Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Tribology International
journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/triboint
art ic l e i nf o
a b s t r a c t
Article history:
Received 15 April 2016
Received in revised form
5 June 2016
Accepted 12 June 2016
Available online 14 June 2016
Amorphous structure discovered from both the wear debris and the friction layer of the carbon/carbon
composites after the braking tests was attributed to the breakdown of crystallites in the graphitized bulk
material. Graphite layers produced through interlayer shear deformation were found to be the basic units
of the pyrocarbon during sliding while carbon ber tended to be worn into small fragments along the
ber axis in the primary stage of rubbing. The transition of graphitic pyrocarbon in the friction process
was described as four stages. Nano-scale carbon particles of onion-like structure were found in the ction
layer, which were likely to participate in the formation of friction layer and lubricate the friction process.
& 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Keywords:
Carbon/carbon composites
Brake discs
Debris analysis
Friction transitions
1. Introduction
Carbon/carbon (C/C) composites have been widely used as the
brake material for aircrafts due to their light weight, exceptional
friction performance, excellent thermal properties and dimensional stability at severe environment. The frictional properties
and general wear mechanisms of C/C composites were investigated for decades [14].
Because of the complex microstructure, serious deformation as
well as the atomic level interactions between the contact surfaces,
the phenomenon of wear was dened as a dynamic process which
was difcult to model [5]. Kasem et al. [6] presented that both
physico-chemical action and mechanical interaction were
responsible for the tribological transitions between the rst body
surfaces. In addition, the wear debris (third body) formation was
mainly due to the abrasion and fatigue of the rst bodies.
Researches about the wear debris of C/C composites showed
that the debris comprised a much lower structural order phase
compared with the well-graphitized parent matrix [7], which was
revealed through X-ray diffraction (XRD) study [8,9] as well as
transmission electron microscopy (TEM) analysis [1012]. Friction
layer of amorphous structure was also nonuniformly formed in the
dynamic wear process [13]. It was widely accepted that disordered
carbon layer formed on the friction surface protected the bulk
composites from further wearing and degradation [12], however,
how the disordered carbon in the friction layer was transformed in
n
Corresponding author.
E-mail address: yimaozhong@126.com (M. Yi).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.triboint.2016.06.018
0301-679X/& 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
498
Table 1
Braking parameters of normal landing and overload landing conditions.
Test conditions
Braking pressure
(MPa)
Normal landing
8
Overload landing
Kinetic energy
(MJ)
Braking speed
(km/h)
9.14
11.43
240
250
418:68C p
where -thermal conductivity, W/(m K); -density of the material,
g/cm3; -thermal diffusivity, cm2/s; Cp-the specic heat capacity.
Usually, the value of Cp at room temperature is considered to be
0.171 cal/(g K).
2.3. Braking tests
Fig. 1. Worn surface of the C/C brake disc after braking tests.
aligned basically along the ber axis direction (Fig. 2c). The RC
showed a glass-like carbon structure of entangled graphene layers
(Fig. 2d) which was the less-ordered phase in the C/C composites.
In the real usage of braking, the discs are subjected to shear
forces as well as impact loads. Resistance to failure under such
conditions is very important for the stability of the brake material.
The physical properties of the C/C composites in this study were
listed in Table 2.
Fig. 3 showed the coefcient of friction (COF) and the temperature measured by thermocouple during every normal landing
test. The COF stabilized at around 0.30 and the average measured
temperature at the stator disc of all the normal landing tests was
570 C. As listed in Table 2, the thermal conductivity perpendicular
to the friction surface was lower than that parallel to the friction
surface. Therefore, before the frictional heat was transferred to the
measure point (10 mm below the friction surface), part of the heat
was already conducted into the air along the direction parallel to
the friction surface. Generally, the measured temperature was
much lower than the true temperature of the friction interface.
The overload landing tests were arranged after the 10th, 18th
and 26th normal landing tests. The average COF of overload
landing tests was 0.32 and the average measured temperature was
680 C. The average sliding distance of normal landing tests and
overload landing were 440 m and 525 m, respectively.
Researches showed that higher speed would produce higher
frictional heat which might inuence the formation of friction lm
and the wear mechanism[17,18]. Overload landing tests of higher
braking speed and kinetic energy produced higher frictional work
and increased the temperature of the disc, which inuenced the
thermal stress distribution as well as the formation of friction
layer at the contact surfaces. The structure in the friction layer
might be rearranged and the thickness and size of the friction
layer were changed under the overload landing, leading to a
higher COF (0.32). It suggested that the steady wear surface
formed through normal landing was severely damaged after the
overload landing test. What is more, the structural damage of the
wear surface also increased the COF of the normal landing tests
following overload landing. As was seen from Fig. 3, it was noted
499
Fig. 2. Microstructure of the investigated C/C composites: (a) optical microscopy micrograph of the C/C composites; (b) HRTEM and the fast Fourier transform image of
pyrocarbon; (c) HRTEM and the fast Fourier transform image of carbon ber along the ber axis; (d) HRTEM and the fast Fourier transform image of resin-derived carbon.
