Construction Methods - Viaduct: Elevated Viaduct Elevated Viaduct

CONSTRUCTION METHODS - VIADUCT
ELEVATED VIADUCT
Superstructure
- Precast Segmental

ELEVATED VIADUCT
Foundation and Substructure
Technical Feasibility Study on Elevated Suburban Rail Corridor

Mahalaxmi - Virar, Mumbai
CONSTRUCTION CONCEPT - VIADUCT

PROPOSED CONCEPT
Substructure with Multiple
p p
piles/mono p
pile foundation
H < 17m, D = 2.0 m

17m< H < 21m,, D = 2.5m
21m< H < 25m, D = 3.0m

PROPOSED CONCEPT
Special Bridges
-
Crossing of existing ROBs
Crossing of Tracks from east to west and vice versa
Bridge to cross Swami Vivekanand ROB (50 + 90 + 50)

Plan View

ELEVATED VIADUCT
Special Bridges
Segments Brought to site
Lifted and Erected in position by Segment Loader

ELEVATED STATIONS
Foundations and Piers constructed same as for viaduct
Station superstructure is constructed using self supporting form work
ARCHITECTURAL CONCEPT - VIADUCT

PROPOSED CONCEPT
P t l
Portals
-
Avoid infringement with existing tracks

PROPOSED CONCEPT
C til
Cantilevers
-
Avoid infringement with existing tracks

PROPOSED CONCEPT
Special Bridges
-
Crossing of existing ROBs
Crossing of Tracks from east to west and vice versa
Bridge to cross Swami Vivekanand ROB (50 + 90 + 50)

Plan View
Bridge Across Vasai Creek (South)
Bridge Across Vasai Creek (North)
LAND REQUIREMENT
Q
AND
AFFECTED STRUCTURES
SUMMARY OF LAND REQUIREMENT

SECTION
PRIVATE
LAND
(IN HAC.)
GOVT. LAND
GOVT
(IN HAC.)
TOTAL
(IN HAC.)
CCG - MAHALAXMI
MAHALAXMI BORIVALI
4.797
2.914
7.711
BORIVALI - VIRAR
5.475
12.918
18.393
TOTAL
10.272
15.832
26.034
Land for Depot(about 65 Hec.) is identified at north of Virar

The alignment is being reviewed to reduce land & structure acquisition.
SUMMARY OF AFFECTED STRUCTURES

SECTION
PRIVATE STRUCTURES
((IN SQM))
GOVT. STRUCTURES
((IN SQM))
GROUND
FLOOR
AREA
TOTAL
BUILDING
AREA
GROUND
FLOOR
AREA
TOTAL
BUILDING
AREA
CCG MAHALAXMI
MAHALAXMI
- BORIVALI
23666
40562
3517
3517
BORIVALI VIRAR
5120
12242
352
352
TOTAL
28786
52804
3869
3869
UTILITY DIVERSION
UTILITY OWNING AGENCIES

Sr. No. ORGANISATION/
DEPARTMENT
1.
BEST
2.
Reliance Energy Ltd
Area
UTILITY SERVICES
Churchgate -Mahim
Mahim - Bhayandar
Underground Electrical cables

Electrical cable, H.T Lines, LT Lines
Bhayandar-Virar
Electrical cables
4
4.
Maharastra State
Electricity Distribution
Company Limited
TATA Power Co Ltd
Ltd.
Mahalaxmi -Borivali
Borivali
Electrical cables,
cables H.V
H V power transmission Lines
5.
6.
7
MCGM- SWD
MCGM sewerage
MCGM water
t
Churchgate-Dahisar
Churchgate-Dahisar
Ch h t D hi
Churchgate-Dahisar
8.
MTNL
Churchgate-Dahisar
Storm water drainages

Sewerage pipe lines
W t mains
Water
i
, water
t pipe
i
li
lines,
pump houses
h
etc.
Telecommunication cables, junction boxes,
p
posts,, O.H. lines,, etc.
p
telephone
9.
BSNL
Mira - Bhayandar
10.
11.
12
GAIL
MGL
Western Railways
Mira - Bhayandar
Mira - Bhayandar
Churchgate-Virar
3.
Telecommunication cables, junction boxes,

telephone posts, O.H. lines, etc.
Gas pipe line
Gas pipe line
DC and AC Traction PSI (TSS, SP, SSP, AC
TSS) Electrical cables 22kV, 2.2 KV & Signaling
cable Location boxes,
cable,
boxes
GUIDELINES FOR UTILITY DIVERSION

