Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
www.elsevier.com/locate/petrol
PII:
DOI:
Reference:
S0920-4105(15)00102-3
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2015.03.003
PETROL2984
To appear in:
ABSTRACT
Nano or micro-nano based materials have attracted a strong interest due to its attractive properties and they
have great potential for developing intelligent drilling fluid in petroleum industry. In this article, a novel hydrophobic
associated polymer based silica nanoparticles composite with core-shell structure which was mainly used for
developing intelligent drilling fluid additive for drilling ultra-deep well under ultra-high temperature, ultra-high
pressure and salinity, was prepared with Acrylamide, 2-Acrylamide-2-methylpro pane sulfonic acid, Maleic anhydride, Styrene and silica nanoparticles via inverse micro emulsion polymerization and sol-gel preparation, and
was characterized by particle size distribution, SEM, TEM ESEM and the influence law of comprehensive performance of water based drilling fluid and its mechanism influenced by novel hydrophobic associated polymer
based silica nanoparticles composite were studied too. Micro-model drilling fluid flooding and drilling fluid displacement experiment of core column were adopted to assess the plugging stability of micro-pores and micro-cracks and effect on wellbore stability. The experimental data showed that, the composite as a micro-nano
drilling fluid additive, possessed excellent properties such as thermal stability, rheology, fluid loss and lubricity.
Especially, it could plug the formation effectively and improve the pressure bearing capability of formation significantly.
KEYWORDS: Polymers; Drilling fluids; Composite materials; Microstructure; Thermal properties; Ultra-high
temperature
1. Introduction
As we all know that drilling fluid in the drilling process of oil and gas well drilling engineering can be seen as
the equivalent to the blood in the human body [1]. Drilling fluid is a typical coarse dispersion colloidal suspension
* Corresponding author at: College of Petroleum Engineering, China University of Petroleum (East China), Qingdao Shadong, 266580, China; Tel:+86 18561917201. E-mail addresses: maohui01@163.com.
system that contains a fluid phase, a solid phase and a chemical phase and commonly used water-based drilling
fluid is a dirty mixture of water, bentonite, viscosity increaser, fluid loss reducer, lubricants, often referred to as
mud [1,2] . Drilling fluid has many important functions and corresponding necessary properties. The principal
functions are to: (1) remove the cuttings away from under the bit and transport the cuttings from the bottom to the
surface; (2) form a thin, low-permeability filter cake which seals pores and other openings in formation penetrated
by the bit; (3) maintain a stable wellbore; (4) cool and lubricate the bit and the drill string; (5) bring information
back to the surface; (6) reduce friction between the drilling string and the side of the hole [3,4] and so on. Polymer
is a very important kind of drilling fluid additives with strong hydrophilicity and larger hydrodynamic volume after
hydration which can control the drilling fluid rheology and auxiliary drop filtration effectively. Synthetic polymer
chemistry has a significant contribution to oil and gas drilling engineering in high temperature and high pressure
applications [5-8]. Synthetic polymers were successfully formulated for deflocculating [9,10], fluid-loss-control
[11-15], viscosity increaser [16], adsorbent [17] and gel inhibition [18-19] at high temperature according its specific
characteristics and were proved to have a wide utility. With the increase of well depth thermal stability becomes
an important performance characteristics of polymers under ultra-high temperature and ultra-high pressure applications. But field application shows that it is often impossible to fulfill certain functional tasks that are essential
in challenging drilling and production environments using conventional macro type fluid additives due to their
inadequate physical, mechanical, chemical, thermal and environmental characteristics [20]. Therefore, the petroleum industry is looking for physically small, multi-functional, biologically degradable, thermally stable, environmentally friendly, novel polymers or natural products for designing intelligent drilling fluids to use virtually in all
areas of petroleum exploration and exploitation [21-23]. The intelligent drilling fluid can meet the borehole stability,
environment-friendly, reservoir protection at the same time, and can identify the different complex circumstances
down hole automatically while drilling and self-change its function to ensure the drilling engineering smoothly.
Fortunately, with the rapid development of nanotechnology, micro-nano materials make drilling fluid with multiple
functions simultaneously become possible and using micro-nano materials to prepare the high-performance intelligent drilling fluid has a greater potential [24-28]. According to the experimental results of Amanullah and Arfaj,
the newly developed nano based drilling fluid or micro-nano based drilling fluid produces suitable high and low
end rheological properties including gelling characteristics and thus expected to fulfill its functional task during
drilling and after cessation of drilling [20]. It is known that ultra-high temperature, high pressure (uHTHP)
drilling fluids and ultra-high temperature, low-pore pressure (uHTLP) drilling fluids are still quite a challenge
to drilling engineering. When bottomhole temperatures exceed 200
2
fluids can present a host of problems. Drilling fluids destabilize under such extreme conditions, possibly
causing wellbore instability, well control problems, and ultimately loss of the well. For example, drilling buried
hill hydrocarbon reservoir in offshore oilfield around Bohai Sea Bay Basin, China has often resulted in failure
to reach desires objectives. Bottom hole temperatures up to 220
fluid weights just to 1.04-1.1 g/cm3 equivalent, which belongs to the typical ultra-high temperature and
low-pore pressure reservoir, place severe limitations on the performance of drilling fluids and often contribute in failure to reach the desired drilling objectives. Polymers as viscosifying agent and filtrate reducer that
control rheological properties and fluid loss create major challenges for drilling fluid performance and stabil-
solids content and high fluid loss can become difficult to control under ultra-high temperature conditions.
