Vous êtes sur la page 1sur 17

5.

Congreso Residuos Slidos en el Peru


Characterisation of Waste

September 2016

Characterisation of
Municipal Solid Wastes
University of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences, Vienna
Department of Water, Atmosphere
and Environment
Institute of Waste Management
Stefan Salhofer
Gudrun Obersteiner
Marion Huber-Humer
Peter Beigl
Erwin Binner
Marlies Hrad
Peter Lechner
Sabine Lenz
Peter Mostbauer
Florian Part
Alexandra Pukhnyuk
Roland Ramusch
Silvia Scherhaufer
Elisabeth Schmied
Benjamin Steuer
Nicole Unger
Nina Degischer
Thomas Ebner
Reinhold Ottner
Zorica Stamenkovic

Erwin Binner MSc.


1

BOKUBOKU-University / Vienna
of Waste Management

Erwin Binner
Institute

Anna Happenhofer
Christian Hochhauer
Aleksander Jandric
Daniel Lesny
Simon Neubauer

La Molina 2016

Outlook
Analysis of Waste Composition
- Sampling Plan
- Number of Increment Samples
- Stratification
- Examples

Erwin Binner

ABF-BOKU / Erwin Binner

La Molina 2016

page 1

5. Congreso Residuos Slidos en el Peru


Characterisation of Waste

September 2016

Analysis of
Waste Composition
3

Erwin Binner

La Molina 2016

Sampling of Wastes

wastes in most cases are


very inhomogeneous
particle size
water content
content of hazardous compounds

the problem is to get a


representative sample
4

Erwin Binner

ABF-BOKU / Erwin Binner

La Molina 2016

page 2

5. Congreso Residuos Slidos en el Peru


Characterisation of Waste

September 2016

Sampling of Wastes
Municipal Solid Wastes (MSW) - Delivery

Erwin Binner
photo: Erwin Binner

La Molina 2016

Methods for Evaluation


Waste Separation Analysis (WSA)
in order to obtain data on waste amount and
composition one possibility is to carry out a
Waste Separation Analysis (WSA)
Austrian Standard (NORM S 2097)

definition WSA: quantitative and qualitative


determination of waste fractions obtained by
sorting of waste
a WSA consists of the sorting and an analysis of
spot samples

Erwin Binner

ABF-BOKU / Erwin Binner

La Molina 2016

page 3

5. Congreso Residuos Slidos en el Peru


Characterisation of Waste

September 2016

Waste Separation Analysis (WSA)


Procedure
motive / goal
(accuracy)

sampling scheme
(universal set, where to take samples and how many, which
fractions to analyse (products, materials) etc.)

sampling
(and documentation)

sorting of samples
analysis of results
7

Erwin Binner

report

La Molina 2016

Waste Separation Analysis (WSA)


Sampling Plan Sorting Fractions
fractions (components): compromise between
detailed results and effort, may be based on
materials, products or grain size
mostly based on materials, completed by selected
product groups and a sieving step
- recycling orientated (focused on materials)
- prevention orientated (focused on products)

Erwin Binner

ABF-BOKU / Erwin Binner

La Molina 2016

page 4

5. Congreso Residuos Slidos en el Peru


Characterisation of Waste

September 2016

Waste Separation Analysis (WSA)


Sampling Plan Number of Increments
date of sampling
there are seasonal fluctuations because of:
- fluctuation in amount (biogenous wastes)
- consumer behaviour (beverages during summer,
Christmas holidays)
- daily variation (working day / weekend)
3 to 4 campaigns during the year
wastes from one week
(depending on collection interval
1 to 7 samples are to be analysed)
9

Erwin Binner

La Molina 2016

Waste Separation Analysis (WSA)


Sampling Plan Number of Increments
number of increments: very important
- an increment sample is part of the population by
which via statistic data a characterisation of the
population shall be done.
compromise between accuracy and effort
- every element of population has to have the same
chance to become part of the sample
the less the homogeneity, the larger the
number of increment samples
calculation of number by statistical
criteria
choose of increments by chance (luck)
10

Erwin Binner

ABF-BOKU / Erwin Binner

La Molina 2016

page 5

5. Congreso Residuos Slidos en el Peru


Characterisation of Waste

September 2016

Waste Separation Analysis (WSA)


Sampling Plan Number of Increments
number of increments - calculation
(according to SCHARFF, 1991)

11

! problem: needed data prior to analyses


Erwin Binner
mostly not available! La Molina 2016

Waste Separation Analysis (WSA)


Sampling Plan Number of Increments
number of increments (simplification)

according to Austrian Standard -NORM S 2097-2 (2005)

n=

* 1-
Ki

if

n
N

<

0.05

n = number of increments
= standard deviation
= confidence coefficient (1.96 for 95% safety)
Ki = allowed confidence interval
N = population

! problem: varies for each fraction!


