REPLAS

Frequencies

Notes
Output Created

10-Dec-2015 04:50:23

Comments
Input

Active Dataset

DataSet0

Filter

<none>

Weight

<none>

Split File

<none>

N of Rows in Working Data File

Missing Value Handling

Definition of Missing

66
User-defined missing values are treated as
missing.

Cases Used

Statistics are based on all cases with valid

data.

Syntax

FREQUENCIES VARIABLES=Replas
usiaibu RiwKuret Kerja Paritas Interval
/NTILES=4
/STATISTICS=MINIMUM MAXIMUM MEAN
MEDIAN MODE SUM
/ORDER=ANALYSIS.

Resources

[DataSet0]

Processor Time

0:00:00.000

Elapsed Time

0:00:00.000

Statistics
Retensio Placenta
N

Valid

Usia Ibu

Riw. Kuret

Kerja

Paritas

Jarak Hamil

66

66

66

66

66

66

Mean

1.50

1.68

1.86

1.64

1.65

1.80

Median

1.50

2.00

2.00

2.00

2.00

2.00

1a

Minimum

Maximum

99

111

123

108

109

119

25

1.00

1.00

2.00

1.00

1.00

2.00

50

1.50

2.00

2.00

2.00

2.00

2.00

75

2.00

2.00

2.00

2.00

2.00

2.00

Missing

Mode

Sum
Percentiles

a. Multiple modes exist. The smallest value is shown

Frequency Table

Retensio Placenta
Frequency
Valid

Percent

Valid Percent

Cumulative Percent

ya

33

50.0

50.0

50.0

tdk

33

50.0

50.0

100.0

Total

66

100.0

100.0

Usia Ibu
Frequency
Valid

Percent

Valid Percent

Cumulative Percent

Resiko (<20, >35)

21

31.8

31.8

31.8

Tdk (20-35th)

45

68.2

68.2

100.0

Total

66

100.0

100.0

Riw. Kuret
Frequency
Valid

Percent

Valid Percent

Cumulative Percent

Ya

13.6

13.6

13.6

Tdk

57

86.4

86.4

100.0

Total

66

100.0

100.0

Kerja
Frequency
Valid

Percent

Valid Percent

Cumulative Percent

Ya

24

36.4

36.4

36.4

Tdk

42

63.6

63.6

100.0

Total

66

100.0

100.0

Paritas
Frequency
Valid

Percent

Valid Percent

Cumulative Percent

Resiko (>3)

23

34.8

34.8

34.8

Tdk (<3)

43

65.2

65.2

100.0

Total

66

100.0

100.0

Jarak Hamil
Frequency
Valid

Percent

Valid Percent

Cumulative Percent

Resiko (<2th)

13

19.7

19.7

19.7

Tdk (>2th)

53

80.3

80.3

100.0

Total

66

100.0

100.0

CROSSTABS
/TABLES=usiaibu RiwKuret Kerja Paritas Interval BY Replas
ROW COLUMN TOTAL
/COUNT ROUND CELL.

Crosstabs

/FORMAT=AVALUE TABLES

/STATISTICS=CHISQ RISK

/CELLS=COUNT

Notes
Output Created

10-Dec-2015 04:51:14

Comments
Input

Active Dataset

DataSet0

Filter

<none>

Weight

<none>

Split File

<none>

N of Rows in Working Data File

Missing Value Handling

Definition of Missing

66
User-defined missing values are treated as
missing.

Cases Used

Statistics for each table are based on all the

cases with valid data in the specified
range(s) for all variables in each table.

Syntax

CROSSTABS
/TABLES=usiaibu RiwKuret Kerja Paritas
Interval BY Replas
/FORMAT=AVALUE TABLES
/STATISTICS=CHISQ RISK
/CELLS=COUNT ROW COLUMN TOTAL
/COUNT ROUND CELL.

Resources

Processor Time

0:00:00.015

Elapsed Time

0:00:00.016

Dimensions Requested

Cells Available

174762

[DataSet0]

Case Processing Summary

Cases
Valid
N

Missing
Percent

Total

Percent

Percent

Usia Ibu * Retensio Placenta

66

100.0%

.0%

66

100.0%

Riw. Kuret * Retensio Placenta

66

100.0%

.0%

66

100.0%

Kerja * Retensio Placenta

66

100.0%

.0%

66

100.0%

Paritas * Retensio Placenta

66

100.0%

.0%

66

100.0%

Jarak Hamil * Retensio Placenta

66

100.0%

.0%

66

100.0%

Usia Ibu * Retensio Placenta

Crosstab
Retensio Placenta
ya
Usia Ibu

Resiko (<20, >35)

Tdk (20-35th)