Both of these issues are compounded when the ultra-high temperature is coupled with a requirement for low
fluid density. However, hydrophobic associated polymer with excellent temperature resistance ability, salt resistance ability and anti-pollution capacity, is expected to be used in deep and ultra-deep well drilling. While silica
nanoparticles with high surface energy, rigidity, dimensional stability and thermal stability, the use of nano fillers
for polymer matrix may be combined rigidity, dimensional stability and thermal stability of inorganic material with
toughness, processability and joint performance of polymer together to get polymer based nano-composites with
excellent properties. But the surface modification of inorganic materials such as silica nanoparticles, requires the
presence of functional groups on the surface of the particles capable of either being involved in polymerization
reaction or reacting with terminal groups of preformed polymers [29-31]. Several strategies have been reported
for grafting polymer chains to silica particles [32-35]. In this paper, a novel hydrophobic associated polymer based
nano-silica composite with core-shell structure, mainly used for developing intelligent drilling fluid additive for
drilling ultra-deep well under ultra-high temperature, ultra-high pressure and salinity, was prepared with Acrylamide (Am), 2-Acrylamide-2-methylpro pane sulfonic acid (AMPS), Maleic anhydride (MA), Styrene (St) and nano-silica via inverse micro emulsion polymerization and sol-gel preparation.
2. Experimental
2.1 Materials
Silica nanoparticles (AEROSIL 200, Germany) with an average particle size (Dp) of 12 nm and a specific
surface area of 200 m2/g, were used as received. Acrylamide (AM), Styrene (ST), and Maleic Anhydride (MA)
were purchased from Sinopharm Chemical Reagent Co. Ltd. and used without further purification. Tetraethyl orthosilicate (TEOS), 2-Acrylamide-2-methylpro panesulfonic acid (AMPS) was purchased from Aladdin Industrial
3
Corporation and used without further purification. Potassium persulfate (K2S2O8), sodium hydrogen sulfite
(NaHSO3), Span 80, and OP-10 were all purchased from Sinopharm Chemical Reagent Co. Ltd. and used without
further purification and with a purity>99 wt.%. Deionized water was used throughout the experiments.
associated
polymer
P(AM-NaAMPS-MA-b-St)
was
prepared
by
Acrylamide
(AM),
2-Acrylamide-2-methylpro pane sulfonic acid (AMPS), Maleic anhydride (MA) and Styrene (St) via inverse micro
emulsion polymerization. In brief, 0.06 mol AMPS and 0.01 mol MA were dissolved into 120 mL deionized water,
nized water to control the total concentration at 15 wt.%. 3 g span-80 and 1 g OP-10 were also added. Then the
mixture was loaded into a reaction flask. After the above steps, this mixed solution was stirred in high speed and
and deoxygenated
protected by nitrogen for 30min. 0.07 g K2S2O8 was added dropwise and heated up to 90
with nitrogen for 4-5 h, then cooled the reactor to 60
prepared via sol-gel preparation. Adding a certain amount of tetraethyl orthosilicate (TEOS) and Silica nanoparticles into the reaction flask react 2-3 h. Finally, the composite was obtained by filtering, washing and drying.
2.3 Characterization
The molecular structure of composite materials was characterized by Infrared spectra (IR) were recorded
using a Nicolet 6700 FT-IR spectrometer (NEXUS, USA).Thermo gravimetric analysis (TGA) of the SDFL was
performed on a SDT Q600 instrument (TA Instruments, USA). The sample was heated at a rate of 5
/min under
N2 flow (100 mL/min). The particle size distribution and specific surface area of micro-nano composites were
determined by ultra-high speed intelligent laser diffraction particle size analyzer delivers (Malvern Mastersizer
3000, Britain). Scanning electron microscopy (SEM, Hitachi S4800, Japan), transmission electron microscopy
(TEM, Hitachi JEM-2100UHR, Japan) and environmental scanning electron microscope (ESEM, Quanta 450, FEI)
were used to study the morphology, structure and in situ surface topography of wet samples of the composite.
The viscosity of the drilling fluid was tested with six-speed rotational viscometer (ZNN-D6, Qingdao). The rheological and filtration test procedure were executed by the American Petroleum Institute drilling fluid indoor test
criteria [36].
2.4 Drilling fluid preparation and property test
The fresh water-based drilling fluid was made up by water, bentonite and Na2CO3 (400:16:0.8 ratio by weight),
and then pre-hydrated for 24h. The saturated NaCl-based drilling fluid was prepared by adding saturated NaCl
into fresh water-based drilling fluid, and then pre-hydrated for 24h.
In this study, the synthetic composite materials were added into the fresh water based slurry at 4 wt.% by
stiring in high speed for 20min and maintaining at indoor environment for 24h, or there was another way that colling the composite materials after hot rolled aging for 16h under the set temperature and then stirred in high
speed for 20min to get the same objective. According to drilling fluid test program SY/T56211993 to test the
drilling fluid rheological parameter. The reading value of viscometer () at different rotational speed (600 r/min
and 300 r/min) was respectively measured by the six-speed rotational viscometer. The equation (1) ~ (3) were
used to calculating the apparent viscosity (AV), plastic viscosity (PV) and yield value (YP) [1].
AV = 600 / 2
(1)
PV = 600 - 300
(2)
YP = 0.511(300 PV )
(3)
for 16 h. The
sample in the jar should be washed with water on a 40 mesh sifter and dried for 4 h at 105
in a drying oven.
Then shale weight ( m ) was recorded after the temperature dropped to room temperature. The shale rolling recovery rate ( R ) was calculated using the equation (4):
(4)
R = m / 50
Where R is the shale rolling recovery rate (%); m is the shale weight after rolling at 77
for 16 h (mm).
The bigger the shale recovery rate is, the better the inhibition performance of the test liquid.
