Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
www.elsevier.com/locate/enconman
a,*
, Paulo R. Wander
a,b
, Ronaldo M. Barreto
Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Caxias do Sul, Rua Francisco Getulio Vargas 1130-Bloco G,
Caxias do Sul, RS 95070-560, Brazil
b
Mechanical Engineering Postgraduation Program (PROMEC), Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul
State (UFRGS), Brazil
Received 30 August 2002; accepted 26 December 2002
Abstract
This paper deals with the computational simulation of a wood waste (sawdust) gasier using an equilibrium model based on minimization of the Gibbs free energy. The gasier has been tested with Pinus
Elliotis sawdust, an exotic specie largely cultivated in the South of Brazil. The biomass used in the tests
presented a moisture of nearly 10% (wt% on wet basis), and the average composition results of the gas
produced (without tar) are compared with the equilibrium models used. Sensitivity studies to verify the
inuence of the moisture sawdust content on the fuel gas composition and on its heating value were made.
More complex models to reproduce with better accuracy the gasier studied were elaborated. Although the
equilibrium models do not represent the reactions that occur at relatively high temperatures (800 C) very
well, these models can be useful to show some tendencies on the working parameter variations of a gasier.
2003 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.
Keywords: Wood wastes; Gasication process; Simulation
1. Introduction
Usually, biomass gasiers are complex equipment that require a lot of time to be mounted and
to be put in operation. Therefore, it is very dicult to explore various working conditions, such as
0196-8904/03/$ - see front matter 2003 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.
doi:10.1016/S0196-8904(03)00025-6
2764
the variation of moisture content in the biomass, air/biomass ratio, dierent biomass materials
etc. Because of this, some works were made to predict the performance of gasiers [14].
At moderately high temperatures (<800 C), as in the pyrolysis and gasication reactions of
biomass, the kinetic models are more suitable and accurate, in spite of the high complexity of the
models. Some works that use kinetic models to represent the biomass gasication process will be
seen next. In the Chowdhury et al. work [1], a kinetic model of a downdraft rice husk gasier was
adopted, which includes the tar presence and the kinetic parameters of this substance based on the
works of Wen and Caln [5] and Serio et al. [6]. Solving the equations for the concentration proles
of dierent components of the reactants and product gases with the heat transfer equations between the solids and gas phases determines the concentration and temperature proles required
into the reactor.
In the article by S
anchez et al. [7], the results for determination of the kinetic parameters from
the Arrhenius equation, for the rice husk and sugarcane bagasse that validate a mathematical
model are presented. The experimental data were obtained with a uidized bed reactor operating
under temperatures between 975 and 1250 K. An other similar study was developed before by
Roll and Hedden [2].
Although thermodynamic equilibrium, in reality, never takes place in the gasication process
[1], particularly at fairly high temperatures (<800 C), many works were performed to demonstrate the applicability of the equilibrium models to the gasication process. These models are
especially good at the high temperatures that occur on the entrained ow gasiers where the
reaction temperatures are above 1500 K [8]. In this work, the applicability of the minimization of
the Gibbs free energy at the equilibrium to the coal gasication process was shown. A routine
called SYNGAS in FORTRAN language was implemented to predict the composition of the fuel
gas produced.
In the work developed by Elmegaard and Korving [3], the biomass gasication process, rather
than all the IGCC power plant, is simulated by Cycle-Tempo software (Delft University, Netherlands) and DNA software (Lyngby University, Denmark). Particularly with respect to the gasication process of the plant, the Cycle-Tempo gasier model was simulated through two gasier
modules coupled in series to improve the minimization of Gibbs free energy method. In this
model, each gasier produces fuel gas at dierent equilibrium temperatures and with intermediate
separation of the gas components and subsequent separation of the ashes. All air is added to the
rst gasier component.
In Zainal et al. [4], an equilibrium model based on equilibrium constants was used to predict the
gasication process in a downdraft gasier for dierent biomass materials. In this work, the eects
of initial moisture content in the wood and the temperature in the gasication zone on the
composition and caloric value of the fuel gas produced was investigated.