Total

Count

tdk

Total

12

21

% within Usia Ibu

42.9%

57.1%

100.0%

% within Retensio Placenta

27.3%

36.4%

31.8%

% of Total

13.6%

18.2%

31.8%

24

21

45

% within Usia Ibu

53.3%

46.7%

100.0%

% within Retensio Placenta

72.7%

63.6%

68.2%

% of Total

36.4%

31.8%

68.2%

33

33

66

50.0%

50.0%

100.0%

100.0%

100.0%

100.0%

50.0%

50.0%

100.0%

Count

Count
% within Usia Ibu
% within Retensio Placenta
% of Total

Chi-Square Tests
Asymp. Sig. (2Value

df

sided)

Exact Sig. (2-sided) Exact Sig. (1-sided)

Pearson Chi-Square

.629a

.428

Continuity Correctionb

.279

.597

Likelihood Ratio

.630

.427

Fisher's Exact Test

Linear-by-Linear Association
N of Valid Cases

.598
.619

.431

66

a. 0 cells (,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 10,50.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

.299

Risk Estimate
95% Confidence Interval
Value
Odds Ratio for Usia Ibu (Resiko

Lower

Upper

.656

.231

1.864

.804

.457

1.413

1.224

.754

1.988

(<20, >35) / Tdk (20-35th))

For cohort Retensio Placenta =
ya
For cohort Retensio Placenta =
tdk
N of Valid Cases

66

Riw. Kuret * Retensio Placenta

Crosstab
Retensio Placenta
ya
Riw. Kuret

Ya

Count

Total

Total

100.0%

.0%

100.0%

% within Retensio Placenta

27.3%

.0%

13.6%

% of Total

13.6%

.0%

13.6%

24

33

57

% within Riw. Kuret

42.1%

57.9%

100.0%

% within Retensio Placenta

72.7%

100.0%

86.4%

% of Total

36.4%

50.0%

86.4%

33

33

66

50.0%

50.0%

100.0%

100.0%

100.0%

100.0%

50.0%

50.0%

100.0%

% within Riw. Kuret

Tdk

tdk

Count

Count
% within Riw. Kuret
% within Retensio Placenta
% of Total

Chi-Square Tests
Asymp. Sig. (2Value
Pearson Chi-Square
Continuity Correctionb
Likelihood Ratio

df

sided)

Exact Sig. (2-sided) Exact Sig. (1-sided)

10.421a

.001

8.234

.004

13.904

.000

Fisher's Exact Test

.002

Linear-by-Linear Association

10.263

N of Valid Cases

.001

66

a. 2 cells (50,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 4,50.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

Risk Estimate
95% Confidence Interval
Value
For cohort Retensio Placenta =

Lower

2.375

Upper

1.752

3.220

ya
N of Valid Cases

66

Kerja * Retensio Placenta

Crosstab
Retensio Placenta
ya
Kerja

Ya

Tdk

Total

Count

tdk

Total

14

10

24

% within Kerja

58.3%

41.7%

100.0%

% within Retensio Placenta

42.4%

30.3%

36.4%

% of Total

21.2%

15.2%

36.4%

19

23

42

% within Kerja

45.2%

54.8%

100.0%

% within Retensio Placenta

57.6%

69.7%

63.6%

% of Total

28.8%

34.8%

63.6%

33

33

66

50.0%

50.0%

100.0%

100.0%

100.0%

100.0%

50.0%

50.0%

100.0%

Count

Count
% within Kerja
% within Retensio Placenta
% of Total

.001

Chi-Square Tests
Asymp. Sig. (2Value
Pearson Chi-Square

df

sided)

Exact Sig. (2-sided) Exact Sig. (1-sided)

1.048a

.306

.589

.443

1.051

.305

Continuity Correctionb
Likelihood Ratio
Fisher's Exact Test

.443

Linear-by-Linear Association

1.032

N of Valid Cases

.310

66

a. 0 cells (,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 12,00.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

Risk Estimate
95% Confidence Interval
Value

Lower

Upper

Odds Ratio for Kerja (Ya / Tdk)

1.695

.615

4.671

For cohort Retensio Placenta =

1.289

.802

2.072

.761

.440

1.315

ya
For cohort Retensio Placenta =
tdk
N of Valid Cases

Paritas * Retensio Placenta

66

.222

Crosstab
Retensio Placenta
ya
Paritas

Resiko (>3)

Tdk (<3)

Total

Count

tdk

Total

17

23

% within Paritas

73.9%

26.1%

100.0%

% within Retensio Placenta

51.5%

18.2%

34.8%

% of Total

25.8%

9.1%

34.8%

16

27

43

% within Paritas

37.2%

62.8%

100.0%

% within Retensio Placenta

48.5%

81.8%

65.2%

% of Total

24.2%

40.9%

65.2%

33

33

66

50.0%

50.0%

100.0%

100.0%

100.0%

100.0%

50.0%

50.0%

100.0%

Count

Count
% within Paritas
% within Retensio Placenta
% of Total

Chi-Square Tests
Asymp. Sig. (2Value

df

sided)

