Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
The attached
copy is furnished to the author for internal non-commercial research
and education use, including for instruction at the authors institution
and sharing with colleagues.
Other uses, including reproduction and distribution, or selling or
licensing copies, or posting to personal, institutional or third party
websites are prohibited.
In most cases authors are permitted to post their version of the
article (e.g. in Word or Tex form) to their personal website or
institutional repository. Authors requiring further information
regarding Elseviers archiving and manuscript policies are
encouraged to visit:
http://www.elsevier.com/copyright
Review
a r t i c l e i n f o
a b s t r a c t
Article history:
Received 8 February 2011
Received in revised form
1 April 2011
Accepted 16 April 2011
Available online 22 April 2011
This paper reviews past studies on the measurement of rheological properties of pulp bre suspensions.
Such suspensions are complex uids important in the manufacture of many pulp-bre based products,
such as communication papers, hygiene products, packaging, as well as other bre-based materials.
Pulp suspensions play a role in other biomass conversion processes as well. This review focuses on key
properties of bre suspensions, such as regimes of behaviour based on inter-bre contact, apparent
yield stress, apparent viscosity, and viscoelasticity. Difculties encountered in measurement of these
properties due to ow regime changes, heterogeneous mass distribution, and formation of depletion
layers at solid boundaries is discussed and methods to overcome them are reviewed.
& 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Keywords:
Pulp bre suspension
Biomass
Rheology
Complex uids
Viscoelasticity
Multiphase ow
Contents
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3461
Background . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3461
2.1.
Fibre properties and consistency ranges . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3461
2.2.
Fibre contacts and forces . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3461
2.3.
Forces on bres and occulation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3461
2.4.
Rheology of bre suspensions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3462
Apparent yield stress . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3462
3.1.
General . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3462
3.2.
Apparent yield stress of bre suspensions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3462
3.3.
Modied rheometers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3463
3.4.
Vaned-geometry devices . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3463
3.5.
Findings of various approaches to measure apparent yield stress . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3464
3.6.
Modelling apparent yield stress . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3465
Shear viscosity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3465
4.1.
Suspensions of synthetic bres . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3465
4.2.
Shear viscosity of pulp suspensions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3465
4.3.
Extensional viscosity of bre suspensions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3466
Viscoelasticity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3466
Fluidisation of pulp suspensions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3467
Applications in pipe ow. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3467
Summary and conclusions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3468
Nomenclature. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3468
Acknowledgements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3468
References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3469
Corresponding author.
E-mail address: hatzikir@interchange.ubc.ca (S.G. Hatzikiriakos).
1
Posthumous
0009-2509/$ - see front matter & 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
doi:10.1016/j.ces.2011.04.017
1. Introduction
Flow of bre suspensions is a key factor in manufacturing a
diverse range of products, for example, bre-reinforced composites, food stuffs, carpeting, and textiles (Tucker and Advani,
1994; Papathanasiou and Guell, 1997; Piteira et al., 2006; Umer
et al., 2007). Of these industries, none is larger than pulp
and paper manufacture. This is a major industry in almost all
countries, producing communication papers, packaging, boxes,
tissue, hygiene products, and an assortment of disposable products. Fibre for this industry comes from pulping biomass, mostly
trees in modern times. As such, the industry is based on a
sustainable, renewable, carbon-neutral resource.
There is growing interest in new uses of biomass. The worlds
increasing population requires that more energy and products
come from renewable resources and moreover ones that do not
impinge upon the food supply. The forest biomass is a logical
source. As in the case of pulp and paper, processing biomass for
these new applications will require handling of bres in suspension in various stages of processing.
Extensive studies of bre suspensions have been reported in
the pulp and paper scientic literature. However, many of these
journals are not readily accessible to the wider scientic community. Among the publications are some noteworthy reviews of the
eld, namely Norman et al. (1978), Kerekes et al. (1985), Norman
2. Background
2.1. Fibre properties and consistency ranges
Wood pulp bres are hollow tubes having typical average
length 13 mm and diameter 1530 mm. There is a wide variability around these averages, even within one species. Accordingly, bre length is specied by various weighted averages,
a typical one being length-weighted average for bre length to
give weight to the longer bres in the distribution.
Wood bres are composites made up of spirally wound brils
of cellulose. Some newer applications of wood pulp are being
developed to exploit the unique properties of these brils.
