
2

kgf/cm

(196 kPa) and relative density after consolidation D

were used.

of 35.5%

Three series of tests with Kc ratios of 1.0, 1.5 and 2.0

were carried out.

Similar method as used in preparing the tailings sand

sample was employed to achieve samples with identical f i n a l density.


Again, very consistent final relative density was obtained, with variation less than 1.0% from the desired target.

A l l i n i t i a l sample states

chosen would develop liquefaction under monotonic loading.


The results showing cyclic stress ratio a, /2o' versus the number
dcy
3c
of stress cycles to develop liquefaction are shown in Fig. 5.14.
results for

The

= 1.19 obtained from previous studies by Chern (1981) are

also shown in the figure.

In contrast to the behaviour of tailings sand,

a l l samples developed liquefaction, regardless of the K c ratio.


For isotropically consolidated state, although the cyclic shear
2

stress applied (0.18 kgf/cm ) to one sample was less than the steady

No. of cycles, N
F i g . 5.13

T y p i c a l S t r a i n development vs number of c y c l e s
c o n s o l i d a t e d to v a r i o u s K
ratios.
c

for contractive

t a i l i n g s sand

OHawa

Sand

O^. 2.0 kgf/cm


e - 0 706 0 0 0 3
D 3 5 . 5 % 11.0 %
efl - 2 . 5 % 8 5 . 0 %
2

r c

i.o
1.5
2.0

1.19
0.J5

u
CVJ

0.05

10

20

50

100

200

No. of cycles, N

F i g . 5.14

Cyclic stress required to cause liquefaction for i n i t i a l l y loose Ottawa sand


consolidated to various K r a t i o s .

154.
2

state shear strength In compression (about 0.35 kgf/cm ) at the chosen


e c , this c y c l i c shear stress was greater than the steady state shear
2

strength i n extension (less than 0.1 kgf/cm ).

Therefore, l i q u e f a c t i o n

occurred i n extension mode. This i s i l l u s t r a t e d by the e f f e c t i v e stress


paths i n F i g . 5.15. Typical s t r a i n development with the number of stress
cycles i s shown i n F i g . 5.16,
As the K r a t i o increased to 1.19
c

although the s t a t i c shear stress

was less than the steady state shear strength i n compression mode, the
maximum shear stress ( s t a t i c + c y c l i c ) was s l i g h t l y larger than the
steady state value.

Therefore, l l q u e f a t i o n occurred i n compression mode.

This Is shown by the dashed line i n F i g .

5.14. The corresponding s t r a i n

development with the number of stress cycles i s shown i n F i g . 5.16.


For states with K

ratios of 1.5 and 2.0, the s t a t i c shear stresses

were equal to or greater than the steady state shear strength i n compression.

Therefore, l i q u e f a c t i o n occurred on the compression side i n a l l

cases.
From the r e s u l t s for both sands presented above, I t may be concluded
that both c r i t e r i a must be met i n order to develop l i q u e f a c t i o n under
c y c l i c loading.

Liquefaction can not be induced i f the maximum shear

stress c r i t e r i o n i n r e l a t i o n to steady state shear strength Is not s a t i s fied even though the sample has the p o t e n t i a l to develop l i q u e f a c t i o n .
It w i l l be shown i n Section 5.2 that l i q u e f a c t i o n can never be induced i f
the f i r s t c r i t e r i o n i s not met, no matter what c y c l i c stress amplitude i s
applied.

It should also be emphasized that these two c r i t e r i a hold for

l i q u e f a c t i o n i n compression as well as extension mode. Extension mode


should be checked i f c y c l i c loading results i n s i g n i f i c a n t shear stress
reversal.

In case both c r i t e r i a are met i n compression as well as

Ottawa Sand

Fig. 5.15

Typical i l l u s t r a t i o n of liquefaction of i s o t r o p i c a l l y
consolidated Ottawa sand under c y c l i c loading.

No. of c y c l e s , N

F i g . 5.16

T y p i c a l s t r a i n development vs number of c y c l e s f o r i n i t i a l l y
c o n s o l i d a t e d to v a r i o u s K
ratios.

l o o s e Ottawa sand

157.
extension, l i q u e f a c t i o n w i l l always occur i n extension mode due to a much
lower CSR i n extension as shown by test results i n Section 4.2.2.

5.2

C y c l i c M o b i l i t y Induced Under C y c l i c Loading

It was shown i n the previous section that a sand develops c y c l i c


mobility i f the shear stress c r i t e r i o n i s not s a t i s f i e d , even though the
sand has the potential to develop l i q u e f a c t i o n .

In this section, i t w i l l

be shown that a sand can develop only c y c l i c mobility i f the steady state
can not be achieved for the given i n i t i a l s t a t e .
both sands consolidated

A series of tests on

to i n i t i a l sample states below the c r i t i c a l

consolidation stress (al ) . surface w i l l be used to i l l u s t r a t e t h i s


lc c r i t
mechanism of s t r a i n development during c y c l i c loading. These r e s u l t s
w i l l also be used to i l l u s t r a t e the influence of various factors (e ,
c
CT^c, K ) on the resistance to s t r a i n development under c y c l i c loading.

5.2.1

Strain Development Due to C y c l i c M o b i l i t y


2

It was shown by Vaid and Chern (1983 ) that dense Ottawa sand does
not suffer l i q u e f a c t i o n under c y c l i c loading.

In such sand very small

deformations are developed u n t i l the e f f e c t i v e stress state of sand


reaches the PT l i n e .

S i g n i f i c a n t amount of deformation i s developed

during the loading phase when the stress state crosses the PT l i n e .
Unloading thereafter causes large increase i n pore pressure, bringing the
sample close to the transient state of zero e f f e c t i v e s t r e s s , but with
very l i t t l e change i n deformation.

Repetition of this phenomenon of

stress state moving a l t e r n a t e l y i n t o the region beyond the PT l i n e s with


cycles of loading ultimately results i n a transient state of zero

158.
e f f e c t i v e s t r e s s , which i s responsible f o r further accumulation of
deformation.

For t a i l i n g s sand, t y p i c a l s t r e s s - s t r a i n and pore pressure

response and e f f e c t i v e stress paths f o r i s o t r o p i c a l l y and a n i s o t r o p i c a l l y


consolidated samples are shown i n F i g s . 5.17 and 5.18.
were consolidated to D

of 70% under

These two samples

of 2.0 kgf/cm

(196 kPa) , such


rc
Jc
that t h e i r i n i t i a l states l i e w e l l below the ( a ' )
surface. Therelc crit

f o r e , the steady state can not be achieved, according to the r e s u l t s


discussed i n Chapter 4.
I s o t r o p i c a l l y consolidated sample ( F i g .

5.17), accumulated very

small deformation u n t i l i t s e f f e c t i v e stress state reached the PT l i n e .


From the f i r s t cycle u n t i l 29th cycle of loading, the s t r a i n amplitude
increased from 0.1% to 0.6% although the residual pore pressure reached
80% of the i n i t i a l consolidation pressure. However, the a p p l i c a t i o n of
30th cycle of loading produced a disproportionate e f f e c t .
amplitude during t h i s stress cycle increased to about 1.0%.
amplitude increased further from 1.0%
stress c y c l e s .
(Fig.

The s t r a i n
The s t r a i n

to about 10% i n the next eleven

From the pore pressure response during the 30th cycle

5.17b), i t may be noted that sample showed a decrease i n pore

pressure when the maximum shear stress was reached (points 3 and 4 ) .
This feature Is d i f f e r e n t from those observed i n the previous loading
cycles (e.g.

points 1 and 2 ) .

The e f f e c t i v e stress state at which the

sample starts to d i l a t e (decrease i n pore pressure) was found to be


e s s e n t i a l l y the same as the PT l i n e obtained under monotonic loading.
Thus, the attainment of PT state also s i g n i f i e s the onset of s i g n i f i c a n t
deformation of d i l a t i v e sample during c y c l i c loading.

It should be noted

that the stress state at PT l i n e moved closer and closer to the o r i g i n


(Fig.

5.17c) as the c y c l i c loading continued.

This concept of stress

E
o
u

To/lings Sand
Test IC-U - #27

cy

0 '"2.0 kgf/cm
K
-1.0
"0.814 D "66.1%
"0.799 D "70.2%
2

3c
c

rl

rc

.17a

Typical undrained c y c l i c loading behaviour of i s o t r o p i c a l l y consolidated


t a i l i n g s sand.

dilative

Tailings

Sand

Test I C - I U -

Fig.' 5.17b

T y p i c a l undrained c y c l i c
t a i l i n g s sand.

#27

l o a d i n g behaviour of i s o t r o p i c a l l y

consolidated

dilative
P

Tailings Sand
Test

I C-IW-#27

F i g . 5.17c

Typical undrained c y c l i c loading behaviour of


consolidated d i l a t i v e t a i l i n g s sand.

isotropically

162.

Tailings

_i
1.0

F i g . 5.18a,b

Sand

2.0

3.0

4.0

5.0

6.0

7.0

8.0

Typical undrained c y c l i c loading behaviour of anisot r o p i c a l l y consolidated d i l a t i v e t a i l i n g s sand.

Tailings Sand

Fig. 5.18c

T y p i c a l undrained c y c l i c l o a d i n g behaviour of a n i s o t r o p i c a l l y
c o n s o l i d a t e d d i l a t i v e t a i l i n g s sand.

164.
path moving beyond the PT l i n e i n order to develop large deformation can
s t i l l be applied when the transient state of zero e f f e c t i v e stress i s
reached.

Reloading i n both the compression and extension regions caused

d i l a t i o n (points 5 to 6 and 7 to 8) with accompanying large deformation,


p a r t i c u l a r l y a f t e r attainment of transient states of zero e f f e c t i v e
stress.

Unloading resulted i n large increase i n pore pressure (points 6

to 7 and 8 to 9) but with very l i t t l e change i n a x i a l deformation.


For

a n i s o t r o p i c a l l y consolidated sample ( F i g . 5.18), the c y c l i c

stress amplitude was selected so as to cause a s l i g h t amount of shear


stress r e v e r s a l .

S i g n i f i c a n t amount of a x i a l deformation was observed

during the f i r s t cycle of loading.


associated with l i q u e f a c t i o n .

However, this deformation i s not

The sample In fact d i l a t e d and showed a

turnaround i n e f f e c t i v e stress path ( F i g .

5.18c), a behaviour similar to

that observed for d i l a t i v e sand under monotonic loading.

The e f f e c t i v e

stress r a t i o at the s t a r t of d i l a t i o n (decrease i n pore pressure) was


found to be approximately the same as that of the PT l i n e obtained
before.

Unloading of shear stress during the stress cycle caused

increase i n pore pressure with very l i t t l e change i n a x i a l deformation


(point 1 to 2). Reloading the sample beyond the PT l i n e again caused
s i g n i f i c a n t amount of deformation and decrease i n pore pressure.

