Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
ARTICLES
Nordic Journal of Music Therapy, 10(2), pp. 144-158.
Does music induce emotion in the listener or do we project emotion to music? It is the latter
opinion that is supported most frequently in music psychology research. Various studies
demonstrate that a variety of physiological and psychological changes occur when listening to
music, although it is not yet clear how these changes are brought about, related directly to
musical qualities. The question how music influences the listener is of importance to music
therapy. Music therapy and music psychology generally function as separate disciplines. In this
review article it is proposed that music therapy and music psychology can benefit from each
other's work in a living-apart-together
relationship.
Keywords: emotion - music - music psychology - music therapy - research
Introduction
'Ladies and Gentlemen, my respected and beloved
music friends! Musica animae levamen, music is
medicine for our souls.' These are the opening lines
of the book 'Die musikalische Hausapotheke/The
musical home medicine cabinet' written by the
German musicologist Christopher Rueger(1991). In
this work, Rueger describes a variety of musical
recipes to cure an equally impressive variety of
disorders. If we take a closer look into his laboratory,
we can read that listening to Beethoven's Symphony
No.2 helps to cope with feelings of depression and
doubt. The popular Goldberg Variations of Bach will
decrease sleeping disorders.
If it could only be so simple. For many lay people,
these descriptions are their idea of what music
therapy is all about. Many people have read about
the 'Mozart Effect' and a music therapist is often
pictured in non-medical journals as being an
equivalent of 'a healthcare deejay'. There are,
however, many disciplines involved in the study of
the effects of music on the listener. It is the music
psychologist who looks at effects of music in the
general listener, e.g. what emotions can be induced
by music in the listener? Cognitive theory studies
how music is perceived and how cognitive schemata
144
ANNEMIEK.VINK
&deVries, 1995).
Within the music psychology research literature,
Mandler's (1984) and Berlyne's (1971) cognitive
theories of emotion are occasionally referred to.
Mandler holds arousal as a prerequisite for the
experience of emotion, but sees arousal in essence
as of minor importance. Mandler attaches the more
value to the cognitive appraisal of bodily
experiences. Emotions, in line with Meyer (1956).
are caused by interruptions of expectations about
future events. The interruption, depending on the
personal involvement, causes arousal for which an
explanation is sought. Information processing is
important for the experience of emotions. The
experience of arousal is a result of a 'mis-match'
between existing knowledge structures and the
integration of new information. This thought
'matches' Meyer's idea, who states that as a result
of unexpected musical changes, arousal is
experienced. According to Mandler, negative
emotions will be the result of an extreme mismatch
between musical information and existent musical
schemata. Accordingly, positive emotions are
experienced when musical information matches
existing cognitive schemata.
A comparable emotion theory is from Berlyne
(1971). He hypothesized that when we listen to
music, we take into account factors such as the
complexity, familiarity and novelty of the music. The
degree to which the music sounds familiar
determines if the music is experienced as pleasurable
or uncomfortable. The hedonic value is low when
the music is entirely new to the listener, and
progresses with increasing familiarity and will
decrease again when the music is totally known.
This process can be described with a reversed Ucurve. According to Berlyne the experience of
arousal is an important factor in the experience of
emotion, equal to Mandler. But he goes further, he
states that it is the listener's intention to experience
arousal while listening to music. Musical preference
is based on the preference to maintain the level of
preferred arousal constant. The more complex the
music, the more arousal will be experienced. The
listener seeks activation, but to a certain extent.
When the maximum is achieved he will avoid further
activation. In a listener with more elaborate music
knowledge structures, arousal will be less when
ANNEMIEKVINK
de Vries; 1995) false is also the expectation that
musical parameters can be manipulated in a totally
independent manner. They mention as an example,
the manipulation of tempo. A piece cannot be simply
played twice as fast. Also temporal relations between
the notes accordingly need to be adjusted in order
to let the music still sound natural. Still, with great
consistency, it has been shown that musical
characteristics, such as the mode, rhythm and tempo,
are perceived by the listener to be expressive of
emotion (for an overview of this topic see
Gabrielson & Lindstrom; 2001).
In most of the music psychology research
studies, only classical music is studied. In the music
therapy literature we can read that listener's
preferences range from heavy metal to classical
music. Also in the context where musical emotions
with children are studied, mostly classical music has
been used as test material. The generalisability of
the results, when only studying classical music, is
therefore small. Still, there are reasons why
researchers prefer classical music, as classical music
is mostly not accompanied by sung lyrics, which is
the case for most of the popular music repertoire.
