Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Instituto de Ciencias Agrarias, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Cientcas, Serrano 115 bis, 28006 Madrid, Spain
Departamento de Ingeniera de Materiales, E.T.S.I. Minas, Universidad Politcnica de Madrid, Ros Rosas 21, 28003 Madrid, Spain
Departamento de Edafologa, E.T.S.I. Agrnomos, Universidad Politcnica de Madrid, Ciudad Universitaria, 28004 Madrid, Spain
H I G H L I G H T S
Biochar does not increase abiotic and biotic soil CO2 emissions from semi-arid soils.
Biochar does not interact with the effects of fertilizers on soil CO2 emissions.
Biochar increases not only organic C but also inorganic C contents in soil.
a r t i c l e
i n f o
Article history:
Received 26 November 2013
Received in revised form 18 February 2014
Accepted 21 February 2014
Available online 15 March 2014
Keywords:
Biochar
Carbonates
Inorganic C
Organic amendment
Mineral fertilizer
Soil organic matter
a b s t r a c t
Semi-arid soils cover a signicant area of Earth's land surface and typically contain large amounts of inorganic C.
Determining the effects of biochar additions on CO2 emissions from semi-arid soils is therefore essential for evaluating the potential of biochar as a climate change mitigation strategy. Here, we measured the CO2 that evolved
from semi-arid calcareous soils amended with biochar at rates of 0 and 20 t ha1 in a full factorial combination
with three different fertilizers (mineral fertilizer, municipal solid waste compost, and sewage sludge) applied at
four rates (equivalent to 0, 75, 150, and 225 kg potentially available N ha1) during 182 days of aerobic incubation. A double exponential model, which describes cumulative CO2 emissions from two active soil C compartments with different turnover rates (one relatively stable and the other more labile), was found to t very well
all the experimental datasets. In general, the organic fertilizers increased the size and decomposition rate of
the stable and labile soil C pools. In contrast, biochar addition had no effects on any of the double exponential
model parameters and did not interact with the effects ascribed to the type and rate of fertilizer. After
182 days of incubation, soil organic and microbial biomass C contents tended to increase with increasing the
application rates of organic fertilizer, especially of compost, whereas increasing the rate of mineral fertilizer
tended to suppress microbial biomass. Biochar was found to increase both organic and inorganic C contents in
soil and not to interact with the effects of type and rate of fertilizer on C fractions. As a whole, our results suggest
that the use of biochar as enhancer of semi-arid soils, either alone or combined with mineral and organic fertilizers, is unlikely to increase abiotic and biotic soil CO2 emissions.
2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
1. Introduction
Biochar, the C-rich solid material obtained from biomass through a
pyrolysis process, has recently gained much attention due to its potential to enhance soil quality and mitigate climate change (Lehmann,
2007; Lehmann and Joseph, 2009). Biochar decomposition rates have
been shown to depend on several factors, such as pyrolysis temperature,
feedstock, particle size, soil type and moisture regime, and presence of
more labile organic substrates, which may promote mineralization
by microbial co-metabolism (Kuzyakov et al., 2009; Nguyen and
Corresponding author. Tel.: +34 91 745 2500x950191.
E-mail address: c.plaza@ica.csic.es (C. Plaza).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.02.103
0048-9697/ 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Table 1
Chemical properties (mean standard error of three laboratory replicates) of the soil, biochar, municipal solid waste compost, and sewage sludge used in this work.