This

behaviour Is s i m i l a r to that observed f o r i s o t r o p i c a l l y consolidated


sample once Its stress state reached the PT l i n e .

However, due to only

s l i g h t amount of shear stress reversal involved, the transient state of


zero e f f e c t i v e stress was never r e a l i z e d .

Consequently, instead of

deformations increasing with number of stress c y c l e s , the accumulated


deformations leveled o f f as the e f f e c t i v e stress path got v i r t u a l l y
s t a b i l i z e d with increasing c y c l e s .

165,
After 55 cycles of loading, the c y c l i c stress amplitude was
Increased s l i g h t l y so as to cause 0.1 kgf/cm
reversal.

(9.8 kPa) of shear stress

The r e s u l t s of such loading cycles are shown by the data

points i n f u l l dots i n F i g . 5.18.

In f i v e additional stress c y c l e s , the

a x i a l s t r a i n amplitude increased from 0.4% to 5.2% ( F i g .

5.18a) and

accumulated a x i a l s t r a i n increased from 5% to more than 7%.

Unloading of

shear stress during the stress cycle caused the sample to reach the
transient state of zero e f f e c t i v e stress with very l i t t l e change i n
deformation (points 5 to 6 and 7 to 8 ) .

On the other hand, loading

caused the sample to develop large deformation with accompanying drop i n


pore pressure (points 6 to 7 and 8 to 9 ) .

This behaviour i s s i m i l a r to

that observed f o r the i s o t r o p i c a l l y consolidated case.


From the r e s u l t s presented above, i t may be concluded that f o r d i l a tive sand the deformation during c y c l i c loading i s due to c y c l i c m o b i l i t y
instead of l i q u e f a c t i o n associated with steady state deformation.

Signi-

ficant amount of s t r a i n can be developed only when the stress state


reaches the PT l i n e .

Repetition of stress state moving into the region

beyond the PT l i n e i s responsible f o r further accumulation of deformation.

However, the rate of s t r a i n accumulation with number of stress

cycles Is generally slow i f no shear stress reversal i s involved.

This

has a very important implication on the e f f e c t of s t a t i c shear stress on


the resistance to s t r a i n development under c y c l i c loading, and w i l l be
discussed i n Section 5.4.
The phenomenon of c y c l i c m o b i l i t y was often a t t r i b u t e d to the
r e d i s t r i b u t i o n of water content within the test specimen during c y c l i c
loading, e s p e c i a l l y i n the case with shear stress r e v e r s a l (Casagrande,
1975;

Castro, 1969 and 1975; Castro and Poulos, 1977).

I t has been

166.
argued that near the top of the specimen, the void r a t i o of sand
increases, and near the bottom i t decreases.

Appearance of necking

and

bulging of samples under the top loading cap during c y c l i c loading has
been advanced In support of this view.
deformations

The pore pressure buildup and

measured i n the laboratory were suggested to be due

to the formation of such loose zone within the specimen.

chiefly

Hence the

change i n e f f e c t i v e confining stress i n state diagram during c y c l i c loading, such as shown i n F i g . 5.19

for d i l a t i v e sample, i s considered

ficti-

tious i n the sense that i t represents average c o n d i t i o n s . Therefore, the


state point may

not reach the condition of zero e f f e c t i v e confining

stress i f the specimen were to remain uniform.


However, from the results shown above there i s good direct and
i n d i r e c t evidence showing that this progressive softening may not be due
to nonuniform deformation developed within the specimen.

It has been

shown i n previous sections that progressive increase i n pore pressure


during c y c l i c loading causes very small s t r a i n u n t i l the stress, state
reaches the PT state ( F i g . 5.17).

Under this s t r a i n l e v e l , there i s no

evidence that r e d i s t r i b u t i o n of water content can take place within the


specimen.

Moreover, the progressive Increase i n pore pressure and

deformations

can also be induced i f c y c l i c loading does not result i n

shear stress r e v e r s a l , i n which case the condition of transient zero


e f f e c t i v e stress ( F i g . 5.18)

never occurs - the condition which has been

considered responsible for development of nonuniformities.

Under this

stress condition, d e n s i f i c a t i o n i n bottom part of the specimen and


loosening l n top part as suggested can not occur.

It appears that

necking can occur only l n sample with nonuniform sample density or a f t e r


very large s t r a i n has developed.

By using the conventional procedures of

Effective

Fig.'5.19

Confining

Stress,

0*3'

Schematic i l l u s t r a t i o n of monotonic and c y c l i c


loading response of saturated sand in 2-D state
diagram.

168.
sedimentation and moist compaction, there i s a tendency for reconstituted
samples to achieve higher density i n the bottom portion and lower density
i n the top. Consequently, i n such specimens, nonuniform deformation
tends to occur and r e l i a b l e results may not be obtained.

Therefore, i t

i s very important to emphasize the sample formation techniques so as to


y i e l d sample with uniform density throughout. By using the improved
sample preparation techniques described In Chapter 3, the sample did not
develop necking even when the transient state of zero e f f e c t i v e stress
was reached.
It has been further i n f e r r e d that d i l a t i v e sand, which develops
negative pore pressure after reaching PT state under monotonic loading
( F i g . 5.19), can not develop progressive softening under c y c l i c loading
s i m i l a r to that of the contractive sample, i f the specimen were to remain
uniform (Castro and Poulos, 1977; Casagrande, 1975).

As discussed i n

Chapter 4 and this chapter, d i l a t i o n can occur only after the stress
state reaches the PT l i n e .

Therefore, the development of negative pore

pressure under monotonic loading i s a behaviour after large deformation.


However, c y c l i c loading behaviour i s a small s t r a i n phenomenon u n t i l the
stress state reaches the PT l i n e .

Therefore, d i l a t i v e response a f t e r

large deformations under monotonic loading ( F i g .

5.19) does not imply

that the same behaviour w i l l occur under c y c l i c loading.

It i s well

known that dense sample, which develops volume expansion under monotonic
loading, causes volume reduction under c y c l i c loading.

It has also been

shown by Luong (1980) that c y c l i n g a sample under PT l i n e causes volume


reduction under drained conditions.

Volume expansion can occur only when

the sample i s cycled i n the region beyond PT l i n e .

Under undrained

condition, this volume reduction r e s u l t s i n rebound i n s o i l structure to

the extent required to keep the volume constant.


by the schematic diagram i n F i g . 5.19
(1975).

This may

be i l l u s t r a t e d

proposed by Seed, Pyke and

Martin

This i n t e r p l a y of volume reduction and s o i l structure rebound

results i n build up of pore pressure as the c y c l i c stress a p p l i c a t i o n


continues.

Therefore, c y c l i c mobility i s another c l a s s of problem under

c y c l i c loading, and can occur i n sand during earthquake loading.

5.2.2. C r i t e r i a to Cause C y c l i c M o b i l i t y Under C y c l i c Loading


It has been shown i n Section 5.1.3

that sand with the p o t e n t i a l to

develop l i q u e f a c t i o n , i . e . , the steady state e x i s t s , w i l l develop c y c l i c


mobility i f the maximum shear stress ( s t a t i c + c y c l i c ) i s less than the
steady state shear strength.

It was

further shown i n Section 5.2.1

that

sand with i n i t i a l state l y i n g below the c r i t i c a l consolidation stress


a

( j _ c ) c r j t surface, i . e . , steady state can not be achieved, develops


c y c l i c mobility only, regardless of the amplitude of c y c l i c load applied.
Therefore, i t may

be concluded that sand with any condition that does not

s a t i s f y the c r i t e r i a to cause l i q u e f a c t i o n w i l l develop only c y c l i c


mobility.

However, the c r i t e r i a for l i q u e f a c t i o n should be examined both

i n compression and extension regions i f shear stress reversal i s


involved.
The above c r i t e r i a for c y c l i c mobility to occur i s v e r i f i e d by
performing a series of tests on both sands consolidated below the

(al )

surface.

These tests are discussed i n the following s e c t i o n .

5.2.3. Test Results


A series of c y c l i c loading t e s t s on samples consolidated to the same

170.
e and al but with various l e v e l s of K r a t i o were performed to examine
c
3c
c
the c r i t e r i a for c y c l i c mobility to occur.

The i n i t i a l sample states

were so chosen that the steady state can not be achieved i n compression
for

both sands.

For Ottawa sand, however, the steady state exists i n

extension mode at the chosen void r a t i o .

These tests also serve to

i l l u s t r a t e the importance of the mode of loading on undrained behaviour.


Results

from these test results w i l l also be used l a t e r i n section 5.4 to

i l l u s t r a t e the influence of e , al and K on the resistance to s t r a i n


c
3c
c

development under c y c l i c

loading.

T a i l i n g s Sand
For t a i l i n g s sand, the minor e f f e c t i v e consolidation stress ai of
3c
2
2.0 kgf/cm (196 kPa) and r e l a t i v e density after consolidation D
of 70%
rc
were used.

Three series of test with K c r a t i o of 1.0, 1.5 and 2.0 were

performed. Under these conditions, a l l I n i t i a l sample states l i e well to


the l e f t of the steady state l i n e s (compression and extension).

Hence

the steady state can not be achieved i n a l l cases.


The r e s u l t s of c yJ c l i c stress r a t i o a, /2al versus number of stress
dcy 3c
cycles to develop 2.5% a x i a l s t r a i n f o r various K c r a t i o s are shown In
Fig.

5.20. A l l samples developed c y c l i c m o b i l i t y , regardless of the

i n i t i a l state of., the sample and the amplitude of c y c l i c loads applied.


Typical results of s t r a i n development versus number of stress cycles are
also i l l u s t r a t e d i n F i g . 5.21.
I s o t r o p i c a l l y consolidated

sample developed very small deformations

u n t i l the stress state reached the PT l i n e .

The deformation

increased

r a p i d l y thereafter due to development of transient state of zero effect i v e stress (see F i g . 5.21).

Fig..5.20

Cyclic stress required to cause 2.5% a x i a l strain for d i l a t i v e t a i l i n g s sand


consolidated to various K r a t i o s .

5.0

Tailings
0* '2.0
3c

"0.801

*c
1.0
1.5
2.0

c
o

kgf/cm

ec

4.0

3.0

Sand
2

Drc -69.5%

0.193
0.344
0509

c/) 2.0
o
X

/.0

15

20

No. of cycles, N
F i g . 5.21

Typical strain development vs number of cycles for d i l a t i v e t a i l i n g s sand consolidated


to various K r a t i o s ,
c

173.
For

a n i s o t r p i c a l l y consolidated samples with K c = 1.5, the s t r a i n

development i s s i m i l a r to that for the i s o t r o p i c a l l y consolidated case,


except that the i n i t i a l s t r a i n accumulation u n t i l the stress state
reached the PT l i n e i s larger ( F i g .

5.21).

This may be due to the

presence of i n i t i a l s t a t i c shear bias and much larger c y c l i c load


applied.

