Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
SPE 23379
The Treatment and Disposal of Oily Solids
A.A.D. Wright and B.A. Noordhuis, Brunei Shell Petroleum
ABSTRACT
Oily solids are generated as a waste
product of Brunei Shell Petroleum's
drilling and production activities. The
main sources are waste oil based mUd,
tank bottom sludges, and oil
contaminated soil. The oily solids are
stored in a purpose built holding basin
which is gradually being filled up. The
need for appropriate treatment and an
acceptable means of final disposal of
the solids has been recognised as an
item for attention in the Company's
Environmental Management Plan. The
paper describes the reSUlting
feasibility study which is evaluating
the relative merits of processes such as
incineration, lime stabilisation, and
landfarming. The feasibility study is
considering the quantity and properties
of the solids, the environmental
conditions in Brunei, the availability
of treatment services in the country,
and the need to define a2ceptable
environmental criteria for the treatment
and disposal methods. The way in which
these factors influence the study are
discussed.
INTRODUCTION
Brunei Darussalam is situated on the
North west of Borneo. The basis of its
economy is oil and gas,
SPE 23379
THE SOLIDS
LANDFARHING
Landfarming involves ploughing oily
solids into the soil together with
fertiliser and allowing bacteria in the
soil to degrade the hydrocarbons
naturally. It is a simple and
relatively cheap process with which
there is considerable experience
worldwide, particularly at refinery
sites. Climatic condition in Brunei
would be favorable, but partiGular care
would need to be taken to contain and
treat leachate in this low lying area
with a high ground water water level.
This would require a specially
constructed landfarm.
522
SPE 23379
INCINERATIQH
STABILISATION
523
OTHER PROCESSES
The oily solids treatment and disposal
feasibility study is also evaluating the
benefits of using other innovative
processes either in isolation or in
combination with the above established
technologies. The processes being
considered are bioremediation, drying,
solvent extraction, vacuum extraction
and vitrification. Bioremediation would
involve adding bacteria and nutrients
and providing favourable conditions
within a reaction site (which could be
the Sungai Bera Holding Basin).
Vitrification would be considered as a
technique for rehabilitating the holding
basin. The other processes would be
considered as a sub-set of all the
established technologies.
SELECTION OF THE PREFERRED PROCESSES
The selection of the preferred treatment
and disposal methods will depend upon a
number of criteria. Firstly options to
be considered must be proven to be
technically capable of producing
products which can be disposed of in
environmentally acceptable manner in
Brunei. This includes solid products
which may be discharged to a landfill as
well as any effluents or emissions which
may be produced from the treatment
process. A full environmental impact
assessment is to be prepared as part of
the feasibility study.
The cost of environmentally acceptable
processes will then be compared to allow
the most cost-effective combination of
methods to be selected. Included in the
costs will be all aspects of
constructing and operating the facility
including the interfaces and logistics
involved in transporting solids from the
points of generation to the facility and
from the treatment facility to the
disposal site. It is likely that more
than one treatment technique will be
selected such that bulk non-hazardous
material is treated by a relatively
inexpensive method whereas a more
expensive method may be required for the
smaller quantity of material which is
more difficult to adequately treat.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
The authors would like to thank the
management of Brunei Shell Petroleum and
H.M. Government's Petroleum Unit for
permission to pUblish this paper.
524
SPE 23379
SP
WATER
SAMPLES
pH
~.O.C.
IIYDROCllRJlOH
cr-
rag/kg
rag/kg
rag/kg
N.W. Basin
S82
6.9
47.3
14.1
12.8
1780
238
6.9
50.5
20.4
20.3
3920
133
7225
7.0
59.0
22.7
16.3
1900
231
7116
S83
15197
30.7
S84
37.8
3298
SSl
11.2
3528
58.5
6141
6063
N.E. Basin
6.5
25.0
26.5
25.6
200
287
5.4
7.9
62.0
38.4
240
287
6131
6.5
9.8
60.0
32.1
140
168
9792
1365
ELBIIEIlT
mq/kq
SBZ
SB3
SBC
Hq
4.1
13.9
52.8
36.1
59.3
9.1
13.7
Pb
1002
548
336.3
311.7
402.8
796
695
As
Se
P
Mo
258.1
295.0
314.0
494.6
509.8
511.7
6063
7225
7116
7159
5368
10090
62.4
68.8
75.0
Cd
<1
<1
31.8
25.3
40.3
<1
<1
Ni
<10
<10
74.8
205.5
381.9
<10
<10
5.4
38.4
54.1
153.4
773.6
944.0
17.3
196.2
282.3
424.2
526.4
1365
6131
9792
2845
11125
18165
47.1
74.6
<1
27.8
41.9
<1
7.0
118.5
297.0
Mn
231.3
221.8
230.1
62.7
217.9
362.9
Cr
<5
322
173.6
128.7
241.9
<5
182
46.3
183.6
273.7
<50
<50
35.0
40.1
37.8
<50
<50
8.1
21.8
658.7
1283
1822
3048
3215
709.4
16277
17281
19615
Zn
158
5840
1205
Al
Fe
28530
77332
21062
35567
Ba
10777
1160
2223
13648
CU
Na
1188
525
249.9
1317
297.0
1409
35.7
1865
2099
3833.( 13490
18732
186
246.2
853.0
1479
3711
SPE
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
,
,
I
"'I
I
I
I
I
,
I
,
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
SG.BERA
HOLDING BASIN
,,
,,,
,,,
I
TERMINAL
EFFLUENT
SECTION
,
I
\
\
\
I
I
\
\
\
\
\
\
'---
---' '--" \
\_./
~
40
120
80
200
METRES
526
240
23 31~