Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Department
of
Chemical Engineering
ChE 403
H2- Tray Drying Experiment Report
Group 11
Alperen Aydn 05120000181
Ahmet Aydemir 05120000163
Berkay Er 05120000132
Serbay Emir 05130000122
Submitted to:
Res.Assist.Dr.
Tlay MADENOLU
Bornova, 2016
SUMMARY
In this Tray Drying Experiment, the drying curves, critical and equilibrium points were
investigated by experimental and theoretical approach.
The results on the experimental part were very convenient and the plots and the values
obtained from numerical and curve fitting methods were matched. As a first look at the X
calculations with the data collected during the experiments we can say that 60th and 80th minutes
the critical point were reached as about between 1 and 1.5 kgW/kgDry. The curve fitting and
numerical derivation methods also confirm that guess as 79th minute.
However the results on the theoretical part were obtained very different than the
experimental results with about 80 % error. The calculation of N gave 0.377 where is 0.065-0.074
in the experimental calculation results.
Those results, calculations and also the conclusion and discussion are given in the report
and also the errors and suggestions are given in the discussion section.
Table of Contents
AIM ......................................................................................................................................................... 1
RESULTS .................................................................................................................................................. 2
DISCUSSION............................................................................................................................................. 7
NOMENCLATURE ..................................................................................................................................... 9
REFERENCES .......................................................................................................................................... 11
APPENDIX .............................................................................................................................................. 12
CALCULATION OF THE MOISTURE CONTENT ON DRY BASIS ............................................................... 12
DETERMINATION OF CRITICAL TIME .................................................................................................. 12
From Graph ................................................................................................................................... 12
By Using Curve Fitting Method ....................................................................................................... 12
CALCULATION OF THE RATE OF DRYING (EXPERIMENTAL) ................................................................. 14
1)
2)
List of Tables
Table 1. Experimental Results..
Table 2. Moisture content..
Table 3. Experimental rate of drying results..
Table 4. Calculated X values over time. Numerical Derivative Results X and Calculated N values.
Table 5. Given data about experimental setup.
Table 6. Theoretical Results
2
3
4
5
6
6
List of Figures
Figure 1. Experimental Moisture content graph respect to time and trendline equations....
Figure 2. Drying rate respect to moisture content
Figure 3. X versus N plot from data obtained by Numerical Derivation
3
4
5
AIM
This experiment report aims to investigate the characteristic of drying curves, critical
and equilibrium moisture values of a wet sawdust sample and the parameters which are
effecting them.
RESULTS
Table 1: Experimental Results.
Time
(min)
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
55
60
65
70
75
80
85
90
95
100
105
110
115
120
Mt (g)
Mw+t (g)
Md+t (g)
P (mmWH)
Tv,in (C)
Tv,out (C)
RH %
105
105
105
105
105
105
105
105
105
105
105
105
105
105
105
105
105
105
105
105
105
105
105
105
105
144.53
143.20
141.50
139.90
138.10
136.00
133.92
131.90
129.81
127.80
125.86
124.05
122.08
120.31
118.73
117.30
115.90
114.82
113.86
113.28
112.78
112.11
111.74
111.30
111.00
110.95
110.95
110.95
110.95
110.95
110.95
110.95
110.95
110.95
110.95
110.95
110.95
110.95
110.95
110.95
110.95
110.95
110.95
110.95
110.95
110.95
110.95
110.95
110.95
110.95
124
135
138
138
138
138
138
105
107
105
107
106
105
105
105
105
105
109
105
105
105
105
105
105
105
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
87
82
85
85
85
85
85
85
85
85
85
85
85
81
86
85
85
84
84
84
84
84
84
84
85
27.1
28.6
28.4
29.4
29.7
29.8
29.8
29.7
29.8
30.1
30.5
30.6
30.7
30.9
30.9
30.5
30.6
30.7
30.3
30.6
30.6
30.6
30.1
30.1
30.1
N
0.065
0.065
0.065
0.065
0.065
0.065
0.065
0.065
0.065
0.065
0.065
0.065
0.065
0.065
0.065
0.065
0.052
0.047
0.043
0.038
0.033
0.028
0.024
0.019
0.014
i (step)
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
Time (min)
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
55
60
65
70
75
80
85
90
95
100
105
110
115
120
X(t)
5.6437
5.4202
5.1345
4.8655
4.563
4.2101
3.8605
3.521
3.1697
2.8319
2.5059
2.2017
1.8706
1.5731
1.3076
1.0672
0.8319
0.6504
0.4891
0.3916
0.3076
0.195
0.1328
0.0588
0.0084
X'(t)
-0.0447
-0.0509
-0.0519
-0.054
-0.0573
-0.0594
-0.0606
-0.0618
-0.0625
-0.0628
-0.0626
-0.0629
-0.0626
-0.0619
-0.061
-0.0601
-0.0587
-0.0573
-0.0553
-0.0534
-0.0519
-0.0501
-0.0486
-0.047
-0.0101
N
0.0529
0.0603
0.0614
0.064
0.0679
0.0704
0.0718
0.0732
0.074
0.0743
0.0741
0.0744
0.0741
0.0733
0.0722
0.0712
0.0695
0.0678
0.0654
0.0632
0.0614
0.0593
0.0575
0.0556
0.0119
63
27
0.33
8
46.8
Re initial
3000
30000
45000
Orifice coeff. Co
0.64
0.61
0.60
Re final
50847
48646
47669
Nc theoretical
0.377
DISCUSSION
In the first section of calculations the moisture content on the dry basis X were
calculated over time from the collected experimental data which is given in results section table
1 and the results as on table 2 are plotted as shown in figure 1.