For the earlier researchers, there were also interesting
ethical reasons. Wing (1968) described that while
developing his musical ability test:
"Jazz music was not included, as this would be
unlikely to yield examples of really good harmony,
would be likely to prejudice the authorities against
the test, and would waste the children's time if they
were listening to poor music" (Wing, 1968, p.37).
In more contemporary research studies, also
popular music, jazz or religious music has been
included. This is an important development for music
psychology findings to be generalised to music
therapy practice.
Regardless of the above-mentioned
methodological problems, it is the common research
outcome that listeners in general can describe with
great accuracy which emotional expression is
communicated. But of interest also for music therapy
is whether these findings can be related to the
experience in the listener. Which emotions or
reactions are exactly induced in the listener through
music? Various research studies have tried to answer
this question with a variety of physiological and
cognitive listening tests.
Nordic Journal of Music Therapy, 2001, 10(2)
ANNEMIEKVINK
can be measured.
To conclude, music does bring about
physiological changes although it is not yet clear
how these changes are related to musical
characteristics. Clear outcomes in this context are
of value for music therapy. If music produces
physiological and psychological effects in healthy
persons as listeners, then it may be assumed that
people with known diseases respond in specific ways
(Aldridge, 1996). If music is known to influence a
physiological parameter such as the heart rate or
blood pressure then Aldridge argues music can be
used therapeutically for patients who have problems
with heart disease and hypertension. These are
interrelations from which both disciplines can
benefit.
% Listening
1998
% Playing
1998
% Listening
1999
% Playing
1999
Sadness
90
80
63.6
Joy
100
100
100
%Listening
2001
%Playing
2001
% Listening
2000
% Playing
2000
72,2
33,3
55,6
100
88.9
72,2
88,9
100
88,9
88.9
Liking
40
40
36,4
36,4
77.8
77,8
44,4
44,4
Appreciation
70
60
81,8
54,5
77.8
22,2
55,6
55,6
Dislike
90
60
63,6
45.5
55,6
22,2
88,9
44.4
Satisfaction
60
100
63,6
90.9
22,8
77,8
55,6
100
Suspense
80
60
45.5
27,3
22.2
88,9
100
77,8
Hope
60
50
45.5
54,5
55,6
77,8
66,7
55,6
Anger
40
50
54,5
81,8
44.4
55,6
55,6
66,7
Hopelessness
40
40
9.1
45,5
33,3
33,3
55,6
33,3
Disappointment
30
60
27,3
54,5
66,7
44,4
55,6
44,4
Pride
50
70
63,6
63.6
33,3
44,4
44,4
66.7
Relief
80
60
18,2
63,6
33,3
100
66,7
66,7
Sympathy
30
50
63,6
63.6
88,9
33,3
88,9
33,3
Happiness for
80
50
63,6
36,4
88,9
88,9
55,6
77,8
Resignation
70
40
27,3
27.3
66.7
44,4
77,8
44,4
Fear
50
50
45,5
18,2
33,3
44,4
33,3
44,4
Remorse
20
10
36,4
18,2
22,2
44,4
44.4
44,4
66,7
Gratitude
70
40
54,5
27,3
55.6
44,4
88,9
Resentment
40
40
18,2
27,3
22,2
44,4
66,7
33,3
Serf-satisfaction
40
80
27,3
18,2
22.2
22,2
11.1
33,3
Fears confirmed
30
30
54,5
15,2
33,3
22,2
77,8
33,3
Shame
10
30
18,2
27,3
33.3
22,2
22,2
33,3
Reproach
10
9.1
22,2
22,2
33,3
11,1
Gloating
20
10
36,4
18.2
11.1
22,2
33,3
n-10
n-10
n-11
n-11
n-9
n-9
n-9
n-9
Table 1: The experience of emotions on the Ortony, Clore and Collins scale (1988) by music
therapy students experienced when listening to music and performing music.
on few occasions by music psychology researchers descriptions. First, people tended to use music as a
in the context of music appraisal. Sloboda (1992) 'change agent' to alter their mood state (n-41). This
asked adults to recall any memories from the first was reported through statements such as 'music
ten years of their lives that involved music in any relaxes me, when I am tense and anxious' and 'music
way. It was not asked specifically whether there was motivates and inspires me to be a better person'.