A small amount of s t r a i n was induced whenever the t o t a l shear

stress approached

i t s maximum value causing a small s t r a i n accumulation

a f t e r each cycle of loading.


For

sample with K

= 2.0, the s t r a i n accumulation i s quite d i f f e r e n t

from the other two cases.

Relatively large s t r a i n was developed during

the f i r s t cycle of loading.

This was due to the fact that the i n i t i a l

e f f e c t i v e stress r a t i o was high.

During the loading phase of the f i r s t

stress c y c l e , the stress state reached the PT l i n e and thus a rapid


accumulation of s t r a i n was observed from the beginning of the t e s t .
However, the rate of s t r a i n accumulation decreased gradually because
states of transient zero e f f e c t i v e s t r e s s , necessary f o r rapid s t r a i n
accumulation, did not occur due to no shear stress r e v e r a l .

The sample

accumulated 2.5% a x i a l s t r a i n i n 10 stress c y c l e s , and i t took another 45


cycles to accumulate additional 2.5%
For

axial s t r a i n .

sample with the same e c but under higher confining pressure,

i t was shown i n Section 5.1.4

that only c y c l i c mobility i s developed when

the maximum shear stress i s less than the steady state shear strength.
For

such I n i t i a l states the relationships between c y c l i c stress ratio

versus number of stress cycles to develop 2.5% a x i a l s t r a i n for


and 1.25

were shown In F i g . 5.10.

low confining pressure ( F i g .


increasing K

= 1.0

Trends similar to those observed under


a

5.20), i . e . , increasing < j C y ^ 3 c with

r a t i o , may be observed even under higher levels of

174.
confining pressure.

Ottawa Sand
For Ottawa sand, minor e f f e c t i v e consolidation stress ai of 2.0
3c
2
kgf/cm (196 kPa) and r e l a t i v e density a f t e r consolidation D
of 51.5%
rc
were used.

Three series of test with Kc r a t i o of 1.0, 1.5 and 2.0 were

performed.

Under these conditions, the i n i t i a l sample states l i e below

the steady state l i n e i n compression.

Therefore, the steady state can

not be reached i n compression mode f o r these samples.

However, i t w i l l

be shown l a t e r that steady state i n extension can be reached f o r these


samples.
It was found that a l l samples developed c y c l i c mobility except the
one with K c = 1.0 which developed l i q u e f a c t i o n i n extension mode. The
results of c y c l i c stress r a t i o a^C y^ 2
a

ersus number of stress cycles

to develope 2.5% a x i a l t r a i n due to c y c l i c mobility or l i q u e f a c t i o n i n


extension mode are shown i n F i g . 5.22. The r e s u l t s f o r K c = 1.19, which
are interpolated from a previous study by Chem (1981), are also
presented In the f i g u r e .

The r e s u l t s f o r both l i q u e f a c t i o n and c y c l i c

mobility are presented here i n order to f a c i l i t a t e discussion of the


c r i t e r i a f o r occurrence of c y c l i c m o b i l i t y and l i q u e f a c t i o n .

Typical

results of s t r a i n development versus number of stress cycles for these


tests are shown i n F i g . 5.23.
For I s o t r o p i c a l l y consolidated sample, the c y c l i c stress applied
exceeded the steady state shear strength i n extension. Therefore, l i q u e f a c t i o n occurred i n extension mode. This i l l u s t r a t e s the importance of
examining the existence of steady state both i n compression and extension

Ottawa

Sand

2.0 kgf/cm
0.655 0.003
-51.5 1.0%
2

DTC
0.4

Q
A

0.3

CM

*c
1.0
1.5
2.0
(.19

-2.5%

0.2

4
N o t * ' X ' ' ' * sampla
d*v*lop*d liquefaction
n d

0.1

F i g . 5.22

10
No. of c y c l e s ,

20

50

100

c a

200

Cyclic stress required to cause 2.5% a x i a l s t r a i n for medium dense


Ottawa sand consolidated to various K r a t i o s .

^4

No. of cycles, N
F i g . 5.23

Typical strain.development vs number of cycles for medium dense


Ottawa sand consolidated to various K r a t i o s .
c
i
ON

177.
modes, i f significant amount of shear stress reversal is involved.
A l l anisotropically consolidated samples (K^ = 1.19, 1.5 and 2.0)
developed cyclic mobility (Fig. 5.22). The strain development versus
number of stress cycles (Fig. 5.23) is similar to that for the tailings
sand with similar Kc ratios.

Accelerated increase in axial deformation

was observed only i f transient state of zero effective stress occurred


after the sample state crossed the FT l i n e .
stress reversal (K

For the case with no shear

= 2.0), large deformation was developed In the f i r s t

loading cycle when the stress state reached the PT l i n e .

However, the

strain accumulation slowed down in the subsequent cycles because no


transient state of zero effective stress developed for the cyclic load
amplitude applied.

5.3

Resistance to Strain Development Under Cyclic Loading

It has been shown in the previous sections that large cyclic and
residual strains are developed once the sand develops liquefaction or
cyclic mobility particularly after reaching the transient state of zero
effective stress.

In the case of no shear stress reversal, the sand can

never reach the condition of zero effective stress under cyclic loading.
Nevertheless, large undesirable deformation could accumulate.
faction develops, large deformations are inevitable.

If lique-

Hence, the accumu-

lated strain Is often used as the failure critierion against cyclic loading.

The strain level considered as failure depends on the type and

relative importance of the earth structure considered.


The accumulation of strain during cyclic loading may be due to
liquefaction or cyclic mobility or a combination of both. Because of

178.
d i f f e r e n t s t r a i n development mechanism i n l i q u e f a c t i o n

and c y c l i c

m o b i l i t Jy , the influence of factors (e , ol , K ) on the resistance to


'
c
3c
c
s t r a i n development under c y c l i c loading i s l i k e l y to be influenced by the
mechanism of deformation as well as the s t r a i n l e v e l of i n t e r e s t .
If liquefaction

occurs, r e l a t i v e l y large deformation (at least

2.5%

a x i a l s t r a i n for the sands tested) w i l l be developed, once the liquefaction i s induced.

Therefore, i f 2.5% a x i a l s t r a i n development were used

as the f a i l u r e c r i t e r i o n , occurrence of liquefacton could be considered


as f a i l u r e .

However, i f higher s t r a i n l e v e l were s p e c i f i e d , then the

t o t a l s t r a i n to f i a l u r e could be the combination of l i q u e f a c t i o n


c y c l i c mobility following l i q u e f a c t i o n .

and

Such a case may be seen from the

s t r a i n development versus number of stress cycles f o r the t a i l i n g s sample


with K C = 1.5 and c y c l i c stress ratio of 0.157

i n F i g . 5.13.

The sand

accumulated about 3.5% a x i a l s t r a i n at the end of stress cycle i n which


liquefaction
and only l

1 / 2

developed.
%

Further accumulation of s t r a i n was

slowed down

additional s t r a i n developed i n the next stress

cycle.

Similar features of s t r a i n accumulation due to c y c l i c mobility following


liquefaction may be seen i n Figs. 5.1b and 5.2c.

Due

of these two mechanisms for development of specified

to the combination
l e v e l of s t r a i n , the

influence of f a c t o r s , e.g., s t a t i c shear, on the resistance to s t r a i n


development under c y c l i c loading may be d i f f e r e n t depending on whether
liquefaction

only or c y c l i c mobility only develops.

that 2.5% a x i a l s t r a i n due to liquefaction

It should be noted

i s for the l i m i t i n g case when

t o t a l shear stress Is s l i g h t l y greater than the steady state shear


strength.

When t o t a l shear stress i s considerably larger than the steady

state strength, much larger deformation w i l l be developed.


seen from the s t r a i n development due to l i q u e f a c t i o n

This may

i n Figs.

5.13

be
and

179.

5.16.
For

sand with state i n the t r a n s i t i o n region ( F i g .

potential due to s t r a i n softening i s very small.

4.17), the s t r a i n

It i s conceivable that

the s t r a i n developed due to s t r a i n softening under c y c l i c loading would


be very small as w e l l .

Thus, the s t r a i n development for such

initial

states may be regarded as due mainly to c y c l i c m o b i l i t y .

5.4

Influence of Certain Factors on the Undrained C y c l i c Loading


Behaviour

The most Important 'factors which Influence the undrained c y c l i c


loading behaviour of sand are void r a t i o , confining pressure and s t a t i c
shear s t r e s s .

The role of these factors on the undrained c y c l i c loading

behaviour of sands w i l l be discussed i n this s e c t i o n .

5.4.1

Void Radio or Relative Density


Most of the knowledge on undrained c y c l i c loading behaviour of

saturated sand has been derived from studies on natural rounded sands.
It i s generally believed that r e l a t i v e density i s the most important
factor controlling; occurrence of l i q u e f a c t i o n and c y c l i c m o b i l i t y .

Sand

with r e l a t i v e density less than about 40% has been suggested to always
develop l i q u e f a c t i o n , whereas sand with r e l a t i v e density greater than
about 45% c y c l i c m o b i l i t y , without reference to the p a r t i c l e characteri s t i c s and i n i t i a l stress condition of the sand.

It w i l l be shown In the

following that this may be a good approximation f o r rounded sand, but may
not be true for angular sand.
Consider the e f f e c t i v e stress state plot of the 3-D e f f e c t i v e stress

180.
state diagram at a constant void r a t i o as shown i n F i g . 4.31b.

From the

consolidation c h a r a c t e r i s t i c s of sand, i t was noted that the sand can be


consolidated to t h i s void r a t i o by various combination of i n i t i a l void
ratios e, and consolidation stress conditions a' and K .
i
3c
c

The sand with

i n i t i a l state to the l e f t of the ( a ' ) . = constant l i n e has no


lc crit
p o s s i b i l i t y to develop l i q u e f a c t i o n . It can only develop c y c l i c mobility
except
i n a small t r a n s i t i o n region
immediately
to the l e f t of (aj )
K
6
}
l c crit
= constant l i n e which may develop s l i g h t s t r a i n softening followed by
cyclic mobility.

On the other hand, sand with i n i t i a l state on or to the

right of (a I ) . = constant l i n e can develop l i q u e f a c t i o n i f the c y c l i c


lc c r i t
stress applied i s large enough to cause t o t a l shear stress greater than
i t s steady state shear strength.

Occurrence of these phenomena was

i l l u s t r a t e d by c y c l i c tests on samples with the same void r a t i o i n F i g s .


5.10 and 5.20.

It may be noted that a l l samples under low confining

pressure ( F i g . 5.20) developed c y c l i c m o b i l i t y , whereas samples under


high confining pressure could develop l i q u e f a c t i o n i f the shear stress
criterion for liquefaction i s s a t i s f i e d .

It may also be noted from F i g .