Property
Soil
pH
EC (dS m1)
Total organic C (g kg1)
Inorganic C (g kg1)
Total N (g kg1)
C/N
P (g kg1)
K (g kg1)
Ca (g kg1)
Mg (g kg1)
Na (g kg1)
8.80
0.11
10.0
5.9
1.2
8.3
0.006
0.21
2.93
0.25
0.069
Biochar
0.03
0.00
0.1
0.1
0.0
0.1
0.001
0.02
0.14
0.02
0.006
10.06
2.4
597
14.7
4.1
151
2.0
9.1
52.4
3.5
0.3
0.01
0.0
31
1.6
0.6
18
0.2
0.7
4.0
0.3
0.0
Mineral fertilizer
Compost
4.03 0.01
111.9 1.3
80.9 1.8
70.0 1.9
123.4 5.0
48.4 2.5
3.0 0.0
3.5 0.1
6.79
10.8
295
9.4
16.0
18.45
3.1
6.9
38.2
3.5
4.5
Sewage sludge
0.01
1.0
3
3.8
0.2
0.02
0.2
0.2
1.6
0.2
0.2
7.30
2.2
277
9.3
43.9
6.31
19.2
3.6
30.3
6.2
0.7
0.03
0.2
4
4.0
0.5
0.09
0.8
0.1
0.8
0.1
0.0
1.4
1.2
MF
MF+BC
MC
MC+BC
SS
SS+BC
CO2-C (g kg1)
1.0
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
0.0
6.0
CO2-C (g kg1)
5.0
4.0
3.0
2.0
1.0
0.0
2.5
CO2-C (g kg1)
2.0
1.5
1.0
0.5
0.0
0
40
80
120
Time (days)
160
200
40
80
120
Time (days)
160
200
Fig. 1. Measured (symbols) and model-predicted (lines) cumulative CO2 emissions from soils amended with mineral fertilizer (MF), municipal solid waste compost (MC), and sewage
sludge (SS) at rates equivalent to 0, 75, 150, and 225 t potentially available N ha1 (0, L, M, and H, respectively), without or with biochar at 20 t ha1 (BC), during 182 days of incubation.
Error bars represent standard errors of the means (n = 3).
six different kinetic models and the double exponential model was
found to be the most appropriate to describe C mineralization kinetics
for all the treatments (Fernndez et al., 2007).
Dependent variables were subjected to three-way analysis of
variance. Effects were deemed signicant when P b 0.05. All the statistical analyses were performed with IBM SPSS Statistics, version 21
(Somers, NY).
Table 3
Analysis of variance for sizes and decomposition rates of stable and labile soil C pools
(Cs, ks, Cl, and kl, respectively) estimated by a double exponential model as affected by biochar (0 and 20 t ha1), type of fertilizer (mineral fertilizer, municipal solid waste compost, and sewage sludge), and rate of fertilizer (equivalent to 0, 75, 150, and 225 t
potentially available N ha1).
Source of variation
Cs
ks
Cl
kl
Biochar (B)
Type of fertilizer (F)
Rate of fertilizer (R)
BF
BR
FR
BFR
0.783
b0.001
b0.001
0.991
0.253
b0.001
0.671
0.146
b0.001
0.135
0.967
0.997
0.128
0.979
0.691
b0.001
b0.001
0.956
0.978
b0.001
0.998
0.537
b0.001
0.055
0.996
0.981
0.577
1.000
Table 2
Sizes and decomposition rates of stable and labile C pools estimated by a double exponential model (Cs, ks, Cl, and kl, respectively; mean standard error) in soils amended with mineral
fertilizer (MF), municipal solid waste compost (MC), and sewage sludge (SS) at rates equivalent to 0, 75, 150, and 225 t potentially available N ha1 (0, L, M, and H, respectively), without
or with biochar at 20 t ha1 (BC), and percentage of C (Cs + Cl) that developed on the total C in the various soils after 182 days.
Soil
Cs
ks
1
(g CO2C kg
MF-0
MF-L
MF-M
MF-H
MC-0
MC-L
MC-M
MC-H
SS-0
SS-L
SS-M
SS-H
BC + MF-0
BC + MF-L
BC + MF-M
BC + MF-H
BC + MC-0
BC + MC-L
BC + MC-M
BC + MC-H
BC + SS-0
BC + SS-L
BC + SS-M
BC + SS-H
1.375
1.155
1.182
0.950
1.240
2.305
3.416
4.144
1.204
1.425
1.344
1.473
1.219
1.276
1.160
1.160
1.166
2.315
3.217
4.479
1.169
1.326
1.423
1.470
0.134
0.117
0.078
0.131
0.083
0.035
0.049
0.097
0.087
0.105
0.085
0.086
0.062
0.183
0.168
0.151
0.178
0.061
0.178
0.087
0.175
0.126
0.164
0.155
soil)
Cl
1
(day
0.007
0.009
0.007
0.007
0.009
0.015
0.016
0.016
0.009
0.009
0.011
0.009
0.007
0.006
0.007
0.006
0.007
0.015
0.015
0.014
0.007
0.008
0.008
0.009
kl
1
(g CO2C kg
0.002
0.003
0.001
0.002
0.002
0.001
0.001
0.001
0.002
0.002
0.003
0.002
0.001
0.002
0.002
0.002
0.003
0.002
0.003
0.001
0.003
0.002
0.003
0.003