an emotional association with the music, just what Secondly, people reported that music was used as a
musical experiences one recalled from childhood. method of catharsis to promote the intensification
From the free descriptions, it was determined that in or release of already existent emotions (n-34). Example
39% of the cases emotion was indeed a classifying statements included 'music releases emotions' and
characteristic. Also on adult age, emotion was an 'music helps me discover what I am actually feeling'.
important factor in the free descriptions of music Sloboda states that the common factor to all examples
experiences. Sloboda (1992) let 67 regular music was that music does not create emotion, but rather
listeners describe in their own words, the nature of it allows a person access to the experience of
their most valued emotional experience to music. emotions that are already 'on the agenda'. A
Two dominant themes emerged in the spontaneous statement, all music therapists will recognize.
Nordic Journal of Music Therapy, 2001, 10(2)
ANNEMEKVINK
ANNEMIEKVINK
Coda
Far-reaching conclusions cannot be made about the
relationship and the direction of the relationship
between music and emotion. There are still too many
methodological and theoretical problems to be able
lo clearly describe this relation, both in music
psychology and music therapy. Ruud (2001)
describes that one should think that the music
therapist would be the first to know why music is so
effective in music therapy. How difficult it is to
describe this and to demonstrate this scientifically
has been shown in this paper. As there are so many
aspects still unknown, possibly a strong partner
can assist in finding new answers: both for music
psychology and for music therapy.
In this article some findings of music psychology
and music therapy research studies were discussed
which share the same topic: music and emotion. The
paper is certainly full of blanks, as this is a topic that
deserves a book (series:), but possibly it stimulates
discussion to fill in the blanks.
Still, the fields of music psychology and music
therapy are relatively young and it is only since
recent dates that the relation between emotion and
music is researched more thoroughly. Sloboda and
Juslin (2001) state that after a period of neglect,
because of the listed methodological problems, the
topic of music and emotion is again at the forefront
of music psychology. They illustrate this with the
sudden increase in music and emotion papers at
various conferences.
According to Sloboda (1985) it is important to
integrate existing knowledge from a variety of
disciplines to be able to further theoretical
development. He also mentions aptly the tendency
that researchers want to come up with a theory of
their own. Mostly this complicates integrating
findings. Luckily, more and more people build their
ideas upon already existing knowledge. Ansdell
(2001) sums some of the recent trends in musicology
which he sees as of importance for music therapy
Nordic Journal of Music Therapy, 2001, 10(2)
ANNEMIEKVINK
such as the study of music as a process as well as a Bunt, Leslie & Pavlicevic, Mercedes (2001). Music
structure. The latest European Music Therapy
and emotion: perspectives from music therapy.
conference in Naples in 2001 included musicology
In: Sloboda, J.A & Juslin, P.N. (Eds.) Music and
presentations that demonstrated the interrelations
Emotion: theory and research (pp. 181-205).
between disciplines. Possibly, on the next music
New York: Oxford University Press.
therapy conferences also music psychologists will Clark, David M. & Teasdale, John D. (1985).
be present. It is important to focus on these
Constraints on the effects of mood on memory.
interrelations, as current research is so often divided
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,
in separate specializations. Often a musicology
45,1595-1608.
approach is to focus on musical elements and to Dainow, Elliot (1977). Physical effects and motor
ignore psychological characteristics and vice versa
responses to music. Journal of Research in
the therapist often attaches less value to
Music Education, 211-219.
musicological aspects.
Dowling, W. Jay & Harwood, Daniel L. (1986).
Currently, the impression on conferences and
Music and Cognition. Londen: Academic
from the literature is that music therapy and music
Press.
psychology are two entirely different fields, which Droh, Roland & Spintge, Ralph (1987). Musik in
they of course are. But in each relationship, it is
der Medizin: Neurophysiologische
their differences that attract and which should be
Grundlagen, Klinische Applikationen,
elaborated more, such as the question how music
Geisteswissenschaftliche Einordnung. Berlin/
and emotions are related. I hold that the two partners
Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.
in this young relationship can benefit a great deal Erdonmez-Grocke, Denise (1999). A
from their 'living apart together' relationship.