2.5.2 Shale swelling experiment
The shale samples were pulverized to make all powder through 100 mesh sieve, and dried to constant weight
at 105
, and then cooled to room temperature. Compacting the powder at certain pressure (4MPa) and mea-
H1
(mm) of the compacted sample. Then, the sample was placed in a shale expansion
instrument to make a direct contact with the test liquid and to determine the linear expansive capacity over a
specified period. The ending linear height
H2
shale linear swelling rate (P). The shale linear swelling rate (P) was calculated using the equation (5):
P=
Where
H 2 H1
100%
H1
(5)
P is the shale linear swelling rate (%); H1 and H 2 are the initial height and the ending linear
( ) was calculated as equation (5); (4) Put the core into the gripper, control the confining pressure of 3.5MPa and
then fresh water-based drilling fluid, SDFL based drilling fluid and deionized water were used for displacement
experiment. (5) Record the exit pressure and entrance pressure by digital collection system. The differential
pressure of exit pressure and entrance pressure represent the plugging effect for different drilling fluid. The resistance factor and the residual resistance factor were calculated using the equation (6) and (7):
= ( M 2 M1 ) /
Where
(5)
Res = Pp / Pw
(6)
Rres = Ps / Pw
(7)
is core porosity (%); M 1 and M 2 are the mass of the core before and after it was saturated,
respectively (g);
Ps
and
and
Res
Rres
Pw
flooding pressure and fresh water-based mud flooding pressure, respectively (MPa).
Core 1
Core 2
length (cm)
7.41
7.41
radius (cm)
2.5
2.5
15
15
32
34
66.97
67.56
74.79
75.12
), the mass fraction of initiator (%), reaction monomer concentration (%) and mo8
nomer molar ratio. The orthogonal test was designed of 5 factors and 4 levels. Factors and levels of orthogonal
test were showed in the Table 2.
Table 2 The factors and the level of orthogonal test
level
pH
temperature
(
mass fraction
reaction monomer
of initiator
concentration
(%)
(%)
[C]
[D]
[A]
[B]
[E]
40
0.1
10
5:3:1:1:1
50
0.2
15
5:3.25:0.75:1:1
60
0.3
20
5:2.75:1.25:1:1
70
0.4
25
5:2.5:1.5:1:1
The orthogonal test table of synthesis of SDFL was showed in Table 3. Sixteen kinds of micro-nano filtration reducing agent composites were synthetized according to design conditions. The rheological characteristic
at room temperature and HTHP filter loss at 180
spectively. The test drilling fluid formulation was fresh water base mud + synthetic micro-nano filtration (1%) +
Na2SO3 (0.5%). In drilling engineering, in order to break rock effectively at high shear rate and suspend cuttings
effectively at low shear rate, the required yield point to plastic viscosity ratio (0/P) of drilling fluid is high, which
shows the strength of drilling fluid shear diluted characteristics. The bigger the yield point to plastic viscosity
ratio of drilling fluid is, the better the drilling fluid thixotropy. Because the results of orthogonal test were related
to the optimization of rheology and HTHP filtration effect, so when the fluid loss reducing capacity and regulating rheological ability of the synthetic polymer / nanoparticles micro-nano filtration were deposed, 0/p and
FLHTHP should be standardized firstly, thus, denoted 0/p and FLHTHP by X and Y, and then the same weight was
given to the two evaluation indexes, H is a comprehensive evaluation index, and H=X-Y. The bigger the H is,
the better the rheology, and the more ideal fluid loss effect.
Table 3 The orthogonal test results of SDFL
p
mPas
Pa
E1
18
0.28
D2
E2
21
C3
D3
E3
25
C4
D4
E4
38
No.
A1
B1
C1
D1
A1
B2
C2
A1
B3
A1
B4
0/p
FLHTHP
25
0.42
0.40
0.017
0.33
23
0.63
0.30
0.325
8.5
0.34
20.8
0.67
0.19
0.477
0.18
35.5
0.00
0.93
-0.925
mL
A2
B1
C2
D3
E4
22
0.27
33
0.38
0.80
-0.425
A2
B2
C1
D4
E3
26
0.19
26.2
0.04
0.46
-0.418
A2
B3
C4
D1
E2
45
9.2
0.20
21
0.08
0.20
-0.117
A2
B4
C3
D2
E1
31
13
0.42
17
1.00
0.00
1.000
A3
B1
C3
D4
E2
36
12
0.33
18.2
0.63
0.06
0.565
10
A3
B2
C4
D3
E1
33.5
11
0.33
22.5
0.63
0.28
0.350
11
A3
B3
C1
D2
E4
24.5
0.29
34
0.46
0.85
-0.392
12
A3
B4
C2
D1
E3
28
0.29
37
0.46
1.00
-0.542
13
A4
B1
C2
D2
E3
19
0.26
27
0.33
0.50
-0.167
14
A4
B2
C1
D1
E4
21
0.19
34.5
0.04
0.88
-0.833
15
A4
B3
C4
D4
E1
23.5
0.30
20.2
0.50
0.16
0.340
16
A4
B4
C3
D3
E2
31.5
0.19
25.8
0.04
0.44
-0.398
K1
-0.027
-0.002
-0.407
-0.369
0.427
K2
0.010
-0.144
-0.202
0.192
0.094
K3
-0.005
0.077
0.411
0.001
-0.163
K4
-0.265
-0.216
-0.088
-0.110
-0.644
0.275
0.293
0.818
0.560
1.070
A2
B3
C3
D2
E1
Optimal
Level
As can be seen the orthogonal analysis range results from Table 3, influence factors sequence of comprehensive effect of polymerization reaction product is that monomer molar ratio > initiator mass fraction >
reacting monomer concentration > temperature > pH value. From the mean analysis results ,the optimum
synthesis condition is A2, B3, C3, D2, E1, While pH value is 7, temperature is 60
is 0.3 % (w/w), monomer concentration is 15 % (w/v), the monomer molar ratio of AM:AMPS:MA:ST:SiO2 is
5:3:1:1:1.
