Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
130.47 (a)(b)
complete general requirements and demonstrate knowledge and skills specific to those
needed to enter a career in architecture and construction;
130.47 (c)
demonstrate knowledge and skills of advanced architectural design principles;
130.47 (2)(d)(e)
demonstrate knowledge of reading and interpreting architectural symbols, schematics,
blueprints, work drawings, manuals, bulletins and of descriptive geometry;
130.47 (4)(a)(c)
demonstrate knowledge of tool/material/equipment safety and of new/emerging
technologies;
Interdisciplinary Correlations:
This lesson, as published, correlates to the following TEKS. Any changes/alterations to the
activities may result in the elimination of any or all of the TEKS listed.
110.31 (b)(1)(a)(b)(c)(d)(e)
demonstrate knowledge of vocabulary, technical academic English derived from Latin/Greek
roots, determining denotative/connotative meanings of words, analogies, understanding of
frequently used foreign words and use of an electronic or printed dictionary, glossary or
thesaurus.
Instructor/Trainer
References:
1. Curriculum developer knowledge
2. Curriculum developer-made handouts
Instructional Aids:
1. Architectural Lettering PowerPoint Presentation
Architectural Drafting I: Architectural Communications: Architectural Lettering Plan
UNT in Partnership with TEA. Copyright . All Rights Reserved.
1
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
Materials Needed:
For Teacher:
1. Large drafting triangle for teacher
2. Expo/whiteboard markers for teacher
3. White copy paper 1 sheet
4. Drafting tape 4 small pieces for corners of paper
5. Architects scale or ruler
6. Examples of architectural drawings without lettering
7. Examples of architectural drawings with poor lettering
8. Examples of architectural drawings with good lettering
9. Examples of architectural drawings with exceptional lettering
For Students (each item per each student)
10. HB pencil
11. Pencil sharpeners
12. White vinyl erasers
13. White copy paper
14. Drafting tape 4 small pieces for corners of paper
15. Parallel bar or T-square
16. Drafting triangle
17. Architects scale or ruler
Equipment Needed:
1. Projector for PPT
2. Whiteboard for demonstration
Learner
Reading units of measure.
Introduction
Introduction (LSI Quadrant I):
SHOW: Examples of drawings without lettering and drawings with exceptional lettering.
ASK: What are the differences between these two drawing sets?
[Guide students in comparing/contrasting the two sets. Guide them to the logical conclusion
that lettering is important for communication.]
SAY: However, it is not enough to simply have a lettered drawing.
SHOW: Examples of drawings with poor, good, and exceptional lettering.
Architectural Drafting I: Architectural Communications: Architectural Lettering Plan
UNT in Partnership with TEA. Copyright . All Rights Reserved.
2
SAY: It is critical that architectural lettering be readable. The better the quality of the lettering,
the more readable the drawing becomes.
ASK: What might be the consequences of an unreadable drawing set?
[You may get various responsestry to guide students to the realization that if dimensions,
symbols, and specifications are unreadable, mistakes could be made by contractors that could
be very costly in terms of money, materials, equipment, and/or structural integrity.]
ASK: Who do you think decides what readable lettering is? [Wait for responses most will
not have a clueif you get something close to the architect, then use that response to segue
into the next statement.]
SAY: Actually, there are office standards. For example, suppose in an office that more than
one person works on a set of drawings, we wouldnt want there to be a major difference in the
quality of the lettering. Therefore, office standards are established for lettering. In many cases
today, offices use AutoCAD and the text tool within the software, so hand lettering may not be a
required skill. However, there are still some offices in which lettering is a desirable or required
skill.
SAY: For the purpose of this class, we will have a classroom standard for architectural lettering.
Today you are going to learn that standard, and from this point forward, you will be expected to
apply that standard to every assignment and project you work on in this class.
Outline
Outline (LSI Quadrant II):
I.
Define terms associated with the lesson (refer to Lettering Handout for lettering-specific
terms)
A. Architectural lettering
B. Vinyl eraser
C. HB pencil
D. Drafting triangle
E. Parallel bar or T-square (or both)
F. Serif
G. Sans Serif
H. Guidelines
I. Vertical Strokes
J. Freehand Strokes
II.
Identify and explain architectural lettering concepts
A. All letters capitalized
B. All letters the same height
C. All letters with a uniform width (except the letter I)
D. Sans serif
E. All vertical strokes are drafted
F. All horizontal strokes are freehand
III.
Demonstrate architectural lettering concepts
A. Taping a drawing
B. Measuring guidelines/spaces in between
C. Using the parallel bar/t-square to draft horizontal guidelines
D. Using the parallel bar/t-square and triangle to draft vertical guidelines
E. Creating a chisel point
Architectural Drafting I: Architectural Communications: Architectural Lettering Plan
UNT in Partnership with TEA. Copyright . All Rights Reserved.
3
F.
G.
H.
I.
J.
the concepts.
Extension/Enrichment (LSI Quadrant IV):
Apply architectural lettering to future assignments/projects.
6. Arial
7. Bell MT
8. Garamond
9. Broadway
10. Antique Olive
11. Elephant
12. Footlight MT Light
13. Impact
14. Times New Roman
15. Century Gothic
A. Serif
B. Sans serif
6. Arial
7. Bell MT
8. Garamond
9. Broadway
10. Antique Olive
11. Elephant
12. Footlight MT Light
13. Impact
14. Times New Roman
15. Century Gothic
A. Serif
B. Sans serif
Average
10-6
Below
Average
5-1
Unacceptable
0
1/4" guidelines
with 1/8 spaces
1-2
measurement
errors
3-4
measurement
errors
5-6
measurement
errors
More than 6
measurement
errors
Spelling
Accuracy
1-2 spelling
errors
3-4 spelling
errors
5-6 spelling
errors
More than 6
spelling errors
Lettering
Quality
Lettering missing
1 element
Average
missing 2
elements
Below average
only 1 element
present
Letter Width
and Spacing
Quality
Guideline
Quality
Criteria
Scale
Exceptional
20-16
Comments
Unacceptable
guidelines