Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Methods
DOI 10.1007/s12161-015-0224-5
* M. Asadollahi-Baboli
asadollahi@nit.ac.ir
1
Introduction
Thyme is an evergreen aromatic and important plant in North
America, Europe, Middle East, and Asia with many industrial
and medical applications (Stahl-Biskup and Saez 2003). The
extracts and oil of thyme were reported to have antibacterial,
antifungal, carminative, and expectorant activities (Daniel
2006; Jouki et al. 2014; Sellamuthu et al. 2013). Garden
thyme (Thymus vulgaris L.) and wild thyme (Thymus
serpyllum L.) are well-known spices as flavoring agent and
herbal medicine. The commercial value of these species depends on their chemical composition of volatiles fraction.
Garden and wild thyme are used in many fields such as aromatherapy, spices, nutrition, perfumes, and cosmetics (StahlBiskup and Saez 2003). The volatile compositions of thyme
extracts from different origins have been reported in literature.
Thymol and carvacrol have been reported as the major components in both garden and wild thyme (Giordiani et al. 2008;
Golmakani and Rezaei 2008; Nikolic et al. 2014; Rota et al.
2008). The fragrance volatiles of garden thyme also have been
reported in literature using head space solid-phase
microextraction (SPME) sample preparation with different
sorbents (Bicchi et al. 2006; Staszek et al. 2014).
Nevertheless, the minor components are extremely important
factors determining the spicy aroma and sensory quality of
thyme. Moreover, these minor components may have important therapeutic value (Giordiani et al. 2008). In all previous
studies, the minor and major components in complex gas
chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) data have been
determined using direct similarity searches. Due to presence
of baseline drift, noise, and co-eluted components (embedded/
overlapping peaks) in real complex samples such as thyme,
similarity matches in the MS library can mislead to wrong
identification and quantification of volatiles (AsadollahiBaboli and Mani-Varnosfaderani 2014). To solve these
Experimental
Electrospinning of Polyamide Nanofibers
In order to obtain a homogenous polymer solution, 0.2 g of
nylon 6 was dissolved in 1 mL of formic acid. Then, 0.5 mL of
this solution was withdrawn into a 2.5-mL syringe which was
eventually located in a syringe pump. The nanofiber sheet was
fabricated by electrospinning of polyamide on a piece of aluminum foil (55 cm). Under this condition, the aluminum foil
and the polymer containing syringe needle were connected to
the high-voltage power supply terminals (15 kV). The distance between the needle and the collector was set at 10 cm,
while a flow rate of 1.5 L min1 was set for the syringe pump
to deliver the polyamide polymer solution. All the
electrospinning processes were performed under the ventilation for 8 h. After the electrospinning experiment, a sheet with
a typical dimension of 11 cm was cut from the central part of
the foil employed for SPME. A Brandenburg (West Midlands,
England)-regulated power supply and a KDS100 syringe
pump (KdScientific Co., Holliston, MA, USA) were used
for electrospinning and the polymer solution delivery in the
electrospinning process, respectively. The image of the surface of polyamide nanofibers was obtained by scanning
Fig. 2 Analytical performance of polyamide nanofibers and PDMS categorized into four chemical classes
Fig. 4 The local TICs of a peak cluster A obtained from garden thyme and b peak cluster B obtained from wild thyme. c Morphological score plot and d
subspace plot of OPA-SIMPLISMA. Resolved chromatograms of e peak cluster A and f peak cluster B using MCR-ALS
Results
SPME has been carried out in order to extract the volatiles of
garden and wild thyme. In this work, polyamide nanofibers
were employed for SPME because of its high surface area and
porous structure. According to the SEM image (Fig. 1), the
polyamide nanofiber sizes are in the range of 50100 nm and
possess very porous structure, which should significantly increase the surface area availability on the fiber. In addition, the
spaces among the nanofibers are in the range of 200500 nm
and this should facilitate much faster analyte diffusion, while
they are bead-free and have smooth morphology. For comparison, the effects of sorbent on the extraction efficiency, both
polyamide nanofibers and typical PDMS, were investigated to
facilitate the best performance. As shown in Fig. 2, polyamide
nanofibers show better analytical performance compared to
typical PDMS. The height of the bars in this figure represents
the relative composition of volatiles of thyme quantities in
each sorbent in terms of peak area. Volatiles were classified
into four chemical groups consisting of monoterpene hydrocarbons, oxygenated monoterpenes, sesquiterpene hydrocarbons, and oxygenated sesquiterpene. Both the number of identified components and the peak area in these four chemical
groups were increased using polyamide nanofibers.