Reed and Das [9] showed the inuence of the biomass moisture content and oxygen on gas
heating value, indicating that the reduction of this parameter by increasing the rst factor is
compensated by the enrichment of the second. These authors also show that the air/biomass ratio
must be between 2.0 and 2.4 to determine the best eciency on the gasication process.
Some experimental works [1014] were performed with small biomass gasiers (up to 200 kW)
to verify the global performance of the equipment under dierent conditions but not enough to
study the inuence in the fuel gas characteristics (composition and heating value) of the working
parameters: initial moisture content of the biomass, gasication temperatures, dierent biomass
2765
materials etc. Obviously, and as already mentioned in the beginning, it would be an arduous
work, requiring many tests to exploit all dierent conditions of operation. Thereby, it is very
interesting to use models that reproduce and predict the gasier behavior with accuracy.
In this paper, initially, the results of a sensitivity study for the eects of the sawdust moisture
content at certain reaction temperatures on gasication characteristics are shown. A simple
gasication process model was conceived to allow realization of the study, and the working
gasier parameters were obtained from a gasier built and tested by the authors. The sensitivity
analysis has been conducted through a routine described in Altani [8] and Cycle-Tempo software. Both programs adopt an equilibrium model based on minimization of the Gibbs function,
considered the driving force of a chemical reaction. Similar operating conditions to simulate the
gasication process were conceived with the two programs.
As the gasier built presents an internal gas recirculation to raise the reduction zone temperature, the sensitivity study based on simple equilibrium models is not a simple task. In this way,
complex models based on the Cycle-Tempo software were conceived to reproduce more accurately the gasier built and to reach the gas composition obtained at the tests, whose values were
similar to those reported in the literature.
Weight (%)
Carbon
Oxygen (by dierence)
Nitrogen
Hydrogen
Sulfur
Ash
HHV [MJ/kg]
LHV [MJ/kg]
52.00
41.55
0.28
6.07
0.10
20.407
19.087
2766
results presented in Table 1 are very similar to those found in the literature and conrm, as
mentioned, uniformity on the percentages of elements, even to dierent wood species.
The sawdust mass ow processed in the gasier, the ultimate analysis and the heating values
results shown in Table 1 were used on the sensitivity studies presented here. In these studies, some
parameters were xed, such as the dry sawdust mass ow processed (11.34 kg/h), the reaction
absolute pressure equal to the local atmospheric pressure (0.93 bar) and the gasication reaction
temperature (800 C). The sawdust elemental composition was varied due to the moisture content
variation from 0% to 30%, resulting in changes in the heating value.
2.00
1.98
1.96
REACTION TEMPERATURE = 800C
1.94
1.92
1.90
1.88
0
10
15
20
25
30
Fig. 1. Eect of the sawdust moisture content (wet basisw.b.) on air/sawdust mass ratio.
N2
50
40
REACTION TEMPERATURE = 800C
30
H2
20
CO
CO 2
10
CH 4
0
0
10
15
20
25
30
Fig. 2. Eect of the sawdust moisture content (w.b.) on the fuel gas composition.
5200
5000
10
15
20
25
30
95
90
EFFICIENCY (%)
carbon conversion
85
cold gas
65
60
0
10
15
20
25
30
Fig. 4. Eect of the sawdust moisture content (w.b.) on carbon conversion and cold gas eciencies.
2767
2768
The air/sawdust mass ratio results were lower than those mentioned in the literature [9], with a
maximum value equal to 1.982 at 20% sawdust moisture content. Water in the sawdust tends to
reduce the reaction temperature because it steals heat from the reaction for its vaporization and
the water vapor can react with other compounds in the simultaneous reactions that occur in the
gasication process. Thereby, if the sawdust moisture content is increased, more O2 (air) must be
supplied to the reaction to maintain its temperature constant. However, more air to the reaction
means more of both oxygen and nitrogen. This last tends to dilute the reactant matter and reduces
the reaction temperature. Therefore, it is understood that to maintain constant the reaction
temperature, the air/sawdust ratio increases with the moisture content up to a certain point, after
which, the ratio decreases.