Exact Sig. (2-sided) Exact Sig. (1-sided)

Pearson Chi-Square

8.075a

.004

Continuity Correctionb

6.673

.010

Likelihood Ratio

8.328

.004

Fisher's Exact Test

Linear-by-Linear Association
N of Valid Cases

.009
7.952

.005

66

a. 0 cells (,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 11,50.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

.005

Risk Estimate
95% Confidence Interval
Value
Odds Ratio for Paritas (Resiko

Lower

Upper

4.781

1.564

14.616

1.986

1.257

3.140

.415

.201

.858

(>3) / Tdk (<3))

For cohort Retensio Placenta =
ya
For cohort Retensio Placenta =
tdk
N of Valid Cases

66

Jarak Hamil * Retensio Placenta

Crosstab
Retensio Placenta
ya
Jarak Hamil

Resiko (<2th)

Tdk (>2th)

Total

Count

tdk

Total

13

% within Jarak Hamil

61.5%

38.5%

100.0%

% within Retensio Placenta

24.2%

15.2%

19.7%

% of Total

12.1%

7.6%

19.7%

25

28

53

% within Jarak Hamil

47.2%

52.8%

100.0%

% within Retensio Placenta

75.8%

84.8%

80.3%

% of Total

37.9%

42.4%

80.3%

33

33

66

50.0%

50.0%

100.0%

100.0%

100.0%

100.0%

50.0%

50.0%

100.0%

Count

Count
% within Jarak Hamil
% within Retensio Placenta
% of Total

Chi-Square Tests
Asymp. Sig. (2Value

df

sided)

Exact Sig. (2-sided) Exact Sig. (1-sided)

Pearson Chi-Square

.862a

.353

Continuity Correctionb

.383

.536

Likelihood Ratio

.868

.351

Fisher's Exact Test

Linear-by-Linear Association

.537
.849

N of Valid Cases

.357

66

a. 0 cells (,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 6,50.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

Risk Estimate
95% Confidence Interval
Value
Odds Ratio for Jarak Hamil

Lower

Upper

1.792

.518

6.197

1.305

.779

2.185

.728

.350

1.515

(Resiko (<2th) / Tdk (>2th))

For cohort Retensio Placenta =
ya
For cohort Retensio Placenta =
tdk
N of Valid Cases

ASFIXIA
Frequencies

66

.269

Notes
Output Created

10-Dec-2015 05:28:15

Comments
Input

Active Dataset

DataSet0

Filter

<none>

Weight

<none>

Split File

<none>

N of Rows in Working Data File

Missing Value Handling

Definition of Missing

172
User-defined missing values are treated as
missing.

Cases Used

Statistics are based on all cases with valid

data.

Syntax

FREQUENCIES VARIABLES=Asfixia usia

Paritas Riwperdarahan Anemia Partuslama
Kerja
/NTILES=4
/STATISTICS=STDDEV VARIANCE
MINIMUM MAXIMUM MEAN MEDIAN
MODE SUM
/ORDER=ANALYSIS.

Resources

[DataSet0]

Processor Time

0:00:00.015

Elapsed Time

0:00:00.015

Statistics
Riw Perdarahan
Asfixia
N

Valid

usia Ibu

Paritas

ante partum

Anemia

Partus Lama

Kerja

172

172

172

172

172

172

172

Mean

1.50

1.74

1.68

1.87

1.80

1.86

1.85

Median

1.50

2.00

2.00

2.00

2.00

2.00

2.00

1a

Std. Deviation

.501

.441

.468

.341

.399

.348

.359

Variance

.251

.194

.219

.117

.160

.121

.129

Minimum

Maximum

258

299

289

321

310

320

318

25

1.00

1.00

1.00

2.00

2.00

2.00

2.00

50

1.50

2.00

2.00

2.00

2.00

2.00

2.00

75

2.00

2.00

2.00

2.00

2.00

2.00

2.00

Missing

Mode

Sum
Percentiles

a. Multiple modes exist. The smallest value is shown

Frequency Table

Asfixia
Frequency
Valid

Percent

Valid Percent

Cumulative Percent

ya

86

50.0

50.0

50.0

tdk

86

50.0

50.0

100.0

172

100.0

100.0

Total

usia Ibu
Frequency
Valid

resiko (<20, >35)

Percent

Valid Percent

Cumulative Percent

45

26.2

26.2

26.2

tdk

127

73.8

73.8

100.0

Total

172

100.0

100.0

Paritas
Frequency
Valid

Resiko (>3)