The details of various utilities have been collected from
concerned organizations.
GUIDLINES FOR UTILITY DIVERSION
Utility services have to be kept operational during the entire construction period
and after completion of the project.
The elevated proposal does not pose much of a difficulty in negotiating the u/g
utility services, especially those running accros the alignment. The utilities
infringing at Pier location can be easility diverted away from the pipe cap location.
In case major utility is nunning along / across the alignement which cannot be
diverted or the diversion of which is difficult, time consuming and uneconomical the
spanning arrangement of the viaduct and layout of piles in the foundation will be
suitably adjusted.
For u/g section by cut & cover, the utilities are proposed to be maintained
temporarilty by replacing with CI/steel pipes and supporting them during const.
DETAILS OF EXISTING SEWER LINES

CHURCHGATE TO MAHALAXMI
S No.
No
From
Chainage
To
Chainage
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
247
865
900
925
1111
1190
1202
1615
2005
2630
875
905
937
1115
1195
1205
1625
Affected
Length
(in m)
2383
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
10
11
12
2405
2907
3015
2410
2912
3035
13
3035
4117
14
A
B
Dia/ Size
Position w.r.t.
w r t Alignment
Remark
900mm
900mm
900mm
900mm
900mm
900mm
900mm
900mm
900mm
Along from ch.2000 (2 lines running)

Across
Across
Across
Across
Across
Across
Across 2 Lines
Major junction at a distance 12m from CL of
proposed alignment on east side
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
22
22
20
900mm
900mm
900mm
Across
Across
Along alignment at distance 10m from CL of
proposed alignment on east side
B
B
B
1082
900mm
with variable distance min. -30m Max 113m from CL of proposed alignment on
east side
900mm
B
with variable distance min, - 30m max. 48m from CL of proposed alignment on east
side
Sewer lines running parallel/across the alignment are proposed to be diverted away from the alignment or supported
properly before work is taken in hand at each location.
Sewer lines running parallel/across the alignment is not proposed for diversion, but due care will be required to avoid
any damage to above lines.
lines
4090
4170
80
DETAILS OF EXISTING WATER PIPE LINES

CHURCHGATE TO MAHALAXMI
S No.
From
Chainage
To
Chainage
Affected
Length in (m)
-5
2600
2605
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
147
240
327
415
700
1465
1998
2008
2635
840
2081
140
616
2035
2900
27
265
11
12
2978
3167
2993
3268
15
101
13
14
3528
4161
3664
4782
136
621
15
5663
5675
12
A
B
Dia/ Size
Position w.r.t. Alignment
Remark
150mm, 250mm, 600mm, Both side East & West above

750mm & 800mm
alignment along the track
150mm
150mm
150mm
150mm
3000mm
3000mm
750mm
600mm
80mm, 750mm & 250mm
150mm & 250mm

80mm, 100mm, 150mm &
250mm
800mm & 900mm
2X1450mm, 600mm &
450mm
600mm
Across
Across
Across
Across
Across at depth of 50mtrs
Across at depth of 50mtrs
Across
Across
Across
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
Across
Along & Across
B
B
Along & Across

Along & Across
B
B
Across
lines
DETAILS OF EXISTING STORM WATER DRAINS

MAHALAXMI BORIVALI - VIRAR
S No.
From
Chainage
To
Chainage
6216
7200
7802
9005
4
5
6
7
A
B
Affected
Length in
(m)
984
Dia/ Size
Position w.r.t. Alignment
Remark
2 44m wide
2.44m
along,15m
along
15m away from centre
line - no infringement and
moves parallel at as max
41m away & min 23m
22
0.60m wide
9015
22
away 8.5m from CL of

proposed
alignment,
no
infringement Across
Across
9065
9070
22
5m wide
2x1m wide 2
Nos.
Across
9075
9800
11900
9080
9810
11975
22
22
75
0.75 m wide
5m wide
3m wide
B
B
B
Across
Across
Across
lines
DETAILS OF EXISTING SEWER LINES

S No.
From
Chainage.
To
Chainage.
Affected
Length in
(m)
1
1
1
2
7980
18710
22160
22465
7985
18715
22170
22475
22
22
22
22
600mm
400mm
400mm
750mm
Across
Across
Across
Across
3
4
5
6
7
24507
26018
27433
29340
34470
24530
26022
27437
29345
34475
23
22
22
22
22
900mm
700mm
900mm
1000mm
700mm
Along & Across

Across
Across
Across
Across
A
B
Dia/ Size
Position w.r.t.
Alignment
Remark
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
Sewer lines running parallel/across the alignment are proposed to be diverted away from the
alignment or supported properly before work is taken in hand at each location.
Sewer lines running parallel/across the alignment is not proposed for diversion, but due care
will be required
q
to avoid any
y damage
g to above lines.
DETAILS OF EXISTING WATER PIPE LINE