3.2 Micro-morphology characterization
3.2.1 FT-IR analysis
As can be seen the infrared spectra test results from Figure 4, the product is with the primary / secondary
amides C=O bond stretching vibration nearby 1669.77 cm-1, -NH2 stretching vibration nearby 3346.64 cm-1 ,
-1
C=O bond stretching vibration in AMPS nearby 1206.65 cm , Asymmetric stretching vibration of S=O bond
nearby 1185.35 cm-1, symmetric stretching vibration of -CH3 nearby 2870.3 cm-1. The characteristic absorption
peaks of the benzene ring were 1615.83 cm-1 and 1455.25 cm-1. C-H bending vibration at benzene ring was
10
667.99 cm-1. The stretch vibration absorption spectra of the two carbonyls (C=O) on anhydride (1860 ~ 1800
-1
-1
cm and1800 ~ 1740 cm ) was not existent in the spectrum, that showed maleic anhydride in the product had
been hydrolyzed into carboxyl [40]. The absorption peaks of stretching vibration of -OH on -COOH were
2927.13 cm-1 and 2951.76 cm-1. The absorption peak of stretching vibration of -C-O on -COOH was 1402 cm-1,
-1
for absorption peak, the absorption peak of stretching vibration of Si-O-C bond was 1068.41 cm . Stretching
-1
-1
vibration peak of vinyl C=C didnt not appear 1000 cm ~ 900 cm interval. It Indicated that the polymerization
was complete, there was no residual monomer. The FTIR results showed that, molecular chains were with to
all the comonomer links.
100
90
80
Transmittance (%)
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
4000
3500
3000
2500
2000
1500
1000
500
-1
wavelength (cm )
11
Table 4 The results of diameter distribution and specific surface area of Polymer/Nano-silica
Analysis Items
Results
Scattering Model
Mie
Unit
12
Analysis Items
Results
Unit
Concentration
0.0010%
Dispersant
Water
Consistency
0.257
Particle Absorption
0.100
22370
m /kg
Weighted Residual
11.72%
Span
0.835
1.572
D(10)
0.185
1.330
D(50)
0.284
Shading Degree
7.09%
D(90)
0.422
D[3,2]
0.268
D[4,3]
0.295
. The second degradation stage occurred in the range of 290 320 . The third decomposition stage began at 320 and ended at 420
440 .The fourth stage became smooth at temperatures higher than 440 C. Here, the first stage corres-
ponded to the decomposition of water and other volatile substances in SDFL, the second stage corresponded
to the decomposition of amide and carboxyl groups, the third stage to the degradation of sulfonic groups, and
the fourth stage to the decomposition of the polymer backbone. In the range of room temperature to 500
total weight loss rate was 60% showed that the SDFL itself has a good characteristics of temperature resistance.
100
90
80
70
TG (%)
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
0
50
100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500 550 600 650
Temperatue ( )
racteristic of the fresh water based drilling fluid (Formulation A) after aging under 230 . It can be seen that the
filtrate volume decreased with the increase of the SDFL concentration after the aging test. When the SDFL
13
concentration was high enough (e.g., 0.5% for water based drilling fluid), the filtrate properties changed slowly.
This illustrated that SDFL was a very efficient fluidloss reducer. Whats more, the apparent viscosity (AV),
plastic viscosity (PV), yield point (YP) increased with the increase of the SDFL concentration after the aging
test, which means the strength of drilling fluid shear diluted characteristics became better and the drilling fluid
thixotropy changed well and this was good for breaking rock effectively at high shear rate and suspending cuttings effectively at low shear rate.
PV
YP
FLAPI
FLHTHP
mPas
mPas
Pa
mL
mL
Formulation A
0.14
26
52
12
10
0.20
18
46
16
13
0.23
15
37
21.5
16
5.5
0.34
11.6
26
27.5
20
7.5
0.38
9.2
24
32
21
11
0.52
5.4
21.5
46
30
16
0.53
4.8
18
Formula
YP/PV
Table 6 lists the influence of SDFL on apparent viscosity(AV), plastic viscosity(PV), yield point(YP), filtration loss(FLAPI) , HTHP filtration loss(FLHTHP) and Lubrication coefficient of the fresh water-based drilling fluid
(Formulation A) and saturated NaCl-based drilling fluid (Formulation B) after aging under 230
. As indicated in
Table.1, after adding SDFL, drilling fluids displayed a largely increase in AV, PV, YP, and a significant decrease
in FL and lubrication coefficient. The drilling fluid systems set temperature stability, salt tolerance, perfect
rheological properties, good lubricity, and fluid loss control properties in one, and the function of drilling fluids
showed significant pluralism. The excellent properties of micro-nano-based drilling fluid were due to the unique
molecular design of SDFL which polymer matrix with high degree branching structure had big steric hindrance
and micro-cross-linked structure which combined rigidity and thermal stability of nano-silica with characteristics
of hydrophobic associating polymers together. The polymer matrix could provide viscosity at high temperature
and the micro-nanoparticles could cause that the entropy of SDFL has a much higher contribution to the specific heat than that of conventional drilling fluid agents, thereby, when the micro-nanoparticles were circulated
14
into the bottom, more heat could be absorbed to improve the performance of the other systems of drilling fluids.