12

Erwin Binner

ABF-BOKU / Erwin Binner

La Molina 2016

page 6

5. Congreso Residuos Slidos en el Peru


Characterisation of Waste

September 2016

Waste Separation Analysis (WSA)


Sampling Plan Number of Increments
number of increments (case studies)
(Dahlen und Lagerkvist, 2008)

5 % of inhabitants should be covered (Nordtest, 1995)


100 to 200 households per stratum (Nordtest, 1995)
45 m3 volume of collection bins (EU, 2004)

amount (volume) per increment:


each collection vehicle 90 to 150 kg (ASTM, 2003)
6 m3 per stratum (EU, 2004)
300 kg per stratum when sorting collection bins
(Maystre und Viret, 1995)

10 increments if > 100 kg each (Sharma und Mc Bean, 2007)


40 increments if < 100 kg each (Zeng et al., 2005)

13

La Molina 2016

Erwin Binner

Waste Separation Analysis (WSA)


Sampling Plan Number of Increments
approximation for MSW:
Ms = 0.6 x max. grain size
Ms minimum amount of sample, in kg
max. grain size, in mm

14

max. grain
size

20 mm

50 mm

100 mm

200 mm

300 mm

400 mm

amount of
sample

12 kg

30 kg

60 kg

120 kg

180 kg

240 kg

density (kg/l)
1)

0.8

0.7

0.6

0.5

0.4

0.3

volume of
sample

15 l

43 l

100 l

240 l

450 l

800 l

Erwin Binner

ABF-BOKU / Erwin Binner

1)

very rough estimation!!

La Molina 2016

page 7

5. Congreso Residuos Slidos en el Peru


Characterisation of Waste

September 2016

Waste Separation Analysis (WSA)


Sampling Plan Level of Access
level of access
waste collection bin (e.g. waste):
- samples which are not of interest can be excluded easily
(e.g. commercial waste)
- huge effort for planning and sampling
- accessibility of bins (locked houses)

collection vehicle:
- high representativeness by mixing
- large sample amount
- Increase of fines
- compaction

15

La Molina 2016

Erwin Binner

Waste Separation Analysis (WSA)


Sampling Plan Stratification
strata of population:
similarities and differences in varying parts of the area
of investigation
- economic structure
- agriculture / forestry / commercial area / services area
- income of inhabitants

- settlement structure
- settlement density (multistory building / garden area)
- residential area / commercial area
- tourism

- waste management criteria


- collection interval / volume of collection bins
- measures for prevention / measures for recycling

16

Erwin Binner

ABF-BOKU / Erwin Binner

La Molina 2016

page 8

5. Congreso Residuos Slidos en el Peru


Characterisation of Waste

September 2016

Waste Separation Analysis (WSA)


Sampling Plan Stratification
stratification allows:
- more exact characterisation of population
- increase of representativeness of results
- in the strata should exist a very homogenous
structure, but different strata should differ as clear as
possible

stratification takes place according to:


- socio-economic criteria (age-, education-, economy)
- settlement criteria (settlement density)
- waste management criteria
(collection system, fee system)
17

La Molina 2016

Erwin Binner

Waste Separation Analysis (WSA)


Calculation
extrapolation of data
simple estimation: direct calculation from average of
increment on average of population
estimation including rates: dependence of
command variable from another measurement is used.
Base mostly is number of inhabitants (I)
stratified increments need a stepwise calculation:
first in strata (i to n), second to population by share of
stratum (s)

meanpop =

mean1*s1+mean2*s2+..+meann*sn
spop

s (share of stratum) may be based on inhabitants or mass or

18

Erwin Binner

ABF-BOKU / Erwin Binner

La Molina 2016

page 9

5. Congreso Residuos Slidos en el Peru


Characterisation of Waste

September 2016

Waste Separation Analysis (WSA)


Uncertainties
limits and disadvantages
huge effort in labour
sorting residue remains (not classifiable fines)
fractions with low share (e.g.: batteries) are estimated
very roughly (by chance!)
difficulties in homogenisation for physical/chemical
analyses
limited comparability because of different modi
operandi in praxis (STANDARDISATION is limited
because of variable local conditions and questions,)

19

Erwin Binner

La Molina 2016

Waste Separation Analysis (WSA)


Example MSW Composition

20

question: composition of residual waste in multi


dwellings in the surrounding of Vienna
10 multi dwelling buildings with in average
63 households and 149 inhabitants
collection system: kerbside collection of residual
waste, biogenous waste, waste paper and yellow bag
(packaging material)
time frame:
classification campaigns from beginning of May to
beginning of July1999. Additional from May 1999 to
June 2000 the filling degree of residual waste bins and
bins for recyclables was estimated.
level of access:
waste bins ready for collection (120 l, 240 l, 770 l or 1100 l)
Erwin Binner

ABF-BOKU / Erwin Binner

La Molina 2016

page 10

5. Congreso Residuos Slidos en el Peru


Characterisation of Waste

September 2016

Waste Separation Analysis (WSA)


Example MSW Composition
fractions (components) for sorting:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.

paper/cardboard
wood
leather/rubber/textiles
plastic packaging
plastic non packaging
compounds packaging
a) beverages
b) others
7. compounds non pack.
8. sanitary products