5.1c that l i q u e f a c t i o n can be induced i n samples with very high r e l a t i v e


density (more than 85%) i f the consolidation stresses are high enough.
For

Ottawa sand with rounded p a r t i c l e s the r e l a t i v e density seems to

be the most Important factor c o n t r o l l i n g the undrained c y c l i c loading


behaviour for the range of consolidation stresses considered herein.

For

sample with i n i t i a l r e l a t i v e density larger than about 45%, the steady


state can not be achieved even under high confining pressure, and hence
l i q u e f a c t i o n Is not expected under c y c l i c loading at least In the
compression mode. However, for I n i t i a l l y looser samples, l i q u e f a c t i o n
does occur under the same range of consolidation s t r e s s e s .

181.

Therefore, for sand with rounded p a r t i c l e s the r e l a t i v e density


gives a good i n d i c a t i o n as to the undrained c y c l i c loading behaviour
since a l i m i t i n g value of D ^ alone w i l l s u f f i c e to separate regions of
l i q u e f a c t i o n and c y c l i c m o b i l i t y .

However, for sand with angular

p a r t i c l e s , specifying the void r a t i o or r e l a t i v e density alone without


reference to the associated consolidation stress conditions i s not
s u f f i c i e n t to ascertain whether l i q u e f a c t i o n or c y c l i c mobility w i l l
develop during c y c l i c loading.
The Influence of void r a t i o or r e l a t i v e density on the occurrence of
l i q u e f a c t i o n Is that Increasing

the r e l a t i v e density increases

the

c r i t i c a l consolidation stress ( a ' ) . i n order to have the p o s s i b i l i t y


lc c r i t
to developv l in q u e f a c t i o n . This i s shown by
the increasing of (al )
J
lc crit
with decreasing

void r a t i o i n the 3-D

e f f e c t i v e stress state diagram

( F i g . 4.31).

5.4.2. Confining Pressure


Even specifying

and a^

f o r a sand i s s t i l l i n s u f f i c i e n t f o r a

prediction of the undrained c y c l i c loading behaviour with repsect to


development of l i q u e f a c t i o n or c y c l i c m o b i l i t y .
by two

This may

be i l l u s t r a t e d

samples with the same void r a t i o and confining pressure but with

d i f f e r e n t Kc

r a t i o s (Samples G and B i n F i g . 4.31b).

For Sample G,

steady state can not be achieved, and hence l i q u e f a c t i o n can not


developed.

the

be

For Sample B, however, the steady state can be achieved, and

l i q u e f a c t i o n can be developed i f the c y c l i c load Is large enough to cause


maximum shear stress greater than the steady state shear strength f o r the
void r a t i o under consideration.

This i s also true when the

sample state at G i s to the r i g h t of the (a' )

initial

= constant l i n e .

Such

182.
a behaviour i s i l l u s t r a t e d by the test r e s u l t s shown i n F i g .
C y c l i c mobility occurred i n samples with low K c
f a c t i o n developed i n samples with high K

5.10.

r a t i o , whereas lique-

r a t i o even though they had


c

i d e n t i c a l e^and 2 '
a

Furthermore, the occurrence of l i q u e f a c t i o n depends

on the amplitude of c y c l i c load applied.

This i s apparent from the

undrained behaviour of sand with K

i n F i g . 5.10

= 1.5

i n which the

c
lowest l e v e l of c y c l i c stress amplitude caused c y c l i c mobility instead of
l i q u e f a c t i o n at higher stress amplitudes.
For Ottawa sand, however, as discussed

i n the previous s e c t i o n , the

i n i t i a l r e l a t i v e density appears to be the most important factor controll i n g the occurrence of l i q u e f a c t i o n and c y c l i c mobility f o r the range of
consolidation stress considered h e r e i n .
The e f f e c t of l e v e l of confining pressure on the undrained c y c l i c
loading behaviour not only dictates the occurrence of l i q u e f a c t i o n or
c y c l i c mobility as discussed above, but also Influences
s t r a i n development under either type of response.

the resistance to

This may

be

illustra-

ted by the response of samples with the same void r a t i o and K^ratio

but

d i f f e r e n t confining pressures ( F i g . 5.24).


For samples i n the d i l a t i v e region (D1
can be developed.

and D 2 ) , only c y c l i c mobility

An increase i n confining pressure always results i n

increasing contractive tendency.

Therefore, f o r the same c y c l i c stress

r a t i o applied, the sample under higher confining pressure w i l l show a


f a s t e r pore pressure buildup with cycles of loading and reach the PT
e a r l i e r than that under lower confining pressure.

Therefore, the

resistance to s t r a i n development w i l l always decrease with increasing


confining pressure.

Evidence for this argument may

c y c l i c loading test r e s u l t s shown i n F i g s . 5.10

be seen from the

and 5.20.

For each K

line

5.24

I n f l u e n c e of c o n f i n i n g p r e s s u r e on the r e s i s t a n c e to
s t r a i n development under c y c l i c l o a d i n g .

134.
value for which c yJ c l i c mobility developed, the resistance curve a, /2a'
dcy
3c
vs N for lower confining pressure i s located higher than that for higher
confining pressure.

This reduced resistance to s t r a i n development due to

increasing confining pressure has also been observed by Vaid, Chern and
Tumi (1983) for both angular and rounded sands.

In their i n v e s t i g a t i o n ,

sands were tested under simple shear conditions with no s t a t i c shear and
i n i t i a l sand states which gave r i s e to only c y c l i c m o b i l i t y .
For samples In the contractive region (C^ and C
l i q u e f a c t i o n w i l l be developed, as discussed before.

i n F i g . 5.24),
In this region, two

aspects of the influence of the l e v e l of confining pressure may


F i r s t l y , due to the uniqueness of CSR,
required to reach the CSR
stress r a t i o .

the pore pressure r a t i o s

be noted.
Au/a^

line w i l l be the same under the same c y c l i c

However, due to the increased contractive tendency under

higher confining pressure i n Sample C2

than Sample C^, i t i s conceivable

that Sample C2 w i l l reach the CSR l i n e faster (less number of cycles)


than Sample C^.

In other words, the resistance to l i q u e f a c t i o n

(a,
/2a' required to reach CSR l i n e In a fixed number of cycles) w i l l
dcy
3c
be decreasing with increasing confining pressure.

Secondly, the poten-

t i a l to develop steady state deformation and the associated loss i n shear


resistance for sample under higher confining pressure i s always higher
than the one under lower confining pressure due to the uniqueness of
steady state strength ( F i g . 5.24).

Therefore, for sand under higher

confining pressure not only the l i q u e f a c t i o n i s easier to be induced but


also the deformation associated with l i q u e f a c t i o n and the loss i n shear
resistance Is more severe than those under lower confining pressure.

185.

5.4.3

Static Shear Stress or Consolidation Stress Ratio


For sand with a given e
c

and a ' , increasing K r a t i o may


3c
c

transform

the undrained c y c l i c loading behaviour of sand from c y c l i c mobility under


low Kc

r a t i o to l i q u e f a c t i o n under high Kc

shown i n e a r l i e r F i g . 5.10.

ratio.

This has been

Therefore, i n order to predict the undrained

c y c l i c loading behaviour of a sand sample, the shear stress component at


the end of consolidation has to be considered
r a t i o and confining pressure.

i n addition to the void

In t h i s regard the 3-D

e f f e c t i v e stress

state diagram developed under monotonic loading conditions, together with


the amplitude of c y c l i c loading imposed provides a complete d e s c r i p t i o n
as to the expected mechanism of s t r a i n development during undrained
c y c l i c loading of saturated sand.
Similar concept can also be used f o r Ottawa sand with rounded
p a r t i c l e s , with the difference that i n i t i a l r e l a t i v e density may

suffice

to predict the existence of steady state f o r the range of consolidation


stress considered

herein.

The influence of s t a t i c shear or K c


loading behaviour may

r a t i o on undrained c y c l i c

be i l l u s t r a t e d more c l e a r l y by p l o t t i n g the r e s i s t /

2a

ance to s t r a i n development ( < j C y' ' 3 c required to cause 2

1/2

and

5%

and al as a function
rc
Jc
Such test r e s u l t s f o r t a i l i n g s sand are shown i n F i g .

a x i a l s t r a i n i n 10 cycles) at fixed values of D


of K c

ratio.

5.25a at D r c
D

rc

= 69.5%

and a I

= 70% and a l = 16.0


Jc

sand at a l =2.0
Jc

=2.0

kgf/cm

kgf/cm

35.5%) are shown i n F i g s .

kgf/cm

(1568

(196 kPa) and i n F i g . 5.26a at

kPa).

Similar r e s u l t s for Ottawa

but d i f f e r e n t r e l a t i v e densities (51.5% and


5.25b and 5.26b.

Because of the d i f f e r e n t

mechanisms of s t r a i n development, the Influence of s t a t i c shear on the


undrained c y c l i c loading behaviour should be considered separately i n the

186.

0.6

(a) T a i l i n g s

Sand

a3c' = 2.0 k g f / c m
e
=0.80/ 0.002
D
=69.5 0 . 5 %
2

r c

0
0.4

(b) Offawo Sand


O ^ ' =2.0 k g f / c m
e
= 0 6 5 5 0.003
D
5 / . 5 1.0%
2

r c

0.3

- o

S = 5.0%
a

>!?

2.5 %

OJ
\
>
o

Liquefaction
(in
extension)

1.0

F i g . 5.25

N = 10

1.5

2.0

Influence of s t a t i c shear stress on the resistance


to strain development under c y c l i c loading: (a)
d i l a t i v e t a i l i n g s sand; (b) i n i t i a l l y medium dense
Ottawa sand.

187.

Ol
1.0

Fig.

1.5

5.26

L_

2.0

Influence of s t a t i c shear stress on the resistance to


s t r a i n development under c y c l i c loading: (a) contractive
t a i l i n g s sand; (b) i n i t i a l l y loose Ottawa sand.

188.
contractive and d i l a t i v e regions.

For t a i l i n g s sand under low confining

r
v
pressure,
the i n i t i a l sample
state was
'

constant for the void r a t i o considered.


of Kc
may

to the l e f t of (al )
._ =
lc crit
Therefore, samples at a l l l e v e l s

r a t i o being d i l a t i v e developed c y c l i c mobility ( F i g . 5.25a).

be seen that the resistance to c y c l i c mobility ( f o r 2.5%

i n 10 stress cycles) increased from 0.238 to 0.515


was

increased from 1.0

to 2.0.

ance to c y c l i c m o b i l i t y may

It

axial strain

when the Kc

ratio

Similar magnitude of increase i n r e s i s t -

be noted f o r s t r a i n l e v e l of 5%.

As

discussed i n Section 5^2.1, rapid accumulation of s t r a i n due to c y c l i c


mobility i s possible only when transient state of zero e f f e c t i v e stress
occurs during c y c l i c loading.