Phenomenological Study of Pivotal Moments
in Guided Imagery and Music (GIM) Therapy,
[online] Music Therapy World Available from:
References
http://www.musictherapyworld.net/archive/
Aldridge, David (1996). Music therapy research
SQL/index.php3 [Accessed November 2001].
and practice: from out of the silence. London:
Evers, Frank, Jansma, Mireille, Mak, Peter & Vries,
Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
Bart de (1995). Muziekpsychologie. Assen:
Ansdell, Gary (2001). Musicology: misunderstood
Van Gorcum.
guest at the music therapy feast? In Aldridge,
Field, T.M. & Walden, T. (1982a). Perception and
G. Di Franco, E. Ruud, T. Wigram (Eds.). Music
production of facial expressions in infancy and
Therapy in Europe. Rome, Ismez/Onlus.
early childhood. In H.W. Reese & L.P. Lipsitt
Bartel,LeeR. (1992). The development of the
(Eds.). Advances in child development and
cognitive affective response test.
behavior (Vol. 16). New York: Academic Press.
Psychomusicology, 11, 15-26.
Fischer (1981). Biological time (pp. 357-382). In J.T.
Benenzon, Rolando O. (1981). Music therapy
Fraser (Ed.). 77;e voices of time. Amherst: The
manual. Springfield (II): Charles C.Thomas.
University of Massachusetts Press.
Berlyne, Daniel Ellis (1971). Aesthetics and
Frijda, Nico (1988). De Emoties(The Emotions).
psychobiology. New York: Appleton CenturyAmsterdam: Uitgeverij Bert Bakker.
Crofts.
Gerdner, Linda A. (2000). Effects of individualized
Bever, Thomas G. (1988). A cognitive theory of
versus classical relaxation music on the
emotion and aesthetics in music.
frequency of agitation in elderly persons with
Psychomusicology, 7(2), 165-175.
AD disease and related disorders. Intern.
Psychogeriatrics, 12,1,49-65.
Bonny, Helen (1986). Music and Healing. Music
Therapy, 6A, 7,3-12.
Goldstein, Avram (1980). Thrills in response to
Bunt, Leslie (1995). Muziektherapie. In: Evers,
music and other stimuli. Physiological
Jansma, Mak, De Vries (Eds).
Psychology, 8,1, 126-129.
Muziekpsychologie. Assen: Van Gorcum.
Gabrielson, A. & Juslin, P.N. (1996). Emotional
Nordic Journal of Music Therapy, 2001, 10(2)
ANNEM1EKVINK
for Depressed Patients. Journal of Music
Therapy, XXXII (3), 167-188.
Smith, David S. (1989). Preferences for
Differentiated Frequency Loudness Levels in
Older Adult Music Listening. Journal of Music
Therapy, XXVI (1), 18-29.
Stavenga, Anke (1979). Muziektherapie: Een
lnventarisatie van theorieen en werkwijzen.
Zeist: Dijkstra.
Terwogt, M. M., & Van Grinsven, F. (1991).
Musical expression of moodstates. Psychology
ofMusic, 19,99-109.
Waterman, Mitch G. (1992). Emotion in Music:
Towards a new methodology for the
investigation of appreciation. International
ADVERTISEMENT
V v-rXx^JC*Cj
A World Forum for Music Therapy
FORTNIGHTLY COLUMNS
SPONSORS
is a free online web-journal created to support the discursive practices of music therapists
around the world. The journal is located at this url: http://www.voices.no
Main Issue (March 1, July 1, November 1). The 3 issues will usually have a minimum of one
text from each continent, and the issues will include sub-sections such as: Clinical Papers,
Essays, International Archives.
Country of the Month. A new text presenting and discussing music therapy in a specific
country is presented every month.
Fortnightly Columns. All editors will write short comments and reflections, in an ongoing
series of "Columnist of the Week".
Discussions. At a frequency defined by the contributors open discussions and comments
will be published.
EDITORIAL BOARD
Editors-in-chief: Carolyn Kenny (USA/Canada) and Brynjulf Stige (Norway)
African Editor: Mercedes Pavlicevic (South Africa)
Asian Editor: Rika Ikuno (Japan)
Australasian Editor: Morva Croxson (New Zealand)
European Editor: Dorit Amir (Israel)
North-American Editor: Michele Forinash (USA)
South-American Editor: Lia Rejane Barcellos (Brazil)
Discussion Editors: Barbara Wheeler(USA) and Thomas Wosch(Germany)
Country of the Month Editor: Diego Schapiro (Argentina)
www.voices.no
Nordic Journal of Music Therapy, 2001, 10(2)