Table 2
The properties of the C/C composites in this study.
Physical property
Graphitization degree
Compressive strength ( ? )
Flexural strength ( ? )
Thermal conductivity coefcient (room temperature)
?
//
63.2%
190.2 7 8 MPa
186.17 11 MPa
49.9 73 W/(m K)
128.0 78 W/(m K)
that the normal landing tests after overload landing, the 11th, 19th
and 27th, exhibited extremely higher COF at about 0.35 and
completely stop in a shorter time. It could be explained that the
badly worn wear surface at overload landing test reduced the
contact area between the discs, causing the temporary increase of
COF at the following normal landing test. When the braking
500
Fig. 3. The coefcient of friction and the measured temperature of every normal landing test.
Fig. 4. (a) SEM morphology of the detached particle debris; (b) high magnication SEM morphology of pyrocarbon debris.
501
Fig. 5. SEM morphologies of the wear debris: (a) an agglomeration of wear debris; (b) high magnication image of the aky debris at position ; (c) high magnication
image of the aky debris at position .
Fig. 6. TEM analysis of the graphite sheets in wear debris: (a) morphology of the detached graphite sheets of several layers; (b) morphology, (c) HRTEM image and (d) its
reconstructed image (produced by using a mask applied to the 2-D fast Fourier transform) of the graphite sheets at position ; (e) morphology, (f) HRTEM image and (g) the
fast Fourier transform image of folded area at position .
502
Fig. 7. TEM morphology of the aky debris: (a) detached graphite sheets with distortion and folded edges; (b) morphology and SAED pattern of broken sheets with wearinduced defects or holes; (c) HRTEM image and its fast Fourier transform image of the marked area.
Fig. 8. TEM analysis of the agglomerated debris and amorphous structure debris: (a) morphology, (b) HRTEM image and (c) the fast Fourier transform image of the
agglomerated debris; (d) morphology, (e) HRTEM image and (f) SAED pattern of the amorphous structure debris.
503
Fig. 9. (a) TEM morphology and (b) HRTEM image of the worn carbon ber fragments.
504
Fig. 10. Morphology of the friction layers obtained at the (a) outer diameter, (b) middle area and (c) inner diameter of the brake discs; (d) HRTEM image and the SAED
pattern of the amorphous structure in the friction layers.
505
Fig. 11. (a) Morphology and (b) HRTEM image of the nano-scale carbon particles observed in the friction layer.
Fig. 12. Structure transformation schematic of pyrocarbon and carbon ber during the wear process of carbon/carbon composites.
506
more, because of the dynamic wear process, the mutual transformation of sp3 and sp2 was always happening in the friction
interface. Such transformation would also have positive inuences
on the energy balance of the system, contributing to the stable
friction process of C/C composites.
In the braking of C/C composites, three dynamic balances
beneted the stable process. Firstly, from the perspective of
components in the composites, the soft pyrocarbon and relatively
hard carbon ber as well as resin-derived carbon would produce
wear debris of different types and basic units. The stable COF of
the composites resulted from the dynamic balance of interactions
of different carbon phases at the friction interface. Secondly, the
disruption of the sp2 dominant structure and the formation of the
sp3 dominant amorphous structure as well as the stress-induced
graphitization made up the dynamic sp2sp3 mutual transformation, which also contributed to the energy balance in the system.
Thirdly, there would be a dynamic balance of the formation and
destruction of friction layers at certain brake conditions. Continuous friction layer was related to the stable COF and low wear of
the C/C composites. Such structural transformations in the friction
interfaces jointly played positive roles in the stabilized friction
process of C/C composites.
4. Conclusions
From the analyzes of the debris and wear surface produced by
C/C composites for aircraft brake pairs after braking tests, the
following conclusions can be drawn.
(1) The basic unit of the pyrocarbon was the graphite layers
produced by interlayer shear deformation. Flaky wear debris
of graphite sheets experienced four major stages in the transition from ordered graphitic structure to amorphous type
structure, during which adsorption sites were produced in the
broken sheets to enhance the adsorption of vapor (water or
oxygen), leading to a lubricative effect on the sliding surface.
The wear of carbon ber mainly occurred along the ber axis
in the primary stage of rubbing.
(2) Friction layers formed at the worn surface were not uniform
from the outer diameter to the inner diameter and the middle
area was quite plausible to form a dense and continuous
friction layer. Onion-like nanoparticles were observed and
might serve as solid lubrication and participate in the formation of continuous friction layer on the wear surface.
(3) Dynamic balance of interactions of different carbon components in the friction interface, the sp2sp3 mutual transformation of carbon atoms as well as the dynamic balance of the
formation and destruction of friction layers jointly beneted
the stable friction process of C/C composites.