Therefore, the higher the s t a t i c shear,

the higher i s the c y c l i c stress amplitude required to cause t h i s


condition to occur and hence a consequent Increase In resistance to
cyclic mobility.
For Ottawa sand with D

= 51.5%, a trend s i m i l a r to that for t a i l -

rc
ings sand under low confining pressure may

be noted ( F i g .

5.25b).

However, unlike the t a i l i n g s sand, which developed c y c l i c mobility


regardless of the
ratio.
low K c

r a t i o , Ottawa sand developed l i q u e f a c t i o n at low

This has also been discussed e a r l i e r i n Section 5.2.3.

For

this

r a t i o , although the i n i t i a l sample state i s i n d i l a t i v e region

In the compression deformation mode, i t i s contractive i n the

extension

deformation mode. Therefore, l i q u e f a c t i o n would be induced i n extension


mode, i f the applied c y c l i c shear stress exceeds the steady state shear
strength i n extension.

As the s t a t i c shear stress i n compression

increases, the c y c l i c stress amplitude required to cause l i q u e f a c t i o n i n


extension mode also increases.

Thus the I n i t i a l increase i n resistance

to c y c l i c s t r a i n developments at low K c

r a t i o i n F i g . 5.25b i s due to a

189.

d i f f e r e n t s t r a i n development mechanisms.
compression below which l i q u e f a c t i o n
found to be around 1.10.
c y c l i c m o b i l i t y , and

could be Induced i n extension

Beyond t h i s K c

hence the

l i m i t i n g value of Y.^ i n

The

was

r a t i o , a l l samples developed

resistance to c y c l i c mobility increased

with increasing s t a t i c shear s t r e s s , which i s s i m i l a r to the behaviour o


t a i l i n g s sand that developed c y c l i c m o b i l i t y .
It may

also be noted from the r e s u l t s shown i n F i g . 5.25

that

the

resistance to c y c l i c mobility i s influence by the s t r a i n l e v e l adopted.


This i s more s i g n i f i c a n t i n the region of high s t a t i c shear.
under high s t a t i c shear stress l e v e l may

develop the

Sample

lower l e v e l of

prescribed s t r a i n i n a s p e c i f i e d number of stress c y c l e , but may


many more cycles to accumulate higher l e v e l of s t r a i n due

take

to the slow

down i n the rate of s t r a i n accumulation i n the case of non-stress


reversal ( F i g s . 5.21

and

5.23).

Therefore, the resistance curves diverg

rapidly i n the region of non-stress


For

reversal.

t a i l i n g s sand under high confining pressure, i . e . , i n i t i a l

stat

H
i s to the right of (al ) ._ = const, l i n e for the D
selected, lique
lc crit
rc
'

f a c t i o n can not be induced at low K c

r a t i o and

be developed, as discussed i n Section 5.1.4.


mobility may

only c y c l i c mobility
The

resistance to c y c l i c

be seen to increase with increasing K c

which i s similar to the behaviour of d i l a t i v e sands.

r a t i o ( F i g . 5.26a),
From the trend of

the curve, this increase i n resistance to c y c l i c m o b i l i t y peaked at


r a t i o of about 1.35.

At

this Kc

shear stresses approaches the


f o r the
Kc

considered.

values > 1.35

and

r a t i o , the sum

can

of s t a t i c and

Kc

cyclic

lower bound of steady state shear strength

Therefore, l i q u e f a c t i o n

s t a r t s to develop for

the resistance to l i q u e f a c t i o n decreases dramatic-

a l l y with increasing s t a t i c shear.

190.
For Ottawa sand at low r e l a t i v e density, similar trend as that of
the t a i l i n g s sand under high confining pressure may be noted ( F i g .
5.26b).

Relative values of the steady state shear strength and c y c l i c

shear stress applied were such that the i s o t r o p i c a l l y consolidated sample


should not develop l i q u e f a c t i o n .

Therefore, the increase i n resistance

with i n i t i a l increase i n K c should be the r e s u l t of c y c l i c mobility


developed.

It was, however, found that this increase i n resistance at

low Kc ratio was due to the occurrence of l i q u e f a c t i o n i n extension


mode and not the development of c y c l i c m o b i l i t y .

Increasing the s t a t i c

shear i n compression increases the c y c l i c load amplitude required to


exceed the steady state shear strength i n extension.

This trend

continues u n t i l the s t a t i c shear stress i s high enough to cause liquefaction i n compression mode. This l e v e l of s t a t i c shear was found to be
corresponding

to Kc r a t i o of about 1.15. Beyond this s t a t i c shear

stress l e v e l , l i q u e f a c t i o n always developed In compression mode, and the


resistance to l i q u e f a c t i o n decreased with increasing s t a t i c shear stress
level.
From the above r e s u l t s on both sands, i t may be concluded that the
resistance to l i q u e f a c t i o n always decreases with increasing s t a t i c shear
stress l e v e l .
diagram.

This may be explained from the 3-D e f f e c t i v e stress state

As discussed i n Sections 5.1.1, occurrence of liquefaction i s

due to the e f f e c t i v e stress state of contractive sand reaching the CSR


state and consequent i n i t i a t i o n of s t r a i n softening response leading to
steady state deformation.

Therefore, the resistance to liquefaction, i s

nothing but the c y c l i c stress ratio required to move the sample state to
the CSR state i n a fixed number of stress c y c l e s .

For easy v i s u a l i z a -

t i o n , this may be I l l u s t r a t e d by the e f f e c t i v e stress path plot of 3-D

191
e f f e c t i v e stress state diagram at constant e c as shown i n F i g .
Tt may

5.27.

be noted i n this figure that the stress space to be traversed

the l e f t tn order to reach the CSR

to

state i s less i n the case of sand with

higher s t a t i c shear stress (case 2) than the sand with lower s t a t i c shear
stress (case 1) .

Therefore, the c y c l i c stress r a t i o or the number of

stress cycles required to move the sample state from the i n i t i a l state to
the CSR

state i s less for higher Kc

faction i s l e s s .
(Fig.

and hence the resistance to lique-

From the trend of the l i q u e f a c t i o n resistance curves

5.26), i t appears that the resistance to l i q u e f a c t i o n would be very

low when a sand sample i s i n i t i a l l y


close to the CSR

state.

consolidated

to an i n i t i a l

state

Slight shear disturbance or even a pore pressure

increase could cause the sand to develop l i q u e f a c t i o n . This would


correspond to the phenomenon of spontaneous l i q u e f a c t i o n , and w i l l be
discussed

further in Section

5.6.

Comparing the stress states at CSR


i t may

f o r Samples 1 and 2 i n F i g .

5.27,

further be noted that the potential to develop steady state

deformation i n Sample 2 i s much higher than that i n Sample 1.

Much

severe loss of resistance and larger deformation w i l l be developed In


Sample 2, once l i q u e f a c t i o n i s i n i t i a t e d .
s t r a i n development due

This may

to l i q u e f a c t i o n i n F i g .

5.13.

Behaviour of sand a n i s o t r o p i c a l l y consolidated


not within the scope of this i n v e s t i g a t i o n .

also be seen from the

i n extension mode was

Chung (1984) found that

increasing the s t a t i c shear i n extension mode also causes decrease i n


resistance to l i q u e f a c t i o n for Ottawa sand.

The

resistance curve i n F i g .

5.26b can thus be extended in the extension region.

Chung's findings are

consistent with those reported herein and could be explained


framework of steady state concepts.

within

the

192.

1/2

F i g . 5.27

(oy+ oy)

Schematic i l l u s t r a t i o n showing the influence of s t a t i c


shear stress on the resistance to l i q u e f a c t i o n under
c y c l i c loading.

193.
From che examination of results for both sands i n the contractive
and d i l a t i v e regions, completely different trends i n l i q u e f a c t i o n and
c y c l i c mobility response may be noted.

Increasing the s t a t i c shear

stress to the same l e v e l , e.g., Kc = 2.0, the resistance to c y c l i c


mobility ( f o r 2.5% e ) increased from 0.238 to 0.515 f o r t a i l i n g s sand
a
and from 0.167 to 0.308 f o r Ottawa sand ( F i g . 5.25a,b), whereas the
resistance to l i q u e f a c t i o n decreased from 0.176 to 0.074 for t a i l i n g s
sand and from 0.114 to 0.056 f o r Ottawa sand ( F i g . 5.26a,b).

Therefore,

i t may be concluded that the resistance to s t r a i n development could


decrease or increase depending on whether l i q u e f a c t i o n or c y c l i c mobility
i s involved.

It Is often believed (Lee and Seed, 1967 , 1970) that s o i l

element i n slope i s more resistant to c y c l i c s t r a i n development than that


under the l e v e l ground and suggestion i s made that c r i t i c a l i n i t i a l state
would correspond to i s o t r o p i c consolidation, which represent an I n i t i a l l y
zero s t a t i c shear.

This w i l l be true for s o i l elements which develop

c y c l i c mobility o n l y .

On the contrary, according to Castro and Poulos

(1977) and Casagrande (1975), the resistance to s t r a i n development for


s o i l element i n the slope i s always less than that under the l e v e l ground
and the suggestion

i s made that tests be performed on a n i s o t r o p i c a l l y

consolidated samples simulating appropriate i n i t i a l s t a t i c shear.

Again,

this w i l l be true for s o i l elements which develop l i q u e f a c t i o n only.


Therefore, a clear understanding of the mechanism responsible f o r s t r a i n
development i s necessary for a r a t i o n a l assessment of influence of
c e r t a i n factors on the undrained c y c l i c loading response of sand.
It i s also i n t e r e s t i n g to note that the Influences of s t a t i c shear
stress on the undrained monotonic and c y c l i c loading behaviour are
similar.

Increasing the s t a t i c shear stress l e v e l for fixed e

and a'

194.
can transform a sand from s t r a i n hardening response to l i q u e f a c t i o n under
monotonic loading conditions, and from c y c l i c mobility to l i q u e f a c t i o n
under c y c l i c loading conditions.

The resistance to l i q u e f a c t i o n (stress

increment u n t i l peak i n monotonic loading) was found to decrease with


Increasing s t a t i c shear stress l e v e l under both loading conditions.
However, this s i m i l a r i t y can not be applied to monotonic s t r a i n hardening
response and c y c l i c m o b i l i t y .

Under monotonic loading conditions, the

shear stress increment (Aa,/2al ) required to reach the PT state i s of


d
Jc
a

concern, whereas the c y c l i c stress ( ^C y^2c ^

re

iuired

to accumulate a

specified amount of s t r a i n i s of i n t e r e s t under c y c l i c loading conditions.

The former constitutes a strength c r i t e r i o n , while the l a t t e r i s

a deformation c r i t e r i o n .

The shear stress increment required to reach

the PT l i n e under monotonic loading was found to decrease with increasing


s t a t i c shear which i s the reverse of the resistance to c y c l i c m o b i l i t y .