The eect of the sawdust moisture content on fuel gas composition (Fig. 2), in consequence
of the results observed in Fig. 1, shows a reduction in the percentages of H2 (1.6%, i.e.
7:7%j0% moisture ) and CO (8.92%, i.e. about 40%j0% moisture ) and an increase in the percentages of
CO2 (5.36%, i.e. about 64%j0% moisture ) and N2 (5.16%, i.e. 10:6%j0% moisture ). Practically, the CH4
content was negligible. On a rst view of the process, the air/sawdust ratio increase determines a
higher oxidation of both Cs and CO to CO2 , and thereby, the content of this last component of
the fuel gas rises. Also, the air/sawdust increase brings about a larger presence of N2 in the fuel gas
composition. The H2 content reduction with increase of the moisture content in the sawdust is
attributed to the higher mass of water vapor in the fuel gas produced in relation to the water mass
in the reactants. This is observed from the fuel gas composition results at wet basis, meaning that
water vapor generated by initial drying of wet sawdust can either react with Cs or CO with
production of CO and H2 . However, the latter is oxidized with a higher reaction rate than that of
decomposition of H2 O with Cs or CO.
Actually, chemically speaking, the formation reaction of water from H2 and O2 is more favorable at the equilibrium temperature of 800 C because the driving force (Gibbs free energy of
formation) for this reaction is greater than that of the decomposition reaction mentioned before
[DG0f;H2 O; 800 C 189 kJ/mole against DG0CsH2 O; 800 C 18 kJ/mole and DG0COH2 O; 800 C
0:8 kJ/mole [17]]. Also, in this sense, the methane formation reaction from Cs and H2 at the
equilibrium temperature of 800 C is not favored because its DG0f is positive and approximately
equal to 27.5 kJ/mole. Still less favorable is the reaction of formation of CH4 at the equilibrium
from the reaction CO 3H2 ! CH4 H2 O, in which DG0 is around 46 kJ/mole. Although, the
CO2 reaction formation from Cs and O2 presents the highest value of DG0f 396 kJ/mole at 800
C) compared with the other components taken into account in the analysis, its formation in the
gasication process is inhibited because of the smaller quantity of O2 present in this reaction. The
DG0f CO value at the equilibrium temperature of 800 C ( 207 kJ/mole) determines favorable
conditions to the formation of this species, in spite of the reduction with the moisture content
previously mentioned.
The negligible CH4 content on the fuel gas produced and the CO and H2 content reduction with
the sawdust moisture content explain the reduction in the LHV of the fuel gas shown in Fig. 3.
According to Fig. 4, the carbon conversion eciency increases 15.28% and the cold gas eciency rises 2.94%, between 0% and 20% sawdust moisture content and from this last value up to
moisture content 30% decreases 1.46%. As the increase of CO2 (64% on molar basis and about
120% on mass basis) is higher than the decrease of CO (40% on molar basis and 18.3% on mass
basis), it justies the rise on the carbon conversion eciency observed in Fig. 4. The behavior of
2769
Table 2
Comparison between SYNGAS routine analysis and experimental results
H2 (vol. %)
CO (vol. %)
CH4 (vol. %)
C2 H4 (vol. %)
C2 H6 (vol. %)
CO2 (vol. %)
N2 (vol. %)
HHV (kJ/N m3 )
msawdust (kg/h)
Air/sawdust ratio
mfuelgas (kg/h)
gcoldgas (%)
SYNGAS routine
20.06
19.70
0
10.15
50.10
5042
12.60
1.957
33.96
67.99
14.00
20.14
2.31
0.57
0.14
12.06
50.79
5276
11.70
1.829
31.89
62.86
the cold gas eciency shown in Fig. 4 is relative to the variation of the parameters identied in the
analysis.