0.212
0.181
0.197
0.242
0.148
0.386
0.561
0.780
0.163
0.366
0.601
0.852
0.188
0.207
0.209
0.238
0.214
0.391
0.577
0.788
0.189
0.406
0.603
0.821
0.070
0.058
0.025
0.044
0.060
0.036
0.047
0.103
0.069
0.056
0.087
0.059
0.032
0.049
0.048
0.031
0.089
0.065
0.174
0.076
0.089
0.061
0.077
0.084
soil)
RMSE
R2
0.035
0.052
0.025
0.035
0.044
0.039
0.058
0.114
0.045
0.048
0.064
0.044
0.018
0.039
0.040
0.025
0.049
0.068
0.203
0.091
0.052
0.044
0.059
0.066
0.994
0.983
0.996
0.988
0.990
0.998
0.998
0.996
0.989
0.992
0.989
0.996
0.998
0.990
0.988
0.995
0.984
0.995
0.976
0.997
0.982
0.992
0.989
0.990
10.0
8.2
8.4
7.5
8.8
16.3
22.4
26.1
8.5
11.1
11.7
13.4
6.0
6.2
5.9
6.1
6.1
11.4
15.5
20.0
5.8
7.4
8.2
9.6
(day
0.114
0.218
0.233
0.177
0.179
0.372
0.455
0.400
0.157
0.207
0.193
0.183
0.130
0.169
0.180
0.170
0.125
0.351
0.411
0.407
0.132
0.165
0.178
0.188
0.049
0.128
0.057
0.055
0.117
0.074
0.089
0.113
0.100
0.056
0.045
0.021
0.031
0.068
0.072
0.037
0.072
0.121
0.276
0.089
0.088
0.040
0.038
0.032
For the soils organically fertilized with these materials, cumulative CO2
emissions tend to increase with increasing the amendment rate, whereas the contrary is true for the soils treated with the mineral fertilizer.
These trends seem not to be affected by biochar addition.
Management practices that increase organic inputs, including
amendment with municipal solid waste compost and sewage sludge,
have been widely reported to increase soil microbial respiration and
CO2 emissions (Dick, 1992; Fernndez et al., 2007). The larger volume
of CO2 that evolved in the soils amended with municipal solid waste
compost compared to those treated with sewage sludge can be directly
attributed to higher amount of organic matter incorporated with
the former. In agreement with previous studies on similar systems
(Fernndez et al., 2007, 2012; Franco-Otero et al., 2012), the larger
CO2 emissions per unit of C added to the soils amended with sewage
sludge, however, suggest that the organic matter in the latter is less stable. Unlike other waste treatments such as heat drying, composting is
known to promote the biological degradation and stabilization of fresh
organic matter (Epstein, 1996; Plaza et al., 2005).
Table 2 shows the best-t parameters generated by nonlinear regression analysis of the experimental data of cumulative CO2 evolution
using the double exponential model. The small standard errors, small
root mean square errors (RMSE), and large coefcients of determination
(R2) indicate that the model ts very well with the observed data.
The analysis of variance for the double exponential model parameters (Table 3) indicates that the type of fertilizer affects signicantly
the size and decomposition rate of the stable and labile soil C compartments. In particular, the size and rate of the stable C pool (Cs and ks,
respectively) and the rate of the labile pool (kl) are larger for the
soils amended with municipal solid waste compost than for the soils
amended with sewage sludge, which in turn feature slightly larger
values than the soils treated with mineral fertilizer. In contrast, the
soils amended with sewage sludge, followed by the soils treated with
municipal solid waste compost, exhibit the largest sizes of labile pool
(Cl) (Table 2). The rate of fertilizer and the interactions between type
and rate of fertilizer are signicant for Cs and Cl, but not for ks and kl
(Table 3). In particular, Cs and Cl tend to increase with increasing the
amount of municipal solid waste compost and sewage sludge applied,
but not with increasing the rate of mineral fertilizer (Table 2).
Biochar has no signicant effects on the double exponential model
parameters and does not interact with the type and rate of fertilizer.