Acknowledgments
This research was nancially supported by the National Basic
Research Program of China (125-GH-116) and the State Key
Laboratory for Powder Metallurgy Foundation (2016), Central
South University, Changsha, China.
References
[1] Hutton TJ, Johnson D, McEnaney B. Effects of bre orientation on the tribology
of a model carboncarbon composite. Wear 2001;249:64755.
[2] Shin H, Lee H, Kim K. Tribological properties of pitch-based 2-D carboncarbon composites. Carbon 2001;39:95970.
[3] Ozcan S, Filip P. Microstructure and wear mechanisms in C/C composites.
Wear 2005;259:64250.
[4] Lee K, Tsai M, Cheng H. Effect of densication parameters on the low-energy
tribological behavior of carbon/carbon composites. Carbon 2010;48:135361.
[5] Zhao S, Hilmas GE, Dharani LR. Numerical simulation of wear in a C/C composite multidisc clutch. Carbon 2009;47:221925.
[6] Kasem H, Bonnamy S, Berthier Y, Dufrnoy P, Jacquemard P. Tribological,
physicochemical and thermal study of the abrupt friction transition during
carbon/carbon composite friction. Wear 2009;267:84652.
[7] Gong Q, Li Z, Zhang Z, Wu B, Zhou X, Huang Q, et al. Tribological properties of
carbon nanotube-doped carbon/carbon composites. Tribol Int 2006;39:937
44.
[8] Pevida C, Jacquemard P, Joly JP. Physicochemical properties of debris ejected
from C/C brakes with different structural orders. Carbon 2008;46:9941002.
[9] Rietsch JC, Dentzer J, Dufour A, Schnell F, Vidal L, Jacquemard P, et al. Characterizations of C/C composites and wear debris after heavy braking demands.
Carbon 2009;47:8593.
[10] Lee KJ, Chern Lin JH, Ju CP. Microstructure study of PAN-pitch carboncarbon
composite lubricative lm. Mater Chem Phys 2003;78:7606.
[11] Franois M, Joly JP, Kapsa P, Jacquemard P. A temperature-programmed desorption and oxidation investigation of wear debris from carbon/carbon composite aircraft brakes. Carbon 2007;45:12431.
[12] Lei B, He L, Yi M, Ran L, Xu H, Ge Y, et al. New insights into the microstructure
of the friction surface layer of C/C composites. Carbon 2011;49:455462.
[13] Murdie N, Ju CP, Don J, Fortunato FA. Microstructure of worn pitch/resin/CVI CC composites. Carbon 1991;29:33542.
[14] Zhang Q, Diao D, Yang L. Dangling bond induced cross-linking model in
nanoscratched graphene layers. Surf Coat Technol 2013;237:2303.
[15] Zhang Q, Diao D, Kubo M. Nanoscratching of multi-layer graphene by molecular dynamics simulations. Tribol Int 2015;88:858.
[16] Kumar N, Kozakov AT, Ravindran TR, Dash S, Tyagi AK. Load dependent friction
coefcient of crystalline graphite and anomalous behavior of wear dimension.
Tribol Int 2015;88:2809.
[17] Gopal P, Dharani LR, Blum FD. Hybrid phenolic friction composites containing
Kevlars pulp: part I. Enhancement of friction and wear performance. Wear
1996;193:199206.
[18] Gopal P, Dharani LR, Blum FD. Hybrid phenolic friction composites containing
Kevlars pulp: part IIwear surface characteristics. Wear 1996;193:1805.
[19] Ju CP, Chern Lin JH, Lee KJ, Kuo HH. Multi-braking tribological behavior of
PAN-pitch, PAN-CVI and pitchresin-CVI carboncarbon composites. Mater
Chem Phys 2000;64:196214.
[20] Xiong X, Huang B, Li J, Xu H. Friction behaviors of carbon/carbon composites
with different pyrolytic carbon textures. Carbon 2006;44:4637.
[21] Nian J, Si Y, Guo Z. Advances in atomic-scale tribological mechanisms of solid
interfaces. Tribol Int 2016;94:113.
[22] Lei B, Yi M, Xu H, Ran L, Ge Y, Peng K. Effect of resin-derived carbon on the
friction behavior of carbon/carbon composites. Tribol Lett 2011;41:3718.
[23] Bing KY, Ishihara T. The surface morphology and structure of carbon-carbon
composites in high-energy sliding contact. Wear 1994;174:1117.
[24] Xu HJ, Huang BY, Yi MZ, Xiong X, Lei BL. Inuence of matrix carbon texture on
the temperature eld of carbon/carbon composites during braking. Tribol Lett
2011;44:1824.
[25] Byrne C. Modern carbon composite brake materials. J Compos Mater
2004;38:183750.