Besides, Si-OH at the surface of the composite could react with Si-OH at the surface of clay by polycondensation
and produce strong chemical adsorption which resulted in thickening hydration membrane and increas-
ing hydration membrane repulsive force at high temperature and high pressure [41]. Thus, the flocculation
among clay particles at high temperature and high pressure was prevented effectively to keep a reasonable
particle distribution in drilling fluid and form a thin-dense mud cake. Meanwhile, the ultrafine spherical micro-nano particles may form an ultrathin bed similar to the spherical bearing type surface between the pipe and
the wellbore and thereby can let easy sliding of the drill string along the spherical bearing surface.
Table 6 The effect of SDFL on rheological properties, filtration behaviors and lubrication properties of different
drilling fluids formulations after thermal aging tests under 230
/16h.
Properties
Drilling fluid combination
AV
PV
YP
FLAPI
FLHTHP
Lubrication
(mPas)
(mPas)
(Pa)
(mL)
(mL)
coefficient
Formulation A
7.5
6.0
1.5
27.0
51.8
0.426
Formulation A + 0.5%SDFL
32
21
11
5.4
21.5
0.028
Formulation B
5.0
4.0
1.0
32.0
63.5
0.438
Formulation B + 0.8%SDFL
26.0
21.0
5.0
8.2
22.0
0.057
drilling fluid and salt-water drilling fluid before and after aging under 230 , respectively. It can be seen that the
API filtrate volume decreased significantly with the increase of the SDFL concentration before or after the aging
test under ultra-high temperature. The API filtrate volume after the aging test was larger than that before the
aging test, meaning that the elevated temperature could raise permeability of the filter cake and spoil a part of
the mud gel structure [13]. However, if aged at elevated ultra-high temperatures of 230C, even if some clay
aggregation occurred in drilling fluid system, the residual clay network was kept, thus the API filtrate volumes of
fresh water based drilling fluid and salt-water based drilling fluid were still smaller than 5 mL and 15 mL, respectively. When the novel hydrophobic associated polymer based nano-silica composite with core-shell
structure concentration was high enough (e.g., 1.0% for fresh water based drilling fluid and 1.2% for salt-water
15
based drilling fluid), the API filtrate properties changed very slowly. And this illustrated that SDFL was a very
efficient fluid loss reducer.
35
30
before thermal aging test
after thermal aging test
FL (mL)
25
20
15
10
5
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1.0
1.1
1.2
Figure 8 The effect of SDFL concentration on the filtrate volume of fresh-water drilling fluid (before and after
the aging test).
100
90
80
70
FL (mL)
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1.0
1.1
1.2
1.3
Figure 9 The effect of SDFL concentration on the filtrate volume of salt-water drilling fluid (before and after the
aging test).
3.5 Temperature resistant capacity
Filtration properties and rheology characteristics test results of SDFL in fresh water based drilling fluid
aging after 16 h at different temperature was shown in Table 7. From Table 7, one can see that 1% SDFL
concentration could make the drilling fluid filtrate loss decreased obviously, especially the HTHP filtrate volume,
and the HTHP filtrate volume was only 16 mL after aging at 220
property of drilling fluid system was improved due to the increase of yield point to plastic viscosity ratio. High
HTHP filtration and high temperature rheological property showed that SDFL had excellent thermal stability
which could resist temperature up to 220
experimental
16
AV
PV
YP
FLAPI
FLHTHP
conditions
/16h
210/16h
220/16h
230/16h
200
mPas
mPas
Pa
mL
mL
7.5
1.5
27
51.8
31
23
7.3
20.5
42
31
11
5.4
16
46
30
16
4.8
18
than that of HPAM in aqueous solution. This is because the novel synthetic polymers not only introduced inorganic silica nanoparticles and anionic sulfonate groups extremely insensitive to salt, but also introduced a
little bit of hydrophobic group (PSt) in hydrophilic macro chain [42]. Due to the high charge density of sulfonic
acid groups in AMPS and strong hydration, it is conducive to improve the water solubility behavior of the copolymer. Meanwhile, the two bond and three strongly electronegative O atoms in molecule shared a negative
charge which made the sulfonic acid group stable [41], so it is insensitive to the cation in the drilling fluid sys2+
ity declined, but the solvent polarity enhanced with the increase of content of inorganic salt ions .Thus it is more
conducive to the association of hydrophobic associating polymer hydrophobic chain. The hydrodynamic radius
of polymer molecular became larger and the solution apparent viscosity increased slowly when the ion shielding effect ended.
17
30.0
27.5
HPAM
FLR-1
25.0
22.5
AV (mPa.s)
20.0
17.5
15.0
12.5
10.0
7.5
5.0
2.5
0.0
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
Figure 10 The apparent viscosity of 0.5% polymer aqueous solution under different concentration of CaCl2
3.7 Hydrophobic associating property
From Figure 11, at the same concentration (1%) of SDFL, the plastic viscosity (PV) and yield point(YP) of
SDFL aqueous solution were first increase, then the change trend of decrease with the increase of the content
of styrene link in molecular chain. But the API filtrate volume showed the tendency of first decrease, and then
increase. This is because when the styrene content is low, the association of the hydrophobic block segment is
based on intramolecular association which led molecular chain curling up and small hydrodynamics radius of
molecular chain. Thus the copolymer solution viscosity is smaller. When styrene content increases, the hydrophobic block link becomes longer, the hydrophobic association between big macromolecular chain enhances, hydrodynamic radius becomes bigger, and viscosity increases gradually. When the hydrophobic block
segment content continues to increase, styrene hydrophobic block its association trend becomes large, while
the association between the macromolecular chain is weakened. Therefore, the solution viscosity decreases
with the increase of the content of styrene link.
