A short paper about a research lecture over arguments and critical thinking.

© All Rights Reserved

63 vues

A short paper about a research lecture over arguments and critical thinking.

© All Rights Reserved

- Philosophy Debate Rubric
- Critical thinking: A statement of expert consensus for purposes of educational assessment and instruction.txt
- Malcolm X
- Curriculum
- Write your assignments like professional writers by knowing these super amazing ways.
- posakeng02
- Argument Diagrams in Classroom
- The five C's
- CR Very Good Explanation
- Year 12 English Oral Pres Assessment-2
- 70 Useful Sentences for Academic Writing
- 2015 seminole self-score 3 bucket
- Lecture 7
- 9-10 standards unpacked
- article142.docx
- Command Words Card Sort
- Constructing an Argument Speculating About Causes
- Week 02 210 2013-14.ppt
- ITC Sec Fishbone
- thesis statement peer reviews

Vous êtes sur la page 1sur 6

Vanden Bouts main message this week is that the purpose of arguments is not so much so

that you can go around saying This is badthis is wrong, etc. but so that you can self-reflect

on your own arguments using critical thinking skills.

Dr. Vanden Bout established this main message by teaching us what logical fallacies are, but why

we should learn them. He first gave us fake reasons for why we should learn about logical

fallacies. They were that (1) it makes you look smart and (2) you get to learn some Latin. Even

though these reasons were light-hearted, he still made some serious assumptions when writing

them. He assumed that we care about looking smart and furthermore that we care about learning

Latin (which supposedly makes you look smart). His real reasons for learning about logical

fallacies were that they are (1) important for critical thinking, (2) needed to analyze things you

encounter in the world, and (3) most important for analyzing your own arguments. The main idea

of these three points is that analyzation is key to critical thinking in the real world, and knowing

about logical fallacies is a very important skill to have up the sleeve of your critical thinking

shirt.

My conclusion about his message is that all of his points could have easily been made using

mathematical language, which I prefer. During his lecture I found myself re-writing his

statements in mathematical language, which I will happily share. My first example of this is the

Undistributed Middle. He was kind of inconsistent because he actually explained this using set

notation, but did not conclude with it. Basically: All A is C and all B is C, therefore all A is B. In

mathematics, this is the Transitive Property (If A=C and B=C, then A=B). However, by

definition of equivalence, for A to equal C (or for A to equal B, or for B to equal C), A has to be a

subset of C and C has to be a subset of A. In words: Let A = all students, C = people who carry

backpacks, and B = my grandfather. His specific example of the undistributed middle was as

follows:

(All students) (carry bacpacks) => A=C

(My grandfather) (carries a backpack) => B=C

Therefore, (my grandfather) (is a student). => B=A

Seems logical, right? Wrong! Because of our definition of equivalence/the transitive property!

A=C doesnt follow (assuming all students carry backpacks), because all students carry

backpacks (A is a subset of C) but not all people who carry backpacks are students (therefore C

is NOT a subset of A), therefore A CAN NOT equal C. The same logic applies throughout the

example. B cannot equal A, simply because the conjectures are false.

His other example used the word often (Baptists are often politically conservative), this

language alone disproves the whole conjecture simply because for something to be true it has to

ALWAYS be true. Mathematically: Let A = {x is an element of all real numbers | x = 3 and x = 2,

4, 6 (all even numbers)} (in English: Let A be the set of all real numbers such that x can equal

3 and x can equal all even numbers). Let B = {x is an element of all real numbers | x = 2, 4, 6

(all even numbers)} (in English: Let B be the set of all real numbers such that x can equal all

even numbers). Whenever A does not equal 3, A=B. HOWEVER, since A CAN equal 3, A DOES

NOT equal B. A conjecture must ALWAYS be true in order for it to be true.

As a math major, I am pretty convinced that mathematical language trumps all. First of all, it is

universal. Second of all, it is precise by definition. However, in order to convince me of

otherwise, I would need proof that people understand arguments that are written normally better

than arguments that are written in proper mathematical set notation like I wrote above (I have to

specify proper because I have read plenty of improper proofs with undefined sets and random

conjectures and it looks like rocket science, when really its just saying 1 + 1 = 2).

CLARIFY why you think this is speakers main message by providing two to three

ideas/points the speaker used to establish the main message.

TESTIFY to your conclusion about the message. State your conclusion and two to three

points that support your conclusion. The supporting points do not have to be restricted to what

was presented by the speaker.

RECTIFY your conclusion after discussion in class. Did your position/conclusion about the

speakers message change or stay the same? Why? Describe one piece of support that would

be needed to change your mind.

Bad Arguments

Not so much so you can go around saying this is badthis is wrong, etc but so

you can self-reflect on your own arguments.

-- the practice of taking someones argument to the extreme and then throwing it

back at them as crazy

Sheldons argument was that Penny couldnt stay because if there was an

earthquake theyd only have the supplies to survive for 2 days.

Leonard twisted it and told Penny: Do you promise not to gnaw on our flesh while we

sleep?

-It makes you look smart

-You get to use some Latin

^--- Vanden Bout is making some serious assumptions here.

-Important for Critical Thinking

-Needed to analyze things you encounter in the world

-Most important for analyzing your own arguments

What is being argued? (refer to phone)

Undistributed Middle

Terrible name, used all the time.

All A is C.

All B is C.

Therefore, all A is B.

Seems like it would be easy to spot! (well, its not.)

Ex) All students carry backpacks (accept as true)

My grandfather carries a backpack. (true)

Therefore, my grandfather is a student (false)

Implied everyone who carries a backpack is a student.

*my notes: In mathematical language, for A to equal B, A has to be a subset of B

and B has to be a subset of A.

Another example)

Baptists are often politically conservative.