Table 2 shows a comparison between the results obtained from the SYNGAS routine simulations and those obtained from the experimental tests. The SYNGAS routine results refer to the
condition of 10% sawdust moisture content and reaction temperature of 800 C at the equilibrium. The experimental test results refer to an average of 10 tests performed at the gasier
commented initially, whose sawdust moisture content has been approximately 11% and the reaction temperature was nearly 832 C. The average fuel gas composition is on the dry basis and O2
free.
Although the H2 CO content obtained from the SYNGAS routine (39.76%) was higher than
the average value of the experiments (34.14%), the presence of CH4 , C2 H4 and C2 H6 in the actual
fuel gas composition, determines the highest HHV for it (5276 kJ/N m3 as the experimental value
against 5042 kJ/N m3 for the SYNGAS routine value, both determined from the combustion heat
of the gas components). The H2 content of the simulations is 6.06% larger than that of the experimental tests, while the CO content is 0.44% lower than the experimental value. The higher
values in the simulation for the sawdust and the fuel gas masses determine a higher cold gas
eciency for the SYNGAS routine value than that of the experiments.
2770
2771
Table 3
Eect of the sawdust moisture content on the gasier operation parameters
Moisture
content
(weight %)
Air/sawdust
ratio
CO
CH4
CO2
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
2.0841
2.0252
1.9637
1.9101
1.8601
1.8077
1.7603
20.59
20.96
21.40
21.64
21.76
21.76
21.57
26.73
25.08
23.00
21.09
19.18
17.33
15.44
0.02
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.01
7.28
8.49
9.74
10.95
12.15
13.31
14.44
gcoldgas (%)
N2
LHV
(kJ/kg)
44.85
44.92
45.31
45.75
46.34
47.02
47.98
5060
4819
4573
4302
4015
3723
3408
77.6
76.8
76.0
74.9
73.7
72.4
70.8
equally, the N2 content increases constantly, in spite of this the raise being from 44.85% to
47.98% against the raise from 48.57% to 53.71%;
equally, the LHV decreases constantly;
conversely, the cold gas eciency decreases constantly, with a maximum value of 77.6% at 0%
of moisture content versus 68.1% at 20% of moisture content.
Although some results present the same tendency in both studies, especially on fuel gas composition and on heating values, the dierences observed in the SYNGAS study relative to the
Cycle-Tempo study are attributed mainly to the dierence of the carbon conversion eciency. In
the SYNGAS simulations, this eciency varied from 78.14% to 93.42%, and in the Cycle-Tempo
analysis it was maintained constant and equal to 95%, whose value was an average of those
obtained in the tests with the gasier built.
2772
Table 4
Typical properties of the fuel gas produced from a biomass gasier
Chemical species
CO
CO2
H2
H2 O
CH4
N2
HHV (kJ/N m3 )
Dry basis
21.0
9.7
14.5
4.8
1.6
48.4
5506
22.1
10.2
15.2
1.7
50.8
5800
10%, its mass ow was equal to 12.6 kg/h, the reaction absolute pressure was around 0.93 bar and
the heat loss in the gasier models was 1%, based on sawdusts HHV. Other parameters are
identied in the following gures.
Initially, Fig. 6 presents a Cycle-Tempo gasier model simulated through two gasier modules
coupled in series. In this model, the rst gasier produces fuel gas at an equilibrium temperature
of 400 C and the second at 800 C, being considered an intermediate separation of the gas
components and a subsequent separation of the ashes. All air is added to the rst gasier component, 2% of unconverted carbon is considered and the streams 20 and 21 (gasier 4) and the
streams 30 and 31 (gasier 8) are necessary to run the model, but its mass ow rates are equal to
zero. In Fig. 6, it is observed that to achieve the fuel gas composition (on the right side of the
gure) similar to that of the literature, it was necessary to bypass some components of the gaseous
mixture (40% of CH4 , 52% of CO2 , 30% of H2 and 67% of H2 O). In the scheme, a separator (15) of
water was considered to simulate a moisture free fuel gas composition at the end (sink 16). The
fuel gas composition obtained is very similar to that in the literature. The air/sawdust ratio used
was 2, a bit less than that reported (2.36), and the HHV resultant (5339 kJ/N m3 ) is 7.9% smaller
than that identied in Table 4 (5800 kJ/N m3 ).
