Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Brandwitz 2015
Sep 18, 2015
INTRODUCTIONi
Mr. Kabir Bin Anwar, Program Director of the Access to Information (A2I) project pondered
about the future of the Service Innovation Fund (SIF) initiative as he waited for his team to
deliver the progress report on the project that they had worked on tirelessly for the past few
weeks.
Mr. Mustafizur Rahman, Director (Innovation) stood up and said, So far we have funded 62
initiatives, which fit the criteria for the SIF. I am happy to report that among these, 10 of the
projects have successfully completed the 12-month pilot implementation phase and have
developed into sustainable ideas that can continue into the foreseeable future. The rest are
still in the pipeline. I am optimistic about their progress.
The room broke out into applause. Anir Chowdhury, Policy Advisor slowly clapped along with
the rest of the team. His concerns, however, were far from over.
Ghazi Kamrul Abedin, a student of the Institute of Business Administration (IBA), University of Dhaka developed this case in
collaboration with Md. Shakhawatul Islam, Innovation Associate, Access to Information (A2I) Program, solely for Brandwitz
2015, organized by IBA Communication Club, IBA, University of Dhaka. This case is not intended to serve as an endorsement,
a source of primary data, or an illustration of effective or ineffective management. The case was prepared under the aegis of
Access to Information (A2I) Program, Prime Ministers Office, Government of the Peoples Republic of Bangladesh.
Copyright @2015 IBA Communication Club (IBACC). The publication may not be digitized, photocopied, or otherwise
reproduced, posted or transmitted, without the permission of IBA Communications Club.
1
Adapted with permission from Access to Information (a2i) program web page. See
http://www.a2i.pmo.gov.bd/sites/default/files/Service%20Innovation%20Fund_09_Janu_14.pdf
Anything else we should know? he asked his team. The atmosphere in the room had
turned uneasy. The question was unexpected.
Out of the sixty two projects that we have funded using SIF so far, forty of the proposals
came from public offices. The remaining came from private sector individuals and firms. one
of the associates answered as he pointed to the information presented in the slide.
So, let me get this straight. said Mr. Chowdhury. Essentially, private sector participation is
fairly low compared to public sector participation. Also, there is always a risk of adverse
selection, whether the funded projects can be sustainable in the long run at all. Even if they
are sustainable, how do we ensure effective scale up and commercialization in the future?
Mr. Anwar always knew in his mind that private sector participation was significantly lower
than it should be and something had to be done. The numbers only reaffirmed his point.
So? What do you guys think? asked Mr. Anwar. We planned on disbursing around eighty
crores in seed funds for any idea that used technology to improve the provision of public
services, regardless of whom it came from. Proposals from within the government are to be
expected with any government initiative. What about the rest of the country? he added.
The conference room fell silent.
Only yesterday, I just happened to see three proposals. The first one was from a public
office, which proposed an innovative way for processing traffic tickets and fines online. The
second one was from a software service provider with a request for developing an SMSbased query system for livestock services. The third one was from an NGO requesting to
finance a dairy firm initiative to provide access to milk and dairy products for the local
community. Clearly, people have differing opinions than that of our own regarding what
innovation in delivering public services mean. he remarked.
I refuse to believe that there are only 62 ideas worth funding in this nation of 160 million
people. We need to be in talks with the right people who can pitch more innovative
proposals. Either find them or help them find us. he concluded as he stood up to leave the
meeting.
On his way back to his office, Mr. Anwar reflected on the humble beginnings of the Access to
Information (a2i) Program, how it had transformed from a simple idea into an ambassador
for the Digital Bangladesh revolution.2
The excerpt provided is a simulation of a meeting between the Project Director of the Access to Information (a2i) program and
the team working on the Service Innovation Fund (SIF) project. All dialogues used in the excerpt are fictitious and have been
designed to provide a realistic setting for academic discussion.
The objective of the project is to increase transparency, improve governance, and reduce
the time, difficulty and costs of obtaining government services for under-served communities
of Bangladesh. This is to be achieved by:
3
4
Reducing time to receive a service (including travel time, waiting time etc.)
Reducing the cost of availing such services (fees, travel expenses, lost wages,
opportunity costs, overnight accommodation expenses etc.)
Reducing the number of visits to government offices to complete relevant formalities,
transaction and then receive the service
Improving the quality of service
5
6
7
Ibid.
Ibid
For a complete list of SIF awardees, see http://www.a2i.pmo.gov.bd/innovation-fund-awardees
MECHANISM OF FUNDING
The amount awarded depends on the scope of the project and a maximum of twenty-five
lacs in Taka can be allotted for a single proposal. The proposals for the Service Innovation
Fund are collected online only through a web-based portal available in the a2i website.