S No.
From Chainage
g
To Chainage
g
Affected
Length in (m)
5680
5705
25
600mm
Across
2
3
14316
14410
14376
14415
60
22
600mm
600mm
Across (Proposed)
Across
4
5
14543
15180
17015
14610
15185
17020
67
22
22
600mm
600mm
150mm
Across
Across
Across
17140
17155
22
600
600mm
A
Across
8
9
17222
17300
17234
17310
22
22
600mm
600mm
Across
Across
10
11
17610
19355
17835
19480
225
125
600mm
600mm
Across
Along /Across
12
13
20060
21540
20065
21545
22
22
600mm
1200mm
1350mm
14
23720
23925
205
900mm
15
16
17
24510
24526
30080
24515
24566
30260
22
40
180
900mm
1200mm
600mm 250mm
18
32500
32510
22
19
32562
32567
22
6
7
A
A
B
Dia/ Size
Position w.r.t.
Alignment
Across
& Across
Remark
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
Across
B
B
Discarded main
Tentative boundary of
micro tunnel
B
B
1200mm
Along (2 Main lines)
1200mm
Across (2 Main lines)
DETAILS OF EXISTING MGL PIPE LINES

S No.
From
Chainage
To
Chainage
Affected
Length in (m)
14400
14405
22
22500
22880
26370
Position w.r.t.
Alignment
Remark
12mm steel gas

pipe line
Across
380
12mm steel gas

pipe line
along &
across
26385
22
12mm steel gas

pipe line
along &
across
28375
28380
22
12mm steel gas

pipe line
across proposed
29141
29146
22
12mm steel gas

pipe line
across -
34740
34745
22
12mm steel gas

pipe line
across -
A
B
Dia / Size
Sewer lines running parallel/across the alignment are proposed to be diverted away from the alignment or
supported properly before work is taken in hand at each location.
Sewer lines running parallel/across the alignment is not proposed for diversion, but due care will be required
to avoid any damage to above lines.
TRAFFIC INTEGRATION
AND
DIVERSION
RIDERSHIP ASSESSMENT
Total traffic on the Corridor will remain samesame- with

with or
without elevated Corridor. New facility will only
provide redistribution of traffic on available mass
transit systems
Existing
g suburban system
y
is unable handle the
passenger volumes. Proposed Corridor will cater for
the capacity shortfall with better service
Proposed Elevated Corridor will offload a part of

passenger traffic from existing suburban system as
well
ll as road
d system
t
Main factors that will effect the shift

Parallel metro corridors being planned by MMRDA
Fare structure on elevated corridor
MASS TRANSIT SYSTEMS IN MUMBAI

DAHISAR
CHARKOP
MULUND
VERSOVA
SEEPZ
KANJURMARG
ANDHERI
GHATKOPAR
BKC
BANDRA
Chembur Railway Station
MANKHURD
Wadala Bridge
PRABHADEVI
SEWRI
Gadge Maharaj Chowk
Metro Phase I
Metro Phase II
Metro Phase III
HUTATMA CHAWK
COLABA
Monorail Phase I
Existing Western railway track
RIDERSHIP ASSESSMENT
Based on the Comprehensive Transportation Study,

Study MMRDA
MMRDAs
s
population/ employment projections, MRVC Study for feasibility of
AC services on Mumbai sub
sub--urban system, Western Railway Data
on traffic and limited primary
y passenger
g traffic surveys
y
It is estimated that about 50 % of first class and 20%

20% of second
class suburban rail passengers will shift to Elevated Corridor
About 10 % of road passengers are expected to shift
A growth rate of 2% p.a. for Church Gate Borivali section and 4%

p.a. upto Virar is taken based on MMRDA Plans
This provides a ridership figure of about 45,
45,000 PHPDT for Church
Gate Borivali and 33,
33,000 PHPDT for Borivali Virar section in 2039
The system has been planned with the design traffic load of 90
90,,000
PHPDT
INTERMODAL INTEGRATION & DISPERSAL

OBJECTIVES
To
facilitate efficient transfer and dispersal of

passengers
To
provide for effective inter-modal

inter modal interchange of
the passengers
To
integrate proposed systems entry/ exits with

those of existing suburban system and upcoming
transport infrastructure
PROPOSED MEASURES
Traffic Circulation Planning

Up-gradation/ widening of roads and walkways
Pedestrian cross-over facilities
New/ augmented bus/ IPT stands
Pl
Planned
d pick-up/
i k / drop-off
d
ff areas
Parking facilities
Additional measures such as integrated ticketing, dedicated feeder
services, introduction of modern low floor urban buses, etc. can also
h l
help

Entry/
y
Exits of Proposed
p
System
y
are integrated
g
with
those of existing Suburban, Metro and Skywalks
Details
worked out for Typical stations :

Dadar Andheri,
Dadar,
Andheri Goregaon and Mira Road
MCGM
doable
and Traffic Police agree that the schemes are
ROAD TRAFFIC DIVERSIONS
CONCEPT
The Corridor is p
planned to be constructed largely
g y within the Railway
y
Boundary
Preliminary traffic analysis has been done and conceptual traffic

diversion plans have been proposed to give confidence that the
proposal is doable
Traffic flow, Road Width, Pedestrian Flow, Traffic Management

measures may be different at the time of implementation and the
detailing will need to be done at the time of Detailed Project Report/
Implementation
Proposed
P
dC
Corridor
id alignment
li
t and
d construction
t ti methodology/
th d l
/ sequence
has been planned with a view to minimize affecting existing structures
and disrupting the traffic flow in the vicinity.

