, 16, 1(2), 2014

621

-
CFD
2014 .. , ..

16.03.2014
CFD , . .
. , .
.
: , , CFD , ,

, [1].
, , (. 1) [2,
3].
, [2],

, . , ,
, , .
CFD - [4].

. 1.
CFD . , CFD
,
. , [5]
. () .
, k- .
_______________________________________________
, . Email: svarogjk1989@rambler.ru
,
, , . E-mail: mtf@pstu.ru

m c
m in .

(1)

c m

in .
m

c h 1 ,

h .

410

(2)

VI , 25-27.03.2014

.
.
.
[5] ,
, 30 40
, 0,3
0,5.
[6] ,
, ,
CFD . CFD
. RNG k-
. , , -

CFD ,
,
. , , .
, [5], .
, CFD , ,
, , .
[7]
(). CFD .
k-, , . .

5 20. , ,
.
[8] CFD .
, , . . 2D

3D . 3D
, 60 .
. . ,
. ,
. 40 50
, 0,2-0,5.
, ,
60 , 0,8. , .
[9]

(ASM) k- . , , .
0,3 0,8,
, ,

15.
. [10]

. :
(. 2).
.
.
.
:
[3].
.

411

 , 16, 1(2), 2014

(. 2). ( )
.
.
. 3
,
.
, , 01, 51 .
, ,
( 12)
, . .
, ,
, 3h
.

.
, 34
,
.
.
4
5, .

.
CFD . CFD
.
CFD
, . ,
, ,
.
,
.
.
.
.

2D , . ,
[6, 7], , ,
. ,
, :

,
2D
. .
, ,
.
.

. 2.
[3]

. 3. [3]
.

(. 4).
: 1,
2, 3,
4, 5.
,

412

VI , 25-27.03.2014

: dvt ,
dc
, dm , dcve
,
2

din

, dcvi
, lvt lcv
.

dvt
dc

dcve

dcvi

lcv

lvt

. 4.
,
.
. , [3]
Ain
A
l
0,084 0,11; c 0,08 0,145; vt 45
Avt
Avt
d vt
,

Ain
, Avt
, Ac . , [8] , lvt/dvt =5.
, [11],

,
,
.
[11] lvt/dvt =35 .

, , ,
, . 4. , .
0,4 .
. ,
, ,

.

dc=4 .
dc =4 dc =6 . : dvt=16 , dcve=12 ,
dcvi=6 , lvt=170 , lcv=8 . ,
: Ain/Avt=0,1; Ac/Avt=0,06;
dc=4 Ac/Avt=0,14 dc=6 , lvt/dvt=10,6.

,
.
,
.
.


Ansys DesignModeler. Ansys Mesh. . 5.
60000 . , .
,

.
-, , . -,


.
0,015 , 0,15 .

413

 , 16, 1(2), 2014

[12]. 0 1,
.
min=1,3 10-10, ave=7,3 10-3, max=0,54
dc=4 min=1,3 10-10, ave=8,2 10-3, max=0,53
dc=6 , min, ave, max ,

, .
.

. 5.

.
Ansys Fluent.
, .
. ,
,
, 6 /. ,

. . . 6 .
276 ,

301 . .
(. 7). ,
.
. 3
.
, , ,
, 2D .
,
, -.


(. 8).

. 6.

414

VI , 25-27.03.2014

. 7.

. 8.
,
. ,

,
.
.
, .

.
:
1. .
2.
[10]
.
3. - ,
2D ,

415

 , 16, 1(2), 2014

.
,
3D .
4. 2D

.

5.

. .

. 9.

416

VI , 25-27.03.2014

.

.
2D
,

.
:
dc=4 dc=6
.
,
.
, 5; 5,5; 6; 6,5; 7
/. ,

. , ,

.
. 9.

dc=4 dc=6 .
x
. y
.
, ,

,
. ,

(.
10), , ,
7 dc=4 5 dc=6 .
.
10. ,

, , .

. 10.
dc=4 dc=6
.

. , , . :
1.
.
2.

.
, , ,

. , , [7].
:
CFD , . . 2D
, :

3D . .

417

 , 16, 1(2), 2014

:
1.

2.
3.
4.
5.

6.

7.

Darokar, H.V. Experimental investigations on divergent vortex tube with convergent entry nozzles / H.V.
Darokar, S.L. Borse, K.D. Devade // International journal of engineering research and technology. 2012.
Vol.1 (Issue 6). P. 1-6.
, .. / .., .. //
. 2012. 4. . 42-54.
Gao, C. Experimental study on the Ranque-Hilsh vortex tube PhD thesis. Eindhoven, 2005. 151 p.
, .. k-
// . 2013. 2. C. 5-16.
Akhesmeh, S. Numerical study of the temperature separation in the Ranque-Hilsh Vortex Tube / S. Akhesmeh,
N. Pourmahmoud, H. Sedgi // American J. of Engineering and Applied Sciences.2008. Vol.1 (No 3). P. 181187.
Skye, H.M. Comparison of CFD analysis to empirical
data in a commercial vortex tube / H.M. Skye, G.F.
Nellis, S.A. Klein // International journal of refrigeration. 2006. Vol. 29. P. 71-80.

Zin, K.K. Modeling and optimization of the vortex tube

with computational fluid dynamics analysis / K.K. Zin,
A. Hansske, F. Ziegler // Energy research journal. 2010.
No 1 (2). P. 193-196.
8. Azizi, S.H. Three and two dimensional compressible
turbulent flow simulation in a vortex tube / S.H. Azizi,
M.R. Andalibi, P. Khameneh // International conference
on mechanical, automotive and materials engineering.
Dubai, 2012. P. 182-186.
9. Smith, E. Numerical prediction of vortex flow and
thermal separation in a subsonic vortex tube / E. Smith,
P. Pongjet // Journal of Zhejiang university, science A.
2006. No 7(8). P. 1406-1415.
10. Ahlborn, B.K. The vortex tube as a classic thermodynamic refrigeration cycle / B.K. Ahlborn, J.M. Gordon
// Journal of applied physics. 2000. No 6(Vol. 88). P.
3645-3653.
11. Patel, R.B. Experimental investigation and numerical
analysis of Ranque Hilsh vortex tube / R.B. Patel, V.N.
Bartaria // International journal of engineering research
and technology. 2013. Vol.2 (1). P. 1359-1363.
12. www.ansys.com.

RESEARCH THE RANQUE-HILSH EFFECT

BY MEANS OF CFD ANALYSIS
2014 Ya.A. Korkodinov, A.M. Khanov
Perm National Research Polytechnical University
In work the review of CFD researches of the vortex effect executed by other authors is carried out. The
hypothesis of formation the refrigerating cycle is considered. The numerical analysis of 2D model of a
vortex tube is carried out. On the basis of analysis conclusions about validity of carrying out 2D analysis,
and also about legitimacy of application the hypothesis of emergence the refrigerating cycle are drawn.
Short research of influence of tube geometry on its efficiency is conducted.
Key words: vortex effect, temperature division, CFD analysis, refrigerating cycle, vortex tube

_______________________________________________
Yaroslav Korkodinov, Post-graduate Student. E-mail:
svarogjk1989@rambler.ru
Almaz Khanov, Doctor of Technical Sciences, Professor,
Head of the Department Machines Design and Technology
of Materials Processing. E-mail: mtf@pstu.ru

418