21

Erwin Binner

9. biogenous waste
10. food waste
a) proper for bio-bin
b) not for bio-bin
11. mineral
12. metals packaging
13. metals non packaging
14. glass packaging
15. glass non packaging
16. WEEE (electric/electronic)
17. Fines (0-40 mm)
La Molina 2016

Waste Separation Analysis (WSA)


Example Procedure
sieving <40mm
+ data collection

scale
sorting table
scale

22

Erwin Binner

ABF-BOKU / Erwin Binner

fractions

source: ABF-BOKU
La Molina 2016

page 11

5. Congreso Residuos Slidos en el Peru


Characterisation of Waste

September 2016

Waste Separation Analysis (WSA)


Example MSW Composition
fraction / component

23

share mass%

paper, cardboard
wood
leather, rubber, textiles
plastic (packaging)
plastic (non packaging)
compounds (beverage packaging)
compounds (other packaging)
compounds (non packaging)
sanitary products
biogenous wastes
food wastes (proper for bio bin)
food wastes (not for bio-bin)
mineral wastes
metal (packaging)
metal (non packaging)
glass (packaging)
problematic wastes (hazard. waste from households)
WEEE (electric/electronic)
fines (0-40 mm)

9.5 %
1.2 %
5.5 %
4.7 %
1.3 %
1.0 %
1.9 %
1.9 %
12.5 %
22.5 %
9.2 %
2.4 %
3.0 %
1.8 %
1.1 %
3.3 %
0.8 %
0.5 %
15.8 %

sum
Erwin Binner

100
La %
Molina 2016

Waste Separation Analysis (WSA)


Setting

24

Erwin Binner
photo: ABF-BOKU

ABF-BOKU / Erwin Binner

La Molina 2016

page 12

5. Congreso Residuos Slidos en el Peru


Characterisation of Waste

September 2016

Waste Separation Analysis (WSA)


Sorting Table

25

Erwin Binner

La Molina 2016
photo: ABF-BOKU

Waste Separation Analysis (WSA)


Sieving

26

Erwin Binner

ABF-BOKU / Erwin Binner

La Molina 2016
photos: ABF-BOKU

page 13

5. Congreso Residuos Slidos en el Peru


Characterisation of Waste

September 2016

Waste Separation Analysis (WSA)

27

Erwin Binner
photo: ABF-BOKU

La Molina 2016

Waste Separation Analysis (WSA)


Classification (Manual Sorting)

28

Erwin Binner
photo: ABF-BOKU

ABF-BOKU / Erwin Binner

La Molina 2016

page 14

5. Congreso Residuos Slidos en el Peru


Characterisation of Waste

September 2016

Waste Separation Analysis (WSA)


Classification (Manual Sorting)

29

Erwin Binner
photo: ABF-BOKU

La Molina 2016

Waste Separation Analysis (WSA)


Fraction 20 40 mm

photos: ABF-BOKU

30

Erwin Binner

ABF-BOKU / Erwin Binner

La Molina 2016

page 15

5. Congreso Residuos Slidos en el Peru


Characterisation of Waste

September 2016

Waste Separation Analysis (WSA)


Fractions (e.g. 26 different fractions)

31

La Molina 2016

Erwin Binner
photos: ABF-BOKU

e.binner@boku.ac.at
http://www.wau.boku.ac.at

Muchas
Gracias por
Su Atencin
32

Erwin Binner

ABF-BOKU / Erwin Binner

La Molina 2016

page 16

5. Congreso Residuos Slidos en el Peru


Characterisation of Waste

September 2016

Waste Separation Analysis (WSA)


Literature
ASTM International (2003): Standard Test Method for Determination of the
Composition of Unprocessed Municipal Solid Waste. In: ASTM D5231-92. American
Society for Testing and Materials, US
Austrian Standard (2005): OE-NORM S2097 part 1-4, Sortieranalyse von Abfllen.
Austrian Standards Institute
Dahlen L. and Lagerkvist A. (2008): Methods for household waste composition
studies. Waste Management 28 (2008), pp. 11001112
European Commission (2004): Methodology for the analysis of solid waste (SWAtool), 5th Framework Program, Vienna, Austria. <http://www.wastesolutions.org>
Maystre L.Y. and Viret F. (1995): A goal-oriented characterization of urban waste.
Waste Management and Research 13 (3), pp. 207
Nordtest (1995): Solid waste, municipal: sampling and characterisation. Nordtest
method NT ENVIR 001, Finland. <www.nordtest.org>
Sharma M. and McBean E. (2007): A methodology for solid waste characterization
based on diminishing marginal returns. Waste Management 27 (3), pp. 337344
Zeng Y., Trauth K.M., Peyton R.L., Banerji S.K. (2005): Estimation of solid waste
composition using two-way stratification and optimum sample size theory and a
case study. Solid Waste Technology and Management 31 (4), pp.198213

33

Erwin Binner

ABF-BOKU / Erwin Binner

La Molina 2016

page 17

Vous aimerez peut-être aussi