35.0
32.5
PV(mPas)
YP(Pa)
API(mL)
30.0
27.5
25.0
22.5
20.0
17.5
15.0
12.5
10.0
7.5
5.0
2.5
0.0
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
1.2
1.4
1.6
1.8
2.0
St (mol.%)
18
The ESEM images of the 0.3% SDFL in aqueous solution and 1.0% NaCl solution were shown in Figure
12. We can see that, the aqueous solution and 1.0% NaCl solution both emerged micro crosslinking properties
after silica nanoparticles introduced into the polymer, but the network structure of SDFL in aqueous solution
was stronger and the grid structure was closer. This is determined by the unique molecular conformation of
hydrophobic associating polymer connecting silica nanoparticles as shown in Figure 13. Therefore, the unique
molecular structure of the polymer based silica nanoparticles and its micro crosslinking form in solution could
keep the drilling liquid viscosity effectively, and a small amount of SDFL added to water-based drilling fluids
could greatly increases the viscosity of the drilling fluid, which served to reduce the amount of fluid filtration.
Figure 12 ESEM images of 0.3%SDFL in aqueous solution and 1.0% NaCl solution
NH2
O=C
OH
SiO2
HO
O
O= C
NaO3S
C=O
O
HO
NH
SO3Na
C =O
O= C
O=C
NH
OH
O
C =O
C=O
NH2
19
under 230
. The drilling fluid system was fresh water based drilling fluid + 0.3% SDFL + 0.1% FA367 + 3%
20
100
94
90
80
71
70
60
55.2
50
40
30
20
24
15.6
9.6
10
9.8
2.3
0
Water
5%KCl
0.5%NW-1
0.5%NPC
was shown as Figure 16. From Figure 16, we can see that extreme pressure
lubrication coefficient of the fresh water based drilling fluid decreases gradually with the SDFL amount increased. When the mass fraction of SDFL is 0.5%, the reduction rate of extreme pressure lubricating coefficient of the fresh water based drilling fluid could reach to 93.4%, which indicated that SDFL polymer based
silica nanoparticles composite could increase the drilling fluid system lubrication effectively.
21
100
0.45
90
0.40
80
0.35
70
0.30
60
0.25
lubricating coefficient
reduction rate of lubricating coefficient
50
0.20
40
0.15
30
0.10
20
0.05
10
0.00
lubricating coefficient
0.50
0
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
concentration of FLR-1 (%)
0.4
0.5
Figure 16 The effects of extreme pressure lubricating coefficient of water based drilling fluid by SDFL concentration
In the extended reach well and horizontal well drilling engineering, rock cuttings carrying at horizontal
section and cuttings bed formation avoiding are serious challenges faced by drilling fluid. Taking the advantage
of the characteristics of silica nanoparticles such as larger surface area, higher surface energy, ultrafine size
and rigid, combining with the unique properties of polymer, SDFL polymer based silica nanoparticles material
adding to the drilling liquid could quickly form a weak gel system which was conducive to clean cuttings bed
and carrying cuttings. On the other hand, micro nano particles dispersed in drilling fluid would adsorb on the
metal and clay surface quickly and effectively, due to the rigidity, dimensional stability and thermal stability of
inorganic silica nanoparticles, a spherical surface lubricating film similar to a ball bearing could be formed between drilling string and borehole by the existence of SDFL composite micro nano materials. The lubricating
film formed on the friction surface was relatively stable and of high intensity, which would significantly reduce
the friction between drilling string and borehole during oil and gas drilling process and was benefit to the sliding
between drill stem and well bore. Whats more, rotary torque and tripping resistance was decreased, bit balling
was weakened and a thin and dense mud cake was formed, as shown in figure 17.
22
(a)
(b)
Figure 17 SEM images of mud cake surface morphology, (a) SEM image of the fresh water based mud cake
surface morphology after natural air drying, (b) SEM image of the SDFL based mud cake surface morphology
after natural air drying
23
3.5
3.5
3.0
3.0
2.5
2.5
2.0
2.0
1.5
1.5
1.0
1.0
0.5
0.5
0.0
12
0.0
P2-P1(MPa)
0.3
0.2
P2-P1(MPa)
0.4
0.1
0.0
0
10
Injection volume
24
parameters
0.1
3.2
2.5
resistance factor
32
27
(a)
(b)
Figure 19 Plugging mechanisms of micro-pores and micro-cracks by SDFL (a) Self-assembly morphology of
SDFL in dilute aqueous solution; (b) thin and dense mud cake.
To investigate the plugging mechanisms of micro-pores and micro-cracks and wellbore stability mechanisms after different drilling fluid drive, two flooding tests were conducted in micro-models. A micro-model
test of SDFL based drilling fluid drive was first conducted; micro-model images at a certain pressure are shown
in Figure 20 (b), (d) and (e). And then a micro-model test of fresh water based drilling fluid drive was conducted;
micro-model images at a certain pressure are shown in Figure 20 (c) and (f). Figure 20 (a) was the micro-model
image before flood drive. The red arrow indicates the direction of drilling fluid displacement experiment of micro-model test. From Figure 20 (b) and (c), we can see that there were two plugging states during the drilling
fluid drive process. The fresh water based drilling fluid had a poor plugging ability when it was driven at a certain pressure. The fresh water based drilling fluid got into the micro pores and micro cracks along the displacement direction and finally passed through the micro-model, and the micro pores and micro cracks was
saturated by fresh water based drilling fluid. However, the SDFL based drilling fluid had a good plugging ability.
