Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
com/termfp
Fundamental analysis uses real, public data in the evaluation a security's value. Although most
analysts use fundamental analysis to value stocks, this method of valuation can be used for just
about any type of security. For example, an investor can perform fundamental analysis on a
bond's value by looking at economic factors such as interest rates and the overall state of the
economy. He can also look at information about the bond issuer, such as potential changes in
credit ratings.
The fundamentals include the qualitative and quantitative information that contributes to the
economic well-being and the subsequent financial valuation of a company, security or currency.
Analysts and investors analyze these fundamentals to develop an estimate as to whether the
underlying asset is considered a worthwhile investment. For businesses, information such as
revenue, earnings, assets, liabilities and growth are considered some of the fundamentals.
BREAKING DOWN 'Fundamentals'
In business and economics, the fundamentals represent the basic qualities and reported
information needed to analyze the health and stability of business or asset in question. This can
include topics within both the macroeconomic and microeconomic disciplines that are
considered standards for determining the financial values attributed to the assets.
Microeconomic fundamentals focus on the activities within smaller segments of the economy,
such as a particular market or sector. This can include issues of supply and demand within the
specified segment, as well as the theory of firms, theory of consumers and labor issues as related
to a particular industry.
fundamentals in company:
By looking at the economics of a business, such as the balance sheet, the income statement,
overall management and cash flow, investors are looking at a company's fundamentals, which
help determine the company's health as well as its growth prospects. A company with little debt
and a lot of cash is considered to have strong fundamentals.
Strong fundamentals suggest that a business has a viable framework or financial structure, while
those with weak fundamentals may have issues in the areas of debt obligation management, cost
control or overall organizational management. A business with strong fundamentals may be more
likely to survive negative events, such as economic recessions or depressions, than one with
weaker fundamentals and may indicate less risk should an investor consider purchasing securities
associated with the aforementioned businesses.
Each industry has differences in terms of its customer base, market share among firms, industrywide growth, competition, regulation and business cycles. Learning about how the industry
works will give an investor a deeper understanding of a company's financial health.
Customers
Some companies serve only a handful of customers, while others serve millions. In general, it's a
red flag (a negative) if a business relies on a small number of customers for a large portion of its
sales because the loss of each customer could dramatically affect revenues. For example, think of
a military supplier who has 100% of its sales with the U.S. government. One change in
government policy could potentially wipe out all of its sales. For this reason, companies will
always disclose in their 10-K if any one customer accounts for a majority of revenues.
Market Share
Understanding a company's present market share can tell volumes about the company's business.
The fact that a company possesses an 85% market share tells you that it is the largest player in its
market by far. Furthermore, this could also suggest that the company possesses some sort of
"economic moat," in other words, a competitive barrier serving to protect its current and future
earnings, along with its market share. Market share is important because of economies of scale.
When the firm is bigger than the rest of its rivals, it is in a better position to absorb the high fixed
costs of a capital-intensive industry.
Industry Growth
One way of examining a company's growth potential is to first examine whether the amount of
customers in the overall market will grow. This is crucial because without new customers, a
company has to steal market share in order to grow.
In some markets, there is zero or negative growth, a factor demanding careful consideration. For
example, a manufacturing company dedicated solely to creating audio compact cassettes might
have been very successful in the '70s, '80s and early '90s. However, that same company would
probably have a rough time now due to the advent of newer technologies, such as CDs and
MP3s. The current market for audio compact cassettes is only a fraction of what it was during the
peak of its popularity.
Competition
Simply looking at the number of competitors goes a long way in understanding the competitive
landscape for a company. Industries that have limited barriers to entry and a large number of
competing firms create a difficult operating environment for firms.
One of the biggest risks within a highly competitive industry is pricing power. This refers to the
ability of a supplier to increase prices and pass those costs on to customers. Companies operating
in industries with few alternatives have the ability to pass on costs to their customers. A great
example of this is Wal-Mart. They are so dominant in the retailing business, that Wal-Mart
practically sets the price for any of the suppliers wanting to do business with them. If you want
to sell to Wal-Mart, you have little, if any, pricing power.
