Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
LEFT UP TO US formed in the spring of 2016 when local volunteers for the
Our positions are guided by the Left Up To US Platform, which you can view at
leftuptous.org/platform. We officially endorse candidates in eleven races; these endorsements are the result of a democratic vote among our members. For races in
which we make no official endorsement, we provide information about the candidates that we believe will be useful to progressive voters.
We would love to cover everything that will be on every Austinites 2016 general
election ballot, but as a new organization we dont (yet!) have the resources for
such an endeavor. What we do have here is the culmination of our research on
twenty-five Austin-area races and the citys one ballot proposition, along with a
nuanced take on the presidential race (spoiler: we dont endorse Gary Johnson).
To see which races will be on your ballot, go to
http://www.votetravis.com/vexpress/display.do and enter your name and date of
birth. For information on early voting and Election Day polling locations and
hours, go to http://traviscountyclerk.org/eclerk/Content.do?code=E.4
ELECTIONS
District 7
Incumbent: Leslie Pool
Challenger: Natalie Gauldin
District 4
Incumbent: Greg Casar
Challengers: Louis Herrin, Gonzalo Camacho
District 10
Incumbent: Sherri Gallo
Challengers: Alison Alter, Nicholas Virden, Robert
Walker
2
Ballot
proposition
Proposition 1 (Mobility Bond)
While Austin desperately needs serious investment in transportation infrastructure to keep
up with our rapid population growth, this mobility bond leaves much to be desired. Its most
glaring flaw is that in a supposedly progressive
city with notoriously subpar public transportation for our size, this bond includes not a dime
for public transportation. The bond also seems
likely to speed up gentrification: its increase in
property taxes would exacerbate already rising
rents, and a good portion of the bond money is
targeted for beautification, which can also increase property values, benefiting landowners
but pricing out the disadvantaged. The process
behind the proposal also warrants suspicion:
it was put together and rushed through city
council at more than twice the speed of most
bond proposals, despite being the largest bond
measure in our citys history at $720 million,
and $380,000 of the $663,000 raised by Austin Forward, the political action committee
supporting the proposition, has come from
companies or individuals involved in road and
sidewalk construction or real estate development. On the positive side, the bond would
make the city more bikeable, and there is an
argument to be made that anything is better
than nothing when it comes to transportation
infrastructure.
ACC Board
Place 9
Incumbent: N/A
Candidates: Julie Ann Nitsch, Guadalupe Sosa,
Mitch Fuller, Jeremy Story
Left Up To US endorses Julie Ann Nitsch. Nitsch
is the only candidate for office in Austin who is
supported by Our Revolution, Bernie Sanderss
grassroots organization designed to elect Berniecrat candidates to state and local offices; she has
also earned endorsements from the Austin Central
Labor Council and the American Federation of
Teachers. She has been a member of the Austin
City Councils Committee on the Quality of Life
for College Students and serves on the Subcommittee on Transportation. As an ACC board member, she will fight for student services and workers
rights, including affordable health care and health
education for students, health care benefits and a
living wage for employees, affordable child care for
both students and employees, and improved public
transportation to all ACC campuses.
Holmes wants to create a groundwater conservation district in unprotected areas of the county.
Finally, he wants to increase transparency so that
residents know where their county taxes are going.
Gerald Dougherty (R) is moderate for a modern
Republican, though on his website he does brag
about leading the effort to defeat Austins 2014
light rail initiative.
ELECTIONS
Sheriff
Left Up To US endorses
Ashely Flashe Gordon (G). Gordon has been
very active in the community and is particularly
knowledgeable about issues relevant to Precinct 1.
She advocates for increasing environmental studies to assess the impact of development; increasing
sustainable food options, especially in disadvantaged communities; controlling and modifying
transportation options to reduce our carbon
footprint; offering free basic money management
classes; closing detention centers for undocumented persons; offering support services for transient
populations; increasing community leadership
opportunities for youth; and providing dual- and
triple-language education.
Incumbent: N/A
Candidates: Sally Hernandez (D), Joe Martinez
(R), Debbie Russell (G), Eric Guerra (L)
District Attorney
Incumbent: N/A
Candidates: Margaret Moore (D), Maura Phelan
(R)
Margaret Moore (D) wants to enact policies that
specifically address the disparate treatment of
minorities in the criminal justice system, explore
appointing special prosecutors to cases in which
police conduct results in the death of a citizen,
restore the funding and authority of the Public
Integrity Unit, prosecute polluters, and reduce
over-incarceration. Maura Phelan (R) wants to
reduce the number of defendants held in jail on insufficient cases, establish a sexual assault unit and
assign a victim/witness counselor to each sexual
assault case, and increase staffing for family abuse,
juvenile, and mental health cases.
ELECTIONS
District 47
Incumbent: Paul Workman (R)
Challengers: Ana Jordan (D), Scott McKinlay (L)
State Legislature
District 46
Incumbent: Dawnna Dukes (D)
Challengers: Gabriel Nila (R), Kevin Ludlow (L),
Adam Greeley (G)
District 49
Incumbent: N/A
Candidates: Gina Hinojosa (D), Rick Perkins (L)
AISD trustee Gina Hinojosa (D) supports improving funding for public education, protecting reproductive rights, allowing public universities to opt
out of campus carry laws, and increasing funding
State Board of Education
for mental health care. Rick Perkins (L) supports
reducing property taxes, promoting sustainable
District 5
development, and treating minor drug offenses
Incumbent: Ken Mercer (R)
with rehabilitation rather than incarceration.