Percent

Valid Percent

Cumulative Percent

55

32.0

32.0

32.0

tdk

117

68.0

68.0

100.0

Total

172

100.0

100.0

Riw Perdarahan ante partum

Frequency
Valid

Percent

Valid Percent

Cumulative Percent

Ya

23

13.4

13.4

13.4

tdk

149

86.6

86.6

100.0

Total

172

100.0

100.0

Anemia
Frequency
Valid

Percent

Valid Percent

Cumulative Percent

Ya

34

19.8

19.8

19.8

tdk

138

80.2

80.2

100.0

Total

172

100.0

100.0

Partus Lama
Frequency
Valid

Percent

Valid Percent

Cumulative Percent

Ya

24

14.0

14.0

14.0

Tdk

148

86.0

86.0

100.0

Total

172

100.0

100.0

Kerja
Frequency
Valid

Percent

Valid Percent

Cumulative Percent

Ya

26

15.1

15.1

15.1

Tdk

146

84.9

84.9

100.0

Total

172

100.0

100.0

CROSSTABS
/TABLES=usia Paritas Riwperdarahan Anemia Partuslama Kerja BY Asfixia
/CELLS=COUNT ROW COLUMN TOTAL
/COUNT ROUND CELL.

Crosstabs

/FORMAT=AVALUE TABLES

/STATISTICS=CHISQ RISK

Notes
Output Created

10-Dec-2015 05:28:53

Comments
Input

Active Dataset

DataSet0

Filter

<none>

Weight

<none>

Split File

<none>

N of Rows in Working Data File

Missing Value Handling

Definition of Missing

172
User-defined missing values are treated as
missing.

Cases Used

Statistics for each table are based on all the

cases with valid data in the specified
range(s) for all variables in each table.

Syntax

CROSSTABS
/TABLES=usia Paritas Riwperdarahan
Anemia Partuslama Kerja BY Asfixia
/FORMAT=AVALUE TABLES
/STATISTICS=CHISQ RISK
/CELLS=COUNT ROW COLUMN TOTAL
/COUNT ROUND CELL.

Resources

Processor Time

0:00:00.015

Elapsed Time

0:00:00.015

Dimensions Requested

Cells Available

174762

[DataSet0]

Case Processing Summary

Cases
Valid
N

Missing
Percent

Total

Percent

Percent

usia Ibu * Asfixia

172

100.0%

.0%

172

100.0%

Paritas * Asfixia

172

100.0%

.0%

172

100.0%

Riw Perdarahan ante partum *

172

100.0%

.0%

172

100.0%

Anemia * Asfixia

172

100.0%

.0%

172

100.0%

Partus Lama * Asfixia

172

100.0%

.0%

172

100.0%

Kerja * Asfixia

172

100.0%

.0%

172

100.0%

Asfixia

usia Ibu * Asfixia

Crosstab
Asfixia
ya
usia Ibu

resiko (<20, >35)

tdk

Total

tdk

Count

Total

25

20

45

% within usia Ibu

55.6%

44.4%

100.0%

% within Asfixia

29.1%

23.3%

26.2%

% of Total

14.5%

11.6%

26.2%

61

66

127

% within usia Ibu

48.0%

52.0%

100.0%

% within Asfixia

70.9%

76.7%

73.8%

% of Total

35.5%

38.4%

73.8%

86

86

172

50.0%

50.0%

100.0%

100.0%

100.0%

100.0%

50.0%

50.0%

100.0%

Count

Count
% within usia Ibu
% within Asfixia
% of Total

Chi-Square Tests
Asymp. Sig. (2Value

df

sided)

Exact Sig. (2-sided) Exact Sig. (1-sided)

Pearson Chi-Square

.752a

.386

Continuity Correctionb

.482

.488

Likelihood Ratio

.754

.385

Fisher's Exact Test

.488

Linear-by-Linear Association

.748

N of Valid Cases

172

.387

a. 0 cells (,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 22,50.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

.244

Risk Estimate
95% Confidence Interval
Value
Odds Ratio for usia Ibu (resiko

Lower

Upper

1.352

.683

2.678

For cohort Asfixia = ya

1.157

.842

1.589

For cohort Asfixia = tdk

.855

.593

1.234

N of Valid Cases

172

(<20, >35) / tdk)

Paritas * Asfixia

Crosstab
Asfixia
ya
Paritas

Resiko (>3)

tdk

Total

Count

tdk

Total

37

18

55

% within Paritas

67.3%

32.7%

100.0%

% within Asfixia

43.0%

20.9%

32.0%

% of Total

21.5%

10.5%

32.0%

49

68

117

% within Paritas

41.9%

58.1%

100.0%

% within Asfixia

57.0%

79.1%

68.0%

% of Total

28.5%

39.5%

68.0%

86

86

172

% within Paritas

50.0%

50.0%

100.0%

% within Asfixia

100.0%

100.0%

100.0%

50.0%

50.0%

100.0%

Count

Count

% of Total

Chi-Square Tests
Asymp. Sig. (2Value

df

sided)

Exact Sig. (2-sided) Exact Sig. (1-sided)