The displacement that SDFL based drilling fluid got into the micro pores and micro cracks along the dis25
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
(e)
(f)
Figure 20 Microscopic images for SDFL based drilling fluid flooding and fresh water based drilling fluid
flooding: (a) the micro-model
model image before flood drive; (b)SDFL based drilling fluid drive; (c) fresh water based
drilling fluid drive; (d) the boundary of the micro-model
micro
after based drilling fluid flooding;; (e) the center section
of the micro-model after SDFLbased
based drilling fluid flooding;
flooding; (f) the center section of the micro
micro-model after fresh
water based drilling fluid flooding.
26
(1) Keep the liquid phase viscosity effectively under high-temperature and high-pressure environment
Firstly, due to the higher branched degree structures of the AMPS and larger steric hindrance, the main
chain rigidity increased which played a certain role to raise the temperature resistance of the copolymer. Secondly, the existence of styrene hydrophobic chain in synthetic SDFL filtrate loss reducer molecules in the hydrophobic chain made the solvent hydrophobic association, and the process was endothermic, high temperature was benefit to the association between copolymer molecules which lead to viscosity increased. Thirdly,
high specific surface area of micro nano particles could lead to more contributions to the specific heat given by
entropy of the SDFL than that of conventional drilling fluid. Therefore, SDFL has a much higher specific heat
than the conventional drilling fluid loss agent. When drilling fluid circulated with micro nano particles into the
bottom, more heat could be absorbed than conventional drilling fluid additives which improved performance of
drilling fluid system of other additives to a certain extent. Thereby it could increase the drilling fluid system
temperature resistance. At last, rigidity and thermal stability of silica could combine with the properties of hydrophobic associating copolymers by introducing inorganic silica nanoparticles. The copolymer was with micro
crosslinking structure and significant thermal stability. Thus, the unique molecular structure of the polymer
27
based silica nanoparticles and its micro crosslinking form in solution could keep the drilling liquid viscosity effectively at high temperature and high pressure so that it could play a role in reducing the amount of fluid loss.
Si
Si
O
O
O
O
Si
Si
Si
Si
Si
OH
Al
Al
Al
Al
Al
O
OH
Si
Si
O
O
SiO2
C=O
NH
O
O
Si
O
NH
O
O
O
Si
OH
Si
Al
Al
Al
Al
Al
Al
Si
Si
Si
Si
O
O
O
O
O
O
C =O
O= C
O=C
Si
NaO3S
O
O
OH
HO
NaO3S
Al
Si
Si
O
O
O
O
Si
Si
O
O
O
O
Si
Si
O
O
matched micro pore and micro cracks instantly and form an isolation layer. At the same time, through the autonomous assembling of micro nanoparticles SDFL in aqueous solution bridging and cross-linking effect between different micro nanoparticles in SDFL, also could plug the micro pores and micro cracks larger than its
volume. So firmly and dense multistage network structure was formed in a relatively short period of time by the
bridging and crosslinking effect at the new open formation. Secondly, as the extension of the non-polar part of
SDFL molecules, other polar molecules like water molecule was very hard to go through the membrane composed of nonpolar molecules, thus thick and dense mud cake was formed [43] and pressure bearing capacity
of formation was effectively improved, thereby filtration was reduced under the high temperature and high
pressure.
5. Conclusions
A novel hydrophobic associated polymer based silica nanoparticles composite with core-shell structure
which was mainly used for developing smart drilling fluid additive for drilling ultra-deep well under ultra-high
temperature, ultra-high pressure and salinity, was prepared with Acrylamide, 2-Acrylamide-2-methylpro pane
sulfonic acid, Maleic anhydride, Styrene and silica nanoparticles via inverse micro emulsion polymerization and
sol-gel preparation. Its particle distribution ranged from 280-320 nm with micro-cross-linked property in
aqueous solution and the new synthesized filtrate reducer has a more ideal filtrate reduction property, thermal
stability, rheology, and lubricity, especially HTHP filtrate reduction. HTHP filter loss of 200
mL. Besides, it could improve the rheological properties of drilling fluid system and also has a better saline-alkaline tolerance. the experiment results of micro-model drilling fluid flooding and drilling fluid displacement experiment of core column showed that the composite as a micro-nano drilling fluid additive, it could plug
the formation effectively and improve the pressure bearing capability of formation significantly, isolate the interaction between the drilling fluid and the formation fluid made it beneficial to stabilize the borehole and protect
the reservoir. And the excellent performance of the composite acting on drilling fluid roots in both combining the
rigidity, thermal stability and dimensional stability of silica nanoparticles with characteristics of hydrophobic
associated polymer together and the molecular structure design concept of micro-cross-linked structure.
Acknowledgments
This work is supported by Natural Science Foundation of China (Project Nos. 51474235, 51474236), the
National Science and Technology Major Project of China (No.2011ZX05021-004), Postdoctoral Innovative
Project Foundation of Shandong Province (No.201303060), Science and Technology Major Project of CNPC
(No.2014E38-2) and Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (No. 15CX06019A).
29
References
[1] YAN Jie-nian.Technology of Drilling fluid, third ed. China Petroleum University Press, DongYing, 2001.
[2] Qi lusheng, Procedia Engineering 73 (2014) 230-236.
[3] Skalle P. Drilling Fluid Engineering, third ed., E-Publishing Inc., London, 2012.
[4] Adeleye Sanmi Apaleke, Abdulaziz Al-Majed, M. Enamul Hossain, Society of Petroleum Engineers 149555
(2012) 1-13.
[5] Kaneda I, Sogabe A, Nakajima H, Journal of colloid and interface science 275 (2004) 450-457.
[6] L. Yan, C. Wang, B. Xu, J. Sun, W. Yue, Z. Yang, Mater Lett 105 (2013) 232-235.
