Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Asst. Professor, Indore Institute of Science & Technology, Rau, Indore, Madhya Pradesh, India
2
Asst. Professor, Sardar Patel Institute of Technology, Andheri (W), Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
Abstract: Stabilization of black cotton soils with various additives has also attained lot of success and due to rapid industrialization
throughout the world; the production of huge quantity of produced waste materials creates not only the environmental problem but
also the disposal hazards. Many procedures have been developed to improve the mechanical properties of soil by incorporating a
wide range of stabilizing agents, additives. In this paper, an attempt had been made to utilize industrial wastes such as fly ash and
Nylon fibres as stabilizing agents. The effect of fly ash and Nylon fibres on certain properties of soil such as Liquid Limit, Plastic
Limit, Plasticity Index, Dry density, OMC, CBR (Soaked) of clayey soil had been studied. Study the effect of varying percentage of fly
ash (10%, 15%, 20% 25%, 30%,35%,40% ) and varying percentage of Nylon Fibre (0.25, 0.50, 0.75, 1, 1.25, 1.50) at varying aspect
ratios (20,40,60,80) on properties of Black Cotton Soil and then study the combined effect of varying percentage of optimum quantity
of fly ash and optimum quantity of Nylon fibre at various aspect ratio on properties of Black Cotton Soil. Results from various test
determine optimum percentage quantity of fly ash and optimum value of fibre aspect ratio and fibre content and also determine the
effect of optimum nylon fibre and fly ash on varying depth of sub grade. in soil with appropriate proportion improved strength
1. Introduction
Soil has been used as a construction material from time immortal.
Being poor in mechanical properties, it has been putting challenges
to civil engineers to improve its properties depending upon the
requirement which varies from site to site. The roads laid on
2. Distribution in India
The term soil stabilization means the improvement of the
stability or bearing power of a poor soil by the use of
controlled compaction; proportioning and the addition of
suitable admixtures or stabilizers. Soil stabilization deals
with mechanical, physico-chemical and chemical methods to
make the stabilized soil serve its purpose. The stabilization
process, essentially involve excavation of the in-situ soil,
treatment to the in-situ soil and compacting the treated
soil .As the stabilization process involve excavation of the
in-situ soil, this technique is ideal for improvement of soil in
shallow depths such as pavements .Methods of stabilization
may be grouped under two main types:
(a) modification or improvement of a soil property of the
existing soil without using any admixture and (b)
modification of the properties with the help of admixture.
The examples of the first type are compaction and drainage,
which improve the inherent shear strength of soil. The
examples of the second type are stabilization with
S. No.
Property
Range
1.
pH Value
>7( Alkaline)
2.
Organic Content
0.4 to 204 %
Specific Gravity
2.55
7.80
92.20
40.5
3
Maximum Dry Density (gm/cm )
O.M.C. (%)
1.57
71.20
30.50
40.70
CBR (%)
1.71 (Soaked)
IS Classification
CH
18
6.3. Compaction
5.2. Swelling
A structure built in a dry season, when the natural water
content is low shows differential movement as result of soils
during subsequent wet season. This causes structures
supported by such swelling soils to lift up and crack.
Restriction on having developed swelling pressures making
the structure suitable.
5.3. Shrinkage
A structure built at the end of the wet season when the
natural water content is high, shows settlement and shrinkage
cracks during subsequent dry season.
w
The range of specific gravity of coal ashes varies from 1.46
to 2.66 the low values of specific gravity is because of
hollow particles chemosphere the sp. Gr. Of soil solids is
determined by
1. 50 ml density bottle or
2. A 500 ml flask or
3. A pycnometer
The density bottle method is most accurate and is suitable for
all types of soil the flask or pycnometer method is suitable
for coarse grained soil.