5.5

Prediction of Undrained C y c l i c Loading Behaviour

It was shown i n Section 4.4.2 that 3-D e f f e c t i v e stress state


diagram gives a complete d e s c r i p t i o n of undrained behaviour under monotonic loading conditions, given the i n i t i a l state (e , a' , K ) of the
c
Jc
c
sand.

Under c y c l i c loading conditions, i t has further been shown i n

Sections 5.1 and 5.2 that the undrained behaviour depends i n addition on
the amplitude of c y c l i c loads a p p l i e d .

The necessary c r i t e r i a for l i q u e -

f a c t i o n to occur under c y c l i c loading conditions are 1) the sand must


have the p o t e n t i a l to develop steady state deformation, i . e . , the steady
state can be achieved, and 2) the c y c l i c load amplitude applied must be
large enough to cause the maximum shear stress ( s t a t i c + c y c l i c )

greater

195.

than i t s steady state shear strength and 3) s u f f i c i e n t number of load


cycles are applied to move e f f e c t i v e stress state of sand to the
line.

CSR

Otherwise, only c y c l i c mobility or very small deformation can be

developed.
From the consolidation c h a r a c t e r i s t i c s of sand and the
mentioned above, a flow chart may

criteria

be drawn to examine whether l i q u e f a c -

t i o n can be developed i n a sand with a given i n i t i a l state and


loads.

This i s shown i n F i g .

applied

5.28.

In order to examine the f i r s t c r i t e r i o n , the i n i t i a l state of the


sand Is located l n the 3-D

e f f e c t i v e stress state diagram.

This i n i t i a l

state of the sand i s obtained d i r e c t l y from the known void r a t i o e

and

the stress conditions i n the ground or from the known I n i t i a l void r a t i o

ej_ and the consolidation stress c o n d i t i o n s .

For sand elements with

i n i t i a l states below the c r i t i c a l consolidation stress (a! ) . ^ surface


lc crit
( F i g . 4.31), i . e . , steady state can not he achieved, only c y c l i c mobility
(together with s l i g h t s t r a i n softening for states s l i g h t l y below
(al

) . surface) can be induced, regardless of the c y c l i c


lc crit

applied.

loads

For sand elements with i n i t i a l state on or above the

( a l c ) c r ^ t s u r f a c e , i . e . , steady state can be achieved, p o t e n t i a l to


develop l i q u e f a c t i o n always e x i s t s .
a

For Ottawa sand with rounded p a r t i c l e s , the ( ] ^ c r i t *

difficult

At loose e., (al ) .^ i s extremely


small (see Figure 4.13).
J
1'
lc crit
In fact the s t r a i n softening and d i l a t i v e branch o f f does not appear even
to obtain.

at

values as small as 0.13

kgf/cm

e., (al ) . i s exceptionally l a r g e .


I'
lc crit
J
O

(12.7

kPa).

And

at s l i g h t l y denser

However, the i n i t i a l r e l a t i v e

density alone gives a good p r e d i c t i o n as to the p o t e n t i a l to develop


liquefaction.

196.

3-D Effective Stress


State Diagram

Steady State Exist?

>

S ?
us

Cyclic Mobility

Yes
Liquefaction

F i g . 5.28

Flow chart for assessing the p o t e n t i a l of l i q u e f a c t i o n


or c y c l i c m o b i l i t y .

197.
Once the p o t e n t i a l to develop l i q u e f a c t i o n i s determined and i s
found to e x i s t , the second c r i t e r i o n has to be examined.

Liquefaction i

p o s s i b l e , regardless of the i n t e n s i t y of the c y c l i c loads applied, i f th


i n i t i a l s t a t i c shear stress i s greater than the steady state shear
strength of the s o i l element, which i s a unique function of i t s e c .
This condition should always be avoided because combinations of pore
pressure generated from c y c l i c loading and possible r e d i s t r i b u t i o n of
pore pressure i n the surrounding s o i l elements during and a f t e r c y c l i c
loading may cause l i q u e f a c t i o n and associated large deformations.
However, i f the s t a t i c shear stress i s less than the steady state shear
strength, l i q u e f a c t i o n i s possible only when the maximum shear stress
( s t a t i c + c y c l i c ) i s greater than the steady state shear strength.
Otherwise, only c y c l i c mobility can be developed.
It may be pointed out that very l i m i t e d amount of monotonic loading
tests have to be c a r r i e d out i n order to e s t a b l i s h the 3-D e f f e c t i v e
stress state diagram of sand.

The key aspects of the undrained c y c l i c

loading behaviour of a l l s o i l elements i n the earth structure can then b


predicted from the 3-D e f f e c t i v e stress state diagram and c y c l i c load
applied, i . e . , whether l i q u e f a c t i o n or c y c l i c mobility w i l l develop, thu
enabling a f i r s t hand i d e n t i f i c a t i o n of the mechanism responsible f o r
s t r a i n development under c y c l i c loading conditions.
5.6

Phenomenon of Spontaneous L i q u e f a c t i o n

As discussed i n the l a s t two chapters, l i q u e f a c t i o n i s the r e s u l t o


occurrence of s t r a i n softening response leading to steady state deformat i o n when the e f f e c t i v e stress state of sands i s brought to the CRS
state.

This s t r a i n softening response can occur i f p o t e n t i a l for l i q u e -

198.

faction exists and when the total shear stress acting on the s o i l element
is greater than i t s steady state shear strength.
occur on account of some shear disturbance

The change i n state can

applied to the s o i l element,

which can be either s t a t i c or c y c l i c i n nature.

If this disturbance i s

very small, the phenomenon Is called spontaneous l i q u e f a c t i o n .


The

shear disturbance

under s t a t i c conditions can be caused by

increases In shear stress due to erosion of toe of slope or surcharge


applied on slope.

It was shown by Eq. 4.6 i n Section 4.4.2 that for

t a i l i n g s sand the shear stress increment to reach the CSR state under
monotonic loading conditions decreases as the s t a t i c shear stress acting
on the sand increases.

When the i n i t i a l sample state i s close to the CSR

state, the shear stress increment required to I n i t i a t e l i q u e f a c t i o n i s


very small.

This may also be seen from the r e l a t i o n s h i p of pore pressure

generated u n t i l the CSR state due to monotonic loading versus K c r a t i o


in F i g s . 4.24 and 4.28 for both sands.

For sand consolidated

to even

higher Kc r a t i o , I.e., i n the region of contractive deformation ( F i g .


4.17), a s l i g h t increase i n shear stress can trigger s t r a i n softening
response leading to steady state deformation.

Such a phenomenon was

i l l u s t r a t e d by the example i n F i g . 4.19. By an Increase In shear stress


less than 8% of the s t a t i c shear s t r e s s , catastrophic f a i l u r e was
Induced.
From the trend of resistance to l i q u e f a c t i o n versus K c r a t i o
curves shown i n F i g . 5.26, i t appears that the resistance to l i q u e f a c t i o n
i s very small when the sand i s consolidated
state.

to a state close to the CSR

For Ottawa sand consolidated to K c r a t i o of 2.0, the resistance

to l i q u e f a c t i o n i s about 0.056.

The shear stress disturbance

magnitude corresponds to earthquake with a

of this

of 0.05g according

to the

199.
s i m p l i f i e d procedure proposed by Seed and I d r i s s (1971).

Such a small

change i n shear stress required to cause i n s t a b i l i t y i s indeed a case of


spontaneous l i q u e f a c t i o n .

For K c

r a t i o higher than 2.0, the shear

disturbance required to cause l i q u e f a c t i o n i s even lower.

For t a i l i n g s

sand, however, due to r e l a t i v e l y high confining pressure Involved, the


c y c l i c stress r a t i o under this confining pressure corresponds to a r e l a t i v e l y strong earthquake even though the c y c l i c stress r a t i o Is very low.
Besides the shear stress disturbance discussed above, the change In
sample state can also occur due to r i s e i n pore pressure.

This r i s e of

pore pressure could be the result of f l u c t u a t i o n of ground water l e v e l or


r e d i s t r i b u t i o n of excess pore pressure during or a f t e r earthquake
from the surrounding s o i l elements.

shaking

To i l l u s t r a t e this mechanism of

i n i t i a t i o n of l i q u e f a c t i o n , s p e c i a l tests were performed on both sands.


An i n i t i a l l y loose sample was consolidated a n i s o t r o p i c a l l y to K c
of 2.0, and a i

=2.0

kgf/cm

(980 kPa) f o r t a i l i n g s sand.

ratio

(196 kPa) f o r Ottawa sand and 10.0 kgf/cm


Back pressure was

then increased slowly

while maintaining the s t a t i c shear stress constant.

By doing so the

e f f e c t i v e stress state of sand was moved h o r i z o n t a l l y toward the CSR


line.

After the e f f e c t i v e stress state reached the state corresponding

to the CSR s t a t e , the drainage l i n e was closed.


pore pressure was

observed which was

A s l i g h t Increase i n

followed by a catastrophic f a i l u r e

i n a manner s i m i l a r to that observed during l i q u e f a c t i o n .


results for both sands are shown i n F i g s . 5.29

and

Typical

5.30.

Thus spontaneous l i q u e f a c t i o n w i l l be triggered as soon as the


sample state reaches the CSR

state under undrained conditions due to a

very small disturbance at which s t r a i n softening response leading to


steady state deformation i s i n i t i a t e d .

This phenomenon can, however,

200.

F i g . 5.29

Spontaneous l i q u e f a c t i o n induced by pore pressure increase in


i n i t i a l l y loose Ottawa sand.

201 .

2.0

4.0

6.0

8.0

to/

1/2 (oy+oy)
F i g . 5.30

10.0

12.0

(kgf/cm )
2

Spontaneous liquefaction induced by pore pressure increase in


contractive t a i l i n g s sand.

202.

occur only i f the sand i s subjected to s t a t i c shear stress greater than


i t s steady state shear strength.

For t a i l i n g s sand, this s i t u a t i o n can

e x i s t only when an i n i t i a l l y loose sample i s consolidated to high confining pressure and high K c r a t i o .

This i s shown i n F i g .

5.31.

It may

be seen that for i n i t i a l l y loose sample with K c = 2.0 the confining


pressure o l ^ has to be greater than 7.0 kgf/cm

(686 kPa) i n order to

have s t a t i c shear stress greater than i t s steady state shear strength.


For

sand with K c = 1.5, the s t a t i c shear stress i s always less than i t s

steady state shear strength for the range of consolidation stress


considered.

Therefore, under this K c (= 1.5) r a t i o , sand i s always

safe against such kind of f a i l u r e .

Due to very high confining pressure

required to have the condition discussed above to e x i s t f o r K c = 2.0, a


very large pore pressure Increase Is required In order to bring about
such a f a i l u r e .

In the example shown i n F i g . 5.30, an increase i n pore

pressure by about 3.0 kgf/cm

(294 kPa), which corresponds to a r i s e of

30 m i n water head, i s necessary to t r i g g e r spontaneous l i q u e f a c t i o n .