Examples are micro-brillated cellulose (MFC) and nano-crystalline cellulose (NCC). MFC are small brous particles of length
3461
VL rb
1
Cv Cm
rf
rw
L2
Fig. 1. Instantaneous viscosity versus shear stress by applying a linear shear stress
ramp. Apparent yield stress is dened as the shear stress at which, the instantaneous viscosity is at its maximum (Derakhshandeh et al., 2010a).
3463
Fig. 4. Storage modulus (J) and loss modulus (K) as a function of strain. Critical
shear strain (gc) denes the limit of the linear viscoelasticity region and is used to
obtain the apparent yield stress of pulp suspensions (Swerin et al., 1992).
Fig. 5. Vane in bafed housing device used to study pulp bre suspensions
(Head, 1952).
sy sT
2
R1
Ry
tip. Local velocities were measured in the gap between R1 and Ry.
The results showed good agreement with apparent yield stress
values obtained using the linear shear stress ramp method, i.e. the
shear stress at which the instantaneous viscosity was a maximum, thereby verifying this simpler technique as a reliable
measurement of apparent yield stress (Derakhshandeh et al.,
2010a).
3.5. Findings of various approaches to measure apparent yield stress
All workers found the apparent yield stress to depend on a
power of the consistency. At low consistency, the power dependence is for the difference between the consistency being tested
and a threshold consistency at which networks form. The premise
here is that consistencies below the threshold do not contribute
to mechanical strength. Thalen and Wahren (1964a) dened the
threshold by a sediment concentration, Cs, as shown in Eq. (4)
below. Later, Martinez et al. (2001) dened it by the gel crowding
number NG as shown in Eq. (5).
sy aCm Cs b
sy aCmb
or
sy aNNG b where NG 16
sy aCvb
Fig. 6. Velocity proles across the gap for SBK pulp suspensions at several mass
concentrations. Solid lines are the best ts to the data by the HerschelBulkley
model with constants listed in the insert (Derakhshandeh et al., 2010a).
All the measurements of apparent yield stress have considerable scatter, often as much as 100%. To determine an average
value, Bennington et al. (1990) dened a relative apparent yield
stress to be that measured in a single test divided by the average
apparent yield stress for all tests performed under the same
experimental conditions. Using the relative apparent yield stress,
experimental data were compared on a normalised basis and
approximated by a Gaussian distribution. The coefcient of
variation for the apparent yield stress of pulp suspensions found
to be 20% and for synthetic bres to be 45%.
Scatter in the data is due to many factors, including how
apparent yield stress is dened and the method of measurement.
For example, apparent yield stresses obtained by quasi-static
methods were all larger than those measured using dynamic
methods. Other difference are illustrated in the methods and
denitions employed in studies of Gullichsen and Harkonen
Table 1
Apparent yield stress of SBK suspension obtained using different methods.
Reference
Measurement method
sy (Pa)
Cm 3%
sy (Pa)
Cm 6%
176
19.3
131
350
130
248
154
137
1220
117
60
1100
The values range from 19.3 to 350 Pa for a consistency of 3%, and
from 60 to 1220 Pa for a consistency of 6%.
3.6. Modelling apparent yield stress
Several workers developed mathematical models of bre networks to predict apparent yield stress. Bennington et al. (1990)
derived an equation based on network theory that included bre
aspect ratio and Youngs modulus as follows:
sy cEA2 Cv 3
4. Shear viscosity
4.1. Suspensions of synthetic bres
Relatively few studies have been devoted to measuring the
viscosity of pulp suspensions, although there have been a substantial number for the simpler case of synthetic (plastic, glass)
bres of uniform size and shape. Although this review is focused
on pulp bres, there are sufcient similarities to synthetic bres
to warrant a brief discussion here.
References to many of the major studies of synthetic bres can
be found in review papers and literature surveys in papers on the
subject, for example Ganani and Powell (1985), Bennington and
Kerekes (1996), Petrie (1999), Kerekes (2006), and Eberle et al.
(2008). Some studies are particularly relevant to pulp bre
suspensions. Nawab and Mason (1958) measured the viscosity
of dilute suspensions of thread-like rayon bres in castor oil. They
employed a bob and cup viscometer equipped with a microscope
to check for wall slippage. Fibre aspect ratio had a strong effect on
suspension viscosity and its shear dependence. In other work,
Blakeney (1966) examined the effect of bre concentration on the
relative viscosity of suspensions of straight, rigid nylon bres
with aspect ratio of about 20. He found that at Cv 40.0042,
viscosity increased dramatically with concentration. Interestingly,
this condition is N E1.