The plot is visually convenient with the expectation of linear decrease of X over time
until the critical point XC and parabolic decrease after that point through the equilibrium point
XE. By using the visual guess the line on the plot were divided into two sections which are
before and after the critical point XC. And by using the Excel Trendlines, the line before the
critical point is modelled as a linear and negative slope equation which has a great R2 value of
0.9985.
The line after the critical point is selected to be a second order polynomial model
because, on the second plot the figure 2 which is X (moisture content) vs N (drying rate), is the
derivative of the first one and also the line between critical and equilibrium points on the
second plot can be assumed as a linear line so using a second order equation makes sense also
the R2 value is 0.9967 which is very well for this model. Critical drying rate was found as 0.065
kgW/ time*area.
To confirm the estimation on the critical value of X, those two equations were
intersected and the results are saying that XC is around the time 79 minutes which was
expected to be between 75 and 80 minutes when we look at the results on table 3.
The calculation via numerical derivation was also found similar to the experimental
results as shown on table 4 and figure 3. The critical point or in other words the linear tendency
end of N over X is slightly out of linearity according to the figure 3 but in general the profile is as
expected. Critical drying rate was calculated as 0.074 kgW/time*area.
The theoretical results on table 6 were obtained after 3 Re number guess or iterations.
The drying rate at the critical time was found as 0.377 kgW/time*area which has a large error
about over 80 %.
The differences on the results of this experiment can be explained as follows.
-There might be experimental set-up maintenance lack which results false
measurements or problems with the working.
-The might be human sources errors on the measurements.
-The environmental changes like temperature, wind and humidity might effected the
measurements or the results.
NOMENCLATURE
m = Air flow rate (kg /s)
C o = Orifice meter correction coefficient
= Density of the air before entering the dryer (kg /m 3 )
=Viscosity of air before entering the dryer (kg / ms)
P = Pressure drop in orifice meter ( mmWH )
D o = Orifice diameter (mm)
D i = Pipe diameter (mm)
= Latent heat of vaporization (kj / kg )
h V = Heat transfer coefficient of the air (W/m 2 K )
G V = Mass flux of the air (kg / m 2 s )
RH = Relative Humidity
N c = Critical Drying rate (g water vaporized / m 2 min)
N = Drying rate (g water vaporized / m 2 min)
Mt = Weight of one petry (g)
Ti = wet bulb temperature of air ( oC )
Tv = Dry bulb temperature of air ( oC )
Tv,in = Inlet temperature of air (oC )
Tv,out = Outlet temperature of air ( oC )
(MW+T ) = Amount of wet sample (g)
(MD+T ) = Amount of dried sample (g)
X = Moisture content on dry basis (g moisture /g dry solid )
9
10
REFERENCES
1-Perry and Chilton, Chemical Engineering Handbook 5 th Ed. 5-13, McGraw Hill Book Co.,1973
2-Elementary Principles of Chemical Processes 3 rd Ed. Wiley.
3-EngieeringToolBox.com
11
APPENDIX
CALCULATION OF THE MOISTURE CONTENT ON DRY BASIS
M W T t t M DT t
M DT t M T
At t = 0 min;
144.53110.95
110.95105
[
[
= .. ]
12
1
1 0
= [ 1 ] = [1 ]
1
1 80
1
= [
0
1 1
]
. . 80
X
5.644
= [] = [ ]
X
0.832
( )1 ( ) =
b
( F T F )1 ( F T F ) ( F T F )1 ( F T X )
a
b 5.7317
a 0.0630
y=-0.0630x+5.7317
Falling Rate Period:
y= ex2+dx+c so; x=e 2+d +c
F .
.
C
C 1
C2 1
g2
C2
xc
.
e
F T F d F T .
c
.
xF
13
( F T F ) 1 ( F T F ) I
c
( F F ) ( F F ) d ( F T F ) 1 ( F T X )
e
T
e 0.0003
d 0.0699
c 4.7462
y= 0.0003x2-0.0699x+4.7462
W dX
A d
W M D T M T 5.95g 0.0059g
Di 8cm 8 10 2 m
Ai
D2
4
(8 102 ) 2
4
0.005m 2
y=-0.0630x+5.7317
x=-0.0630 +5.7317
(0.0630 + 5.7317)
=
= 0.0630
=
=
(0.0630)
0.0059
(0.0630) = 0.07434
0.005
14
y= 0.0003x2-0.0699x+4.7462
x= 0.00032-0.0699+4.7462
2
(0.0006 0.0699)
At 80 min. :
0.0059
(0.0006 (80) 0.0699) = 0.0258
0.005
+1 0
5.4202 5.6437
=> 1 =
= 0.0447
+1 0
50
Where i is the calculation or measurement step, X 0 is the initial moisture content, t 0 is the
beginning of the experiment time zero and X i+1 and ti+1 are each step after initial measurement and
calculations.
From the equation 1 in the textbook N is calculated as follows.
=
0.00595
(0.0447) = 0.0529
=> 1 =
0.00502
The rest of the calculation results are given in the table in the results section.
15
1 D
/ Di
Ao
(27 103 ) 2
4
5.73 10 m
air = 1.725*10-5
Do 27mm 27 103 m
Do2
Re Assumption :
Re =
0.428
D 63 10 3 m
1 0.428
4
Re1 =
4(0.0186)
0.027
m = 0.0186 kg/s
17
m = 0.0186 kg/s
A = area of petri
NC =
hv
hv = 14.3*(Gv)0.8
(TV T)ln
Gv =
= 0.0186
0.005024
3.7 kg/(m2.s)
= 2257 kj/kg
for Ti;
at % 27 Relative Humidity
NC =
ln ( )
40.75
2257
951
ln(
95
)
1
= 20.86
*(20.86) = 0.377
18
Ti = 1 oC
0.3770.07434
0.377
* 100
= % 80.28
19
* 100