[7] M. MANEA, REV. CHIM 63 (2012) 1132-1137.
[8] Audibert A,Argillier J F., Society of Petroleum Engineers (1995) 81-91.
[9] Alemdar A, ztekin N, Gngr N, et al., Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects
252 (2005) 95-98.
[10] C. Zhao, K. Tong, J. Tan, Q. Liu, T. Wu, D. Sun, Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and
Engineering Aspects 457 (2014) 8-15.
[11] X. Wang, X. Yang, L. Wang, Ch. Su, J. Li, SINO-GLOBAL ENERGY 14 (2009) 37-41.
[12] Oyewole Taye Salami, Johann Plank, J Appl Polymer Sci 129 (2013) 1-10.
[13] Wu Y.M, Sun D.J, Zhang B.Q, J Appl Polymer Sci 83 (2002) 3068-3075.
[14] C Tiemeyer,J Plank.Synthesis, J Appl Polymer Sci 128 (2013) 851-860.
[15] Q. Chu, P. Luo, Q. Zhao, J. Feng, X. Kuang, J Appl Polymer Sci 128 (2013) 28-40.
[16] B. Xie, Zh. Qiu, Journal of Macromolecular Science, Part A: Pure and Applied Chemistry 50(2013)
230-237.
[17] N. Alimohammadi, S.R. Shadizadeh, I. Kazeminezhad, Fuel 111 (2013) 505-509.
[18] H.Y. Zhong, Z.S. Qiu, W.A. Huang, J. Cao, F.W. Wang, X.B. Zhang, Petroleum Science and Technology 31
(2013) 2127-2133.
[19] H.Y. ZHONG, Z.S. QIU, W.A. HUANG, J. Cao, F.W. Wang, B.Q. Xie, Energy Sources, Part A: Recovery,
Utilization, and Environmental Effects 35 (2013) 218-225.
[20] Md. Amanullah, Mohammad K Al-Arfaj, Ziad Al-Abdullatif, SPE/IADC Drilling Conference and Exhibition
139534 (2011) 1-9.
30
[21] Md. Amanullah, Ashraf M. Al-Tahini, SPE Saudia Arabia Section Technical Symposium 126102 (2009)
1-12.
[22] Katherine Price Hoelscher, Guido De Stefano, Meghan Riley, Steve Young, SPE International Oilfield
Nanotechnology Conference and Exhibition 157031 (2012) 1-7.
[23] Mohammad F. Zakaria, Maen Husein, Geir Hareland, SPE International Oilfield Nanotechnology
Conference held in Noordwijk 156992 (2012) 1-6.
[24] M.Parvinzadeh, S.Moradian, A.Rashidi, M.E.Yazdanshenas, APPL SURF SCI 256 (2010) 2792-2802.
[25] Y.C. Ke, P. Stroeve, Polymer-Layered Silicate and Silica Nanocomposites, first ed., Elsevier B.V. 2005.
[26] B.A. Rozenberg, R. Tenne, PROG POLYM SCI 33 (2008) 40-112.
[27] X. Jia, Y. Li, Q. Cheng, S. Zhang, B. Zhang, EUR POLYM J 43 (2007) 1123-1131.
[28] Hoon choi, I-Wei Chen, Journal of Colloid and Interface Science 258 (2003) 435-437.
[29] L.D. Zhang, W.L. Liu, W.H. Xu, J.S. Yao, L. Zhao, X.Q. Wang, Y.Z. Wu, Appl. Surf. Sci 259(2012) 719725.
[30] D. Tian, X.H. Chu, D.H. Yu, Y.Z. Yue, P. Zhao, X.L. Sun, W.L. Liu, Industrial and Engineering Chemistry
Research 50 (2011) 61096114.
[31] V. Buryachenko, A. Roy, K. Lafdi, K. Anderson, S. Chellapilla, Compos Sci Technol, 65 (2005) 2435-2465.
[32] P. Liu, Z. Su, Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology A 167 (2004) 237240.
[33] N.A. Agudelo, L.D. Perez, B.L. Lopez, Applied Surface Science 257 (2011) 85818586.
[34] H. Zhao, Y. Li, R. Liu, F. Zhao, Y. Hu, Mater Lett 62 (2008) 3401-3403.
[35] P. Kiliaris, C.D. Papaspyrides, PROG POLYM SCI 35 (2010) 902-958.
[36] American Petroleum Institute. Recommended practice standard procedure for laboratory testing drilling
fluids, New York: Production Dept. of American Petroleum Institute,1990.
[37] Q. Sun, Z. Li, S. Li, L. Jiang, J. Wang, P. Wang, Energy & Fuels 28 (2014) 2384-2394.
[38] Z. Li, Z. Liu, Adv. Mater. Res. 311 (2011) 396-405.
[39] T. Lu, Z. Li, S. Li, B. Li, S. Liu, Energy & Fuels, 27 (2013) 3499-3507.
[40] X. Zhang, Synthesis and Application Performance of Barium sulfate (Strontium) Scale Inhibitor, Cheng Du:
Southwest Petroleum University (2007) 32-35.
[41] H. Mao, Z. Qiu, Z. Shen, W. Huang, H. Zhong, ACTA PETROLEI SINICA 35 (2014) 771-778.
[42] B. GAO; R. XU; N. WU; L. XU, ACTA POLYMERICA SINICA. 1 (2003) 368-372.
31
[43] F. Chen, J. Xiong, X. Kuang, F. Hou, Applied Chemical Industry 39 (2010) 1127-1130.
Highlights
Micro-nano material has great potential for developing intelligent drilling fluid.
The composites can improve the pressure bearing ability of formation significantly.
32