30
Without BC
28
With BC
Without BC
With BC
Without BC
With BC
Total C (g kg-1)
26
24
22
20
18
16
14
12
MF-0
MF-L
MF-M
MF-H
MC-0
MC-L
MC-M
MC-H
SS-0
SS-L
SS-M
SS-H
22
Without BC
With BC
Without BC
With BC
Without BC
With BC
20
18
16
14
12
10
8
MF-0
MF-L
MF-M
MF-H
MC-0
MC-L
MC-M
MC-H
SS-0
SS-L
SS-M
SS-H
8.0
Inorganic C (g kg-1)
Without BC
With BC
Without BC
With BC
Without BC
With BC
7.5
7.0
6.5
6.0
5.5
5.0
MF-0
MF-L
MF-M
MF-H
MC-0
MC-L
MC-M
MC-H
SS-0
SS-L
SS-M
SS-H
Fig. 2. Contents of total, organic, and inorganic C content in soils amended with mineral fertilizer (MF), municipal solid waste compost (MC), and sewage sludge (SS) at rates equivalent to
0, 75, 150, and 225 t potentially available N ha1 (0, L, M, and H, respectively), without or with biochar at 20 t ha1 (BC), after 182 days of incubation. Error bars represent pooled standard
error (n = 3).
These results are consistent with those reported by Liang et al. (2010) in
suggesting that biochar does not stimulate the mineralization of
added organic matter. On the contrary, these authors found that
the presence of black C enhances the incorporation and stabilization
of exogenous organic matter into aggregate and organo-mineral
fractions. Here the percentage of C that developed on the total C in
the various tests after 182 days is found to be lower for the treatments with biochar than for the corresponding treatments without
biochar.
3.3. Soil C fractions
The analysis of variance for the soil C fractions reveals that total and
organic C contents are signicantly affected (P b 0.05) by the biochar
application, the type and rate of fertilizer applied, and the interactions
between type and rate of fertilizer, whereas inorganic C content is
only affected by biochar. In particular, both total and organic C contents
in soil increase with increasing the rate of sewage sludge and especially
municipal solid waste compost, whereas increasing the rate of mineral
fertilizer appears not to have any effect (Fig. 2). These results may be
directly related to the amount and stability of the organic C applied
with the different fertilizers (Fernndez et al., 2007).
Biochar application increases signicantly both the organic and
inorganic C fractions (P b 0.05) without interacting with the other
amendments (Fig. 2). This result is consistent with the CO2 evolution
measurements reported here and agrees with other studies in
strongly suggesting that biochar is relatively inert in the time scale
of this incubation (Swift, 2001; Kuzyakov et al., 2009). It is especially
noteworthy that the average increase in inorganic C found in the
soils amended with biochar with respect to the unamended soils
(654 41 mg kg1) is markedly larger that the amount of inorganic
C added (170 19 g kg1). This enhanced inorganic C content, which
350
Without BC
With BC
Without BC
With BC
Without BC
With BC
300
250
200
150
100
50
0
MF-0
MF-L
MF-M
MF-H
MC-0
MC-L
MC-M
MC-H
SS-0
SS-L
SS-M
SS-H
3.0
Without BC
With BC
Without BC
With BC
Without BC
With BC
2.5
2.0
1.5
1.0
0.5
0.0
MF-0
MF-L
MF-M
MF-H
MC-0
MC-L
MC-M
MC-H
SS-0
SS-L
SS-M
SS-H
Fig. 3. Microbial biomass C content and microbial biomass C to total organic C ratio of soils amended with mineral fertilizer (MF), municipal solid waste compost (MC), and sewage sludge
(SS) at rates equivalent to 0, 75, 150, and 225 t potentially available N ha1 (0, L, M, and H, respectively), without or with biochar at 20 t ha1 (BC), after 182 days of incubation. Error bars
represent pooled standard error (n = 3).
Harris D, Horwath WR, van Kessel C. Acid fumigation of soils to remove carbonates prior
to total organic carbon or carbon-13 isotopic analysis. Soil Sci Soc Am J 2001;65:
18536.
Hilscher A, Heister K, Siewert C, Knicker H. Mineralisation and structural changes during
the initial phase of microbial degradation of pyrogenic plant residues in soil. Org
Geochem 2009;40:33242.
Horneck DA, Sullivan DM, Owen JS, Hart JM. Soil test interpretation guide. EC 1478.
Corvallis, OR: Oregon State University Extension Service; 2011.
Jeffery S, Verheijen FGA, van der Velde M, Bastos AC. A quantitative review of the effects
of biochar application to soils on crop productivity using meta-analysis. Agric Ecosyst
Environ 2011;144:17587.
Jenkinson DS. Studies on the decomposition of plant material in soil. V. The effects of plant
cover and soil type on the loss of carbon from 14C labelled ryegrass decomposing
under eld conditions. J Soil Sci 1977;28:42434.