The garden and wild thyme extracts were injected in GCMS in the full scan mode. The chromatographic profiles of the
Fig. 5 Resolved mass spectra (a, b) and standard mass spectra (c, d) for terpinen-4-ol and aromadendrene, respectively
using just one method due to the accumulation of noise in GCMS data. Consequently, subspace comparison is also utilized
for the chemical rank determination. In order to reduce the
Table 1
No.
RMFb
RIc
Percentage
Garden thyme
RSDd
Wild thyme
RSD
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
3-Thujene
-Pinene
Camphene
-Phellandrene
-Pinene
-Myrcene
-Terpinen
p-Cymene
m-Cymene
1,8-Cineol
-Ocimene
trans-Sabinene
923
940
919
958
975
953
971
950
966
924
932
950
917
923
937
944
966
983
1008
1016
1032
1038
1041
1045
0.12
0.80
0.55
0.34
0.25
0.43
0.63
3.30
0.31
0.20
3.16
4.36
7.72
4.50
11.12
4.64
10.64
4.80
4.35
5.37
0.28
1.64
0.07
0.81
0.21
0.39
1.45
0.26
0.55
0.38
3.76
5.47
5.10
7.97
6.35
6.58
6.27
9.66
7.49
3.23
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
-Terpinene
2-Carene
4-Thujanol
-Terpineol
Linalool
Terpinen-4-ol
cis-Chrysanthenol
Sabinol
Camphor
Citronellal
Sorborneol
p-Menth-8-en-3-ol
-Terpineol
cis-Dihydrocarvone
p-Cumic aldehyde
Thymol methyl ether
Cuminaldehyde
Anethole
971
940
926
958
948
973
954
967
910
925
969
917
957
905
915
948
920
972
1050
1062
1069
1079
1083
1089
1123
1130
1134
1156
1172
1178
1184
1190
1222
1226
1234
1245
0.29
0.13
0.34
0.48
0.64
0.21
0.28
0.19
0.37
0.28
0.18
0.39
1.09
11.30
8.53
5.90
6.38
11.04
5.45
6.41
7.31
11.37
9.90
9.41
8.67
4.00
3.95
0.11
0.08
0.12
0.83
0.23
0.34
0.43
0.04
0.65
0.28
0.59
0.89
0.17
0.39
2.28
0.34
5.11
9.04
3.84
10.52
5.91
9.50
10.34
7.34
8.86
8.52
4.27
9.62
8.79
12.80
8.91
5.60
6.00
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
Isobornyl acetate
Durenol
Carvacrol
Thymol
Thymolacetate
-Caryophyllene
-Elemene
Aromadendrene
-Elemene
-Humulene
Ledene
-Muurolene
954
959
985
980
954
955
947
953
951
929
953
910
1276
1281
1292
1298
1346
1407
1413
1420
1425
1459
1474
1491
0.72
17.23
60.12
4.38
3.12
0.64
0.27
9.48
3.96
2.81
4.14
5.19
5.36
11.90
0.21
3.56
23.95
48.24
0.75
0.89
0.32
1.07
0.25
0.25
0.21
2.23
4.97
2.74
3.10
5.74
6.22
3.76
3.64
4.75
8.88
6.11
43
-Cadinene
936
1502
0.87
7.53
44
45
46
47
a
Chemicala
Spathulenol
Caryophyllene oxide
Guaiol
-Eudesmol
RMFb
926
948
917
946
RIc
1566
1570
1579
1585
Percentage
Garden thyme
RSDd
Wild thyme
RSD
0.41
0.39
9.31
10.53
0.21
0.56
0.07
0.15
10.05
2.20
13.46
6.48
Identification was based on comparing the resolved MCR-ALS mass spectra with those of standards using MS library database and RI
Reverse match factor for the resolved mass spectrum MS library database
Relative standard deviation on relative peak area for three times replication (n=3). The RSD on peak area for all components was less than 12 %
Fig. 6 a Score plot and b loading plot in PCA plot of the garden and wild thyme
resolution techniques. In the peak cluster A, the relative percentages of -terpineol, linalool, and terpinen-4-ol are 0.34,
0.48, and 0.64, respectively. In the peak cluster B, the relative
percentages of -caryophyllene, -elemene, aromadendrene,
and -elemene are 0.89, 0.32, 1.07, and 0.25, respectively.