Pearson Chi-Square

9.649a

.002

Continuity Correctionb

8.660

.003

Likelihood Ratio

9.800

.002

Fisher's Exact Test

Linear-by-Linear Association

.003
9.593

N of Valid Cases

.002

172

a. 0 cells (,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 27,50.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

Risk Estimate
95% Confidence Interval
Value
Odds Ratio for Paritas (Resiko

Lower

Upper

2.853

1.456

5.588

For cohort Asfixia = ya

1.606

1.212

2.130

For cohort Asfixia = tdk

.563

.374

.848

N of Valid Cases

172

(>3) / tdk)

Riw Perdarahan ante partum * Asfixia

.002

Crosstab
Asfixia
ya
Riw Perdarahan ante partum

Ya

tdk

Count

Total

17

23

73.9%

26.1%

100.0%

19.8%

7.0%

13.4%

9.9%

3.5%

13.4%

69

80

149

46.3%

53.7%

100.0%

% within Asfixia

80.2%

93.0%

86.6%

% of Total

40.1%

46.5%

86.6%

86

86

172

50.0%

50.0%

100.0%

100.0%

100.0%

100.0%

50.0%

50.0%

100.0%

% within Riw Perdarahan ante

partum
% within Asfixia
% of Total
tdk

Count
% within Riw Perdarahan ante
partum

Total

Count
% within Riw Perdarahan ante
partum
% within Asfixia
% of Total

Chi-Square Tests
Asymp. Sig. (2Value

df

sided)

Exact Sig. (2-sided) Exact Sig. (1-sided)

Pearson Chi-Square

6.073a

.014

Continuity Correctionb

5.019

.025

Likelihood Ratio

6.295

.012

Fisher's Exact Test

Linear-by-Linear Association
N of Valid Cases

.023
6.038

.014

172

a. 0 cells (,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 11,50.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

.012

Risk Estimate
95% Confidence Interval
Value
Odds Ratio for Riw Perdarahan

Lower

Upper

3.285

1.227

8.795

For cohort Asfixia = ya

1.596

1.185

2.150

For cohort Asfixia = tdk

.486

.240

.982

N of Valid Cases

172

ante partum (Ya / tdk)

Anemia * Asfixia

Crosstab
Asfixia
ya
Anemia

Ya

tdk

Total

Count

tdk

Total

27

34

% within Anemia

79.4%

20.6%

100.0%

% within Asfixia

31.4%

8.1%

19.8%

% of Total

15.7%

4.1%

19.8%

59

79

138

% within Anemia

42.8%

57.2%

100.0%

% within Asfixia

68.6%

91.9%

80.2%

% of Total

34.3%

45.9%

80.2%

86

86

172

% within Anemia

50.0%

50.0%

100.0%

% within Asfixia

100.0%

100.0%

100.0%

50.0%

50.0%

100.0%

Count

Count

% of Total

Chi-Square Tests
Asymp. Sig. (2Value

df

sided)

Exact Sig. (2-sided) Exact Sig. (1-sided)

Pearson Chi-Square

14.663a

.000

Continuity Correctionb

13.234

.000

Likelihood Ratio

15.468

.000

Fisher's Exact Test

.000

Linear-by-Linear Association

14.578

N of Valid Cases

.000

172

a. 0 cells (,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 17,00.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

Risk Estimate
95% Confidence Interval
Value

Lower

Upper

Odds Ratio for Anemia (Ya / tdk)

5.165

2.106

12.666

For cohort Asfixia = ya

1.857

1.435

2.404

For cohort Asfixia = tdk

.360

.183

.707

N of Valid Cases

172

Partus Lama * Asfixia

.000

Crosstab
Asfixia
ya
Partus Lama

Ya

Count

Total

Total

16

24

% within Partus Lama

66.7%

33.3%

100.0%

% within Asfixia

18.6%

9.3%

14.0%

9.3%

4.7%

14.0%

70

78

148

% within Partus Lama

47.3%

52.7%

100.0%

% within Asfixia

81.4%

90.7%

86.0%

% of Total

40.7%

45.3%

86.0%

86

86

172

50.0%

50.0%

100.0%

100.0%

100.0%

100.0%

50.0%

50.0%

100.0%

% of Total
Tdk

tdk

Count

Count
% within Partus Lama
% within Asfixia
% of Total

Chi-Square Tests
Asymp. Sig. (2Value

df

sided)

Exact Sig. (2-sided) Exact Sig. (1-sided)

Pearson Chi-Square

3.099a

.078

Continuity Correctionb

2.373

.123

Likelihood Ratio

3.151

.076

Fisher's Exact Test

.122

Linear-by-Linear Association

3.081

N of Valid Cases

.079

172

a. 0 cells (,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 12,00.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

Risk Estimate
95% Confidence Interval
Value
Odds Ratio for Partus Lama (Ya /

Lower

Upper

2.229

.899

5.525

For cohort Asfixia = ya

1.410

1.013

1.961

For cohort Asfixia = tdk

.632

.352

1.136

N of Valid Cases

172

Tdk)