In the model shown in Fig. 7, all air is added in the two rst parallel gasiers, one operating at
an equilibrium temperature of 430 C and the other at 1225 C, whose total air/sawdust ratio is
almost 2.97. An unconverted small portion of the entering carbon of 2% in mass was considered,
2773
Fig. 7. Cycle-Tempo gasication scheme with two gasier modules in parallel and in series with a third.
and the remaining sawdust mass ow rate was divided into two portions, i.e. one third to module
6 and two thirds to module 7. The separator 9 bypasses a portion of the gas produced at reactors 6
and 7, and the remaining gas portion that contains 3.71% in mass of carbon passes to the gasier
10, in which the equilibrium temperature is 850 C. The module 12 separates the unconverted
carbon and ashes, and the fuel gas composition obtained on the molar and wet basis is indicated
in Fig. 7 (sink 13). Comparing to results for fuel gas composition found in the literature, those
obtained through the Cycle-Tempo scheme of Fig. 7 indicate the following: H2 and H2 O contents
are higher, N2 , CO2 and CH4 contents are smaller and CO content is practically equal. The HHV
obtained in the simulation is 4.6% less than the value reported in the literature.
The Cycle-Tempo schemes of Figs. 8 and 9 are similar to the scheme of Fig. 7 with respect to
the gasication process, i.e. the rst two gasiers work in parallel and a third reactor operates
in series with them. The dierence is in the sawdust mass ow portions to the reactors 5 and 6,
Fig. 8. Cycle-Tempo gasication scheme with two gasier modules in parallel and in series with a third. Use of a
chemical reactor module in parallel with third gasier.
2774
Fig. 9. Cycle-Tempo gasication scheme with two gasier modules in parallel and in series with a third. Use of a
chemical reactor module in series with third gasier.
i.e. the rst receives two thirds of the sawdust mass and the second receives one third. Other
dierences are: the unconverted carbon in schemes 8 and 9 is separated by separator 9, and its
value is 5% in mass relative to the separator entering stream (11); the gasier 16 receives only
carbon that reacts with CO2 on the Boudouard reaction with H2 O separated in the module 10
through stream 14; CO2 , H2 O and CH4 , separated in 10, mix with a portion of air (400 C) that is
assumed to pass by several zones of the actual gasier without reacting; the remaining fuel gas,
not separated in 10, bypasses reactor 16 (stream 15), in which the equilibrium temperature is 800
C, and passes through a chemical reactor module that reforms the methane at 620 C in Fig. 8
scheme. In the scheme of Fig. 9, the chemical reactor module (17) reforms the fuel gas that results
from the mixture of the streams coming from the reactor (16) and from the separator (10) at a
temperature of 634 C. The results reported in the model shown in Fig. 8 indicate the following
dierences relative to the literature: H2 /+1.16%, H2 O/+3.86%, N2 /)5.60%, CO2 /)0.25%, CH4 /
+0.51% and CO/)0.19%; the higher heating value resultant is very close to the expected value, i.e.
the dierence is only 1%. The fuel gas composition obtained in the scheme of Fig. 9 indicates the
following dierences relative to the literature: H2 /+5.38%, H2 O/+0.72%, N2 /)6.70%, CO2 /
+1.72%, CH4 /)0.04% and CO/)1.55%; the HHV is approximately 1.6% higher than that reported
in Reed and Das [9].
With the purpose of simulating more closely the gasier described in Section 2, with recirculation and burning in an internal chamber of a portion of the fuel gas (including tar) produced in
the pyrolysis zone, Fig. 10 scheme was idealized. In this scheme, part of the total air for the reaction (total air/sawdust ratio equal to 1.872) is introduced into the reactor 2 that simulates the
pyrolysis zone, assuming an equilibrium temperature of 550 C. In the gasier built, this air
portion is aspirated through the open top by a fan. In order to consider that a small air quantity
that comes into the gasier by the open top and does not react with any element of the sawdust, it
is supposed that some air (source 14) arrives at the reduction zone (module 16) at a temperature of
400 C and absolute pressure of 0.92 bar. Another portion of air is forced by a small fan into a
tube, central at the gasier, passing through a venturi that aspirates part of the fuel gases produced in the pyrolysis zone and burned later in a chamber. This air portion, in the scheme of Fig.