Therefore, i t appears there i s rare p o s s i b i l i t y f o r such f a i l u r e to be
induced i n t a i l i n g s sand unless the sand i s consolidated to K c

ratio

close to or greater than the CSR.


Rounded Ottawa sand, however, behaves quite d i f f e r e n t l y compared to
the angular t a i l i n g s sand.

For i n i t i a l l y loose sample under K c

ratio

of 1.5 and 2.0, as shown i n F i g . 5.32, the s t a t i c shear stress i s higher


than i t s steady state shear strength under low confining pressure. The
r a t i o of s t a t i c shear stress to the steady state shear strength decreases
with increasing confining pressure. The l e v e l of confining pressure
below which the s t a t i c shear stress i s greater than i t s steady state
shear strength depends on the K c r a t i o of the sand.

For i n i t i a l l y

0.95Consolidation Curve
(ej =1.0}

Tailings Sand

Static Shear Sfress


(Kc= 1.5, ej =100)
Steady

State Shear

Strength

Static Shear Stress


(Kc = 2 0, e, = 1.00,
0.70- 100

0 1

0.2

0.5

Static
Fig. 5.31

Shear

1.0

Stress

2.0

5.0

10 0

20.0

T or Steady Stare Shear Strength S


s

U 3

50.0

100.0

(Kgf/cm )

Comparison of r e l a t i v e v a l u e s of s t a t i c shear s t r e s s and steady s t a t e shear


f o r t a i l i n g s sand at two K
ratios.

strength

0.80Ottawa

10

Sand

20

0.75
Consolidation C u r v e
(e; = 0.725)

30

0.70-

40

o
<D

Static

Shear

Stress

( K c = l.5, ej = 0.725)
o

Steady

0.65

"a

Stale Shear

50

Strength

Stotic Shear Stress


(K c =2.0, e, - 0.725)

60

0.60

70

>
80
0.55
90

0.50
0.1

100
0.2

0.5

Static
F i g . 5.32

Shear

1.0

Stress

2.0

5.0

10.0

20.0

or Steady State Shear Strength

50.0

U 3

100.0

(kgf/cm )

Comparison of r e l a t i v e v a l u e s of s t a t i c shear s t r e s s and steady s t a t e shear


f o r Ottawa sand a t two K
ratios.
c

strength
o

205.
loose sand, i t i s about 5.0 and 20.0 kgf/cm
r a t i o of 1.5 and 2.0

respectively.

(490 and 1960 kPa) f o r K c

Therefore, sand with rounded

p a r t i c l e s i s more susceptable to spontaneous l i q u e f a c t i o n .

Relatively

small pore pressure increase has to occur i n order to reach the CSR
and consequently trigger l i q u e f a c t i o n .

state

206.

CHAPTER 6
CONCLUSIONS

Undrained monotonic and c y c l i c loading behaviour of a saturated


angular and a rounded sand has been studied under t r i a x i a l conditions
over a confining pressure ranging up to 25.0 kgf/cm
i s o t r o p i c and anisotropic consolidation h i s t o r i e s .

(2450 kPa) and both


The fange of beha-

viour under monotonic loading spanned between s t r a i n hardening at one end


to various degrees of s t r a i n softening (termed l i q u e f a c t i o n or l i m i t e d
liquefaction) at the other.

S i m i l a r l y , the range of behaviour respons-

i b l e for development of s t r a i n under c y c l i c loading consisted of liquefaction or c y c l i c mobility or a combination of both.

C y c l i c mobility

refers to the development of s t r a i n during c y c l i c loading which i s not


due to the occurrence of s t r a i n softening response.

These d e f i n i t i o n s of

l i q u e f a c t i o n and c y c l i c mobility now enjoy a general acceptance among


researchers.

Based on test results on angular sand, the following

conclusions may be drawn.


1)

Under monotonic loading, the s t r a i n softening response i s i n i t i -

ated at a c r i t i c a l value of e f f e c t i v e . s t r e s s r a t i o (CSR), regardless of


the r e l a t i v e density and consolidation stress conditions of the sand.
2)

The termination of s t r a i n softening response, which i s charac-

terized by the s t a r t of d i l a t i o n (PT S t a t e ) , also occurs at a unique


value of e f f e c t i v e stress r a t i o , regardless of the r e l a t i v e density and
consolidation stress conditions of the sand.

When s t r a i n hardening

response develops, the start of d i l a t i o n , characterized by a decrease i n


pore pressure a f t e r a p o s i t i v e maximum value, also occurs at the same
e f f e c t i v e stress r a t i o as the PT state of s t r a i n softening response.

207.
3)

Under extension loading, the CSR i s less than that i n compres-

s i o n , but the e f f e c t i v e stress ratios at PT state i n compression and


extension are the same.
4)

Under monotonic loading, the stress conditions at PT state f o r

s t r a i n hardening response form a series of l i n e s i n void r a t i o - e f f e c t i v e


confining pressure p l o t .

These l i n e s are function of i n i t i a l void r a t i o

only, regardless of the consolidation stress conditions.

With

Increasing

consolidation s t r e s s e s , these l i n e s f o r various i n i t i a l void r a t i o merge


into a unique steady state l i n e representing s t r a i n softening response,
characterized as l i m i t e d or true l i q u e f a c t i o n .

This implies that the

concept of unique steady state l i n e can be used even when the sand
develops s t r a i n softening response with s i g n i f i c a n t s t r a i n p o t e n t i a l
(greater than about 2% f o r the sand tested) and i s not necessarily
r e s t r i c t e d to unlimited s t r a i n c h a r a c t e r i s t i c s of true l i q u e f a c t i o n .
5)

From the consolidation c h a r a c t e r i s t i c s and stress conditions at

PT s t a t e , a r e l a t i o n s h i p between void r a t i o

e^

and c r i t i c a l

consolida-

tion stress (al ) . emerges.


Sand at a void r a t i o e under consolidaa
lc c r i t
c
tion stress al > (al ) . f o r e w i l l develop l i q u e f a c t i o n , regardless
lc
lc crit
c
of the i n d i v i d u a l magnitudes of K and

^ ^ lc^crit'

s t r a i n hardening or s l i g h t s t r a i n softening response w i l l develop.


( l )
a

C T

^
ec -

l i n e thus provides a quantitative d i v i s i o n of i n i t i a l states

i n t o regions of l i q u e f a c t i o n and s t r a i n hardening response on undrained


loading.
6)

A 3-D e f f e c t i v e stress state diagram f o r the sand characterizes

comprehensively the anticipated monotonic loading response of sand from


the knowledge of i t s end of consolidation state e , a' and K .

c
3c
c
a

This

state diagram i n e c > l/2(cj+a^), l/2(aj-a^) space features a ( [ c ) c r t

208.
surface which separates end of consolidation states of sand into regions
of l i q u e f a c t i o n and s t r a i n hardening response or s l i g h t s t r a i n softening
response.
for

A knowledge of the complete i n i t i a l state of sand i s necessary

assessment of the anticipated monotonic loading response.

This

response can not be predicted by s p e c i f y i n g r e l a t i v e density alone or


even the combination of r e l a t i v e density and confining pressure.

The 3-D

e f f e c t i v e stress state diagram also o f f e r s a r a t i o n a l explanation as to


the influence of r e l a t i v e density, confining pressure and s t a t i c shear
stress on the monotonic loading behaviour.
7)

Under c y c l i c loading, the s t r a i n development could be due to

l i q u e f a c t i o n or c y c l i c mobility or the combination of both.

If l i q u e f a c -

tion develops, the CSR, e f f e c t i v e stress r a t i o at PT state and steady


state l i n e are the same as those observed under monotonic loading. If
c y c l i c mobility develops, the e f f e c t i v e stress r a t i o at PT state i s also
the same as that observed under monotonic loading.

Therefore, the stress

conditions which characterize the key features of s t r a i n softening and


s t r a i n hardening response are not influenced by the type of load (monotonic or c y c l i c ) applied, and thus the 3-D e f f e c t i v e stress state diagram
provides a l i n k between monotonic and c y c l i c loading behaviour.
8)

The 3-D e f f e c t i v e stress state diagram developed for monotonic

loading can be used to develop the c r i t e r i a f o r the occurrence of liquef a c t i o n and c y c l i c m o b i l i t y .


f a c t i o n are:
(a! ) .
lc c r i t

The c r i t e r i a f o r the occurrence of l i q u e -

( 1 ) the i n i t i a l sand state must l i e on or above the

surface, (2) the maximum shear stress ( s t a t i c + c y c l i c ) i s


'

greater than the steady state shear strength, and ( 3 ) s u f f i c i e n t number


of load cycles are applied to move the e f f e c t i v e stress state of sand to
the CSR l i n e .

Otherwise, only cycTic moblity or very small deformation

209.
can be developed.
9)

The

influences of r e l a t i v e density and confining pressure on

the

c y c l i c loading behaviour are s i m i l a r to those on the monotonic loading


behaviour.

However, the influence of s t a t i c shear stress on c y c l i c load-

ing behavior could be quite d i f f e r e n t depending on whether l i q u e f a c t i o n


or c y c l i c mobility i s developed.

If the sand develops l i q u e f a c t i o n , an

increase i n s t a t i c shear stress always r e s u l t s i n a decrease i n r e s i s t ance to l i q u e f a c t i o n . On the other hand, i f i t develops c y c l i c m o b i l i t y ,
increasing s t a t i c shear stress always r e s u l t s i n an increase i n r e s i s t ance to c y c l i c m o b i l i t y .

These conclusions

are i n agreement with those

suggested by Castro and Seed i f a proper recognition of the mechanism of


s t r a i n development under c y c l i c loading i s made.
The conclusions
angular sand.

drawn above are based on the r e s u l t s of tests on

These conclusions

are also true for rounded sand.

However, for the range of consolidation stress considered herein


range of

al
Jc

(the

considered i s larger than what would be encountered In

most p r a c t i c a l s i t u a t i o n s ) , the i n i t i a l r e l a t i v e density alone provides a


good single parameter for characterizing this i n i t i a l state of rounded
sand.

For i n i t i a l l y loose s t a t e s , the sand always develops l i q u e f a c t i o n ,

regardless of the i n i t i a l stress conditions.

The response, however,

changes to s t r a i n hardening or s l i g h t l y s t r a i n softening i f i n i t i a l r e l a tive density exceeds a certain minimum value (about 40%
tested).

for the sand

It appears that the l i q u e f a c t i o n response i n rounded sand i s

related to an i n i t i a l loose s t r u c t u r e , which i s not altered even a f t e r


the application of large confining pressure.

210.