Interested applicants have to register with the system (See Exhibit 3) and fill up a form that
looks for seven basic criteria: the name of the initiative (in 20 words or less), the category of
the proposed project, the problem that the initiative looks to address, the proposed solution,
the dependents (the relevant ministries, departments, individuals or institutions whose help
is needed), the beneficiaries and the duration of the project9. In the absence of access to a
personal computer or device to submit the proposal, applicants can register through the help
of their respective Union/Pouro/City Digital Centers (UDC/PDC/CDC). A common problem
faced by a2i is that many non-government organizations (NGOs) often submit proposals
that have been prepared in a different format. The seven-point format required by a2i is
purely to facilitate ease of submission, thus bypassing the need for detailed and meticulous
business plans. Once proposals have been submitted, they are handed over to the TEP,
which then shortlists the proposals based on how well they have covered the scope of the
SIF. The shortlisted applicants are then provided with a comprehensive proposal format to
prepare for a proposal-designing workshop. The workshop guides the applicants in
preparing presentations, project design, work plan, time plan and budget (See Exhibit 4).
The applicants then officially present their proposals using the documents fine-tuned in the
workshop (See Exhibit 5). The proposals are then scored on the basis of the scope of the
problem identified, the quality of the solution, the feasibility of implementation and the longterm sustainability of the venture.10 (See Exhibit 6)
Technical Experts Panel (TEP) evaluates every proposal for its potential and long-term sustainability. They are the evaluators
of the fund. The panel mostly includes personnel with domain expertise along with a thorough understanding of public service
delivery development
9
Source: http://www.a2i.pmo.gov.bd/content/frequently-asked-question-faq-innovation-fund
10
Ibid.
Proposals are evaluated in rounds and there are no limits to the number of proposals that
can get awarded in each round. Approved projects are usually allowed a maximum time
frame of 12 months to successfully launch and implement the pilot project. The project is
continuously monitored throughout the tenure and after 12 months, the success is measured
using a thorough analysis of time, cost and value (TCV). The objective is not to create a
stand-alone project but rather a platform that can be integrated into the government system
and scaled up accordingly if the venture significantly improves the relevant public service
delivery. (See Exhibit 7)
CAMPAIGNS
The Innovation Circle is a public service innovation demonstration and review event
arranged by Divisional Commissioners Office, supported by Cabinet division and
coordinated by a2i program for all divisional, district and Upazila level Innovation Teams for
creating an innovation culture within civil service. Culture, in this context, means creating
enthusiasm in generating service innovation ideas, learning to experiment even with failure,
working in teams, implementing ideas with local fund, creating local project review
mechanisms, recognizing excellence in delivering innovation etc. The Divisional
Commissioners Office arranges the meeting. It involves cross-departmental synergy as the
relevant ministries, departments and offices pool their resources to provide mentors and
expert advice for the innovators.11
The Students Innovation Camp is an attempt to engage young, creative minds from all over
the country to put forward innovative ideas and to develop the culture of pursuit of
innovation at every level within the education system. Students are encouraged to
participate in these programs, where opportunities exist for their ideas to be transformed into
tangible projects under the patronage of the SIF initiative.12
Access to Information (a2i) maintains an active Facebook page where it regularly posts
interesting content relevant to innovation, answers follower queries. It provides a platform to
engage with target audiences through the power of the Internet and social media.13
11
CONCLUSION
Back in his office, Mr. Kabir Bin Anwar wondered about the future of the SIF program and
whether it showed enough promise to warrant an expansion from a USD 10 million fund to a
USD 50 million behemoth. He had hoped that by this time, the project would have seen more
success. A flurry of questions flooded his mind. Were there any strategic shortcomings?
Which problems needed immediate attention? Should they do something to resolve the
issues or was it too early to take action? If so, how would they go about doing it? Were these
the right questions at all? These were questions that needed real answers.
EXHIBIT 1
Infograph highlighting the various successful public service improvement initiatives taken
under the Access to Information (a2i) Program, Prime Ministers Office.
EXHIBIT 2
An example of an innovation public service; e-Purjee: A Quick Win Initiative
EXHIBIT 3
Registration and login interface for the SIF online application portal
EXHIBIT 4
Applicant for SIF being mentored in a presentation design workshop before facing TEP
selection
EXHIBIT 5
SIF Applicant presenting project proposal to Technical Expert Panel (TEP)
EXHIBIT 6
SIF Awardees meet the CIOs/IOs of public offices relevant to their projects and receive
training on project management in an orientation workshop
10
EXHIBIT 7
Honorable Prime Minister handing over multimedia talking books (developed using SIF by
YPSA) to visually impaired students at a book handover ceremony on January 1, 2015
EXHIBIT 8
Upazilla Agricultural Extension Officer, Belkuchi, Sirajganj, getting awarded the Service
Innovation Fund (SIF) at an award ceremony on February 12, 2015
11
EXHIBIT 9
The Access to Information (a2i) Innovation Cycle
The Institute of Business Administration (IBA), University of Dhaka and IBA Communication Club (IBACC) would
like to put in a special mention for Mr. Kabir Bin Anwar, Mr. Mustafizur Rahman and Mr. Anir Chowdhury for
kindly allowing the use of their names and designations in the preparation of this case.
12