.061

Kerja * Asfixia

Crosstab
Asfixia
ya
Kerja

Ya

Count

Total

Total

16

10

26

% within Kerja

61.5%

38.5%

100.0%

% within Asfixia

18.6%

11.6%

15.1%

9.3%

5.8%

15.1%

70

76

146

% within Kerja

47.9%

52.1%

100.0%

% within Asfixia

81.4%

88.4%

84.9%

% of Total

40.7%

44.2%

84.9%

86

86

172

% within Kerja

50.0%

50.0%

100.0%

% within Asfixia

100.0%

100.0%

100.0%

50.0%

50.0%

100.0%

% of Total
Tdk

tdk

Count

Count

% of Total

Chi-Square Tests
Asymp. Sig. (2Value

df

sided)

Exact Sig. (2-sided) Exact Sig. (1-sided)

Pearson Chi-Square

1.631a

.202

Continuity Correctionb

1.133

.287

Likelihood Ratio

1.644

.200

Fisher's Exact Test

Linear-by-Linear Association
N of Valid Cases

.287
1.622

.203

172

a. 0 cells (,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 13,00.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

.144

Risk Estimate
95% Confidence Interval
Value

Lower

Upper

Odds Ratio for Kerja (Ya / Tdk)

1.737

.739

4.081

For cohort Asfixia = ya

1.284

.907

1.817

For cohort Asfixia = tdk

.739

.443

1.231

N of Valid Cases

172

PEB
Frequencies

Notes
Output Created

13-Dec-2015 03:32:01

Comments
Input

Active Dataset

DataSet0

Filter

<none>

Weight

<none>

Split File

<none>

N of Rows in Working Data File

Missing Value Handling

Definition of Missing

292
User-defined missing values are treated as
missing.

Cases Used

Statistics are based on all cases with valid

data.

Syntax

FREQUENCIES VARIABLES=PEB Usia

Paritas BB Genetik Kerja ANC
/NTILES=4
/STATISTICS=MINIMUM MAXIMUM MEAN
MEDIAN MODE SUM
/ORDER=ANALYSIS.

Resources

[DataSet0]

Processor Time

0:00:00.016

Elapsed Time

0:00:00.016

Statistics
PEB
N

Valid

Usia Ibu

Paritas

BB Ibu

Riw Genetik

Kerka

Patuh ANC

292

292

292

292

292

292

292

Mean

1.52

1.71

1.80

1.88

1.94

1.84

1.80

Median

2.00

2.00

2.00

2.00

2.00

2.00

2.00

Mode

Minimum

Maximum

445

500

527

549

567

536

525

25

1.00

1.00

2.00

2.00

2.00

2.00

2.00

50

2.00

2.00

2.00

2.00

2.00

2.00

2.00

75

2.00

2.00

2.00

2.00

2.00

2.00

2.00

Missing

Sum
Percentiles

Frequency Table

PEB
Frequency
Valid

Percent

Valid Percent

Cumulative Percent

ya

139

47.6

47.6

47.6

tdk

153

52.4

52.4

100.0

Total

292

100.0

100.0

Usia Ibu
Frequency
Valid

Resiko

Percent

Valid Percent

Cumulative Percent

84

28.8

28.8

28.8

Tdk

208

71.2

71.2

100.0

Total

292

100.0

100.0

Paritas
Frequency
Valid

Resiko

Percent

Valid Percent

Cumulative Percent

57

19.5

19.5

19.5

Tdk

235

80.5

80.5

100.0

Total

292

100.0

100.0

BB Ibu
Frequency
Valid

Over

Percent

Valid Percent

Cumulative Percent

35

12.0

12.0

12.0

Normal

257

88.0

88.0

100.0

Total

292

100.0

100.0

Riw Genetik
Frequency
Valid

Percent

Valid Percent

Cumulative Percent

Ya

17

5.8

5.8

5.8

Tdk

275

94.2

94.2

100.0

Total

292

100.0

100.0

Kerka
Frequency
Valid

Percent

Valid Percent

Cumulative Percent

ya

48

16.4

16.4

16.4

tdk

244

83.6

83.6

100.0

Total

292

100.0

100.0

Patuh ANC
Frequency
Valid

Percent

Valid Percent

Cumulative Percent

Tdk

59

20.2

20.2

20.2

Ya

233

79.8

79.8

100.0

Total

292

100.0

100.0

CROSSTABS
/TABLES=Usia Paritas BB Genetik Kerja ANC BY PEB
TOTAL
/COUNT ROUND CELL.

Crosstabs

/FORMAT=AVALUE TABLES

/STATISTICS=CHISQ RISK

/CELLS=COUNT ROW COLUMN

Notes
Output Created

13-Dec-2015 03:32:53

Comments
Input

Active Dataset

DataSet0

Filter

<none>

Weight

<none>

Split File

<none>

N of Rows in Working Data File

Missing Value Handling

Definition of Missing

292
User-defined missing values are treated as
missing.

Cases Used

Statistics for each table are based on all the

cases with valid data in the specified
range(s) for all variables in each table.

