Vous êtes sur la page 1sur 7

Quality Report

Generated with Pro version 2.2.25

Important: Click on the different icons for:


Help to analyze the results in the Quality Report
Additional information about the sections

Click here for additional tips to analyze the Quality Report

Summary
Project
Processed
Camera Model Name(s)
Average Ground Sampling Distance (GSD)

demo barrick
2016-09-18 11:41:22
FC350_3.6_4000x3000 (RGB)
5.75 cm / 2.26 in

Area Covered

0.3652 km2 / 36.5214 ha / 0.1411 sq. mi. / 90.2931 acres


13m:48s

Time for Initial Processing (without report)

Quality Check

Images

median of 40709 keypoints per image

Dataset

152 out of 159 images calibrated (95%), all images enabled

Camera Optimization

1.95% relative difference between initial and optimized internal camera parameters

Matching

median of 21056.6 matches per calibrated image

Georeferencing

yes, no 3D GCP

Preview

Figure 1: Orthomosaic and the corresponding sparse Digital Surface Model (DSM) before densification.

Calibration Details
Number of Calibrated Images
Number of Geolocated Images

Initial Image Positions

152 out of 159


159 out of 159

Figure 2: Top view of the initial image position. The green line follows the position of the images in time starting from the large blue dot.

Computed Image/GCPs/Manual Tie Points Positions

Uncertainty ellipses 10x magnified


Figure 3: Offset between initial (blue dots) and computed (green dots) image positions as well as the offset between the GCPs initial positions (blue crosses) and
their computed positions (green crosses) in the top-view (XY plane), front-view (XZ plane), and side-view (YZ plane). Red dots indicate disabled or uncalibrated
images. Dark green ellipses indicate the absolute position uncertainty of the bundle block adjustment result.

Absolute camera position and orientation uncertainties

Mean
Sigma

Overlap

X [m]
0.453
0.090

Y [m]
0.453
0.090

Z [m]
1.106
0.267

Omega [degree]
0.274
0.044

Phi [degree]
0.333
0.037

Kappa [degree]
0.095
0.002

Number of overlapping images: 1

5+

Figure 4: Number of overlapping images computed for each pixel of the orthomosaic.
Red and yellow areas indicate low overlap for which poor results may be generated. Green areas indicate an overlap of over 5 images for every pixel. Good
quality results will be generated as long as the number of keypoint matches is also sufficient for these areas (see Figure 5 for keypoint matches).

Bundle Block Adjustment Details


Number of 2D Keypoint Observations for Bundle Block Adjustment
Number of 3D Points for Bundle Block Adjustment
Mean Reprojection Error [pixels]

3091068
907163
0.185

Internal Camera Parameters


FC350_3.6_4000x3000 (RGB). Sensor Dimensions: 6.170 [mm] x 4.628 [mm]
EXIF ID: FC350_3.6_4000x3000

Initial Values
Optimized Values
Uncertainties (Sigma)

Focal
Length
2302.347 [pixel]
3.551 [mm]
2347.248 [pixel]
3.621 [mm]
2.507 [pixel]
0.004 [mm]

Principal
Point x
2000.000 [pixel]
3.085 [mm]
1996.049 [pixel]
3.079 [mm]
0.203 [pixel]
0.000 [mm]

Principal
Point y
1500.000 [pixel]
2.314 [mm]
1481.408 [pixel]
2.285 [mm]
0.312 [pixel]
0.000 [mm]

R1

R2

R3

T1

T2

-0.130

0.106

-0.016

-0.000

0.000

-0.135

0.109

-0.014

0.000

0.000

0.000

0.001

0.000

0.000

0.000

The number of Automatic Tie Points (ATPs) per pixel averaged over all images of the camera model
is color coded between black and white. White indicates that, in average, more than 16 ATPs are
extracted at this pixel location. Black indicates that, in average, 0 ATP has been extracted at this pixel
location. Click on the image to the see the average direction and magnitude of the reprojection error
for each pixel. Note that the vectors are scaled for better visualization.

2D Keypoints Table

Median
Min
Max
Mean

Number of 2D Keypoints per Image


40709
23451
61920
41226

3D Points from 2D Keypoint Matches

Number of Matched 2D Keypoints per Image


21057
2115
34870
20336

In 2 Images
In 3 Images
In 4 Images
In 5 Images
In 6 Images
In 7 Images
In 8 Images
In 9 Images
In 10 Images
In 11 Images
In 12 Images
In 13 Images
In 14 Images
In 15 Images
In 16 Images
In 17 Images
In 18 Images
In 19 Images
In 20 Images
In 21 Images
In 22 Images
In 23 Images
In 24 Images
In 25 Images
In 26 Images
In 27 Images
In 28 Images
In 29 Images
In 30 Images
In 31 Images
In 32 Images
In 33 Images
In 34 Images
In 35 Images
In 36 Images
In 37 Images
In 38 Images
In 39 Images
In 40 Images

2D Keypoint Matches

Number of 3D Points Observed


558623
144746
63800
35931
22036
16110
12108
9056
7433
5813
4799
4121
3410
2912
2499
2107
1781
1598
1377
1149
965
831
703
605
487
413
330
276
258
187
184
171
116
99
66
33
17
8
5

Uncertainty ellipses 500x magnified


Number of matches

25 222 444 666 888 1111 1333 1555 1777 2000


Figure 5: Computed image positions with links between matched images. The darkness of the links indicates the number of matched 2D keypoints between the
images. Bright links indicate weak links and require manual tie points or more images. Dark green ellipses indicate the relative camera position uncertainty of the
bundle block adjustment result.