Ziegel (1970) measured the viscosity of suspensions of glass
rods, glass plates and asbestos bres in high viscosity polymer
uids and compared them with those of spherical particles. Horie
and Pinder (1979) measured the viscosity of suspension of nylon
bres over a wide range of consistency and shear rates; they
found thixotropy and that thickness of the shearing layer in the
viscometer to depend on time of shearing.
Kitano and Kataoka (1981) employed a cone-plate rheometer
to study the steady shear ow properties of suspensions of
vinylon bres in silicone oil up to Cm 7%. Ganani and Powell
(1986) studied the rheological behaviour of monodisperse glass
bres both in Newtonian and non-Newtonian suspending media
at bre volume fractions of 0.02, 0.05, and 0.08. Milliken et al.
(1989) employed falling-ball rheometry to measure viscosity of
monodisperse randomly oriented rods in a Newtonian uid.
3465
Fig. 7. Shear stress versus shear rate for 0.05% mixed pulp bre suspensions.
Three different regimes were observed for pulp suspensions (Chen et al., 2003).
11
5. Viscoelasticity
Pulp bre suspensions exhibit elastic as well as viscous
behaviour and therefore are considered viscoelastic. As in the
case of measuring viscosity, measuring viscoelasticity in bre
suspensions is not simple. Here too some relevant work was
carried out on suspensions of synthetic bres.
One approach to measurement has been by normal stress
differences. Nawab and Mason (1958) were the rst to observe
viscoelasticity in concentrated bre suspensions at N 456 in the
form of the Weissenberg or rod-climbing effect. Kitano and
Kataoka (1981) employed a cone-plate rheometer to study the
steady shear ow properties of suspensions composed of vinylon
in silicone oil up to Cm 7%. First normal-stress differences
increased with bre concentration, aspect ratio, and shear rate.
Petrich et al. (2000) measured the rst normal stress difference
of a glass bre suspension using a parallel-plate rheometer. They
found that, for bre suspensions, the rst normal stress difference
is directly proportional to the shear rate. It is of interest to note
that a similar dependence was found between rst normal stress
difference and shear rate in dilute suspensions of rigid, axisymmetric Brownian particles in a Newtonian uid (Brenner, 1974).
3467
7. Applications in pipe ow
In concluding this review, it is useful to illustrate how the
rheology described above affects one of the most important
owspipe ow. A key early study by Robertson and Mason
(1957), followed by numerous other studies cited in the review
papers in the Introduction, identied three regimes of ow
behaviour, which take place with increasing velocity. These
regimes give an S shaped friction loss curve as shown in Fig. 8
where pipe friction loss, DH (Pa), has been plotted against pipe
ow velocity, V (m/s).
At low velocity, a plug ow exists in which the suspension
scrapes along the wall, with some rolling of bres at the
wall (Region 1). As velocity increases, a clear water annulus
Nomenclature
develops between the pulp plug and pipe wall (starting at peak of
Region 1). Shear is concentrated in this annulus. With increasing
velocity, the size of this annulus increases in greater proportion
than the velocity increase, thereby causing a decrease in wall
shear and consequently a decrease in friction loss with increasing
velocity (Region 2 between peak and minimum). As velocity
increases further, the annulus turns turbulent, pulling and mixing
bres in the annulus (Region 2, minimum). This starts the mixed
ow regime. As velocity increases, the size of the turbulent
annulus increases and the plug core decreases. At a point in this
mixed regime, the friction loss of the suspension becomes less
than that of the water owing alone at the same rate, i.e., the ow
exhibits drag reduction. As velocity increases further, in Region
3 eventually a fully turbulent regime is attained over the whole
diameter.
The above regimes occur in the low consistency range. Clearly,
the range of ow behaviour is very broad, extending from mechanical friction at the wall to turbulent drag reduction. In the case of
drag reduction, pulp bre suspensions are one of the earliest and
most consistent solidliquid suspensions in which this phenomenon
has been observed. The phenomenon is also found in suspensions of
synthetic bres (Kerekes and Douglas, 1972).
At medium consistency, suspensions are virtually always in
plug ow. Furthermore, in this range, the suspension is compressible because of its high air content, and therefore pressure, as
well as pressure difference, is important for ow. A larger
pressure causes the suspension to compress and thereby exert
greater mechanical force on the wall, which leads to greater
friction loss (Longdill and Duffy, 1988).
