Steps to follow in resolving LD Mismatches

1. Get the Mismatch report using RE.STAT.MISMATCH

2. Put the output of this report into an EXCEL Spreadsheet
3. For each line in the MISMATCH, extract the following details from
RE.CONSOL.SPEC.ENTRY
LIST FXXX.RE.CONSOL.SPEC.ENTRY WITH CONSOL.KEY.TYPE
EQ %CONSOL.KEY% BY TRANS.REFERENCE BREAK ON
TRANS.REFERENCE TOTAL AMOUNT.LCY
Note
This command extracts all Contracts with the CONSOL Key with their
respective balances
The Total Amount will be the same as the CRF amount on the CONSOL
Line
a. RE.STAT.MISMATCH OUTPUT
CONSOL KEY
CONTRACT
LD.1.TR.NGN.21002.180.6.NG.1M.50010
0

CRF
-24,657.53

DIFF
24,657.53

b. RE.CONSOL.SPEC.ENTRY Extraction Command

>LIST FXXX.RE.CONSOL.SPEC.ENTRY WITH CONSOL.KEY.TYPE EQ
LD.1.TR.NGN.21002.180.6.NG.1M.50010 BY TRANS.REFERENCE BREAK ON
TRANS.REFERENCE TOTAL AMOUNT.LCY

The above command returns the following results:

> LIST FAPP.RE.CONSOL.SPEC.ENTRY WITH CONSOL.KEY.TYPE EQ
LD.1.TR.NGN.21002.180.6.NG.1M.50010 BY TRANS.REFERENCE BREAK.ON
TRANS.REFERENCE TOTAL AMOUNT.LCY DET.SUP 15:56:54 10-31-02 PAGE 1
TRANS.REFERENCE..........
AMOUNT.LCY.........
LD.1.TR.NGN.21002.180.6.N
G.1M
LD0122800330

0
-24657.53
===================
-24657.53

From the above result, it shows that the Contract LD0122800330

generated a mismatch of 24657.53 into the Consol Line
LD.1.TR.NGN.21002.180.6.NG.1M.50010
4. Extract all the entries relating to the Contract from the
RE.CONSOL.SPEC.ENTRY using the following command:

> LIST FAPP.RE.CONSOL.SPEC.ENTRY WITH TRANS.REFERENCE EQ LD0122800330 BY

BOOKING.DATE TOTAL AMOUNT.LCY TRANSACTION.CODE CONSOL.KEY.TYPE

This command returns the following output:

LIST FAPP.RE.CONSOL.SPEC.ENTRY WITH TRANS.REFERENCE EQ LD0122800330 BY BOOKING.DATE TOTAL AMOUNT.LCY
TRANSACTION.CODE CONSOL.KEY.TYP
E 17:26:45 10-31-02 PAGE 1
@ID......................
AMOUNT.LCY.........
TRANSACTION.CODE
CONSOL.KEY.TYPE.............................................
.....
122820003268703.01
122820002178859.15
122840001465545.14
122840001465550.02
122840001465554.03
122860001278704.05
122870001277434.09
122880001477868.14
122890001177006.35
122930007330589.09
122930007330583.04
122930007330586.13
122940001800947.11
122950001362463.02
122960002302384.27
122970001901771.19
122980001878812.05
122980001878812.04

5000000
1643.84
1643.84
1643.84
1643.84
1643.84
1643.84
1643.84
1643.84
1643.84
1643.84
1643.84
1643.84
1643.84
1643.84
1643.77
-5000000
-24657.53
===================
-0.000000003

CNW
ACC
ACC
ACC
ACC
ACC
ACC
ACC
ACC
ACC
ACC
ACC
ACC
ACC
ACC
ACC
MAT
CAP

LD.1.TR.NGN.21002.180.6.NG.CALL.LIVECR
LD.1.TR.NGN.21002.180.6.NG.CALL.50010
LD.1.TR.NGN.21002.180.6.NG.CALL.50010
LD.1.TR.NGN.21002.180.6.NG.CALL.50010
LD.1.TR.NGN.21002.180.6.NG.CALL.50010
LD.1.TR.NGN.21002.180.6.NG.CALL.50010
LD.1.TR.NGN.21002.180.6.NG.CALL.50010
LD.1.TR.NGN.21002.180.6.NG.CALL.50010
LD.1.TR.NGN.21002.180.6.NG.CALL.50010
LD.1.TR.NGN.21002.180.6.NG.CALL.50010
LD.1.TR.NGN.21002.180.6.NG.CALL.50010
LD.1.TR.NGN.21002.180.6.NG.CALL.50010
LD.1.TR.NGN.21002.180.6.NG.CALL.50010
LD.1.TR.NGN.21002.180.6.NG.CALL.50010
LD.1.TR.NGN.21002.180.6.NG.CALL.50010
LD.1.TR.NGN.21002.180.6.NG.CALL.50010
LD.1.TR.NGN.21002.180.6.NG.1M.LIVECR
LD.1.TR.NGN.21002.180.6.NG.1M.50010