Syntax

CROSSTABS
/TABLES=Usia Paritas BB Genetik Kerja
ANC BY PEB
/FORMAT=AVALUE TABLES
/STATISTICS=CHISQ RISK
/CELLS=COUNT ROW COLUMN TOTAL
/COUNT ROUND CELL.

Resources

Processor Time

0:00:00.015

Elapsed Time

0:00:00.031

Dimensions Requested

Cells Available

174762

[DataSet0]

Case Processing Summary

Cases
Valid
N

Missing
Percent

Total

Percent

Percent

Usia Ibu * PEB

292

100.0%

.0%

292

100.0%

Paritas * PEB

292

100.0%

.0%

292

100.0%

BB Ibu * PEB

292

100.0%

.0%

292

100.0%

Riw Genetik * PEB

292

100.0%

.0%

292

100.0%

Kerka * PEB

292

100.0%

.0%

292

100.0%

Patuh ANC * PEB

292

100.0%

.0%

292

100.0%

Usia Ibu * PEB

Crosstab
PEB
ya
Usia Ibu

Resiko

Tdk

Total

Count

tdk

Total

44

40

84

% within Usia Ibu

52.4%

47.6%

100.0%

% within PEB

31.7%

26.1%

28.8%

% of Total

15.1%

13.7%

28.8%

95

113

208

% within Usia Ibu

45.7%

54.3%

100.0%

% within PEB

68.3%

73.9%

71.2%

% of Total

32.5%

38.7%

71.2%

139

153

292

47.6%

52.4%

100.0%

100.0%

100.0%

100.0%

47.6%

52.4%

100.0%

Count

Count
% within Usia Ibu
% within PEB
% of Total

Chi-Square Tests
Asymp. Sig. (2Value
Pearson Chi-Square
Continuity Correctionb
Likelihood Ratio

df

sided)

Exact Sig. (2-sided) Exact Sig. (1-sided)

1.079a

.299

.827

.363

1.079

.299

Fisher's Exact Test

Linear-by-Linear Association
N of Valid Cases

.304
1.076

.300

292

a. 0 cells (,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 39,99.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

.182

Risk Estimate
95% Confidence Interval
Value
Odds Ratio for Usia Ibu (Resiko /

Lower

Upper

1.308

.787

2.174

For cohort PEB = ya

1.147

.891

1.476

For cohort PEB = tdk

.877

.678

1.133

N of Valid Cases

292

Tdk)

Paritas * PEB

Crosstab
PEB
ya
Paritas

Resiko

Count

Total

Total

25

32

57

% within Paritas

43.9%

56.1%

100.0%

% within PEB

18.0%

20.9%

19.5%

8.6%

11.0%

19.5%

114

121

235

% within Paritas

48.5%

51.5%

100.0%

% within PEB

82.0%

79.1%

80.5%

% of Total

39.0%

41.4%

80.5%

139

153

292

47.6%

52.4%

100.0%

100.0%

100.0%

100.0%

47.6%

52.4%

100.0%

% of Total
Tdk

tdk

Count

Count
% within Paritas
% within PEB
% of Total

Chi-Square Tests
Asymp. Sig. (2Value

df

sided)

Exact Sig. (2-sided) Exact Sig. (1-sided)

Pearson Chi-Square

.398a

.528

Continuity Correctionb

.233

.629

Likelihood Ratio

.399

.528

Fisher's Exact Test

.557

Linear-by-Linear Association

.396

N of Valid Cases

292

.529

a. 0 cells (,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 27,13.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

Risk Estimate
95% Confidence Interval
Value
Odds Ratio for Paritas (Resiko /

Lower

Upper

.829

.463

1.485

For cohort PEB = ya

.904

.655

1.247

For cohort PEB = tdk

1.090

.840

1.415

Tdk)

N of Valid Cases

BB Ibu * PEB

292

.315

Crosstab
PEB
ya
BB Ibu

Over

Count

Total

Total

24

11

35

% within BB Ibu

68.6%

31.4%

100.0%

% within PEB

17.3%

7.2%

12.0%

8.2%

3.8%

12.0%

115

142

257

% within BB Ibu

44.7%

55.3%

100.0%

% within PEB

82.7%

92.8%

88.0%

% of Total

39.4%

48.6%

88.0%

139

153

292

47.6%

52.4%

100.0%

100.0%

100.0%

100.0%

47.6%

52.4%

100.0%

% of Total
Normal

tdk

Count

Count
% within BB Ibu
% within PEB
% of Total

Chi-Square Tests
Asymp. Sig. (2Value

df

sided)

Exact Sig. (2-sided) Exact Sig. (1-sided)