CONCEPT
At certain
t i locations,
l
ti
l d / properties
lands/
ti contiguous
ti
to
t Railway
R il
Land are proposed to be acquired for the Project. With this, the
need for traffic diversion will not arise
However, at several locations the construction of the proposed
Corridor will involve the partial or complete closure of existing
roads for varying amounts of time
Capacity of the alternative road networks has been assessed for
possible spare capacity to carry the diverted traffic
traffic.
Suitable Traffic Circulation Schemes have been suggested so as
not to exceed V/C Ratio of 1 on anyy road with the diverted traffic.
The bus stops/ IPT stands, if affected by the diversion, have
been suitably planned at alternate locations

TYPICAL CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE AND TRAFFIC MOVEMENT
ELEVATED SECTIONS
It is proposed to construct the elevated sections on a combination of

monopile and multiple pile foundations.
Thi will
This
ill iinvolve
l bl
blockage
k
off a minimum
i i
5 m wide
id strip
t i iin case off
monopile and 8 m in case of multiple pile foundations
An extra barricading
g width of 1.75 m on either side would be desirable
during night time for movement of equipments within the construction
zone, and the same shall be withdrawn during day time to maximize
available road width
At station, the total width to be blocked for construction would be about
26 m, to be blocked in one go. However, most of these would be over
Railway Land
Land, and only block part of the adjacent roads in some cases
cases.
ELEVATED SECTIONS
PROPOSED 9 M WIDTH OF ELEVATED DECK

TO BE BLOCKED ON SURFACE ALONG
ELEVATED SECTIONS
SAMPLE TRAFFIC DIVERSION FOR

CONSTRUCTION OF ELEVATED DECK AT
BANDRA MAIN ROAD
Capital Expenditure
&
Financial Analysis
CAPITAL COST ESTIMATE

S. No.
Item
1
2
3
4
5
5
6
7
8
9
Land and Structures

Civil Construction
P-Way
g
& Telecommunication
Signal
Traction & Power supply
Depot
p
Rolling Stock
Others misc. works
Traffic integration & dispersal facilities
Design,
g General Charges
g etc.
Gross Total(incl 5% contingency)
Amount in
Rs.Cr.
886.25
6804.40
542.26
1129.98
684.43
329.22
4485.00
658.11
607.20
860.45
17836.66
COST STREAM
Complete
p
Project
j
Cost - Rs. 20,654
,
Crores..
Includes Inflation during Construction.
Excludes Interest during Construction.
Investment accounted for in FIRR calculation: Additional Investment in Rolling stock in 2029-30 & 2039-40.
50% Replacement of S&T and 25% of Electrical assets (in
2037 38).
38)
O & M Cost (as on 2019-20) :- Rs.

Rs 461.04
461 04 Crores.
Crores
REVENUE STREAM
Fare box revenue :
Rs. 1392 Crores (as on 2019-20)
Advt. & Others(5% of fare box revenue): 69.60 crores.

Project FIRR without VGF & commercial development3.26%
(b d on MMRDA
(based
DA ffare structure))
S
Sources
off ffunding
di to iimprove FIRR
VGF
Commercial
C
i lD
Development
l
off airspace
i
& spareble
bl lland
d
parcels .
COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT
Above Existing Stations

Stations.
Ab
Above
El
Elevated
t d St
Stations.
ti n
S
Sparable
bl Land
d Parcels
l
COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT
Adequate land parcels and air spaces

will be made available for commercial
development to make the project
bankable.
bankable
THANKS

Construction Methods - Viaduct: Elevated Viaduct Elevated Viaduct

Transféré par

Informations du document

Titre original

Copyright

Formats disponibles

Partager ce document

Partager ou intégrer le document

Options de partage

Avez-vous trouvé ce document utile ?

Ce contenu est-il inapproprié ?

Droits d'auteur :

Formats disponibles

Construction Methods - Viaduct: Elevated Viaduct Elevated Viaduct

Transféré par

Droits d'auteur :

Formats disponibles

CONSTRUCTION METHODS - VIADUCT