Republicans are often politically conservative.

*This shit doesnt make sense because of the word often, in order to use

something in a proof it has to be ALWAYS true.

Straw Man

ex) Evolution is nonsense. They would have you believe that humans are

descendants from Gorillas and Chimpanzees. Why arent we jumping around in

trees? The whole idea is absurd.

ex) You clearly said that you no longer supported our development of the Tritan

nuclear submarine. Why would you want the country defenseless is beyond me?

The strawman is that you arent going to argue for the submarine, instead you

argue that the governor (or whoever) wants to leave the country defenseless.

ex) Direct TV. If you keep cable, then youll end up in a ditch.

**note: this seems like Reductio ad Absurdum, Vanden Bout is trying to make the

argument above seem ridiculous

Tacobell, girl has taco with bacon, guys approach her at bar

Non Sequitur:

old spice, in locker room lost game, smell old spice, go to desert island very nice,

then bam lizards eating your legs.

big bang theory. Sheldon no mom I could not feel your church group praying for my

safety, then just because Im home does not prove it was because of your church

group.

ad hominem:

Rather than arguing about the facts, you turn and try to make the argument about

the other person.

Barack Obama: last I checked, Sarah Palin was no expert on nuclear warfare

Appeal to false authority:

sony commercial. board of celebrities says sony are great, because people always

take pictures of them.

Problem 1: I did it, therefore my opinion represents everyone

2: All pornography is playboy

3:

- Philosophy Debate RubricTransféré parRemmirathion
- Critical thinking: A statement of expert consensus for purposes of educational assessment and instruction.txtTransféré parAmanda
- Malcolm XTransféré parmarialetiziaaa
- CurriculumTransféré parLloyd Bryant
- Write your assignments like professional writers by knowing these super amazing ways.Transféré parFast Assignment Help
- posakeng02Transféré parBhanumatik Tratinovic
- Argument Diagrams in ClassroomTransféré parSvend Haugaard Sørensen
- The five C'sTransféré parRaphy Alvarez
- CR Very Good ExplanationTransféré parboka987
- Year 12 English Oral Pres Assessment-2Transféré parbahara
- 70 Useful Sentences for Academic WritingTransféré parPhạm Văn Tưởng
- 2015 seminole self-score 3 bucketTransféré parapi-204141131
- Lecture 7Transféré parheidi_olson09
- 9-10 standards unpackedTransféré parapi-302779030
- article142.docxTransféré parEric Lauzon
- Command Words Card SortTransféré parDamien Rabbitte
- Constructing an Argument Speculating About CausesTransféré parErin McLaughlin
- Week 02 210 2013-14.pptTransféré parDany Huangyu
- ITC Sec FishboneTransféré parBRO HAFIZ
- thesis statement peer reviewsTransféré parapi-352150663
- How to Discuss a Book for History | W. Caleb McDanielTransféré parjboogs22
- eTransféré parapi-248210889
- informal writing proof 1Transféré parapi-273542259
- Sentences use for academic writing.docxTransféré parshawalina07
- Macbeth’s Final AssignmentTransféré parمنیر سادات
- argumentative draftTransféré parapi-453990667
- Types of ClaimsTransféré parBErna Lou Cezar
- Logic ReviewTransféré parMerlie Gotomanga
- 11-12 argumentative unit 4 plan sample 2Transféré parapi-260688313
- CR ReviewTransféré parreachsb

- Bhavitha 24.02.2011 EM MathsTransféré parSatya Narayana Bandaru
- Graphical User Interface (GUI)Transféré parRavindra Reddy
- Ferreyros CAT SwgrTransféré parHeber Flores
- HW 4 QuestionsTransféré parPapawu89
- Gene Keys Golden Path ForTransféré parVladimir Susanu
- LESSON 1-18 am amTransféré parKrisha Lorraine Malojo
- BAUTECH_ShotcreteTransféré parSAVA ZURNIC, MPM, CIPM
- 7-Speed 0Am VW TrainingTransféré pareddix
- Coconut DehuskingTransféré parGiridhar Sankar
- E77-14 Standard Test Method for Inspection and Verification of ThermometersTransféré parzerzeta
- 2016_D_Good Sampling Practice (MNT)Transféré parMário de Freitas
- Manual Rugosímetro.pdfTransféré parIvan
- C_25_techlibrary_402_EN_document_EN.pdfTransféré parSuroj Jiansuwan
- Combination PermutationTransféré parSitiSaum
- Ee1401 Power System Operation and Control Energy Control Center Safety,Transféré parsrmce
- Iapg - Pinpoint Completion Technology in the Vaca Muerta Shale a Case Study (Presentation)_v3Transféré parLuis M. Justiniano
- Wind PowerTransféré parpaldopal
- Jubilant Organosys ProjectTransféré parRaman Singh
- DB211 - Unit 8 Assignment ATransféré parTim Williams
- 1st GradingTransféré parJohn Alvin Delavin Gulosino
- HCITransféré parJayaletchumi Moorthy
- Purpose of the ProjectTransféré parNamit Jain
- Balancing Agility and Discipline Evaluating and InTransféré parEmad Lotfy
- eace69b8-0f2e-4616-a83c-3182bb7a1e16Transféré pardcba_4321
- Mineral System Analyses 2 Structures regional.pptTransféré pargeology1
- 2. Assignment - Personal Skills DevelopmentTransféré parPrem Ananth
- 03. Water Resources in the South - Present Scenario and Future Prospects (Nov. 2003)Transféré parRakhshanda Karim
- Report - CopyTransféré parMagnusAfBerg
- 130198699 23 IKO Poster Casting DefectsTransféré parMilica Antic
- Product Data Mangement e BookTransféré parPrasad Raikar