Relative camera position and orientation uncertainties

Mean
Sigma

X [m]
0.035
0.007

Y [m]
0.035
0.007

Z [m]
0.059
0.036

Omega [degree]
0.034
0.018

Phi [degree]
0.029
0.016

Kappa [degree]
0.008
0.004

Geolocation Details
Absolute Geolocation Variance
Min Error [m]
-15.00
-12.00
-9.00
-6.00
-3.00
0.00
3.00
6.00

Max Error [m]


-15.00
-12.00
-9.00
-6.00
-3.00
0.00
3.00
6.00
9.00

Geolocation Error X [%]


0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
1.97
44.08
51.97
1.97
0.00

Geolocation Error Y [%]


0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
5.92
44.08
41.45
8.55
0.00

Geolocation Error Z [%]


0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
53.29
46.71
0.00
0.00

9.00
12.00
15.00
Mean [m]
Sigma [m]
RMS Error [m]

12.00
15.00
-

0.00
0.00
0.00
-0.000000
1.431980
1.431980

0.00
0.00
0.00
0.000000
2.083125
2.083125

0.00
0.00
0.00
0.000000
1.239481
1.239481

Min Error and Max Error represent geolocation error intervalsbetween -1.5 and 1.5 times the maximum accuracy of all the images. Columns X, Y, Z show the
percentage of images with geolocation errors within the predefined error intervals. The geolocation error is the difference between the intial and computed image
positions. Note that the image geolocation errors do not correspond to the accuracy of the observed 3D points.

Relative Geolocation Variance


Relative Geolocation Error
[-1.00, 1.00]
[-2.00, 2.00]
[-3.00, 3.00]
Mean of Geolocation Accuracy [m]
Sigma of Geolocation Accuracy [m]

Images X [%]
100.00
100.00
100.00
5.000000
0.000000

Images Y [%]
99.34
100.00
100.00
5.000000
0.000000

Images Z [%]
100.00
100.00
100.00
10.000000
0.000000

Images X, Y, Z represent the percentage of images with a relative geolocation error in X, Y, Z.

Geolocation Orientational Variance


Omega
Phi
Kappa

RMS [degree]
3.139
2.996
2.700

Geolocation RMS error of the orientation angles given by the difference between the initial and computed image orientation angles.

Initial Processing Details


System Information

Hardware
Operating System

CPU: Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-6700 CPU @ 3.40GHz


RAM: 16GB
GPU: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 (Driver: 10.18.13.6510)
Windows 10 Enterprise, 64-bit

Coordinate Systems
Image Coordinate System
Output Coordinate System

WGS84 (egm96)
WGS84 / UTM zone 19S (egm96)

Processing Options
Detected Template
Keypoints Image Scale
Advanced: Matching Image Pairs
Advanced: Matching Strategy
Advanced: Keypoint Extraction
Advanced: Calibration

No Template Available
Full, Image Scale: 1
Aerial Grid or Corridor
Use Geometrically Verified Matching: no
Targeted Number of Keypoints: Automatic
Calibration Method: Standard
Internal Parameters Optimization: All
External Parameters Optimization: All
Rematch: Auto, yes

Point Cloud Densification details

Processing Options
Image Scale
Point Density
Minimum Number of Matches
3D Textured Mesh Generation
3D Textured Mesh Settings:
Advanced: 3D Textured Mesh Settings
Advanced: Matching Window Size
Advanced: Image Groups
Advanced: Use Processing Area
Advanced: Use Annotations
Advanced: Limit Camera Depth Automatically
Time for Point Cloud Densification
Time for 3D Textured Mesh Generation

multiscale, 1/2 (Half image size, Default)


Optimal
3
yes
Resolution: High Resolution
Color Balancing: yes
Sample Density Divider: 1
Maximum Number of Triangles per Leaf: 8
7x7 pixels
group1
yes
yes
no
26m:09s
13m:16s

Results
Number of Generated Tiles
Number of 3D Densified Points

1
11852864

Average Density (per m3)

23.52

DSM, Orthomosaic and Index Details


Processing Options
DSM and Orthomosaic Resolution
DSM Filters
Raster DSM

Orthomosaic
Grid DSM

Contour Lines Generation

Index Calculator: Reflectance Map


Index Calculator: Indices
Index Calculator: Index Values
Time for DSM Generation
Time for Orthomosaic Generation
Time for Contour Lines Generation
Time for Reflectance Map Generation
Time for Index Map Generation

1 x GSD (5.76 [cm/pixel])


Noise Filtering: yes
Surface Smoothing: yes, Type: Sharp
Generated: yes
Method: Inverse Distance Weighting
Merge Tiles: yes
Generated: yes
Merge Tiles: yes
GeoTIFF Without Transparency: yes
Google Maps Tiles and KML: yes
Generated: yes, Spacing [cm]: 100
Generated: yes
Contour Base [m]: 0
Elevation Interval [m]: 10
Resolution [cm]: 100
Minimum Line Size [vertices]: 20
Generated: yes
Resolution: 1 x GSD (5.76 [cm/pixel])
Merge Tiles: yes
red, green, blue, grayscale
Point Shapefile Grid Size [cm/grid]: 200
Polygon Shapefile [cm/grid]: 400
23m:59s
20m:31s
10s
47m:06s
08m:18s

Vous aimerez peut-être aussi