The water content at which the soil changes from one state to
other state are known as consistency limits or Atterbergs
limit .The Atterbergs limit which are useful for engineering
www.ijsr.net
Licensed Under Creative Commons Attribution CC BY
2091
8. Stabilization
Lime stabilization helps in increasing the strength, durability
and also minimizes the moisture variations in the soil and
lime must be well compacted for obtaining sufficient strength
and durability by maintaining OMC and the same assumption
is made in the experimental determination of the required
lime proportion. Quality of lime to be added depends upon
the specific surface area of soil particles and it is more for
fine grained soils even up to 15 % by weight of soil. The
stabilization of black cotton soil with lime has been done in
three different ratios of lime i.e. 0%, 4% and 6%. After the
stabilization of soil with lime in above percentage the various
tests have been performed
8.1. Liquid Limit Tests
The liquid limit of a soil is the moisture content, expressed as
a percentage of the weight of the oven-dried soil, at the
boundary between the liquid and plastic states of consistency.
The moisture content at this boundary is arbitrarily defined as
the water content at which two halves of a soil cake will flow
together, for a distance of in. (12.7 mm) along the bottom
of a groove of standard dimensions separating the two
halves, when the cup of a standard liquid limit apparatus is
dropped 25 times from a height of 0.3937 in. (10 mm) at the
rate of two drops/second.
www.ijsr.net
Licensed Under Creative Commons Attribution CC BY
2092
Composition
B. C. Soil + 0% Lime
B. C. Soil + 4% Lime
B. C. Soil + 6% Lime
Plastic Limit
31%
Non-Plastic
Non-Plastic
Composition
1.
2.
3.
B. C. Soil + 0% Lime
B. C. Soil + 4% Lime
B. C. Soil + 6% Lime
Plasticity Index
PI = LL - PL
15.3%
-
9. Results
S.
No.
1.
2.
B.C. Soil + 0%
Lime
Water
No. of
(%)
Blows
44
60
46
27
48
15
L. L. is 46.3%
B. C. Soil + 4%
Lime
Water
No. of
(%)
Blows
40
30
42
18
44
12
L. L. is 40.7 %
B. C. Soil + 6%
Soil
Water
No. of
(%)
Blows
35
40
37
35
40
17
L. L. is 38.1%
Determination
No.
Mass of mould +
compacted soil
W(gms)
Mass of
compacted soil
W3 = W2-W1
(gms)
Wet density
wt
t
v
3.
4.
5.
Moisture content
(%)
Dry density
d
1 W
(gm/cm
B.C. Soil
+ 0%
Lime
B.C. Soil
+ 4%
Lime
B.C. Soil
+ 6%
Lime
6993
7263
7202
1807
1743
1682
1.81
1.74
1.68
14
14
12
1.58
1.53
1.50
Samples
B. C. Soil + 0% Lime
B. C. Soil + 4% Lime
B. C. Soil + 6% Lime
C. B. R. Values
1.9
11.2
15.2
www.ijsr.net
Licensed Under Creative Commons Attribution CC BY
2093
[3]
[4]
[5]
[6]
[7]
Figure 6: Load vs. Penetration Chart
[8]
Samples
B. C. Soil + 0% Lime
B. C. Soil + 4% Lime
B. C. Soil + 6% Lime
Swelling Pressure
0.56
0.386
0.1
10. Conclusions
[10]
References
[1]
[11]
[12]
[13]
[14]
[15]
Authors Profile
Shailendra Singh received
the
Bachelors
of
Engineering from Madhav Institute of Technology &
Science, Gwalior and Masters of Engineering degrees in Civil
Engineering from Shri. G. S. Institute of Technology &
Science, Indore. His Masters is in Structural Engineering and
major research areas are Elasto-Plastic
analysis, Finite Element Method, Geo-Technology, Concrete
Technology, Seismic analysis, etc.
[9]
Strength
Properties
of
Geo-grid-Reinforced
Construction and Demolition Materials using a
Modified Large Scale Direct Shear Testing Apparatus
www.ijsr.net
Licensed Under Creative Commons Attribution CC BY
2094