For comparative analysis between garden and wild thyme,
PCA was used to recognize intrinsic patterns in the GC-MS
data in an unbiased way. This technique helps determine hidden structure and cluster the garden and wild thyme into two
different classes. The relative percentages of the resolved
peaks were used to perform PCA. Figure 6a, b illustrates the
score and loading plots using ten samples (five samples of
each garden and wild thyme). The PC1 and PC2 explained
67.84 and 25.92 % of the total variance, respectively. As
Fig. 6a indicates, the garden and wild thyme can be easily
classified in two distinct species with acceptable variation between and within two classes. PCA also helps determine those
volatiles which were the most differentiating within the entire
data. The loading plot (Fig. 6b) reveals those volatiles which
were the most differentiating within the volatiles of garden
and wild thyme. The 14 components which account for the
most of the variance in the dataset are given more weight in
the loading plot. These results show that garden and wild
thyme are different enough in terms of chemical composition
to put them in two distinct classes. Table 1 shows the volatiles
and the relative percentages of each component in the garden
and wild thyme. The reproducibility of analysis was explored
with three replicate experiments (n=3) for both garden and
wild thyme samples. The Kovats retention index (RI) as a
complementary identification tool in HP-5MS was calculated
for each component. The RI, RMF, and relative standard deviations (RSD) are presented in Table 1 for all components in
the both samples. The results revealed that thymol and carvacrol are major components in the both samples. As shown in
this table, thymol (60.12 %), carvacrol (17.23 %),
thymolacetate (4.38 %), p-cymene (3.3 %), and caryophyllene (3.12 %) are the main components of garden
thyme. Also, thymol (48.24 %), carvacrol (23.95 %), terpinene (3.95 %), thymol methyl ether (2.28 %), and camphene (1.64 %) are the major components of wild thyme.
Discussion
Both garden and wild thyme volatiles were analyzed by
SPME with polyamide nanofibers together with GC-MS and
chemometric resolution techniques. Moreover, different problems of baseline drift, noisy data, and co-elution of components in GC-MS have been addressed using chemometrics. In
addition, polyamide nanofibers were superior compared to
typical PDMS in terms of extraction performance.
Therefore, the described combined strategy was utilized for
the first time to analyze the volatile components of the garden
Conflict of Interest M. Asadollahi-Baboli declares that he has no conflict of interest. A. Aghakhani declares that he has no conflict of interest.
V. Bikdeloo declares that he has no conflict of interest. This article does
not contain any studies with human or animal subjects.
References
Asadollahi-Baboli M, Aghakhani A (2014) Rapid analysis of Origanum
majorana L. fragrance using nanofiber sheet, GC-MS and
chemometrics. J Sep Sci 37:990996
Asadollahi-Baboli M, Mani-Varnosfaderani A (2014) Chemometrics
assisted GC-MS analysis of volatile and semi-volatile constituents
of Elettaria Cardamomum. Food Anal Methods 7:17451754
Bicchi C, Belliardo F, Cordero C, Liberto E, Rubiolo P, Sgorbini B (2006)
Headspace-solid-phase microextraction in the analysis of the volatile fraction of aromatic and medicinal plants. J Chromatogr Sci 44:
416429
Daniel M (2006) Medicinal plants: chemistry and properties. Science
Publishers, New York
Gemperline P (2006) Practical guide to chemometrics. Taylor & Francis,
London
Giordiani R, Hadef Y, Kaloustina J (2008) Compositions and antifungal
activities of essential oils of some Algerian aromatic plants.
Fitoterapia 79:199203
Golmakani M, Rezaei K (2008) Comparison of microwave-assisted
hydrodistillation with the traditional hydrodistillation method in
the extraction of essential oils from Thymus vulgaris L. Food
Chem 109:925930
Jalali-Heravi M, Parastar H, Kamalzadeh M, Tauler R, Jaumot J (2010)
MCRC software: a tool for chemometric analysis of two-way chromatographic data. Chemom Intell Lab Syst 104:155171
Jalali-Heravi M, Moazeni-Pourasil RS, Sereshti H (2014) Thorough analysis of Iranian spearmint essential oil: combination of chemometrics
and gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. Anal Methods 6:6753
6759
Jaumot J, de Juan A, Tauler R (2015) MCR-ALS GUI 2.0: new features
and applications. Chemom Intell Lab Syst 140:112
Jiang R, Pawliszyn J (2012) Thin-film microextraction offers another
geometry for solid-phase microextraction. TrAC Trends Anal
Chem 39:245253
Jouki M, Mortazavi SA, Yazdi FT, Koocheki A (2014) Characterization
of antioxidant antibacterial quince seed mucilage films containing
thyme essential oil. Carbohydr Polym 99:537546
Miao L, Cai W, Shao X (2011) Rapid analysis of multicomponent pesticide mixture by GC-MS with the aid of chemometric resolution.
Talanta 83:12471253