Regulation
Certain industries are heavily regulated due to the importance or severity of the industry's
products and/or services. As important as some of these regulations are to the public, they can
drastically affect the attractiveness of a company for investment purposes.
In industries where one or two companies represent the entire industry for a region (such as
utility companies), governments usually specify how much profit each company can make. In
these instances, while there is the potential for sizable profits, they are limited due to regulation.
In other industries, regulation can play a less direct role in affecting industry pricing. For
example, the drug industry is one of most regulated industries. And for good reason - no one
wants an ineffective drug that causes deaths to reach the market. As a result, the U.S.Food and
Drug Administration (FDA) requires that new drugs must pass a series of clinical trials before
they can be sold and distributed to the general public. However, the consequence of all this
testing is that it usually takes several years and millions of dollars before a drug is approved.
Keep in mind that all these costs are above and beyond the millions that the drug company has
spent on research and development.
All in all, investors should always be on the lookout for regulations that could potentially have a
material impact upon a business' bottom line. Investors should keep these regulatory costs in
mind as they assess the potential risks and rewards of investing.
manages
the
funds
in
What fees can a portfolio manager charge from its clients for the
services rendered by him?
SEBI Portfolio Manager Regulations have not prescribed any scale of fee to
be charged by the portfolio manager to its clients.
However, the regulations provide that the portfolio manager shall charge a fee
as per the agreement with the client for rendering portfolio management
services. The fee so charged may be a fixed amount or a return based fee or
a combination of both. The portfolio manager shall take specific prior
permission from the client for charging such fees for each activity for which
service is rendered by the portfolio manager directly or indirectly (where such
service is outsourced).
14. Does SEBI approve any of the services offered by portfolio managers?
No. SEBI does not approve any of the services offered by the Portfolio
Manager. An investor has to invest in the services based on the terms and
conditions laid out in the disclosure document and the agreement between
the portfolio manager and the investor.
15. Does SEBI approve the disclosure document of the portfolio manager?
The Disclosure Document is neither approved nor disapproved by SEBI. SEBI
does not certify the accuracy or adequacy of the contents of the Disclosure
Document.
16. What are the rules governing services of a Portfolio Manager?
The services of a Portfolio Manager are governed by the agreement between
the portfolio manager and the investor. The agreement should cover the
minimum details as specified in the SEBI Portfolio Manager Regulations.
However, additional requirements can be specified by the Portfolio Manager
in the agreement with the client. Hence, an investor is advised to read the
agreement carefully before signing it.
During the major financial crisis beginning in late 2008, Citigroup suffered large losses in its
retained collateralized debt obligation exposure (loans that Citi underwrote but was not able to
sell), and had to be rescued by the U.S. federal government. They decided to sell or close "noncore" businesses in order to raise money. On January 13, 2009, Morgan Stanley and Citigroup
announced the merger of Smith Barney with Morgan Stanley's Global Wealth Management
Group, with Morgan Stanley paying $2.7 billion cash upfront to Citigroup for a 51% stake in the
joint venture. The joint venture operates as Morgan Stanley Smith Barney.[11] Morgan Stanley
itself was in a financially cash-strapped position like Citigroup during that time, but they were
helped by $9 billion investment from Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group for a 21% stake in
Morgan Stanley.
On June 1, 2009, Morgan Stanley and Citigroup Inc. announced they closed early on the launch
of their joint venture that combines Morgan Stanley's wealth management unit (including many
former Dean Witter assets) with Citi's Smith Barney brokerage division. The new venture, called
Morgan Stanley Smith Barney, was supposed to launch during the third quarter. The combined
entity generates about $14 billion in net revenue, has 18,500 financial advisers, 1,000 locations
worldwide and serves about 6.8 million households.[12]
Citigroup disclosed on September 17, 2009, they would sell their remaining shares in the group
to partner Morgan Stanley