Challengers: Rebecca Bell-Metereau (D), Ricardo
Perkins (L)
District 50
Incumbent: Celia Israel (D)
Challenger: Ceasar Ruiz (R)
District 10
Incumbent: Tom Maynard (R)
Challenger: Judy Jennings (D)
Railroad Commission
Incumbent: N/A
Candidates: Grady Yarbrough (D), Wayne Christian (R), Mark Miller (L), Martina Salinas (G)
Left Up To US endorses Martina Salinas (G).
Before we get into why were endorsing Salinas
over the other candidates, the most important
thing that all Texas voters should know about the
Railroad Commission is that it DOES NOT REGULATE RAILROADS. What it does do is regulate the oil and gas industry, gas utilities, pipeline
safety, liquid petroleum gas safety, surface coal,
and uranium mining. What an appropriate name,
right? Three of the four candidatesYarbrough,
Miller, and Salinassupport a recommendation
to change the name to the Texas Energy Resource
Commission. Grady Yarbrough (D) seems to just
have a hobby of running for various offices, none
of which he is particularly qualified for, and has
run as a Republican in the past. Mark Miller is
the Libertarian candidate that we came closest to
endorsing this year; he has relatively reasonable
views by the standards of a Libertarian, literally
wrote the book on the Texas Railroad Commission, and is the most knowledgeable candidate in
ELECTIONS
District 21
U.S. House
District 10
Incumbent: Michael McCaul (R)
Challengers: Tawana Cadien (D), Bill Kelsey (L)
Roger Williams (R), who is currently under investigation by the House Ethics Committee for allegedly using his position to benefit himself and a
car dealership he owns, identifies as a conservative
businessman and likes to tweet things like
#BacktheBlue. He supported Texass super-restrictive anti-abortion law, opposes stem-cell
research, believes that open-carry laws save lives,
endorsed Ted Cruz in the Republican primary,
9
believes in supporting health insurance companies instead of Medicare, wants to privatize Social
Security, and has said, I will support all efforts to
prevent the encroachment of gay marriage. Loren
Schneiderman (L) identifies with libertarianism
to such a degree that where most candidates have
Issues pages on their websites identifying the
candidates various stances, Schneidermans site
instead has a Beliefs page and an America page,
both of which list abstract libertarian beliefs so
that visitors get a bullet-point introduction to ideology and zero information about where he stands
on issues. But, you know, small government and
ignoring unjust social structures.
Kathi Thomas (D) wants to address climate
change, rebuild infrastructure, overturn Citizens
United, rebalance the economy so that it no longer
redistributes all our wealth to those at the very top,
enact reasonable gun safety laws, phase out fossil
fuel dependence, promote a living wage, add a
public option to the Affordable Care Act, eliminate
high-stakes testing, reform our criminal justice
system, promote equal pay for equal work, and
protect voting rights, LGBT rights, and access to
abortion.
District 35
Incumbent: Lloyd Doggett (D)
Challengers: Susan Narvaiz (R), Rhett Smith (L),
Scott Trimble (G)
Lloyd Doggett (D) has served in the House for
twenty-one years. He is passionate about funding research on the Zika virus, enacting common-sense gun legislation, and fighting drug
companies high prices. He voted against the big
bank bailouts, voted to pass the Dodd-Frank Wall
Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, led
efforts to crack down on corporate tax dodging,
and opposes cutting Medicare and Social Security.
He prioritizes public education, including efforts
to reduce the financial burden of higher education.
Susan Narvaiz (R) believes that the government is
overregulating Texans daily lives, particularly in
10
PRESIDENT
Candidates: Hillary Clinton (D), Donald Trump (R), Jill Stein (G), Gary Johnson (L)
e encourage voting for the presidential candidate that you believe will best advance progressive
change.
Some Left Up To US members support Hillary Clinton (D) because (1) her positions are far friendlier to
the progressive movement than Donald Trumps (R) are, (2) the influence of Bernie Sanders has led her
to advance the most progressive platform in Democratic Party history and has created an opportunity to
build progressive strength within the party, and/or (3) the weakness of Trump has created an opportunity to turn Texas blue for the first time since 1976.
Other members support Jill Stein (G) because (1) she has advanced by far the most progressive platform
of all the candidates, (2) the more votes the Greens get, the more likely Democrats should be to prioritize the concerns of the Left and work hard to court our votes, and/or (3) if the Green Party wins 5 percent of the national popular vote, it will qualify for millions of dollars in general election public funding
for the 2020 presidential race.
(We considered writing about Gary Johnson (L) but decided he wasnt worth addressing, since, as
Johnson so eloquently puts it, in billions of years, the sun is going to actually grow and encompass the
Earth, right?)
While we believe that keeping Donald Trump and the Republican Party away from the executive branch
is crucially important, we also believe that a vote for Jill Stein in Texas will not increase Trumps chances
of winning the presidency. Texas has consistently polled 1015 percentage points to the right of the national average all year, making it safe to say that the only way Texas will be close to turning blue this year
is if Clinton is already winning nationally in a landslide.
Left Up To US unequivocally rejects Donald Trump and all he stands for, and we believe that electing him to office would set the work of progressives back decades. We all want to promote progressive
change, and some of us are doing that by supporting Jill Stein and some by supporting Hillary Clinton.
11