Attempts have been made over the years to model friction loss of
pulp suspensions in pipe ow, for example Daily and Bugliarello
(1961), Luthi (1987), and Pettersson (2004), but these have found
limited use. Reasons for this are many, as discussed in this paper and
by Duffy (2003, 2006). Accordingly, predictions of friction loss in
pipe ow in the pulp and paper industry are commonly made by
empirical procedures (Duffy, 1978) that have been adopted as
industry standard methods (Tappi Press TIS 0410-12).
a
b
L
D
d
A
E
Cm
Cv
Cs
VL
Xw
N
NG
DT
DR
t
R1
Ry
r
u(r)
G0
G00
DH
V
constant (Pa)
constant ()
bre length (mm)
outer diameter of bre (mm)
inner diameter of bre (mm)
bre aspect ratio ()
bres modulus of elasticity (Pa)
bre mass concentration (%)
bre volume concentration (%)
sediment concentration (%)
lumen volume per unit mass of bre (m3/kg bre)
water mass located in the bre wall (kg water/kg bre)
crowding number ()
gel crowding number ()
outer housing diameter (m)
rotor diameter (m)
time (s)
vane radius (mm)
yielding radius (mm)
local radius within the gap of the rheometer (mm)
local velocity across the gap of the rheometer (mm/s)
storage modulus (Pa)
loss modulus (Pa)
pipe friction loss (Pa)
pipe ow velocity (m/s)
Greek letters
g
g_
jg
Z
ma
rb
rf
rw
s
sT
sy
ef
o
strain (%)
shear rate (s 1)
volume fraction of gas phase in suspension ()
instantaneous viscosity (Pa s)
apparent viscosity (Pa s)
bulk density (kg/m3)
bre density (kg/m3)
water density (kg/m3)
shear stress (Pa)
steady-state shear stress at the vane (Pa)
apparent yield stress (Pa)
power dissipation/unit volume (w/m3)
bre coarseness (g/m)
Abbreviations
SBK
HW
UDV
Acknowledgements
References
3469
Swerin, A., Powell, R.L., Odberg, L., 1992. Linear and nonlinear dynamic viscoelasticity of pulp bre suspensions. Nordic Pulp Paper Research Journal 7 (3),
126143.
Swerin, A., 1998. Rheological properties of cellulosic bre suspensions occulated
by cationic polyacrylamides. Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and
Engineering Aspects 133 (3), 279294.
Switzer, L.H., Klingenberg, D.J., 2003. Simulations of bre oc dispersion in linear
ow elds. Nordic Pulp Paper Research Journal 18, 141144.
Stickel, J.J., Knutsen, J.S., Liberatore, M.W., Luu, W., Bouseld, D.W., Klingenberg,
D.J., Scott, C.T., Root, T.W., Ehrhardt, M.R., Monz, T.O., 2009. Rheology
measurements of a biomass slurry: an inter-laboratory study. Rheologica Acta
48 (9), 10051015.
Steenberg, B., Johansson, B., 1958. Viscous properties of pulp suspension at high
shear-rates. Svensk Papperstidning 61 (18), 696700.
Thalen, N., Wahren, D., 1964. A New Elastoviscometer. Svensk Papperstidn 67 (6),
226231.
Thalen, N., Wahren, D., 1964a. Shear modulus and ultimate shear strength of some
paper pulp bre networks. Svensk Papperstidning 67 (7), 259264.
Thalen, N., Wahren, D., 1964b. An experimental investigation of the shear modulus
of model bre networks. Svensk Papperstidning 67 (11), 474480.
Tucker III, C.L., Advani, S.G., 1994. Flow and Rheology in Polymeric Composites
Manufacturing. Elsevier Publishers, Amsterdam, pp. 147202.
Umer, R., Bickerton, S., Fernyhough, A., 2007. Modelling liquid composite moulding processes employing wood bre mat reinforcements. Key Engineering
Materials 334, 113116.
Van de ven, T.G.M., 2006. Interactions between bres and colloidal particles
subjected to ow. Annual Transactions of the Nordic Rheology Society 14,
917.
Wahren, D., 1980. Fibre network structures in papermaking operations. In:
Proceedings of the Conference on Paper Science and Technology, The Cutting
Edge, Institute of Paper Science and Technology, Atlanta, 112pp.
Wikstrom,
T., Rasmuson, A., 1998. Yield stress of pulp suspensions: the inuence
of bre properties and processing conditions. Nordic Pulp Paper Resource
Journal 13 (3), 243250.
Wikstrom, T., Rasmuson, A., 2002. Transition modelling of pulp suspensions
applied to a pressure screen. Journal of Pulp and Paper Science 28 (11),
374378.