10, is introduced into combustor 6 at adopted conditions of 200 C (the central tube where air
passes is surrounded by pyrolyzing sawdust) and absolute pressure of 0.935 bar. The component 4
2775
Fig. 10. Cycle-Tempo gasication scheme with two gasier built in recirculation operation conditions.
of Fig. 10 separates all solid parts of stream 3 and in separator 9, a portion of 5% in mass of the
total carbon of stream 9 is separated. The remaining carbonaceous mass (stream 12) is heated to
800 C in a ctitious heater (10) by a hot gaseous mass (stream 7) resulting from the mixture of
gases coming from splitter 5 and combustor 6. The gaseous mass of stream 15 resulting from the
separation of 100% of CH4 in module 11 is mixed with the portion of air at 400 C (source 14). At
last, the nal fuel gas, stream 25 to sink 17, is derived from the mixture of the fuel gas produced in
gasier 16, in which the equilibrium temperature adopted is equal to 800 C, with CH4 separated
in 11. On the basis of the fuel gas composition obtained (stream 25), the following dierences
relative to the literature are observed: H2 / + 3.44%, H2 O/ + 2.78%, N2 /)6.30%, CO2 /)0.08%, CH4 /
)0.23% and CO/)0.10%. The HHV determined from the fuel gas composition reported in Fig. 10
(5457 kJ/N m3 ) is about 0.9% smaller than that reported in the literature (5506 kJ/N m3 ).
6. Conclusions
This article demonstrates the application of chemical equilibrium to the biomass gasication
process. The gasication conditions for the analysis were established for a small sawdust open top
gasier built and tested during 2001. In order to predict the operation of a gasier, the availability
of a fairly simplied method to do it is important, and at the same time, it should be reliable and
accurate. The chemical equilibrium model meets these prerogatives because it involves only
thermodynamic parameters. The kinetic models, involving parameters such as reaction rate,
residence time etc., are very complex and not generic to implement computationally. Particularly,
the chemical equilibrium theory based on minimization of the Gibbs free energy is very general
2776
and relatively easy to implement a computer routine to determine the fuel gas composition
produced in a gasier. However, this method is only ecient to simulate gasication processes
carried out at high temperatures (>1500 K). At low reaction temperatures (<1000 K), the reaction
rate is smaller, and the residence time is higher, so the kinetic theory is more suitable to deal with
this reaction. Assessing the variation of the standard Gibbs free energy with temperature, it is
observed that for temperature values above 800 C (1073 K), for example, the equilibrium is
displaced in the direction of CO and H2 formation, with less tendency to CO2 and H2 O formation.
However, at low reaction temperature (400 C for example), as in the pyrolysis reaction, the
equilibrium is displaced in the direction of CH4 formation, and certainly, with a lower carbon
conversion, depending on the air/sawdust ratio too. This is observed in the fuel gas compositions
of stream 4 (Fig. 6), stream 8 (Fig. 7), stream 7 (Figs. 8 and 9) and stream 3 (Fig. 10), with the
following average values of contents (molar %) of the components: Cs 32.63; H2 9.81; H2 O
21.22; N2 14.20; CO2 13.04; CH4 7.61; and CO 1.29; and air/sawdust ratio 0.544. In the
simulations made with the SYNGAS routine and with the Cycle-Tempo program, where the
gasication process was simulated by simplied models, for both cases, at equilibrium temperatures of 800 C (1073 K), it was possible to conrm what was said above, relative to equilibrium
temperature. It was observed that the formation of H2 is beyond that foreseen in the literature,
and the methane formation is practically negligible. However, the CO formation is below that
reported in the literature in almost all the range of sawdust moisture content, unless to values
lower than 10%. The validity of the sensitivity studies, such as those made in this article, is the
quick way with good accuracy in predicting the working parameters of a gasier.