Pearson Chi-Square

7.010a

.008

Continuity Correctionb

6.087

.014

Likelihood Ratio

7.117

.008

Fisher's Exact Test

Linear-by-Linear Association

.011
6.986

N of Valid Cases

.008

292

a. 0 cells (,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 16,66.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

Risk Estimate
95% Confidence Interval
Value
Odds Ratio for BB Ibu (Over /

Lower

Upper

2.694

1.266

5.731

For cohort PEB = ya

1.532

1.179

1.992

For cohort PEB = tdk

.569

.344

.939

N of Valid Cases

292

Normal)

.007

Riw Genetik * PEB

Crosstab
PEB
ya
Riw Genetik

Ya

Count

Total

Total

14

17

% within Riw Genetik

82.4%

17.6%

100.0%

% within PEB

10.1%

2.0%

5.8%

4.8%

1.0%

5.8%

125

150

275

% within Riw Genetik

45.5%

54.5%

100.0%

% within PEB

89.9%

98.0%

94.2%

% of Total

42.8%

51.4%

94.2%

139

153

292

47.6%

52.4%

100.0%

100.0%

100.0%

100.0%

47.6%

52.4%

100.0%

% of Total
Tdk

tdk

Count

Count
% within Riw Genetik
% within PEB
% of Total

Chi-Square Tests
Asymp. Sig. (2Value

df

sided)

Exact Sig. (2-sided) Exact Sig. (1-sided)

Pearson Chi-Square

8.739a

.003

Continuity Correctionb

7.322

.007

Likelihood Ratio

9.327

.002

Fisher's Exact Test

Linear-by-Linear Association
N of Valid Cases

.005
8.709

.003

292

a. 0 cells (,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 8,09.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

.003

Risk Estimate
95% Confidence Interval
Value
Odds Ratio for Riw Genetik (Ya /

Lower

Upper

5.600

1.574

19.928

For cohort PEB = ya

1.812

1.404

2.339

For cohort PEB = tdk

.324

.115

.909

N of Valid Cases

292

Tdk)

Kerka * PEB

Crosstab
PEB
ya
Kerka

ya

tdk

Total

Count

tdk

Total

31

17

48

% within Kerka

64.6%

35.4%

100.0%

% within PEB

22.3%

11.1%

16.4%

% of Total

10.6%

5.8%

16.4%

108

136

244

% within Kerka

44.3%

55.7%

100.0%

% within PEB

77.7%

88.9%

83.6%

% of Total

37.0%

46.6%

83.6%

139

153

292

47.6%

52.4%

100.0%

100.0%

100.0%

100.0%

47.6%

52.4%

100.0%

Count

Count
% within Kerka
% within PEB
% of Total

Chi-Square Tests
Asymp. Sig. (2Value

df

sided)

Exact Sig. (2-sided) Exact Sig. (1-sided)

Pearson Chi-Square

6.640a

.010

Continuity Correctionb

5.851

.016

Likelihood Ratio

6.692

.010

Fisher's Exact Test

Linear-by-Linear Association

.011
6.618

N of Valid Cases

.010

292

a. 0 cells (,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 22,85.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

Risk Estimate
95% Confidence Interval
Value

Lower

Upper

Odds Ratio for Kerka (ya / tdk)

2.296

1.207

4.369

For cohort PEB = ya

1.459

1.134

1.878

For cohort PEB = tdk

.635

.427

.946

N of Valid Cases

292

Patuh ANC * PEB

.008

Crosstab
PEB
ya
Patuh ANC

Tdk

Ya

Total

Count

tdk

Total

38

21

59

% within Patuh ANC

64.4%

35.6%

100.0%

% within PEB

27.3%

13.7%

20.2%

% of Total

13.0%

7.2%

20.2%

101

132

233

% within Patuh ANC

43.3%

56.7%

100.0%

% within PEB

72.7%

86.3%

79.8%

% of Total

34.6%

45.2%

79.8%

139

153

292

47.6%

52.4%

100.0%

100.0%

100.0%

100.0%

47.6%

52.4%

100.0%

Count

Count
% within Patuh ANC
% within PEB
% of Total

Chi-Square Tests
Asymp. Sig. (2Value

df

sided)

Exact Sig. (2-sided) Exact Sig. (1-sided)

Pearson Chi-Square

8.371a

.004

Continuity Correctionb

7.548

.006

Likelihood Ratio

8.434

.004

Fisher's Exact Test

.005

Linear-by-Linear Association

8.342

N of Valid Cases

.004

292

a. 0 cells (,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 28,09.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

Risk Estimate
95% Confidence Interval
Value
Odds Ratio for Patuh ANC (Tdk /

Lower

Upper

2.365

1.308

4.277

For cohort PEB = ya

1.486

1.169

1.889

For cohort PEB = tdk

.628

.438

.902

N of Valid Cases

292

Ya)

.003