REFERENCES

Bishop, A.V., Webb, D. and Skinner, A.E. (1965). " T r i a x i a l Tests on


S o i l s at Elevated C e l l Pressure," Proc. 6th ICSMFE, Montreal, V o l . 1, pp.
170-174.
Bjerrum, L., Kringstad, S. and Kummeneje, 0. (1961). "The Shear Strength
of Fine Sand," Proc. 5th ICSMFE, P a r i s , V o l . 1, pp. 29-37.
Casagrande, A. (1936). "Characteristics of Cohesionless Soils Affecting
the S t a b i l i t y of Slopes and Earth F i l l s , " J o u r , of the Boston Society of
C i v i l Engineers, Jan. 1936.
Casagrande, A. (1975). "Liquefaction and C y c l i c Deformation of Sands, A
C r i t i c a l Review," Proc. 5th Pan American Conf. on S o i l Mech. and Found.
Engng., Buenos A i r e s , V o l . 5, pp. 79-133.
Castro, G. (1969). "Liquefaction of Sands," Ph.D. Thesis, Harvard S o i l
Mech. Series, No. 81, Harvard U n i v e r s i t y .
Castro, G. (1975). "Liquefaction and C y c l i c Mobility of Saturated
Sands," Jour, of the Geot. Engng. D i v . , ASCE, V o l . 101, No. GT6, Proc.
Paper 11388, pp. 551-569.
Castro, G. and Poulos, S.J. (1977). "Factors Affecting Liquefaction and
C y c l i c Mobility," Jour, of the Geot. Engng. Div., ASCE, V o l . 103, No.
GT6, Proc. Paper 12994, pp. 501-516.
Castro, G., Poulos, S.J., France, J.W. and Enos, J . L . (1982).
"Liquefaction Induced by Cyclic Loading," Report Submitted to National
Science Foundation, March, 1982.
Chern, J.C. (1981). "Effect of S t a t i c Shear on Resistance to
Liquefaction," M.A.Sc. Thesis, The University of B r i t i s h Columbia,
Vancouver, Canada.
DeAlba, P., Seed, H.B. and Chan, C K . (1976). "Sand Liquefaction i n
Large-Scale Simple Shear Tests," Jour, of the Geot. Engng. Div., ASCE,
V o l . 102, No. GT9, Proc. Paper 12403, pp. 909-927.
Dobry, R. and Alvarez, L . (1967). "Seismic Failures of Chilean T a i l i n g s
Dams," Jour, of the S o i l Mech. and Found. Div., ASCE, V o l . 93, No. SM6,
Proc. Paper 5582, pp. 237-260.
Finn, W.D.L. (1981). "Liquefaction P o t e n t i a l : Developments Since 1976,"
I n t . Conf. on Recent Advances In Geot. E a r t h . Engng. and S o i l Dynamics,
St. Louis, M0, pp. 655-681.
Finn, W.D.L. and Byrne, P.M. (1976). "Liquefaction Potential of Mine
Tailings Dams," Proc. 12th I n t . Conf. on Large Dams, Mexico C i t y , V o l . 1,
pp. 153-177.

211 .
Finn, W.D.L., Pickering, D.J. and Bransby, P.L. (1971). "Sand
Liquefaction i n T r i a x i a l and Simple Shear Tests," Jour, of the Soil Mech.
and Found. Div., ASCE, V o l . 97, No. SM4, Proc. Paper 2039, pp. 639-659.
Finn, W.D.L. and Vaid, Y.P. (1977). "Liquefaction Potential from Drained
Constant Volume Cyclic Simple Shear Tests," Proc. 6th World Conf. on
Earth. Engng., New Delhi, Session 6, pp. 7-12.
Green, G.E. (1969). "Strength and Compressibility of Granular Materials
Under Generalized Strain Conditions," Ph.D. Thesis, University of London,
Imperial College of Science and Technology.
Gueze, E . (1948). " C r i t i c a l Density of Some Dutch Sands," P r o c , 2nd
ICSMFE, Rotterdam, V o l . 3, pp. 125-130.
Horn, H.M. and Deere, D.U. (1962). " F r i c t i o n a l Characteristics of
Minerals," Geotechnique, V o l . 12, No. 4, pp. 319-335.
Ishihara, K., Tatsuoka, F. and Yasuda, S. (1975). "Undrained Deformation
and Liquefaction of Sand Under Cyclic Stresses," S o i l s and Foundations,
V o l . 15, No. 1, pp. 29-44.
Klohn, E.J., Maartman, C.H., Lo, R.C.Y. and Finn, W.D.L. (1978).
"Simplified Seismic Analysis for T a i l i n g s Dams," P r o c , ASCE Specialty
Conf. on Earth. Engng. and S o i l Dynamics, Pasadena, CA., pp. 540-556.
Koppejan, A.W., Wamelen, B.M. and Weinberg, L . J . (1948). "Coastal Flow
Slides i n the Dutch Province of Zeeland," P r o c , 2nd ICSMFE, Rotterdam,
V o l . 5, pp. 89-96.
Lee, I.K. (1966). "Stress-Dilatancy Performance of Feldspar," Jour, of
the S o i l Mech. and Found. Div., ASCE, V o l . 92, No. SM2, Proc. Paper 4734,
pp. 79-108.
Lee, K.L. (1978). "End Restraint E f f e c t s on Undrained Static T r i a x i a l
Strength of Sand," Jour, of the Geot. Engng. Div., ASCE, V o l . 104, No.
GT6, Proc. Paper 13838, pp. 687-704.
1

Lee, K.L. and Seed, H.B. (1967 ). " C y c l i c Stress Conditions Causing
Liquefaction of Sand," Jour, of the S o i l Mech. and Found. Div., ASCE,
V o l . 93, No. SMI, Proc. Paper 5058, pp. 47-70.
2

Lee, K.L. and Seed, H.B. (1967 ). "Dynamic Strength of A n i s o t r o p i c a l l y


Consolidated Sand," Jour, of the S o i l Mech. and Found. Div., ASCE, V o l .
93, No. SM5, Proc. Paper 5451, pp. 169-190.
Lee, K.L. and Seed, H.B. (1970). ' "Undrained Strength of A n i s o t r o p i c a l l y
Consolidated Sand," Jour, of the S o i l Mech. and Found. Div., ASCE, V o l .
96, No. SM2, Proc. Paper 7136, pp. 411-428.
Lee, K.L. and Vernese, F . J . (1978). "End Restraint Effects on Cyclic
T r i a x i a l Strength of Sand," Jour, of the Geot. Engng. Div., ASCE, V o l .
104, No. GT6, P r o c Paper 13839, pp. 705-719.

212.
Lindenberg, J . and Koning, H.L. (1981). " C r i t i c a l Density of Sand,"
Geotechnique, V o l . 31, No. 2, pp. 231-245.
Luong, M.P. (1980). "Stress-Strain Aspects of Cohesionless Soils Under
C y c l i c and Transient Loading," I n t . Symp., Swansea, U.K.
Poulos, S.J. (1971). "The Stress-Strain Curves of S o i l s , " Geotechnical
Engineers Inc., Winchester, Mass., pp. 1-80.
Poulos, S.J. (1981). "The Steady State of Deformation," Jour, of the
Geot. Engng. Div., ASCE, V o l . 107, No. GT5, Proc. Paper 16241, pp. 553562.
Rowe, P.W. and Barden, L . (1964). "Importance of Free Ends i n T r i a x i a l
Testing," Jour, of the S o i l Mech. and Found. Div., ASCE, V o l . 90, No.
SMI, Proc. Paper 3753, pp. 1-27.
Sangrey, D.A. Castro, G., Poulos, S.J. and France, J.W. (1978). "Cyclic
Loadings of Sands, S i l t and Clays," P r o c , ASCE Specialty Conf. on
Earthquake Engng. and S o i l Dynamics, Pasadena, CA., V o l . 2, pp. 836-851.
Seed, H.B. (1979). " S o i l Liquefaction and Cyclic Mobility Evaluation for
Level Ground During Earthquakes," Jour, of the Geot. Engng. Div., ASCE,
V o l . 105, No. GT2, Proc. Paper 14380, pp. 201-255.
Seed, H.B. (1981). "Earthquake-Resistant Design of Earth Dams," I n t .
Conf. on Recent Advances i n Geot. Earthquake Engng. and S o i l Dynamics,
St. Louis, MO, V o l . 3, pp. 1157-1173.
Seed, H.B. and I d r i s s , I.M-. (1971). "Simplified Procedure for Evaluating
S o i l Liquefaction Potential," Jour, of the S o i l Mech. and Found. Div.,
ASCE, V o l . 97, No. SM9, Proc. Paper 8371, pp. 1249-1273.
Seed, H.B. and Lee, K.L. (1966). "Liquefaction of Saturated Sands During
C y c l i c Loading," Jour, of the Sol Mech. and Found Div., ASCE, Vol 92, No.
SM6, P r o c Paper 4972, pp. 105-134.
Seed, H.B. and Lee, K.L. (1969). "Pore Water Pressure i n Earth Slopes
Under Seismic Loading Conditions," Proc. 4th World Conf. on Earth.
Engng., Santiago, V o l . 3, A-5, pp. 1-11.
Seed, H.B., Lee, K.L., I d r i s s , I.M. and Makdisi, F . l . (1975). "The
Slides i n the San Fernando Dams During the Earthquake of February 9,
1971," Jour, of the Geot. Engng. Div., ASCE, V o l . 101, No. GT7, Proc.
Paper 11449, pp. 651-688.
Seed, H.B., Pyke, R. and Martin, G.R. (1975). "Analysis of the Effect of
M u l t i - D i r e c t i o n a l Shaking on the Liquefaction C h a r a c t e r i s t i c s of Sands,"
Report No. EERC 75-41, Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University
of C a l i f o r n i a , Berkeley, C a l i f o r n i a .
1

Vaid, Y.P. and Chern, J.C. (1983 ). "Effect of S t a t i c Shear on Resistance to Liquefaction," Soils and Foundations, V o l . 23, No. 1, pp.
47-60.

213.
2

Vaid, Y.P. and Chern, J.C. (1983 ). "Mechanism of Deformation During


Cyclic Undrained Loading of Saturated Sands," I n t . Jour, of S o i l Dynamics
and Earthquake Engng., V o l . 2, No. 3, pp. 171-177.
Vaid, Y.P., Chern, J.C. and Tumi, H. (1983). "Effect of Confining
Pressure and P a r t i c l e Angularity on Resistance to Liquefaction," Proc.
4th Canadian Conf. on Earthquake Engng., Vancouver, pp. 341-351.
Vaid, Y.P. and Finn, W.D.L. (1979). "Effect of Static Shear on
Liquefaction Potential," Jour, of the Geot. Engng. Div., ASCE, V o l . 105,
GT10, Proc. Paper 14909, pp. 1233-1246.
Yoshimi, Y. and Oh-Oka, H. (1975). "Influence of Degree of Shear Stress
Reversal on the Liquefaction Potential of Saturated Sand," S o i l s and
Foundations, V o l . 15, No. 3, pp. 27-40.

Vous aimerez peut-être aussi