Johnston AE, Poulton PR, Coleman K. Chapter 1. Soil organic matter: its importance in sustainable agriculture and carbon dioxide uxes. In: Sparks DS, editor. Advances in
agronomy. San Diego, CA: Elsevier Academic Press; 2009. p. 157.
Kallenbach C, Grandy AS. Controls over soil microbial biomass responses to carbon
amendments in agricultural systems: a meta-analysis. Agric Ecosyst Environ 2011;
144:24152.
Kirschbaum MUF. Will changes in soil carbon act as a positive or negative feedback on
global warming? Biogeochemistry 2000;48:2151.
Kuzyakov Y, Subbotina I, Chen H, Bogomolova I, Xu X. Black carbon decomposition and
incorporation into soil microbial biomass estimated by 14C labeling. Soil Biol Biochem
2009;41:2109.
Lal R. Carbon sequestration. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 2008;363:81530.
Lehmann J. A handful of carbon. Nature 2007;447:1434.
Lehmann J, Joseph S. Biochar for environmental management: science and technology.
London, UK: Earthscan; 2009.
Lehmann J, Rillig M, Thies J, Masiello CA, Hockaday WC, Crowley D. Biochar effects on soil
biota a review. Soil Biol Biochem 2011;43:181236.
Levi-Minzi R, Riffaldi R, Saviozzi A. Carbon mineralization in soil amended with different
organic materials. Agric Ecosyst Environ 1990;31:32535.
Liang BQ, Lehmann J, Sohi SP, Thies JE, O'Neill B, Trujillo L, et al. Black carbon affects the
cycling of non-black carbon in soil. Org Geochem 2010;41:20613.
Luo Y, Durenkamp M, De Nobili M, Lin Q, Brookes PC. Short term soil priming effects and
the mineralisation of biochar following its incorporation to soils of different pH. Soil
Biol Biochem 2011;43:230414.
Luo Y, Durenkamp M, De Nobili M, Lin Q, Devonshire BJ, Brookes PC. Microbial biomass
growth, following incorporation of biochars produced at 350 C or 700 C, in a
silty-clay loam soil of high and low pH. Soil Biol Biochem 2013;57:51323.
Major. Guidelines on practical aspects of biochar application to eld soil in various soil
management systems, Ver. 1.0, 9 November 2010. International Biochar Initiative;
2010.
Nguyen BT, Lehmann J. Black carbon decomposition under varying water regimes. Org
Geochem 2009;40:84653.
Plaza C, Senesi N, Brunetti G, Mondelli D. Cocomposting of sludge from olive oil mill
wastewater mixed with tree cuttings. Compost Sci Util 2005;13:217226.
Reynolds JF, Stafford Smith DM, Lambin EF, Turner II BL, Mortimore M, Batterbury SPJ,
et al. Global desertication: building a science for dryland development. Science
2007;316:84751.
Rousk J, Brookes PC, Bth E. Contrasting soil pH effects on fungal and bacterial growth
suggest functional redundancy in carbon mineralization. Appl Environ Microbiol
2009;75:158996.
Sanz-Cobena A, Misselbrook TH, Arce A, Mingot JI, Diez JA, Vallejo A. An inhibitor of
urease activity effectively reduces ammonia emissions from soil treated with urea
under Mediterranean conditions. Agric Ecosyst Environ 2008;126:2439.
Sigua GC, Novak JM, Watts DW, Cantrell KB, Shumaker PD, Szgi AA, et al. Carbon mineralization in two ultisols amended with different sources and particle sizes of pyrolyzed biochar. Chemosphere 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2013.12.024.
Sparks DL. Methods of soil analysis, part 3, chemical methods. SSSA Book Series, No. 5.
Madison, WI: Soil Science Society of America and American Society of Agronomy;
1996.
Swift RS. Sequestration of carbon by soil. Soil Sci 2001;166:85871.
Treseder KK. Nitrogen additions and microbial biomass: a meta-analysis of ecosystem
studies. Ecol Lett 2008;11:111120.
Vance ED, Brookes PC, Jenkinson DS. An extraction method for measuring soil microbial
biomass C. Soil Biol Biochem 1987;19:7037.
Wardle DA, Nilsson M-C, Zackrisson O. Fire-derived charcoal causes loss of forest humus.
Science 2008;321:1295.
Zimmermann M, Bird MI, Wurster C, Saiz G, Goodrick I, Barta J, et al. Rapid degradation of
pyrogenic carbon. Glob Chang Biol 2012;18:330616.