From the above output, it shows that the contract has entries for 2 live cycles, which are
CALL and 1M. It has 24657.53 on line LD.1.TR.NGN.21002.180.6.NG.1M.50010, while it
has +24657.53 on line LD.1.TR.NGN.21002.180.6.NG.CALL.50010. Therefore there will be
a mismatch on both lines to the tune of 24657.53 (Db/Cr as the case may be). This can be
shown as follows (using the filter feature of Microsoft Excel):
FOR LD.1.TR.NGN.21002.180.6.NG.CALL.50010
122820002178859.15
122840001465545.14
122840001465550.02
122840001465554.03
122860001278704.05
122870001277434.09
122880001477868.14
122890001177006.35
122930007330589.09
122930007330583.04
122930007330586.13
122940001800947.11
122950001362463.02
122960002302384.27
122970001901771.19

1643.84
1643.84
1643.84
1643.84
1643.84
1643.84
1643.84
1643.84
1643.84
1643.84
1643.84
1643.84
1643.84
1643.84
1643.77
===================
24657.53

ACC
ACC
ACC
ACC
ACC
ACC
ACC
ACC
ACC
ACC
ACC
ACC
ACC
ACC
ACC

LD.1.TR.NGN.21002.180.6.NG.CALL.50010
LD.1.TR.NGN.21002.180.6.NG.CALL.50010
LD.1.TR.NGN.21002.180.6.NG.CALL.50010
LD.1.TR.NGN.21002.180.6.NG.CALL.50010
LD.1.TR.NGN.21002.180.6.NG.CALL.50010
LD.1.TR.NGN.21002.180.6.NG.CALL.50010
LD.1.TR.NGN.21002.180.6.NG.CALL.50010
LD.1.TR.NGN.21002.180.6.NG.CALL.50010
LD.1.TR.NGN.21002.180.6.NG.CALL.50010
LD.1.TR.NGN.21002.180.6.NG.CALL.50010
LD.1.TR.NGN.21002.180.6.NG.CALL.50010
LD.1.TR.NGN.21002.180.6.NG.CALL.50010
LD.1.TR.NGN.21002.180.6.NG.CALL.50010
LD.1.TR.NGN.21002.180.6.NG.CALL.50010
LD.1.TR.NGN.21002.180.6.NG.CALL.50010

FOR LD.1.TR.NGN.21002.180.6.NG.1M.50010
122980001878812.04

-24657.53
===================
-24657.53

CAP

LD.1.TR.NGN.21002.180.6.NG.1M.50010

In the same way, the contract will generate a mismatch of 5000000 on both line
LD.1.TR.NGN.21002.180.6.NG.1M.LIVECR and line LD.1.TR.NGN.21002.180.6.NG.CALL.LIVECR
respectively. This is shown below:
FOR LD.1.TR.NGN.21002.180.6.NG.CALL.LIVECR
122820003268703.01

5000000
===================
5000000

CNW

LD.1.TR.NGN.21002.180.6.NG.CALL.LIVECR

FOR LD.1.TR.NGN.21002.180.6.NG.1M.LIVECR
122980001878812.05

-5000000
===================
-5000000

MAT

LD.1.TR.NGN.21002.180.6.NG.1M.LIVECR

5. In order to resolve mismatches resulting from contract LD0122800330, the

following entries must be raised into GEN.CET
No
1
2
3
4

CONSOL KEY
LD.1.TR.NGN.21002.180.6.NG.CALL.50010
LD.1.TR.NGN.21002.180.6.NG.1M.50010
LD.1.TR.NGN.21002.180.6.NG.CALL.LIVECR
LD.1.TR.NGN.21002.180.6.NG.1M.LIVECR

AMOUNT
24657.53
24657.53
5000000
5000000

SIGN
D
C
D
C

6) If the number of contracts which is having mismatch is more than one, then we
have to run re stat bal rec and export it to EXCEL and compare the same with
contract obtained through listing mentioned in step 3
7) Before passing correction, ensure that the LMM.ACCOUNT.BALANCES are
showing the correct figures. If not correct the balance and pass correction entries.

C/.TR./.TR./9999