On the basis of the chemical equilibrium method, more complex models are necessary to reproduce the actual operation of a gasier. Thereby, the availability of simulation software is
important because this can make the analysis a fairly easy task. The models illustrated in Figs. 6
10 present several ctitious components (separators, gasiers, chemical reactors etc.) necessary to
obtain the best results in terms of the nal fuel gas composition.
References
[1] Chowdhury R, Bhattacharya P, Chakravarty M. Modeling and simulation of a downdraft rice husk gasier. Int J
Energy Res 1994;18:58194.
[2] Roll H, Hedden K. Entrained ow gasication of coarsely ground Chinese reed. Chemical Engineering and
Processing 1994:35361.
[3] Elmegaard B, Korving A. Analysis of an integrated biomass gasication/combined cycle plant. Eciency, cost,
optimization, simulation and environmental aspects of energy systems and processesECOS98, vol. 2, Nancy,
France, 1998, p. 5918.
[4] Zainal ZA et al. Prediction of performance of a downdraft gasier using equilibrium modeling for dierent biomass
materials. Energy Conv Mgmt 2001;42:1499515.
[5] Wen WY, Caln E. Catalytic pyrolysis of a coal tar in a xed-bed reactor. Ind Eng Chem Process Des Dev
1984;23:62737.
[6] Serio MA, Peters WA, Howard JB. Kinetics of vapor-phase secondary reactions of prompt coal pyrolysis tars. Ind
Eng Chem Res 1987;26:18318.
ao de Par^
ametros Cineticos da Pir
olise de Casca de Arroz e
[7] Sanchez CG, Sanchez EMS, de Resende FLP. Obtenc~
Bagaco de Cana em Leito Fluidizado. XV Congresso Brasileiro de Engenharia Mec^
anicaCOBEM99, S~
ao Paulo,
Brazil, 1999.
2777
[8] Altani CR. A chemical equilibrium model of the coal gasication process based on the minimization of the Gibbs
free energy. Florence World Energy Research SymposiumFLOWERS97, Florence, Italy, 1997. p. 41927.
[9] Reed TB, Das A. Handbook of biomass downdraft gasier engine systems. Golden/USA: Biomass Energy
Foundation Press; 1987.
[10] Walawender WP, Chern SM, Fan LT. Wood chip gasication in a commercial downdraft gasier. In: International
Conference on Conversion. Estes Park, CO, USA: Elsevier Applied Science Publishers; 1982. p. 91121.
[11] Bilbao R et al. Desarollo de gasicacion de lecho movil en corrientes descendentes para residuos lignocelulosicos.
Spain: Revista Ingeneria Quimica; 1990. p. 2315.
[12] Mukunda HS et al. Gasiers and combustors for biomasstechnology and eld studies. Energy Sustain Develop
1994;1(3).
[13] Bacaicoa PG et al. Scale-up of downdraft moving bed gasiers (25300 kg/h)design, experimental aspects and
results. Bioresour Technol 1994;48:22935.
[14] Martin J, Bourgois F, Servais M. Small scale electricity production on basis of a reciprocating engine fed by a wood
chips gasier. Powergen Conference, Amsterdam, Netherlands, 1995.
aveis para o
[15] Wander PR. Utilizac~ao de resduos de madeira e lenha como alternativas de energias renov
desenvolvimento sustenavel da regi~ao Nordeste do Estado do Rio Grande do Sul. PhD Thesis. Programa de P
osGraduac~ao em Engenharia Mec^anicaPROMEC, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre,
Brazil, 2001.
[16] Press WH et al. Numerical recipes in FORTRANthe art of scientic computing. 2nd ed. Cambridge, UK:
Cambridge University Press; 1992.
[17] Stull DR, Prophet H. JANAFThermochemical tables. Midland, USA: Dow Publishing Company; 1971.